pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13958 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Baryoid Dark Matter from mathbb{Z}_N Domain Walls: The (N-1):1 origin of the dark matter-baryon coincidence

Yang Bai , Ting-Kuo Chen
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords baryoid dark matterZ_N domain wallsdark matter-baryon coincidenceQCD phase transitionbaryon trappingcompact baryonic objectsearly universe domain wallsasteroid mass dark matter
0
0 comments X

The pith

Collapsing Z_N domain walls trap baryons into compact baryoids whose number ratio to ordinary matter is fixed at (N-1):1.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that a discrete Z_N symmetry in the early universe produces domain walls that, after the QCD phase transition, collapse and concentrate baryons into dense asteroid-mass objects called baryoids. These baryoids serve as dark matter, and the collapse dynamics starting from equal baryon numbers per domain automatically produce a baryon-number ratio of (N-1):1 between the false-vacuum and true-vacuum regions. Because baryons are slightly lighter in the false-vacuum domains, the resulting energy-density ratio is close to but slightly below (N-1):1, yielding 6:1 for N=7 and thereby accounting for the observed dark-matter-to-baryon abundance without extra tuning. A sympathetic reader cares because the mechanism derives the coincidence directly from domain-wall collapse and the mild vacuum-dependent mass shift rather than from unrelated production mechanisms.

Core claim

Starting from equal baryon numbers in the domains formed in the early universe, the collapse of the domain walls after the QCD phase transition leads to a baryon-number ratio of (N-1):1 between the false- and true-vacuum domains. Since baryons are slightly lighter in the false-vacuum domains than in the true-vacuum domain, the resulting dark matter-to-baryon energy-density ratio is naturally close to, but slightly smaller than, (N-1):1, or 6:1 for N=7. The baryoids that form are compact objects of asteroid-scale mass and nuclear-scale density that can account for the dark matter.

What carries the argument

Collapsing Z_N domain walls that trap baryons into compact baryoids, enforcing the (N-1):1 number ratio between false- and true-vacuum regions.

If this is right

  • Baryoids have asteroid-scale masses and nuclear-scale densities and can serve as dark-matter candidates.
  • The dark-matter-to-baryon ratio is fixed near (N-1):1 by the domain structure for any chosen N.
  • Domain-wall dynamics determine the baryon-trapping efficiency and the final baryoid mass and density.
  • For N=7 the predicted energy-density ratio is 6:1, slightly above the observed value due to the vacuum mass difference.
  • The scenario predicts a broad set of phenomenological probes for these compact objects.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Searches for asteroid-mass gravitational lenses or solar-system encounters could directly test the predicted baryoid population.
  • The same domain-wall trapping idea could be applied to other discrete symmetries to produce different classes of compact dark-matter objects.
  • The required small mass splitting between vacua might be tied to the details of the QCD transition or other symmetry-breaking scales.
  • Confirmation would imply that a discrete Z_N symmetry was active and broken after the QCD epoch.

Load-bearing premise

Baryons have slightly lower mass in the false-vacuum domains than in the true-vacuum domains.

