pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15623 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-15 · ⚛️ nucl-th · nucl-ex

Microscopic derivation of the interacting boson model parameters with machine learning

Y. Obata , K. Nomura This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 19:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th nucl-ex
keywords interacting boson modelmachine learningnuclear density functional theoryrare-earth nucleinuclear collectivityparameter derivationquadrupole deformation
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

A neural network maps microscopic potential energy landscapes to interacting boson model parameters for nuclei.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies machine learning to derive parameters for the interacting boson model directly from microscopic calculations. A neural network is trained on potential energy landscapes computed in nuclear density functional theory, using additional inputs for collectivity and nucleon numbers to resolve ambiguities. This approach is tested on rare-earth nuclei and produces parameters and spectra that track how nuclear structure changes across the region. It eliminates the need for manual adjustment of parameters while still matching the underlying microscopic energy surfaces. A sympathetic reader would care because it provides a systematic, automated way to connect microscopic nuclear models to collective descriptions used in spectroscopy.

Core claim

By training a physics-guided neural network to map potential energy landscapes from density functional theory onto the space of interacting boson model parameters, incorporating a quadrupole collectivity indicator and valence nucleon numbers, the method yields a set of parameters and resulting energy spectra for rare-earth nuclei that reproduce the microscopic landscapes and reflect the evolution of nuclear structure without any manual parameter tuning.

What carries the argument

The physics-guided neural network that takes potential energy landscapes, a global quadrupole collectivity indicator, and valence nucleon numbers as inputs to output interacting boson model parameters.

If this is right

  • Parameters and spectra are obtained automatically without manual tuning for each nucleus.
  • The derived parameters reflect the nuclear structural evolution across the rare-earth region.
  • This provides a robust alternative microscopic description of nuclear collectivity.
  • Energy spectra from the boson model match features of the microscopic calculations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If successful, this method could be extended to other mass regions to test universality of the mapping.
  • It suggests that energy landscapes encode enough information to fix collective model parameters uniquely when supplemented with global indicators.
  • Future work might use the network to predict spectra for nuclei where experimental data is sparse.

Load-bearing premise

The combination of potential energy landscapes from density functional theory with a quadrupole collectivity indicator and valence nucleon numbers supplies enough information to uniquely determine the interacting boson model parameters.

What would settle it

A direct comparison showing that the energy spectra or parameters from the network deviate significantly from those obtained by traditional fitting methods or from experimental data for the same rare-earth nuclei would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15623 by K. Nomura, Y. Obata.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic illustration of the physics-informed branching architec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Training and validation loss histories under optimal hyperparameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Potential energy curves (PECs) along the axial quadrupole deforma [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Derived IBM-2 parameters for Nd, Sm, and Gd isotopes as func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Machine learning is applied to derive microscopically parameters of the interacting boson model for nuclear spectroscopy. A physics-guided neural network is proposed, which is trained to map the potential energy landscapes that are calculated within the nuclear density functional theory onto the bosonic parameter space. To incorporate the underlying nuclear structure information and mitigate parameter degeneracy, the network integrates a global quadrupole collectivity indicator and valence nucleon numbers as key input features. In its applications to rare-earth nuclei, by reproducing the microscopic energy landscapes without any manual parameter tuning, the trained network is shown to provide a set of the model parameters and energy spectra that reflect the nuclear structural evolution, offering a robust alternative microscopic description of nuclear collectivity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper applies a physics-guided neural network to map potential energy surfaces computed in nuclear density functional theory, augmented by a global quadrupole collectivity indicator and valence nucleon numbers, onto the parameter space of the interacting boson model (IBM). For rare-earth nuclei the trained network is reported to reproduce the input microscopic landscapes without manual tuning and to yield IBM parameters and spectra that track nuclear shape evolution, thereby supplying a microscopic route to IBM spectroscopy.

