pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17956 · v1 · pith:UDKUDDSBnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech

Entropy additivity from exponential decay of correlations: a coarse-grained operator approach

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 01:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords entropy additivitycoarse grainingUrsell expansionpair potentialthermodynamic limitcluster decompositioncorrelation lengththermodynamic extensivity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Under exponential cluster decomposition the coarse-grained entropy is additive up to exponentially small corrections.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper constructs a derivation of entropy additivity in thermodynamics from conditions on the pair potential instead of postulating it. It defines a coarse-graining operator C that turns the microscopic Gibbs state into probabilities on phase-space cells. Applying the Ursell expansion under stability, temperedness and exponential decay of correlations with length ξ shows the total entropy equals the sum over cells plus a term that vanishes exponentially as cell size grows much larger than ξ. This recovers the standard thermodynamic limit and explains when additivity fails for long-range forces. Readers should care because it gives a first-principles reason for a basic property of large systems and quantifies deviations.

Core claim

The authors prove that for pair potentials satisfying stability, temperedness, and exponential cluster decomposition with correlation length ξ, the coarse-grained entropy S_CG equals the sum of the individual cell entropies S_i plus a correction of order |Λ|/ℓ^d times e^{-ℓ/ξ}. This follows from applying the Ursell cluster expansion to the probabilities generated by the coarse-graining operator C on single-particle phase space. The result establishes entropy additivity in the thermodynamic limit without assuming homogeneity a priori and provides a measure of non-additivity for long-range interactions via mutual information between cells.

What carries the argument

The coarse-graining operator C that produces mesoscopic probabilities from reduced densities, together with the Ursell cluster expansion that controls the inter-cell correlations.

If this is right

  • The correction to additivity is exponentially suppressed when the cell diameter greatly exceeds the correlation length.
  • Thermodynamic extensivity emerges directly from the microscopic conditions on the potential.
  • Long-range interactions lead to persistent non-additivity quantified by inter-cell mutual information.
  • Generalized Euler relations include explicit surface corrections due to non-commuting averaging and nonlinear functionals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This suggests that similar derivations could apply to other extensive quantities like energy or particle number under the same conditions.
  • Numerical tests in molecular dynamics with controlled correlation lengths could verify the scaling of the error term.
  • The non-commutativity of averaging and entropy might have analogues in other nonlinear averaging problems in physics.

Load-bearing premise

That the pair potential exhibits exponential cluster decomposition with finite correlation length ξ, allowing the cluster expansion to yield an exponentially small correction.

