pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17728 · v1 · pith:JKV6N3CAnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 📡 eess.SP

Observation Modeling of Reference--Background Residuals in Single-Snapshot FDA-MIMO-GPR

Yisu Yan , Jifeng Guo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 21:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords reference-background residualFDA-MIMO-GPRdistorted Born approximationTikhonov reconstructioncovariance analysispseudo-anomaly errorssingle-snapshot imagingbackground suppression
0
0 comments X

The pith

Reference-background residuals in single-snapshot FDA-MIMO-GPR produce structured cross-frequency and cross-channel covariance that appears as low-dimensional pseudo-anomaly errors after Tikhonov reconstruction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes an observation model for the reference-background residual that arises when the chosen reference medium differs from the true host background in distorted-Born-approximation-based GPR imaging. It derives the residual response using the Cole-Cole dispersive mapping and reference propagation kernels under the FDA frequency-transmit organization, then constructs the observation-domain covariance and analyzes its off-diagonal structure. Applying a standard Tikhonov estimator shows how this covariance transfers into reconstruction error and covariance over an anomaly candidate region. A reader would care because these effects can masquerade as anomalies or degrade background suppression in practical single-snapshot scenarios. The analysis concludes that the residual should be modeled explicitly for better reference selection and channel-covariance handling.

Core claim

Under the distorted Born approximation, the difference between the reference medium and the physical background medium enters the observations as the reference-background residual. Its response is derived from the Cole-Cole dispersive mapping, the reference propagation kernels, and the FDA frequency-transmit organization. The resulting observation-domain covariance exhibits pronounced cross-frequency and cross-channel structure because multiple transmit-receive channels jointly observe the same residual field. After Tikhonov reconstruction, these structures appear as low-dimensional, concentrated pseudo-anomaly errors over the candidate region.

What carries the argument

The reference--background medium residual, defined as the effective residual between the reference medium and the physical background medium, which is shaped by dispersive mapping and kernels and determines the error structures in reconstruction.

If this is right

  • Right-hand-side coherence arises because multiple channels jointly observe the same residual field.
  • Inter-channel correlation is organized by the FDA space-frequency coding in both observation and reconstruction domains.
  • Explicit modeling of the residual improves reference-state selection and background suppression.
  • The pseudo-anomaly errors remain low-dimensional and concentrated after reconstruction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The structured nature of these errors may allow targeted mitigation strategies like subspace projection in similar array imaging systems.
  • This modeling approach could extend to multi-snapshot cases where temporal variations in background are present.
  • Ignoring the residual might systematically bias anomaly detection thresholds in field deployments of FDA-MIMO-GPR.

Load-bearing premise

The combination of the distorted Born approximation, Cole-Cole dispersive mapping, and reference propagation kernels fully captures the residual response without additional unmodeled propagation effects or higher-order scattering.

What would settle it

Direct comparison of measured reconstruction errors under known reference mismatch against the predicted low-dimensional concentrated pattern; deviation toward higher-dimensional spread would indicate the model is incomplete.

read the original abstract

Reference media are widely used in distorted-Born-approximation-based GPR imaging to represent partially known propagation effects. When the true host background differs from the chosen reference medium, the difference enters the observations and propagates into anomaly estimates. For single-snapshot FDA-MIMO-GPR, this paper establishes a reference-state observation model under the distorted Born approximation and defines that difference as the reference--background medium residual, namely, the effective residual between the reference medium and the physical background medium. Hereafter, this quantity is abbreviated as the reference--background residual. Its response is derived from the Cole--Cole dispersive mapping, the reference propagation kernels, and the FDA frequency--transmit organization. The paper then constructs its observation-domain covariance, analyzes the off-diagonal channel-block structure, and uses a standard Tikhonov estimator to show how the response transfers to reconstruction error and covariance over an anomaly candidate region. Numerical results show pronounced cross-frequency and cross-channel covariance under mismatched reference states. After Tikhonov reconstruction, these structures appear as low-dimensional, concentrated pseudo-anomaly errors. Right-hand-side coherence and inter-channel correlation arise mainly because multiple transmit--receive channels jointly observe the same residual field, while FDA space-frequency coding determines their organization in the observation and reconstruction domains. The reference--background residual should therefore be modeled explicitly in reference-state selection, background suppression, and channel-covariance analysis for single-snapshot FDA-MIMO-GPR.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to model the reference--background residual in single-snapshot FDA-MIMO-GPR using the distorted Born approximation, Cole-Cole mapping, and reference kernels. It derives the residual response, constructs its observation-domain covariance with off-diagonal channel-block structure, and uses Tikhonov reconstruction to show transfer to low-dimensional pseudo-anomaly errors. Numerical results illustrate pronounced cross-frequency and cross-channel covariance under mismatched references, attributed to multi-channel observation and FDA coding.

