pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.25243 · v1 · pith:2YW6C6URnew · submitted 2026-05-24 · ✦ hep-th · hep-lat· hep-ph

Quantum-Corrected Q-balls in the Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin Model

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 23:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-lathep-ph
keywords Q-ballsFriedberg-Lee-Sirlin modelHartree approximationquantum fluctuationssoliton stabilityNoether chargereal-time dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum corrections in the Hartree approximation can destabilize Q-balls that remain stable under classical evolution.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines real-time dynamics of Q-balls in the Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin model by evolving mean fields self-consistently with leading quantum two-point functions. These functions are represented numerically through a stochastic ensemble in the inhomogeneous Hartree approximation after a renormalized formulation and classical-limit scaling. Simulations in 3+1 dimensions identify a classical regime with small fluctuations and a quantum regime where fluctuations carry a sizable share of the Noether charge, along with periodic charge exchange between sectors. The central result is the existence of an intermediate parameter window in which classically stable configurations develop instabilities once the Hartree fluctuations are included. This indicates that quantum effects can change the stability properties of soliton solutions beyond what classical theory predicts.

Core claim

Within the inhomogeneous Hartree approximation applied to single-Q-ball configurations in the Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin model, an intermediate window of parameters exists in which configurations that are stable under purely classical evolution become unstable when the self-consistent quantum two-point functions are retained; this instability is accompanied by a transfer of Noether charge into the fluctuation sector.

What carries the argument

The inhomogeneous Hartree approximation, in which mean fields evolve together with quantum two-point functions represented by a stochastic ensemble.

If this is right

  • Quantum fluctuations remain small in a classical regime where the evolution tracks the classical solution closely.
  • In a quantum regime the fluctuation sector carries a sizable fraction of the total Noether charge.
  • Periodic exchange of Noether charge occurs between the mean fields and the fluctuation modes.
  • Classically stable Q-balls can become unstable once Hartree fluctuations are included.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Hartree treatment could be applied to other two-scalar soliton models to test whether similar intermediate instability windows appear.
  • Including next-to-leading quantum corrections might shrink or remove the reported instability window.
  • Classical stability criteria alone may be insufficient to determine the physical lifetime of Q-ball candidates in renormalizable field theories.

Load-bearing premise

The inhomogeneous Hartree approximation implemented via stochastic ensemble is sufficient to capture the leading quantum corrections that affect the stability of single Q-ball configurations.

What would settle it

A lattice simulation or higher-order quantum calculation of the same configurations that shows no instability window in the identified parameter range would falsify the central claim.

read the original abstract

We study the real-time quantum dynamics of Q-balls in the Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin model within the inhomogeneous Hartree approximation. The mean fields are evolved self-consistently with the leading quantum two-point functions, which are implemented numerically through a stochastic ensemble representation. After introducing a renormalized formulation and a classical-limit scaling, we simulate single-Q-ball configurations in $3+1$ dimensions and compare their quantum-corrected evolution with the corresponding classical dynamics. We find a clear separation between a classical regime, where quantum fluctuations remain small and the evolution closely follows the classical solution, and a quantum regime, where the fluctuation sector carries a sizable fraction of the Noether charge. We also observe a periodic exchange of Noether charge between the mean fields and the fluctuation modes within the Hartree approximation. We further investigate the stability of quantum-corrected Q-balls and find an intermediate window in which configurations that are classically stable become unstable once Hartree fluctuations are included. Our results provide a first step toward real-time quantum simulations of Q-balls in renormalizable two-field soliton models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies real-time quantum dynamics of single Q-balls in the Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin model within the inhomogeneous Hartree approximation, implemented numerically via a stochastic ensemble representation of the two-point functions. After a renormalized formulation and classical-limit scaling, the authors simulate 3+1-dimensional configurations, identify a classical regime (small fluctuations) and a quantum regime (fluctuations carrying sizable Noether charge), report periodic charge exchange between mean fields and fluctuations, and claim an intermediate window in which Hartree corrections destabilize configurations that are classically stable.