What would settle it

Measuring the difference between total coarse-grained entropy and the sum of cell entropies in a simulation of a stable tempered system with known exponential correlations and checking if it scales as predicted with cell size ℓ.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17956 by Bob Osano.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The One-Particle Reduced Density f (1)(x, p).The heatmap shows, for each point (x, p) in single-particle phase space, the density of probability of finding one particle at that location. For the ideal gas, f (1) is perfectly uniform in x and Gaussian in p—a smooth, symmetric blob. Non-interacting particles have no energetic preference for any position, so ϱ(x) = ϱ0 exactly. For the short-range gas, gentle … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Mesoscopic Probabilities πi,α.Each pixel in the plot represents one spatial–momentum cell Ci,α = Vi × Πα, and its colour is the probability that a randomly chosen particle occupies that cell. This is the coarse-grained version of Plot 1. The continuous density f (1)(x, p) is replaced by a discrete grid of mesoscopic probabilities πi,α (Definition 3.4, Eq. (20)): πi,α := |Ci,α| N ¯fi,α = 1 N R Ci,α f (1)(z)… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Convergence of SCG to the Gibbs Entropy: This plot addresses the most basic consistency requirement: does the mesoscopic framework agree with standard Gibbs statistics? It shows SCG/SGibbs as a function of the number of cells per dimension M, at several temperatures. Left panel: Every curve starts below 1 (the mesoscopic entropy underestimates the Gibbs entropy when cells are coarse-grained) and rises mono… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Entropy Additivity Deviation:This is the central quantitative result, implementing Proposi￾tion 4.1(ii) and Eq. (25) numerically. The plotted quantity is the total deviation from entropy additivity, |SCG − P i Si | ≤ kB C1|Λ| ℓ d e −ℓ/ξ , as a function of the dimensionless cell size ℓ/ξ. If spatial cells were statistically independent, SCG would equal P i Si exactly, and entropy would be perfectly additive… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Mutual Information Between Cells: This plot examines the statistical dependence between individual pairs of cells i and j, showing the mutual information I(i, j) as a function of their separation |xi − xj |/ξ. The mutual information I(i, j) = P α,β π(i,α)(j,β) ln π(i,α)(j,β) πi,α πj,β ≥ 0 is zero if and only if the two cells are statistically independent. Left panel: semi-log scale For the short-range gas,… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Extensivity: SCG/N vs NThis is the most physically intuitive plot. If entropy is extensive, doubling the number of particles at fixed density should double the entropy, so SCG/N must be constant. The plot tests this directly by varying N while keeping ϱ0 = N/L fixed. (i) The ideal gas gives a perfectly flat line at all N: strictly extensive, consistent with the Sackur–Tetrode formula. (ii) The short-range … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The Jensen Correction (Non-Commutativity): his plot demonstrates Proposition 3.2, the most mathematically subtle result in the paper. The question is: does it matter whether one coarse-grains first and then computes entropy, or computes entropy first and then averages spatially? The answer is yes: these two operations do not commute for any nonlinear functional such as the entropy density η(ϱ) = kBϱ ln ϱ. … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The Euler Relation Surface Correction: The standard Euler relation U = T S − P V + µN holds exactly only for infinite systems. For any finite system, Theorem 4.8 gives the corrected relation U = T S − P V + µN + E∂, E∂ = O(|∂Λ|), where E∂ arises from the boundary-breaking translational invariance. (i) Left panel( E∂ vs L): In one dimension, |∂Λ| = 2 (two boundary points), so E∂ is essentially constant as L… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Thermodynamic extensivity is commonly introduced as a postulate -- the homogeneity of degree one in thermodynamic potentials. We provide a constructive derivation of this property from microscopic conditions on the pair potential, without assuming it. Working with the one- and two-particle reduced densities of the $N$-body canonical Gibbs state, we introduce a combined coarse-graining operator $\mathcal{C}$ on single-particle phase space $\mathcal{M}=\Lambda\times\mathbb{R}^3$, producing dimensionless mesoscopic probabilities over spatial--momentum cells $\{V_i\times\Pi_\alpha\}$. Under three conditions on the pair potential -- stability, temperedness, and exponential cluster decomposition with correlation length $\xi$ -- we show, using the Ursell cluster expansion, that the coarse-grained entropy satisfies \[S_{\mathrm{CG}}=\sum_i S_i+O\!\left(\frac{|\Lambda|}{\ell^d}e^{-\ell/\xi}\right),\] where $\ell\gg\xi$ is the cell diameter. The correction is exponentially suppressed per cell, making entropy additive and recovering the thermodynamic limit of Ruelle and Fisher in explicit operator language. For systems with long-range interactions, where temperedness fails, the correction does not vanish, and non-additivity is quantified through inter-cell mutual information. We further show that spatial averaging does not commute with nonlinear thermodynamic functionals such as the entropy density -- a thermodynamic analogue of the cosmological averaging problem -- and we derive the generalised Euler relation with explicit surface corrections.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives thermodynamic extensivity of entropy from microscopic conditions on the pair potential without postulating homogeneity. It introduces a coarse-graining operator C acting on single-particle phase space to produce mesoscopic probabilities over cells of diameter ℓ, then applies the Ursell cluster expansion under stability, temperedness, and exponential cluster decomposition (correlation length ξ) to obtain S_CG = sum_i S_i + O(|Λ|/ℓ^d exp(−ℓ/ξ)) for ℓ ≫ ξ. The work also quantifies non-additivity for long-range interactions via inter-cell mutual information and shows that spatial averaging does not commute with the nonlinear entropy functional, yielding a generalized Euler relation with surface corrections.

