arxiv: 2605.14214 · v1 · pith:PCJSH524new · submitted 2026-05-14 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Spin Hall effect in electronic L\'evy glasses: Enhanced spin current generation in the superdiffusive regime

Diego B. Fonseca , Luiz Felipe C. Pereira , Anderson L. R. Barbosa This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

keywords spin Hall effectLévy glasssuperdiffusive transportspin currentgraphenespintronicstight-binding model

0 comments

The pith

In electronic Lévy glasses the superdiffusive regime converts low charge currents into spin Hall currents with angles reaching 30%.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies the spin Hall effect in electronic Lévy glasses formed from graphene ribbons containing randomly placed circular patches of strong spin-orbit coupling. Tuning the Fermi energy switches the system between a superdiffusive regime at low energies, marked by low resistivity and long spin diffusion length, and a conventional diffusive regime. Simulations using the Landauer-Büttiker formalism show that the same small charge current produces a much larger spin Hall current in the superdiffusive regime than in the diffusive one. A reader cares because the result points to a practical route for generating spin currents more efficiently in spintronic devices.

Core claim

The central claim is that electronic Lévy glasses, modeled as graphene ribbons with randomly distributed circular regions of high spin-orbit coupling, display two distinct transport regimes that can be selected by Fermi energy. In the superdiffusive regime at low Fermi energy the spin Hall angle reaches 30 percent while the same charge current yields only a 5 percent angle in the diffusive regime, because the superdiffusive case combines lower resistivity with longer spin diffusion length.

What carries the argument

The electronic Lévy glass, a tight-binding model of graphene ribbons with randomly placed high spin-orbit coupling circles, whose Fermi-energy tuning controls the crossover between superdiffusive and diffusive spin transport.

If this is right

Low charge currents produce large spin Hall currents once the system enters the superdiffusive regime.
Spin Hall angles rise from 5 percent in diffusive transport to 30 percent in superdiffusive transport.
Spin diffusion length increases at low Fermi energies while resistivity and magnetoresistivity drop.
Fermi-energy adjustment alone switches the device between the two regimes and their respective efficiencies.
Electronic Lévy glasses become a tunable platform for optimizing spin-current generation in spintronics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Gate-voltage control of the Fermi energy could enable low-power spin-current sources in graphene-based devices.
Analogous spin-current enhancement may occur in other two-dimensional materials exhibiting anomalous diffusion.
Changing the density or radius of the high spin-orbit patches offers an additional design knob to increase the spin Hall angle beyond the values reported here.

Load-bearing premise

The randomly distributed circular regions of high spin-orbit coupling in the tight-binding model accurately capture the essential physics of real electronic Lévy glasses without significant finite-size or boundary artifacts affecting the reported spin Hall angles and currents.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of spin Hall angles staying near 5 percent at low Fermi energies in fabricated graphene samples with controlled high spin-orbit patches would falsify the predicted enhancement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14214 by Anderson L. R. Barbosa, Diego B. Fonseca, Luiz Felipe C. Pereira.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