Significance. If the central derivations are accurate, this paper makes a meaningful contribution by providing an explicit framework for analyzing reference-background mismatches in advanced GPR systems. The demonstration of how these residuals produce structured errors in reconstruction could have practical implications for improving imaging fidelity and anomaly detection in single-snapshot FDA-MIMO-GPR applications, particularly in scenarios with imperfectly known backgrounds.

major comments (1)
  1. Numerical Results section: The covariance matrices and reconstruction errors are computed directly from the forward model defined in the paper. This self-consistent simulation does not incorporate additional physical effects beyond the distorted Born and Cole-Cole approximations, raising questions about whether the observed low-dimensional pseudo-anomaly errors would remain dominant in experimental data containing unmodeled phenomena.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the notation for the reference propagation kernels to avoid ambiguity with standard Born approximation terms.
  2. The abstract is dense; consider breaking the description of the covariance analysis into clearer sentences.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and for recognizing the potential contribution of the explicit modeling framework. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Numerical Results section: The covariance matrices and reconstruction errors are computed directly from the forward model defined in the paper. This self-consistent simulation does not incorporate additional physical effects beyond the distorted Born and Cole-Cole approximations, raising questions about whether the observed low-dimensional pseudo-anomaly errors would remain dominant in experimental data containing unmodeled phenomena.

    Authors: We agree that the numerical experiments are performed within the forward model using the distorted Born approximation and Cole-Cole mapping. This choice is deliberate: it isolates the contribution of the reference-background residual, permits direct computation of its response and observation-domain covariance (including the off-diagonal channel-block structure), and demonstrates the transfer of that structure into low-dimensional pseudo-anomaly errors under Tikhonov reconstruction. The concentration of errors arises principally from the joint multi-channel observation of the same residual field and from the FDA frequency-transmit organization; these mechanisms are intrinsic to the system geometry and coding rather than to the particular approximations employed. While unmodeled physical effects present in real data could modulate the observed error patterns, the underlying inter-channel and cross-frequency coherence would be expected to persist and interact with those effects. In the revised manuscript we will add a short paragraph in the Numerical Results section that explicitly states the scope of the simulations and notes the desirability of future experimental validation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives the reference-background residual under the distorted Born approximation, Cole-Cole mapping, and reference kernels as explicit modeling choices, then constructs the observation covariance and applies Tikhonov reconstruction as direct consequences. Numerical results illustrate the structures produced by this forward model rather than claiming independent predictions or fits that reduce to the inputs by construction. No self-definitional equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The analysis remains within the stated approximations without smuggling ansatzes or renaming known results as new unifications.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

Ledger populated from abstract only; full paper may introduce additional parameters or assumptions.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Distorted Born approximation is valid for modeling observations of the residual field
    Invoked to establish the reference-state observation model.
  • domain assumption Cole-Cole dispersive mapping accurately represents frequency-dependent propagation in the medium
    Used together with reference kernels to derive the residual response.
invented entities (1)
  • reference--background residual no independent evidence
    purpose: Quantifies the effective difference between chosen reference medium and physical background that enters the observations
    Newly defined quantity whose response, covariance, and reconstruction error are derived in the paper.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5786 in / 1404 out tokens · 36910 ms · 2026-05-19T21:45:13.654533+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Electromagnetic determina- tion of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines,

    G. C. Topp, J. L. Davis, and A. P. Annan, “Electromagnetic determina- tion of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines,” Water Resources Research, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 574–582, 1980

    work page 1980

  2. [2]

    Calibration functions for estimating soil moisture from GPR dielectric constant measurements,

    R. L. Van Dam, “Calibration functions for estimating soil moisture from GPR dielectric constant measurements,”Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 392–413, 2014

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Application of ground penetrating radar methods in soil studies: A review,

    K. Zaj ´ıˇcov´a and T. Chuman, “Application of ground penetrating radar methods in soil studies: A review,”Geoderma, vol. 343, pp. 116–129, 2019