Significance. If the central numerical results hold under the stated approximation, the work supplies the first controlled real-time simulation of leading quantum corrections to soliton stability in a renormalizable two-field model. The use of a renormalized Hartree formulation with explicit classical-limit scaling and the stochastic-ensemble implementation are concrete methodological strengths that could be built upon for further studies of quantum soliton dynamics.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (quantum regime paragraph): the reported intermediate instability window is load-bearing on the quantitative reliability of the inhomogeneous Hartree truncation once the fluctuation sector carries a sizable fraction of the total Noether charge. The manuscript provides no explicit tests (e.g., ensemble-size convergence, comparison with truncated higher-point functions, or charge-fraction dependence of the growth rates) that would establish the truncation remains accurate in this regime; without such checks the distinction between a controlled quantum correction and an artifact of the two-point closure cannot be assessed.
minor comments (2)
  1. The description of the stochastic ensemble implementation would benefit from an explicit statement of the ensemble size used for the stability runs and any reported statistical error bars on the charge-exchange period and growth rates.
  2. Notation for the renormalized parameters and the classical-limit scaling should be cross-referenced to the defining equations in the methods section for immediate readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and the constructive comment on the scope of the Hartree approximation. We address the concern point by point below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (quantum regime paragraph): the reported intermediate instability window is load-bearing on the quantitative reliability of the inhomogeneous Hartree truncation once the fluctuation sector carries a sizable fraction of the total Noether charge. The manuscript provides no explicit tests (e.g., ensemble-size convergence, comparison with truncated higher-point functions, or charge-fraction dependence of the growth rates) that would establish the truncation remains accurate in this regime; without such checks the distinction between a controlled quantum correction and an artifact of the two-point closure cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that the inhomogeneous Hartree truncation is a controlled but approximate closure and that its quantitative reliability when fluctuations carry a sizable fraction of the Noether charge requires careful qualification. The manuscript does not contain direct comparisons against higher-point truncations; such extensions lie outside the present scope because they would demand an entirely different numerical framework in 3+1 dimensions. Ensemble-size convergence for the stochastic representation was monitored during production runs and the reported phenomenology is stable, but these checks were not presented explicitly. Charge-fraction dependence is explored parametrically by scanning the classical-limit scaling parameter that separates the classical and quantum regimes. In the revised manuscript we will (i) add an appendix with ensemble-size convergence diagnostics, (ii) insert a dedicated paragraph in the discussion section that states the expected range of validity of the two-point closure and notes the absence of higher-order benchmarks as a limitation, and (iii) revise the abstract to emphasize that the intermediate instability window is observed within the Hartree approximation. These changes will make the scope and limitations of the results transparent without altering the central numerical findings. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in numerical Hartree simulations

full rationale

The paper reports direct numerical results from evolving mean fields self-consistently with two-point functions via stochastic ensemble in the inhomogeneous Hartree approximation, after renormalization and classical-limit scaling. No analytical derivation chain exists that reduces predictions to fitted inputs by construction, invokes self-citations for uniqueness theorems, or renames known results. The reported classical/quantum regime separation and stability window are simulation outputs, not tautological inputs. This is self-contained numerical work against external benchmarks, consistent with the default non-circular finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of the inhomogeneous Hartree truncation and on the existence of a renormalized formulation whose details are not visible in the abstract; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are named.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5726 in / 1158 out tokens · 21995 ms · 2026-06-29T23:32:48.911060+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · 47 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Friedberg, T.D

    R. Friedberg, T.D. Lee and A. Sirlin,A Class of Scalar-Field Soliton Solutions in Three Space Dimensions,Phys. Rev. D13(1976) 2739

  2. [2]

    Coleman,Q-balls,Nucl

    S.R. Coleman,Q-balls,Nucl. Phys. B262(1985) 263

  3. [3]

    Rosen,Particlelike Solutions to Nonlinear Complex Scalar Field Theories with Positive-Definite Energy Densities,J

    G. Rosen,Particlelike Solutions to Nonlinear Complex Scalar Field Theories with Positive-Definite Energy Densities,J. Math. Phys.9(1968) 996

  4. [4]

    Zhou,Non-topological solitons and quasi-solitons,Rept

    S.-Y. Zhou,Non-topological solitons and quasi-solitons,Rept. Prog. Phys.88(2025) 046901 [2411.16604]

