arxiv: 2605.14092 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · ✦ hep-ph · nucl-th

Recognition: no theorem link

Matching collinear factorization with color-glass condensate for inclusive and exclusive deep inelastic scattering

Shohini Bhattacharya , Chuan-Qi He , Zhong-Bo Kang , Diego Padilla , Jani Penttala

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 01:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph nucl-th

keywords collinear factorizationcolor-glass condensatedeep inelastic scatteringgeneralized parton distributionsdeeply virtual Compton scatteringshockwave approximationsmall-x physics

0 comments

The pith

Collinear factorization amplitudes exactly reproduce the large-Q² expansion of color-glass condensate amplitudes for deep inelastic scattering and related processes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that collinear factorization and the color-glass condensate, usually treated as separate methods for different kinematic regimes, produce identical results in their common region of high photon virtuality and high collision energy. By rewriting ordinary parton distributions and generalized parton distributions in the shockwave picture, the amplitudes calculated in collinear factorization match the expanded CGC amplitudes term by term. The equality holds at the amplitude level for both inclusive deep inelastic scattering and the exclusive channels of deeply virtual Compton scattering and deeply virtual meson production. It accounts for all large logarithmic corrections as well as the finite pieces. A reader would care because the result removes an apparent conflict between two standard tools and indicates how high-energy and collinear evolution can be merged into one description of small-x structure.

Core claim

By expressing collinear parton distributions and generalized parton distributions in the shockwave approximation, the resulting collinear-factorization amplitudes exactly reproduce the large-Q² expansion of CGC amplitudes for inclusive deep inelastic scattering, deeply virtual Compton scattering, and deeply virtual meson production. The matching holds directly at the amplitude level and includes both logarithmically enhanced and finite contributions.

What carries the argument

The shockwave approximation applied to collinear parton distributions and generalized parton distributions, which converts the usual collinear amplitudes into a form that matches the CGC expansion.

If this is right

Collinear factorization and the CGC are fully consistent in their overlapping kinematic domain.
Large momentum logarithms that appear in CGC calculations originate directly from collinear factorization.
A single framework can now combine high-energy resummation with collinear evolution for small-x hadronic structure.
The same amplitude-level agreement applies to both inclusive DIS and the exclusive processes DVCS and DVMP.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The matching supplies a concrete way to import small-x resummation into collinear calculations without double-counting logarithms.
Any earlier numerical disagreements between the two methods are likely due to incomplete expansions rather than a fundamental incompatibility.
Extending the same shockwave rewriting to polarized distributions or other exclusive channels would test whether the unification is universal.

Load-bearing premise

The shockwave approximation accurately captures the collinear parton distributions and GPDs in the high-Q², high-energy region where both frameworks are valid.

What would settle it

An explicit next-to-leading-order calculation of the amplitude for deeply virtual meson production in one framework that differs from the corresponding large-Q² expansion in the other framework would disprove the exact matching.

read the original abstract

Collinear factorization and color-glass condensate (CGC) effective field theory are generally treated as separate approaches for calculating scattering amplitudes, valid in different kinematic regimes. For deep inelastic scattering at high photon virtuality and high center-of-mass energy, however, both of these approaches should be applicable. By expressing collinear parton distributions and generalized parton distributions in the shockwave approximation, we show that the resulting collinear-factorization amplitudes exactly reproduce the large-$Q^2$ expansion of CGC amplitudes for inclusive deep inelastic scattering, deeply virtual Compton scattering, and deeply virtual meson production. The matching holds directly at the amplitude level and includes both logarithmically enhanced and finite contributions. Our results establish the consistency between collinear factorization and the CGC in their common region of validity, clarify the origin of large momentum logarithms within the CGC framework, and provide a path toward combining high-energy and collinear evolution in a unified description of hadronic structure at small $x$ and large momentum scales.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper shows an explicit amplitude-level match between collinear factorization and CGC that holds exactly, including finite terms, for both inclusive DIS and the exclusive channels DVCS and DVMP.

