pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.24085 · v1 · pith:Q4VIQVUPnew · submitted 2026-05-22 · ✦ hep-th

Finite scalar field theory with SU(1,1) spacetime symmetry from near-BPS limits of mathcal{N}=4 SYM

Roberto Auzzi , Stefano Baiguera , Lihan Guo , Troels Harmark , Giuseppe Nardelli This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 15:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords scalar field theorySU(1,1) symmetrynear-BPS limitN=4 SYMnon-renormalization theoremfinite theorySpin Matrix theorynon-Lorentzian QFT
0
0 comments X

The pith

A scalar field theory from a near-BPS limit of N=4 SYM is finite at all orders in perturbation theory.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper derives an interacting matrix-valued scalar quantum field theory by taking a near-BPS decoupling limit of N=4 super Yang-Mills. The resulting theory is non-Lorentzian, carries SU(1,1) spacetime symmetry, and can be written with a semi-local action whose interaction term comes from a non-abelian gauge field that carries no propagating degrees of freedom. The authors first establish that the classical action is invariant under SU(1,1) off shell. They then prove that the theory receives no divergent corrections at any order in perturbation theory, yielding a non-renormalization theorem. A sympathetic reader cares because such theorems are rare outside supersymmetric or Lorentz-invariant settings.

Core claim

The field theory that arises from the near-BPS decoupling limit of N=4 SYM is quantum-mechanically equivalent to SU(1,1) Spin Matrix theory; its classical action is off-shell invariant under the full SU(1,1) symmetry group, and its renormalization properties establish that the theory is finite at every perturbative order, thereby realizing a non-renormalization theorem in a non-supersymmetric and non-Lorentzian context.

What carries the argument

The classical action of the matrix-valued scalar theory with SU(1,1) symmetry, which encodes the interaction arising from a non-propagating non-abelian gauge field and enforces off-shell invariance together with perturbative finiteness.

If this is right

  • The classical equivalence to SU(1,1) Spin Matrix theory extends to the quantum level.
  • The SU(1,1) off-shell invariance protects all correlation functions from perturbative divergences.
  • Renormalization-group flow is absent; the theory remains finite without counterterms at any order.
  • The non-renormalization result holds without supersymmetry or Lorentz invariance.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Analogous decoupling limits applied to other BPS sectors might generate additional finite non-supersymmetric models with reduced spacetime symmetry.
  • The specific form of the interaction term, inherited from the gauge field without propagation, may be the minimal ingredient needed to cancel divergences once the symmetry is imposed.
  • One could test the result by repeating the perturbative analysis in a cutoff regularization rather than dimensional regularization to check scheme independence.

Load-bearing premise

The near-BPS decoupling limit produces a self-contained quantum field theory whose renormalization is completely determined by the classical action without leftover effects from the parent N=4 SYM.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of a two-loop or higher Feynman diagram in the theory that yields a nonzero divergent contribution would falsify the finiteness claim.

read the original abstract

In this work, we consider an interacting and matrix-valued scalar quantum field theory that emerges from a near-BPS decoupling limit of $\mathcal{N}=4$ super Yang-Mills. The theory is non-Lorentzian with SU(1,1) spacetime symmetry and admits a (semi-)local action formulation. The interaction can be viewed as arising from a non-abelian gauge field without propagating degrees of freedom. The proposed field theory action has previously been considered as classically equivalent to SU(1,1) Spin Matrix theory. In this work, we examine this equivalence at the quantum level. We show that the classical action is off-shell invariant under the SU(1,1) symmetry group. We then analyze the renormalization properties, showing the theory is finite at all orders in perturbation theory. This provides a rare example of a non-supersymmetric and non-Lorentzian quantum field theory where a non-renormalization theorem holds.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs an interacting matrix-valued scalar QFT with SU(1,1) spacetime symmetry via a near-BPS decoupling limit of N=4 SYM. It presents a (semi-)local action, demonstrates off-shell SU(1,1) invariance of the classical action, examines the quantum-level equivalence to SU(1,1) Spin Matrix theory, and concludes that the theory is finite to all orders in perturbation theory, furnishing a non-supersymmetric, non-Lorentzian example of a non-renormalization theorem.

