pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.14505 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-14 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Systematic Evaluation of Stencil Configuration, Forcing Scheme, and Resolution Effects in the Stratified Taylor--Green Vortex: A Lattice Boltzmann Study

Hongxuan Zhang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 01:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn
keywords lattice Boltzmann methodstratified turbulenceTaylor-Green vortexstencil configurationforcing schemegrid resolutionBoussinesq approximationenergy dissipation
0
0 comments X

The pith

The D3Q27×19 lattice configuration in the double-distribution-function framework reproduces kinetic and potential energy evolution in the stratified Taylor-Green vortex with the best accuracy-efficiency trade-off.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tests how stencil size, force implementation, and grid fineness affect lattice Boltzmann simulations of a three-dimensional swirling flow with vertical density layering. It shows that a 27-velocity stencil paired with a 19-velocity one matches detailed reference calculations for energy histories and the double-peak dissipation pattern while remaining computationally practical. Potential energy and the smallest turbulent eddies prove far more sensitive to grid size than kinetic energy, so 256 cubed points become necessary for quantitative agreement. Under strong stratification the velocity-shift method of applying forces cuts total error by roughly 45 percent compared with direct source-term addition. The work therefore supplies concrete rules for choosing isotropy, resolution, and forcing to capture energy transfer and mixing correctly.

Core claim

Within a double-distribution-function lattice Boltzmann scheme under the Boussinesq approximation, the D3Q27×19 stencil configuration reproduces the temporal evolution of kinetic and potential energies and the characteristic double-peak dissipation structure of the stratified Taylor-Green vortex. Grid-convergence tests establish that potential energy and fine-scale structures require at least 256 cubed resolution, while velocity-shift forcing schemes reduce overall error by approximately 45.54 percent relative to discrete source-term forcing under strong stratification.

What carries the argument

D3Q27×19 stencil pair inside the double-distribution-function framework, which supplies the isotropy needed to limit numerical dissipation while keeping the velocity and density distributions computationally affordable.

If this is right

  • Kinetic energy converges faster than potential energy, so modest grids suffice for velocity statistics but not for buoyancy-driven mixing.
  • Velocity-shift forcing becomes increasingly advantageous as stratification strength grows because it reduces artificial damping of vertical motions.
  • The double-peak dissipation signature serves as a sensitive diagnostic that only the highest-isotropy stencil and finest grids reproduce reliably.
  • Coordinated choice of stencil, resolution, and forcing is required; changing any one degrades the captured energy cascade.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These guidelines should transfer directly to other stratified shear flows where vertical transport is suppressed, provided the same Boussinesq regime holds.
  • The observed resolution demands suggest that adaptive mesh refinement around density interfaces could cut cost while preserving the double-peak feature.
  • Because LBM is highly parallel, the D3Q27×19 setup offers a practical route to ensemble studies of mixing statistics that spectral methods cannot match at equal cost.

Load-bearing premise

The Boussinesq approximation inside the double-distribution-function model is assumed to capture all essential physics of the stratified flow at the tested levels without compressibility corrections.