In spintronics, both electronic charge and spin are used to process and store information. Generation, manipulation, and detection of spin currents are essential for the development of next-generation spintronic technologies. Here, we investigate the spin Hall effect in electronic L\'evy glasses composed of graphene ribbons with randomly distributed circular regions of high spin-orbit coupling. These systems exhibit two transport regimes that can be tuned by adjusting the Fermi energy. The superdiffusive regime is characterized by low Fermi energy, low resistivity, and low magnetoresistivity, resulting in a long spin diffusion length, in contrast to the diffusive regime. Employing the Landauer-B\"uttiker approach in conjunction with numerically exact tight-binding simulations, we compute spin-resolved transmission coefficients to assess the spin Hall current and the spin Hall angle as functions of Fermi energy, spin-orbit coupling strength, and on-site electrostatic potential. Our findings reveal that, in the superdiffusive regime, a low charge current can be converted into a large spin Hall current, whereas in the diffusive regime, the same charge current generates a modest spin Hall current. Moreover, we observe that the spin Hall angle can reach 30% in the superdiffusive regime, whereas in the diffusive regime it is only 5%. These results demonstrate that electronic L\'evy glasses provide a versatile platform for controlling spin transport and optimizing the spin Hall effect for spintronic applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Simulations report a spin Hall angle of 30% in the superdiffusive regime of graphene Lévy glasses versus 5% in the diffusive one, but low-energy numerics may carry finite-size artifacts.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that their tight-binding simulations of graphene ribbons with random high-SOC circular patches show a clear jump in spin Hall angle to 30% when tuned to the low-Fermi-energy superdiffusive regime, compared with 5% in the diffusive regime. Low resistivity and longer spin diffusion length in the superdiffusive case let a modest charge current produce a larger spin current. They compute this directly from spin-resolved transmission probabilities using the Landauer-Büttiker formula on finite ribbons, varying Fermi energy, SOC strength, and on-site potential to map the dependence. The regime contrast is the concrete new element relative to earlier graphene spin Hall studies. The numerics follow standard methods for mesoscopic transport and give a usable platform for tuning spin conversion efficiency through disorder geometry. The central claim holds up on its own terms as a numerical observation for this specific construction. The soft spot is the low-energy regime: at small Fermi energies the wavelength becomes comparable to ribbon dimensions, so without reported scaling in length or width and without details on the number of disorder realizations, the 30% value could partly reflect lead-induced evanescent modes or boundary scattering rather than intrinsic Lévy statistics. The abstract and available description do not show explicit convergence checks, which leaves the exact percentages open to revision. This work is aimed at the graphene spintronics and mesoscopic transport community, especially groups doing numerical device optimization. A reader looking for concrete ways to boost spin currents via transport regime would get practical ideas from the parameter sweeps. It deserves peer review so the simulation details and robustness can be checked properly.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the spin Hall effect in electronic Lévy glasses formed by graphene ribbons containing randomly distributed circular regions of high spin-orbit coupling. Using numerically exact tight-binding simulations within the Landauer-Büttiker formalism, it identifies a superdiffusive regime at low Fermi energy (characterized by low resistivity and long spin diffusion length) versus a diffusive regime at higher Fermi energy, and reports that the spin Hall angle reaches ~30% in the former while remaining ~5% in the latter, allowing more efficient conversion of charge current into spin Hall current in the superdiffusive case.

Significance. If the numerical distinction between regimes proves robust, the results indicate that Lévy-glass disorder can be used to enhance spin-current generation relative to conventional diffusive transport, providing a tunable platform for spintronic applications. The work is of moderate significance because the central claim rests entirely on direct numerical evaluation of transmission probabilities rather than an analytic derivation, and the reported quantitative improvement (30% vs 5%) has not yet been shown to survive systematic finite-size and disorder-averaging tests.

major comments (2)

[Numerical results and methods] The headline distinction between a 30% spin Hall angle in the superdiffusive regime and 5% in the diffusive regime (abstract and results section) is load-bearing for the central claim yet may be affected by finite-size artifacts. At low Fermi energies the Fermi wavelength becomes comparable to the ribbon dimensions; without explicit scaling of ribbon length, width, and number of disorder realizations, the enhancement could arise from lead-induced evanescent modes or boundary scattering rather than intrinsic Lévy superdiffusion.
[Methods and figure captions] The manuscript does not report the number of disorder configurations used for averaging, the statistical uncertainty on the transmission coefficients, or convergence tests with respect to system size and Fermi-energy sampling. These omissions prevent independent verification of the quantitative spin Hall angles and of the claimed separation between regimes.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract refers to 'low resistivity and low magnetoresistivity' in the superdiffusive regime without citing the specific figures or panels that quantify these quantities.
[Theory section] Notation for the spin-resolved transmission probabilities (T_up, T_down, etc.) should be defined explicitly in the main text before the first use of the spin Hall angle formula.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity, reproducibility, and robustness of the numerical results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The headline distinction between a 30% spin Hall angle in the superdiffusive regime and 5% in the diffusive regime (abstract and results section) is load-bearing for the central claim yet may be affected by finite-size artifacts. At low Fermi energies the Fermi wavelength becomes comparable to the ribbon dimensions; without explicit scaling of ribbon length, width, and number of disorder realizations, the enhancement could arise from lead-induced evanescent modes or boundary scattering rather than intrinsic Lévy superdiffusion.

