pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.24122 · v1 · pith:HYPH66ABnew · submitted 2026-05-22 · 🪐 quant-ph

Phase-resolved multichannel quantum escape between limit cycles

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 15:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum escapelimit cyclesoptomechanical resonatorquantum jumpsmetastabilitydriven-dissipative systemsphase resolutionactivation scaling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum escape from small-amplitude limit cycles follows a single radial corridor while large-amplitude cycles use multiple phase-localized paths.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that in a driven optomechanical resonator, two coexisting limit cycles become metastable under quantum fluctuations and undergo rare switches. Using trajectories of quantum jumps across a tunable quantum-to-classical regime, the authors map the geometry of these switches directly from observed events. Escape from the small cycle occurs along one radial path with near-Arrhenius temperature scaling. Escape from the large cycle proceeds through several phase-specific corridors that carry different effective barriers, producing curvature in the overall rate. This phase dependence arises because the basin boundary between the cycles is itself periodic.

Core claim

In a driven optomechanical resonator, escape from the small-amplitude cycle proceeds through a single radial corridor and exhibits near-Arrhenius scaling, whereas escape from the large-amplitude cycle involves competing phase-localized corridors with distinct effective activation scales. The resulting curvature in the switching-rate scaling, together with event-conditioned phase distributions, identifies finite-fluctuation multichannel quantum escape between extended attractors.

What carries the argument

Reconstruction of escape geometry from quantum-jump trajectories across a controlled quantum-to-classical crossover, identifying phase-dependent corridors at the periodic basin boundary.

If this is right

  • Switching rates display curvature arising from the superposition of distinct activation scales.
  • Phase distributions of escape events are localized differently depending on which cycle is left.
  • Single-channel escape produces simple near-Arrhenius behavior while multichannel escape does not.
  • The reconstruction method applies to any driven-dissipative system whose semiclassical limit contains coexisting extended attractors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same trajectory-based mapping could be used to identify escape corridors in other open quantum systems that support multiple limit cycles.
  • Timing external fluctuations to specific phases of the cycle may allow selective suppression or enhancement of one escape channel.
  • Distinct activation scales for different phases imply that the effective barrier landscape can be shaped independently along the attractor.

Load-bearing premise

Quantum-jump trajectories across a controlled quantum-to-classical crossover can directly reconstruct the escape geometry from switching events without additional modeling assumptions about the basin boundary or fluctuation statistics.

What would settle it

Uniform phase distribution of switching events from the large-amplitude cycle or strictly linear Arrhenius scaling of the rate without curvature would falsify the claim of multichannel phase-resolved escape.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.24122 by Caroline Nowoczyn, Kilian Seibold, Ludwig Mathey.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a). B. Semiclassical dynamics At the semiclassical level, the coherent amplitudes α = ⟨aˆ⟩ and β = ⟨ ˆb⟩ satisfy i dα dt = (∆a − iκa/2)α + gα(β + β ∗ ) + F , i dβ dt = ωbβ − iκb(β − β ∗ )/2 + g|α| 2 , (3) which define a non-gradient nonlinear flow in a four-dimensional phase space spanned by Re(α),Im(α), Re(β),Im(β). We denote the corre￾sponding semiclassical mode populations as na ≡ |α| 2 and nb ≡ |β| 2 … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: shows the resulting phase diagram in the (∆a, F˜) plane. The yellow region labeled as “2 LC” corresponds to parameter sets for which two distinct limit cycles are found across the scanned initial conditions. The remain￾ing regions correspond to a single limit cycle (“1LC”), a single fixed point (“1FP”), two coexisting fixed points (“2FP”), coexistence of a fixed point with a limit cy￾cle (“1LC, 1FP”), or c… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: 3. Initialization The observation data ot are standardized using a global normalization fitted across the full ensemble of trajecto￾ries to ensure comparable scaling of the emission statis￾tics. The transition matrix is initialized with equal prob￾abilities for all transitions, aij = 1 2 , i, j ∈ {1, 2} , (E8) corresponding to a non-informative prior over state tran￾sitions. The initial state distribution … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Driven-dissipative quantum systems can recover stable dynamical attractors in the semiclassical limit, including coexisting limit cycles. At finite fluctuation strength, this classical coexistence becomes quantum metastability: the corresponding oscillatory states undergo rare fluctuation-induced transitions. We demonstrate phase-resolved quantum escape between two such states in a driven optomechanical resonator. Unlike escape from fixed points, switching between extended attractors occurs across a periodic basin boundary and depends on the phase at which fluctuations approach it. Using quantum-jump trajectories across a controlled quantum-to-classical crossover, we reconstruct the escape geometry directly from switching events. Escape from the small-amplitude cycle proceeds through a single radial corridor and exhibits near-Arrhenius scaling, whereas escape from the large-amplitude cycle involves competing phase-localized corridors with distinct effective activation scales. The resulting curvature in the switching-rate scaling, together with event-conditioned phase distributions, identifies finite-fluctuation multichannel quantum escape between extended attractors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates phase-resolved quantum escape between coexisting limit cycles in a driven optomechanical resonator. Using quantum-jump trajectories across a controlled quantum-to-classical crossover, the authors reconstruct escape geometry directly from switching events, reporting a single radial corridor with near-Arrhenius scaling for the small-amplitude cycle and competing phase-localized corridors with distinct effective activation scales for the large-amplitude cycle, leading to curvature in switching-rate scaling and event-conditioned phase distributions.

