pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17751 · v1 · pith:44Y432JJnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · ✦ hep-th

An Alternative Viewpoint on Kinematic Flow from Tubing Splitting

Ji-Yuan Ke , Ping He This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 10:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords kinematic flowgraph tubingswavefunction coefficientspower-law cosmologytr phi^3 theorydifferential equationstime orderingFeynman diagrams
0
0 comments X

The pith

Graph tubings can be split by reversing their kinematic evolution to recover the differential equations for cosmological wavefunctions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper recasts differential equations for wavefunction coefficients of conformally coupled scalars in power-law cosmology as an iterative system of basis functions encoded in graph tubings. These functions evolve according to kinematic flow rules in kinematic space. By reversing the direction of tubing evolution, the authors construct splitting rules that generate the same differential equations at tree level. This reformulation exposes structures such as singularities and local evolution, and in a time-ordered basis it points to how time arises from kinematic space. The result extends beyond single diagrams to the tr phi^3 theory, suggesting the tubings themselves may be primary objects.

Core claim

Reformulating the relations among basis functions by reversing the evolution direction of the tubings yields splitting rules equivalent to the kinematic flow at tree level. These rules recover the original differential equations without loss or addition of content and reveal richer physical structures such as singularities and local evolution. In an alternative time-ordered basis the same rules imply how time emerges from kinematic space. The construction is not limited to individual Feynman diagrams and generalizes to the tr phi^3 theory.

What carries the argument

Graph tubings that encode the basis functions, together with splitting rules obtained by reversing the direction of their kinematic flow evolution.

If this is right

  • The differential equations arise directly from the splitting rules at tree level.
  • Singularities and local evolution become visible as features of the tubing splitting process.
  • In a time-ordered basis the rules indicate how time can emerge from kinematic space.
  • The same construction applies to the full tr phi^3 theory, not just isolated diagrams.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The splitting perspective may offer a route to computing higher-point functions by iterating tubing splits instead of solving differential equations directly.
  • The viewpoint could be tested for consistency with known properties such as unitarity or causality in cosmological correlators.
  • Similar reversal techniques might apply to other graph-based representations in scattering amplitudes where differential equations appear.

Load-bearing premise

Splitting rules built by reversing tubing evolution are exactly equivalent to the original kinematic flow differential equations at tree level, without adding or removing physical content.

What would settle it

Take a known tree-level Feynman diagram for the cosmological wavefunction, apply the proposed splitting rules to its tubings, and check whether the generated differential equations match the standard ones exactly, with no extra singularities or missing terms.

read the original abstract

The differential equations satisfied by the wavefunction coefficients of conformally coupled scalars in a power-law cosmology can be recast into an iterative differential system of basis functions. These functions can be encoded within graph tubings, and are governed by a set of rules describing how they flow in kinematic space. In this paper we propose a new viewpoint on the kinematic flow by reformulating the relations among these basis functions through reversing the evolution direction of the tubings. The differential equations can then be derived by constructing appropriate splitting rules equivalent to the kinematic flow (at tree level). While the implementation of these rules can be somewhat complicated, they reveal richer physical structures underlying the differential equations, such as singularities and local evolution. Under an alternative basis based on time ordering, these rules offer important implications for how time emerges from kinematic space. This conclusion is even not restricted to individual Feynman diagrams, and can be generalized to the tr $\phi^3$ theory. This suggests that the tubings, as well as the kinematic flow, might be more fundamental objects than the differential equations, and have a life of their own.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an alternative viewpoint on the kinematic flow governing basis functions that encode wavefunction coefficients for conformally coupled scalars in power-law cosmology. These functions are encoded in graph tubings whose evolution is governed by kinematic-space rules. By reversing the direction of tubing evolution, the authors construct splitting rules claimed to be equivalent to the original differential equations at tree level. The reformulation is said to expose richer structures including singularities and local evolution; under a time-ordering basis it yields implications for the emergence of time from kinematic space. The construction is asserted to extend beyond individual Feynman diagrams to the full tr φ³ theory, implying that tubings and kinematic flow may be more fundamental objects than the differential equations themselves.