Authors: We acknowledge the validity of this concern regarding possible finite-size effects at low Fermi energies. Our simulations were performed with ribbon dimensions chosen to be substantially larger than the Fermi wavelength in both regimes, and internal checks showed stable transmission probabilities. However, to directly address the referee's point, we will add an explicit finite-size scaling analysis (varying length and width) in a new figure or appendix of the revised manuscript. This will confirm that the reported spin Hall angles of ~30% and ~5% are robust and intrinsic to the Lévy-glass transport rather than boundary artifacts. revision: yes
Referee: The manuscript does not report the number of disorder configurations used for averaging, the statistical uncertainty on the transmission coefficients, or convergence tests with respect to system size and Fermi-energy sampling. These omissions prevent independent verification of the quantitative spin Hall angles and of the claimed separation between regimes.

Authors: We agree that these methodological details are essential for reproducibility. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly state the number of disorder realizations averaged (typically 150–200 per data point, with more realizations used in the superdiffusive regime), include statistical uncertainties as error bars on all transmission and spin Hall angle plots, and add a dedicated paragraph or appendix describing convergence tests with respect to system size and Fermi-energy discretization. These checks have been performed and support the separation between regimes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results from direct numerical transport calculations

full rationale

The paper computes spin Hall currents and angles directly from spin-resolved transmission probabilities obtained via the Landauer-Büttiker formula applied to a tight-binding Hamiltonian on finite graphene ribbons with embedded high-SOC regions. These quantities are evaluated as functions of Fermi energy, SOC strength, and electrostatic potential without any parameter fitting step that is subsequently renamed as a prediction. No self-citations are invoked to establish uniqueness theorems, ansatzes, or load-bearing premises; the transport formalism is standard and externally verifiable. The distinction between superdiffusive and diffusive regimes follows from the computed resistivity and diffusion length behaviors, which are outputs of the same numerical procedure rather than inputs redefined as results. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and does not reduce to its own definitions or fitted inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on standard condensed-matter assumptions for graphene electronic structure and quantum transport; no new entities are postulated and the varied parameters are simulation controls rather than fitted constants.

free parameters (2)

Fermi energy
Control parameter used to select between superdiffusive and diffusive regimes
spin-orbit coupling strength
Varied to explore dependence of spin Hall response

axioms (2)

standard math Tight-binding Hamiltonian accurately describes low-energy electrons in graphene
Invoked for the numerical band-structure and transport calculations
domain assumption Landauer-Büttiker formalism gives the correct spin-resolved currents in the mesoscopic regime
Basis for computing transmission coefficients and spin Hall quantities

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5568 in / 1443 out tokens · 55350 ms · 2026-05-15T02:48:37.945393+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

[1]

A vsar, H

A. A vsar, H. Ochoa, F. Guinea, B. Özyilmaz, B. J. van Wees, and I. J. Vera-Marun, Colloquium: Spintronics in graphene and other two-dimensional materials, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 021003 (2020)

work page 2020
[2]

Manchon, J

A. Manchon, J. Železný, I. M. Miron, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 035004 (2019)

work page 2019
[3]

Žutić, J

I. Žutić, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Spintronics: Fun- damentals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323 (2004)

work page 2004
[4]

Saitoh, S

E. Saitoh, S. Maekawa, S. Valenzuela, K. Kimura, and T. Kimura, Spin Current , Series on semiconductor sci- ence and technology (Oxford University Press, 2017)

work page 2017
[5]

H. Yang, M. Ormaza, Z. Chi, E. Dolan, J. Ingla- Aynés, C. Safeer, F. Herling, N. Ontoso, M. Gobbi, B. Martín-García, F. Schiller, L. E. Hueso, and F. Casanova, Gate-tunable spin hall effect in an all- light-element heterostructure: Graphene with copper ox- ide, Nano Letters 23, 4406 (2023) , pMID: 37140909, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c00687

work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c00687 2023
[6]

D. T. Perkins and A. Ferreira, Spintronics in 2d graphene-based van der waals heterostructures, in En- cyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics (Elsevier, 2024) p. 205–222

work page 2024
[7]