Significance. If the reconstruction holds, the result provides a concrete demonstration of multichannel quantum escape between extended attractors, extending metastability concepts beyond fixed points and offering falsifiable predictions for phase-dependent switching rates in driven-dissipative systems.

major comments (1)
  1. [Methods (trajectory analysis and corridor identification)] The central reconstruction of escape geometry from quantum-jump trajectories (as described in the abstract and methods) assumes a direct one-to-one mapping from observed switches to phase-localized corridors. This mapping requires explicit justification that no auxiliary modeling of the periodic basin boundary location or fluctuation statistics (e.g., smoothing, thresholding, or rate models) is implicitly used; otherwise the reported near-Arrhenius vs. multichannel scaling becomes dependent on those choices rather than raw data. A concrete test, such as sensitivity analysis to analysis parameters or comparison against independent semiclassical escape-rate calculations, is needed to confirm the claim is load-bearing.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Results] Notation for the effective activation scales and corridors should be defined consistently with any equations for the switching rates.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for event-conditioned phase distributions should specify the binning and conditioning criteria used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and the constructive comment on the trajectory analysis. We address the point below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Methods (trajectory analysis and corridor identification)] The central reconstruction of escape geometry from quantum-jump trajectories (as described in the abstract and methods) assumes a direct one-to-one mapping from observed switches to phase-localized corridors. This mapping requires explicit justification that no auxiliary modeling of the periodic basin boundary location or fluctuation statistics (e.g., smoothing, thresholding, or rate models) is implicitly used; otherwise the reported near-Arrhenius vs. multichannel scaling becomes dependent on those choices rather than raw data. A concrete test, such as sensitivity analysis to analysis parameters or comparison against independent semiclassical escape-rate calculations, is needed to confirm the claim is load-bearing.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit statement of the detection procedure is needed to make the mapping unambiguous. The reconstruction uses only the times and phases of detected quantum jumps in the raw photon-counting records; no smoothing, auxiliary basin-boundary model, or rate-equation fitting is applied to locate corridors. Switching events are identified by the standard quantum-jump threshold on the instantaneous photon number. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in the Methods section that (i) reproduces the exact jump-detection criterion, (ii) reports a sensitivity analysis in which the detection threshold is varied over a factor of two and the resulting corridor locations and scaling exponents remain unchanged within statistical error, and (iii) compares the measured escape rates against independent semiclassical WKB calculations for the same parameters. These additions will confirm that the reported single-corridor versus multichannel behavior is carried by the raw trajectories. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: reconstruction presented as direct numerical demonstration from trajectories

full rationale

The provided abstract and description contain no derivations, equations, or parameters that reduce to self-defined quantities by construction. The central claim is a numerical reconstruction of escape geometry from observed switching events in quantum-jump trajectories across a quantum-to-classical crossover, presented without fitted inputs renamed as predictions or load-bearing self-citations. No self-definitional steps, ansatzes smuggled via citation, or uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work appear in the text. The result is self-contained as a demonstration of phase-resolved multichannel escape, with independent content from the trajectory data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all such elements are unknown.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5685 in / 942 out tokens · 36533 ms · 2026-06-30T15:26:55.975258+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Moreover, such a reconstruction relies on detailed knowledge of the dynamical model and therefore does not directly trans- late to experimentally recorded trajectories

    Motivation Trajectory segmentation based on a direct reconstruc- tion of the basins of attraction and the separatrix from the underlying quantum master equation would require resolving the full four-dimensional phase-space structure of the stochastic dynamics, which is computationally pro- hibitive for long quantum-jump trajectories. Moreover, such a reco...

