pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.24424 · v1 · pith:6P5VMMXOnew · submitted 2026-05-23 · 🌀 gr-qc · quant-ph

Non-monotonic evolution of multipartite entanglement under the Unruh effect

Shu-Min Wu , Si-Han Shang , Si-Yu Liu , Rui-Yang Xu , Qianqian Liu , Xiao-Li Huang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 13:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc quant-ph
keywords Unruh effectmultipartite entanglementDicke stateUnruh-DeWitt detectorrelativistic quantum informationtetrapartite entanglementnon-monotonic evolutionacceleration
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Unruh effect causes tetrapartite entanglement in a four-qubit Dicke state to decrease then increase with rising acceleration.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how entanglement among four qubits in a Dicke state changes when one qubit undergoes uniform acceleration, modeled by Unruh-DeWitt detectors. It finds that the entanglement measure drops initially but then rises again toward a nonzero value as acceleration increases, rather than steadily falling. This non-monotonic pattern indicates the Unruh effect can strengthen multipartite correlations in a limited acceleration range. The result suggests Dicke states retain usable entanglement under relativistic motion where other states might lose it entirely. Such behavior points to possible advantages for quantum information tasks involving accelerated observers.

Core claim

In the four-qubit Dicke state with one detector in uniform acceleration, the tetrapartite entanglement first decreases and then increases to a finite nonzero value as the acceleration parameter grows, revealing that the Unruh effect can enhance rather than solely degrade multipartite entanglement within a finite regime.

What carries the argument

Unruh-DeWitt detector model applied to one accelerated qubit in a four-qubit Dicke state, tracking the evolution of a tetrapartite entanglement measure with acceleration.

If this is right

  • Multipartite entanglement in Dicke states does not follow the conventional monotonic degradation under the Unruh effect.
  • There exists a finite range of accelerations where increasing acceleration improves entanglement.
  • Dicke states provide more robust resources for relativistic quantum information tasks than states subject only to degradation.
  • The Unruh effect plays a dual role, both degrading and enhancing correlations depending on the acceleration regime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar non-monotonic patterns may appear in other symmetric multipartite states when only one party accelerates.
  • Relativistic quantum protocols could exploit the high-acceleration regime for entanglement generation rather than treating acceleration as pure noise.
  • Extensions to curved spacetime or non-uniform acceleration might preserve or amplify this enhancement effect.

Load-bearing premise

The interaction between the accelerated detector and the field is fully captured by the Unruh-DeWitt model without extra decoherence or higher-order corrections.

What would settle it

Numerical computation or experiment showing the entanglement measure continues to decrease monotonically for all acceleration values instead of rising after an initial drop.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.24424 by Qianqian Liu, Rui-Yang Xu, Shu-Min Wu, Si-Han Shang, Si-Yu Liu, Xiao-Li Huang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Schematic setup of the tetrapartite Unruh–DeWitt de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the behavior of tetrapartite entanglement in a four-qubit Dicke state under relativistic motion by employing the Unruh-DeWitt detector model, where one detector undergoes uniform acceleration. We show that the entanglement exhibits a non-monotonic evolution: it first decreases and subsequently increases toward a finite value as the acceleration grows. In contrast to the conventional view that the Unruh effect leads to a monotonic degradation of multipartite entanglement, our results demonstrate that it can instead enhance multipartite entanglement within a finite parameter regime. This behavior reveals a dual role of the Unruh effect in multipartite systems. Our findings therefore provide a refined understanding of relativistic multipartite quantum correlations, indicating that Dicke states constitute more robust multipartite quantum resources against Unruh-induced decoherence and may offer advantages for relativistic quantum information processing tasks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies tetrapartite entanglement for a four-qubit Dicke state in which one detector undergoes uniform acceleration, modeled via the Unruh-DeWitt interaction with the Minkowski vacuum. It reports that a standard entanglement monotone first decreases and then increases toward a nonzero value with rising proper acceleration, indicating that the Unruh effect can enhance rather than only degrade multipartite correlations within a finite parameter window.