  5. [5]

    Dynamics of Nontopological Solitons - Q Balls

    M. Axenides, S. Komineas, L. Perivolaropoulos and M. Floratos,Dynamics of nontopological solitons: Q balls,Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 085006 [hep-ph/9910388]

  6. [6]

    Q-ball Dynamics

    R. Battye and P. Sutcliffe,Q-ball dynamics,Nucl. Phys. B590(2000) 329 [hep-th/0003252]

  7. [7]

    Q-balls, Integrability and Duality

    P. Bowcock, D. Foster and P. Sutcliffe,Q-balls, Integrability and Duality,J. Phys. A42 (2009) 085403 [0809.3895]

  8. [8]

    Blaschke, T

    F. Blaschke, T. Roma´ nczukiewicz, K. S lawi´ nska and A. Wereszczy´ nski,Oscillons from Q-Balls through Renormalization,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 081601 [2410.24109]

  9. [9]

    Mart´ ınez, P

    D.C. Mart´ ınez, P. Dorey, T. Rom´ anczukiewicz, P.M. Saffin, K. Slawinska and A. Wereszczy´nski,Oscillons and bubbles in Q-ball dynamics,JHEP12(2025) 154 [2509.03192]

  10. [10]

    Spinning Q-Balls

    M.S. Volkov and E. Wohnert,Spinning Q balls,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 085003 [hep-th/0205157]

  11. [11]

    Rotating Boson Stars and Q-Balls

    B. Kleihaus, J. Kunz and M. List,Rotating boson stars and Q-balls,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 064002 [gr-qc/0505143]

  12. [12]

    Charge-Swapping Q-balls

    E.J. Copeland, P.M. Saffin and S.-Y. Zhou,Charge-Swapping Q-balls,Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014) 231603 [1409.3232]. – 31 –

  13. [13]

    Xie, P.M

    Q.-X. Xie, P.M. Saffin and S.-Y. Zhou,Charge-Swapping Q-balls and Their Lifetimes,JHEP 07(2021) 062 [2101.06988]

  14. [14]

    Hou, P.M

    S.-Y. Hou, P.M. Saffin, Q.-X. Xie and S.-Y. Zhou,Charge-swapping Q-balls in a logarithmic potential and Affleck-Dine condensate fragmentation,JHEP07(2022) 060 [2202.08392]

  15. [15]

    Friedberg and T.D

    R. Friedberg and T.D. Lee,Fermion Field Nontopological Solitons. 2. Models for Hadrons, Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1096

  16. [16]

    Friedberg and T.D

    R. Friedberg and T.D. Lee,QCD and the Soliton Model of Hadrons,Phys. Rev. D18(1978) 2623

  17. [17]

    Rho, A.S

    M. Rho, A.S. Goldhaber and G.E. Brown,Topological Soliton Bag Model for Baryons,Phys. Rev. Lett.51(1983) 747

  18. [18]

    Cahill and C.D

    R.T. Cahill and C.D. Roberts,Soliton Bag Models of Hadrons from QCD,Phys. Rev. D32 (1985) 2419

  19. [19]

    Supersymmetric Q-balls as dark matter

    A. Kusenko and M.E. Shaposhnikov,Supersymmetric Q balls as dark matter,Phys. Lett. B 418(1998) 46 [hep-ph/9709492]

  20. [20]

    Q-Balls and Baryogenesis in the MSSM

    K. Enqvist and J. McDonald,Q balls and baryogenesis in the MSSM,Phys. Lett. B425 (1998) 309 [hep-ph/9711514]

  21. [21]

    Q-ball Formation through Affleck-Dine Mechanism

    S. Kasuya and M. Kawasaki,Q ball formation through Affleck-Dine mechanism,Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 041301 [hep-ph/9909509]

  22. [22]

    New type of stable Q balls in the gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking

    S. Kasuya and M. Kawasaki,A New type of stable Q balls in the gauge mediated SUSY breaking,Phys. Rev. Lett.85(2000) 2677 [hep-ph/0006128]

  23. [23]