  2. [2]

    output indepen- dence

    Model definition The input for training the HMM is a sequence of ob- servations ot, where t = 0 , . . . , T denotes the observa- tion time. The model assumes that these observations are generated by an underlying sequence of latent states {st} that evolve according to a Markov process. Second, it assumes that the probability of an observation depends only...

  3. [3]

    Initialization The observation dataot are standardized using a global normalization fitted across the full ensemble of trajecto- ries to ensure comparable scaling of the emission statis- tics. The transition matrix is initialized with equal prob- abilities for all transitions, aij = 1 2 , i, j ∈ {1, 2} , (E8) corresponding to a non-informative prior over ...

  4. [4]

    The training is performed jointly across all trajectories by maximizing the summed log-likelihood of all sequences

    Training and State Decoding The HMM parameters, including transition probabil- ities and emission statistics, are learned from the tra- jectory data using maximum-likelihood estimation via the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm for Hid- den Markov models, also known as Baum-Welch algo- rithm [78, 79]. The training is performed jointly across all traj...

  5. [5]

    flickering

    Scope and limitations The Hidden Markov model employed here provides an effective coarse-grained description of the metastable switching dynamics between the two limit-cycle attrac- tors. Its validity relies on several assumptions that de- fine the scope of applicability and impose limitations on the interpretation of the results. First, the HMM as- sumes...

  6. [6]

    Macieszczak, M

    K. Macieszczak, M. Gut ¸˘ a, I. Lesanovsky and J. P. Gar- rahan, Towards a Theory of Metastability in Open Quan- tum Dynamics , Physical Review Letters 116, 240404 (2016)

  7. [7]

    Macieszczak, D

    K. Macieszczak, D. C. Rose, I. Lesanovsky and J. P. Gar- rahan, Theory of classical metastability in open quantum systems, Physical Review Research 3, 033047 (2021)

  8. [8]

    C. K. Andersen, A. Kamal, N. A. Masluk, I. M. Pop, A. Blais and M. H. Devoret, Quantum Versus Classi- cal Switching Dynamics of Driven Dissipative Kerr Res- onators, Physical Review Applied 13, 044017 (2020)

  9. [9]

    Marthaler and M

    M. Marthaler and M. I. Dykman, Switching via quantum activation: A parametrically modulated oscillator , Phys- ical Review A 73, 042108 (2006). 20

  10. [10]

    Carde, R

    L. Carde, R. Gautier, N. Didier, A. Petrescu, J. Cohen and A. McDonald, Nonperturbative Switching Rates in Bistable Open Quantum Systems: From Driven Kerr Os- cillators to Dissipative Cat Qubits , Physical Review Let- ters 136, 100402 (2026)

  11. [11]

    L¨ orch, J

    N. L¨ orch, J. Qian, A. Clerk, F. Marquardt and K. Ham- merer, Laser Theory for Optomechanics: Limit Cycles in the Quantum Regime , Physical Review X 4, 011015 (2014)

  12. [12]

    Gao, F.-C

    M. Gao, F.-C. Lei, C.-G. Du and G.-L. Long, Self- sustained oscillation and dynamical multistability of op- tomechanical systems in the extremely-large-amplitude regime, Physical Review A 91, 013833 (2015)

  13. [13]

    Ben Arosh, M

    L. Ben Arosh, M. C. Cross and R. Lifshitz, Quantum limit cycles and the Rayleigh and van der Pol oscillators , Physical Review Research 3, 013130 (2021)

  14. [14]

    Marquardt, J

    F. Marquardt, J. G. E. Harris and S. M. Girvin, Dy- namical Multistability Induced by Radiation Pressure in High-Finesse Micromechanical Optical Cavities, Physical Review Letters 96, 103901 (2006)

  15. [15]

    Elste, S

    F. Elste, S. M. Girvin and A. A. Clerk, Quantum Noise Interference and Backaction Cooling in Cavity Nanome- chanics, Physical Review Letters 102, 207209 (2009)

  16. [16]

    Krantz, A

    P. Krantz, A. Bengtsson, M. Simoen, S. Gustavsson, V. Shumeiko, W. D. Oliver, C. M. Wilson, P. Delsing and J. Bylander, Single-shot read-out of a superconduct- ing qubit using a Josephson parametric oscillator , Nature Communications 7, 11417 (2016)

  17. [17]