Significance. If the central bound holds, the paper supplies an explicit operator construction that recovers the Ruelle–Fisher thermodynamic limit while quantifying finite-size corrections exponentially suppressed per cell. The treatment of non-commutativity between averaging and thermodynamic functionals is a useful clarification, and the extension to long-range cases via mutual information provides a concrete diagnostic. The approach is constructive and avoids ad-hoc postulates, though its impact hinges on whether the Ursell functions retain their decay rate after the cell averaging induced by C.

major comments (1)
  1. [Ursell expansion for coarse-grained probabilities] The claim that the Ursell expansion applied to the mesoscopic probabilities produced by operator C yields a correction strictly O((|Λ|/ℓ^d) exp(−ℓ/ξ)) with no additional polynomial factors in ℓ or |Λ| requires explicit justification. The exponential cluster decomposition is assumed at the microscopic level, but the spatial averaging over finite cells of diameter ℓ can introduce boundary contributions or modify the effective cluster functions; without a lemma controlling the action of C on the Ursell functions (e.g., in the section deriving the expansion for coarse-grained densities), the stated decay rate is not guaranteed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Definition of operator C] Define the coarse-graining operator C explicitly in the main text (including its action on one- and two-particle reduced densities) rather than deferring all details to an appendix; this operator is load-bearing for the entire construction.
  2. [Discussion section] Add a brief remark comparing the obtained correction term to existing bounds in the literature on cluster expansions for lattice systems (e.g., references to works by Ruelle or Dobrushin on exponential decay).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive major comment. We address the point directly below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional justification.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Ursell expansion for coarse-grained probabilities] The claim that the Ursell expansion applied to the mesoscopic probabilities produced by operator C yields a correction strictly O((|Λ|/ℓ^d) exp(−ℓ/ξ)) with no additional polynomial factors in ℓ or |Λ| requires explicit justification. The exponential cluster decomposition is assumed at the microscopic level, but the spatial averaging over finite cells of diameter ℓ can introduce boundary contributions or modify the effective cluster functions; without a lemma controlling the action of C on the Ursell functions (e.g., in the section deriving the expansion for coarse-grained densities), the stated decay rate is not guaranteed.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit control on the action of the coarse-graining operator C is necessary to confirm the absence of polynomial prefactors. In the revised manuscript we add Lemma 3.4, which shows that C, being a normalized integral average over cells of diameter ℓ, maps the microscopic Ursell functions to mesoscopic ones whose decay rate remains exponential with the same ξ (up to a multiplicative constant independent of ℓ and |Λ|). The proof proceeds by splitting the integral into the interior of each cell (where the microscopic decay applies directly) and a boundary layer of width ξ; the contribution of the boundary layer is bounded by the temperedness assumption and is absorbed into the local entropy terms S_i. Consequently, when the Ursell expansion is performed on the coarse-grained probabilities, the inter-cell terms are bounded by exp(−ℓ/ξ) with no additional factors of ℓ or |Λ| beyond the explicit combinatorial prefactor |Λ|/ℓ^d that already appears in the statement. We have inserted the lemma immediately after the definition of C and before the entropy expansion. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation of coarse-grained entropy additivity is self-contained from stated microscopic conditions

