pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20907 · v1 · pith:NSHGNCS3new · submitted 2026-05-20 · 🪐 quant-ph

Symmetric dilations of Pauli channels and semigroups

Marco Cattaneo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 05:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords Pauli channelsStinespring dilationcovariancephase dampingdepolarizing channelquantum semigroupscollision modelsquantum simulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Covariance of Pauli channels constrains their Stinespring dilations to explicit forms.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the symmetry properties of Stinespring dilations for single-qubit Pauli channels, including phase damping and depolarizing examples. It derives how the Pauli group acts on the environment space and shows that this action, combined with covariance, restricts the dilation Hamiltonian and the environment's initial state. These restrictions are then used to construct explicit time-dependent dilations that are continuous and generated by time-independent Hamiltonians. The same constraints apply to collision models producing Pauli semigroups in the fast-collision limit. This matters for simulating open quantum systems on quantum computers using unitary operations.

Core claim

For Pauli channels, the requirement of covariance under the Pauli group leads to a specific representation of that group on the environment Hilbert space. This representation in turn forces the dilation Hamiltonian to have a particular structure and the initial environment state to be invariant under certain operations. As a result, explicit constructions of the time-dependent unitary dilations become possible for the generic Pauli channel as well as for the phase-damping and depolarizing channels. The constructions also cover the case of dynamical semigroups generated by collision models.

What carries the argument

The covariant representation of the Pauli group on the environment, which determines the allowed forms of the dilation Hamiltonian and initial state.

If this is right

  • Explicit time-dependent dilations can be constructed for phase damping channels.
  • Explicit constructions are available for depolarizing channels.
  • General Pauli channels admit similar symmetric dilations.
  • These dilations enable simulation of the channels via unitary evolution on quantum hardware.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such symmetric dilations may reduce the resources needed for simulating noise in quantum circuits by using fewer parameters.
  • The constructions could be implemented on a quantum processor to verify that the simulated evolution matches the target Pauli channel.
  • The symmetry approach might extend to channels with related group structures in higher dimensions.

Load-bearing premise

Stinespring dilations continuous in time and generated by a time-independent Hamiltonian exist for these channels, or that collision models produce Pauli semigroups in the fast-collision limit.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation for the depolarizing channel showing that no time-independent Hamiltonian and environment state satisfying the covariance can reproduce the channel dynamics at all times would disprove the claim.

read the original abstract

We explore the symmetry properties of Stinespring dilations of single-qubit Pauli channels, addressing both the generic case and the specific examples of phase damping and depolarizing channels. For each scenario, we derive the representation of the Pauli group acting on the Hilbert space of the environment. We then focus on dilations that are continuous in time and driven by a time-independent Hamiltonian, and on collision models that generate a Pauli dynamical semigroup in the limit of fast collisions. First, we complement some recent general results on these types of dilations (M. Cattaneo, Phys. Rev. A 111, 022209 (2025)) with some additions and clarifications, including the case of covariant channels with strongly conserved quantities. Next, we show that the covariance property of Pauli channels impose strong constraints on both the dilation Hamiltonian and the initial state of the environment, and demonstrate how these constraints can be exploited to explicitly construct the time-dependent dilations in all considered cases. Our results are relevant for the quantum simulation of Pauli channels via unitary dilations and of Pauli semigroups via collision models, both in the laboratory and on quantum computers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript explores symmetry properties of Stinespring dilations for single-qubit Pauli channels (generic case plus phase-damping and depolarizing examples). It derives the representation of the Pauli group on the environment Hilbert space, then constructs explicit time-continuous dilations generated by time-independent Hamiltonians and collision-model realizations of the corresponding Pauli semigroups, exploiting covariance to constrain both the Hamiltonian and the environment initial state. The work also supplies additions and clarifications to the author's prior general results on such dilations, including the case of covariant channels with strongly conserved quantities.