What would settle it

A precise measurement of the dark-matter-to-baryon density ratio exactly equal to 6 for an N=7 model, or the absence of asteroid-mass compact objects with nuclear density in gravitational-lensing or solar-system surveys.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13958 by Ting-Kuo Chen, Yang Bai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A schematic illustration of the baryoid explanation for the dark matter-baryon coinci [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic L(t) and v(t) profiles of an expanding frustrated domain wall network. The wall evolution begins in the stretching regime, transits to the Kibble regime at t = tK, and finally enters the scaling regime at t ∼ tsc. We also show the Hubble length scale H−1 (t) in the left panel for comparison. Next, to avoid contradicting astrophysical and cosmological observations such as the BBN measurements, we … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A schematic plot of the relation between the wall tension [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The 1 − S(v) profiles against v and γ(v) with the parameter choices ∆mB = 0, T = 15 MeV, and pz,th = 300, 500, 700 MeV [see Eq. (3.2)]. Note that S(v) is the baryon trapping rate in the false-vacuum pockets and correspondingly 1 − S(v) the leakage rate. We now examine the pressure balance conditions. We first denote the numbers and chem￾ical potentials of electrons, protons, and neutrons inside a baryoid b… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The P 0 e (T) and Vbias + s σ(T)/R(T) (top row), R(T) (middle row), and v(T) (bottom row) profiles in the late stage of the collapse for benchmarks I (left column) and II (right column), respectively. The vertical dashed lines denote T = TF. For details of the benchmarks, see main text and Eqs. (3.4) and (3.9). Before concluding this section, we comment on a few potential issues. The first one is the possi… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The phenomenological constraints on and future sensitivities to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose an explanation for the dark matter-baryon coincidence based on collapsing $\mathbb{Z}_N$ domain walls, which form a novel compact baryonic state: the baryoid. A baryoid has an asteroid-scale mass and up-to-nuclear-scale energy density, and can serve as a dark matter candidate. Starting from equal baryon numbers in the domains formed in the early universe, the collapse of the domain walls after the QCD phase transition leads to a baryon-number ratio of $(N-1):1$ between the false- and true-vacuum domains. Since baryons are slightly lighter in the false-vacuum domains than in the true-vacuum domain, the resulting dark matter-to-baryon energy-density ratio is naturally close to, but slightly smaller than, $(N-1):1$, or $6:1$ for $N=7$. We calculate the domain-wall dynamics and the efficiency of baryon-number trapping, derive the resulting baryoid properties, and discuss a broad set of phenomenological probes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an explanation for the dark matter-baryon coincidence using collapsing Z_N domain walls that form compact baryonic states termed baryoids. Starting from equal baryon numbers in early universe domains, wall collapse after QCD transition yields a (N-1):1 baryon-number ratio between false- and true-vacuum domains. Baryons being slightly lighter in false-vacuum domains makes the energy-density ratio naturally close to but smaller than (N-1):1, e.g. 6:1 for N=7. The paper calculates domain-wall dynamics, baryon trapping efficiency, derives baryoid properties, and discusses phenomenological probes.

Significance. Should the central mechanism and mass difference be rigorously derived, the result would offer a compelling, low-parameter explanation for the observed dark matter to baryon density ratio of approximately 5:1. It introduces a new dark matter candidate with distinctive properties (asteroid mass, nuclear density) arising from standard model extensions with discrete symmetries, potentially linking cosmology, particle physics, and astrophysics through testable predictions.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and main text discussion of baryon masses] The claim that baryons are slightly lighter in the false-vacuum domains than in the true-vacuum domain is presented as a fact enabling the 'naturally close to but slightly smaller' ratio, but no explicit derivation, Lagrangian term, or calculation from the Z_N-breaking sector is provided. This assumption is load-bearing for the coincidence explanation and requires a concrete model section to establish independence from the target ratio.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation and definitions] The term 'baryoid' is introduced as a novel compact state; a clear definition with mass and density estimates should be highlighted early, perhaps with a dedicated subsection.
  2. [Calculations] While the abstract states that domain-wall dynamics and trapping efficiency are calculated, specific equations, numerical methods, or error estimates should be explicitly referenced and numbered in the main text for verification.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We appreciate the recognition of the proposal's potential significance and address the major comment below. We will revise the manuscript to incorporate a concrete model section deriving the baryon mass difference.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and main text discussion of baryon masses] The claim that baryons are slightly lighter in the false-vacuum domains than in the true-vacuum domain is presented as a fact enabling the 'naturally close to but slightly smaller' ratio, but no explicit derivation, Lagrangian term, or calculation from the Z_N-breaking sector is provided. This assumption is load-bearing for the coincidence explanation and requires a concrete model section to establish independence from the target ratio.

    Authors: We agree that the current presentation assumes the small baryon mass difference without an explicit derivation from the Z_N-breaking sector, and that this requires strengthening for robustness. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection (e.g., Sec. 2.3) that introduces a concrete Z_N-breaking Lagrangian. We consider a complex scalar Phi with potential V(Phi) = lambda (|Phi|^2 - v^2)^2 + epsilon Re(Phi^N) that breaks Z_N explicitly but softly. A Yukawa-like coupling g Phi bar psi psi to the baryon field psi then yields vacuum-dependent effective masses m_eff = m_0 + g v cos(2 pi k / N). For adjacent vacua the resulting Delta m / m is naturally O(10^{-2}) and independent of the observed 5:1 ratio; we will show analytically and numerically that the energy-density ratio remains close to but below (N-1):1 for a broad parameter range. This addition removes the load-bearing assumption while preserving the mechanism's economy. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: (N-1):1 ratio derived from domain collapse dynamics independent of observed value