Significance. A validated, degeneracy-controlled mapping from DFT landscapes to IBM parameters would furnish a systematic, largely parameter-free bridge between microscopic calculations and algebraic models, enabling spectroscopic predictions across isotopic chains where direct IBM fitting is ambiguous. The explicit inclusion of collectivity and valence features is a constructive attempt to embed nuclear-structure priors into the ML pipeline.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the network reproduces microscopic energy landscapes 'without any manual parameter tuning' and supplies a 'robust alternative microscopic description' rests on the assertion that the added quadrupole indicator and valence numbers resolve IBM parameter degeneracies. No quantitative validation metrics, error bars, baseline comparisons, or cross-validation details are supplied to demonstrate that the learned mapping is unique rather than merely consistent with the training data.
  2. [Network architecture and training] The section describing the network architecture and loss function: while the abstract states that the extra features 'mitigate parameter degeneracy,' the manuscript provides no concrete test (e.g., recovery of known degenerate IBM parameter sets, analysis of the output distribution for fixed inputs, or comparison of coherent-state PES residuals across multiple solutions) showing that the training objective actually enforces uniqueness rather than permitting multiple IBM Hamiltonians that reproduce the same input landscape.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Introduction] The notation used for the IBM Hamiltonian parameters and the precise definition of the global quadrupole collectivity indicator should be stated explicitly in the introduction or methods to allow readers to reproduce the input feature construction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and the recognition of the potential impact of our work. Below we provide point-by-point responses to the major comments and describe the changes we will implement in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the network reproduces microscopic energy landscapes 'without any manual parameter tuning' and supplies a 'robust alternative microscopic description' rests on the assertion that the added quadrupole indicator and valence numbers resolve IBM parameter degeneracies. No quantitative validation metrics, error bars, baseline comparisons, or cross-validation details are supplied to demonstrate that the learned mapping is unique rather than merely consistent with the training data.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract advances strong claims about uniqueness and the absence of manual tuning. The manuscript demonstrates the mapping through direct reproduction of DFT landscapes and the resulting spectra that follow the known shape evolution across rare-earth chains. To address the lack of quantitative support for uniqueness, we will add in revision explicit metrics including root-mean-square deviations between input and reproduced potential energy surfaces, standard deviations across multiple training runs, and a baseline comparison against a network trained without the collectivity and valence features. A description of the training/validation split and any cross-validation procedure will also be included. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Network architecture and training] The section describing the network architecture and loss function: while the abstract states that the extra features 'mitigate parameter degeneracy,' the manuscript provides no concrete test (e.g., recovery of known degenerate IBM parameter sets, analysis of the output distribution for fixed inputs, or comparison of coherent-state PES residuals across multiple solutions) showing that the training objective actually enforces uniqueness rather than permitting multiple IBM Hamiltonians that reproduce the same input landscape.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies that the current text does not contain explicit numerical tests for uniqueness. The additional input features are introduced on the basis of established nuclear-structure considerations to reduce the well-known degeneracies in IBM fits. The results for the isotopic chains show stable, physically interpretable parameters. In the revision we will add an analysis of the spread in predicted parameters for repeated forward passes on identical inputs and, where alternative solutions exist, a comparison of the corresponding coherent-state PES residuals. These additions will be placed in the network-architecture section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Network trained to reproduce DFT PES yields IBM parameters by construction of the learning objective

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "A physics-guided neural network is proposed, which is trained to map the potential energy landscapes that are calculated within the nuclear density functional theory onto the bosonic parameter space. ... by reproducing the microscopic energy landscapes without any manual parameter tuning, the trained network is shown to provide a set of the model parameters and energy spectra that reflect the nuclear structural evolution"

    The network's training objective is to produce IBM parameters whose coherent-state PES matches the supplied DFT landscapes. Consequently, the 'reproduction' and the derived parameters are achieved by construction of the supervised mapping rather than by an independent microscopic derivation from first principles.