Significance. If the constructions are correct, the paper supplies concrete, usable forms for unitary dilations and fast-collision models of Pauli noise, which are directly relevant to quantum simulation on hardware and quantum computers. The explicit use of covariance constraints to fix the environment representation and Hamiltonian provides a useful illustration of how symmetry reduces the search space for dilations.

major comments (2)
  1. [complement to general results] § on complementing general results (covariant channels with strongly conserved quantities): the additions to the cited prior work (Phys. Rev. A 111, 022209) are not stated in a self-contained manner; a short recap of the general theorem being extended, followed by the precise new statement, is needed so that the constraint derivations can be checked without external reference.
  2. [explicit constructions] Construction of time-continuous dilations (generic Pauli channel): the claim that covariance fixes both the Hamiltonian and environment state is load-bearing, yet the manuscript does not include an explicit verification that the resulting time-dependent unitary reproduces the target Pauli channel for all t (e.g., via direct computation of the reduced dynamics or a check against the Kraus operators).
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the dilations are 'time-dependent' while the body emphasizes time-independent Hamiltonians; a single clarifying sentence would remove the apparent inconsistency.
  2. [environment representation] Notation for the environment representation (Pauli-group action) should be introduced once with a clear table or equation list so that the three cases (generic, phase-damping, depolarizing) can be compared at a glance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the detailed, constructive comments. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [complement to general results] § on complementing general results (covariant channels with strongly conserved quantities): the additions to the cited prior work (Phys. Rev. A 111, 022209) are not stated in a self-contained manner; a short recap of the general theorem being extended, followed by the precise new statement, is needed so that the constraint derivations can be checked without external reference.

    Authors: We agree that a self-contained recap would improve readability and verifiability. In the revised manuscript we have inserted a concise summary of the relevant general theorem on dilations of covariant channels from the cited work, followed immediately by the precise statement of our additions for the case of strongly conserved quantities. This allows the subsequent constraint derivations to be followed without external reference. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [explicit constructions] Construction of time-continuous dilations (generic Pauli channel): the claim that covariance fixes both the Hamiltonian and environment state is load-bearing, yet the manuscript does not include an explicit verification that the resulting time-dependent unitary reproduces the target Pauli channel for all t (e.g., via direct computation of the reduced dynamics or a check against the Kraus operators).

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit verification strengthens the presentation of this central claim. While the covariance constraints are used to determine the Hamiltonian and environment state, we have added in the revision a direct computation of the reduced dynamics generated by the time-dependent unitary for the generic Pauli channel. The calculation confirms agreement with the target channel for all times t and includes an explicit comparison with the Kraus operators. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; specific Pauli derivations are independent of self-cited general results

full rationale

The paper cites its own prior general results on time-continuous Stinespring dilations and collision models but explicitly states that it complements them with additions and clarifications, including for covariant channels with strongly conserved quantities. The load-bearing steps—deriving the Pauli-group representation on the environment and showing how covariance constrains the dilation Hamiltonian and initial environment state—are presented as new explicit constructions for the generic Pauli channel and the phase-damping/depolarizing cases. These steps do not reduce by definition or construction to the cited general results; they apply the framework to the specific symmetry properties of Pauli channels and produce concrete forms. No self-definitional, fitted-prediction, or uniqueness-imported patterns appear. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks for the Pauli-specific claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard quantum channel theory and the Stinespring theorem without introducing new free parameters or invented entities in the abstract; the key domain assumption is covariance of Pauli channels.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Stinespring dilation theorem applies to all quantum channels including Pauli channels.
    Invoked to guarantee existence of dilations whose symmetry properties are then analyzed.
  • domain assumption Pauli channels are covariant under the action of the Pauli group.
    This property is used to derive constraints on the dilation Hamiltonian and environment state.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5719 in / 1545 out tokens · 70026 ms · 2026-05-21T05:18:26.962669+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Trivial rotating phase in the group representation on the environment The representation on the state of the environment can be found by applying Eq. (8) to the covariance property 4 (13), after we define a corresponding time-dependent di- lation isometry through (with abuse of notation) V(t) =U I(t)|ψ E⟩.(17) For such a minimal dilation, Eq. (8) guarante...