Significance. If the central numerical or analytic result survives scrutiny, the work supplies a concrete counter-example to the prevailing expectation of monotonic Unruh-induced degradation of multipartite entanglement. The finding that Dicke states can exhibit an upturn supplies a potentially useful distinction between bipartite and multipartite relativistic resources and may inform proposals for relativistic quantum communication.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results / entanglement calculation] The non-monotonic upturn is obtained from the reduced four-qubit density matrix computed to leading (first) order in the detector-field coupling λ. Because the Unruh temperature scales linearly with acceleration, the size of the neglected O(λ²) corrections to the transition amplitudes and induced field correlations also grows with a; it is therefore necessary to verify that the reported increase remains inside the perturbative window (see the parameter values used for the entanglement plots).
  2. [Introduction and Discussion] The claim that the behavior is 'in contrast to the conventional view' requires an explicit comparison, within the same model and state, to the monotonic degradation obtained for the corresponding two-qubit or three-qubit cases; without that benchmark the dual-role interpretation rests on an incomplete contrast.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the four-qubit Dicke state and the precise definition of the entanglement monotone (e.g., which multipartite generalization of concurrence or negativity is employed) should be stated once in the main text rather than only in the abstract.
  2. The range of accelerations (or dimensionless parameter aσ) over which the non-monotonic regime occurs should be stated numerically in the text or caption, not only qualitatively as 'finite parameter regime'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major point below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results / entanglement calculation] The non-monotonic upturn is obtained from the reduced four-qubit density matrix computed to leading (first) order in the detector-field coupling λ. Because the Unruh temperature scales linearly with acceleration, the size of the neglected O(λ²) corrections to the transition amplitudes and induced field correlations also grows with a; it is therefore necessary to verify that the reported increase remains inside the perturbative window (see the parameter values used for the entanglement plots).

    Authors: We agree that the perturbative regime must be explicitly verified. Our calculations employ a small fixed coupling λ (with values chosen such that λ remains well below unity across the plotted acceleration range), consistent with the standard first-order Unruh-DeWitt treatment. We will revise the manuscript to include a dedicated paragraph or appendix that bounds the O(λ²) error for the specific parameter values used in the entanglement plots, thereby confirming that the reported non-monotonic upturn lies inside the perturbative window. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Introduction and Discussion] The claim that the behavior is 'in contrast to the conventional view' requires an explicit comparison, within the same model and state, to the monotonic degradation obtained for the corresponding two-qubit or three-qubit cases; without that benchmark the dual-role interpretation rests on an incomplete contrast.

    Authors: We accept that an explicit side-by-side comparison within the identical Unruh-DeWitt model would make the contrast more rigorous. While the conventional monotonic degradation is well-documented for bipartite cases, we will add a concise comparison (either in the main text or as a supplementary figure) showing the monotonic behavior for the corresponding two-qubit and three-qubit reductions or analogous states under the same accelerated-detector setup. This will directly support the dual-role claim for the tetrapartite Dicke state. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; standard perturbative calculation of reduced density matrix yields the reported non-monotonicity

full rationale

The derivation applies the Unruh-DeWitt detector model to a four-qubit Dicke state, computes the joint detector-field evolution to leading order in the coupling, traces out the field, and evaluates an entanglement monotone on the resulting reduced state. No equation is defined in terms of its own output, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing step rests on a self-citation chain. The non-monotonic feature is an explicit consequence of the first-order transition amplitudes and the acceleration-dependent Unruh temperature within the model's stated regime; the calculation is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. Standard quantum field theory in accelerated frames and the Unruh-DeWitt detector formalism are presupposed but not detailed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5680 in / 1069 out tokens · 28351 ms · 2026-06-30T13:39:30.442734+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C. H. Bennett, Quantum information, Phys. Scr. 1998, 210 (1998)

    1998

  2. [2]

    S. Zhou, P . Zhang, and Z. Y u, Environment-induced transitions in many-body quantum teleportation, Phys. Rev. Research 8, L012007 (2026). 13

    2026

  3. [3]

    Y . Guo, X. Chen, H. Peng, and Q. Tian, Average correlation as a resource of quantum teleportation, Phys. Rev. A 112, 052403 (2025)

    2025

  4. [4]

    Anil and R

    A. Anil and R. Arun, Protecting fidelity of quantum telepo rtation by quantum interferences, Phys. Rev. A 113, 022408 (2026)