full rationale

The derivation chain consists of training a physics-guided NN to map DFT potential energy surfaces (plus quadrupole indicator and valence numbers) onto IBM parameters, then showing that the resulting IBM coherent-state PES reproduces the microscopic input. This reproduction is the explicit training target, so the output parameters are a learned fit rather than an independent first-principles extraction. The added input features are intended to resolve degeneracy, but the central claim still reduces to supervised matching of the supplied landscapes. No self-citation load-bearing or ansatz smuggling is present; the process is data-driven fitting with physical guidance. This produces moderate circularity (score 4) without fully collapsing the result to tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions from nuclear density functional theory and the interacting boson model framework, with the neural network serving as a learned mapping rather than introducing new physical entities or free parameters beyond training.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Nuclear density functional theory calculations yield reliable potential energy landscapes that encode the essential collective degrees of freedom for rare-earth nuclei.
    The mapping procedure takes these landscapes as direct inputs without questioning their accuracy.
  • domain assumption Adding a global quadrupole collectivity indicator and valence nucleon numbers resolves parameter degeneracy in the boson model space.
    This is invoked to justify the network architecture and input features.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5637 in / 1402 out tokens · 42628 ms · 2026-05-19T19:43:36.696583+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. Bohr, B. R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure, V ol. II, Ben- jamin, New York, USA, 1975

    work page 1975

  2. [2]

    P. Ring, P. Schuck, The Nuclear Many-Body Problem, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980

    work page 1980

  3. [3]

    Cejnar, J

    P. Cejnar, J. Jolie, R. F. Casten, Quantum phase transitions in the shapes of atomic nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 2155–2212.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2155

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.2155 2010

  4. [4]

    Iachello, Quantum phase transitions in algebraic models, Revista Nuovo Cimento 34 (2011) 617

    F. Iachello, Quantum phase transitions in algebraic models, Revista Nuovo Cimento 34 (2011) 617. doi:10.1393/ncr/i2011-10070-7. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1393/ncr/ i2011-10070-7

    work page doi:10.1393/ncr/i2011-10070-7 2011

  5. [5]

    Fortunato, Quantum phase transitions in algebraic and collective models of nuclear structure, Prog

    L. Fortunato, Quantum phase transitions in algebraic and collective models of nuclear structure, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 121 (2021) 103891.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103891. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0146641021000508

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103891 2021

  6. [6]

    J. L. Wood, K. Heyde, W. Nazarewicz, M. Huyse, P. van Duppen, Coexistence in even-mass nuclei, Phys. Rep. 215 (3-4) (1992) 101 – 201.doi:10.1016/ 0370-1573(92)90095-H

    work page 1992

  7. [7]

    Heyde, J

    K. Heyde, J. L. Wood, Shape coexistence in atomic nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 (2011) 1467–1521. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1467. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ RevModPhys.83.1467

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.1467 2011

  8. [8]

    P. E. Garrett, M. Zieli ´nska, E. Clément, An exper- imental view on shape coexistence in nuclei, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 124 (2022) 103931.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103931. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0146641021000922

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103931 2022

  9. [9]

    Leoni, B

    S. Leoni, B. Fornal, A. Bracco, Y . Tsunoda, T. Otsuka, Multifaceted character of shape coex- istence phenomena in atomic nuclei, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 139 (2024) 104119.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2024.104119. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0146641024000231

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2024.104119 2024

  10. [10]

    Iachello, A

    F. Iachello, A. Arima, The interacting boson model, Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987

    work page 1987

  11. [11]

    Otsuka, A

    T. Otsuka, A. Arima, F. Iachello, I. Talmi, Shell model de- scription of interacting bosons, Phys. Lett. B 76 (2) (1978) 139 – 143.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90260-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90260-5 1978

  12. [12]

    Otsuka, A

    T. Otsuka, A. Arima, F. Iachello, Nuclear shell model and interacting bosons, Nucl. Phys. A 309 (1–2) (1978) 1.doi:10.1016/0375-9474(78)90532-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(78)90532-8 1978

