pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17409 · v1 · pith:YLQFTEO3new · submitted 2026-05-17 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph

Chemical Interpretation of Time-Dependent Coupled-Cluster Theory

Aparna Krishnan , H{\aa}kon Emil Kristiansen , Benjamin G. Peyton , T. Daniel Crawford , Thomas Bondo Pedersen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 22:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph
keywords time-dependent coupled-clusterconfiguration weightsSlater determinantsabsorption spectraorbital transitionsvalence excitationscore excitationsdipole moment decomposition
0
0 comments X

The pith

Time-dependent coupled-cluster theory gains chemical interpretation through expansion of its wavefunctions in a Slater-determinant basis to produce time-dependent configuration weights.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a method to interpret the results of time-dependent coupled-cluster simulations in terms of familiar orbital transitions. It expands the left and right coupled-cluster functions in the Slater-determinant basis, creating time-dependent configuration weights that track how much each determinant contributes as the system evolves. These weights are then used to break down the time-dependent electric dipole moment and autocorrelation function, turning abstract dynamics into assignments of specific absorption peaks to orbital excitations. The approach is shown to work for linear absorption spectra of small molecules and extends to core excitations and certain nonlinear processes. A sympathetic reader would care because it bridges the accuracy of time-dependent simulations with the chemical intuition available in static excited-state methods.

Core claim

At the time-dependent coupled-cluster singles-and-doubles level the left and right wavefunctions are expanded in the full Slater-determinant basis to obtain time-dependent configuration weights. These weights decompose the electric-dipole moment and autocorrelation function, allowing each feature in a linear absorption spectrum to be assigned to a dominant orbital transition. The resulting assignments for valence lines in HF, H2O, NH3, and CH4 match those obtained from equation-of-motion coupled-cluster singles-and-doubles theory, and the same procedure is applied to core-level excitations and to time-resolved processes such as impulsive x-ray Raman scattering in neon and pump-probe spectra.

What carries the argument

Time-dependent configuration weights obtained by expanding the left and right coupled-cluster functions in the Slater-determinant basis, which quantify the instantaneous contribution of each determinant and enable decomposition of dipole and autocorrelation signals.

If this is right

  • Valence absorption lines in HF, H2O, NH3, and CH4 receive explicit orbital-transition labels that agree with equation-of-motion coupled-cluster results.
  • Core-level excitations in HF, H2O, and NH3 can be assigned by the same decomposition of the dipole moment.
  • Population dynamics during impulsive stimulated x-ray Raman scattering in the neon atom become directly visible through the time evolution of the weights.
  • Transient pump-probe spectra of HF can be interpreted by tracking how individual determinants contribute at each delay time.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same determinant expansion could be applied to time-dependent simulations that include higher-order excitations to check whether the assignments remain stable.
  • Direct comparison of these weights with frequency-domain response functions might reveal how time-domain truncation errors translate into spectral features.
  • The method offers a route to interpret dynamics in systems where static excited-state methods become computationally expensive.

Load-bearing premise

The configuration weights derived from the determinant expansion correspond to the actual dominant orbital-excitation character of the dynamics rather than being an artifact of the chosen reference determinant or the truncation level.

What would settle it

If the orbital-transition assignments produced by the time-dependent configuration weights differ systematically from the assignments obtained by equation-of-motion coupled-cluster singles-and-doubles theory on the same four ten-electron molecules, the chemical interpretation would be shown to be unreliable.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17409 by Aparna Krishnan, Benjamin G. Peyton, H{\aa}kon Emil Kristiansen, T. Daniel Crawford, Thomas Bondo Pedersen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Valence spectrum comparison of HF under ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Valence spectrum comparison of H2O under (a) x-polarized, (b) y-polarized, and (c) z-polarized perturbations at 0.01 a.u. field strength. Each panel shows dipole decomposition (top) and ACF singles decomposition (bottom). EOM-CCSD reference energies are indicated by red vertical dotted lines. 20 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Valence spectrum comparison of NH3 with (a) x-polarized, (b) y-polarized, and (c) z-polarized perturbations at 0.01 a.u. field strength. Top panels show dipole decompo￾sition, bottom panels show ACF singles decomposition. EOM-CCSD reference energies are indicated by red vertical dotted lines. 22 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: ACF singles decomposition of valence spectrum of NH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Full spectral comparison of CH4 under (a) x-polarized, (b) y-polarized, and (c) z-polarized perturbations at 0.01 a.u. field strength. Each panel shows dipole decomposition (top) and ACF singles decomposition (bottom). EOM-CCSD reference energies are indicated by red vertical lines. 27 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: ACF singles decomposition of valence spectrum of CH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Core spectral-region comparison of HF, H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Laser pulse used to drive the ISXRS process in Ne. Left: Electric-field amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Time evolution of the CCSD reference, singles, and doubles configuration weights [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Time evolution of key CCSD configuration weights involved in an ISXRS process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Field-free coupling of the HF ground-state determinant and the dipole-forbidden [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Optical pump – X-ray probe transient absorption spectrum of HF, computed from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Total TD-CCSD weight of the single-excited determinants in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Total TD-CCSD weight of the single-excited determinants in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: TD-CCSD weight of the core-excited determinant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: TD-CCSD weight of the valence-excited determinant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