    2026

  5. [5]

    K. Lee, F. Turro, and X. Y ao, Quantum computing for energy correlators, Phys. Rev. D 111, 054514 (2025)

    2025

  6. [6]

    I. D. Smith, B. Klaver, H. P . Nautrup, W. Lechner, and H. J. Briegel, Minimally universal parity quantum computing, Phys. Rev. A 112, 032606 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Bozzio, C

    M. Bozzio, C. Cr´ epeau, P . Wallden, and P . Walther, Quantum cryptography beyond key distribution: Theory and experiment, Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 045006 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    H. Y u, B. Crockett, N. Montaut, S. Sciara, M. Chemnitz, S. T. Chu, B. E. Little, D. J. Moss, Z. Wang et al, Exploiting Nonlocal Correlations for Dispersion-Re silient Quantum Communications, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 220801 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    Wang and L

    Z. Wang and L. Jiang, Passive Environment-Assisted Quan tum Communication with GKP States, Phys. Rev. X 15, 021003 (2025)

    2025

  10. [10]

    Gandotra, Z

    A. Gandotra, Z. Wang, A. A. Clerk, and L. Jiang, Quantum c ommunication over bandwidth-and- time-limited channels, Phys. Rev. A 113, 032616 (2026)

    2026

  11. [11]

    R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation proces ses, Phys. Rev. 93, 99 (1954)

    1954

  12. [12]

    G¨ uhne, F

    O. G¨ uhne, F. Bodoky, and M. Blaauboer, Multiparticle entanglement under the influence of decoher- ence, Phys. Rev. A 78, 060301(R) (2008)

    2008

  13. [13]

    T´ oth, W

    G. T´ oth, W. Wieczorek, D. Gross, R. Krischek, C. Schwem mer, and H. Weinfurter, Permutationally Invariant Quantum Tomography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 250403 (2010)

    2010

  14. [14]

    Moroder, P

    T. Moroder, P . Hyllus, G. T´ oth, C. Schwemmer, A. Niggeb aum, S. Gaile, O. G¨ uhne and H. Wein- furter, Permutationally invariant state reconstruction, New J. Phys. 14, 105001 (2012)

    2012

  15. [15]

    T´ oth, Detection of multipartite entanglement in th e vicinity of symmetric Dicke states, J

    G. T´ oth, Detection of multipartite entanglement in th e vicinity of symmetric Dicke states, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24, 275 (2007)

    2007

  16. [16]

    T´ oth, W

    G. T´ oth, W. Wieczorek, R. Krischek, N. Kiesel, P . Michelberger and H. Weinfurter, Practical methods for witnessing genuine multi-qubit entanglement in the vicinity of symmetric states, New J. Phys. 11, 083002 (2009)

    2009

  17. [17]

    Huber, P

    M. Huber, P . Erker, H. Schimpf, A. Gabriel, and B. Hiesma yr, Experimentally feasible set of cri- teria detecting genuine multipartite entanglement in n-qubit Dicke states and in higher-dimensional 14 systems, Phys. Rev. A 83, 040301(R) (2011)

    2011

  18. [18]

    L. Novo, T. Moroder, and O. G¨ uhne, Genuine multiparticle entanglement of permutationally invariant states, Phys. Rev. A 88, 012305 (2013)

    2013

  19. [19]

    Kiesel, C

    N. Kiesel, C. Schmid, G. T´ oth, E. Solano, and H. Weinfur ter, Experimental Observation of Four- Photon Entangled Dicke State with High Fidelity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 063604 (2007)

    2007

  20. [20]

    Wieczorek, R

    W. Wieczorek, R. Krischek, N. Kiesel, P . Michelberger, G. T´ oth, and H. Weinfurter, Experimental Entanglement of a Six-Photon Symmetric Dicke State, Phys. R ev. Lett. 103, 020504 (2009)

    2009

  21. [21]

    Prevedel, G

    R. Prevedel, G. Cronenberg, M. S. Tame, M. Paternostro, P . Walther, M. S. Kim, and A. Zeilinger, Experimental Realization of Dicke States of up to Six Qubits for Multiparty Quantum Networking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 020503 (2009)