    Q-ball candidates for self-interacting dark matter

    A. Kusenko and P.J. Steinhardt,Q ball candidates for selfinteracting dark matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001) 141301 [astro-ph/0106008]

  24. [24]

    Higgsino and Wino Dark Matter from Q-ball Decay in Affleck-Dine Baryogenesis

    M. Fujii and K. Hamaguchi,Higgsino and wino dark matter from Q ball decay,Phys. Lett. B 525(2002) 143 [hep-ph/0110072]

  25. [25]

    Simulations of Q-Ball Formation

    T. Multamaki and I. Vilja,Simulations of Q ball formation,Phys. Lett. B535(2002) 170 [hep-ph/0203195]

  26. [26]

    Large lepton asymmetry from Q-balls

    M. Kawasaki, F. Takahashi and M. Yamaguchi,Large lepton asymmetry from Q balls,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 043516 [hep-ph/0205101]

  27. [27]

    Axino dark matter from Q-balls in Affleck-Dine baryogenesis and the $\Omega_b - \Omega_{DM}$ coincidence problem

    L. Roszkowski and O. Seto,Axino dark matter from Q-balls in Affleck-Dine baryogenesis and the Omega(b) - Omega(DM) coincidence problem,Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 161304 [hep-ph/0608013]

  28. [28]

    Gravitational waves from fragmentation of a primordial scalar condensate into Q-balls

    A. Kusenko and A. Mazumdar,Gravitational waves from fragmentation of a primordial scalar condensate into Q-balls,Phys. Rev. Lett.101(2008) 211301 [0807.4554]

  29. [29]

    Glueball condensates as holographic duals of supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars

    B. Hartmann and J. Riedel,Glueball condensates as holographic duals of supersymmetric Q-balls and boson stars,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 104008 [1204.6239]

  30. [30]

    Q-ball dark matter and baryogenesis in high-scale inflation

    S. Kasuya and M. Kawasaki,Q-ball dark matter and baryogenesis in high-scale inflation, Phys. Lett. B739(2014) 174 [1408.1176]

  31. [31]

    Boˇ skovi´ c and E

    M. Boˇ skovi´ c and E. Barausse,Soliton boson stars, Q-balls and the causal Buchdahl bound, JCAP02(2022) 032 [2111.03870]

  32. [32]

    Pearce, G

    L. Pearce, G. White and A. Kusenko,Generating non-topological solitons via thermal corrections: Higgs balls,JHEP08(2022) 033 [2205.13557]. – 32 –

  33. [33]

    Kawasaki and K

    M. Kawasaki and K. Murai,Enhancement of gravitational waves at Q-ball decay including non-linear density perturbations,JCAP01(2024) 050 [2308.13134]

  34. [34]

    Friedberg, T.D

    R. Friedberg, T.D. Lee and A. Sirlin,Gauge Field Nontopological Solitons in Three Space Dimensions. 1.,Nucl. Phys. B115(1976) 1

  35. [35]

    Friedberg, T.D

    R. Friedberg, T.D. Lee and A. Sirlin,Gauge Field Nontopological Solitons in Three Space Dimensions. 2.,Nucl. Phys. B115(1976) 32

  36. [36]

    Friedberg and T.D

    R. Friedberg and T.D. Lee,Fermion Field Nontopological Solitons. 1.,Phys. Rev. D15 (1977) 1694

  37. [37]

    Lee and Y

    T.D. Lee and Y. Pang,Fermion Soliton Stars and Black Holes,Phys. Rev. D35(1987) 3678

  38. [38]

    Lee and Y

    T.D. Lee and Y. Pang,Nontopological solitons,Phys. Rept.221(1992) 251

  39. [39]

    On U(1)-charged domain walls

    V.A. Lensky, V.A. Gani and A.E. Kudryavtsev,On U(1) charged domain walls,J. Exp. Theor. Phys.93(2001) 677 [hep-th/0104266]

  40. [40]

    Gani, N.B

    V.A. Gani, N.B. Konyukhova, S.V. Kurochkin and V.A. Lensky,Study of stability of a charged topological soliton in the system of two interacting scalar fields,USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys.44(2004) 1968 [0710.2975]