Significance. If the claimed equivalence is rigorously established without loss or addition of content and the generalization to tr φ³ holds, the work could supply a useful new perspective on the structures underlying kinematic flows in cosmological wavefunctions. It might illuminate connections between time ordering, singularities, and local evolution, and could suggest that tubings constitute independent objects with their own dynamics. The potential for broader applicability beyond tree-level diagrams is intriguing provided concrete verification is supplied.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on reformulating relations among basis functions): the central assertion that splitting rules obtained by reversing tubing evolution are equivalent to the kinematic flow differential equations at tree level is stated without an explicit derivation, independent check, or comparison to known results. This equivalence is load-bearing for the claim that no physical content is lost or added and must be demonstrated to avoid the risk of circular re-labeling.
  2. [Generalization to tr φ³] Section on generalization to tr φ³ theory: the extension beyond individual diagrams is asserted, yet the load-bearing step—that the basis-function relations and time-ordering reformulation remain faithful under summation over diagrams—is not shown. If the reversal operation is diagram-specific or relies on identities that fail to survive the sum, the conclusion that tubings are more fundamental would not hold for the complete theory.
minor comments (1)
  1. The notation for the basis functions and the precise definition of the reversed evolution operator should be introduced with an explicit equation or diagram in the main text to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and rigor of our presentation. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate explicit demonstrations where needed.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on reformulating relations among basis functions): the central assertion that splitting rules obtained by reversing tubing evolution are equivalent to the kinematic flow differential equations at tree level is stated without an explicit derivation, independent check, or comparison to known results. This equivalence is load-bearing for the claim that no physical content is lost or added and must be demonstrated to avoid the risk of circular re-labeling.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation is necessary to establish the equivalence rigorously. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (Section 3.3) that derives the splitting rules directly from the reversed tubing evolution, beginning with the definition of the reversed flow on a single tubing and proceeding through the construction of the associated splitting operators. We then verify equivalence by explicit computation on a representative tree-level diagram, showing that the relations obtained from the splitting rules reproduce the original kinematic flow differential equations term by term. This comparison is performed independently of the original differential-equation derivation, thereby removing any risk of circularity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Generalization to tr φ³] Section on generalization to tr φ³ theory: the extension beyond individual diagrams is asserted, yet the load-bearing step—that the basis-function relations and time-ordering reformulation remain faithful under summation over diagrams—is not shown. If the reversal operation is diagram-specific or relies on identities that fail to survive the sum, the conclusion that tubings are more fundamental would not hold for the complete theory.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. The original manuscript asserted the generalization on the basis of linearity of the kinematic flow, but we acknowledge that an explicit demonstration for the summed theory strengthens the claim. In the revised Section 5 we now show that the reversal operation commutes with diagram summation because both the tubing evolution rules and the resulting splitting rules are linear. We further demonstrate that the time-ordering basis is preserved under the sum by proving that the ordering relations among tubings remain consistent when diagrams are added. A concrete two-diagram example in tr φ³ theory is worked out to illustrate that the emergent time structure and singularity structure survive the summation without loss of content. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; reformulation provides alternative viewpoint without reducing to input by construction

full rationale

The paper recasts differential equations for wavefunction coefficients into an iterative system encoded in graph tubings governed by kinematic flow rules. It then proposes reformulating relations among basis functions by reversing tubing evolution direction, from which splitting rules are constructed that are stated to be equivalent to the original kinematic flow at tree level. This allows re-deriving the differential equations while highlighting additional structures such as singularities, local evolution, and time-ordering implications. The generalization to tr ϕ³ theory is asserted as extending beyond individual diagrams. No load-bearing step reduces by the paper's own equations or self-citation to a tautological re-labeling of the inputs; the reversal is presented as a genuine reformulation that extracts new physical content rather than a definitional equivalence or fitted prediction. The derivation chain remains self-contained against the stated assumptions without invoking unverified uniqueness theorems or ansatze smuggled via citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract invokes standard assumptions of conformally coupled scalars in power-law cosmology and tree-level perturbation theory without listing new free parameters or invented entities; the equivalence of splitting rules to kinematic flow is treated as a domain assumption.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The differential equations for wavefunction coefficients can be recast into an iterative system of basis functions encoded by graph tubings.
    Stated in the first sentence of the abstract as the starting point for the reformulation.
  • ad hoc to paper Reversing the evolution direction of tubings yields splitting rules equivalent to the original kinematic flow at tree level.
    This is the key reformulation step proposed in the paper and is not derived from more basic principles in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5716 in / 1544 out tokens · 41087 ms · 2026-05-20T10:09:01.786719+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages · 24 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Cosmological Bootstrap: Inflationary Correlators from Symmetries and Singularities,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, “The Cosmological Bootstrap: Inflationary Correlators from Symmetries and Singularities,”JHEP04(2020) 105, arXiv:1811.00024 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  2. [2]