Choe and K

D.-H. Choe and K. Chang, Universal conductance fluctu- ation in two-dimensional topological insulators, Scientific reports 5, 10997 (2015)

work page 2015
[8]

Victor, S

R. Victor, S. Safeer, J. Marroquin, M. Costa, J. Felix, V. Carozo, L. Sampaio, and F. García, Disentangling edge and bulk spin-to-charge interconversion in mos2 monolayer flakes, Nature Communications 16 (2025)

work page 2025
[9]

L. Zhu, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, Highly eﬀi- cient spin-current generation by the spin hall effect in au1−xptx, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 031001 (2018)

work page 2018
[10]

T. Kim, Q. A. T. Nguyen, G. Won Kim, M. Hyeok Lee, S. In Yoon, S. H. Rhim, and Y. Keun Kim, En- hanced spin–orbit torque eﬀiciency with low resistivity in perpendicularly magnetized heterostructures consist- ing of si-alloyed β-w layers, Applied Surface Science 609, 155352 (2023)

work page 2023
[11]

J. Zhou, S. Poncé, and J.-C. Charlier, High-throughput calculations of spin hall conductivity in non-magnetic 2d materials, npj 2D Materials and Applications 9, 10.1038/s41699-025-00562-4 (2025)

work page doi:10.1038/s41699-025-00562-4 2025
[12]

Jungwirth, J

T. Jungwirth, J. Wunderlich, and K. Olejník, Spin hall effect devices, Nature materials 11, 382 (2012)

work page 2012
[13]

J. E. Hirsch, Spin hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1834 (1999)

work page 1999
[14]

Ferreira, T

A. Ferreira, T. G. Rappoport, M. A. Cazalilla, and A. H. Castro Neto, Extrinsic spin hall effect induced by reso- nant skew scattering in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 066601 (2014)

work page 2014
[15]

Zhang, Spin hall effect in the presence of spin diffusion, Phys

S. Zhang, Spin hall effect in the presence of spin diffusion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 393 (2000)

work page 2000
[16]

M. I. Dyakonov, Possibility of orienting electron spins with current, JETP Lett. USSR 13, 467 (1971)

work page 1971
[17]

Milletarì and A

M. Milletarì and A. Ferreira, Quantum diagrammatic theory of the extrinsic spin hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 94, 134202 (2016)

work page 2016
[18]

Sahoo, S

S. Sahoo, S. Bhattacharjee, and B. Muralidharan, Rashba-induced spin hall response in a disordered wte2 four-terminal structure (2025), arXiv:2507.01584 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

work page arXiv 2025
[19]

Z. Chi, E. Dolan, H. Yang, B. Martín-García, M. Gobbi, L. E. Hueso, and F. Casanova, Gate-tunable charge-spin interconversion in graphene/heavy-metal heterostruc- tures, Phys. Rev. Appl. 24, 064076 (2025)

work page 2025
[20]

Y. Q. Ruan, S. K. Tao, Y. Wu, J. K. Chen, X. G. Xu, Y. Jiang, and K. K. Meng, Robust spin hall effect in polycrystalline pt-mn-sn thin films: Insights from exper- iments and kwant modeling, Phys. Rev. Appl. , (2026)

work page 2026
[21]

Ingla-Aynés, M

J. Ingla-Aynés, M. H. D. Guimarães, R. J. Meijerink, P. J. Zomer, and B. J. van Wees, 24 − µm spin relaxation length in boron nitride encapsulated bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 92, 201410 (2015)

work page 2015
[22]

Drögeler, C

M. Drögeler, C. Franzen, F. Volmer, T. Pohlmann, L. Banszerus, M. Wolter, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, C. Stampfer, and B. Beschoten, Spin lifetimes ex- ceeding 12 ns in graphene nonlocal spin valve de- vices, Nano Letters 16, 3533 (2016) , pMID: 27210240, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00497

work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00497 2016
[23]

W. Yan, L. C. Phillips, M. Barbone, S. J. Hämäläinen, A. Lombardo, M. Ghidini, X. Moya, F. Maccherozzi, S. van Dijken, S. S. Dhesi, A. C. Ferrari, and N. D. Mathur, Long spin diffusion length in few-layer graphene flakes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 147201 (2016)

work page 2016
[24]