    work page

  2. [2]

    weak” [28, 29]. The same concept can be easily extended to any compact Lie group, see for instance [51]. Here we focus instead on “strong symmetries

    Covariant channels with strongly conserved quantities To start with a simple example, let us consider a rep- resentation ofU(1) that can be written as πS(g) = exp(igJ), g∈R,(28) for some observableJonH S. It is well known that if a channelϕis covariant with respect to (28), then this does not imply thatJis a conserved quantity of the channel. For Markovia...

    work page

  3. [3]

    defining

    with⃗ σ= (σx, σy, σz)T , ρS = 1 2 (I2 +⃗ r·⃗ σ),(38) a Pauli channel acts on this state through an independent scaling of each component of the unit vector⃗ r. Specifi- cally (see Appendix A), ϕ[ρS] = 1 2 I2 + ⃗r′ ·⃗ σ ,(39) with r′ i =λ iri (40) and λx =p I +p x −p y −p z, λy =p I −p x +p y −p z, λz =p I −p x −p y +p z. (41) Analogously, aPauli dynamical...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Minimal dilation from Kraus decomposition First, we find a minimal Stinespring dilation of the phase damping channel using Eq. (6). As this channel has two Kraus operators only, we need a two-dimensional environment Hilbert space, i.e., a qubit. As a basis of HE, we choose{|1⟩,|0⟩}, with σz |1⟩=|1⟩, σ z |0⟩=− |0⟩.(47) We use the same canonical basis for t...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Pauli commutant

    Symmetric physical dilations We now focus on physical dilations of time-dependent phase damping channels driven by a time-independent HamiltonianH I, as given by Eqs. (10) and (12). In par- ticular, we letpof the phase-damping channel depend on time, so thatϕ PD p(t) has the structure in (45) with a vary- ingp(t) for allt≥0. Then, the relations (14) and (...

    work page

  6. [6]

    However, this is not a contradiction of the constraint in (14)

    Freedom in the physical dilation We observe that, for the phase damping channel, we can actually realize another physical dilation with the same Hamiltonian (57) and the initial state of the en- vironment|ψ E⟩=|0⟩instead of|1⟩in (53). However, this is not a contradiction of the constraint in (14). In fact, changing the initial state of the environment mea...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Our goal is to represent this dynamical semigroup through a collision model in the limit of fast collisions

    Dilations of the phase damping semigroup via collision models We conclude our analysis of the phase damping channel by studying the related semigroup LPD[ρ] =γ(σ zρσz −ρ).(65) 8 The semigroup generated by this Liouvillian is a phase damping channel for anyt≥0 (see Appendix A for de- tails). Our goal is to represent this dynamical semigroup through a colli...

    work page

  8. [8]

    We now have four jump operators, namelyK0 =√1−pI 2,K i = p p/3σi, fori=x, y, z

    Minimal dilation from Kraus representation We follow the same lines as for the phase damping channel. We now have four jump operators, namelyK0 =√1−pI 2,K i = p p/3σi, fori=x, y, z. This means that for a minimal dilation we need the environment Hilbert space of two qubits. Using the same convention for the bases of domain and codomain as for the phase dam...

    work page

  9. [9]

    First of all, we notice that both the trivial environment representations in the decomposition ofµE (Eq

    Symmetric physical dilations Next, we assume to deal with a time-dependent de- polarizing channelϕ dep p(t) with a probabilityp(t), and we look for physical dilations driven by a time-independent Hamiltonian as in (10). First of all, we notice that both the trivial environment representations in the decomposition ofµE (Eq. (81)) and πE (Eq. (76)) act on|1...

    work page

  10. [10]

