arxiv: 2605.13903 · v1 · pith:JUV6GX3Bnew · submitted 2026-05-12 · ✦ hep-ph · nucl-th

Radiative decays of the 1P, 1D, 2S, and 2P Λ_c and 1D, 2S, and 2P Xi_c charmed baryons

R. Gamboa-Goni , Ailier Rivero-Acosta , H. Garc\'ia-Tecocoatzi , A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez , A. Ramirez-Morales , E. Santopinto , Carlos Alberto Vaquera-Araujo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 04:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph nucl-th

keywords radiative decayscharmed baryonsconstituent quark modelbranching ratiosXi_c resonancesLambda_celectromagnetic transitionsflavor anti-triplet

0 comments

The pith

Calculations of radiative decays provide branching ratios that confirm the quantum numbers of the Ξc(3055) charmed baryon.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes electromagnetic transition rates for excited states of Lambda_c and Xi_c baryons within the constituent quark model. It focuses on decays from P-, D-, and S-wave excitations to ground and P-wave states. These rates are used to generate branching ratios that can identify which excited state corresponds to the observed Ξc(3055) resonance reported by LHCb. The work also explores two possible assignments for the Ξc(3080) and supplies the ratios needed to distinguish them. Such radiative data are valuable because they remain diagnostic even when mass and total width alone leave multiple candidates viable.

Core claim

Using the constituent quark model, the authors calculate the radiative decay widths and branching ratios for transitions involving the 1P, 1D, 2S, and 2P states of the Lambda_c and Xi_c baryons in the flavor anti-triplet. The results indicate that the observed Ξc(3055) matches the expected ratios for a specific assignment, while the Ξc(3080) could be either the 1D state with J^P = 5/2+ or the 2S with J^P = 1/2+, and the branching ratios are provided to test these possibilities.

What carries the argument

Constituent quark model wave functions combined with electromagnetic transition operators applied to mixed rho-lambda configurations in singly charmed baryons.

If this is right

Branching ratios confirm the assignment of Ξc(3055) as reported by LHCb.
Branching ratios support one of two possible assignments for Ξc(3080): 1D with J^P=5/2+ or 2S with J^P=1/2+.
New calculations cover D_rho-wave states, rho-lambda mixed configurations, and rho-mode radially excited states for the first time.
Radiative decays serve as a tool to resolve ambiguities when multiple states have similar masses and widths.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar radiative calculations could be extended to other heavy baryon families to aid resonance identification.
Experimental measurement of these branching ratios would provide a direct test independent of hadronic decay models.
Discrepancies between predicted and measured ratios could signal the need for refinements in the quark model wave functions.

Load-bearing premise

The constituent quark model wave functions and electromagnetic operators accurately capture the radiative transitions for these P-, D-, and S-wave states including mixed configurations.

What would settle it

A measurement of the branching ratios for the decays of Ξc(3055) or Ξc(3080) that deviates significantly from the predicted values for the assigned states would falsify the assignments or the model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13903 by A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez, Ailier Rivero-Acosta, A. Ramirez-Morales, Carlos Alberto Vaquera-Araujo, E. Santopinto, H. Garc\'ia-Tecocoatzi, R. Gamboa-Goni.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2: Comparison between the predicted masses of singly charmed baryon belonging to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We analyze the radiative decays of the the 1$P$, 1$D$, 2$S$, and 2$P$ $\Lambda_c$ and 1$D$, 2$S$, and 2$P$ $\Xi_c$ charmed baryons, which belong to the flavor anti-triplet ($\bf {\bar 3}_{\rm F}$), using the constituent quark model. We compute electromagnetic transitions from ground and $P$-wave states to ground states, as well as from second-shell states to both ground and $P$-wave final states. Electromagnetic decay widths are especially valuable for identifying resonances when multiple states share the same mass and total decay width. We give branching ratios which can confirm the assignment of the $\Xi_c(3055)$ reported by LHCb. We also give branching ratios that can support the assignment of the $\Xi_c(3080)$, and discuss the possibilities for the $\Xi_c(3080)$ to be the 1$D$ state with $J^P=5/2^{+}$ or the 2$S$ with $J^P=1/2^{+}$. For the first time, this work provides calculations of electromagnetic decays for $D_\rho$-wave states, $\rho-\lambda$ mixed configurations, and $\rho$-mode radially excited states in singly charmed baryons of the flavor anti-triplet. Both experimental and model-dependent uncertainties are taken into account throughout our analysis.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper supplies the first quark-model branching ratios for radiative decays of Dρ-wave, mixed ρ-λ, and ρ-radial excited states in anti-triplet charmed baryons, offering concrete numbers that could help assign the Ξc(3055) and narrow options for the Ξc(3080).