full rationale

The paper starts from equal baryon numbers across Z_N domains and derives the (N-1):1 number ratio explicitly from post-QCD domain-wall collapse and baryon trapping efficiency, as described in the abstract. This follows from the calculated wall dynamics without presupposing the target energy-density ratio. The statement that baryons are slightly lighter in false-vacuum domains is an additional physical input used to adjust the energy-density ratio slightly below the number ratio; it does not redefine or fit the central (N-1):1 result. No equation reduces the claimed prediction to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction, and the illustrative choice of N=7 does not alter the independence of the dynamical derivation. The mechanism is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model introduces the new entity 'baryoid' and relies on assumptions about initial baryon equality and post-QCD collapse timing; N is selected to match the observed ratio.

free parameters (1)
  • N = 7
    Integer chosen so (N-1):1 approximates the observed dark-matter-to-baryon ratio; N=7 yields ~6:1
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Equal initial baryon number in all domains
    Starting condition before domain-wall collapse
  • domain assumption Domain walls collapse after the QCD phase transition
    Required for baryon trapping and vacuum-dependent mass difference to apply
invented entities (1)
  • baryoid no independent evidence
    purpose: Compact asteroid-mass dark-matter candidate formed from collapsed domain walls
    New postulated state with nuclear-scale density

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5495 in / 1452 out tokens · 59483 ms · 2026-05-15T02:33:19.018065+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 91 canonical work pages · 41 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6, [ arXiv:1807.06209]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    Review of asymmetric dark matter

    K. Petraki and R. R. Volkas, Review of asymmetric dark matter , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28 (2013) 1330028, [ arXiv:1305.4939]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  3. [3]

    Mirror matter-type dark matter

    R. Foot, Mirror matter-type dark matter , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 13 (2004) 2161–2192, [astro-ph/0407623]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  4. [4]

    The Scale of Dark QCD

    Y. Bai and P. Schwaller, Scale of dark QCD , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014), no. 6 063522, [arXiv:1306.4676]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  5. [5]

    A. C. Ritter and R. R. Volkas, Explaining the cosmological dark matter coincidence in asymmetric dark QCD , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 1 015032, [ arXiv:2404.05999]

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Brzeminski and A

    D. Brzeminski and A. Hook, A Dynamical Explanation of the Dark Matter-Baryon Coincidence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024), no. 20 201001, [ arXiv:2310.07777]

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Banerjee, D

    A. Banerjee, D. Brzeminski, and A. Hook, Predicting the Dark Matter – Baryon Abundance Ratio, arXiv:2410.22412

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    Witten, Cosmic Separation of Phases , Phys

    E. Witten, Cosmic Separation of Phases , Phys. Rev. D 30 (1984) 272–285

    work page 1984

  9. [9]

    Y. Aoki, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and K. K. Szabo, The Order of the quantum chromodynamics transition predicted by the standard model of particle physics , Nature 443 (2006) 675–678, [ hep-lat/0611014]. 37

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  10. [10]

    The QCD phase transition with physical-mass, chiral quarks

    T. Bhattacharya et al., QCD Phase Transition with Chiral Quarks and Physical Quark Masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014), no. 8 082001, [ arXiv:1402.5175]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  11. [11]

    Bai and T.-K

    Y. Bai and T.-K. Chen, Approaching stable quark matter , Eur. Phys. J. C 86 (2026), no. 2 147, [ arXiv:2410.19678]

    work page arXiv 2026

  12. [12]

    Bai and T.-K

    Y. Bai and T.-K. Chen, Excluding Stable Quark Matter: Insights from the QCD Vacuum Energy, arXiv:2502.20241

    work page arXiv

  13. [13]

    Quark matter may not be strange

    B. Holdom, J. Ren, and C. Zhang, Quark matter may not be strange , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018), no. 22 222001, [ arXiv:1707.06610]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    A. R. Zhitnitsky, ’Nonbaryonic’ dark matter as baryonic color superconductor , JCAP 10 (2003) 010, [ hep-ph/0202161]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  15. [15]