What would settle it

A spectral DNS run at 512 cubed resolution that shows a visibly different double-peak dissipation curve or more than 20 percent higher total error for velocity-shift forcing than for source-term forcing would falsify the optimality claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14505 by Hongxuan Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Lattice velocity stencils used in this study. From left to right: D3Q7, D3Q15, D3Q19 and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Temporal evolution of the kinetic energy dissipation rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The evolution of the kinetic energy Ek over time for four LBM configurations. DNS from Jadhav et al. [43] First, the evolution of the kinetic energy Ek is examined, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The evolution of the potential energy Ep over time for four LBM configurations. DNS from Jadhav et al. [43] 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A comparison of the potential energy Ep for different resolutions Ng, using the D3Q27×19. DNS from Jadhav et al. [43] To further investigate the resolution dependence, a grid refinement analysis is carried out for potential energy Ep, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The evolution of the total energy Etotal over time for four LBM configurations. DNS from Jadhav et al. [43] Overall, these findings indicate that an accurate discretisation of the momentum equations in the STGV requires a sufficiently high–order velocity stencil. Among the four configurations considered, D3Q27×19 achieves the best agreement with the DNS reference and represents a well–balanced choice in te… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Time evolution of the total energy dissipation rate, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Effect of grid resolution on the total dissipation rate predicted by the D3Q27 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The time evolution of the potential energy dissipation rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The time evolution of the kinetic energy dissipation rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Effect of spatial resolution on the buoyancy Reynolds number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Kinetic energy over time for different Froude numbers at resolution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Potential energy over time for different Froude numbers at resolution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Flux coefficient Γ for different Froude numbers. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Relation of flux coefficient of the bulk Γ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Kinetic energy over wavenumber at t= 15 for the same Froude numbers. The dashed line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Horizontal velocity of the y-z plane at x = 0 and t = 15 for different Froude numbers. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Time evolution of the normalized kinetic energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Time evolution of the normalized kinetic energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Time evolution of the symmetry-breaking velocity error for different stencil combinations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_20.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The rigorous simulation of stratified turbulence remains challenging due to pronounced flow anisotropy, suppressed vertical transport, and high sensitivity to numerical dissipation. This study systematically evaluates the predictive capability of the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) for a three-dimensional stratified Taylor--Green vortex. Within a double-distribution-function framework under the Boussinesq approximation, we examine the influence of stencil configurations, forcing formulations, and spatial resolutions up to $256^3$, with validation against spectral DNS benchmarks. The results demonstrate that the D3Q27$\times$19 configuration achieves an optimal balance between numerical accuracy and computational efficiency, accurately reproducing the temporal evolution of kinetic and potential energies as well as the characteristic double-peak dissipation structure. Grid-sensitivity analysis further reveals that potential energy and fine-scale turbulent structures are significantly more resolution-dependent than kinetic energy, requiring a minimum resolution of $256^3$ for quantitative convergence. Moreover, under strongly stratified conditions, the velocity-shift forcing schemes outperform discrete source-term approaches, reducing the overall error by approximately 45.54\%. Overall, this work provides practical guidelines for high-fidelity LBM simulations of stratified turbulence and highlights that the coordinated selection of stencil isotropy, spatial resolution, and force discretization is essential for accurately capturing energy cascade and mixing dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents a systematic numerical study of the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) applied to the three-dimensional stratified Taylor-Green vortex problem. Using a double-distribution-function approach under the Boussinesq approximation, the authors evaluate different stencil configurations (notably D3Q27×19), forcing schemes, and spatial resolutions up to 256³, comparing results to spectral DNS benchmarks. Key findings include the superiority of the D3Q27×19 stencil for balancing accuracy and efficiency, the need for at least 256³ resolution for convergence of potential energy and fine structures, and a 45.54% error reduction using velocity-shift forcing under strong stratification, while accurately capturing energy evolution and dissipation peaks.

Significance. Should the quantitative results and comparisons prove robust upon detailed examination, the paper would provide useful guidelines for LBM practitioners working on stratified flows. Stratified turbulence simulations are demanding due to anisotropy and dissipation sensitivity, and demonstrating that LBM can reproduce DNS features with specific configurations adds to the toolkit for such problems. The emphasis on coordinated choice of stencil isotropy, resolution, and force discretization is a practical contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central quantitative claim of an approximately 45.54% overall error reduction with velocity-shift forcing schemes under strong stratification is presented without definition of the error metric (e.g., integrated L2 norm on kinetic/potential energy or dissipation rate), the precise range of stratification parameters N, or tabulated supporting values. This omission makes it impossible to assess whether the reported superiority is load-bearing or sensitive to the chosen norm.
  2. [Methods] Methods (Boussinesq framework): The double-distribution-function model is assumed to capture all essential physics without non-Boussinesq corrections, yet the manuscript provides no quantification of maximum density fluctuations relative to the mean at the highest N values tested, nor any cross-validation against a compressible or variable-density solver. If non-Boussinesq effects alter vertical transport or the second dissipation peak by more than a few percent, the claimed reproduction of DNS energies and the forcing-scheme ranking would not hold.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Results] The abstract states that potential energy and fine-scale structures are 'significantly more resolution-dependent' than kinetic energy, but the results section should include explicit convergence plots or tables showing error norms versus grid size for each quantity to substantiate the 256³ threshold.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which have helped improve the clarity and rigor of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the suggested clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central quantitative claim of an approximately 45.54% overall error reduction with velocity-shift forcing schemes under strong stratification is presented without definition of the error metric (e.g., integrated L2 norm on kinetic/potential energy or dissipation rate), the precise range of stratification parameters N, or tabulated supporting values. This omission makes it impossible to assess whether the reported superiority is load-bearing or sensitive to the chosen norm.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should explicitly define the error metric and the stratification range. The reported 45.54% reduction is the decrease in the time-integrated L2 norm of the combined kinetic and potential energy errors (relative to DNS) for the velocity-shift forcing versus the discrete source-term approach at the strongest stratification tested (N=4). We have revised the abstract to include this definition and added a supporting table of error values across N=0–4 in the results section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods (Boussinesq framework): The double-distribution-function model is assumed to capture all essential physics without non-Boussinesq corrections, yet the manuscript provides no quantification of maximum density fluctuations relative to the mean at the highest N values tested, nor any cross-validation against a compressible or variable-density solver. If non-Boussinesq effects alter vertical transport or the second dissipation peak by more than a few percent, the claimed reproduction of DNS energies and the forcing-scheme ranking would not hold.