read the letter

The main point is that the authors have calculated electromagnetic decay widths and branching ratios for the 1P, 1D, 2S, and 2P Λc states plus the 1D, 2S, and 2P Ξc states using a constituent quark model. They claim these ratios can confirm the LHCb Ξc(3055) assignment and distinguish whether the Ξc(3080) is the 1D 5/2+ or 2S 1/2+ state. This is the first time such calculations have been done for the Dρ-wave states, the ρ-λ mixed configurations, and the ρ-mode radial excitations in these flavor anti-triplet baryons. They include both experimental and model uncertainties in the results. The work is a straightforward extension of the standard non-relativistic quark model to these higher states, with transitions computed from second-shell excitations down to ground and P-wave finals. The numerical outputs are presented clearly enough that experimental groups could test them against data. The soft spot is the lack of any external check on the wave functions for these mixed D-wave cases. The model uses harmonic-oscillator forms and non-relativistic operators, and while the authors note parameter uncertainties, there is no comparison to lattice results or to measured radiative decays in analogous systems that would show whether the relative widths are reliable to the quoted precision. Small shifts in the oscillator parameters or relativistic corrections could reorder the dominant channels, and that possibility is not bounded. This paper is aimed at experimentalists sorting out overlapping charmed baryon resonances at LHCb or similar facilities. A reader who needs model predictions for branching ratios to guide state assignments will find usable numbers here. It deserves peer review because the calculations are new and scoped to observables that can be measured, even if the underlying model assumptions remain open to later scrutiny.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes electromagnetic decay widths and branching ratios for the 1P, 1D, 2S, and 2P states of Λ_c and the 1D, 2S, and 2P states of Ξ_c baryons in the flavor anti-triplet using the constituent quark model. It supplies numerical predictions for transitions from excited states to ground and P-wave final states, with the explicit goal of providing branching ratios that can confirm the LHCb assignment of Ξ_c(3055) and support possible J^P assignments (1D 5/2^+ or 2S 1/2^+) for Ξ_c(3080), including the first calculations for D_ρ-wave states and ρ-λ mixed configurations while propagating both experimental and model uncertainties.

Significance. If the results hold, the branching-ratio predictions would supply a practical experimental handle for resonance identification in singly charmed baryon spectroscopy, where mass and total width are often degenerate. The work's positive features include the explicit extension to previously uncalculated D_ρ-wave and mixed ρ-λ configurations together with a transparent treatment of uncertainties.

major comments (2)

[Results and Discussion] Abstract and Results section: the claim that the computed branching ratios 'can confirm the assignment of the Ξ_c(3055)' is load-bearing for the paper's central utility; this claim depends on the relative electromagnetic matrix elements for the 1D states being accurate to within the quoted uncertainties, yet the manuscript provides no external benchmark (e.g., comparison to measured radiative decays in analogous systems) for the non-relativistic operators applied to ρ-λ mixed D-wave wave functions.
[Model Description] Model and wave-function section: the treatment of ρ-λ mixing and the choice of oscillator parameters for the newly calculated D_ρ-wave states directly affects the predicted branching ratios to ground versus P-wave final states; without a sensitivity study or comparison to lattice or other model results for these configurations, the robustness of the Ξ_c(3080) assignment discussion remains open.

minor comments (2)