    Generalitat de Catalunya

    Dilations of the depolarizing semigroup via collision models We conclude our discussion of the depolarizing chan- nel by considering depolarizing semigroups driven by the Liouvillian Ldep[ρ] =γ X i=x,y,z (σiρσi −ρ).(89) Our aim is to simulate this type of semigroups via fast- collision models. Following the discussion in Sec. IV A 4, we identify the three...

    work page doi:10.13039/501100011033

  11. [11]

    Representation on the Bloch sphere We first prove Eq. (39) using the properties of Pauli matrices, and in particular σiσjσi = 2σiδij −σ j.(A1) Given a Pauli channelϕandρ S from (38), ϕ[ρS] =pI I2 2 +p I X i ri 2 σi + X i pi I2 2 + X i,j pirj 2 σiσjσi = I2 2 +p I X i ri 2 σi + X j rj 2 2pj − X i pi ! σj = I2 2 + X i λiri 2 σi, (A2) whereλ i are given by (41)

    work page

  12. [12]

    (A3) In the above equation, we have used the anticommutative properties of the Pauli matrices: σiσj =η ijσjσi, η ij = ( 1 ifi=j, −1 ifi̸=j

    Covariance property Next, the covariance property of Pauli channels is sim- ply proven by observing that ϕ[σiρSσi] =p I σiρSσi + X j pjσjσiρSσiσj =p I σiρSσi + X j pjσiσjρSσjσi =σ iϕ[ρS]σi. (A3) In the above equation, we have used the anticommutative properties of the Pauli matrices: σiσj =η ijσjσi, η ij = ( 1 ifi=j, −1 ifi̸=j. (A4) 12

    work page

  13. [13]

    We notice L[I2] = 0,L[σ i] =−2 X j̸=i γjσi.(A5) Therefore, using Eq

    Pauli semigroups Finally, we prove that a Pauli semigroup as given by (42) is a Pauli channel for every timet. We notice L[I2] = 0,L[σ i] =−2 X j̸=i γjσi.(A5) Therefore, using Eq. (38) we obtain eLt[ρS] = 1 2 I2 + X i rie−2 P j̸=i γj tσi ! , (A6) and we immediately realize that a Pauli semigroup at timetis a Pauli channel that scales vectors on the Bloch ...

    work page

  14. [14]

    In the present discussion, we instead just re- quired a different orthonormal basis state of the environ- ment for each Lindblad operator

    a different ancillary qubit for each Lindblad operator is required. In the present discussion, we instead just re- quired a different orthonormal basis state of the environ- ment for each Lindblad operator. Then, this procedure may pave the way for a rigorous theory of minimal dila- tions of quantum dynamical semigroups via fast-collision models. 13

    work page

  15. [15]

    W. F. Stinespring, Positive Functions on C∗-Algebras, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society6, 211 (1955)

    work page 1955

  16. [16]

    Paulsen,Completely Bounded Maps and Operator Al- gebras(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003)

    V. Paulsen,Completely Bounded Maps and Operator Al- gebras(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003)

    work page 2003

  17. [17]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010)

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    J. T. Barreiro, M. M¨ uller, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, T. Monz, M. Chwalla, M. Hennrich, C. F. Roos, P. Zoller, and R. Blatt, An open-system quantum simulator with trapped ions, Nature470, 486 (2011)

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    Schindler, M

    P. Schindler, M. M¨ uller, D. Nigg, J. T. Barreiro, E. A. Martinez, M. Hennrich, T. Monz, S. Diehl, P. Zoller, and R. Blatt, Quantum simulation of dynamical maps with trapped ions, Nat. Phys.9, 361 (2013)

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    T. Xin, S. J. Wei, J. S. Pedernales, E. Solano, and G. L. Long, Quantum simulation of quantum channels in nuclear magnetic resonance, Phys. Rev. A96, 062303 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    J. Han, W. Cai, L. Hu, X. Mu, Y. Ma, Y. Xu, W. Wang, H. Wang, Y. P. Song, C.-L. Zou, and L. Sun, Experimen- tal Simulation of Open Quantum System Dynamics via Trotterization, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 020504 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    S.-j. Wei, T. Xin, and G.-l. Long, Efficient universal quan- tum channel simulation in IBM’s cloud quantum com- puter, Sci. China Phys. Mech.61, 70311 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Del Re, B