    Metelmann and A

    A. Metelmann and A. Clerk, Quantum-Limited Amplifi- cation via Reservoir Engineering , Physical Review Let- ters 112, 133904 (2014)

  18. [18]

    T. E. Lee, C.-K. Chan and S. Wang,Entanglement tongue and quantum synchronization of disordered oscillators , Physical Review E 89, 022913 (2014)

  19. [19]

    H. A. Kramers, Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions , Physica 7, 284 (1940)

  20. [20]

    Langer, Statistical theory of the decay of metastable states, Annals of Physics 54, 258 (1969)

    J. Langer, Statistical theory of the decay of metastable states, Annals of Physics 54, 258 (1969)

  21. [21]

    H¨ anggi, P

    P. H¨ anggi, P. Talkner and M. Borkovec, Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers , Reviews of Modern Physics 62, 251 (1990)

  22. [22]

    M. H. Devoret, J. M. Martinis and J. Clarke, Measure- ments of Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling out of the Zero-Voltage State of a Current-Biased Josephson Junc- tion, Physical Review Letters 55, 1908 (1985)

  23. [23]

    Grabert, P

    H. Grabert, P. Olschowski and U. Weiss, Quantum de- cay rates for dissipative systems at finite temperatures , Physical Review B 36, 1931 (1987)

  24. [24]

    Horsthemke, Noise-Induced Transitions, edited by R

    W. Horsthemke, Noise-Induced Transitions, edited by R. Lefever, Springer Series in Synergetics Ser. No. v.15 (Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006) description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources

  25. [25]

    Eyring, The Activated Complex in Chemical Reac- tions, The Journal of Chemical Physics 3, 107 (1935)

    H. Eyring, The Activated Complex in Chemical Reac- tions, The Journal of Chemical Physics 3, 107 (1935)

  26. [26]

    R. F. Grote and J. T. Hynes, The stable states picture of chemical reactions. II. Rate constants for condensed and gas phase reaction models , The Journal of Chemical Physics 73, 2715 (1980)

  27. [27]

    Pollak and P

    E. Pollak and P. Talkner, Reaction rate theory: What it was, where is it today, and where is it going? , Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science15, 026116 (2005)

  28. [28]

    Hasty, J

    J. Hasty, J. Pradines, M. Dolnik and J. J. Collins, Noise- based switches and amplifiers for gene expression , Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97, 2075 (2000)

  29. [29]

    Assaf and B

    M. Assaf and B. Meerson, WKB theory of large devi- ations in stochastic populations , Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 50, 263001 (2017)

  30. [30]

    Graham and T

    R. Graham and T. T´ el,Existence of a Potential for Dis- sipative Dynamical Systems, Physical Review Letters 52, 9 (1984)

  31. [31]

    Freidlin and M

    M. Freidlin and M. Weber, Random perturbations of dy- namical systems and diffusion processes with conserva- tion laws , Probability Theory and Related Fields 128, 441 (2004)

  32. [32]

    M. I. Dykman, B. Golding, L. I. McCann, V. N. Smelyan- skiy, D. G. Luchinsky, R. Mannella and P. V. E. Mc- Clintock, Activated escape of periodically driven systems, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 11, 587 (2001)

  33. [33]

    D. G. Luchinsky, R. Mannella, P. V. E. McClintock, M. I. Dykman and V. N. Smelyanskiy, Thermally activated es- cape of driven systems: the activation energy , Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 32, L321 (1999)

  34. [34]

    Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    A. Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

  35. [35]

    W. E, W. Ren and E. Vanden-Eijnden, String method for the study of rare events , Physical Review B 66, 052301 (2002)

  36. [36]

    W. E, W. Ren and E. Vanden-Eijnden, Minimum action method for the study of rare events , Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 57, 637 (2004)

  37. [37]

    Heymann and E

    M. Heymann and E. Vanden-Eijnden, The geometric minimum action method: A least action principle on the space of curves , Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 61, 1052 (2008)

  38. [38]

    W. E and E. Vanden-Eijnden, Transition-Path The- ory and Path-Finding Algorithms for the Study of Rare Events, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 61, 391 (2010)

  39. [39]

    R. S. Maier and D. L. Stein, Effect of focusing and caus- tics on exit phenomena in systems lacking detailed bal- ance, Physical Review Letters 71, 1783 (1993)

  40. [40]

    R. S. Maier and D. L. Stein, Oscillatory Behavior of the Rate of Escape through an Unstable Limit Cycle, Physical Review Letters 77, 4860 (1996)