  41. [41]

    Q-balls with scalar charges

    A. Levin and V. Rubakov,Q-balls with scalar charges,Mod. Phys. Lett. A26(2011) 409 [1010.0030]

  42. [42]

    Q-balls without a potential

    V. Loiko, I. Perapechka and Y. Shnir,Q-balls without a potential,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 045018 [1805.11929]

  43. [43]

    Heeck and M

    J. Heeck and M. Sokhashvili,Revisiting the Friedberg–Lee–Sirlin soliton model,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 526 [2303.09566]

  44. [44]

    Azatov, Q.T

    A. Azatov, Q.T. Ho and M.M. Khalil,Q-ball perturbations with more details: Linear analysis vs lattice,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 096010 [2412.13885]

  45. [45]

    Lee and S.U

    C.H. Lee and S.U. Yoon,Existence and Stability of Gauged Nontopological Solitons,Mod. Phys. Lett. A6(1991) 1479

  46. [46]

    Loiko and Y

    V. Loiko and Y. Shnir,Q-balls in theU(1)gauged Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin model,Phys. Lett. B 797(2019) 134810 [1906.01943]

  47. [47]

    Friedberg, T.D

    R. Friedberg, T.D. Lee and Y. Pang,Scalar Soliton Stars and Black Holes,Phys. Rev. D35 (1987) 3658

  48. [48]

    J. Kunz, I. Perapechka and Y. Shnir,Kerr black holes with synchronised scalar hair and boson stars in the Einstein-Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin model,JHEP07(2019) 109 [1904.13379]

  49. [49]

    J. Kunz, V. Loiko and Y. Shnir,U(1) gauged boson stars in the Einstein-Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin model,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 085013 [2112.06626]

  50. [50]

    Kunz and Y

    J. Kunz and Y. Shnir,Charged hairy black holes in the gauged Einstein-Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin model,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 104062 [2303.16562]

  51. [51]

    de S´ a, H.C.D

    P.L.B. de S´ a, H.C.D. Lima, Jr., C.A.R. Herdeiro and L.C.B. Crispino,Static boson stars in the Einstein-Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin theory and their astrophysical images,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 104047 [2406.02695]

  52. [52]

    Jaramillo and S.-Y

    V. Jaramillo and S.-Y. Zhou,Dipoles and chains of solitons in the Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin model,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 024027 [2411.08985]

  53. [53]

    Small Q balls

    A. Kusenko,Small Q balls,Phys. Lett. B404(1997) 285 [hep-th/9704073]. – 33 –

  54. [54]

    Quantum Corrections to Q-Balls

    N. Graham,Quantum corrections to Q balls,Phys. Lett. B513(2001) 112 [hep-th/0105009]

  55. [55]

    On the quantum stability of Q-balls

    A. Tranberg and D.J. Weir,On the quantum stability of Q-balls,JHEP04(2014) 184 [1310.7487]

  56. [56]

    The fate of small classically stable Q-balls

    D. Levkov, E. Nugaev and A. Popescu,The fate of small classically stable Q-balls,JHEP12 (2017) 131 [1711.05279]

  57. [57]

    Vibrational modes of Q-balls

    A. Kovtun, E. Nugaev and A. Shkerin,Vibrational modes of Q-balls,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 096016 [1805.03518]

  58. [58]

    Kovtun,Analytical computation of quantum corrections to a nontopological soliton within the saddle-point approximation,Phys

    A. Kovtun,Analytical computation of quantum corrections to a nontopological soliton within the saddle-point approximation,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 036011 [2110.05222]

  59. [59]

    Xie, P.M

    Q.-X. Xie, P.M. Saffin, A. Tranberg and S.-Y. Zhou,Quantum corrected Q-ball dynamics, JHEP01(2024) 165 [2312.01139]

  60. [60]

    Ogundipe and J

    K. Ogundipe and J. Evslin,Perturbative approach to time-dependent quantum solitons, JHEP06(2024) 174 [2403.13232]

  61. [61]

    E. Kim, E. Nugaev and Y. Shnir,Large solitons flattened by small quantum corrections, Phys. Lett. B856(2024) 138881 [2405.09262]

  62. [62]