Significance. If the finiteness result holds after the decoupling limit is shown to commute with renormalization, the work would be significant: it supplies a concrete, interacting example of an all-order finite QFT outside the usual supersymmetric or Lorentz-invariant settings, with potential implications for understanding symmetry-protected finiteness mechanisms. The explicit off-shell invariance proof and the quantum equivalence check are positive features.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; renormalization analysis section] The central all-order finiteness claim rests on the assumption that the near-BPS limit produces a standalone QFT whose perturbative divergences are completely captured by the given semi-local action and its SU(1,1) invariance. No explicit verification is supplied that the limit commutes with renormalization (e.g., via diagram-by-diagram matching to the parent N=4 SYM or power-counting that accounts for possible residual UV operators from the parent theory). This is load-bearing for the non-renormalization theorem and must be addressed before the claim can be accepted.
  2. [Renormalization properties section] The renormalization analysis concludes finiteness at all orders, yet the manuscript does not provide the explicit Feynman rules, counterterm analysis, or power-counting argument that would establish the absence of divergences order by order. Without these, the step from off-shell invariance to all-order finiteness remains unverified.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Action formulation] Clarify the precise definition of the (semi-)local action and the range of the matrix indices in the interaction term to aid reproducibility of the Feynman rules.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and outline the revisions we plan to make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract; renormalization analysis section] The central all-order finiteness claim rests on the assumption that the near-BPS limit produces a standalone QFT whose perturbative divergences are completely captured by the given semi-local action and its SU(1,1) invariance. No explicit verification is supplied that the limit commutes with renormalization (e.g., via diagram-by-diagram matching to the parent N=4 SYM or power-counting that accounts for possible residual UV operators from the parent theory). This is load-bearing for the non-renormalization theorem and must be addressed before the claim can be accepted.

    Authors: We agree that demonstrating the commutation of the near-BPS limit with renormalization is important for rigorously establishing the finiteness. In our approach, the limit is taken on the classical action, yielding a theory whose quantum properties are then analyzed separately. The SU(1,1) invariance is preserved in the limit. To strengthen this, we will add a discussion in the renormalization section explaining that the BPS scaling eliminates operators that could lead to residual divergences, as they would violate the near-BPS condition. We will also note that the quantum equivalence to SU(1,1) Spin Matrix theory, which we verify, supports that no additional UV structures arise. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Renormalization properties section] The renormalization analysis concludes finiteness at all orders, yet the manuscript does not provide the explicit Feynman rules, counterterm analysis, or power-counting argument that would establish the absence of divergences order by order. Without these, the step from off-shell invariance to all-order finiteness remains unverified.

    Authors: The manuscript's renormalization analysis uses the off-shell SU(1,1) invariance to constrain possible counterterms, arguing that the only invariant operators are finite due to the non-Lorentzian nature and the specific interaction structure. However, we acknowledge that making the power-counting and Feynman rules explicit would improve clarity. We will include these in a revised version, adding an appendix with the Feynman rules derived from the semi-local action and a power-counting argument showing that divergences are absent at each order due to the symmetry. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation from external limit and independent renormalization analysis

full rationale

The theory is constructed via an external near-BPS decoupling limit of N=4 SYM. The paper then demonstrates off-shell SU(1,1) invariance of the given action and performs a separate renormalization analysis to establish all-order finiteness. Quantum equivalence to Spin Matrix theory is checked rather than presupposed. No quoted step reduces by definition to its inputs, renames a fit as a prediction, or relies on a load-bearing self-citation chain whose content is unverified outside the present work. The non-renormalization claim rests on symmetry-based power counting that is independent of the construction details.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the near-BPS decoupling limit producing a valid QFT whose quantum properties follow from the classical action; no free parameters, invented entities, or additional axioms beyond standard QFT are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The near-BPS decoupling limit of N=4 SYM yields a well-defined interacting scalar theory with SU(1,1) symmetry whose renormalization is captured by the classical action.
    This is the foundational premise stated in the abstract from which the finiteness result follows.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5717 in / 1321 out tokens · 35474 ms · 2026-06-30T15:21:14.393930+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages · 45 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J. M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Int. J. Theor. Phys.38(1999) 1113 [hep-th/9711200]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  2. [2]