    2009

  22. [22]

    H. Du, R. B. Mann, Fisher information as a probe of spacet ime structure: relativistic quantum metrol- ogy in (A)dS, J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 112 (2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    J. P . Covey, I. Pikovski, J. Borregaard, Probing curved spacetime with a distributed atomic processor clock, PRX Quantum 6, 030310 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    Barman, I

    S. Barman, I. Chakraborty, S. Mukherjee, Signatures of gravitational wave memory in the radiative process of entangled quantum probes, Phys. Rev. D 111, 025021 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    Z. Liu, R. Q. Y ang, H. Fan, J. Wang, Simulation of the mass less Dirac field in 1+1D curved space- time, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68, 290411 (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    Agullo, A

    I. Agullo, A. Delhom, ´A. Parra-L´ opez, Toward the observation of entangled pairs in BEC analog expanding universes, Phys. Rev. D 110, 125023 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    J. Hu, L. Feng, Z. Zhang, C. Chin, Quantum simulation of U nruh radiation, Nat. Phys. 15, 785 (2019)

    2019

  28. [28]

    T. Li, L. H. Liu, Cosmological complexity of the modified dispersion relation, Phys. Lett. B 854, 138728 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    H. T. Zheng, X. F. Zhou, G. C. Guo, Z. W. Zhou, Enhancing an alog Unruh effect via superradiance in a cylindrical cavity, Phys. Rev. Research 7, 013027 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    K. B. Tallent, D. E. Sheehy, Analog Unruh effect of inhom ogeneous one-dimensional Dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. B 112, 104306 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    T. Li, L. H. Liu, Inflationary Krylov complexity, J. High Energ. Phys. 2024, 123 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    Belgiorno, S

    F. Belgiorno, S. L. Cacciatori, A. Farahat, and A. Vigan ` o, Analog Hawking effect: BEC and surface waves, Phys. Rev. D 102, 105004 (2020). 15

    2020

  33. [33]

    J. Foo, C. S. Arabaci, M. Zych, R. B. Mann, Quantum Signat ures of Black Hole Mass Superpositions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 181301 (2022)

    2022

  34. [34]

    J. Foo, C. S. Arabaci, M. Zych, R. B. Mann, Quantum superp ositions of Minkowski spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 107, 045014 (2023)

    2023

  35. [35]

    Y . Tang, W. Liu, J. Wang, Observational signature of Lorentz violation in acceleration radiation, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1108 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    W. Liu, C. Wen, J. Wang, Lorentz violation alleviates gr avitationally induced entanglement degrada- tion, J. High Energ. Phys. 2025, 184 (2025)

    2025

  37. [37]

    S. Sen, A. Mukherjee and S. Gangopadhyay, Entanglement degradation as a tool to detect signatures of modified gravity, Phys. Rev. D 109, 046012 (2024)

    2024

  38. [38]

    Fuentes-Schuller and R

    I. Fuentes-Schuller and R. B. Mann, Alice falls into a bl ack hole: Entanglement in non-inertial frames, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 120404 (2005)

    2005

  39. [39]

    Pan and J

    Q. Pan and J. Jing, Hawking radiation, entanglement, an d teleportation in the background of an asymptotically flat static black hole, Phys. Rev. D 78, 065015 (2008)

    2008

  40. [40]

    Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, L

    E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, L. J. Garay and J. Le´ on, Unveiling quantum entanglement degradation near a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D 82, 064006 (2010)

    2010

  41. [41]

    Wu and L

    H. Wu and L. Chen, Orbital angular momentum entanglemen t in noninertial reference frame, Phys. Rev. D 107, 065006 (2023)

    2023

  42. [42]

    P . M. Alsing, I. Fuentes-Schuller, R. B. Mann and T. E. Te ssier, Entanglement of Dirac fields in non-inertial frames, Phys. Rev. A 74, 032326 (2006)

    2006

  43. [43]

    Elghaayda, A

    S. Elghaayda, A. Ali, S. Al-Kuwari and M. Mansour, Physi cally accessible and inaccessible quantum correlations of Dirac fields in Schwarzschild spacetime, Ph ys. Lett. A 525, 129915 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    J. K. Basak, D. Giataganas, S. Mondal and W. Y . Wen, Reflec ted entropy and Markov gap in nonin- ertial frames, Phys. Rev. D 108, 125009 (2023)