While providing a highly accurate framework for simulating laser-induced many-electron dynamics in atom and molecules, including linear and nonlinear steady-state and transient absorption spectra, time-dependent coupled-cluster theory does not offer a straightforward interpretation in chemical terms. This should be contrasted with conventional time-independent equation-of-motion coupled-cluster or frequency-dependent response models where a simple eigenvector analysis readily reveals the dominant orbital-excitation character of individual excited states. We fill this gap by expanding the left and right coupled-cluster functions in Slater-determinant basis, thus allowing for a time-dependent generalization of configuration weights that can be used to track populations throughout a simulation. The same expansions are used to decompose the time-dependent electric-dipole moment and autocorrelation function, providing a computationally straightforward approach to the assignment of absorption peaks to orbital transitions for single-reference systems. At the time-dependent coupled-cluster singles-and-doubles level of theory, we demonstrate the power of the proposed methodology by assigning valence lines in the linear absorption spectra of four ten-electron molecules (HF, H2O, NH3, and CH4) with different point-group symmetries, validating the assignment by comparison with equation-of-motion coupled-cluster singles-and-doubles theory. In addition, core-level excitations are assigned for HF, H2O, and NH3. Finally, the usefulness of time-dependent configuration weights is illustrated by applications to an impulsive stimulated x-ray Raman scattering process in the Ne atom and to a transient pump-probe spectrum of the HF molecule.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a chemical interpretation for time-dependent coupled-cluster (TD-CC) theory by expanding the left and right CC vectors in the Slater-determinant basis. This yields time-dependent configuration weights that are used to decompose the time-dependent dipole moment and autocorrelation function, enabling assignment of absorption peaks to specific orbital transitions. The method is demonstrated at the CCSD level for valence-line assignments in HF, H2O, NH3, and CH4 (validated against EOM-CCSD), core excitations in three of those molecules, and applications to impulsive stimulated x-ray Raman scattering in Ne and a transient pump-probe spectrum of HF.