    Decoupling limits of N=4 super Yang-Mills on R x S^3

    T. Harmark, K. R. Kristjansson and M. Orselli,Decoupling limits ofN= 4super Yang-Mills onR×S 3,JHEP09(2007) 115 [0707.1621]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  3. [3]

    Spin Matrix Theory: A quantum mechanical model of the AdS/CFT correspondence

    T. Harmark and M. Orselli,Spin Matrix Theory: A quantum mechanical model of the AdS/CFT correspondence,JHEP11(2014) 134 [1409.4417]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  4. [4]

    An Index for 4 dimensional Super Conformal Theories

    J. Kinney, J. M. Maldacena, S. Minwalla and S. Raju,An Index for 4 dimensional super conformal theories,Commun. Math. Phys.275(2007) 209 [hep-th/0510251]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  5. [5]

    Interacting Giant Gravitons from Spin Matrix Theory

    T. Harmark,Interacting Giant Gravitons from Spin Matrix Theory,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 066001 [1606.06296]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    Non-Relativistic Strings and Limits of the AdS/CFT Correspondence

    T. Harmark, J. Hartong and N. A. Obers,Nonrelativistic strings and limits of the AdS/CFT correspondence,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 086019 [1705.03535]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    Strings with Non-Relativistic Conformal Symmetry and Limits of the AdS/CFT Correspondence

    T. Harmark, J. Hartong, L. Menculini, N. A. Obers and Z. Yan,Strings with Non-Relativistic Conformal Symmetry and Limits of the AdS/CFT Correspondence,JHEP 11(2018) 190 [1810.05560]. – 39 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Harmark, J

    T. Harmark, J. Hartong, L. Menculini, N. A. Obers and G. Oling,Relating non-relativistic string theories,JHEP11(2019) 071 [1907.01663]

    work page arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    Harmark and N

    T. Harmark and N. Wintergerst,Nonrelativistic Corners ofN= 4Supersymmetric Yang–Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 171602 [1912.05554]

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    Baiguera, T

    S. Baiguera, T. Harmark and N. Wintergerst,Nonrelativistic near-BPS corners ofN= 4 super-Yang-Mills withSU(1,1)symmetry,JHEP02(2021) 188 [2009.03799]

    work page arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Harmark, J

    T. Harmark, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers and G. Oling,Spin Matrix Theory String Backgrounds and Penrose Limits of AdS/CFT,JHEP03(2021) 129 [2011.02539]

    work page arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Baiguera, T

    S. Baiguera, T. Harmark, Y. Lei and N. Wintergerst,Symmetry structure of the interactions in near-BPS corners ofN= 4super-Yang-Mills,JHEP04(2021) 029 [2012.08532]

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Baiguera, T

    S. Baiguera, T. Harmark and Y. Lei,Spin Matrix Theory in near 1 8-BPS corners ofN= 4 super-Yang-Mills,JHEP02(2022) 191 [2111.10149]

    work page arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    Baiguera, T

    S. Baiguera, T. Harmark and Y. Lei,The Panorama of Spin Matrix theory,JHEP04(2023) 075 [2211.16519]

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Oling and Z

    G. Oling and Z. Yan,Aspects of Nonrelativistic Strings,Front. in Phys.10(2022) 832271 [2202.12698]

    work page arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Baiguera,Aspects of non-relativistic quantum field theories,Eur

    S. Baiguera,Aspects of non-relativistic quantum field theories,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 268 [2311.00027]

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Bidussi, T

    L. Bidussi, T. Harmark, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers and G. Oling,Longitudinal Galilean and Carrollian limits of non-relativistic strings,JHEP12(2023) 141 [2309.14467]

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Demulder, S

    S. Demulder, S. Driezen, B. Knighton, G. Oling, A. L. Retore, F. K. Seibold et al.,Exact approaches on the string worldsheet,J. Phys. A57(2024) 423001 [2312.12930]

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    C. D. A. Blair, J. Lahnsteiner, N. A. J. Obers and Z. Yan,Unification of Decoupling Limits in String and M Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 161603 [2311.10564]

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    C. D. A. Blair, J. Lahnsteiner, N. A. Obers and Z. Yan,Matrix Theory Reloaded: A BPS Road to Holography,2410.03591