full rationale

The paper derives S_CG = sum_i S_i + O(|Λ|/ℓ^d exp(-ℓ/ξ)) constructively from three explicit conditions on the pair potential (stability, temperedness, exponential cluster decomposition with length ξ) by applying the standard Ursell cluster expansion to the mesoscopic probabilities generated by the coarse-graining operator C on the one- and two-particle reduced densities. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-referential definition, or load-bearing self-citation; the exponential suppression per cell is shown to follow from the assumed microscopic decay under the stated operator action, recovering the Ruelle-Fisher thermodynamic limit as an independent external benchmark. The derivation remains independent of the target result and contains no ansatz smuggling or renaming of known patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on three conditions on the pair potential and the applicability of the Ursell cluster expansion to the coarse-grained probabilities. No free parameters are introduced in the abstract. The coarse-graining operator C is an invented technical device whose properties are not independently verified here.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The pair potential satisfies stability, temperedness, and exponential cluster decomposition with finite correlation length ξ.
    Invoked to guarantee that the Ursell expansion produces an exponentially decaying inter-cell correction.
invented entities (1)
  • Coarse-graining operator C on single-particle phase space no independent evidence
    purpose: Produces dimensionless mesoscopic probabilities over spatial-momentum cells from one- and two-particle reduced densities.
    New operator introduced to define the coarse-grained entropy S_CG; no independent evidence supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5788 in / 1422 out tokens · 37080 ms · 2026-05-20T01:03:26.651114+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    H. B. Callen,Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1985)

  2. [2]

    Redlich, Intensive and extensive properties,J

    O. Redlich, Intensive and extensive properties,J. Chem. Educ.47(2), 154–156 (1970)

  3. [3]

    Ruelle,Statistical Mechanics: Rigorous Results(W

    D. Ruelle,Statistical Mechanics: Rigorous Results(W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1969)

  4. [4]

    M. E. Fisher, The free energy of a macroscopic system,Arch. Rational Mech. Anal.17, 377–410 (1964)

  5. [5]

    J. W. Gibbs,Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics(Yale University Press, New Haven, 1902)

  6. [6]

    Ehrenfest and T

    P. Ehrenfest and T. Ehrenfest,The Conceptual Foundations of the Statistical Approach in Mechanics (Teubner, Leipzig, 1912; English translation, Cornell University Press, 1959)

  7. [7]

    J. L. Lebowitz and O. Penrose, Rigorous treatment of the van der Waals–Maxwell theory of the liquid-vapour transition,J. Math. Phys.7, 98–113 (1966)

  8. [8]

    Ruelle, Classical statistical mechanics of a system of particles,Helv

    D. Ruelle, Classical statistical mechanics of a system of particles,Helv. Phys. Acta36, 183–197 (1963)

  9. [9]

    Georgii,Gibbs Measures and Phase Transitions(de Gruyter, Berlin, 1988)

    H.-O. Georgii,Gibbs Measures and Phase Transitions(de Gruyter, Berlin, 1988)

  10. [10]

    R. L. Dobrushin, The description of a random field by means of conditional probabilities and conditions of its regularity,Theory Probab. Appl.13, 197–224 (1968)

  11. [11]

    Tsallis, Possible generalization of Boltzmann–Gibbs statistics,J

    C. Tsallis, Possible generalization of Boltzmann–Gibbs statistics,J. Stat. Phys.52, 479–487 (1988)

  12. [12]

    Touchette, R

    H. Touchette, R. S. Ellis and B. Turkington An Introduction to the Thermodynamic and Macrostate Levels of Nonequivalent Ensembles,Physica A340, 138–146 (2004). 15

  13. [13]

    The Mesoscopic Partition Function:A Combined Spatial and Phase-Space Cell Structure

    B. Osano The Mesoscopic Partition Function: A Combined Spatial and Phase-Space Cell Structure Preprint: arXiv:2605.00958

  14. [14]

    Buchert, On average properties of inhomogeneous fluids in general relativity I: dust cosmologies, Gen

    T. Buchert, On average properties of inhomogeneous fluids in general relativity I: dust cosmologies, Gen. Rel. Grav.32, 105–125 (2000)

  15. [15]

    R¨ as¨ anen, Accelerated expansion from structure formation,J

    S. R¨ as¨ anen, Accelerated expansion from structure formation,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.0611, 003 (2006)

  16. [16]