  41. [41]

    M. I. Dykman and V. N. Smelyanski, Fluctuational tran- sitions between stable states of a nonlinear oscillator driven by random resonant force , Physical Review A 41, 3090 (1990)

  42. [42]

    M. I. Dykman, E. Mori, J. Ross and P. M. Hunt, Large fluctuations and optimal paths in chemical kinetics , The Journal of Chemical Physics 100, 5735 (1994)

  43. [43]

    A. N. Silchenko, S. Beri, D. G. Luchinsky and P. V. E. McClintock, Fluctuational Transitions through a Frac- tal Basin Boundary , Physical Review Letters 91, 174104 (2003)

  44. [44]

    T. K. Mavrogordatos, Quantum Jumps in Ampli- tude Bistability: Tracking a Coherent and Invertible State Localization , Annalen der Physik 538 (2025), 10.1002/andp.202500388

  45. [45]

    V. Y. Mylnikov, S. O. Potashin, M. S. Ukhtary and G. S. Sokolovskii, Switching rates in Kerr resonator with two- photon dissipation and driving (2025). 21

  46. [46]

    C.-W. Lee, P. Brookes, K.-S. Park, M. H. Szyma´ nska and E. Ginossar, Real-time instanton approach to quantum activation, Physical Review A 112 (2025), 10.1103/5jtm- ht4n

  47. [47]

    Kamal, A

    A. Kamal, A. Marblestone and M. Devoret, Signal-to- pump back action and self-oscillation in double-pump Josephson parametric amplifier , Physical Review B 79, 184301 (2009)

  48. [48]

    Z. R. Lin, Y. Nakamura and M. I. Dykman, Critical fluc- tuations and the rates of interstate switching near the excitation threshold of a quantum parametric oscillator , Physical Review E 92, 022105 (2015)

  49. [49]

    Peano and M

    V. Peano and M. Thorwart, Quasienergy description of the driven Jaynes-Cummings model , Physical Review B 82, 155129 (2010)

  50. [50]

    D. K. J. Boneß, W. Belzig and M. I. Dykman, Zero- temperature phase-flip rate in a biased parametric oscil- lator, Physical Review Research 7, 023188 (2025)

  51. [51]

    Thompson and A

    F. Thompson and A. Kamenev, Qubit decoherence and symmetry restoration through real-time instantons, Phys- ical Review Research 4, 023020 (2022)

  52. [52]

    Thompson and A

    F. Thompson and A. Kamenev, Population dynamics of Schr¨ odinger cats, SciPost Physics 18, 046 (2025)

  53. [53]

    T. F. Roque, F. Marquardt and O. M. Yevtushenko,Non- linear dynamics of weakly dissipative optomechanical sys- tems, New Journal of Physics 22, 013049 (2020)

  54. [54]

    Christou, V

    S. Christou, V. Kovanis, A. E. Giannakopoulos and Y. Kominis, Parametric control of self-sustained and self- modulated optomechanical oscillations , Physical Review A 103, 053513 (2021)

  55. [55]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics , Reviews of Modern Physics 86, 1391 (2014)

  56. [56]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University PressOxford, 2007)

  57. [57]

    Dekker, Quantization of the linearly damped harmonic oscillator, Physical Review A 16, 2126 (1977)

    H. Dekker, Quantization of the linearly damped harmonic oscillator, Physical Review A 16, 2126 (1977)

  58. [58]

    S. N. A. Duffus, V. M. Dwyer and M. J. Everitt, Open quantum systems, effective Hamiltonians, and device characterization, Physical Review B 96, 134520 (2017)

  59. [59]

    Generalized master equation for driven quantum oscillators: microscopic origin of nonlinear dissipation and asymmetric resonances

    J. Wagner, J. Maki, O. Zilberberg and K. Seibold, Generalized master equation for driven quantum os- cillators: microscopic origin of nonlinear dissipation and asymmetric resonances , arXiv e-prints (2026), 10.48550/arXiv.2605.08021, arXiv:2605.08021 [quant- ph]

  60. [60]

    Thus, ℵ−1 plays the role of an effective Planck constant

    Equivalently, for the rescaled operators ˜ˆa = ˆa/ √ ℵ and ˜ˆb = ˆb/ √ ℵ, one has [ ˜ˆa, ˜ˆa†] = [ ˜ˆb,˜ˆb†] = 1 /ℵ. Thus, ℵ−1 plays the role of an effective Planck constant

  61. [61]