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    Baiguera, T

    S. Baiguera, T. Harmark, Y. Lei and Z. Yan,Conformal mapping of non-Lorentzian geometries in SU(1, 2) Conformal Field Theory,JHEP03(2025) 100 [2411.11951]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Matching the Hagedorn temperature in AdS/CFT

    T. Harmark and M. Orselli,Matching the Hagedorn temperature in AdS/CFT,Phys. Rev. D 74(2006) 126009 [hep-th/0608115]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  23. [23]

    Magnetic Heisenberg-chain/pp-wave correspondence

    T. Harmark, K. R. Kristjansson and M. Orselli,Magnetic Heisenberg-chain/pp-wave correspondence,JHEP02(2007) 085 [hep-th/0611242]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  24. [24]

    Matching gauge theory and string theory in a decoupling limit of AdS/CFT

    T. Harmark, K. R. Kristjansson and M. Orselli,Matching gauge theory and string theory in a decoupling limit of AdS/CFT,JHEP02(2009) 027 [0806.3370]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  25. [25]

    Spin chains and string theory

    M. Kruczenski,Spin chains and string theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.93(2004) 161602 [hep-th/0311203]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  26. [26]

    Bethe Ansatz in Stringy Sigma Models

    T. Klose and K. Zarembo,Bethe ansatz in stringy sigma models,J. Stat. Mech.0605(2006) P05006 [hep-th/0603039]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  27. [27]

    J. A. Minahan and K. Zarembo,The Bethe ansatz for N=4 superYang-Mills,JHEP03 (2003) 013 [hep-th/0212208]. – 40 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  28. [28]

    The Complete One-Loop Dilatation Operator of N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory

    N. Beisert,The complete one loop dilatation operator of N=4 superYang-Mills theory,Nucl. Phys. B676(2004) 3 [hep-th/0307015]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  29. [29]

    The Dilatation Operator of Conformal N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory

    N. Beisert, C. Kristjansen and M. Staudacher,The Dilatation operator of conformal N=4 superYang-Mills theory,Nucl. Phys. B664(2003) 131 [hep-th/0303060]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  30. [30]

    The su(2|3) Dynamic Spin Chain

    N. Beisert,The su(2—3) dynamic spin chain,Nucl. Phys. B682(2004) 487 [hep-th/0310252]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  31. [31]

    The Dilatation Operator of N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory and Integrability

    N. Beisert,The Dilatation operator of N=4 super Yang-Mills theory and integrability,Phys. Rept.405(2004) 1 [hep-th/0407277]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  32. [32]

    V. A. Kazakov, A. Marshakov, J. A. Minahan and K. Zarembo,Classical/quantum integrability in AdS/CFT,JHEP05(2004) 024 [hep-th/0402207]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  33. [33]

    On Symmetry Enhancement in the psu(1,1|2) Sector of N=4 SYM

    N. Beisert and B. I. Zwiebel,On Symmetry Enhancement in the psu(1,1—2) Sector of N=4 SYM,JHEP10(2007) 031 [0707.1031]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  34. [34]

    J. A. Minahan,Review of AdS/CFT Integrability, Chapter I.1: Spin Chains in N=4 Super Yang-Mills,Lett. Math. Phys.99(2012) 33 [1012.3983]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  35. [35]

    Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview

    N. Beisert et al.,Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview,Lett. Math. Phys.99 (2012) 3 [1012.3982]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  36. [36]

    Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops

    V. Pestun,Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops, Commun. Math. Phys.313(2012) 71 [0712.2824]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  37. [37]

    Black hole microstates in AdS$_4$ from supersymmetric localization

    F. Benini, K. Hristov and A. Zaffaroni,Black hole microstates in AdS 4 from supersymmetric localization,JHEP05(2016) 054 [1511.04085]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    Localization techniques in quantum field theories

    V. Pestun et al.,Localization techniques in quantum field theories,J. Phys. A50(2017) 440301 [1608.02952]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [39]

    S. M. Hosseini, K. Hristov and A. Zaffaroni,An extremization principle for the entropy of rotating BPS black holes in AdS 5,JHEP07(2017) 106 [1705.05383]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [40]