    Differential equations for cosmological correlators,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, A. Hillman, A. Joyce, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, “Differential equations for cosmological correlators,”JHEP09(2025) 009,arXiv:2312.05303 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Kinematic Flow and the Emergence of Time,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, A. Hillman, A. Joyce, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, “Kinematic Flow and the Emergence of Time,”Phys. Rev. Lett.135no. 3, (2025) 031602,arXiv:2312.05300 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    From amplitudes to analytic wavefunctions,

    M. H. G. Lee, “From amplitudes to analytic wavefunctions,”JHEP03(2024) 058, arXiv:2310.01525 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Implications of conformal invariance in momentum space

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden, and K. Skenderis, “Implications of conformal invariance in momentum space,”JHEP03(2014) 111,arXiv:1304.7760 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    Scalar 3-point functions in CFT: renormalisation, beta functions and anomalies

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden, and K. Skenderis, “Scalar 3-point functions in CFT: renormalisation, beta functions and anomalies,”JHEP03(2016) 066,arXiv:1510.08442 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Renormalised 3-point functions of stress tensors and conserved currents in CFT

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden, and K. Skenderis, “Renormalised 3-point functions of stress tensors and conserved currents in CFT,”JHEP11(2018) 153,arXiv:1711.09105 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Conformaln-point functions in momentum space,

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden, and K. Skenderis, “Conformaln-point functions in momentum space,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124no. 13, (2020) 131602,arXiv:1910.10162 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    Conformal correlators as simplex integrals in momentum space,

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden, and K. Skenderis, “Conformal correlators as simplex integrals in momentum space,”JHEP01(2021) 192,arXiv:2008.07543 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Scale Invariance, Conformality, and Generalized Free Fields

    A. Dymarsky, K. Farnsworth, Z. Komargodski, M. A. Luty, and V. Prilepina, “Scale Invariance, Conformality, and Generalized Free Fields,”JHEP02(2016) 099,arXiv:1402.6322 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  11. [11]

    Momentum-space conformal blocks on the light cone,

    M. Gillioz, “Momentum-space conformal blocks on the light cone,”JHEP10(2018) 125, arXiv:1807.07003 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Conformal 3-point functions and the Lorentzian OPE in momentum space,

    M. Gillioz, “Conformal 3-point functions and the Lorentzian OPE in momentum space,”Commun. Math. Phys.379no. 1, (2020) 227–259,arXiv:1909.00878 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    A scattering amplitude in Conformal Field Theory,

    M. Gillioz, M. Meineri, and J. Penedones, “A scattering amplitude in Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP11(2020) 139,arXiv:2003.07361 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  14. [14]

    Linking the singularities of cosmological correlators,

    D. Baumann, W.-M. Chen, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, “Linking the singularities of cosmological correlators,”JHEP09(2022) 010,arXiv:2106.05294 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    The Cosmological Optical Theorem,

    H. Goodhew, S. Jazayeri, and E. Pajer, “The Cosmological Optical Theorem,”JCAP04(2021) 021,arXiv:2009.02898 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Cutting cosmological correlators,

    H. Goodhew, S. Jazayeri, M. H. G. Lee, and E. Pajer, “Cutting cosmological correlators,”JCAP08 (2021) 003,arXiv:2104.06587 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Cosmological Cutting Rules,

    S. Melville and E. Pajer, “Cosmological Cutting Rules,”JHEP05(2021) 249,arXiv:2103.09832 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    New Recursion Relations and a Flat Space Limit for AdS/CFT Correlators

    S. Raju, “New Recursion Relations and a Flat Space Limit for AdS/CFT Correlators,”Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 126009,arXiv:1201.6449 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  19. [19]

    On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation

    J. M. Maldacena and G. L. Pimentel, “On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation,”JHEP09 (2011) 045,arXiv:1104.2846 [hep-th]. 54

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  20. [20]

    Spinning Conformal Blocks

    M. S. Costa, J. Penedones, D. Poland, and S. Rychkov, “Spinning Conformal Blocks,”JHEP11 (2011) 154,arXiv:1109.6321 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  21. [21]

    AdS Weight Shifting Operators

    M. S. Costa and T. Hansen, “AdS Weight Shifting Operators,”JHEP09(2018) 040, arXiv:1805.01492 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Weight Shifting Operators and Conformal Blocks,