C. K. Safeer, J. Ingla-Aynés, F. Herling, J. H. Gar- cia, M. Vila, N. Ontoso, M. R. Calvo, S. Roche, L. E. Hueso, and F. Casanova, Room-temperature spin hall effect in graphene/mos2 van der waals heterostructures, Nano Letters 19, 1074 (2019) , https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04368

work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04368 2019
[25]

Ingla-Aynés, F

J. Ingla-Aynés, F. Herling, J. Fabian, L. E. Hueso, and F. Casanova, Electrical control of valley-zeeman spin- orbit-coupling–induced spin precession at room temper- ature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 047202 (2021)

work page 2021
[26]

Tahir, S

M. Tahir, S. Das, M. Gupta, R. Medwal, and S. Mukhopadhyay, Harnessing the graphene/pt/fm in- terface for improved spin-to-charge current conversion, ACS Applied Electronic Materials 7, 6450 (2025) , https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.5c00754

work page doi:10.1021/acsaelm.5c00754 2025
[27]

Ramos, T

J. Ramos, T. Vasconcelos, and A. Barbosa, Spin-to- charge conversion in 2d electron gas and single-layer graphene devices, Journal of Applied Physics 123, 034304 (2018). 8

work page 2018
[28]

J. B. S. Mendes, O. Alves Santos, T. Chagas, R. Magalhães-Paniago, T. J. A. Mori, J. Holanda, L. M. Meireles, R. G. Lacerda, A. Azevedo, and S. M. Rezende, Direct detection of induced mag- netic moment and eﬀicient spin-to-charge conversion in graphene/ferromagnetic structures, Physical Review B 99, 10.1103/physrevb.99.214446 (2019)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.214446 2019
[29]

J. M. Dueñas, S. G. de Castro, J. H. Garcia, and S. Roche, Optimal spin-charge interconversion in graphene through spin-pseudospin entanglement control, Communications Physics 10.1038/s42005-026- 02658-9 (2025)

work page doi:10.1038/s42005-026- 2025
[30]

Gmitra, D

M. Gmitra, D. Kochan, and J. Fabian, Spin-orbit cou- pling in hydrogenated graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 246602 (2013)

work page 2013
[31]

A. H. Castro Neto and F. Guinea, Impurity-induced spin- orbit coupling in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 026804 (2009)

work page 2009
[32]

Gmitra and J

M. Gmitra and J. Fabian, Graphene on transition-metal dichalcogenides: A platform for proximity spin-orbit physics and optospintronics, Phys. Rev. B 92, 155403 (2015)

work page 2015
[33]

Gmitra, D

M. Gmitra, D. Kochan, P. Högl, and J. Fabian, Trivial and inverted dirac bands and the emergence of quantum spin hall states in graphene on transition-metal dichalco- genides, Phys. Rev. B 93, 155104 (2016)

work page 2016
[34]

Gmitra and J

M. Gmitra and J. Fabian, Proximity effects in bilayer graphene on monolayer wse2: Field-effect spin valley locking, spin-orbit valve, and spin transistor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 146401 (2017)

work page 2017
[35]

J. H. Garcia, M. Vila, A. W. Cummings, and S. Roche, Spin transport in graphene/transition metal dichalco- genide heterostructures, Chemical Society Reviews 47, 3359 (2018)

work page 2018
[36]

H. Yang, B. Martín-García, J. Kimák, E. Schmoranze- rová, E. Dolan, Z. Chi, M. Gobbi, P. Němec, L. E. Hueso, and F. Casanova, Twist-angle-tunable spin tex- ture in wse2/graphene van der waals heterostructures, Nature Materials 23, 1502–1508 (2024)

work page 2024
[37]

H. Yang, Z. Chi, G. A vedissian, E. Dolan, M. Karup- pasamy, B. Martín-García, M. Gobbi, Z. Sofer, L. E. Hueso, and F. Casanova, Gate-tunable spin hall effect in trilayer graphene/group-iv monochalcogenide van der waals heterostructures, Advanced Functional Materials 34, 2404872 (2024) , https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/adfm.202404872

work page doi:10.1002/adfm.202404872 2024
[38]