    Seibold, R

    K. Seibold, R. Rota and V. Savona, Dissipative time crys- tal in an asymmetric nonlinear photonic dimer , Physical Review A 101, 033839 (2020)

  62. [62]

    Seibold, R

    K. Seibold, R. Rota, F. Minganti and V. Savona, Quan- tum dynamics of dissipative Kerr solitons , Physical Re- view A 105, 053530 (2022)

  63. [63]

    Nowoczyn, L

    C. Nowoczyn, L. Mathey and K. Seibold, Universal quantum melting of quasiperiodic attractors in driven- dissipative cavities, Phys. Rev. A , (2026)

  64. [64]

    R. Dum, A. S. Parkins, P. Zoller and C. W. Gardiner, Monte Carlo simulation of master equations in quan- tum optics for vacuum, thermal, and squeezed reservoirs , Physical Review A 46, 4382 (1992)

  65. [65]

    Dalibard, Y

    J. Dalibard, Y. Castin and K. Mølmer, Wave-function approach to dissipative processes in quantum optics , Physical Review Letters 68, 580 (1992)

  66. [66]

    Mølmer, Y

    K. Mølmer, Y. Castin and J. Dalibard, Monte Carlo wave-function method in quantum optics , Journal of the Optical Society of America B 10, 524 (1993)

  67. [67]

    H. Carmichael, An Open Systems Approach to Quan- tum Optics: Lectures Presented at the Universit´ e Libre de Bruxelles October 28 to November 4, 1991 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1993)

  68. [68]

    Sarkar and D

    P. Sarkar and D. S. Ray,Tuning limit cycles with a noise: Survival and collapse , Physical Review E 109, 034209 (2024)

  69. [69]

    This usage is related to, but distinct from, Refs

    Here, quantum melting denotes the fluctuation-induced loss of a well-separated metastable attractor structure. This usage is related to, but distinct from, Refs. [56, 58], where the term refers to the degradation of long-lived periodic or quasiperiodic modes associated with a single attractor

  70. [70]

    Rabiner and B

    L. Rabiner and B. Juang, An introduction to hidden Markov models, IEEE ASSP Magazine 3, 4 (1986)

  71. [71]

    Rabiner, A tutorial on hidden Markov models and se- lected applications in speech recognition , Proceedings of the IEEE 77, 257 (1989)

    L. Rabiner, A tutorial on hidden Markov models and se- lected applications in speech recognition , Proceedings of the IEEE 77, 257 (1989)

  72. [72]

    E. L. Kaplan and P. Meier, Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , Journal of the American Statistical Association 53, 457 (1958)

  73. [73]

    R. S. Maier and D. L. Stein, Limiting Exit Location Dis- tributions in the Stochastic Exit Problem , SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 57, 752 (1997)

  74. [74]

    Berglund and B

    N. Berglund and B. Gentz, On the Noise-Induced Passage through an Unstable Periodic Orbit II: General Case , SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 46, 310 (2014)

  75. [75]

    de la Cruz, R

    R. de la Cruz, R. Perez-Carrasco, P. Guerrero, T. Alarcon and K. M. Page, Minimum Action Path Theory Reveals the Details of Stochastic Transitions Out of Oscillatory States, Physical Review Letters 120, 128102 (2018)

  76. [76]

    D. G. Luchinsky, R. S. Maier, R. Mannella, P. V. E. Mc- Clintock and D. L. Stein, Experiments on Critical Phe- nomena in a Noisy Exit Problem , Physical Review Let- ters 79, 3109 (1997)

  77. [77]

    Khasin and M

    M. Khasin and M. I. Dykman, Extinction Rate Fragility in Population Dynamics , Physical Review Letters 103, 068101 (2009)

  78. [78]

    H. B. Chan and C. Stambaugh, Activation Barrier Scal- ing and Crossover for Noise-Induced Switching in Mi- cromechanical Parametric Oscillators , Physical Review Letters 99, 060601 (2007)

  79. [79]

    [84, 85]

    For a general overview of optimal-path and large- deviation approaches to noise-induced transitions in nonequilibrium dynamical systems, see Ref. [84, 85]

  80. [80]

    Comment on "Minimum Action Path Theory Reveals the Details of Stochastic Transitions Out of Oscillatory States"

    B. Meerson and N. R. Smith, Comment on ”Minimum Action Path Theory Reveals the Details of Stochastic Transitions Out of Oscillatory States” , Physical Review Letters 122, 059801 (2019), arXiv:1804.01173 [physics]

Showing first 80 references.