    D. Karateev, P. Kravchuk, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Weight Shifting Operators and Conformal Blocks,”JHEP02(2018) 081,arXiv:1706.07813 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2018

  23. [23]

    The cosmological bootstrap: weight-shifting operators and scalar seeds,

    D. Baumann, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, “The cosmological bootstrap: weight-shifting operators and scalar seeds,”JHEP12(2020) 204,arXiv:1910.14051 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    The Cosmological Bootstrap: Spinning Correlators from Symmetries and Factorization,

    D. Baumann, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, “The Cosmological Bootstrap: Spinning Correlators from Symmetries and Factorization,”SciPost Phys.11(2021) 071, arXiv:2005.04234 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Cosmological Collider Physics

    N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Maldacena, “Cosmological Collider Physics,”arXiv:1503.08043 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    Snowmass White Paper: The Cosmological Bootstrap,

    D. Baumann, D. Green, A. Joyce, E. Pajer, G. L. Pimentel, C. Sleight, and M. Taronna, “Snowmass White Paper: The Cosmological Bootstrap,”SciPost Phys. Comm. Rep.2024(2024) 1, arXiv:2203.08121 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    A Mellin Space Approach to Cosmological Correlators,

    C. Sleight, “A Mellin Space Approach to Cosmological Correlators,”JHEP01(2020) 090, arXiv:1906.12302 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    Bootstrapping Inflationary Correlators in Mellin Space,

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna, “Bootstrapping Inflationary Correlators in Mellin Space,”JHEP02 (2020) 098,arXiv:1907.01143 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    Building a Boostless Bootstrap for the Bispectrum,

    E. Pajer, “Building a Boostless Bootstrap for the Bispectrum,”JCAP01(2021) 023, arXiv:2010.12818 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    On duality of color and kinematics in (A)dS momentum space,

    S. Albayrak, S. Kharel, and D. Meltzer, “On duality of color and kinematics in (A)dS momentum space,”JHEP03(2021) 249,arXiv:2012.10460 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    The Analytic Wavefunction,

    S. A. Salcedo, M. H. G. Lee, S. Melville, and E. Pajer, “The Analytic Wavefunction,”JHEP06 (2023) 020,arXiv:2212.08009 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    A cosmological bootstrap for resonant non-Gaussianity,

    C. Duaso Pueyo and E. Pajer, “A cosmological bootstrap for resonant non-Gaussianity,”JHEP03 (2024) 098,arXiv:2311.01395 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    The inflationary wavefunction from analyticity and factorization,

    D. Meltzer, “The inflationary wavefunction from analyticity and factorization,”JCAP12no. 12, (2021) 018,arXiv:2107.10266 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    Analyticity and unitarity for cosmological correlators,

    L. Di Pietro, V. Gorbenko, and S. Komatsu, “Analyticity and unitarity for cosmological correlators,”JHEP03(2022) 023,arXiv:2108.01695 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Analytical evaluation of cosmological correlation functions,

    T. Heckelbacher, I. Sachs, E. Skvortsov, and P. Vanhove, “Analytical evaluation of cosmological correlation functions,”JHEP08(2022) 139,arXiv:2204.07217 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Hogervorst, J

    M. Hogervorst, J. Penedones, and K. S. Vaziri, “Towards the non-perturbative cosmological bootstrap,”JHEP02(2023) 162,arXiv:2107.13871 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Boostless cosmological collider bootstrap,

    G. L. Pimentel and D.-G. Wang, “Boostless cosmological collider bootstrap,”JHEP10(2022) 177, arXiv:2205.00013 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    From locality and unitarity to cosmological correlators,

    S. Jazayeri, E. Pajer, and D. Stefanyszyn, “From locality and unitarity to cosmological correlators,” JHEP10(2021) 065,arXiv:2103.08649 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Cosmological bootstrap in slow motion,

    S. Jazayeri and S. Renaux-Petel, “Cosmological bootstrap in slow motion,”JHEP12(2022) 137, arXiv:2205.10340 [hep-th]. 55

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Loparco, J

    M. Loparco, J. Penedones, K. Salehi Vaziri, and Z. Sun, “The K¨ all´ en-Lehmann representation in de Sitter spacetime,”JHEP12(2023) 159,arXiv:2306.00090 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    A non-perturbative construction of the de Sitter late-time boundary,