Ontoso, C

N. Ontoso, C. K. Safeer, F. Herling, J. Ingla-Aynés, H. Yang, Z. Chi, B. Martin-Garcia, I. n. Robredo, M. G. Vergniory, F. de Juan, M. Reyes Calvo, L. E. Hueso, and F. Casanova, Unconventional charge-to-spin conver- sion in graphene/ mote2 van der waals heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 014053 (2023)

work page 2023
[39]

D. T. S. Perkins, A. Veneri, and A. Ferreira, Spin hall effect: Symmetry breaking, twisting, and giant disorder renormalization, Phys. Rev. B 109, L241404 (2024)

work page 2024
[40]

Monaco, A

C. Monaco, A. Ferreira, and R. Raimondi, Spin hall and inverse spin galvanic effects in graphene with strong in- terfacial spin-orbit coupling: A quasi-classical green’s function approach, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033137 (2021)

work page 2021
[41]

A. L. R. Barbosa, J. G. G. S. Ramos, and A. Ferreira, Ef- fect of proximity-induced spin-orbit coupling in graphene mesoscopic billiards, Phys. Rev. B 103, L081111 (2021)

work page 2021
[42]

R. O. Cunha, Y. Garcia-Basabe, D. G. Lar- rude, M. Gamino, E. N. Lima, F. Crasto de Lima, A. Fazzio, S. M. Rezende, A. Azevedo, and J. B. S. Mendes, Unraveling the spin-to-charge cur- rent conversion mechanism and charge transfer dy- namics at the interface of graphene/ws2 heterostruc- tures at room temperature, ACS Applied Materi- als & Interfaces 16, 56...

work page doi:10.1021/acsami.4c08539 2024
[43]

T. S. Ghiasi, A. A. Kaverzin, P. J. Blah, and B. J. van Wees, Charge-to-spin conversion by the rashba–edelstein effect in two-dimensional van der waals heterostructures up to room temperature, Nano Letters 19, 5959 (2019) , pMID: 31408607, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01611

work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01611 2019
[44]

Oﬀidani, M

M. Oﬀidani, M. Milletarì, R. Raimondi, and A. Fer- reira, Optimal charge-to-spin conversion in graphene on transition-metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 196801 (2017)

work page 2017
[45]

L. A. Benítez, W. Savero Torres, J. F. Sierra, M. Timmer- mans, J. H. Garcia, S. Roche, M. V. Costache, and S. O. Valenzuela, Tunable room-temperature spin galvanic and spin hall effects in van der waals heterostructures, Nature Materials 19, 170–175 (2020)

work page 2020
[46]

L. Li, J. Zhang, G. Myeong, W. Shin, H. Lim, B. Kim, S. Kim, T. Jin, S. Cavill, B. S. Kim, C. Kim, J. Lischner, A. Ferreira, and S. Cho, Gate- tunable reversible rashba–edelstein effect in a few- layer graphene/2h-tas2 heterostructure at room temper- ature, ACS Nano 14, 5251 (2020) , pMID: 32267673, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c01037

work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c01037 2020
[47]

S. A. Cavill, C. Huang, M. Oﬀidani, Y.-H. Lin, M. A. Cazalilla, and A. Ferreira, Proposal for unambiguous electrical detection of spin-charge conversion in lateral spin valves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 236803 (2020)

work page 2020
[48]

Khokhriakov, A

D. Khokhriakov, A. M. Hoque, B. Karpiak, and S. P. Dash, Gate-tunable spin-galvanic effect in graphene- topological insulator van der waals heterostructures at room temperature, Nature Communications 11, 10.1038/s41467-020-17481-1 (2020)

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17481-1 2020
[49]

D. B. Fonseca, L. F. C. Pereira, and A. L. Barbosa, Lévy flight for electrons in graphene: Superdiffusive-to- diffusive transport transition, Physical Review B 107, 155432 (2023)

work page 2023
[50]

D. B. Fonseca, A. L. R. Barbosa, and L. F. C. Pereira, Lévy flight for electrons in graphene in the presence of regions with enhanced spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B 110, 075421 (2024)

work page 2024
[51]