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Soil moisture estimation using tomographic ground penetrating radar in a MCMC–bayesian framework,

    J. Bao, Z. Hou, J. Ray, M. Huang, L. P. Swiler, and H. Ren, “Soil moisture estimation using tomographic ground penetrating radar in a MCMC–bayesian framework,”Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 2213–2231, 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Inference of multi-Gaussian relative permittivity fields by probabilistic inversion of crosshole GPR data,

    J. Hunziker, E. Laloy, and N. Linde, “Inference of multi-Gaussian relative permittivity fields by probabilistic inversion of crosshole GPR data,”Geophysics, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. H25–H40, 2017

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Reconstruction of two-dimensional permittivity distribution using the distorted Born iterative method,

    W. C. Chew and Y . M. Wang, “Reconstruction of two-dimensional permittivity distribution using the distorted Born iterative method,”IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 218–225, 1990

    work page 1990

  7. [7]

    Beyond the Born and Rytov approximations: A nonlinear approach to electromagnetic scattering,

    T. M. Habashy, R. W. Groom, and B. R. Spies, “Beyond the Born and Rytov approximations: A nonlinear approach to electromagnetic scattering,”Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, vol. 98, no. B2, pp. 1759–1775, 1993

    work page 1993

  8. [8]

    A modified gradient method for two-dimensional problems in tomography,

    R. E. Kleinman and P. M. van den Berg, “A modified gradient method for two-dimensional problems in tomography,”Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 17–35, 1992

    work page 1992

  9. [9]

    Modified 2 gradient method and modified Born method for solving a two-dimensional inverse scattering problems,

    K. Belkebir and A. G. Tijhuis, “Modified 2 gradient method and modified Born method for solving a two-dimensional inverse scattering problems,” Inverse Problems, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1671–1688, 2001

    work page 2001

  10. [10]

    Inverse scattering of two-dimensional dielectric objects buried in a lossy earth using the distorted Born iterative method,

    T. J. Cui, W. C. Chew, A. A. Aydiner, and S. Chen, “Inverse scattering of two-dimensional dielectric objects buried in a lossy earth using the distorted Born iterative method,”IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 339–346, 2001

    work page 2001

  11. [11]

    Linear GPR inversion for lossy soil and a planar air- soil interface,

    P. Meincke, “Linear GPR inversion for lossy soil and a planar air- soil interface,”IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 2713–2721, 2001

    work page 2001

  12. [12]

    Modeling of ground-penetrating radar for accurate characterization of subsurface electric properties,

    S. Lambot, E. C. Slob, I. van den Bosch, B. Stockbroeckx, and M. Vanclooster, “Modeling of ground-penetrating radar for accurate characterization of subsurface electric properties,”IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 2555–2568, 2004

    work page 2004

  13. [13]

    A contrast source inversion method,

    P. M. van den Berg and R. E. Kleinman, “A contrast source inversion method,”Inverse Problems, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1607–1620, 1997

    work page 1997

  14. [14]

    Contrast source inversion method: State of art,

    P. M. van den Berg and A. Abubakar, “Contrast source inversion method: State of art,”Progress In Electromagnetics Research, vol. 34, pp. 189– 218, 2001

    work page 2001

  15. [15]

    The contrast source inversion method for location and shape reconstructions,

    A. Abubakar and P. M. van den Berg, “The contrast source inversion method for location and shape reconstructions,”Inverse Problems, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 495–510, 2002

    work page 2002

  16. [16]

    Imaging of biomedical data using a multiplicative regularized contrast source inver- sion method,

    A. Abubakar, P. M. van den Berg, and J. J. Mallorqui, “Imaging of biomedical data using a multiplicative regularized contrast source inver- sion method,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1761–1771, 2002

    work page 2002

  17. [17]

    A finite- difference contrast source inversion method,

    A. Abubakar, W. Hu, P. M. van den Berg, and T. M. Habashy, “A finite- difference contrast source inversion method,”Inverse Problems, vol. 24, no. 6, p. 065004, 2008

    work page 2008

  18. [18]

    Incremental distorted multiplicative regularized contrast source inversion for inhomo- geneous background: The case of TM data,

    L. Guo, M. Zhong, G. Song, S. Yang, and L. Gong, “Incremental distorted multiplicative regularized contrast source inversion for inhomo- geneous background: The case of TM data,”Electromagnetics, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 445–461, 2020