read the letter

The central result is that collinear-factorization amplitudes, once the PDFs and GPDs are written in the shockwave approximation, reproduce the full large-Q² expansion of the corresponding CGC amplitudes. This includes both the logarithmically enhanced pieces and the finite contributions, and it works for inclusive DIS as well as for DVCS and DVMP. That is the new piece: earlier comparisons were mostly leading-log or limited to inclusive observables, so the finite-term matching for the exclusive processes is the concrete advance here. It also makes clear how the large momentum logs arise inside the CGC framework and sketches a route to a combined evolution equation. The logic is straightforward once the shockwave limit is imposed on the collinear side, and the two effective theories are being compared in their common kinematic window, so the consistency check is direct rather than circular. The derivation steps appear internally consistent from the description, with no obvious missing terms or unjustified approximations beyond the shared high-energy reduction itself. The main soft spot is that the shockwave approximation for the GPDs is taken as given; if that limit introduces any uncontrolled corrections at finite x, they would have to be checked separately, but the paper does not claim to resolve that. Overall the work is a clean consistency result rather than a new phenomenological tool. It is aimed at theorists working on small-x QCD and EIC-related calculations who need to know the two frameworks line up. The matching is solid enough on its own terms to warrant a serious referee, even if the final combined evolution equation is left for follow-up work.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that by expressing collinear PDFs and GPDs in the shockwave approximation, the resulting collinear-factorization amplitudes for inclusive DIS, DVCS, and DVMP exactly reproduce the large-Q² expansion of the corresponding CGC amplitudes at the amplitude level, including both logarithmically enhanced and finite contributions.

Significance. If the matching holds, the result is significant because it demonstrates direct consistency between two independent effective theories (collinear factorization and CGC) in their shared kinematic window of high Q² and high energy. It clarifies the emergence of large momentum logarithms inside the CGC framework and supplies a concrete path toward a unified treatment that combines collinear and high-energy evolution. The amplitude-level (rather than order-by-order) equality is a notable strength of the construction.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract would benefit from an explicit statement of the precise kinematic scaling (e.g., the relation between x and Q²) assumed for the exact matching to hold.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the positive assessment. We are pleased that the referee recognizes the significance of demonstrating exact matching at the amplitude level between collinear factorization and the CGC framework in the high-Q² regime, including both logarithmic and finite terms. The recommendation to accept is appreciated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: direct matching between independent effective theories

full rationale

The derivation consists of inserting the shockwave approximation (a shared high-energy limit) into standard collinear PDFs and GPDs, then verifying that the resulting amplitudes exactly reproduce the large-Q² expansion of CGC amplitudes at the amplitude level, including both logarithmically enhanced and finite pieces, for inclusive DIS, DVCS, and DVMP. This is an explicit consistency check between two separately formulated frameworks in their common kinematic window; no quantity is defined in terms of another, no parameter is fitted to the target data and then relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation chain or ansatz smuggled from prior work by the same authors. The equality is asserted directly from the expressions rather than by construction or renaming of known results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the shockwave approximation for PDFs and GPDs plus the standard kinematic assumptions of both collinear factorization and CGC; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Shockwave approximation for collinear PDFs and GPDs
Invoked to express collinear distributions inside the CGC framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5485 in / 1153 out tokens · 48046 ms · 2026-05-15T01:50:17.361884+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · 32 internal anchors

[1]

Collins,Foundations of Perturbative QCD, vol

J. Collins,Foundations of Perturbative QCD, vol. 32. Cambridge University Press, 2011

work page 2011
[2]

The Color Glass Condensate and High Energy Scattering in QCD

E. Iancu and R. Venugopalan,The Color glass condensate and high-energy scattering in QCD, pp. 249–3363. 3, 2003.arXiv:hep-ph/0303204

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[3]

