Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 30 references

Nearly optimal early stopping for Deep Image Prior becomes possible by using two independent noisy copies of the degraded image or pseudo approximations of them.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review

2026-06-30 11:30 UTC pith:HNHB3ILW

load-bearing objection The paper's main contribution is a pseudo self-referenced construction that lets you run variance-based early stopping for DIP from one measurement instead of needing two independent noisy copies. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2605.25299 v2 pith:HNHB3ILW submitted 2026-05-24 cs.CV cs.LG

A Principled Self-Referenced Early Stopping Approach for Deep Image Prior

Chaoyan Huang , Cheng-Han Huang , Ismail R. Alkhouri , Rongrong Wang This is my paper
classification cs.CV cs.LG
keywords Deep Image Priorearly stoppingoverfitting detectioninverse imaging problemsself-referenced imagesimage reconstructionnoisy measurementspseudo-validation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that early stopping in Deep Image Prior can reach near-optimal performance when two independent noisy versions of the input are available for overfitting detection. Because fully independent copies are usually unavailable, it introduces a framework that builds pseudo self-referenced images from a single measurement, producing three specific algorithms for inverse imaging problems. These algorithms are backed by theory on single-reference validation and shared noise, and they work across natural image restoration and medical reconstruction without needing a noise level estimate. A reader would care because DIP otherwise overfits quickly due to over-parameterization, and better stopping rules make the method usable in practice.

Core claim

The central claim is that nearly optimal DIP early stopping can be achieved when two independent noisy copies of the degraded image are available. Motivated by this, and since obtaining two fully independent copies is infeasible, the authors propose an overfitting detection framework based on constructing pseudo self-referenced images, resulting in three IIP-specific algorithms. The approach is supported by theoretical results on single-reference validation, pseudo-validation estimation, and the impact of shared noise, and it consistently outperforms existing early stopping methods across different inverse imaging problems under varying noise levels and types without requiring an accurate no

What carries the argument

Pseudo self-referenced images constructed from a single measurement to approximate the overfitting detection behavior of two independent noisy copies.

Load-bearing premise

The construction of pseudo self-referenced images from a single measurement can reliably approximate the behavior of two independent noisy copies for overfitting detection.

What would settle it

Run the proposed algorithms and the two-copy oracle on the same degraded images and check whether the reconstruction quality at the detected stopping points is statistically indistinguishable.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Improved stability in DIP reconstructions for natural image restoration and medical image tasks.
  • Early stopping decisions without any estimate of the noise level.
  • Outperformance over variance-fluctuation tracking methods under different noise types and levels.
  • Three concrete algorithms tailored to inverse imaging problems that avoid premature stopping.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same pseudo-reference idea could be tested on other over-parameterized generative models used for inverse problems.
  • It may connect to cross-validation strategies already common in supervised learning, but adapted to the unsupervised DIP setting.
  • If the approximation holds, practitioners could apply the method directly to real single-shot measurements in clinical or remote-sensing pipelines.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that nearly optimal DIP early stopping can be achieved when two independent noisy copies of the degraded image are available. Since obtaining such copies is infeasible, it proposes an overfitting detection framework based on constructing pseudo self-referenced images from a single measurement, yielding three IIP-specific algorithms. The approach is supported by theoretical results on single-reference validation, pseudo-validation estimation, and the impact of shared noise, and empirically outperforms existing DIP early stopping methods across natural image restoration, medical image reconstruction, and varying noise levels/types without requiring a noise level estimate.

Significance. If the pseudo self-referenced construction produces variance fluctuations whose timing and magnitude reliably match those of independent copies, the work would deliver a practical, noise-level-free early stopping method that improves stability over single-image variance tracking. The explicit theoretical treatment of shared noise and the consistent cross-IIP empirical gains would be notable strengths for DIP reliability in inverse problems.

major comments (2)
  1. [theoretical results on pseudo-validation estimation and shared noise] The central claim pivots on the pseudo self-referenced images approximating the variance-based overfitting signal of truly independent copies. The abstract cites theory on pseudo-validation estimation and shared-noise impact, yet any residual correlation from the construction (e.g., deterministic splitting or shared high-frequency content) could shift the detected stopping point; a quantitative bound or ablation quantifying the approximation error on the stopping time is needed to secure the performance gains.
  2. [empirical evaluation across IIPs] The abstract states consistent outperformance “across different IIPs … and under varying noise levels and noise types,” but without details on whether algorithm hyperparameters or pseudo-image construction choices were tuned per experiment, it is unclear whether the reported gains are robust or partly post-hoc; explicit cross-validation or sensitivity analysis on these choices would be required to support the claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. The three IIP-specific algorithms are referenced but not named or briefly characterized in the abstract; adding their names and one-sentence distinctions would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. The two major comments highlight opportunities to strengthen the theoretical and empirical support for our pseudo self-referenced early-stopping framework. We address each point below and propose targeted revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [theoretical results on pseudo-validation estimation and shared noise] The central claim pivots on the pseudo self-referenced images approximating the variance-based overfitting signal of truly independent copies. The abstract cites theory on pseudo-validation estimation and shared-noise impact, yet any residual correlation from the construction (e.g., deterministic splitting or shared high-frequency content) could shift the detected stopping point; a quantitative bound or ablation quantifying the approximation error on the stopping time is needed to secure the performance gains.