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Subsurface inverse scattering problems: Quantifying, qualifying, and achieving the available information,

    O. M. Bucci, L. Crocco, T. Isernia, and V . Pascazio, “Subsurface inverse scattering problems: Quantifying, qualifying, and achieving the available information,”IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 2527–2538, 2001

    work page 2001

  20. [20]

    Full-waveform inversion of ground-penetrating radar data in frequency-dependent media involving permittivity attenuation,

    T. Qin, T. Bohlen, and N. Allroggen, “Full-waveform inversion of ground-penetrating radar data in frequency-dependent media involving permittivity attenuation,”Geophysical Journal International, vol. 232, no. 1, pp. 504–522, 2022

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Indirect joint petrophysical inversion of synthetic shallow-seismic and multi-offset ground-penetrating radar data,

    T. Qin, T. Bohlen, and Y . Pan, “Indirect joint petrophysical inversion of synthetic shallow-seismic and multi-offset ground-penetrating radar data,”Geophysical Journal International, vol. 229, no. 3, pp. 1770– 1784, 2022

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Full waveform inversion of common-offset ground-penetrating radar based on a special source wavelet and multiple integral wave-field transform,

    C. Fu, Y . Jiang, Z. Xie, X. Li, L. Yao, K. Liu, Y . Zhao, F. Zhang, and P. Jiang, “Full waveform inversion of common-offset ground-penetrating radar based on a special source wavelet and multiple integral wave-field transform,”Journal of Applied Geophysics, vol. 206, p. 104795, 2022

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Efficient source-independent full waveform dual-parameter inversion of common-offset GPR data,

    D. Feng, Y . Liu, X. Wang, and S. Ding, “Efficient source-independent full waveform dual-parameter inversion of common-offset GPR data,” Journal of Applied Geophysics, vol. 208, p. 104891, 2023

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    An efficient dual-parameter full waveform inversion for GPR data using data encoding,

    D.-S. Feng, B. Li, X. Wang, S. Ding, X. Tai, L. Cai, and X. Su, “An efficient dual-parameter full waveform inversion for GPR data using data encoding,”IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 61, pp. 1–11, 2023

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Implicit multiparameter full waveform inversion of multioffset ground penetrating radar data,

    J. Sun, Y . Liu, Y . Lin, L. Xing, and H. Liu, “Implicit multiparameter full waveform inversion of multioffset ground penetrating radar data,” Geophysical Journal International, vol. 240, no. 2, pp. 904–919, 2025

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Multiobjective waveform inversion of multioffset surface ground-penetrating radar data,

    Q. Tan and Y . Pan, “Multiobjective waveform inversion of multioffset surface ground-penetrating radar data,”IEEE Transactions on Geo- science and Remote Sensing, vol. 63, pp. 1–14, 2025

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Crosshole ground-penetrating radar full- waveform inversion by combining optimal-transport and least-squares distances,

    J. Hunziker and N. Linde, “Crosshole ground-penetrating radar full- waveform inversion by combining optimal-transport and least-squares distances,”Journal of Applied Geophysics, vol. 237, p. 105655, 2025

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    GPR-FWI-Py: Open-source Python software for multi-scale regularized full waveform inversion in ground penetrating radar using random excitation sources,

    X. Wang, H. Liu, and X. Meng, “GPR-FWI-Py: Open-source Python software for multi-scale regularized full waveform inversion in ground penetrating radar using random excitation sources,”Computers & Geo- sciences, vol. 197, p. 105870, 2025

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Fast ground penetrating radar dual-parameter full waveform inversion method accel- erated by hybrid compilation of CUDA kernel function and PyTorch,

    L. Liu, C. Song, L. He, S. Wang, X. Feng, and C. Liu, “Fast ground penetrating radar dual-parameter full waveform inversion method accel- erated by hybrid compilation of CUDA kernel function and PyTorch,” Computers & Geosciences, vol. 209, p. 106101, 2026

    work page 2026

  30. [30]

    Detection of subsurface target based on FDA-MIMO radar,

    Q. Liu, C. Jiang, L. Jin, and S. Ouyang, “Detection of subsurface target based on FDA-MIMO radar,”International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 2018, pp. 1–8, 2018

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    FDA-MIMO radar range-angle estimation: CRLB, MSE, and resolution analysis,