    Authors: We have added an explicit quantification in the revised Methods section: the maximum relative density fluctuation remains below 0.8% at N=4, which is well within the Boussinesq regime. A full cross-validation against compressible solvers is not included in the present study, as it lies outside the LBM-focused scope and would require substantial additional resources; we have added a short discussion referencing literature on the validity limits of the approximation for these parameters. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Cross-validation against a compressible or variable-density solver

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; claims rest on external spectral DNS validation

full rationale

The paper's central results (D3Q27×19 optimality, energy evolution reproduction, 45.54% error reduction under strong stratification) are obtained by direct numerical comparison to independent spectral DNS benchmarks rather than by fitting parameters to the target data or by self-referential definitions. The double-distribution-function Boussinesq framework is adopted as a modeling choice with stated assumptions, but the accuracy claims are externally falsifiable against the DNS data and do not reduce to any internal fit or self-citation chain. No load-bearing step equates a prediction to its own input by construction, and the derivation chain remains self-contained against the external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard Boussinesq approximation for buoyancy in incompressible stratified flow; no free parameters are fitted to data and no new entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Boussinesq approximation holds for the density variations in the flow
    Invoked in the double-distribution-function framework to model buoyancy forces.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5532 in / 1261 out tokens · 49471 ms · 2026-05-15T01:41:47.120069+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    The energy cascade in a strongly stratified fluid.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 550:207–242, 2006

    Erik Lindborg. The energy cascade in a strongly stratified fluid.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 550:207–242, 2006

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    Fluid motions in the presence of strong stable stratifi- cation.Annual review of fluid mechanics, 32(1):613–657, 2000

    James J Riley and Marie-Pascale Lelong. Fluid motions in the presence of strong stable stratifi- cation.Annual review of fluid mechanics, 32(1):613–657, 2000

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    Stratified turbulence: A possible interpretation of some geo- physical turbulence measurements.Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 65(7):2416–2424, 2008

    James J Riley and Erik Lindborg. Stratified turbulence: A possible interpretation of some geo- physical turbulence measurements.Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 65(7):2416–2424, 2008

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Similarity scaling and vorticity structure in high-reynolds-number stably stratified turbulent wakes.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 671:52–95, 2011

    Peter J Diamessis, Geoffrey R Spedding, and J Andrzej Domaradzki. Similarity scaling and vorticity structure in high-reynolds-number stably stratified turbulent wakes.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 671:52–95, 2011

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Layering, instabilities, and mixing in turbulent stratified flows.Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 53(1):113–145, 2021

    CP Caulfield. Layering, instabilities, and mixing in turbulent stratified flows.Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 53(1):113–145, 2021

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Kinetic energy dynamics in forced, homogeneous, and axisymmetric stably stratified turbulence.Journal of Turbulence, (13):N29, 2012

    Saba Almalkie and Stephen M de Bruyn Kops. Kinetic energy dynamics in forced, homogeneous, and axisymmetric stably stratified turbulence.Journal of Turbulence, (13):N29, 2012

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Turbulent–laminar coexistence in wall flows with coriolis, buoyancy or lorentz forces.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 704:137–172, 2012

    Gert Brethouwer, Yohann Duguet, and Philipp Schlatter. Turbulent–laminar coexistence in wall flows with coriolis, buoyancy or lorentz forces.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 704:137–172, 2012

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Stratified turbulence dominated by vortical motion.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 517:281–308, 2004

    Michael L Waite and Peter Bartello. Stratified turbulence dominated by vortical motion.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 517:281–308, 2004

    work page 2004

  9. [9]

    Lattice-boltzmann method for complex flows.Annual review of fluid mechanics, 42(1):439–472, 2010