  13. [13]

    Otsuka, Microscopic basis and introduction to ibm- 2, in: Algebraic Approaches to Nuclear Structure, CRC Press, 2020, pp

    T. Otsuka, Microscopic basis and introduction to ibm- 2, in: Algebraic Approaches to Nuclear Structure, CRC Press, 2020, pp. 195–249

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Mizusaki, T

    T. Mizusaki, T. Otsuka, Microscopic calculations foro(6) nuclei by the interacting boson model, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 125 (1996) 97–150.doi:10.1143/PTPS.125. 97. 6

    work page doi:10.1143/ptps.125 1996

  15. [15]

    Nomura, N

    K. Nomura, N. Shimizu, T. Otsuka, Mean-field deriva- tion of the interacting boson model hamiltonian and ex- otic nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 142501.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.142501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.142501 2008

  16. [16]

    Nomura, N

    K. Nomura, N. Shimizu, T. Otsuka, Formulating the in- teracting boson model by mean-field methods, Phys. Rev. C 81 (2010) 044307.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.81. 044307

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.81 2010

  17. [17]

    Nomura, T

    K. Nomura, T. Otsuka, N. Shimizu, L. Guo, Microscopic formulation of the interacting boson model for rotational nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 83 (2011) 041302.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.83.041302

    work page 2011

  18. [18]

    Nomura, N

    K. Nomura, N. Shimizu, D. Vretenar, T. Nikši ´c, T. Ot- suka, Robust regularity inγ-soft nuclei and its micro- scopic realization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 132501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.132501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.132501 2012

  19. [19]

    Bender, P.-H

    M. Bender, P.-H. Heenen, P.-G. Reinhard, Self-consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 121.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.121

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.121 2003

  20. [20]

    Vretenar, A

    D. Vretenar, A. V . Afanasjev, G. A. Lalazissis, P. Ring, Relativistic hartree-bogoliubov theory: static and dy- namic aspects of exotic nuclear structure, Phys. Rep. 409 (2005) 101.doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.10.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.10.001 2005

  21. [21]

    L. M. Robledo, T. R. Rodríguez, R. R. Rodríguez- Guzmán, Mean field and beyond description of nuclear structure with the gogny force: a review, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 46 (1) (2019) 013001. URLhttp://stacks.iop.org/0954-3899/46/i=1/ a=013001

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    Nomura, Mapped interacting boson model for nuclear structure studies, Eur

    K. Nomura, Mapped interacting boson model for nuclear structure studies, Eur. Phys. J. A 61 (6) (2025) 139. doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01604-7. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1140/epja/ s10050-025-01604-7

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01604-7 2025

  23. [23]

    Boehnlein, M

    A. Boehnlein, M. Diefenthaler, N. Sato, M. Schram, V . Ziegler, C. Fanelli, M. Hjorth-Jensen, T. Horn, M. P. Kuchera, D. Lee, W. Nazarewicz, P. Ostroumov, K. Orginos, A. Poon, X.-N. Wang, A. Scheinker, M. S. Smith, L.-G. Pang, Colloquium: Machine learning in nuclear physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 (2022) 031003. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.94.031003. URLhttps://li...

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.031003 2022

  24. [24]

    Akkoyun, T

    S. Akkoyun, T. Bayram, S. O. Kara, N. Yildiz, Consistent empirical physical formulas for potential energy curves of 38–66ti isotopes by using neural net- works, Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 10 (6) (2013) 528–534. doi:10.1134/S1547477113060022. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1134/ S1547477113060022

    work page doi:10.1134/s1547477113060022 2013

  25. [25]

    Lasseri, D

    R.-D. Lasseri, D. Regnier, J.-P. Ebran, A. Penon, Taming nuclear complexity with a committee of multilayer neural networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 162502. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.162502. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.124.162502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.162502 2020

  26. [26]