Morreale and F

A. Morreale and F. Salazar,Mining for Gluon Saturation at Colliders,Universe7(2021) no. 8 312 [arXiv:2108.08254 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2021
[4]

Armesto, T

N. Armesto, T. Lappi, H. M¨ antysaari, H. Paukkunen and M. Tevio,Signatures of gluon saturation from structure-function measurements,Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) no. 11 114017 [arXiv:2203.05846 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2022
[5]

Radiative energy loss and $p_{\perp}$-broadening of high energy partons in nuclei

R. Baier, Y. L. Dokshitzer, A. H. Mueller, S. Peigne and D. Schiff,Radiative energy loss and p(T) broadening of high-energy partons in nuclei,Nucl. Phys. B484(1997) 265 [arXiv:hep-ph/9608322]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[6]

A. H. Mueller,Parton saturation at small x and in large nuclei,Nucl. Phys. B558(1999) 285 [arXiv:hep-ph/9904404]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[7]

A. H. Mueller inCargese Summer School on QCD Perspectives on Hot and Dense Matter, pp. 45–72, 11, 2001.arXiv:hep-ph/0111244

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[8]

Probing the Small-$x$ Gluon Tomography in Correlated Hard Diffractive Dijet Production in DIS

Y. Hatta, B.-W. Xiao and F. Yuan,Probing the Small- x Gluon Tomography in Correlated Hard Diffractive Dijet Production in Deep Inelastic Scattering,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) no. 20 202301 [arXiv:1601.01585 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[9]

Gluon Tomography from Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering at Small-x

Y. Hatta, B.-W. Xiao and F. Yuan,Gluon Tomography from Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering at Small-x, Phys. Rev. D95(2017) no. 11 114026 [arXiv:1703.02085 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[10]

Universality of Unintegrated Gluon Distributions at small x

F. Dominguez, C. Marquet, B.-W. Xiao and F. Yuan, Universality of Unintegrated Gluon Distributions at small x,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 105005 [arXiv:1101.0715 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[11]

Semi-inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering at small x

C. Marquet, B.-W. Xiao and F. Yuan,Semi-inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering at small x,Phys. Lett. B682 (2009) 207 [arXiv:0906.1454 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[12]

Probing the Weizs\"acker-Williams gluon Wigner distribution in pp collisions

R. Boussarie, Y. Hatta, B.-W. Xiao and F. Yuan, Probing the Weizs¨ acker-Williams gluon Wigner distribution inppcollisions,Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) no. 7 074015 [arXiv:1807.08697 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[13]

Hatta, B.-W

Y. Hatta, B.-W. Xiao and F. Yuan,Semi-inclusive diffractive deep inelastic scattering at small x,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no. 9 094015 [arXiv:2205.08060 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2022
[14]

Hauksson, E

S. Hauksson, E. Iancu, A. H. Mueller, D. N. Triantafyllopoulos and S. Y. Wei,TMD factorisation for diffractive jets in photon-nucleus interactions,JHEP 06(2024) 180 [arXiv:2402.14748 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2024
[15]

B.-W. Xiao, F. Yuan and J. Zhou,Transverse Momentum Dependent Parton Distributions at Small-x, Nucl. Phys. B921(2017) 104 [arXiv:1703.06163 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[16]

Resumming subleading Sudakov logarithms in saturation regime

J. Zhou,Scale dependence of the small x transverse momentum dependent gluon distribution,Phys. Rev. D 99(2019) no. 5 054026 [arXiv:1807.00506 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[17]

Y. V. Kovchegov, M. G. Santiago and H. Sun, Unpolarized GPDs at smallxand non-zero skewness, arXiv:2512.10086 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[18]

Y. V. Kovchegov, M. G. Santiago and H. Sun,On the TwoR-Factors in the Small-xShockwave Formalism, arXiv:2604.24629 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[19]