[Numerical Results] Tables of branching ratios: ensure that the notation distinguishing ρ-mode and λ-mode contributions is defined once and used consistently so that readers can trace which partial widths enter each quoted ratio.
[Introduction] Introduction: add explicit citations to the specific LHCb publications reporting the Ξ_c(3055) and Ξ_c(3080) mass and width measurements.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the detailed major comments, which highlight important aspects of model validation and robustness. We address each point below with honest responses and indicate the revisions we will make to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Results and Discussion] Abstract and Results section: the claim that the computed branching ratios 'can confirm the assignment of the Ξ_c(3055)' is load-bearing for the paper's central utility; this claim depends on the relative electromagnetic matrix elements for the 1D states being accurate to within the quoted uncertainties, yet the manuscript provides no external benchmark (e.g., comparison to measured radiative decays in analogous systems) for the non-relativistic operators applied to ρ-λ mixed D-wave wave functions.

Authors: We agree that the lack of direct external benchmarks for the ρ-λ mixed D-wave states is a limitation, as these are the first calculations of this type. The non-relativistic operators and constituent quark model framework have been validated in our earlier applications to P-wave radiative decays and analogous systems with available data. To address the concern, we will revise the abstract and results section to moderate the language from 'can confirm' to 'can help confirm' or 'provide supporting evidence for', and add a short paragraph discussing the model's track record on known transitions. This constitutes a partial revision that qualifies the claims without overstating the novelty. revision: partial
Referee: [Model Description] Model and wave-function section: the treatment of ρ-λ mixing and the choice of oscillator parameters for the newly calculated D_ρ-wave states directly affects the predicted branching ratios to ground versus P-wave final states; without a sensitivity study or comparison to lattice or other model results for these configurations, the robustness of the Ξ_c(3080) assignment discussion remains open.

Authors: The oscillator parameters are chosen to reproduce the observed mass spectrum of the relevant Λ_c and Ξ_c states, consistent with standard practice in the constituent quark model for these baryons. The ρ-λ mixing is implemented via the usual basis transformation in the harmonic oscillator framework. We acknowledge that an explicit sensitivity study is absent; however, the model uncertainties quoted in the paper already reflect parameter variations. In revision we will expand the model section to state the specific parameter values, explain their determination from the mass fit, and note the stability of the branching ratios within the reported uncertainties. Direct lattice comparisons for these mixed excited configurations are not yet available in the literature, so we reference related lattice work on ground-state properties instead. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: branching ratios are direct numerical outputs from standard constituent quark model applied to new states

full rationale

The paper applies the constituent quark model to compute electromagnetic transition widths and branching ratios for the specified excited states of Lambda_c and Xi_c baryons, including first-time results for D_rho-wave and rho-lambda mixed configurations. The derivation consists of evaluating matrix elements of the EM operators between model wave functions for initial and final states, with no evidence that any claimed prediction reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-defined quantity, or load-bearing self-citation. The central results (branching ratios usable to confirm or support resonance assignments) are genuine model outputs rather than tautological renamings or forced statistical relations. No uniqueness theorems, ansatze smuggled via citation, or self-referential definitions appear in the provided derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculations rest on the constituent quark model assumptions for baryon structure and electromagnetic transitions.

free parameters (1)

quark masses and oscillator parameters
Standard fitted parameters in constituent quark models used to define spatial wave functions for the baryon states.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Baryons are three-quark states with assigned orbital angular momentum, spin, and flavor configurations corresponding to 1P, 1D, 2S, 2P labels.
Invoked to classify the initial and final states for the radiative transitions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5632 in / 1311 out tokens · 40477 ms · 2026-05-15T04:47:23.410027+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

158 extracted references · 158 canonical work pages

[1]

The spectroscopy of singly charmed baryons has been studied within different theoretical frameworks

observed four Ξ ′+ c states with high significance. The spectroscopy of singly charmed baryons has been studied within different theoretical frameworks. In par- ticular, QCD sum rules was employed in Ref. [29], boot- strap quark models in Ref. [30], and heavy-quark sym- metry corrections in Ref. [31]. Lattice QCD, chiral per- turbation theory, and relativ...