    2023

  45. [45]

    A. Ali, S. Al-Kuwari, M. Ghominejad, M. T. Rahim, D. Wang and S. Haddadi, Quantum character- istics near event horizons, Phys. Rev. D 110, 064001 (2024)

    2024

  46. [46]

    Adesso, I

    G. Adesso, I. Fuentes-Schuller and M. Ericsson, Contin uous-variable entanglement sharing in non- inertial frames, Phys. Rev. A 76, 062112 (2007)

    2007

  47. [47]

    H. E. Camblong, A. Chakraborty, P . Lopez-Duque, C. R. Or d´ o˜ nez, Entanglement degradation in causal diamonds, Phys. Rev. D 109, 105003 (2024)

    2024

  48. [48]

    Belfiglio, O

    A. Belfiglio, O. Luongo, S. Mancini, Quantum entangleme nt in cosmology, Phys. Rep. 1146, 1 16 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    X. Liu, W. Liu, Z. Liu, J. Wang, Harvesting correlations from BTZ black hole coupled to a Lorentz- violating vector field, J. High Energ. Phys. 2025, 94 (2025)

    2025

  50. [50]

    Izquierdo, J

    W. Izquierdo, J. Beltran, E. Arias, Enhancement of harv esting vacuum entanglement in Cosmic String Spacetime, J. High Energ. Phys. 2025, 49 (2025)

    2025

  51. [51]

    Z. Liu, W. Liu, X. Liu, J. Wang, Wormhole-Induced correl ation: A Link Between Two Universes, arXiv:2510.04005

    work page arXiv

  52. [52]

    Chakraborty, L

    A. Chakraborty, L. Hackl, M. Zych, Entanglement harves ting in quantum superposed spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 111, 104052 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    X. Liu, Z. Tian, J. Jing, Entanglement dynamics in κ-deformed spacetime, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 67, 100411 (2024)

    2024

  54. [54]

    J. Foo, R. B. Mann, M. Zych, Entanglement amplification b etween superposed detectors in flat and curved spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 103, 065013 (2021)

    2021

  55. [55]

    Y . Ji, J. Zhang and H. Y u, Entanglement harvesting in cos mic string spacetime, J. High Energ. Phys. 2024, 161 (2024)

    2024

  56. [56]

    Z. Liu, J. Zhang and H. Y u, Harvesting correlations from vacuum quantum fields in the presence of a reflecting boundary, J. High Energ. Phys. 2023, 184 (2023)

    2023

  57. [57]

    S. H. Li, S. H. Shang, S. M. Wu, Does acceleration always d egrade quantum entanglement for tetra- partite Unruh-DeWitt detectors?, J. High Energ. Phys. 2025, 214 (2025)

    2025

  58. [58]

    Y . Tang, W. Liu, Z. Liu, J. Wang, Can the latent signature s of quantum superposition be detected through correlation harvesting?, J. High Energ. Phys. 2026, 45 (2026)

    2026

  59. [59]

    Ciliberto, S

    G. Ciliberto, S. Emig, N. Pavloff, M. Isoard, Violation of Bell inequalities in an analog black hole, Phys. Rev. A 109, 063325 (2024)

    2024

  60. [60]

    Zhang, X

    T. Zhang, X. Wang and S. M. Fei, Hawking effect can genera te physically inaccessible genuine tripartite nonlocality, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 607 (2023)

    2023

  61. [61]

    G. W. Mi, X. Huang, S. M. Fei, T. Zhang, Genuine four-part ite Bell nonlocality in the curved space- time, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 354 (2025)

    2025

  62. [62]

    S. M. Wu, R. D. Wang, X. L. Huang, Z. Wang, Does gravitatio nal wave assist vacuum steering and Bell nonlocality?, J. High Energ. Phys. 2024, 155 (2024)

    2024

  63. [63]

    S. M. Wu, X. W. Teng, W. M. Li, Y . X. Wang, J. Lu, Nonseparab ility of multipartite systems in dilaton black hole, JCAP 09, 030 (2025). 17