    D. L. Wiltshire, What is dust? Physical foundations of the averaging problem in cosmology,Class. Quantum Grav.28, 164006 (2011)

  17. [17]

    Korzy´ nski, Covariant coarse-graining of inhomogeneous dust flow in general relativity,Class

    M. Korzy´ nski, Covariant coarse-graining of inhomogeneous dust flow in general relativity,Class. Quantum Grav.27, 105015 (2010)

  18. [18]

    J. H. Irving and J. G. Kirkwood. The statistical mechanical theory of transport processes. IV. The equations of hydrodynamics,J. Chem. Phys.18, 817–829 (1950)

  19. [19]

    Cercignani,The Boltzmann Equation and Its Applications(Springer, New York, 1988)

    C. Cercignani,The Boltzmann Equation and Its Applications(Springer, New York, 1988)

  20. [20]

    Zwanzig, Memory effects in irreversible thermodynamics,Phys

    R. Zwanzig, Memory effects in irreversible thermodynamics,Phys. Rev.124, 983–992 (1961)

  21. [21]

    Mori, Transport, collective motion, and Brownian motion,Prog

    H. Mori, Transport, collective motion, and Brownian motion,Prog. Theor. Phys.33, 423–455 (1965)

  22. [22]

    J. W. Gibbs, A method of geometrical representation of the thermodynamic properties of substances by means of surfaces,Trans. Connecticut Acad.2, 382–404 (1873)

  23. [23]

    Osano,The Thermodynamics for Relativistic Multi-Fluid Systems,Lett

    B. Osano,The Thermodynamics for Relativistic Multi-Fluid Systems,Lett. High Energy Phys.(2020)

  24. [24]

    Osano and T

    B. Osano and T. Oreta,A transient phase in cosmological evolution: A multi-fluid approximation for a quasi-thermodynamical equilibrium, (2019)

  25. [25]

    Osano, Second-order perturbation theory: a covariant approach involving a barotropic equation of state Classical and Quantum Gravity 34 (12), 125004

    B. Osano, Second-order perturbation theory: a covariant approach involving a barotropic equation of state Classical and Quantum Gravity 34 (12), 125004

  26. [26]

    Billingsley

    P. Billingsley. ”Product Measure and Fubini’s Theorem”, Probability and Measure, New York: Wiley, pp. 231–240, ISBN 0-471-00710-2

  27. [27]

    Gallavotti,Statistical Mechanics: A Short Treatise,Springer–Verlag, Berlin, 1999

    G. Gallavotti,Statistical Mechanics: A Short Treatise,Springer–Verlag, Berlin, 1999

  28. [28]

    D. C. Brydges,A Short Course on Cluster Expansions,in:K. Osterwalder and R. Stora (eds.),Critical Phenomena, Random Systems, Gauge Theories, Les Houches Summer School Proceedings, North- Holland, Amsterdam, 1986,pp. 129–183

  29. [29]

    T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas,Elements of Information Theory, 2nd ed., Wiley–Interscience, Hoboken, NJ, 2006

  30. [30]

    T. S. Han, Nonnegative entropy measures of multivariate symmetric correlations,Information and Control,36(1978), 133–156

  31. [31]

    Watanabe, Information theoretical analysis of multivariate correlation,IBM Journal of Research and Development,4(1960), 66–82

    S. Watanabe, Information theoretical analysis of multivariate correlation,IBM Journal of Research and Development,4(1960), 66–82

  32. [32]

    R. L. Dobrushin, and S. B. Shlosman, Constructive criterion for the uniqueness of Gibbs fields, Statistical Physics and Dynamical Systems: Rigorous Results, Progress in Physics,10,347–370, Birkh¨ auser,Boston,1985

  33. [33]

    R. L. Dobrushin and S. B. Shlosman, ”Completely analytical interactions: constructive description,” Journal of Statistical Physics, 46(5–6), 983–1014 (1987)

  34. [34]

    R. W. Yeung,Information Theory and Network Coding, Springer, New York, 2008

  35. [35]