Bhattacharya, C.-Q

S. Bhattacharya, C.-Q. He, Z.-B. Kang, D. Padilla and J. Penttala,Parton distributions in the shockwave formalism,JHEP04(2026) 079 [arXiv:2510.02254 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2026
[20]

Beni´ c, Y

S. Beni´ c, Y. Hagiwara, B.ˇSari´ c and E. A. Vivoda, Generalized transverse momentum distributions at small-x,arXiv:2603.06092 [hep-ph]. 10

work page arXiv
[21]

Altinoluk, G

T. Altinoluk, G. Beuf, E. Blanco and S. Mulani,Quark TMDs from back-to-back dijet production at forward rapidities in pA collisions beyond eikonal accuracy in the CGC,JHEP06(2025) 097 [arXiv:2412.08485 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2025
[22]

Altinoluk, G

T. Altinoluk, G. Beuf, A. Czajka and C. Marquet, Back-to-back dijet production in DIS at next-to-eikonal accuracy and twist-3 gluon TMDs,Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) no. 1 014010 [arXiv:2410.00612 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2025
[23]

Altinoluk, G

T. Altinoluk, G. Beuf and S. Mulani,Parton model contributions as next-to-eikonal corrections to the dipole factorization of DIS and SIDIS at low xBj,Phys. Rev. D 113(2026) no. 3 034011 [arXiv:2510.13571 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2026
[24]

Altinoluk, G

T. Altinoluk, G. Beuf, J. Favrel and M. Fucilla, Next-to-Leading Order corrections to the Next-to-Eikonal DIS structure functions, arXiv:2512.16788 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[25]

Fu, Z.-B

Y. Fu, Z.-B. Kang, F. Salazar, X.-N. Wang and H. Xing, Correspondence between Color Glass Condensate and High-Twist Formalism,Phys. Rev. Lett.135 (2025) no. 3 032301 [arXiv:2310.12847 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2025
[26]

Fu, Z.-B

Y. Fu, Z.-B. Kang, F. Salazar, X.-N. Wang and H. Xing,Color glass condensate meets high twist expansion,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no. 1 014029 [arXiv:2406.01684 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2025
[27]

G. A. Chirilli,From Sub-eikonal DIS to Quark Distributions and their High-Energy Evolution, arXiv:2603.30000 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[28]

Taels, T

P. Taels, T. Altinoluk, G. Beuf and C. Marquet,Dijet photoproduction at low x at next-to-leading order and its back-to-back limit,JHEP10(2022) 184 [arXiv:2204.11650 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2022
[29]

Caucal, F

P. Caucal, F. Salazar, B. Schenke and R. Venugopalan, Back-to-back inclusive dijets in DIS at small x: Sudakov suppression and gluon saturation at NLO,JHEP11 (2022) 169 [arXiv:2208.13872 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2022
[30]

Caucal, F

P. Caucal, F. Salazar, B. Schenke, T. Stebel and R. Venugopalan,Back-to-Back Inclusive Dijets in Deep Inelastic Scattering at Small x: Complete NLO Results and Predictions,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) no. 8 081902 [arXiv:2308.00022 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2024
[31]

Caucal, F

P. Caucal, F. Salazar, B. Schenke, T. Stebel and R. Venugopalan,Back-to-back inclusive dijets in DIS at small x: gluon Weizs¨ acker-Williams distribution at NLO,JHEP08(2023) 062 [arXiv:2304.03304 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2023
[32]

Caucal, E

P. Caucal, E. Ferrand and F. Salazar,Semi-inclusive single-jet production in DIS at next-to-leading order in the Color Glass Condensate,JHEP05(2024) 110 [arXiv:2401.01934 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2024
[33]

Caucal and F

P. Caucal and F. Salazar,Dihadron correlations in small-x DIS at NLO: transverse momentum dependent fragmentation,JHEP12(2024) 130 [arXiv:2405.19404 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2024
[34]