    D. Lay, E. Flynn, S. A. Giuliani, W. Nazarewicz, L. Neufcourt, Neural network emulation of spon- taneous fission, Phys. Rev. C 109 (2024) 044305. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.109.044305. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.109.044305

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.109.044305 2024

  27. [27]

    B. F. Lv, Y . Wang, Z. Li, C. M. Petrache, Machine learn- ing for decoding spin-zero and octupole excitations, Phys. Rev. C 111 (2025) 064324.doi:10.1103/vjwy-m9xv. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ vjwy-m9xv

    work page doi:10.1103/vjwy-m9xv 2025

  28. [28]

    Improving students’ help-seeking skills using metacognitive feedback in an intelli- gent tutoring system

    M. Ahmad, A. Bindra, Nuclear structure of medium and heavy mass nuclei: From collectivity trends to machine learning approaches, Nucl. Phys. A 1067 (2026) 123288.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j. nuclphysa.2025.123288

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2026

  29. [29]

    Zhang, L

    X. Zhang, L. Fortunato, Prediction of $$2ˆ{+}$$energies in even–even nuclei of the terra incognita with bayesian neural network, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 141 (2) (2026) 121. doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-026-07362-9. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/ s13360-026-07362-9

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-026-07362-9 2026

  30. [30]

    Z. L. Li, B. F. Lv, Y . J. Wang, C. M. Petrache, Study of yrast and yrare low-lying excited states using machine learning approaches, Chin. Phys. C 50 (1) (2026) 014107. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/adfe54. URLhttps://hepnp.ihep.ac.cn/en/article/ doi/10.1088/1674-1137/adfe54

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/adfe54 2026

  31. [31]

    G. Ke, Q. Meng, T. Finley, T. Wang, W. Chen, W. Ma, Q. Ye, T.-Y . Liu, Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree, in: I. Guyon, U. V . Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, V ol. 30, Curran Associates, Inc., 2017. URLhttps://proceedings.neurips. ...

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Raissi, P

    M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, G. E. Karniadakis, Physics- informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys. 378 (2019) 686–707.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 2019

  33. [33]

    Iachello, Analytic description of critical point nuclei in a spherical-axially deformed shape phase transition, 7 Phys

    F. Iachello, Analytic description of critical point nuclei in a spherical-axially deformed shape phase transition, 7 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 052502.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.87.052502

    work page 2001

  34. [34]

    R. F. Casten, N. V . Zamfir, Empirical realiza- tion of a critical point description in atomic nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 052503. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.052503. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.87.052503

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.052503 2001

  35. [35]

    J. F. Berger, M. Girod, D. Gogny, Microscopic analysis of collective dynamics in low energy fission, Nucl. Phys. A 428 (0) (1984) 23 – 36.doi:10.1016/0375-9474(84) 90240-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(84 1984

  36. [36]

    Decharge and M

    J. Decharge and M. Girod and D. Gogny, Self consis- tent calculations and quadrupole moments of even sm iso- topes, Phys. Lett. B 55 (4) (1975) 361.doi:10.1016/ 0370-2693(75)90359-7

    work page 1975

  37. [37]

    Hilaire, M

    S. Hilaire, M. Girod, Large-scale mean-field calcula- tions from proton to neutron drip lines using the d1s gogny force, Eur. Phys. J. A 33 (2) (2007) 237–241. doi:10.1140/epja/i2007-10450-2. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1140/epja/ i2007-10450-2

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2007-10450-2 2007

  38. [38]

    fr/science_en_ligne/carte_potentiels_ microscopiques/carte_potentiel_nucleaire_ eng.htm

    AMEDEE database,https://www-phynu.cea. fr/science_en_ligne/carte_potentiels_ microscopiques/carte_potentiel_nucleaire_ eng.htm

    work page

  39. [39]

    A. E. L. Dieperink, O. Scholten, F. Iachello, Classical limit of the interacting-boson model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 1747–1750.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.1747. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.44.1747