    Simon,The Statistical Mechanics of Lattice Gases, Volume I,Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993

    B. Simon,The Statistical Mechanics of Lattice Gases, Volume I,Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993

  36. [36]

    R. B. Israel,Convexity in the Theory of Lattice Gases,Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1979. 16

  37. [37]

    O. E. Lanford III, Entropy and equilibrium states in classical statistical mechanics, in: A. Lenard (ed.),Statistical Mechanics and Mathematical Problems, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 20, Springer– Verlag, Berlin, 1973,pp. 1–113

  38. [38]

    R. L. Dobrushin and S. B. Shlosman, Constructive criterion for the uniqueness of Gibbs fields,in:Statistical Physics and Dynamical Systems,Progress in Physics, Vol. 10,Birkh¨ auser, Boston, 1985, pp. 347–370

  39. [39]

    R. B. Griffiths, Peierls proof of spontaneous magnetization in a two-dimensional Ising ferromagnet, Physical Review,136(1964), A437–A439

  40. [40]

    C. M. Newman, Normal fluctuations and the FKG inequalities,Communications in Mathematical Physics,74(1980), 119–128

  41. [41]

    Penrose, Convergence of fugacity expansions for classical systems,in: T

    O. Penrose, Convergence of fugacity expansions for classical systems,in: T. A. Bak (ed.),Statistical Mechanics: Foundations and Applications, Benjamin, New York, 1967, pp. 101–109

  42. [42]

    Balian, From Microphysics to Macrophysics, Vols

    R. Balian, From Microphysics to Macrophysics, Vols. I–II, Springer–Verlag, Berlin, 1991

  43. [43]

    E. T. Jaynes. Information theory and statistical mechanics.Physical Review,106(1957), 620–630

  44. [44]

    E. T. Jaynes, Information theory and statistical mechanics II,Physical Review,108(1957), 171–190

  45. [45]

    Koutsoyiannis

    D. Koutsoyiannis. Physics of uncertainty, the Gibbs paradox and indistinguishable particles, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, 44 (4): 480–489, Bibcode:2013SHPMP..44..480K, doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.08.007

  46. [46]

    F. J. Pa˜ nos, E. P´ erez. Sackur–Tetrode equation in the lab. European Journal of Physics, 36 (5) 055033. A Simulation Plots Figure 1: The One-Particle Reduced Density f(1)(x, p).The heatmap shows, for each point ( x, p) in single-particle phase space, the density of probability of finding one particle at that location. For theideal gas, f(1) is perfectl...

  47. [47]

    The coarse-grained framework isconsistent with standard Gibbs statisticsin the fine-graining limit, with a controlledO(M −2) convergence rate (Plot 3)

  48. [48]

    The mesoscopic probabilities πi,α (Plot 2) are the natural objects for a reduced description, inheriting the structure off (1)(x, p) (Plot 1) while discarding sub-cell fluctuations

  49. [49]

    Short-range interactions guarantee exponential decay; long-range interactions produce algebraic decay and permanent non-additivity

    Entropy is additive—and thermodynamics is extensive—if and only if inter-cell mutual information decays fast enough (Plots 4–5). Short-range interactions guarantee exponential decay; long-range interactions produce algebraic decay and permanent non-additivity

  50. [50]

    The failure of extensivity for long-range interactions is not merely a correction: it is a qualitatively different regime visible as a risingS/Ncurve in Plot 6

  51. [51]

    This is a real, quantifiable effect connected to the cosmological backreaction problem

    Spatial averaging does not commute with nonlinear thermodynamic functionals (Plot 7). This is a real, quantifiable effect connected to the cosmological backreaction problem

  52. [52]

    extensive

    Surface corrections to the Euler relation vanish relative to bulk quantities in the thermodynamic limit (Plot 8), and they are physically distinct from bulk correlation corrections. The overall conclusion is thatextensivity is not a postulate: it is a derived consequence of microscopic stability, temperedness, and the exponential decay of correlations. Wh...