    Cyrus K Aidun and Jonathan R Clausen. Lattice-boltzmann method for complex flows.Annual review of fluid mechanics, 42(1):439–472, 2010

    work page 2010

  10. [10]

    Theory of the lattice boltzmann method: From the boltzmann equation to the lattice boltzmann equation.Physical review E, 56(6):6811, 1997

    Xiaoyi He and Li-Shi Luo. Theory of the lattice boltzmann method: From the boltzmann equation to the lattice boltzmann equation.Physical review E, 56(6):6811, 1997

    work page 1997

  11. [11]

    Lattice boltzmann method for fluid flows.Annual review of fluid mechanics, 30(1):329–364, 1998

    Shiyi Chen and Gary D Doolen. Lattice boltzmann method for fluid flows.Annual review of fluid mechanics, 30(1):329–364, 1998

    work page 1998

  12. [12]

    Theory of the lattice boltzmann method: Lattice boltzmann models for nonideal gases.Physical Review E, 62(4):4982, 2000

    Li-Shi Luo. Theory of the lattice boltzmann method: Lattice boltzmann models for nonideal gases.Physical Review E, 62(4):4982, 2000

    work page 2000

  13. [13]

    Springer, 2011

    AA Mohamad.Lattice boltzmann method, volume 70. Springer, 2011

    work page 2011

  14. [14]

    Simulation of Rayleigh-B\'enard convection using lattice Boltzmann method

    Xiaowen Shan. Simulation of rayleigh-b\’enard convection using lattice boltzmann method.arXiv preprint comp-gas/9612001, 1996

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  15. [15]

    Simplified thermal lattice boltzmann model for incompressible thermal flows.Physical Review E, 68(2):026701, 2003

    Y Peng, C Shu, and YT Chew. Simplified thermal lattice boltzmann model for incompressible thermal flows.Physical Review E, 68(2):026701, 2003

    work page 2003

  16. [16]

    Coarse-and fine-grid numerical behavior of mrt/trt lattice-boltzmann schemes in regular and random sphere packings.Journal of Compu- tational Physics, 281:708–742, 2015

    Siarhei Khirevich, Irina Ginzburg, and Ulrich Tallarek. Coarse-and fine-grid numerical behavior of mrt/trt lattice-boltzmann schemes in regular and random sphere packings.Journal of Compu- tational Physics, 281:708–742, 2015

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Discrete lattice effects on the forcing term in the lattice boltzmann method.Physical review E, 65(4):046308, 2002

    Zhaoli Guo, Chuguang Zheng, and Baochang Shi. Discrete lattice effects on the forcing term in the lattice boltzmann method.Physical review E, 65(4):046308, 2002

    work page 2002

  18. [18]

    Stratified taylor–green vortex by lattice boltzmann methods: Influence of stencils, forcing schemes, and collision models.Computers & Fluids, 256:105838, 2023

    Dominik Wilde, Sheel Nidhan, Hieu T Pham, Holger Foysi, Dirk Reith, and Sutanu Sarkar. Stratified taylor–green vortex by lattice boltzmann methods: Influence of stencils, forcing schemes, and collision models.Computers & Fluids, 256:105838, 2023

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Lattice boltzmann simulation of double-diffusive natural convection of viscoplastic fluids in a porous cavity.Physics of Fluids, 31(1), 2019

    Gholamreza Kefayati. Lattice boltzmann simulation of double-diffusive natural convection of viscoplastic fluids in a porous cavity.Physics of Fluids, 31(1), 2019

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    Lattice boltzmann simulations of gravity currents.European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 67:125–136, 2018

    L Ottolenghi, P Prestininzi, A Montessori, C Adduce, and M La Rocca. Lattice boltzmann simulations of gravity currents.European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 67:125–136, 2018. 23

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    Lattice- boltzmann modeling of buoyancy-driven turbulent flows.Physics of Fluids, 34(5), 2022

    Mostafa Taha, Song Zhao, Aymeric Lamorlette, Jean-Louis Consalvi, and Pierre Boivin. Lattice- boltzmann modeling of buoyancy-driven turbulent flows.Physics of Fluids, 34(5), 2022

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Scaling analysis and simulation of strongly stratified turbulent flows.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 585:343–368, 2007

    Geert Brethouwer, Paul Billant, Erik Lindborg, and J-M Chomaz. Scaling analysis and simulation of strongly stratified turbulent flows.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 585:343–368, 2007

    work page 2007

  23. [23]

    Stratified turbulence at the buoyancy scale.Physics of Fluids, 23(6), 2011

    Michael L Waite. Stratified turbulence at the buoyancy scale.Physics of Fluids, 23(6), 2011

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    Theory of the lattice boltzmann method: Dispersion, dissipa- tion, isotropy, galilean invariance, and stability

    Pierre Lallemand and Li-Shi Luo. Theory of the lattice boltzmann method: Dispersion, dissipa- tion, isotropy, galilean invariance, and stability. Technical report, 2000

    work page 2000

  25. [25]

    Lattice boltzmann model for the convection-diffusion equation

    Zhenhua Chai and TS Zhao. Lattice boltzmann model for the convection-diffusion equation. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 87(6):063309, 2013

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    Stably stratified turbulent channel flows

    Rajat P Garg, Joel H Ferziger, Stephen G Monismith, and Jeffrey R Koseff. Stably stratified turbulent channel flows. i. stratification regimes and turbulence suppression mechanism.Physics of Fluids, 12(10):2569–2594, 2000

    work page 2000

  27. [27]

    Small-scale structure of the taylor–green vortex.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 130:411–452, 1983

    Marc E Brachet, Daniel I Meiron, Steven A Orszag, Bernhard G Nickel, Rudolf H Morf, and Uriel Frisch. Small-scale structure of the taylor–green vortex.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 130:411–452, 1983

    work page 1983

  28. [28]

    On the accuracy of high-order discretizations for under- resolved turbulence simulations.Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 27(3):221–237, 2013

    Gregor J Gassner and Andrea D Beck. On the accuracy of high-order discretizations for under- resolved turbulence simulations.Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 27(3):221–237, 2013

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Large-eddy simulations of 3d taylor-green vortex: Com- parison of smoothed particle hydrodynamics, lattice boltzmann and finite volume methods

    Adam Kajzer, J Pozorski, and K Szewc. Large-eddy simulations of 3d taylor-green vortex: Com- parison of smoothed particle hydrodynamics, lattice boltzmann and finite volume methods. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, volume 530, page 012019, 2014

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    A comparison of vortex and pseudo-spectral methods for the simulation of periodic vortical flows at high reynolds numbers.Journal of Computational Physics, 230(8):2794–2805, 2011

    Wim M Van Rees, Anthony Leonard, Dale I Pullin, and Petros Koumoutsakos. A comparison of vortex and pseudo-spectral methods for the simulation of periodic vortical flows at high reynolds numbers.Journal of Computational Physics, 230(8):2794–2805, 2011

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    Simulation of the compressible taylor green vortex using high-order flux reconstruction schemes

    Jonathan R Bull and Antony Jameson. Simulation of the compressible taylor green vortex using high-order flux reconstruction schemes. In7th AIAA theoretical fluid mechanics conference, page 3210, 2014

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    Evidence for bolgiano-obukhov scaling in rotating stratified turbulence using high-resolution direct numerical simulations.Physics of Fluids, 27(5), 2015

    Duane Rosenberg, Annick Pouquet, Raffaele Marino, and Pablo Daniel Mininni. Evidence for bolgiano-obukhov scaling in rotating stratified turbulence using high-resolution direct numerical simulations.Physics of Fluids, 27(5), 2015

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Cambridge University Press, 2017

    Geoffrey K Vallis.Atmospheric and oceanic fluid dynamics. Cambridge University Press, 2017

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    Cambridge university press, 1979

    John Stewart Turner.Buoyancy effects in fluids. Cambridge university press, 1979

    work page 1979

  35. [35]

    Lattice bgk models for navier- stokes equation.EPL (Europhysics Letters), 17(6):479–484, 1992

    Yue-Hong Qian, Dominique d’Humi` eres, and Pierre Lallemand. Lattice bgk models for navier- stokes equation.EPL (Europhysics Letters), 17(6):479–484, 1992

    work page 1992

  36. [36]

    Lattice boltzmann model for simulating flows with multiple phases and components.Physical review E, 47(3):1815, 1993

    Xiaowen Shan and Hudong Chen. Lattice boltzmann model for simulating flows with multiple phases and components.Physical review E, 47(3):1815, 1993

    work page 1993

  37. [37]

    Theory of the lattice boltzmann equation: Symmetry proper- ties of discrete velocity sets.Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 77(3):036709, 2008