    Cabo-Bizet, D

    A. Cabo-Bizet, D. Cassani, D. Martelli and S. Murthy,Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of supersymmetric AdS 5 black holes,JHEP10(2019) 062 [1810.11442]

    work page arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    S. Choi, J. Kim, S. Kim and J. Nahmgoong,Large AdS black holes from QFT,1810.12067

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    Benini and P

    F. Benini and P. Milan,Black Holes in 4DN=4 Super-Yang-Mills Field Theory,Phys. Rev. X10(2020) 021037 [1812.09613]

    work page arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    Zaffaroni,AdS black holes, holography and localization,Living Rev

    A. Zaffaroni,AdS black holes, holography and localization,Living Rev. Rel.23(2020) 2 [1902.07176]

    work page arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Goldstein, V

    K. Goldstein, V. Jejjala, Y. Lei, S. van Leuven and W. Li,Residues, modularity, and the Cardy limit of the 4dN= 4 superconformal index,JHEP04(2021) 216 [2011.06605]

    work page arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    Lambert, R

    N. Lambert, R. Mouland and T. Orchard,Non-Lorentzian SU(1, n) Spacetime Symmetry In Various Dimensions,Front. in Phys.10(2022) 864800 [2112.14860]

    work page arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    Smith,Fermions with SU(1, n) spacetime symmetry,JHEP11(2023) 032 [2307.16624]

    J. Smith,Fermions with SU(1, n) spacetime symmetry,JHEP11(2023) 032 [2307.16624]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Lei and D

    Y. Lei and D. Zhang,Notes on su(1,2)⊕u(1) Chern–Simons theory and torsional Newton–Cartan gravity,J. Phys. A58(2025) 365401 [2505.03322]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    The su(2)_{-1/2} WZW model and the beta-gamma system

    F. Lesage, P. Mathieu, J. Rasmussen and H. Saleur,The su (hat)(2)(-1/2) WZW model and the beta gamma system,Nucl. Phys. B647(2002) 363 [hep-th/0207201]. – 41 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  49. [49]

    Warped AdS_3 Black Holes

    D. Anninos, W. Li, M. Padi, W. Song and A. Strominger,Warped AdS(3) Black Holes, JHEP03(2009) 130 [0807.3040]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  50. [50]

    Warped Conformal Field Theory

    S. Detournay, T. Hartman and D. M. Hofman,Warped Conformal Field Theory,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 124018 [1210.0539]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  51. [51]

    D. M. Hofman and B. Rollier,Warped Conformal Field Theory as Lower Spin Gravity,Nucl. Phys. B897(2015) 1 [1411.0672]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  52. [52]

    Entanglement Entropy in Warped Conformal Field Theories

    A. Castro, D. M. Hofman and N. Iqbal,Entanglement Entropy in Warped Conformal Field Theories,JHEP02(2016) 033 [1511.00707]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  53. [53]

    Warped Weyl fermion partition functions

    A. Castro, D. M. Hofman and G. S´ arosi,Warped Weyl fermion partition functions,JHEP11 (2015) 129 [1508.06302]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  54. [54]

    Near-Horizon Geometry and Warped Conformal Symmetry

    H. Afshar, S. Detournay, D. Grumiller and B. Oblak,Near-Horizon Geometry and Warped Conformal Symmetry,JHEP03(2016) 187 [1512.08233]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  55. [55]

    An integrable Lorentz-breaking deformation of two-dimensional CFTs

    M. Guica,An integrable Lorentz-breaking deformation of two-dimensional CFTs,SciPost Phys.5(2018) 048 [1710.08415]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  56. [56]

    Locality and anomalies in warped conformal field theory

    K. Jensen,Locality and anomalies in warped conformal field theory,JHEP12(2017) 111 [1710.11626]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    Le Bellac and J

    M. Le Bellac and J. M. L´ evy-Leblond,Galilean electromagnetism,Nuovo Cim. B14(1973) 217

    1973

  58. [58]

    Galilean covariant lagrangian models

    E. S. Santos, M. de Montigny, F. C. Khanna and A. E. Santana, “Galilean covariant lagrangian models.” 10.1088/0305-4470/37/41/011

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/37/41/011

  59. [59]