    K. Salehi Vaziri, “A non-perturbative construction of the de Sitter late-time boundary,” arXiv:2412.00183 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    Enhanced soft limits in de Sitter space,

    C. Armstrong, A. Lipstein, and J. Mei, “Enhanced soft limits in de Sitter space,”JHEP12(2022) 064,arXiv:2210.02285 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    Steinmann Relations and the Wavefunction of the Universe,

    P. Benincasa, A. J. McLeod, and C. Vergu, “Steinmann Relations and the Wavefunction of the Universe,”Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 125004,arXiv:2009.03047 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Perturbative unitarity and the wavefunction of the Universe,

    S. Albayrak, P. Benincasa, and C. Duaso Pueyo, “Perturbative unitarity and the wavefunction of the Universe,”SciPost Phys.16no. 6, (2024) 157,arXiv:2305.19686 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Cosmological correlators with double massive exchanges: bootstrap equation and phenomenology,

    S. Aoki, L. Pinol, F. Sano, M. Yamaguchi, and Y. Zhu, “Cosmological correlators with double massive exchanges: bootstrap equation and phenomenology,”JHEP09(2024) 176, arXiv:2404.09547 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Dispersive bootstrap of massive inflation correlators,

    H. Liu, Z. Qin, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Dispersive bootstrap of massive inflation correlators,”JHEP02 (2025) 101,arXiv:2407.12299 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Bootstrapping the cosmological collider with resonant features,

    D.-G. Wang and B. Zhang, “Bootstrapping the cosmological collider with resonant features,”JHEP 09(2025) 122,arXiv:2505.19066 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Geometry of Kinematic Flow,

    D. Baumann, H. Goodhew, A. Joyce, H. Lee, G. L. Pimentel, and T. Westerdijk, “Geometry of Kinematic Flow,”arXiv:2504.14890 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    A physical basis for cosmological correlators from cuts,

    S. De and A. Pokraka, “A physical basis for cosmological correlators from cuts,”JHEP03(2025) 040,arXiv:2411.09695 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Cosmology meets cohomology,

    S. De and A. Pokraka, “Cosmology meets cohomology,”JHEP03(2024) 156,arXiv:2308.03753 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Algebraic approaches to cosmological integrals,

    C. Fevola, G. L. Pimentel, A.-L. Sattelberger, and T. Westerdijk, “Algebraic approaches to cosmological integrals,”Matematiche80no. 1, (2025) 303–324,arXiv:2410.14757 [math.AG]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Differential equations and recursive solutions for cosmological amplitudes,

    S. He, X. Jiang, J. Liu, Q. Yang, and Y.-Q. Zhang, “Differential equations and recursive solutions for cosmological amplitudes,”JHEP01(2025) 001,arXiv:2407.17715 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    An Amplitude fornGluon Scattering,

    S. J. Parke and T. R. Taylor, “An Amplitude fornGluon Scattering,”Phys. Rev. Lett.56(1986) 2459

    work page 1986

  54. [54]

    Consistency Conditions on the S-Matrix of Massless Particles

    P. Benincasa and F. Cachazo, “Consistency Conditions on the S-Matrix of Massless Particles,” arXiv:0705.4305 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    A simple formula for gravitational MHV amplitudes

    A. Hodges, “A simple formula for gravitational MHV amplitudes,”arXiv:1204.1930 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1930

  56. [56]

    Effective Field Theories from Soft Limits

    C. Cheung, K. Kampf, J. Novotny, and J. Trnka, “Effective Field Theories from Soft Limits of Scattering Amplitudes,”Phys. Rev. Lett.114no. 22, (2015) 221602,arXiv:1412.4095 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  57. [57]

    Scattering Forms and the Positive Geometry of Kinematics, Color and the Worldsheet

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y. Bai, S. He, and G. Yan, “Scattering Forms and the Positive Geometry of Kinematics, Color and the Worldsheet,”JHEP05(2018) 096,arXiv:1711.09102 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  58. [58]

    Status of Intersection Theory and Feynman Integrals,

    S. Mizera, “Status of Intersection Theory and Feynman Integrals,”PoSMA2019(2019) 016, arXiv:2002.10476 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  59. [59]

    Feynman Integrals and Intersection Theory

    P. Mastrolia and S. Mizera, “Feynman Integrals and Intersection Theory,”JHEP02(2019) 139, arXiv:1810.03818 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Weinzierl,Feynman Integrals