Significance. If the configuration weights prove robust against truncation artifacts, the approach would supply a practical, post-processing route to orbital-level insight in TD-CC simulations of laser-driven dynamics. This would complement the high accuracy of TD-CC for spectra and transients while addressing the interpretability gap relative to EOM-CC or response theory, with direct relevance to attosecond and nonlinear spectroscopies.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.1] §4.1 (valence assignments): The validation consists of a qualitative statement that the TD-CCSD assignments match EOM-CCSD; no quantitative metrics (e.g., overlap of dominant configurations, percentage agreement across the four molecules, or energy deviations) are supplied. Because the central demonstration rests on this comparison, the absence of such numbers leaves the strength of the agreement unassessed.
  2. [§4.2] §4.2 (core excitations): Both the TD-CCSD weights and the EOM-CCSD reference employ the identical HF reference and CCSD truncation. For core states, where single-reference and truncation errors are known to be larger, this shared bias could produce matching but spurious orbital assignments; an explicit test against a higher-level method or experimental peak positions is needed to substantiate the claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Theory section] The definition of the time-dependent weights (Eq. (X) in the theory section) should explicitly state the normalization convention used for the left and right vectors to avoid ambiguity when comparing populations across time steps.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions for the decomposed spectra should indicate the threshold used to label a configuration as 'dominant' so that readers can reproduce the assignments.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their supportive summary and recommendation of minor revision. We respond point by point to the major comments below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.1] §4.1 (valence assignments): The validation consists of a qualitative statement that the TD-CCSD assignments match EOM-CCSD; no quantitative metrics (e.g., overlap of dominant configurations, percentage agreement across the four molecules, or energy deviations) are supplied. Because the central demonstration rests on this comparison, the absence of such numbers leaves the strength of the agreement unassessed.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative metrics would provide a clearer assessment of the agreement. In the revised manuscript we will add a table (or supplementary material) reporting, for each valence peak in HF, H2O, NH3, and CH4, the dominant configurations and their weights from both TD-CCSD and EOM-CCSD, the percentage of matching dominant assignments, and the mean absolute deviation in excitation energies. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (core excitations): Both the TD-CCSD weights and the EOM-CCSD reference employ the identical HF reference and CCSD truncation. For core states, where single-reference and truncation errors are known to be larger, this shared bias could produce matching but spurious orbital assignments; an explicit test against a higher-level method or experimental peak positions is needed to substantiate the claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge the risk of shared bias for core excitations. A systematic comparison against CCSDT or higher is computationally prohibitive within the present scope and would require a separate study. However, we will revise the manuscript to include direct comparisons of the assigned TD-CCSD core excitation energies with available experimental values for HF, H2O, and NH3, and we will add an explicit discussion of the limitations of the CCSD truncation for core states. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: time-dependent configuration weights introduced as independent extension with external EOM-CCSD validation

full rationale

The paper introduces an expansion of left and right TD-CC functions in the Slater-determinant basis to generate time-dependent configuration weights, then uses these to decompose the dipole moment and autocorrelation function for spectral assignment. This step is presented as a new methodological proposal rather than a derivation that reduces to prior equations or fitted parameters within the same calculation. Validation proceeds via direct comparison to separate EOM-CCSD calculations on HF, H2O, NH3, and CH4, which operate as an independent benchmark at the same truncation level but do not constitute a self-referential fit or redefinition. No self-definitional loops, fitted inputs relabeled as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the chain; the central claim rests on standard CC machinery plus the proposed expansion, which remains falsifiable against external references.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The method rests on standard coupled-cluster truncation and single-reference assumptions plus the new claim that determinant expansions yield chemically interpretable time-dependent weights. No free parameters are introduced in the abstract; no new particles or forces are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Time-dependent coupled-cluster singles-and-doubles provides a sufficiently accurate description of the valence and core excitations studied.
    Invoked when the authors apply the method at TD-CCSD level and compare to EOM-CCSD.
  • ad hoc to paper The Slater-determinant expansion of the left and right CC vectors produces weights whose time evolution tracks orbital populations without significant truncation artifacts.
    This is the central modeling choice that enables the chemical interpretation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5809 in / 1551 out tokens · 28456 ms · 2026-05-19T22:46:08.444715+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Electronic absorption spectra and geometry of organic molecules: An application of molecular orbital theory ; Academic Press: New York, 1967

    Suzuki, H. Electronic absorption spectra and geometry of organic molecules: An application of molecular orbital theory ; Academic Press: New York, 1967

    work page 1967

  2. [2]

    Molecular Electronic-Structure Theory ; Wiley: Chichester, 2013

    Helgaker, T.; J rgensen, P.; Olsen, J. Molecular Electronic-Structure Theory ; Wiley: Chichester, 2013

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    J.; Waldron, C

    English, N. J.; Waldron, C. J. Perspectives on external electric fields in molecular simulation: progress, prospects and challenges . Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 12407--12440

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    J.; Lestrange, P

    Goings, J. J.; Lestrange, P. J.; Li, X. Real-time time-dependent electronic structure theory . WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2018, 8, e1341

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    The quantum chemistry of attosecond molecular science

    Palacios, A.; Martín, F. The quantum chemistry of attosecond molecular science. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2020, 10, e1430

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    E.; Lopata, K

    Li, X.; Govind, N.; Isborn, C.; DePrince III, A. E.; Lopata, K. Real-Time Time-Dependent Electronic Structure Theory . Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 9951--9993

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Real-time TD-DFT with classical ion dynamics: Methodology and applications

    Kolesov, G.; Grånäs, O.; Hoyt, R.; Vinichenko, D.; Kaxiras, E. Real-time TD-DFT with classical ion dynamics: Methodology and applications . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 466--476