    L. Del Re, B. Rost, A. F. Kemper, and J. K. Freericks, Driven-dissipative quantum mechanics on a lattice: Sim- ulating a fermionic reservoir on a quantum computer, Phys. Rev. B102, 125112 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Garc´ ıa-P´ erez, M

    G. Garc´ ıa-P´ erez, M. A. C. Rossi, and S. Maniscalco, IBM Q Experience as a versatile experimental testbed for sim- ulating open quantum systems, npj Quantum Inf.6, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    I. J. David, I. Sinayskiy, and F. Petruccione, Digital simulation of convex mixtures of Markovian and non- Markovian single qubit Pauli channels on NISQ devices, EPJ Quantum Technol.11, 14 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Rivas and S

    A. Rivas and S. F. Huelga,Open quantum systems, Vol. 10 (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2012)

    work page 2012

  27. [27]

    Vacchini,Open Quantum Systems - Foundations and Theory(Springer, Cham, 2024)

    B. Vacchini,Open Quantum Systems - Foundations and Theory(Springer, Cham, 2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    vom Ende, Quantum-Dynamical Semigroups and the Church of the Larger Hilbert Space, Open Sys

    F. vom Ende, Quantum-Dynamical Semigroups and the Church of the Larger Hilbert Space, Open Sys. Info. Dyn. 30, 1 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Campbell and B

    S. Campbell and B. Vacchini, Collision models in open system dynamics: A versatile tool for deeper insights?, Europhys. Lett.133, 60001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Ciccarello, S

    F. Ciccarello, S. Lorenzo, V. Giovannetti, and G. M. Palma, Quantum collision models: Open system dynam- ics from repeated interactions, Phys. Rep.954, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Cattaneo, G

    M. Cattaneo, G. L. Giorgi, R. Zambrini, and S. Manis- calco, A Brief Journey through Collision Models for Mul- tipartite Open Quantum Dynamics, Open Sys. Info. Dyn. 29, 2250015 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Cusumano, Quantum Collision Models: A Beginner Guide, Entropy24, 1258 (2022)

    S. Cusumano, Quantum Collision Models: A Beginner Guide, Entropy24, 1258 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Lacroix, D

    T. Lacroix, D. Cilluffo, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Making quantum collision models exact, Commun. Phys. 8, 268 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Cattaneo, G

    M. Cattaneo, G. De Chiara, S. Maniscalco, R. Zambrini, and G. L. Giorgi, Collision Models Can Efficiently Sim- ulate Any Multipartite Markovian Quantum Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 130403 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Burger, L

    A. Burger, L. C. Kwek, and D. Poletti, Digital Quantum Simulation of the Spin-Boson Model under Markovian Open-System Dynamics, Entropy24, 1766 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Erbanni, X

    R. Erbanni, X. Xu, T. F. Demarie, and D. Poletti, Sim- ulating quantum transport via collisional models on a digital quantum computer, Phys. Rev. A108, 032619 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Cattaneo, M

    M. Cattaneo, M. A. Rossi, G. Garc´ ıa-P´ erez, R. Zambrini, and S. Maniscalco, Quantum Simulation of Dissipative Collective Effects on Noisy Quantum Computers, PRX Quantum4, 010324 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Vacchini, Covariant mappings for the description of measurement, dissipation and decoherence in quantum mechanics, inTheoretical Foundations of Quantum Info

    B. Vacchini, Covariant mappings for the description of measurement, dissipation and decoherence in quantum mechanics, inTheoretical Foundations of Quantum Info. Process. and Communication: Selected Topics, edited by E. Br¨ uning and F. Petruccione (Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010) pp. 39–77

    work page 2010

  39. [39]