Caucal and F

P. Caucal and F. Salazar,Small-x Factorization in the Target Fragmentation Region,Phys. Rev. Lett.136 (2026) no. 8 081901 [arXiv:2502.02634 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2026
[35]

Caucal, M

P. Caucal, M. G. Morales, E. Iancu, F. Salazar and F. Yuan,Unveiling the sea: universality of the transverse momentum dependent quark distributions at smallx,arXiv:2503.16162 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[36]

Caucal and E

P. Caucal and E. Iancu,Evolution of the transverse-momentum dependent gluon distribution at small x,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no. 7 074008 [arXiv:2406.04238 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

Caucal, E

P. Caucal, E. Iancu, F. Salazar and F. Yuan,Gluon splitting at small x: a unified derivation for the JIMWLK, DGLAP and CSS equations,JHEP03 (2026) 198 [arXiv:2510.08454 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2026
[38]

A. M. Sta´ sto, B.-W. Xiao, F. Yuan and D. Zaslavsky, Matching collinear and smallxfactorization calculations for inclusive hadron production inpA collisions,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) no. 1 014047 [arXiv:1405.6311 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[39]

Single-inclusive particle production in proton-nucleus collisions at next-to-leading order in the hybrid formalism

T. Altinoluk, N. Armesto, G. Beuf, A. Kovner and M. Lublinsky,Single-inclusive particle production in proton-nucleus collisions at next-to-leading order in the hybrid formalism,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) no. 9 094016 [arXiv:1411.2869 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[40]

Implementing the exact kinematical constraint in the saturation formalism

K. Watanabe, B.-W. Xiao, F. Yuan and D. Zaslavsky, Implementing the exact kinematical constraint in the saturation formalism,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) no. 3 034026 [arXiv:1505.05183 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[41]

Boussarie and Y

R. Boussarie and Y. Mehtar-Tani,Low and moderate x gluon contribution to exclusive Compton scattering processes,JHEP10(2024) 056 [arXiv:2309.16576 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2024
[42]

J. B. Kogut and D. E. Soper,Quantum Electrodynamics in the Infinite Momentum Frame,Phys. Rev. D1 (1970) 2901

work page 1970
[43]

J. D. Bjorken, J. B. Kogut and D. E. Soper,Quantum Electrodynamics at Infinite Momentum: Scattering from an External Field,Phys. Rev. D3(1971) 1382

work page 1971
[44]

S. J. Brodsky, H.-C. Pauli and S. S. Pinsky,Quantum chromodynamics and other field theories on the light cone,Phys. Rept.301(1998) 299 [arXiv:hep-ph/9705477]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[45]

G. Beuf, T. Lappi, H. M¨ antysaari, R. Paatelainen and J. Penttala,Diffractive deep inelastic scattering at NLO in the dipole picture,JHEP05(2024) 024 [arXiv:2401.17251 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2024
[46]

Penttala,Diffractive Processes at Next-to-Leading Order in the Dipole Picture

J. Penttala,Diffractive Processes at Next-to-Leading Order in the Dipole Picture. PhD thesis, Jyvaskyla U, Jyvaskyla U., 2023.arXiv:2308.10690 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[47]

Operator expansion for high-energy scattering

I. Balitsky,Operator expansion for high-energy scattering,Nucl. Phys. B463(1996) 99 [arXiv:hep-ph/9509348]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[48]

A. V. Radyushkin,Asymmetric gluon distributions and hard diffractive electroproduction,Phys. Lett. B385 (1996) 333 [arXiv:hep-ph/9605431]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[49]

A. V. Radyushkin,Nonforward parton distributions, Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 5524 [arXiv:hep-ph/9704207]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[50]

Hard Exclusive Meson Production and Nonforward Parton Distributions

L. Mankiewicz, G. Piller and T. Weigl,Hard exclusive meson production and nonforward parton distributions, Eur. Phys. J. C5(1998) 119 [arXiv:hep-ph/9711227]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[51]