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Hoodbhoy, P.; Negele, J. W. Time-dependent coupled-cluster approximation to nuclear dynamics. II. General formulation . Phys. Rev. C 1979, 19, 1971--1982

    work page 1979

  9. [9]

    Variational principles and linked-cluster exp S expansions for static and dynamic many-body problems

    Arponen, J. Variational principles and linked-cluster exp S expansions for static and dynamic many-body problems . Ann. Phys. 1983, 151, 311--382

    work page 1983

  10. [10]

    B.; Koch, H

    Pedersen, T. B.; Koch, H. On the time-dependent Lagrangian approach in quantum chemistry . J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 5194--5204

    work page 1998

  11. [11]

    Explicitly time-dependent coupled cluster singles doubles calculations of laser-driven many-electron dynamics

    Huber, C.; Klamroth, T. Explicitly time-dependent coupled cluster singles doubles calculations of laser-driven many-electron dynamics . J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 054113

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    Ab initio quantum dynamics using coupled-cluster

    Kvaal, S. Ab initio quantum dynamics using coupled-cluster . J. Chem. Phys. 2012, 136, 194109

    work page 2012

  13. [13]

    R.; DePrince III, A

    Nascimento, D. R.; DePrince III, A. E. Linear absorption spectra from explicitly time-dependent equation-of-motion coupled-cluster theory . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 5834--5840

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Sato, T.; Pathak, H.; Orimo, Y.; Ishikawa, K. L. Time-dependent optimized coupled-cluster method for multielectron dynamics . J. Chem. Phys. 2018, 148, 051101

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    B.; Kvaal, S

    Pedersen, T. B.; Kvaal, S. Symplectic integration and physical interpretation of time-dependent coupled-cluster theory . J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 150, 144106

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    B.; Madsen, N

    Hansen, M. B.; Madsen, N. K.; Zoccante, A.; Christiansen, O. Time-dependent vibrational coupled cluster theory: Theory and implementation at the two-mode coupling level . J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 151, 154116

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    N.; Williams-Young, D

    Koulias, L. N.; Williams-Young, D. B.; Nascimento, D. R.; Deprince, A. E.; Li, X. Relativistic Real-Time Time-Dependent Equation-of-Motion Coupled-Cluster . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 6617--6624

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    S.; Balbi, A.; Koch, H

    Skeidsvoll, A. S.; Balbi, A.; Koch, H. Time-dependent coupled-cluster theory for ultrafast transient-absorption spectroscopy . Phys. Rev. A 2020, 102, 023115

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    G.; Crawford, T

    Wang, Z.; Peyton, B. G.; Crawford, T. D. Accelerating real-time coupled cluster methods with single-precision arithmetic and adaptive numerical integration . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 5479--5491

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    S.; Aurbakken, E.; Sch yen,

    Ofstad, B. S.; Aurbakken, E.; Sch yen, . S.; Kristiansen, H. E.; Kvaal, S.; Pedersen, T. B. Time-dependent coupled-cluster theory . WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2023, 13, e1666

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    R.; Højlund, M

    Kvaal, S.; Fredheim, H. R.; Højlund, M. G.; Pedersen, T. B. Time-Dependent Bivariational Principle: Theoretical Foundation for Real-Time Propagation Methods of Coupled-Cluster Type . J. Phys. Chem. A 2025, 129, 3508--3521

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    E.; Pedersen, T

    Wang, Z.; Kristiansen, H. E.; Pedersen, T. B.; Crawford, T. D. Real-Time Coupled Cluster Theory with Approximate Triples . J. Phys. Chem. A 2025, 129, 1908--1927

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    D.; Kumar, A.; Bazanté, A

    Crawford, T. D.; Kumar, A.; Bazanté, A. P.; Di Remigio, R. Reduced-scaling coupled cluster response theory: Challenges and opportunities . WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2019, 9, e1406

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    G.; Wang, Z.; Crawford, T

    Peyton, B. G.; Wang, Z.; Crawford, T. D. Reduced Scaling Real-Time Coupled Cluster Theory . J. Phys. Chem. A 2023, 127, 8486--8499

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Hauge, E. S. Extrapolating the Electric Dipole Moment . M.Sc.\ thesis, 2021; University of Oslo, https://hdl.handle.net/11250/4170547

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    E.; Konecny, L.; Kadek, M.; Repisky, M.; Pedersen, T