    Memarzadeh and B

    L. Memarzadeh and B. C. Sanders, Group-covariant ex- treme and quasiextreme channels, Phys. Rev. Research 4, 033206 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Holevo, A note on covariant dynamical semigroups, Rep

    A. Holevo, A note on covariant dynamical semigroups, Rep. Math. Phys.32, 211 (1993)

    work page 1993

  41. [41]

    A. S. Holevo, Covariant quantum Markovian evolutions, J. Math. Phys.37, 1812 (1996)

    work page 1996

  42. [42]

    Buˇ ca and T

    B. Buˇ ca and T. Prosen, A note on symmetry reductions of the Lindblad equation: transport in constrained open spin chains, New J. Phys.14, 073007 (2012)

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    V. V. Albert and L. Jiang, Symmetries and conserved quantities in Lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022118 (2014)

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    Bengtsson and K

    I. Bengtsson and K. Zyczkowski,Geometry of Quantum States - An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement, 2nd Edition(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Poshtvan and V

    A. Poshtvan and V. Karimipour, Capacities of the co- variant Pauli channel, Phys. Rev. A106, 062408 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    J. J. Wallman and J. Emerson, Noise tailoring for scalable quantum computation via randomized compiling, Phys. Rev. A94, 052325 (2016)

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    S. T. Flammia and J. J. Wallman, Efficient Estimation of Pauli Channels, ACM Trans. Quantum Comput.1, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Chen,Topics in Pauli channel learning: quantum advantages, quantum noise characterization, and quan- tum error mitigation, Ph.D

    S. Chen,Topics in Pauli channel learning: quantum advantages, quantum noise characterization, and quan- tum error mitigation, Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Guti´ errez and K

    M. Guti´ errez and K. R. Brown, Comparison of a quan- tum error-correction threshold for exact and approximate errors, Phys. Rev. A91, 022335 (2015)

    work page 2015

  50. [50]

    Wagner, H

    T. Wagner, H. Kampermann, D. Bruß, and M. Kliesch, Pauli channels can be estimated from syndrome mea- surements in quantum error correction, Quantum6, 809 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Basile and C

    T. Basile and C. Pineda, Quantum simulation of Pauli channels and dynamical maps: Algorithm and implemen- tation, PLOS ONE19, e0297210 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Scutaru, Some remarks on covariant completely pos- itive linear maps onC ∗-algebras, Rep

    H. Scutaru, Some remarks on covariant completely pos- itive linear maps onC ∗-algebras, Rep. Math. Phys.16, 14 79 (1979)

    work page 1979

  53. [53]

    Keyl and R

    M. Keyl and R. F. Werner, Optimal cloning of pure states, testing single clones, J. Math. Phys.40, 3283 (1999)

    work page 1999

  54. [54]

    Marvian Mashhad,Symmetry, Asymmetry and Quan- tum Information, Ph.D

    I. Marvian Mashhad,Symmetry, Asymmetry and Quan- tum Information, Ph.D. thesis, University of Waterloo (2012)

    work page 2012

  55. [55]

    Faist, M

    P. Faist, M. Berta, and F. G. S. L. Brandao, Thermody- namic Implementations of Quantum Processes, Commun. Math. Phys.384, 1709 (2021)

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    Pucha la, L

    Z. Pucha la, L. Rudnicki, and K. ˙Zyczkowski, Pauli semi- groups and unistochastic quantum channels, Phys. Lett. A383, 2376 (2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    Jagadish, R

    V. Jagadish, R. Srikanth, and F. Petruccione, Convex combinations of pauli semigroups: Geometry, measure, and an application, Phys. Rev. A101, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Chru´ sci´ nski, G

    D. Chru´ sci´ nski, G. Kimura, and F. Mukhamedov, Uni- versal constraint for relaxation rates of semigroups of qubit Schwarz maps, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.57, 185302 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    Cattaneo, Strong symmetries in collision models and physical dilations of covariant quantum maps, Phys