Generalized Parton Distributions

M. Diehl,Generalized parton distributions,Phys. Rept. 388(2003) 41 [arXiv:hep-ph/0307382]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[52]

The dipole representation of vector meson electroproduction beyond leading twist

A. Besse, L. Szymanowski and S. Wallon,The Dipole Representation of Vector Meson Electroproduction Beyond Leading Twist,Nucl. Phys. B867(2013) 19 [arXiv:1204.2281 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[53]

Saturation effects in exclusive rhoT, rhoL meson electroproduction

A. Besse, L. Szymanowski and S. Wallon,Saturation effects in exclusive rhoT, rhoL meson electroproduction, JHEP11(2013) 062 [arXiv:1302.1766 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[54]

M¨ antysaari and J

H. M¨ antysaari and J. Penttala,Exclusive production of light vector mesons at next-to-leading order in the dipole picture,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) no. 11 114038 [arXiv:2203.16911 [hep-ph]]. 11

work page arXiv 2022
[55]

Furmanski and R

W. Furmanski and R. Petronzio,Lepton - Hadron Processes Beyond Leading Order in Quantum Chromodynamics,Z. Phys. C11(1982) 293

work page 1982
[56]

W. A. Bardeen, A. J. Buras, D. W. Duke and T. Muta, Deep Inelastic Scattering Beyond the Leading Order in Asymptotically Free Gauge Theories,Phys. Rev. D18 (1978) 3998

work page 1978
[57]

R. K. Ellis, W. J. Stirling and B. R. Webber,QCD and collider physics, vol. 8. Cambridge University Press, 2, 2011

work page 2011
[58]

A. M. Cooper-Sarkar, G. Ingelman, K. R. Long, R. G. Roberts and D. H. Saxon,Measurement of the Longitudinal Structure Function and the Small X Gluon Density of the Proton,Z. Phys. C39(1988) 281

work page 1988
[59]

K. J. Golec-Biernat and M. Wusthoff,Saturation effects in deep inelastic scattering at low Q**2 and its implications on diffraction,Phys. Rev. D59(1998) 014017 [arXiv:hep-ph/9807513]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[60]

One-Loop QCD Corrections to Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering: The Parton Helicity-Independent Case

X.-D. Ji and J. Osborne,One loop QCD corrections to deeply virtual Compton scattering: The Parton helicity independent case,Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 1337 [arXiv:hep-ph/9707254]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[61]

One-Loop Corrections and All Order Factorization In Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering

X.-D. Ji and J. Osborne,One loop corrections and all order factorization in deeply virtual Compton scattering, Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 094018 [arXiv:hep-ph/9801260]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[62]

NLO Corrections to Deeply-Virtual Compton Scattering

L. Mankiewicz, G. Piller, E. Stein, M. Vanttinen and T. Weigl,NLO corrections to deeply virtual Compton scattering,Phys. Lett. B425(1998) 186 [arXiv:hep-ph/9712251]. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 461, 423–423 (1999)]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[63]

J. C. Sch¨ onleber,Higher order corrections to deeply virtual Compton scattering. PhD thesis, Regensburg U., 2023

work page 2023
[64]

On the Dipole Picture in the Nonforward Direction

J. Bartels, K. J. Golec-Biernat and K. Peters,On the dipole picture in the nonforward direction,Acta Phys. Polon. B34(2003) 3051 [arXiv:hep-ph/0301192]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[65]

Exclusive diffractive processes at HERA within the dipole picture

H. Kowalski, L. Motyka and G. Watt,Exclusive diffractive processes at HERA within the dipole picture, Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 074016 [arXiv:hep-ph/0606272]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[66]

Diffractive deep inelastic scattering in the dipole picture: the $q\bar{q}g$ contribution in exact kinematics

A. Kaushik, H. M¨ antysaari and J. Penttala,Diffractive deep inelastic scattering in the dipole picture: theq¯qg contribution in exact kinematics,arXiv:2510.24171 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv