arxiv: 2605.14985 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-14 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · cond-mat.supr-con· quant-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Larkin-Ovchinnikov-Fulde-Ferrell state of spin polarized atomic Fermi superfluid on a spherical surface

Yan He , Chih-Chun Chien

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.supr-conquant-ph

keywords LOFF stateFermi superfluidspin polarizationspherical shellBogoliubov-de Gennesorder parameterphase diagrampopulation imbalance

0 comments

The pith

Spin-polarized Fermi superfluids on a spherical surface support LOFF states with multiple nodes that become more stable at higher polarization but only near the uniform phase boundary.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors apply the Bogoliubov-de Gennes formalism to population-imbalanced atomic Fermi gases confined to a thin spherical shell. They map out the phase boundary where uniform superfluid solutions disappear because the order parameter vanishes. Near this boundary, they find convergent solutions for LOFF states featuring spatially varying order parameters and densities. Comparing grand potentials shows that LOFF states with more nodes are energetically preferred as spin polarization increases. Yet these modulated states exist only in a narrow region close to the boundary, underscoring their fragility in spherical geometry.

Core claim

By solving the BdG equations for spin-polarized Fermi gases in a thin spherical shell, the work identifies LOFF states with modulating order parameters that survive near the phase boundary where uniform solutions cease to exist. The LOFF states with multiple nodes in the order parameter become more stable at higher spin polarization when compared via grand potentials, although the LOFF phase remains confined to a narrow parameter range adjacent to the boundary.

What carries the argument

The mean-field Bogoliubov-de Gennes (BdG) equations solved on a spherical surface for the pairing order parameter, which allow spatially modulated LOFF solutions with nodes.

If this is right

LOFF states with multiple nodes are energetically favored over fewer-node variants at higher spin imbalance.
The region of LOFF stability shrinks to a thin strip adjacent to the uniform superfluid disappearance line.
Both the order parameter and particle densities exhibit spatial modulations in the LOFF phase.
Uniform solutions dominate away from the boundary, limiting LOFF to high-polarization edges.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Experiments in spherical traps may require fine-tuning close to the critical polarization to detect LOFF modulations.
Neglected effects like finite temperature or shell thickness could further narrow or eliminate the LOFF window.
Similar fragility might appear in other compact geometries such as cylindrical or toroidal traps.
Testing grand potential differences numerically beyond mean-field could confirm the stability trend.

Load-bearing premise

The thin spherical shell approximation together with the mean-field BdG treatment remains quantitatively accurate without significant corrections from radial thickness, quantum fluctuations, or finite-temperature effects.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of the order parameter modulation or grand potential comparison in a spherical trap showing whether multi-node LOFF solutions persist only near the polarization where uniform pairing vanishes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14985 by Chih-Chun Chien, Yan He.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: shows µ, h and ∆ of the uniform solutions as functions of − ln(kF a) at T = 0 for p = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 µ/ EF 0 2 4 6 8 h/EF -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 -ln(kF a) 0 2 4 6 ∆/ EF (a) (b) (c) FIG. 1. Uniform solutions showing (a) µ, (b) h, and (c) ∆ as functions of − ln(kF a) at T = 0. The solid, dash, and dotted lines are for p = 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5, respectively. No uniform solution can be found… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Phase diagram of spin polarized Fermi superfluid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. The expansion coefficients [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. The normalized grand potential per particle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. (Left) The order parameter ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

By implementing the Bogoliubov-de Gennes (BdG) formalism of population-imbalanced atomic Fermi gases with pairing interactions in a thin spherical shell, we characterize the Larkin-Ovchinnikov-Fulde-Ferrell (LOFF) state in such a compact geometry. We first construct a phase diagram showing where uniform solutions of spin-polarized Fermi superfluid from the BdG equation cease to exist due to the vanishing order parameter. Near the boundary, various LOFF states with spatially modulating order parameters and density profiles can survive as convergent solutions to the BdG equation. When both uniform and LOFF solutions are present, we compare their grand potentials to determine the energetically favorable state and find that the LOFF states with multiple nodes in the order parameter become more stable at higher spin polarization. However, the LOFF state only survives close to the phase boundary where the uniform solutions vanish, indicating fragility of the LOFF state on a spherical surface. We also briefly discuss possible implications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

LOFF states on the sphere only appear right at the uniform-solution boundary and grow somewhat more stable with polarization, but the thin-shell mean-field setup leaves their actual range uncertain.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this calculation finds LOFF states with multiple nodes in the order parameter on a thin spherical shell, and those states become relatively more stable as spin polarization rises, yet they only exist in a narrow window next to where the uniform superfluid solution disappears. That fragility is the central result. The authors solve the standard BdG equations for an imbalanced Fermi gas with pairing, map the boundary where uniform solutions cease to exist, and then locate convergent modulated solutions nearby. They compare grand potentials between the two families and report that the multi-node LOFF states win more often at higher imbalance. The numerics are presented as straightforward and convergent, which is the concrete advance over earlier LOFF work that stayed in flat or trap geometries. The phase diagram they sketch is new for this compact surface and could help experimental groups thinking about curved-shell traps. The soft spots are the usual ones for mean-field BdG on a thin shell. Radial thickness is set to zero, so any hybridization between radial excitations and angular modulations is missing; that could easily push the LOFF region farther from the uniform boundary. Fluctuation corrections are also left out, and on a compact two-dimensional manifold they are not obviously small. The abstract gives no parameter values, convergence tests, or error estimates, so the quantitative ordering of grand potentials is hard to judge without the full data. This is a solid numerical exercise for people already working on population-imbalanced Fermi gases in curved geometries. It does not claim to reorganize the field, but the specific stability trend is worth checking. I would send it to peer review so the numerics and the thin-shell approximation can be examined directly.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper implements the Bogoliubov-de Gennes (BdG) formalism for population-imbalanced Fermi superfluids confined to a thin spherical shell. It constructs a phase diagram for the disappearance of uniform solutions due to vanishing order parameter, identifies convergent LOFF solutions with spatially modulating order parameters and densities near that boundary, compares grand potentials to establish energetic preference, and concludes that multi-node LOFF states grow more stable with increasing spin polarization while remaining fragile because they exist only close to the uniform-solution boundary.

Significance. If the numerical stability ordering holds, the work provides a concrete characterization of LOFF states on a compact curved manifold, highlighting their fragility relative to flat-space or bulk geometries. This could inform future experiments with ultracold atoms in spherical-shell traps and tests of mean-field theory on finite manifolds.

major comments (2)

[results on grand-potential comparison] The central claim that multi-node LOFF states become more stable at higher polarization rests on grand-potential comparisons between uniform and modulated solutions. No quantitative values, error bars, or convergence tests for these potentials are reported, so the ordering cannot be independently verified (abstract and results section on numerical solutions).
[thin-shell BdG setup] The conclusion that LOFF states are fragile because they survive only near the uniform-solution boundary assumes the thin-shell limit is quantitatively accurate. No estimate is given for corrections arising from finite radial thickness, which could hybridize with angular modulations and extend the LOFF region (method section on spherical-shell approximation).

minor comments (2)

[BdG formalism] Notation for the spherical harmonics or angular momentum quantum numbers used in the BdG expansion should be defined explicitly at first use.
[phase diagram] The phase diagram would benefit from an inset or table listing the specific interaction strength and polarization values at which the grand-potential crossings occur.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address the two major comments point by point below, indicating the changes we will implement in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [results on grand-potential comparison] The central claim that multi-node LOFF states become more stable at higher polarization rests on grand-potential comparisons between uniform and modulated solutions. No quantitative values, error bars, or convergence tests for these potentials are reported, so the ordering cannot be independently verified (abstract and results section on numerical solutions).

Authors: We agree that quantitative values and convergence information would strengthen the presentation and allow independent verification. In the revised manuscript we will add a table (or supplementary figure) listing the grand-potential differences between the uniform and representative multi-node LOFF solutions at several polarization values. We will also include a brief convergence study with respect to the angular-momentum cutoff used in the spherical-harmonic expansion and report the numerical tolerance achieved in the self-consistent BdG iteration. Because the calculation is deterministic, statistical error bars are not applicable, but the achieved numerical precision will be stated explicitly. revision: yes
Referee: [thin-shell BdG setup] The conclusion that LOFF states are fragile because they survive only near the uniform-solution boundary assumes the thin-shell limit is quantitatively accurate. No estimate is given for corrections arising from finite radial thickness, which could hybridize with angular modulations and extend the LOFF region (method section on spherical-shell approximation).

Authors: The thin-shell approximation is adopted to isolate the effects of spherical curvature while keeping the numerical problem tractable. We acknowledge that a finite radial thickness could in principle couple to the angular modulations and alter the stability window. Providing a quantitative estimate of such corrections would require a full three-dimensional BdG treatment with radial degrees of freedom, which is beyond the scope of the present work. In the revision we will expand the discussion section to state this limitation explicitly and to note that the fragility conclusion is specific to the idealized thin-shell model. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: results follow from direct numerical solution of standard BdG equations

full rationale

The paper solves the Bogoliubov-de Gennes equations numerically on a thin spherical shell to locate uniform and spatially modulated LOFF solutions, then compares their grand potentials to determine stability. No parameters are fitted to the target LOFF properties, no order parameter is defined in terms of the quantities being predicted, and no load-bearing self-citations reduce the central claim to a tautology. The derivation chain consists of standard mean-field BdG minimization whose outputs are independent of the inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the numerical solution of the mean-field BdG equations in spherical geometry; the only free parameters are the interaction strength and the spin polarization, both treated as externally tunable inputs.

free parameters (2)

interaction strength
Controls the pairing gap scale and is scanned to locate the phase boundary.
spin polarization
Determines the imbalance between spin populations and is the primary axis of the phase diagram.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Mean-field BdG formalism is sufficient to capture the pairing physics in this regime.
Standard assumption for dilute ultracold Fermi gases near the BCS-BEC crossover.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5483 in / 1381 out tokens · 44883 ms · 2026-05-15T02:55:57.260873+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

phase diagram... LOFF states with multiple nodes... only survives close to the phase boundary

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

[1]

Within the uniform-solution regime Overlapping with the regime where uniform solutions can be found but near the phase boundary, the LOFF solutions can be obtained from the BdG equation. Fig. 3 shows some selected results of the LOFF solutions with diﬀerent pairing interactions and population imbalance. The left column shows how ∆ behaves on the spherical...

work page
[2]

tically to accommodate the polarization uniformly while the LOFF state allows modulating population imbalance in real space

35, and T = 0. tically to accommodate the polarization uniformly while the LOFF state allows modulating population imbalance in real space. We remark that a precise comparison between a LOFF state and a uniform state is complicated by the diﬀerent spin-resolved densities in the convergent BdG solutions, making an exact match of the polarization and chemic...

work page
[3]

2, the default solutions are phase separa- tion between BCS superﬂuid and polarized normal phase similar to 3D population imbalanced Fermi gases [54, 55]

Beyond the uniform-solution regime In the regime where uniform solutions are no longer possible in Fig. 2, the default solutions are phase separa- tion between BCS superﬂuid and polarized normal phase similar to 3D population imbalanced Fermi gases [54, 55]. We caution that phase separation with a BCS phase oc- cupying one part of the sphere and a polariz...

work page
[4]

A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Nonuniform state of superconductors, Zh. Eksperim. Teor. Fiz. 47, (1964)

work page 1964
[5]

Fulde and R

P. Fulde and R. A. Ferrell, Superconductivity in a strong spin-exchange ﬁeld, Phys. Rev. 135, A550 (1964)

work page 1964
[6]

Steglich, R

F. Steglich, R. Modler, P. Gegenwart, M. Deppe, M. Wei- den, M. Lang, C. Geibel, T. L¨ uhmann, C. Paulsen, J. Tholence, Y. ¯Onuki, M. Tachiki, and S. Takahashi, Ex- perimental evidence for a generalized ﬄo state in clean type-ii superconductors with short coherence length and enhanced pauli susceptibility, Physica C: Superconduc- tivity 263, 498 (1996), p...

work page 1996
[7]

Imajo, T

S. Imajo, T. Nomura, Y. Kohama, and K. Kindo, Emer- gent anisotropy in the fulde–ferrell–larkin–ovchinnikov state, Nature Communications 13, 5590 (2022)

work page 2022
[8]

Kinjo, M

K. Kinjo, M. Manago, S. Kitagawa, Z. Q. Mao, S. Yonezawa, Y. Maeno, and K. Ishida, Superconducting spin smecticity evidencing the fulde-ferrell-larkin- ovchinnikov state in sr 2ruo4, Science 376, 397 (2022), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.abb0332

work page doi:10.1126/science.abb0332 2022
[9]

P. Wan, O. Zheliuk, N. F. Q. Yuan, X. Peng, L. Zhang, M. Liang, U. Zeitler, S. Wiedmann, N. E. Hussey, T. T. M. Palstra, and J. Ye, Orbital fulde–ferrell–larkin– ovchinnikov state in an ising superconductor, Nature 619, 46 (2023)

work page 2023
[10]

A. I. Buzdin, Proximity eﬀects in superconductor– ferromagnet heterostructures, Reviews of Modern Physics 77, 935 (2005)

work page 2005
[11]

F. S. Bergeret, A. F. Volkov, and K. B. Efetov, Odd triplet superconductivity and related phenomena in superconductor-ferromagnet structures, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1321 (2005)

work page 2005
[12]

C. J. Pethick and H. Smith, Bose–Einstein Condensation in Dilute Gases , 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2008)

work page 2008
[13]

Ueda, Fundamentals and New Frontiers of Bose– Einstein Condensation (World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 2010)

M. Ueda, Fundamentals and New Frontiers of Bose– Einstein Condensation (World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 2010)

work page 2010
[14]

Zwerger, ed., The BCS–BEC Crossover and the Uni- tary Fermi Gas (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012)

W. Zwerger, ed., The BCS–BEC Crossover and the Uni- tary Fermi Gas (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012)

work page 2012
[15]

Y.-a. Liao, A. S. C. Rittner, T. Paprotta, W. Li, G. B. Partridge, R. G. Hulet, S. K. Baur, and E. J. Mueller, Spin imbalance in a one-dimensional Fermi gas, Nature 467, 567 (2010)

work page 2010
[16]

M. C. Revelle, J. A. Fry, B. A. Olsen, and R. G. Hulet, 1d to 3d crossover of a spin-imbalanced fermi gas, Physical Review Letters 117, 235301 (2016)

work page 2016
[17]

Dupuis, Larkin-ovchinnikov-fulde-ferrell state i n quasi-one-dimensional superconductors, Phys

N. Dupuis, Larkin-ovchinnikov-fulde-ferrell state i n quasi-one-dimensional superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 51, 9074 (1995)

work page 1995
[18]

Matsuda and H

Y. Matsuda and H. Shimahara, Fulde–ferrell–larkin–ovchinnikov state in heavy fermion superconductors, Journal of the Phys- ical Society of Japan 76, 051005 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.76.051005

work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.76.051005 2007
[19]

L. He, M. Jin, and P. Zhuang, Loﬀ pairing vs breached pairing in asymmetric fermion superﬂuids, Phys. Rev. B 73, 214527 (2006)

work page 2006
[20]

Q. Chen, Y. He, C.-C. Chien, and K. Levin, Theory of su- perﬂuids with population imbalance: Finite-temperature and bcs-bec crossover eﬀects, Phys. Rev. B 75, 014521 (2007)

work page 2007
[21]

J. J. Kinnunen, J. E. Baarsma, J.-P. Martikainen, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, The Fulde–Ferrell–Larkin–Ovchinnikov state for ultracold fermions in lattice and harmonic potentials: 9 a review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 046401 (2018)

work page 2018
[22]

R. A. Carollo, D. C. Aveline, B. Rhyno, S. Vishveshwara, C. Lannert, J. D. Murphree, E. R. Elliott, J. R. Williams, R. J. Thompson, and N. Lundblad, Observation of ultra- cold atomic bubbles in orbital microgravity, Nature 606, 281 (2022)

work page 2022
[23]

Lundblad, D

N. Lundblad, D. C. Aveline, A. Balaˇ z, E. Bentine, N. P. Bigelow, P. Boegel, M. A. Efremov, N. Gaaloul, M. Meis- ter, M. Olshanii, C. A. R. S. de Melo, A. Tononi, S. Vishveshwara, A. C. White, A. Wolf, and B. M. Gar- raway, Perspective on quantum bubbles in microgravity, Quantum Sci. Technol. 8, 024003 (2023)

work page 2023
[24]

S. G. Bhongale and E. Timmermans, Phase separated bec for high-sensitivity force measurement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 185301 (2008)

work page 2008
[25]

F¨ olling, A

S. F¨ olling, A. Widera, T. M¨ uller, F. Gerbier, and I. Bloch, Formation of spatial shell structure in the superﬂuid to mott insulator transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 060403 (2006)

work page 2006
[26]

F. Jia, Z. Huang, L. Qiu, R. Zhou, Y. Yan, and D. Wang, Expansion dynamics of a shell-shaped bose-einstein con- densate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 243402 (2022)

work page 2022
[27]

Tononi and L

A. Tononi and L. Salasnich, Bose-einstein condensatio n on the surface of a sphere, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 160403 (2019)

work page 2019
[28]

Tononi, F

A. Tononi, F. Cinti, and L. Salasnich, Quantum bubbles in microgravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 010402 (2020)

work page 2020
[29]

N. S. M´ oller, F. E. A. dos Santos, V. S. Bagnato, and A. Pelster, Bose–Einstein condensation on curved mani- folds, New J. Phys. 22, 063059 (2020)

work page 2020
[30]

Padavi´ c, K

K. Padavi´ c, K. Sun, C. Lannert, and S. Vishveshwara, Vortex-antivortex physics in shell-shaped bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 102, 043305 (2020)

work page 2020
[31]

S. J. Bereta, M. A. Caracanhas, and A. L. Fetter, Super- ﬂuid vortex dynamics on a spherical ﬁlm, Phys. Rev. A 103, 053306 (2021)

work page 2021
[32]

A. C. White, Triangular vortex lattices and giant vorti ces in rotating bubble bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 109, 013301 (2024)

work page 2024
[33]

Andriati, L

A. Andriati, L. Brito, L. Tomio, and A. Gammal, Stabil- ity of a bose-condensed mixture on a bubble trap, Phys. Rev. A 104, 033318 (2021)

work page 2021
[34]

A. Wolf, P. Boegel, M. Meister, A. Balaˇ z, N. Gaaloul, and M. A. Efremov, Shell-shaped bose-einstein conden- sates based on dual-species mixtures, Phys. Rev. A 106, 013309 (2022)

work page 2022
[35]

Lannert, T.-C

C. Lannert, T.-C. Wei, and S. Vishveshwara, Dynamics of condensate shells: Collective modes and expansion, Phys. Rev. A 75, 013611 (2007)

work page 2007
[36]

Rhyno, N

B. Rhyno, N. Lundblad, D. C. Aveline, C. Lannert, and S. Vishveshwara, Thermodynamics in expanding shell- shaped bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 104, 063310 (2021)

work page 2021
[37]

Tononi, A

A. Tononi, A. Pelster, and L. Salasnich, Topological su - perﬂuid transition in bubble-trapped condensates, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013122 (2022)

work page 2022
[38]

He and C.-C

Y. He and C.-C. Chien, Winding real and order- parameter spaces via lump solitons of spinor bec on sphere, J. Phys. B: : At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 56, 215303 (2023)

work page 2023
[39]

Boegel, A

P. Boegel, A. Wolf, M. Meister, and M. A. Efremov, Con- trolled expansion of shell-shaped bose–einstein conden- sates, Quantum Sci. Technol. 8, 034001 (2023)

work page 2023
[40]

Li and D

G. Li and D. K. Eﬁmkin, Equatorial waves in rotating bubble-trapped superﬂuids, Phys. Rev. A 107, 023319 (2023)

work page 2023
[41]

Ciardi, F

M. Ciardi, F. Cinti, G. Pellicane, and S. Prestipino, Su - persolid phases of bosonic particles in a bubble trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 026001 (2024)

work page 2024
[42]

Arazo, R

M. Arazo, R. Mayol, and M. Guilleumas, Shell-shaped condensates with gravitational sag: contact and dipolar interactions, New Journal of Physics 23, 113040 (2021)

work page 2021
[43]

Tononi and L

A. Tononi and L. Salasnich, Low-dimensional quantum gases in curved geometries, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 398 (2023)

work page 2023
[44]

Tononi and L

A. Tononi and L. Salasnich, Shell-shaped atomic gases, Phys. Rep. 1072, 1 (2024)

work page 2024
[45]

Cricchio, E

D. Cricchio, E. Fiordilino, and F. Persico, Electrons o n a spherical surface: Physical properties and hollow spheri- cal clusters, Phys. Rev. A 86, 013201 (2012)

work page 2012
[46]

Y. He, H. Guo, and C.-C. Chien, Bcs-bec crossover of atomic fermi superﬂuid in a spherical bubble trap, Phys. Rev. A 105, 033324 (2022)

work page 2022
[47]

He and C.-C

Y. He and C.-C. Chien, Vortex structure and spectrum of an atomic fermi superﬂuid in a spherical bubble trap, Phys. Rev. A 108, 053303 (2023)

work page 2023
[48]

He and C.-C

Y. He and C.-C. Chien, Two-component atomic fermi su- perﬂuid with spin-orbital coupling in thin-spherical-she ll geometry, Phys. Rev. A 111, 053309 (2025)

work page 2025
[49]

He and C.-C

Y. He and C.-C. Chien, Two-component repulsive atomic fermi gases in a thin spherical shell, Phys. Rev. A 110, 063308 (2024)

work page 2024
[50]

de Gennes, Superconductivity of Metals and Alloys (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1999)

P.-G. de Gennes, Superconductivity of Metals and Alloys (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1999)

work page 1999
[51]

Zhu, Bogoliubov-de Gennes Method and Its Ap- plications, 1st ed., Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol

J.-X. Zhu, Bogoliubov-de Gennes Method and Its Ap- plications, 1st ed., Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 924 (Springer (Cham), 2016)

work page 2016
[52]

Kim, C.-C

T. Kim, C.-C. Chien, and S.-Z. Lin, Reentrant fulde- ferrell-larkin-ovchinnikov state in small-sized superco n- ductors, Phys. Rev. B 99, 054509 (2019)

work page 2019
[53]

A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka, Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems (McGraw-Hill, Boston, 1971)

work page 1971
[54]

Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity , 2nd ed

M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity , 2nd ed. (Dover publications, Garden City, NY, 2004)

work page 2004
[55]

A. M. Clogston, Upper limit for the critical ﬁeld in hard superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 266 (1962)

work page 1962
[56]

B. S. Chandrasekhar, A note on the maximum critical ﬁeld of high-ﬁeld superconductors, Applied Physics Let- ters 1, 7 (1962)

work page 1962
[57]

Chien, Q

C.-C. Chien, Q. Chen, Y. He, and K. Levin, Superﬂuid phase diagrams of trapped fermi gases with population imbalance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 110404 (2007)

work page 2007
[58]

M. M. Parish, F. M. Marchetti, A. Lamacraft, and B. D. Simons, Finite-temperature phase diagram of a polarized fermi condensate, Nature Physics 3, 124 (2007)

work page 2007
[59]

Dobrzyniecki, G

J. Dobrzyniecki, G. Orso, and T. Sowi´ nski, Unconven- tional pairing in few-fermion systems tuned by external conﬁnement, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043105 (2021)

work page 2021
[60]

M. W. Zwierlein, C. H. Schunck, A. Schirotzek, and W. Ketterle, Fermionic superﬂuidity with imbalanced spin populations, Science 311, 492 (2006)

work page 2006
[61]

G. B. Partridge, W. Li, R. I. Kamar, Y.-a. Liao, and R. G. Hulet, Pairing and phase separation in a polarized fermi gas, Science 311, 503–505 (2006)

work page 2006
[62]

Martinez-Dorantes, W

M. Martinez-Dorantes, W. Alt, J. Gallego, S. Ghosh, L. Ratschbacher, and D. Meschede, State-dependent ﬂu- orescence of neutral atoms in optical potentials, Phys. Rev. A 97, 023410 (2018). 10

work page 2018
[63]

D. V. Sheludko, S. C. Bell, R. Anderson, C. S. Hofmann, E. J. D. Vredenbregt, and R. E. Scholten, State-selective imaging of cold atoms, Phys. Rev. A 77, 033401 (2008)

work page 2008
[64]

Y. Shin, C. H. Schunck, A. Schirotzek, and W. Ketterle, Tomographic rf spectroscopy of a trapped fermi gas at unitarity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 090403 (2007)

work page 2007
[65]

P. A. Murthy, M. Neidig, R. Klemt, L. Bayha, I. Boettcher, T. Enss, M. Holten, G. Z¨ urn, P. M. Preiss, and S. Jochim, High- temperature pairing in a strongly interacting two- dimensional Fermi gas, Science 359, 452 (2018), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aan5950

work page doi:10.1126/science.aan5950 2018
[66]

V. L. Berezinskii, Destruction of long-range order in o ne- dimensional and two-dimensional systems having a con- tinuous symmetry group i. classical systems, Sov. Phys. JETP 32, 493 (1971)

work page 1971
[67]

V. L. Berezinskii, Destruction of long-range order in o ne- dimensional and two-dimensional systems having a con- tinuous symmetry group ii. quantum systems, Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 610 (1972)

work page 1972
[68]

J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, metasta- bility and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems, J. Phys. C 6, 1181 (1973)

work page 1973
[69]

L. He, H. Lu, G. Cao, H. Hu, , and X.-J. Liu, Quantum ﬂuctuations in the bcs-bec crossover of two-dimensional fermi gases, Phys. Rev. A 92, 023620 (2015)

work page 2015
[70]

C.-T. Wu, B. M. Anderson, R. Boyack, and K. Levin, Quasicondensation in two-dimensional fermi gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 240401 (2015)

work page 2015
[71]

Boettcher, L

I. Boettcher, L. Bayha, D. Kedar, P. A. Murthy, M. Nei- dig, M. G. Ries, A. N. Wenz, G. Zurn, S. Jochim, and T. Enss, Equation of state of ultracold fermions in the 2d bec-bcs crossover region, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 045303 (2016)

work page 2016