    Six Flavor Quark Matter

    Y. Bai and A. J. Long, Six Flavor Quark Matter , JHEP 06 (2018) 072, [arXiv:1804.10249]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Bai and M

    Y. Bai and M. Korwar, Cosmological constraints on first-order phase transitions , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 9 095015, [ arXiv:2109.14765]

    work page arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Bringmann, P

    T. Bringmann, P. F. Depta, T. Konstandin, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, and C. Tasillo, Does NANOGrav observe a dark sector phase transition? , JCAP 11 (2023) 053, [arXiv:2306.09411]

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Bai, T.-K

    Y. Bai, T.-K. Chen, and M. Korwar, QCD-collapsed domain walls: QCD phase transition and gravitational wave spectroscopy, JHEP 12 (2023) 194, [ arXiv:2306.17160]

    work page arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Lee, U.-G

    D. Lee, U.-G. Meißner, K. A. Olive, M. Shifman, and T. Vonk, θ -dependence of light nuclei and nucleosynthesis , Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2020), no. 3 033392, [ arXiv:2006.12321]

    work page arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    C. J. A. P. Martins, I. Y. Rybak, A. Avgoustidis, and E. P. S. Shellard, Extending the velocity-dependent one-scale model for domain walls , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016), no. 4 043534, [arXiv:1602.01322]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  21. [21]

    Axion cosmology with long-lived domain walls

    T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki, K. Saikawa, and T. Sekiguchi, Axion cosmology with long-lived domain walls , JCAP 01 (2013) 001, [ arXiv:1207.3166]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  22. [22]

    Axion dark matter from topological defects

    M. Kawasaki, K. Saikawa, and T. Sekiguchi, Axion dark matter from topological defects , Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015), no. 6 065014, [ arXiv:1412.0789]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  23. [23]

    A. Hook, R. Mondal, and S. Mukherjee, Putting the Brakes on Axion Strings: Friction and Its Impact on the QCD Axion Abundance , arXiv:2603.00237

    work page arXiv

  24. [24]

    Bhattacharya, A

    T. Bhattacharya, A. Gocksch, C. Korthals Altes, and R. D. Pisarski, Interface tension in an SU(N) gauge theory at high temperature , Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 998–1000

    work page 1991

  25. [25]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Phase Transitions in the Early Universe , Acta Phys. Polon. B 13 (1982) 723

    work page 1982

  26. [26]

    E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, The Early Universe , vol. 69. Taylor and Francis, 5, 2019

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Blasi, A

    S. Blasi, A. Mariotti, A. Rase, A. Sevrin, and K. Turbang, Friction on ALP domain walls and gravitational waves , JCAP 04 (2023) 008, [ arXiv:2210.14246]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Bagherian, M

    H. Bagherian, M. Ekhterachian, and S. Stelzl, The bearable inhomogeneity of the baryon asymmetry, JHEP 01 (2026) 068, [ arXiv:2505.15904]

    work page arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Alcock and E

    C. Alcock and E. Farhi, The Evaporation of Strange Matter in the Early Universe , Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 1273. 38

    work page 1985

  30. [30]

    Navas et al., Review of particle physics , Phys

    Particle Data Group Collaboration, S. Navas et al., Review of particle physics , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 3 030001

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Di Vecchia and G

    P. Di Vecchia and G. Veneziano, Chiral Dynamics in the Large n Limit , Nucl. Phys. B 171 (1980) 253–272

    work page 1980

  32. [32]

    Up and down quark masses and corrections to Dashen's theorem from lattice QCD and quenched QED

    Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S. Krieg, L. Lellouch, T. Lippert, A. Portelli, A. Sastre, K. K. Szabo, and L. Varnhorst, Up and down quark masses and corrections to Dashen’s theorem from lattice QCD and quenched QED , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016), no. 8 082001, [arXiv:1604.07112]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Electroweak Bubble Wall Speed Limit

    D. Bodeker and G. D. Moore, Electroweak Bubble Wall Speed Limit , JCAP 05 (2017) 025, [arXiv:1703.08215]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    Di Clemente, M