work page 1999
[2]

Assignment of theΞ c(3055)+,0 baryon Following the recent determination of the spin-parity of the Ξc(3055)+,0 baryons by the LHCb Collaboration [3], we discuss the interpretation of this state based on the theory found in Ref. [98]. The Ξc(3055)+,0 is identified as aD λ-wave excitation with quantum numbersJ P = 3/2+ and spinS= 1/2, belonging to the flavor...

work page
[3]

Γ em[Ξc(3118)+ →Ξ + c γ] = 49+9 −8 keV, Γem[Ξc(3055)+ →Ξ + c γ] = 43+8 −8 keV,

work page
[4]

Γ em[Ξc(3118)+ →Ξ ′+ c γ] = 10+5 −4 keV, Γem[Ξc(3055)+ →Ξ ′+ c γ] = 5+2 −2 keV,

work page
[5]

Γ em[Ξc(3118)+ →Ξ ∗+ c γ] = 2.5+1.4 −1.0 keV, Γem[Ξc(3055)+ →Ξ ∗+ c γ] = 1.1+0.4 −0.4 keV,

work page
[6]

Γ em[Ξc(3118)+ →Ξ + c 2Pλ,1/2 γ] = 34+22 −21 keV, Γem[Ξc(3055)+ →Ξ + c 2Pλ,1/2 γ] = 34+21 −21 keV,

work page
[7]

Γ em[Ξc(3118)+ →Ξ + c 4Pλ,3/2 γ] = 7+4 −4 keV, Γem[Ξc(3055)+ →Ξ + c 4Pλ,3/2 γ] = 6+3 −3 keV,

work page
[8]

Γ em[Ξc(3118)+ →Ξ ′+ c 2Pλ,1/2 γ] = 2.0 +1.4 −0.9 keV, Γem[Ξc(3055)+ →Ξ ′+ c 2Pλ,1/2 γ] = 0.4 +0.1 −0.1 keV,

work page
[9]

Γ em[Ξc(3118)+ →Ξ ∗+ c 4Pλ,1/2 γ] = 2.5 +3.1 −1.7 keV, Γem[Ξc(3055)+ →Ξ ∗+ c 4Pλ,1/2 γ] = 0.5 +0.2 −0.2 keV,

work page
[10]

Γ em[Ξc(3118)+ →Ξ ′+ c 2Pλ,3/2 γ] = 1.5 +1.2 −0.8 keV, Γem[Ξc(3055)+ →Ξ ′+ c 2Pλ,3/2 γ] = 0.12 +0.03 −0.03 keV,

work page
[11]

•Ξ c(3055)0

Γ em[Ξc(3118)+ →Ξ ∗+ c 4Pλ,3/2 γ] = 0.3 +0.4 −0.2 keV, Γem[Ξc(3055)+ →Ξ ∗+ c 4Pλ,3/2 γ] = 0.02 +0.01 −0.01 keV. •Ξ c(3055)0

work page
[12]

Γ em[Ξc(3118)0 →Ξ 0 c γ] = 22+8 −8 keV, Γem[Ξc(3055)0 →Ξ 0 c γ] = 20+8 −8 keV,

work page
[13]

Γ em[Ξc(3118)0 →Ξ ′0 c γ] = 0.2+0.2 −0.1 keV, Γem[Ξc(3055)0 →Ξ ′0 c γ] = 0.1+0.1 −0.1 keV,

work page
[14]

Γ em[Ξc(3118)0 →Ξ ∗0 c γ] = 0.1+0.0 −0.0 keV , Γem[Ξc(3055)0 →Ξ ∗0 c γ] = 0.02+0.0 −0.0 keV ,

work page
[15]

Γ em[Ξc(3118)0 →Ξ 0 c 2Pλ,1/2 γ] = 543+31 −32 keV, Γem[Ξc(3055)0 →Ξ 0 c 2Pλ,1/2 γ] = 495+30 −30 keV,

work page
[16]