    2025

  64. [64]

    M. M. Du, H. W. Li, S. T. Shen, X. J. Y an, X. Y . Li, L. Zhou, W. Zhong and Y . B. Sheng, Maximal steered coherence in the background of Schwarzschild space -time, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 450 (2024)

    2024

  65. [65]

    C. Y . Liu, Z. W. Long and Q. L. He, Quantum coherence and qu antum Fisher information of Dirac particles in curved spacetime under decoherence, Phys. Let t. B 857, 138991 (2024)

    2024

  66. [66]

    G. W. Mi, X. Huang, S. M. Fei, T. Zhang, Quantumness near t he Schwarzschild black hole based on W-state, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 537, e00397 (2025)

    2025

  67. [67]

    S. M. Wu, C. X. Wang, D. D. Liu, X. L. Huang, H. S. Zeng, Woul d quantum coherence be increased by curvature effect in de Sitter space?, J. High Energ. Phys. 2023, 115 (2023)

    2023

  68. [68]

    X. Liu, Z. Tian, J. Wang, J. Jing, Protecting quantum coh erence of two-level atoms from vacuum fluctuations of electromagnetic field, Ann. Phys. 366, 102 (2016)

    2016

  69. [69]

    M. M. Du, H. W. Li, Z. Tao, S. T. Shen, X. J. Y an, X. Y . Li, W. Z hong, Y . B. Sheng and L. Zhou, Basis-independent quantum coherence and its distribution under relativistic motion, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 838 (2024)

    2024

  70. [70]

    Q. Xiao, Y . Chen, T. Liu, Effects of Lorentz symmetry bre aking on quantum coherence in an expand- ing universe, Phys. Lett. B 872, 140133 (2026)

    2026

  71. [71]

    X. Liu, C. Wen, J. Wang, Quantum coherence of continuous variables in the black hole quantum atmosphere, Phys. Lett. B 873, 140185 (2026)

    2026

  72. [72]

    Shahbazi, S

    F. Shahbazi, S. Haseli, H. Dolatkha, and S. Salimi, Entr opic uncertainty relation in Garfinkle- Horowitz-Strominger dilation black hole, JCAP 10, 047 (2020)

    2020

  73. [73]

    L. J. Li, F. Ming, X. K. Song, L. Y e and D. Wang, Quantumnes s and entropic uncertainty in curved space-time, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 726 (2022)

    2022

  74. [74]

    T. Y . Wang and D. Wang, Entropic uncertainty relations i n Schwarzschild space-time, Phys. Lett. B 855, 138876 (2024)

    2024

  75. [75]

    Y . K. Zhang, L. J. Li, X. K. Song, L. Y e and D. Wang, Entropi c uncertainty and quantum non- classicality of Unruh-Dewitt detectors in relativity, Phy s. Lett. B 858, 139063 (2024)

    2024

  76. [76]

    F. Ming, Z. Q. Xu, T. T. Lu, L. Dong, B. L. Fang, X. Hu, Y . Y u, H. Y ang, D. Wang, Unveiling gravity-induced quantumness by three-measurement uncert ainty relations, Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 85 (2026)

    2026

  77. [77]

    Gonzalez-Raya, S

    T. Gonzalez-Raya, S. Pirandola and M. Sanz, Satellite- based entanglement distribution and quantum teleportation with continuous variables, Commun. Phys. 7, 126 (2024)

    2024

  78. [78]

    S. M. Wu, X. W. Fan, R. D. Wang, H. Y . Wu, X. L. Huang and H. S. Zeng, Does Hawking effect 18 always degrade fidelity of quantum teleportation in Schwarz schild spacetime?, J. High Energ. Phys. 2023, 232 (2023)

    2023

  79. [79]

    G. W. Mi, X. Huang, S. M. Fei, T. Zhang, Impact of the Hawki ng Effect on the fully entangled fraction of three-qubit states in Schwarzschild spacetime , Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 537, 2400308 (2024)

    2024

  80. [80]

    Z. Liu, Y . Li, Z. Tian, J. Wang, Scrambling-Enhanced Qua ntum Battery Charging in Black Hole Analogues, Adv. Sci. 13, e20281 (2025)

    2025

Showing first 80 references.