    Symmetries and Couplings of Non-Relativistic Electrodynamics

    G. Festuccia, D. Hansen, J. Hartong and N. A. Obers,Symmetries and Couplings of Non-Relativistic Electrodynamics,JHEP11(2016) 037 [1607.01753]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  60. [60]

    Mehra and Y

    A. Mehra and Y. Sanghavi,Galilean electrodynamics: covariant formulation and Lagrangian, JHEP09(2021) 078 [2107.08525]

    work page arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    Bagchi, R

    A. Bagchi, R. Basu, M. Islam, K. S. Kolekar and A. Mehra,Galilean gauge theories from null reductions,JHEP04(2022) 176 [2201.12629]

    work page arXiv 2022

  62. [62]

    Chapman, L

    S. Chapman, L. Di Pietro, K. T. Grosvenor and Z. Yan,Renormalization of Galilean Electrodynamics,JHEP10(2020) 195 [2007.03033]

    work page arXiv 2020

  63. [63]

    Baiguera, L

    S. Baiguera, L. Cederle and S. Penati,Supersymmetric Galilean Electrodynamics,JHEP09 (2022) 237 [2207.06435]

    work page arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    J. B. Gutowski and H. S. Reall,General supersymmetricAdS 5 black holes,JHEP04(2004) 048 [hep-th/0401129]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  65. [65]

    H. K. Kunduri, J. Lucietti and H. S. Reall,Supersymmetric multi-charge AdS(5) black holes, JHEP04(2006) 036 [hep-th/0601156]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  66. [66]

    Ammon and J

    M. Ammon and J. Erdmenger,Gauge/gravity duality: Foundations and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 4, 2015, 10.1017/CBO9780511846373

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511846373 2015

  67. [67]

    C. Beem, M. Lemos, P. Liendo, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli and B. C. van Rees,Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys.336(2015) 1359 [1312.5344]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  68. [68]

    Srednicki,Quantum field theory

    M. Srednicki,Quantum field theory. Cambridge University Press, 1, 2007, 10.1017/CBO9780511813917. – 42 –

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813917 2007

  69. [69]

    M. D. Schwartz,Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model. Cambridge University Press, 3, 2014

    2014

  70. [70]

    Bergman,Nonrelativistic field theoretic scale anomaly,Phys

    O. Bergman,Nonrelativistic field theoretic scale anomaly,Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 5474

    1992

  71. [71]

    N=4 SYM on R x S^3 and Theories with 16 Supercharges

    G. Ishiki, Y. Takayama and A. Tsuchiya,N= 4SYM onR×S 3 and theories with 16 supercharges,JHEP10(2006) 007 [hep-th/0605163]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  72. [72]

    Renormalization properties of a Galilean Wess-Zumino model

    R. Auzzi, S. Baiguera, G. Nardelli and S. Penati,Renormalization properties of a Galilean Wess-Zumino model,JHEP06(2019) 048 [1904.08404]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  73. [73]

    I. Arav, Y. Oz and A. Raviv-Moshe,Holomorphic Structure and Quantum Critical Points in Supersymmetric Lifshitz Field Theories,JHEP11(2019) 064 [1908.03220]

    work page arXiv 2019

  74. [74]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,An Introduction to quantum field theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995, 10.1201/9780429503559

    work page doi:10.1201/9780429503559 1995

  75. [75]

    1/16 BPS States in N=4 SYM

    C.-M. Chang and X. Yin,1/16 BPS states inN=4 super-Yang-Mills theory,Phys. Rev. D 88(2013) 106005 [1305.6314]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  76. [76]

    Chang and Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin,Words to describe a black hole,JHEP02(2023) 109 [2209.06728]

    work page arXiv 2023

  77. [77]

    S. Choi, S. Kim, E. Lee and J. Park,The shape of non-graviton operators for SU(2),JHEP 09(2024) 029 [2209.12696]

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    S. Choi, S. Kim, E. Lee, S. Lee and J. Park,Towards quantum black hole microstates,JHEP 11(2023) 175 [2304.10155]

    work page arXiv 2023

  79. [79]

    J. Choi, S. Choi, S. Kim, J. Lee and S. Lee,FiniteNblack hole cohomologies,2312.16443

    work page arXiv

  80. [80]

    Chang and Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin,Holographic covering and the fortuity of black holes, 2402.10129

    work page arXiv

Showing first 80 references.