    Hauge, E.; Kristiansen, H. E.; Konecny, L.; Kadek, M.; Repisky, M.; Pedersen, T. B. Cost-Efficient High-Resolution Linear Absorption Spectra through Extrapolating the Dipole Moment from Real-Time Time-Dependent Electronic-Structure Theory . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2023, 19, 7764--7775

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Super-resolution techniques to simulate electronic spectra of large molecular systems

    Kick, M.; Alexander, E.; Beiersdorfer, A.; Van Voorhis, T. Super-resolution techniques to simulate electronic spectra of large molecular systems . Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 8001

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    F.; Bartlett, R

    Stanton, J. F.; Bartlett, R. J. The equation of motion coupled-cluster method. A systematic biorthogonal approach to molecular excitation energies, transition probabilities, and excited state properties . J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 7029--7039

    work page 1993

  29. [29]

    B.; Kristiansen, H

    Pedersen, T. B.; Kristiansen, H. E.; Bodenstein, T.; Kvaal, S.; Sch yen, . S. Interpretation of Coupled-Cluster Many-Electron Dynamics in Terms of Stationary States . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2021, 17, 388--404

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    E.; Kvernmoen, H.; Kvaal, S.; Pedersen, T

    Kristiansen, H. E.; Kvernmoen, H.; Kvaal, S.; Pedersen, T. B. Configuration Weights in Coupled-Cluster Theory . J. Phys. Chem. A 2025, 129, 2638--2654

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    J.; Teale, A

    Wibowo, M.; Irons, T. J.; Teale, A. M. Modeling ultrafast electron dynamics in strong magnetic fields using real-time time-dependent electronic structure methods. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2021, 17, 2137--2165

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    L.; Malkin, V

    Repisky, M.; Konecny, L.; Kadek, M.; Komorovsky, S.; Malkin, O. L.; Malkin, V. G.; Ruud, K. Excitation energies from real-time propagation of the four-component Dirac--Kohn--Sham equation . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 980--991

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Accelerated broadband spectra using transition dipole decomposition and Pad \'e approximants

    Bruner, A.; LaMaster, D.; Lopata, K. Accelerated broadband spectra using transition dipole decomposition and Pad \'e approximants . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 3741--3750

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    Elucidating many-body effects in molecular core spectra through real-time approaches: Efficient classical approximations and a quantum perspective

    Abraham, V.; Senapati, P.; Pathak, H.; Peng, B. Elucidating many-body effects in molecular core spectra through real-time approaches: Efficient classical approximations and a quantum perspective. J. Chem. Phys. 2026, 164

    work page 2026

  35. [35]

    Time-Dependent Schr \"o dinger Equation

    Scrinzi, A. Time-Dependent Schr \"o dinger Equation . Attosecond and XUV Physics: Ultrafast Dynamics and Spectroscopy 2014, 257--292

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    S.; Kristiansen, H

    Aurbakken, E.; Ofstad, B. S.; Kristiansen, H. E.; Schøyen, . S.; Kvaal, S.; Sørensen, L. K.; Lindh, R.; Pedersen, T. B. Transient spectroscopy from time-dependent electronic-structure theory without multipole expansions. Phys. Rev. A 2024, 109, 013109

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Bracewell, R. N. The Fourier Transform . Scientific American 1989, 260, 86--95

    work page 1989

  38. [38]

    Dunning, T. H. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen . J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 1007--1023

    work page 1989

  39. [39]

    D.; Peyton, B

    Crawford, T. D.; Peyton, B. G.; Wang, Z.; Madriaga, J. PyCC---A Python-based coupled cluster implementation. 2026; https://github.com/CrawfordGroup/pycc, (access date: 2026-01-28)

    work page 2026

  40. [40]

    G.; Burns, L

    Smith, D. G.; Burns, L. A.; Simmonett, A. C.; Parrish, R. M.; Schieber, M. C.; Galvelis, R.; Kraus, P.; Kruse, H.; Di Remigio, R.; Alenaizan, A. et al. PSI4 1.4: Open-source software for high-throughput quantum chemistry . J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 152

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    X-ray absorption spectra and core-ionization potentials within a core-valence separated coupled cluster framework

    Coriani, S.; Koch, H. X-ray absorption spectra and core-ionization potentials within a core-valence separated coupled cluster framework . J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 143, 181103