Γ em[Ξc(3118)0 →Ξ 0 c 2Pλ,3/2 γ] = 74+5 −5 keV, Γem[Ξc(3055)0 →Ξ 0 c 2Pλ,3/2 γ] = 65+5 −5 keV,

work page
[17]

With these decay widths we can get several branching ratios

Γ em[Ξc(3118)0 →Ξ ′0 c 4Pλ,1/2 γ] = 0.1 +0.1 −0.0 keV, Γem[Ξc(3055)0 →Ξ ′0 c 4Pλ,1/2 γ] = 0.01 +0.0 −0.0 keV. With these decay widths we can get several branching ratios. If we analyze, for example the following cases Γem[Ξc(3055)→Ξ + c γ] Γem[Ξc(3055)→Ξ ′+c γ] = 8.6+1.2 −1.2 ,(8) Γem[Ξc(3055)→Ξ + c γ] Γem[Ξc(3055)→Ξ ∗+c γ] = 39+5 −5 ,(9) Γem[Ξc(3055)→Ξ ′...

work page
[18]

In particular, the theoret- ical study of Ref

Assignment of theΞ c(3080)+,0 baryon The identification of the Ξ c(3055)+,0 baryons by the LHCb Collaboration as 1Dstates withJ P = 3/2 + [3] provides valuable insight into the interpretation of the nearby Ξ c(3080)+,0 states. In particular, the theoret- ical study of Ref. [98] predicts a mass splitting of ap- proximately 30 MeV between the 1DJ P = 3/2 + ...

work page
[19]

Γ em[Ξc(3163)+ →Ξ + c γ] = 61+8 −7 keV, Γem[Ξc(3080)+ →Ξ + c γ] = 51+8 −8 keV, 11

work page
[20]

Γ em[Ξc(3163)+ →Ξ ′+ c γ] = 14+7 −6 keV, Γem[Ξc(3080)+ →Ξ ′+ c γ] = 6+2 −2 keV,

work page
[21]

Γ em[Ξc(3163)+ →Ξ ∗+ c γ] = 4.0+2.0 −1.7 keV, Γem[Ξc(3080)+ →Ξ ∗+ c γ] = 1.4+0.8 −1.0 keV,

work page
[22]

Γ em[Ξc(3163)+ →Ξ + c 2Pλ,1/2 γ] = 0.2 +0.1 −0.1 keV, Γem[Ξc(3080)+ →Ξ + c 2Pλ,1/2 γ] = 0.05 +0.02 −0.02 keV,

work page
[23]

Γ em[Ξc(3163)+ →Ξ + c 2Pλ,3/2 γ] = 31+24 −22 keV, Γem[Ξc(3080)+ →Ξ + c 2Pλ,3/2 γ] = 36+8 −8 keV,

work page
[24]

Γ em[Ξc(3163)+ →Ξ ′+ c 2Pλ,1/2 γ] = 8+4 −3 keV, Γem[Ξc(3080)+ →Ξ ′+ c 2Pλ,1/2 γ] = 1.5 +1.0 −0.9 keV,

work page
[25]

Γ em[Ξc(3163)+ →Ξ ′+ c 4Pλ,1/2 γ] = 0.5 +0.5 −0.3 keV, Γem[Ξc(3080)+ →Ξ ′+ c 4Pλ,1/2 γ] = 0.1 +0.1 −0.1 keV,

work page
[26]

Γ em[Ξc(3163)+ →Ξ ′+ c 2Pλ,3/2 γ] = 4.7 +2.9 −2.1 keV, Γem[Ξc(3080)+ →Ξ ′+ c 2Pλ,3/2 γ] = 0.3 +0.1 −0.1 keV,

work page
[27]

Γ em[Ξc(3163)+ →Ξ ′+ c 4Pλ,3/2 γ] = 1.7 +1.2 −0.8 keV, Γem[Ξc(3080)+ →Ξ ′+ c 4Pλ,3/2 γ] = 0.3 +0.1 −0.1 keV,

work page
[28]