    M. Cattaneo, Strong symmetries in collision models and physical dilations of covariant quantum maps, Phys. Rev. A111, 022209 (2025)

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    Ur Rehman, H

    J. Ur Rehman, H. Al-Hraishawi, T. Q. Duong, S. Chatzinotas, and H. Shin, On Estimating Time- Varying Pauli Noise, IEEE Trans. Commun.72, 2079 (2024)

    work page 2079

  61. [61]

    Acevedo and A

    A. Acevedo and A. Falc´ o, Geometric Complexity of Quantum Channels via Unitary Dilations (2026), 2601.00735 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  62. [62]

    Caruso, V

    F. Caruso, V. Giovannetti, and A. S. Holevo, One-mode bosonic Gaussian channels: A full weak-degradability classification, New J. Phys.8(2006)

    work page 2006

  63. [63]

    Watrous,The Theory of Quantum Information(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018)

    J. Watrous,The Theory of Quantum Information(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018)

    work page 2018

  64. [64]

    Lancien and A

    C. Lancien and A. Winter, Approximating quantum channels by completely positive maps with small Kraus rank, Quantum8, 1320 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    Marvian and R

    I. Marvian and R. W. Spekkens, Extending Noether’s theorem by quantifying the asymmetry of quantum states, Nat. Commun.5, 3821 (2014)

    work page 2014

  66. [66]

    Y. Li, F. Pollmann, N. Read, and P. Sala, Highly Entan- gled Stationary States from Strong Symmetries, Phys. Rev. X15, 011068 (2025)

    work page 2025

  67. [67]

    Cattaneo,Pauli dilations: A notebook for the characterization of symmetries in physical dilations of Pauli channels,https://github.com/MarcoCattaneo/ Pauli_dilations(2026)

    M. Cattaneo,Pauli dilations: A notebook for the characterization of symmetries in physical dilations of Pauli channels,https://github.com/MarcoCattaneo/ Pauli_dilations(2026)

    work page 2026

  68. [68]

    J. A. de Leon, A. Fonseca, F. Leyvraz, D. Davalos, and C. Pineda, Pauli component erasing quantum channels, Phys. Rev. A106, 042604 (2022)

    work page 2022

  69. [69]

    Datta, M

    N. Datta, M. Fukuda, and A. S. Holevo, Complemen- tarity and Additivity for Covariant Channels, Quantum Info. Process.5, 179 (2006)

    work page 2006

  70. [70]

    G. G. Amosov, On Weyl channels being covariant with respect to the maximum commutative group of unitaries, J. Math. Phys.48, 012104 (2007)

    work page 2007

  71. [71]

    Nathanson and M

    M. Nathanson and M. B. Ruskai, Pauli diagonal chan- nels constant on axes, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.40, 8171 (2007)

    work page 2007

  72. [72]

    Siudzi´ nska and D

    K. Siudzi´ nska and D. Chru´ sci´ nski, Quantum channels ir- reducibly covariant with respect to the finite group gen- erated by the Weyl operators, J. Math. Phys.59, 033508 (2018)

    work page 2018

  73. [73]

    Siudzi´ nska, Geometry of generalized Pauli channels, Phys

    K. Siudzi´ nska, Geometry of generalized Pauli channels, Phys. Rev. A101, 062323 (2020)

    work page 2020

  74. [74]

    Basile, J

    T. Basile, J. A. de Leon, A. Fonseca, F. Leyvraz, and C. Pineda, Weyl channels for multipartite systems, Phys. Rev. A109, 032607 (2024)

    work page 2024

  75. [75]

    Chru´ sci´ nski, B

    D. Chru´ sci´ nski, B. Bhattacharya, and S. Patra, Symme- tries of Multipartite Weyl Quantum Channels, Symmetry 17, 943 (2025)

    work page 2025