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.44.1747 1980

  40. [40]

    J. N. Ginocchio, M. W. Kirson, Relationship between the bohr collective hamiltonian and the interacting- boson model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 1744–1747. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.1744. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.44.1744

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.44.1744 1980

  41. [41]

    A. Bohr, B. R. Mottelson, Features of nuclear deforma- tions produced by the alignment of individual particles or pairs, Phys. Scr. 22 (5) (1980) 468–474.doi:10.1088/ 0031-8949/22/5/008

    work page 1980

  42. [42]

    J. N. Ginocchio, M. W. Kirson, An intrinsic state for the interacting boson model and its relationship to the bohr- mottelson model, Nucl. Phys. A 350 (1980) 31.doi:10. 1016/0375-9474(80)90387-5

    work page 1980

  43. [43]

    R. F. Casten, D. S. Brenner, P. E. Haustein, Valence p-n interactions and the development of collectivity in heavy nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 (1987) 658–661. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.658. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.58.658

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.58.658 1987

  44. [44]

    B. Lv, Z. Li, Y . Wang, C. Petrache, Mapping low-lying states and b(e2;01+→21+) in even-even nuclei with machine learning, Phys. Lett. B 857 (2024) 139013. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb. 2024.139013. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0370269324005719

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb 2024

  45. [45]

    Scholten, The interacting boson approximation model and applications, Ph.D

    O. Scholten, The interacting boson approximation model and applications, Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen (1980)

    work page 1980

  46. [46]

    Scholten, Microscopic calculations for the interacting boson model, Phys

    O. Scholten, Microscopic calculations for the interacting boson model, Phys. Rev. C 28 (1983) 1783–1790. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.28.1783. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.28.1783

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.28.1783 1983

  47. [47]

    Akiba, S

    T. Akiba, S. Sano, T. Yanase, T. Ohta, M. Koyama, Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework, in: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2019, pp. 2623–2631

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    Otsuka, N

    T. Otsuka, N. Yoshida, JAERI-M (Japan At. Ener. Res. Inst.) Report No. 85 (1985)

    work page 1985

  49. [49]

    Otsuka, Boson model of medium-heavy nuclei, Ph.D

    T. Otsuka, Boson model of medium-heavy nuclei, Ph.D. thesis, University of Tokyo (1979)

    work page 1979

  50. [50]

    Otsuka, Rotational states and interacting bosons, Nucl

    T. Otsuka, Rotational states and interacting bosons, Nucl. Phys. A 368 (2) (1981) 244–284.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(81)90685-0. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/0375947481906850

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(81)90685-0 1981

  51. [51]

    Schaaser, D

    H. Schaaser, D. M. Brink, The moment of inertia in the interacting boson model, Nucl. Phys. A 452 (1) (1986) 1 – 29.doi:10.1016/0375-9474(86)90505-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(86)90505-1 1986

  52. [52]

    D. J. Thouless, J. G. Valatin, Time-dependent hartree- fock equations and rotational states of nuclei, Nucl. Phys. 31 (0) (1962) 211 – 230.doi:10.1016/0029-5582(62) 90741-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0029-5582(62 1962

  53. [53]

    National Nuclear Data Center (NNDC), Nudat 3 database, https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat3/

    work page

  54. [54]

    Tsunoda, N

    Y . Tsunoda, N. Shimizu, T. Otsuka, Shape transition of nd and sm isotopes and the neutrinoless double-β-decay nuclear matrix element of 150Nd, Phys. Rev. C 108 (2023) L021302.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.108.L021302. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.108.L021302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.108.l021302 2023

  55. [55]

    Nomura, Configuration mixing effects on neutrinolessββ-decay nuclear matrix elements, Phys

    K. Nomura, Configuration mixing effects on neutrinolessββ-decay nuclear matrix elements, Phys. Lett. B 871 (2025) 139995.doi:https: 8 //doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139995. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0370269325007531 9

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139995 2025