•Ξ c(3080)0 asJ P = 5/2+

Γ em[Ξc(3163)+ →Ξ ′+ c 4Pλ,5/2 γ] = 0.6 +0.6 −0.4 keV, Γem[Ξc(3080)+ →Ξ ′+ c 4Pλ,5/2 γ] = 0.1 +0.1 −0.1 keV. •Ξ c(3080)0 asJ P = 5/2+

work page
[29]

Γ em[Ξc(3163)0 →Ξ 0 c γ] = 18+7 −8 keV, Γem[Ξc(3080)0 →Ξ 0 c γ] = 17+8 −8 keV,

work page
[30]

Γ em[Ξc(3163)0 →Ξ ′0 c γ] = 0.3+0.2 −0.2 keV, Γem[Ξc(3080)0 →Ξ ′0 c γ] = 0.13+0.1 −0.1 keV,

work page
[31]

Γ em[Ξc(3163)0 →Ξ ∗0 c γ] = 0.1+0.7 −0.7 keV , Γem[Ξc(3080)0 →Ξ ∗0 c γ] = 0.05+0.0 −0.0 keV ,

work page
[32]

Γ em[Ξc(3163)0 →Ξ 0 c 2Pλ,1/2 γ] = 2.3+0.7 −0.7 keV, Γem[Ξc(3080)0 →Ξ 0 c 2Pλ,1/2 γ] = 0.7+0.2 −0.2 keV,

work page
[33]

Γ em[Ξc(3163)0 →Ξ 0 c 2Pλ,3/2 γ] = 673+41 −42 keV, Γem[Ξc(3080)0 →Ξ 0 c 2Pλ,3/2 γ] = 586+35 −35 keV,

work page
[34]

Γ em[Ξc(3163)0 →Ξ ′0 c 2Pλ,1/2 γ] = 0.2 +0.1 −0.1 keV, Γem[Ξc(3080)0 →Ξ ′0 c 2Pλ,1/2 γ] = 0.03 +0.01 −0.01 keV. From our previous results, we observe that the theoreti- cal predictions for the electromagnetic decay widths are essentially independent of the mass once the uncertain- ties in the calculation, estimated through the bootstrap Monte Carlo method...

work page
[35]

Γ em[Ξc(3080)+ →Ξ + c γ] = 0.2+0.1 −0.1 keV,

work page
[36]

Γ em[Ξc(3080)+ →Ξ ′+ c γ] = 15+5 −5 keV,

work page
[37]

Γ em[Ξc(3080)+ →Ξ ∗+ c γ] = 3.5+1 −1 keV,

work page
[38]

Γ em[Ξc(3080)+ →Ξ + c 2Pλ,1/2 γ] = 10.7 +3 −3 keV,

work page
[39]

Γ em[Ξc(3080)+ →Ξ + c 2Pλ,3/2 γ] = 36+4 −4 keV,

work page
[40]

Γ em[Ξc(3080)+ →Ξ ′+ c 2Pλ,1/2 γ] = 6.6+2 −2 keV,

work page
[41]

Γ em[Ξc(3080)+ →Ξ ′+ c 4Pλ,1/2 γ] = 0.02 +0.01 −0.01 keV,

work page
[42]

Γ em[Ξc(3080)+ →Ξ ′+ c 2Pλ,3/2 γ] = 6+1 −1 keV,

work page
[43]

Γ em[Ξc(3080)+ →Ξ ′+ c 4Pλ,3/2 γ] = 0.02 +0.01 −0.01 keV,

work page
[44]

•Ξ c(3080)0 asJ P = 1/2+

Γ em[Ξc(3080)+ →Ξ ′+ c 4Pλ,5/2 γ] = 0.1 +0.1 −0.1 keV. •Ξ c(3080)0 asJ P = 1/2+

work page
[45]

Γ em[Ξc(3080)0 →Ξ 0 c γ] = 0.2+0.1 −0.1 keV,

work page
[46]

Γ em[Ξc(3080)0 →Ξ ′0 c γ] = 0.3+0.1 −0.1 keV,

work page
[47]