J. M. Caridad, S. Connaughton, C. Ott, H. B. Weber, and V. Krstić, An electrical analogy to mie scattering, Nature Communications 7, 12894 (2016)

work page 2016
[52]

Gutiérrez, L

C. Gutiérrez, L. Brown, C.-J. Kim, J. Park, and A. Pasupathy, Klein tunnelling and electron trapping in nanometre-scale graphene quantum dots, Nature Physics 12 (2016)

work page 2016
[53]

Fehske, G

H. Fehske, G. Hager, and A. Pieper, Electron con- finement in graphene with gate-defined quantum dots, physica status solidi (b) 252, 1868 (2015) , https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/pssb.201552119

work page doi:10.1002/pssb.201552119 2015
[54]

Sadrara and M

M. Sadrara and M. Miri, Dirac electron scattering from a cluster of electrostatically defined quantum dots in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 99, 155432 (2019)

work page 2019
[55]

C. K. Safeer, J. Ingla-Aynés, N. Ontoso, F. Herling, W. Yan, L. E. Hueso, and F. Casanova, Spin hall effect in bilayer graphene combined with an insulator up to room temperature, Nano Letters 20, 4573–4579 (2020) . 9

work page 2020
[56]

H. Yang, M. Ormaza, Z. Chi, E. Dolan, J. Ingla-Aynés, C. Safeer, F. Herling, N. Ontoso, M. Gobbi, B. Martín- García, F. Schiller, L. E. Hueso, and F. Casanova, Gate-tunable spin hall effect in an all-light-element het- erostructure: Graphene with copper oxide, Nano Letters 23, 4406–4414 (2023)

work page 2023
[57]

B. K. Nikolić, L. P. Zârbo, and S. Souma, Mesoscopic spin hall effect in multiprobe ballistic spin-orbit-coupled semiconductor bridges, Phys. Rev. B 72, 075361 (2005)

work page 2005
[58]

J. H. Bardarson, i. d. I. Adagideli, and P. Jacquod, Mesoscopic spin hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 196601 (2007)

work page 2007
[59]

F. A. F. Santana, J. M. da Silva, T. C. Vasconcelos, J. G. G. S. Ramos, and A. L. R. Barbosa, Spin hall angle fluc- tuations in a device with disorder, Phys. Rev. B 102, 041107 (2020)

work page 2020
[60]

J. M. da Silva, F. A. F. Santana, J. G. G. S. Ramos, and A. L. R. Barbosa, Spin Hall angle in single- layer graphene, Journal of Applied Physics 132, 183901 (2022) , https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0107212/16516946/183901_1_online.pdf

work page doi:10.1063/5.0107212/16516946/183901_1_online.pdf 2022
[61]

D. B. Fonseca, L. L. A. Pereira, and A. L. R. Barbosa, Orbital hall effect in mesoscopic devices, Phys. Rev. B 108, 245105 (2023)

work page 2023
[62]

A. L. R. Barbosa, L. M. Canonico, J. H. García, and T. G. Rappoport, Orbital hall effect and topology on a two-dimensional triangular lattice: From bulk to edge, Phys. Rev. B 110, 085412 (2024)

work page 2024
[63]

A. L. R. Barbosa, H.-W. Lee, and T. G. Rappoport, Ex- trinsic orbital hall effect and orbital relaxation in meso- scopic devices (2025), arXiv:2507.01941 [cond-mat.mes- hall]

work page arXiv 2025
[64]

C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, and X. Waintal, Kwant: a software package for quantum transport, New Journal of Physics 16, 063065 (2014)

work page 2014
[65]

T. P. Cysne, A. Ferreira, and T. G. Rappoport, Crystal- field effects in graphene with interface-induced spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B 98, 045407 (2018)

work page 2018
[66]

T. P. Cysne, J. H. Garcia, A. R. Rocha, and T. G. Rap- poport, Quantum hall effect in graphene with interface- induced spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B 97, 085413 (2018)

work page 2018
[67]

S. a. d. A. Sousa-Júnior, M. V. d. S. Ferraz, J. P. de Lima, and T. P. Cysne, Topological characterization of modi- fied kane-mele-rashba models via local spin chern marker, Phys. Rev. B 111, 035411 (2025)

work page 2025
[68]

A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009)

work page 2009