    S. Weinzierl,Feynman Integrals. A Comprehensive Treatment for Students and Researchers. UNITEXT for Physics. Springer, 2022.arXiv:2201.03593 [hep-th]. 56

    work page arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    Quantum Fields and Cosmology

    D. Baumann and A. Joyce, “Quantum Fields and Cosmology.” to appear

    work page

  62. [62]

    Kinematic flow for cosmological loop integrands,

    D. Baumann, H. Goodhew, and H. Lee, “Kinematic flow for cosmological loop integrands,”JHEP 07(2025) 131,arXiv:2410.17994 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Cosmological Polytopes and the Wavefunction of the Universe

    N. Arkani-Hamed, P. Benincasa, and A. Postnikov, “Cosmological Polytopes and the Wavefunction of the Universe,”arXiv:1709.02813 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    One-loop corrections to the Bunch-Davies wave function of the universe,

    P. Benincasa, G. Brunello, M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, and F. Vaz˜ ao, “One-loop corrections to the Bunch-Davies wave function of the universe,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 8, (2025) 085016, arXiv:2408.16386 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Bananas are unparticles: differential equations and cosmological bootstrap,

    T. Westerdijk and C. Yang, “Bananas are unparticles: differential equations and cosmological bootstrap,”JHEP09(2025) 089,arXiv:2503.08775 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Cosmological amplitudes in power-law FRW universe,

    B. Fan and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Cosmological amplitudes in power-law FRW universe,”JHEP12(2024) 042,arXiv:2403.07050 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  67. [67]

    A note on kinematic flow and differential equations for two-site one-loop graph in FRW spacetime,

    Y. Hang and C. Shen, “A note on kinematic flow and differential equations for two-site one-loop graph in FRW spacetime,”JHEP09(2025) 209,arXiv:2410.17192 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Massive inflationary amplitudes: differential equations and complete solutions for general trees,

    H. Liu and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Massive inflationary amplitudes: differential equations and complete solutions for general trees,”JHEP09(2025) 183,arXiv:2412.07843 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Differential equations for tree-level cosmological correlators with massive states,

    F. Gasparotto, P. Mazloumi, and X. Xu, “Differential equations for tree-level cosmological correlators with massive states,”JHEP09(2025) 043,arXiv:2411.05632 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Differential Equations for Massive Correlators

    D. Baumann, A. Joyce, H. Lee, and K. Salehi Vaziri, “Differential Equations for Massive Correlators,”arXiv:2604.08658 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [71]

    Strongly Coupled Sectors in Inflation: Gapless Theories and Unparticles

    G. L. Pimentel and C. Yang, “Strongly Coupled Sectors in Inflation: Gapless Theories and Unparticles,”arXiv:2503.17840 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [72]

    Kinematic Flow for Banana Loops and Unparticles

    T. Westerdijk and C. Yang, “Kinematic Flow for Banana Loops and Unparticles,” arXiv:2604.22918 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [73]

    Canonical Differential Equations for Cosmology from Positive Geometries,

    M. Capuano, L. Ferro, T. Lukowski, and A. Palazio, “Canonical Differential Equations for Cosmology from Positive Geometries,”arXiv:2505.14609 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  74. [74]

    Positive Geometries and Canonical Forms

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y. Bai, and T. Lam, “Positive Geometries and Canonical Forms,”JHEP11 (2017) 039,arXiv:1703.04541 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  75. [75]

    Structure and complexity of cosmological correlators,

    T. W. Grimm, A. Hoefnagels, and M. van Vliet, “Structure and complexity of cosmological correlators,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 12, (2024) 123531,arXiv:2404.03716 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    Wavefunction coefficients from amplitubes,

    R. Glew, “Wavefunction coefficients from amplitubes,”JHEP07(2025) 064,arXiv:2503.13596 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    Kinematic flow from the flow of cuts,

    R. Glew and A. Pokraka, “Kinematic flow from the flow of cuts,”arXiv:2508.11568 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  78. [78]

    On Cosmological Correlators at One Loop,

    G. L. Pimentel and T. Westerdijk, “On Cosmological Correlators at One Loop,”arXiv:2601.00952 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  79. [79]

    Quantum Contributions to Cosmological Correlations

    S. Weinberg, “Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations,”Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 043514,arXiv:hep-th/0506236

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  80. [80]

    Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models

    J. M. Maldacena, “Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,”JHEP05(2003) 013,arXiv:astro-ph/0210603

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

Showing first 80 references.