Γ em[Ξc(3080)0 →Ξ ∗0 c γ] = 0.07+0.02 −0.02 keV ,

work page
[48]

Γ em[Ξc(3080)0 →Ξ 0 c 2Pλ,1/2 γ] = 266+30 −30 keV,

work page
[49]

Γ em[Ξc(3080)0 →Ξ 0 c 2Pλ,3/2 γ] = 91+28 −28 keV, 12

work page
[50]

Γ em[Ξc(3080)0 →Ξ ′0 c 2Pλ,1/2 γ] = 0.13 +0.04 −0.04 keV. To help discriminate between these possible config- urations, it is useful to compare the corresponding branching-ratio predictions, which may provide guidance for future experimental studies: Γem[Ξc(3080)→Ξ + c γ] Γem[Ξc(3080)→Ξ ′+c γ] = 0.013+0.003 −0.003 ,(18) Γem[Ξc(3080)→Ξ + c γ] Γem[Ξc(3080)→...

work page
[51]

Determination of the Λ + c spin via the reactione +e− →Λ + c ¯Λ− c .Phys

Medina Ablikim et al. Determination of the Λ + c spin via the reactione +e− →Λ + c ¯Λ− c .Phys. Rev. D, 103(9): L091101, 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.L091101

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.l091101 2021
[52]

T. J. Moon et al. First determination of the spin and parity of the charmed-strange baryon Ξ c(2970)+. Phys. Rev. D, 103(11):L111101, 2021. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.103.L111101

work page 2021
[53]

First Determination of the Spin- Parity of Ξc(3055)+,0 Baryons.Phys

Roel Aaij et al. First Determination of the Spin- Parity of Ξc(3055)+,0 Baryons.Phys. Rev. Lett., 134(8): 081901, 2025. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.081901

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.081901 2025
[54]

Observation of excited Ω 0 c baryons in Ω− b →Ξ + c K −π−decays.Phys

Roel Aaij et al. Observation of excited Ω 0 c baryons in Ω− b →Ξ + c K −π−decays.Phys. Rev. D, 104(9):L091102,

work page
[55]

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L091102

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.l091102
[57]

D´ avila-Rivera, H

A. D´ avila-Rivera, H. Garc´ ıa-Tecocoatzi, A. Ramirez- Morales, Ailier Rivero-Acosta, E. Santopinto, and Car- los Alberto Vaquera-Araujo. Radiative decays of the Σc, Ξ′ c and Ωc charmed baryons. 12 2025

work page 2025
[58]

Baryon spec- troscopy.Reviews of Modern Physics, 82(2):1095–1153, 2010

Eberhard Klempt and Jean-Marc Richard. Baryon spec- troscopy.Reviews of Modern Physics, 82(2):1095–1153, 2010

work page 2010
[59]

Charmed baryon physics circa 2021

Hai-Yang Cheng. Charmed baryon physics circa 2021. Chinese Journal of Physics, 78:324–362, 2022

work page 2021
[60]

A review of the open charm and open bottom systems.Reports on Progress in Physics, 80(7): 076201, 2017

Hua-Xing Chen, Wei Chen, Xiang Liu, Yan-Rui Liu, and Shi-Lin Zhu. A review of the open charm and open bottom systems.Reports on Progress in Physics, 80(7): 076201, 2017

work page 2017
[61]

E. G. Cazzoli, A. M. Cnops, P. L. Connolly, R. I. Louttit, M. J. Murtagh, R. B. Palmer, N. P. Samios, T. T. Tso, and H. H. Williams. Evidence for ∆S= −∆QCurrents or Charmed-Baryon Production by Neu- trinos.Phys. Rev. Lett., 34:1125–1128, 1975. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.34.1125

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.34.1125 1975
[62]

Knapp et al

B. Knapp et al. Observation of a Narrow Antibaryon State at 2.26 GeV/c 2.Phys. Rev. Lett., 37:882, 1976. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.37.882

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.37.882 1976
[63]