    Quantum Oscillons are Long-Lived

    J. Evslin, K. Slawi´ nska, T. Roma´ nczukiewicz and A. Wereszczy´ nski,Quantum Oscillons are Long-Lived,2512.17193

  63. [63]

    Thermalization in a Hartree Ensemble Approximation to Quantum Field dynamics

    M. Salle, J. Smit and J.C. Vink,Thermalization in a Hartree ensemble approximation to quantum field dynamics,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 025016 [hep-ph/0012346]

  64. [64]

    Cornwall, R

    J.M. Cornwall, R. Jackiw and E. Tomboulis,Effective Action for Composite Operators,Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 2428

  65. [65]

    Introduction to Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory

    J. Berges,Introduction to nonequilibrium quantum field theory,AIP Conf. Proc.739(2004) 3 [hep-ph/0409233]

  66. [66]

    Hydrodynamic scaling from the dynamics of relativistic quantum field theory

    L.M.A. Bettencourt, F. Cooper and K. Pao,Relativistic hydrodynamic scaling from the dynamics of quantum field theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.89(2002) 112301 [hep-ph/0109108]

  67. [67]

    Dynamical behavior of spatially inhomogeneous relativistic $\lambda \phi^4$ quantum field theory in the Hartree approximation

    L.M.A. Bettencourt, K. Pao and J.G. Sanderson,Dynamical behavior of spatially inhomogeneous relativistic lambda phi**4 quantum field theory in the Hartree approximation, Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 025015 [hep-ph/0104210]

  68. [68]

    A Step Beyond the Bounce: Bubble Dynamics in Quantum Phase Transitions

    Y. Bergner and L.M.A. Bettencourt,A Step beyond the bounce: Bubble dynamics in quantum phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 025014 [hep-ph/0206053]

  69. [69]

    Dressing Up the Kink

    Y. Bergner and L.M.A. Bettencourt,Dressing up the kink,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 045002 [hep-th/0305190]

  70. [70]

    Kinks in the Hartree approximation

    M. Salle,Kinks in the Hartree approximation,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 025005 [hep-ph/0307080]

  71. [71]

    Semiclassical decay of topological defects

    S. Borsanyi and M. Hindmarsh,Semiclassical decay of topological defects,Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 045022 [0712.0300]

  72. [72]

    Oscillon Lifetime in the Presence of Quantum Fluctuations

    P.M. Saffin, P. Tognarelli and A. Tranberg,Oscillon Lifetime in the Presence of Quantum Fluctuations,JHEP08(2014) 125 [1401.6168]

  73. [73]

    Low-cost fermions in classical field simulations

    S. Borsanyi and M. Hindmarsh,Low-cost fermions in classical field simulations,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 065010 [0809.4711]. – 34 –

  74. [74]

    Quantum theory of fermion production after inflation

    J. Berges, D. Gelfand and J. Pruschke,Quantum theory of fermion production after inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011) 061301 [1012.4632]

  75. [75]

    Real-time Fermions for Baryogenesis Simulations

    P.M. Saffin and A. Tranberg,Real-time Fermions for Baryogenesis Simulations,JHEP07 (2011) 066 [1105.5546]

  76. [76]

    Dynamical simulations of electroweak baryogenesis with fermions

    P.M. Saffin and A. Tranberg,Dynamical simulations of electroweak baryogenesis with fermions,JHEP02(2012) 102 [1111.7136]

  77. [77]

    Simulating fermion production in 1+1 dimensional QED

    F. Hebenstreit, J. Berges and D. Gelfand,Simulating fermion production in 1+1 dimensional QED,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 105006 [1302.5537]

  78. [78]

    Quantum fields in boson star spacetime

    P.M. Saffin and Q.-X. Xie,Quantum fields in boson star spacetime,2601.05129

  79. [79]

    Press,Numerical recipes 3rd edition: The art of scientific computing, Cambridge university press (2007)

    W.H. Press,Numerical recipes 3rd edition: The art of scientific computing, Cambridge university press (2007)

  80. [80]

    Coleman,Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K

    S. Coleman,Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (1985), 10.1017/CBO9780511565045

Showing first 80 references.