    F. Di Clemente, M. Casolino, A. Drago, M. Lattanzi, and C. Ratti, Strange quark matter as dark matter: 40 yr later, a reappraisal , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 537 (2025), no. 2 1056–1069, [arXiv:2404.12094]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Bramante, Very Heavy and Composite Dark Matter: Theory and Experimental Searches, arXiv:2602.23708

    J. Bramante, Very Heavy and Composite Dark Matter: Theory and Experimental Searches, arXiv:2602.23708

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    D. M. Jacobs, G. D. Starkman, and B. W. Lynn, Macro Dark Matter , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 450 (2015), no. 4 3418–3430, [ arXiv:1410.2236]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  37. [37]

    Reconsidering seismological constraints on the available parameter space of macroscopic dark matter

    D. Cyncynates, J. Chiel, J. Sidhu, and G. D. Starkman, Reconsidering seismological constraints on the available parameter space of macroscopic dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017), no. 6 063006, [ arXiv:1610.09680]. [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 129903 (2017)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    Singh Sidhu and G

    J. Singh Sidhu and G. D. Starkman, Reconsidering astrophysical constraints on macroscopic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 8 083503, [ arXiv:1912.04053]

    work page arXiv 2020

  39. [39]

    Sugiyama, M

    S. Sugiyama, M. Takada, N. Yasuda, and N. Tominaga, Microlensing constraints on Primordial Black Hole abundance with Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam observations of Andromeda, arXiv:2602.05840

    work page arXiv

  40. [40]

    Microlensing of X-ray Pulsars: a Method to Detect Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter

    Y. Bai and N. Orlofsky, Microlensing of X-ray Pulsars: a Method to Detect Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019), no. 12 123019, [ arXiv:1812.01427]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Tamta, N

    M. Tamta, N. Raj, and P. Sharma, Entering the window of primordial black hole dark matter with x-ray microlensing , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025), no. 4 043043, [arXiv:2405.20365]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Jiang, A

    S. Jiang, A. Yang, and F. P. Huang, Macroscopic Dark Matter under siege: from White Dwarf Data to Gravitational Wave Detection , arXiv:2511.23263

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    Paczynski, Gravitational microlensing by the galactic halo , Astrophys

    B. Paczynski, Gravitational microlensing by the galactic halo , Astrophys. J. 304 (1986) 1–5

    work page 1986

  44. [44]

    Griest, Galactic Microlensing as a Method of Detecting Massive Compact Halo Objects , Astrophys

    K. Griest, Galactic Microlensing as a Method of Detecting Massive Compact Halo Objects , Astrophys. J. 366 (1991) 412–421

    work page 1991

  45. [45]

    Limits on the Macho Content of the Galactic Halo from the EROS-2 Survey of the Magellanic Clouds

    EROS-2 Collaboration, P. Tisserand et al., Limits on the Macho Content of the Galactic Halo from the EROS-2 Survey of the Magellanic Clouds , Astron. Astrophys. 469 (2007) 387–404, [astro-ph/0607207]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  46. [46]

    The OGLE View of Microlensing towards the Magellanic Clouds. II. OGLE-II SMC data

    L. Wyrzykowski et al., The OGLE View of Microlensing towards the Magellanic Clouds. II. OGLE-II SMC data , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 407 (2010) 189–200, 39 [arXiv:1004.5247]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  47. [47]

    Black Hole, Neutron Star and White Dwarf Candidates from Microlensing with OGLE-III

    L. Wyrzykowski et al., Black Hole, Neutron Star and White Dwarf Candidates from Microlensing with OGLE-III , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 458 (2016), no. 3 3012–3026, [arXiv:1509.04899]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    OGLE-IV: Fourth Phase of the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment

    A. Udalski, M. K. Szyma´ nski, and G. Szyma´ nski,OGLE-IV: Fourth Phase of the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment, Acta Astron. 65 (2015), no. 1 1–38, [arXiv:1504.05966]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  49. [49]

    Mr´ oz et al.,Limits on Planetary-mass Primordial Black Holes from the OGLE High-cadence Survey of the Magellanic Clouds , Astrophys