Calicchio et al

M. Calicchio et al. First Observation of the Production and Decay of the Σ + c .Phys. Lett. B, 93:521–524, 1980. doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(80)90379-2

work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90379-2 1980
[64]

S. F. Biagi et al. Observation of a Narrow State at 2.46 GeV/c 2: A Candidate for the Charmed Strange BaryonA +.Phys. Lett. B, 122:455, 1983. doi: 10.1016/ 0370-2693(83)91601-5

work page 1983
[65]

S. F. Biagi et al. Properties of the Charmed Strange BaryonA + and Evidence for the Charmed Doubly Strange BaryonT 0 at 2.74 GeV/c 2.Z. Phys. C, 28: 175, 1985. doi: 10.1007/BF01575721

work page doi:10.1007/bf01575721 1985
[66]

Albrecht et al

H. Albrecht et al. Observation of a new charmed baryon.Phys. Lett. B, 317:227–232, 1993. doi: 10.1016/ 0370-2693(93)91598-H

work page 1993
[67]

K. W. Edwards et al. Observation of excited charmed baryon states decaying to Λ + c π+π−.Phys. Rev. Lett., 74:3331–3335, 1995. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74. 3331

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74 1995
[68]

Albrecht et al

H. Albrecht et al. Evidence for Λ c(2593)+ produc- tion.Phys. Lett. B, 402:207–212, 1997. doi: 10.1016/ S0370-2693(97)00503-0

work page 1997
[69]

J. P. Alexander et al. Evidence of new states decaying into Ξ ∗ c π.Phys. Rev. Lett., 83:3390–3393, 1999. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3390

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3390 1999
[70]

Artuso et al

M. Artuso et al. Observation of new states decaying into Λ + c π−π+.Phys. Rev. Lett., 86:4479–4482, 2001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4479

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.4479 2001
[71]

S. E. Csorna et al. Evidence of new states decaying into Ξ ′ cπ.Phys. Rev. Lett., 86:4243–4246, 2001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4243

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.4243 2001
[72]

Chistov et al

R. Chistov et al. Observation of new states decaying into Λ + c K −π+ and Λ + c K 0 Sπ− .Phys. Rev. Lett., 97: 162001, 2006. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.162001

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.162001 2006
[73]

Lesiak et al

T. Lesiak et al. Measurement of masses of the Ξ c(2645) and Ξ c(2815) baryons and observation of Ξ c(2980)→ Ξc(2645)π.Phys. Lett. B, 665:9–15, 2008. doi: 10.1016/ j.physletb.2008.05.055

work page 2008
[75]

REFERENCES19 117.061102

R. Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration]. Observation of five new narrow Ω 0 c states decaying to Ξ + c K −.Phys. Rev. Lett., 118(18):182001, 2017. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 118.182001

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2017
[76]

Yelton et al

J. Yelton et al. Observation of Excited Ω c Charmed Baryons ine +e− Collisions.Phys. Rev. D, 97(5):051102,

work page
[77]

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.051102

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.051102
[78]

Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration]

R. Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration]. Observation of New Ξ0 c Baryons Decaying to Λ + c K −.Phys. Rev. Lett., 124(22):222001, 2020. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124. 222001

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124 2020
[79]

Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration]

R. Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration]. Observation of New Ω 0 c States Decaying to the Ξ + c K − Final State. Phys. Rev. Lett., 131(13):131902, 2023. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.131.131902

work page 2023
[80]

Observation of a New Charmed Baryon Decaying to Ξ+ c π−π+.Phys

Roel Aaij et al. Observation of a New Charmed Baryon Decaying to Ξ+ c π−π+.Phys. Rev. Lett., 135(16):161901,

work page
[81]

doi: 10.1103/gghl-m6fm

work page doi:10.1103/gghl-m6fm
[82]

Groote, J

S. Groote, J. G. Korner, and Oleg I. Yakovlev. QCD sum rules for heavy baryons at next-to-leading order in αs .Phys. Rev. D, 55:3016–3026, 1997. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.55.3016

work page 1997

Showing first 80 references.