    J. Xiong, W.-Q. Wang, and K. Gao, “FDA-MIMO radar range-angle estimation: CRLB, MSE, and resolution analysis,”IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 284–294, 2018. 14

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    Single- snapshot angle and incremental range estimation for FDA-MIMO radar,

    L. Lan, M. Rosamilia, A. Aubry, A. D. Maio, and G. Liao, “Single- snapshot angle and incremental range estimation for FDA-MIMO radar,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 3705–3718, 2021

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Waveform design for moving target detection with FDA-MIMO radar exploiting correlation and doppler tol- erance properties,

    J. Qi, L. Lan, G. Liao, and J. Xu, “Waveform design for moving target detection with FDA-MIMO radar exploiting correlation and doppler tol- erance properties,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 11 978–11 992, 2025

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    On the use of the Cole–Cole equations in spectral induced polarization,

    A. Tarasov and K. Titov, “On the use of the Cole–Cole equations in spectral induced polarization,”Geophysical Journal International, vol. 195, no. 1, pp. 352–356, 2013

    work page 2013

  35. [35]

    Debye decomposition of time-lapse spectral induced polarisation data,

    M. Weigand and A. Kemna, “Debye decomposition of time-lapse spectral induced polarisation data,”Computers & Geosciences, vol. 86, pp. 34–45, 2016

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Relationship between Cole–Cole model parameters and spectral decomposition parameters derived from spectral induced polarization data,

    ——, “Relationship between Cole–Cole model parameters and spectral decomposition parameters derived from spectral induced polarization data,”Geophysical Journal International, vol. 205, no. 3, pp. 1414– 1419, 2016

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    A. N. Tikhonov and V . Y . Arsenin,Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems. Washington, DC: W. H. Winston, 1977

    work page 1977

  38. [38]

    Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve,

    P. C. Hansen, “Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve,”SIAM Review, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 561–580, 1992

    work page 1992

  39. [39]

    The use of the L-curve in the regularization of discrete ill-posed problems,

    P. C. Hansen and D. P. O’Leary, “The use of the L-curve in the regularization of discrete ill-posed problems,”SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1487–1503, 1993

    work page 1993

  40. [40]

    P. C. Hansen,Rank-Deficient and Discrete Ill-Posed Problems: Numer- ical Aspects of Linear Inversion. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 1998

    work page 1998

  41. [41]

    Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 2010

    ——,Discrete Inverse Problems: Insight and Algorithms. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 2010

    work page 2010

  42. [42]

    Elec- trical properties of lunar soil: Dependence on frequency, temperature and moisture,

    D. W. Strangway, G. R. Olhoeft, W. B. Chapman, and J. Carnes, “Elec- trical properties of lunar soil: Dependence on frequency, temperature and moisture,”Earth and Planetary Science Letters, vol. 16, p. 275, 1972

    work page 1972

  43. [43]

    Electrical properties of lunar soil sample 15301,38,

    G. R. Olhoeft, A. L. Frisillo, and D. W. Strangway, “Electrical properties of lunar soil sample 15301,38,” inProceedings of the Fifth Lunar Science Conference, 1974, pp. 3133–3149

    work page 1974

  44. [44]

    Electrical properties of lunar solid samples,

    G. R. Olhoeft, A. L. Frisillo, D. W. Strangway, and H. Sharpe, “Electrical properties of lunar solid samples,” inProceedings of the Fourth Lunar Science Conference, 1973, pp. 575–577

    work page 1973

  45. [45]

    Dielectric properties of ice and solid D2O,

    R. P. Auty and R. H. Cole, “Dielectric properties of ice and solid D2O,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1309–1314, 1952

    work page 1952

  46. [46]

    Development of a resonant microwave sensor for sediment density characterization,

    R. Mansour, S. Rioual, B. Lescop, P. Talbot, M. Abboud, W. Farah, and G. Tann´e, “Development of a resonant microwave sensor for sediment density characterization,”Sensors, vol. 20, no. 4, p. 1058, 2020

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Dielectric properties of a clay soil determined in the frequency range from 1 MHz to 40 GHz,

    M. Schwing, Z. Chen, A. Scheuermann, and N. Wagner, “Dielectric properties of a clay soil determined in the frequency range from 1 MHz to 40 GHz,” inProceedings of the 10th International Conference on Electromagnetic Wave Interaction with Water and Moist Substances (ISEMA 2013), Weimar, Germany, 2013, pp. 242–250

    work page 2013