    P. Mr´ oz et al.,Limits on Planetary-mass Primordial Black Holes from the OGLE High-cadence Survey of the Magellanic Clouds , Astrophys. J. Lett. 976 (2024), no. 1 L19, [arXiv:2410.06251]

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    I. A. Bond et al., Real-time difference imaging analysis of moa galactic bulge observations during 2000, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 327 (2001) 868, [ astro-ph/0102181]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  51. [51]

    Miyazaki, Y

    S. Miyazaki, Y. Komiyama, S. Kawanomoto, Y. Doi, H. Furusawa, T. Hamana, Y. Hayashi, H. Ikeda, Y. Kamata, H. Karoji, M. Koike, T. Kurakami, S. Miyama, T. Morokuma, F. Nakata, K. Namikawa, H. Nakaya, K. Nariai, Y. Obuchi, Y. Oishi, N. Okada, Y. Okura, P. Tait, T. Takata, Y. Tanaka, M. Tanaka, T. Terai, D. Tomono, F. Uraguchi, T. Usuda, Y. Utsumi, Y. Yamada...

    work page 2018

  52. [52]

    Komiyama, Y

    Y. Komiyama, Y. Obuchi, H. Nakaya, Y. Kamata, S. Kawanomoto, Y. Utsumi, S. Miyazaki, F. Uraguchi, H. Furusawa, T. Morokuma, T. Uchida, H. Miyatake, S. Mineo, H. Fujimori, H. Aihara, H. Karoji, J. E. Gunn, and S.-Y. Wang, Hyper Suprime-Cam: Camera dewar design , Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap. 70 (2018) S2

    work page 2018

  53. [53]

    Kawanomoto, F

    S. Kawanomoto, F. Uraguchi, Y. Komiyama, S. Miyazaki, H. Furusawa, F. Finet, T. Hattori, S.-Y. Wang, N. Yasuda, and N. Suzuki, Hyper Suprime-Cam: Filters , Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap. 70 (2018), no. 4 66

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Furusawa, M

    H. Furusawa, M. Koike, T. Takata, Y. Okura, H. Miyatake, R. H. Lupton, S. Bickerton, P. A. Price, J. Bosch, N. Yasuda, S. Mineo, Y. Yamada, S. Miyazaki, F. Nakata, S. Koshida, Y. Komiyama, Y. Utsumi, S. Kawanomoto, E. Jeschke, J. Noumaru, K. Schubert, I. Iwata, F. Finet, T. Fujiyoshi, A. Tajitsu, T. Terai, and C.-H. Lee, The on-site quality-assurance syst...

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    eXTP Collaboration, S. N. Zhang et al., eXTP – enhanced X-ray Timing and Polarimetry Mission, Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 9905 (2016) 99051Q, [ arXiv:1607.08823]

    work page arXiv 2016

  56. [56]

    STROBE-X Science Working Group Collaboration, P. S. Ray et al., STROBE-X: 40 X-ray Timing and Spectroscopy on Dynamical Timescales from Microseconds to Years , arXiv:1903.03035

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903

  57. [57]

    P. W. Graham, S. Rajendran, and J. Varela, Dark Matter Triggers of Supernovae , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015), no. 6 063007, [ arXiv:1505.04444]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  58. [58]

    P. W. Graham, R. Janish, V. Narayan, S. Rajendran, and P. Riggins, White Dwarfs as Dark Matter Detectors , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018), no. 11 115027, [ arXiv:1805.07381]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  59. [59]

    Madsen, Astrophysical Limits on the Flux of Quark Nuggets , Phys

    J. Madsen, Astrophysical Limits on the Flux of Quark Nuggets , Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 2909–2912

    work page 1988

  60. [60]

    A. L. Watts and S. Reddy, Magnetar oscillations pose challenges for strange stars , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 379 (2007) L63, [ astro-ph/0609364]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  61. [61]

    Search for Small-Mass Black Hole Dark Matter with Space-Based Gravitational Wave Detectors

    N. Seto and A. Cooray, Search for small-mass black hole dark matter with space-based gravitational wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 063512, [ astro-ph/0405216]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  62. [62]

    A. W. Adams and J. S. Bloom, Direct detection of dark matter with space-based laser interferometers, astro-ph/0405266

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [63]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    LISA Collaboration, P. Amaro-Seoane et al., Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, arXiv:1702.00786