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    S.; Koch, H

    Balbi, A.; Skeidsvoll, A. S.; Koch, H. Coupled Cluster Simulation of Impulsive Stimulated X-ray Raman Scattering . J. Phys. Chem. A 2023, 127, 8676--8684

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Trigonometric pulse envelopes for laser-induced quantum dynamics

    Barth, I.; Lasser, C. Trigonometric pulse envelopes for laser-induced quantum dynamics. J. Phys. B 2009, 42, 235101

    work page 2009

  44. [44]

    Private communication

    Balbi, A.; Koch, H. Private communication. There is a misprint in Ref. balbi_coupled_2023 . The correct value used for in that work is not 0.5\, a.u. but 5\, a.u

    work page

  45. [45]

    A.; Dunning, T

    Kendall, R. A.; Dunning, T. H.; Harrison, R. J. Electron affinities of the first-row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions . J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 96, 6796--7006

    work page 1992

  46. [46]

    E.; Dunning, T

    Woon, D. E.; Dunning, T. H. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. V. Core‐valence basis sets for boron through neon . J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 4572--4585

    work page 1995

  47. [47]

    H.; Kristiansen, H

    Aurbakken, E.; Fredly, K. H.; Kristiansen, H. E.; Kvaal, S.; Myhre, R. H.; Ofstad, B. S.; Pedersen, T. B.; Sch yen, . S.; Sutterud, H.; Winther-Larsen, S. G. HyQD: Hylleraas Quantum Dynamics . 2026; https://github.com/HyQD, (access date: 2026-01-28)

    work page 2026

  48. [48]

    C.; Blunt, N

    Sun, Q.; Berkelbach, T. C.; Blunt, N. S.; Booth, G. H.; Guo, S.; Li, Z.; Liu, J.; McClain, J. D.; Sayfutyarova, E. R.; Sharma, S. et al. PySCF: the Python‐based simulations of chemistry framework . WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2018, 8, e1340

    work page 2018

  49. [49]

    S.; Bogdanov, N

    Sun, Q.; Zhang, X.; Banerjee, S.; Bao, P.; Barbry, M.; Blunt, N. S.; Bogdanov, N. A.; Booth, G. H.; Chen, J.; Cui, Z.-H. et al. Recent developments in the PySCF program package . J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 153, 024109

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    B.; Adamowicz, L

    Kvaal, S.; Lasser, C.; Pedersen, T. B.; Adamowicz, L. No need for a grid: Adaptive fully-flexible gaussians for the time-dependent Schrödinger equation . 2023; arXiv:2207.00271 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    E.; Kristiansen, H

    Schrader, S. E.; Kristiansen, H. E.; Pedersen, T. B.; Kvaal, S. Time evolution as an optimization problem: The hydrogen atom in strong laser fields in a basis of time-dependent Gaussian wave packets . J. Chem. Phys. 2024, 161, 044105

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    P.; Adamowicz, L.; Pedersen, T

    Woźniak, A. P.; Adamowicz, L.; Pedersen, T. B.; Kvaal, S. Gaussians for Electronic and Rovibrational Quantum Dynamics . J. Phys. Chem. A 2024, 128, 3659--3671

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    E.; Pedersen, T

    Schrader, S. E.; Pedersen, T. B.; Kvaal, S. Multidimensional quantum dynamics with explicitly correlated Gaussian wave packets using Rothe’s method . J. Chem. Phys. 2025, 162, 024109

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    P.; Adamowicz, L.; Pedersen, T

    Woźniak, A. P.; Adamowicz, L.; Pedersen, T. B.; Kvaal, S. Rothe Time Propagation for Coupled Electronic and Rovibrational Quantum Dynamics . J. Phys. Chem. A 2025, 129, 5391--5404

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    E.; Kristiansen, H

    Schrader, S. E.; Kristiansen, H. E.; Pedersen, T. B.; Kvaal, S. Time-Dependent Gaussian Basis Sets for Many-Body Systems Using Rothe’s Method: A Mean-Field Study . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2025, 21, 8490--8508

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    J.; Gaarde, M

    Wu, M.; Chen, S.; Camp, S.; Schafer, K. J.; Gaarde, M. B. Theory of strong-field attosecond transient absorption. J. Phys. B 2016, 49, 062003 mcitethebibliography document

    work page 2016