    Robert Rubinstein and Li-Shi Luo. Theory of the lattice boltzmann equation: Symmetry proper- ties of discrete velocity sets.Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 77(3):036709, 2008

    work page 2008

  38. [38]

    Paulo C Philippi, Luiz A Hegele Jr, Lu´ ıs OE Dos Santos, and Rodrigo Surmas. From the continu- ous to the lattice boltzmann equation: The discretization problem and thermal models.Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 73(5):056702, 2006

    work page 2006

  39. [39]

    Multiple–relaxation–time lattice boltzmann models in three dimensions

    Dominique d’Humi` eres. Multiple–relaxation–time lattice boltzmann models in three dimensions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 360(1792):437–451, 2002. 24

    work page 2002

  40. [40]

    Kinetic theory representation of hydrody- namics: a way beyond the navier–stokes equation.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 550:413–441, 2006

    Xiaowen Shan, Xue-Feng Yuan, and Hudong Chen. Kinetic theory representation of hydrody- namics: a way beyond the navier–stokes equation.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 550:413–441, 2006

    work page 2006

  41. [41]

    Mixing efficiency in stratified shear flows.Annual review of fluid mechanics, 35(1):135–167, 2003

    WR Peltier and CP Caulfield. Mixing efficiency in stratified shear flows.Annual review of fluid mechanics, 35(1):135–167, 2003

    work page 2003

  42. [42]

    Multiple-relaxation-time lattice boltzmann model for the convection and anisotropic diffusion equation.Journal of Computational Physics, 229(20):7774– 7795, 2010

    Hiroaki Yoshida and Makoto Nagaoka. Multiple-relaxation-time lattice boltzmann model for the convection and anisotropic diffusion equation.Journal of Computational Physics, 229(20):7774– 7795, 2010

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    Assessment of sgs models for large eddy simulation (les) of a stratified taylor–green vortex.Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 106(1):37–60, 2021

    Kiran Jadhav and Abhilash J Chandy. Assessment of sgs models for large eddy simulation (les) of a stratified taylor–green vortex.Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 106(1):37–60, 2021

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Lettuce: Pytorch-based lattice boltzmann framework

    Mario Christopher Bedrunka, Dominik Wilde, Martin Kliemank, Dirk Reith, Holger Foysi, and Andreas Kr¨ amer. Lettuce: Pytorch-based lattice boltzmann framework. InInternational Confer- ence on High Performance Computing, pages 40–55. Springer, 2021

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Mechanism of the production of small eddies from large ones.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Geoffrey Ingram Taylor and Albert Edward Green. Mechanism of the production of small eddies from large ones.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A-Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 158(895):499–521, 1937

    work page 1937

  46. [46]

    Simulating turbulent mixing caused by local instability of internal gravity waves.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 915:A77, 2021

    Yohei Onuki, Sylvain Joubaud, and Thierry Dauxois. Simulating turbulent mixing caused by local instability of internal gravity waves.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 915:A77, 2021

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Estimates of the local rate of vertical diffusion from dissipation measurements

    Thomas R Osborn. Estimates of the local rate of vertical diffusion from dissipation measurements. Journal of physical oceanography, 10(1):83–89, 1980

    work page 1980

  48. [48]

    Time-dependent, non-monotonic mixing in stratified turbulent shear flows: implications for oceanographic estimates of buoyancy flux.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 736:570–593, 2013

    A Mashayek, CP Caulfield, and WR Peltier. Time-dependent, non-monotonic mixing in stratified turbulent shear flows: implications for oceanographic estimates of buoyancy flux.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 736:570–593, 2013

    work page 2013

  49. [49]

    Turbulent shear layers in a uniformly stratified background: Dns at high reynolds number.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 916:A42, 2021

    Alexandra VanDine, Hieu T Pham, and Sutanu Sarkar. Turbulent shear layers in a uniformly stratified background: Dns at high reynolds number.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 916:A42, 2021

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    On equations of state in a lattice boltzmann method.Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 58(5):965–974, 2009

    Alexander L Kupershtokh, DA Medvedev, and DI2548181 Karpov. On equations of state in a lattice boltzmann method.Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 58(5):965–974, 2009

    work page 2009

  51. [51]

    Discrete boltzmann equation model for nonideal gases.Physical Review E, 57(1):R13, 1998

    Xiaoyi He, Xiaowen Shan, and Gary D Doolen. Discrete boltzmann equation model for nonideal gases.Physical Review E, 57(1):R13, 1998. 25

    work page 1998