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector

    TianQin Collaboration, J. Luo et al., TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016), no. 3 035010, [ arXiv:1512.02076]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  65. [65]

    Hu and Y.-L

    W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu, The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity , Natl. Sci. Rev. 4 (2017), no. 5 685–686

    work page 2017

  66. [66]

    E. T. Herrin, D. C. Rosenbaum, and V. L. Teplitz, Seismic search for strange quark nuggets, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 043511, [ astro-ph/0505584]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  67. [67]

    Non-collider searches for stable massive particles

    S. Burdin, M. Fairbairn, P. Mermod, D. Milstead, J. Pinfold, T. Sloan, and W. Taylor, Non-collider searches for stable massive particles , Phys. Rept. 582 (2015) 1–52, [arXiv:1410.1374]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  68. [68]

    Fernando, I

    B. Fernando, I. J. Daubar, C. Charalambous, P. M. Grindrod, A. Stott, A. Al Ateqi, D. Atri, S. Ceylan, J. Clinton, M. Fillingim, E. Hauber, J. R. Hill, T. Kawamura, J. Liu, A. Lucas, R. Lorenz, L. Ojha, C. Perrin, S. Piqueux, S. St¨ ahler, D. Tirsch, C. Wilson, N. W´ ojcicka, D. Giardini, P. Lognonn´ e, and W. B. Banerdt,A tectonic origin for the largest ...

    work page doi:10.1029/2023gl103619 2023

  69. [69]

    D. P. Theodosopoulos, K. Freese, C. Kelso, and P. Stengel, Projected Sensitivity of Paleo-Detectors to Dark Matter Effective Interactions with Nuclei , arXiv:2603.13629

    work page arXiv

  70. [70]

    P. B. Price and M. H. Salamon, Search for Supermassive Magnetic Monopoles Using Mica Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 1226–1229

    work page 1986

  71. [71]

    Burns, T

    A.-K. Burns, T. M. P. Tait, and M. Valli, PRyMordial: the first three minutes, within and beyond the standard model , Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024), no. 1 86, [ arXiv:2307.07061]

    work page arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    Reviving quark nuggets as a candidate for dark matter

    A. Atreya, A. Sarkar, and A. M. Srivastava, Reviving quark nuggets as a candidate for dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014), no. 4 045010, [ arXiv:1405.6492]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  73. [73]

    Singh Sidhu and G

    J. Singh Sidhu and G. Starkman, Macroscopic Dark Matter Constraints from Bolide 41 Camera Networks, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 12 123008, [ arXiv:1908.00557]

    work page arXiv 2019

  74. [74]

    J. G. Hills, Limitations on the masses of objects constituting the missing mass in the Galactic disk and the Galactic halo , Astron. J. 92 (1986) 595–599

    work page 1986

  75. [75]

    R. M. Howie, J. Paxman, P. A. Bland, M. C. Towner, M. Cupak, E. K. Sansom, and H. A. R. Devillepoix, How to build a continental scale fireball camera network , Exp. Astron. 43 (2017), no. 3 237–266

    work page 2017

  76. [76]

    Ramazanov, E

    S. Ramazanov, E. Babichev, D. Gorbunov, and A. Vikman, Beyond freeze-in: Dark matter via inverse phase transition and gravitational wave signal , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 6 063530, [ arXiv:2104.13722]

    work page arXiv 2022

  77. [77]

    Babichev, D

    E. Babichev, D. Gorbunov, S. Ramazanov, and A. Vikman, Gravitational shine of dark domain walls , JCAP 04 (2022), no. 04 028, [ arXiv:2112.12608]

    work page arXiv 2022

  78. [78]

    Dankovsky, S

    I. Dankovsky, S. Ramazanov, E. Babichev, D. Gorbunov, and A. Vikman, Numerical analysis of melting domain walls and their gravitational waves , JCAP 02 (2025) 064, [arXiv:2410.21971]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings , J. Phys. A 9 (1976) 1387–1398

    work page 1976

  80. [80]

    W. H. Zurek, Cosmological Experiments in Superfluid Helium? , Nature 317 (1985) 505–508

    work page 1985

Showing first 80 references.