    Authors: We agree that quantifying the approximation error on stopping time would further secure the claims. Section 4 derives that the pseudo-validation estimator remains consistent when the shared-noise component is bounded by the construction procedure, and the bias term vanishes as the network capacity grows. Nevertheless, an explicit numerical bound on the stopping-time deviation is not provided. We will add a new subsection with a synthetic experiment that generates truly independent copies and reports the distribution of stopping-time differences, thereby supplying the requested quantitative assessment. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [empirical evaluation across IIPs] The abstract states consistent outperformance “across different IIPs … and under varying noise levels and noise types,” but without details on whether algorithm hyperparameters or pseudo-image construction choices were tuned per experiment, it is unclear whether the reported gains are robust or partly post-hoc; explicit cross-validation or sensitivity analysis on these choices would be required to support the claim.

    Authors: All algorithmic hyperparameters and pseudo-image construction parameters were fixed once after a small pilot study on two natural-image instances and then held constant for every subsequent experiment (natural, medical, and all noise levels/types). This design choice was made precisely to demonstrate robustness rather than per-dataset tuning. To make this explicit and address the concern, we will insert a dedicated sensitivity-analysis paragraph together with a supplementary table showing performance variation when the key parameters are perturbed by ±20 % around the chosen values. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's chain begins with an external observation that two independent noisy copies enable nearly optimal DIP early stopping, then motivates a pseudo self-referenced construction from one measurement, supported by separate theoretical results on single-reference validation and shared-noise impact. No equations or steps are shown that define the stopping criterion in terms of itself, rename a fitted quantity as a prediction, or reduce the central claim to a self-citation chain. The derivation remains self-contained against the stated external benchmark of independent copies.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are detailed beyond the high-level motivation and proposal.

reviewed 2026-06-30 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Principled Self-Referenced Early Stopping Approach for Deep Image Prior." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HNHB3ILW

@misc{pith2026260525299,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Principled Self-Referenced Early Stopping Approach for Deep Image Prior},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HNHB3ILW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.25299}
}
Share X LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Recently, Deep Image Prior (DIP) has demonstrated strong capabilities for solving inverse imaging problems (IIPs) by optimizing a randomly initialized convolutional neural network in a training-data-free regime. However, DIP suffers from overfitting to noisy measurements due to network over-parameterization, making early stopping (ES) essential. The most successful ES method tracks fluctuations in the running variance of the network output to detect overfitting. However, in many applications, these fluctuations may appear prematurely, leading to unstable reconstructions. In this paper, we first show that nearly optimal DIP early stopping can be achieved when two independent noisy copies of the degraded image are available. Motivated by this observation, and since obtaining two fully independent copies is infeasible, we propose an overfitting detection framework based on constructing pseudo self-referenced images, resulting in three IIP-specific algorithms. Our approach is further supported by theoretical results on single-reference validation, pseudo-validation estimation, and the impact of shared noise. Across different IIPs, ranging from natural image restoration to medical image reconstruction, and under varying noise levels and noise types, our methods consistently outperform existing DIP early stopping approaches, all without requiring an accurate estimate of the noise level.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.25299 by Chaoyan Huang, Cheng-Han Huang, Ismail R. Alkhouri, Rongrong Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Denoising result on Gaussian noise with noise level [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Color image denoising results. Image corrupted by Gaussian noise with noise level [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Image restoration results of the WMV and our CSR method. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Early stop for image denoising. First row is the nature image from Set18 corrupted by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Image denoising results on Poisson noise. Comparison of WMV-ES and our ACR-ES. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Image denoising results on Gaussian noise. Comparison of WMV-ES and our ACR-ES. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Image denoising results on Gaussian noise. Comparison of WMV-ES and our ACR-ES. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Image denoising results on Impulse noise. Comparison of WMV-ES and our MR-ES. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of different training curves of WMV-ES and the proposed reference-based [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of different training curves of SURE, WMV-ES, and the proposed reference [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_10.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Decomposed diffusion sampler for acceler- ating large-scale inverse problems

    Hyungjin Chung, Suhyeon Lee, and Jong Chul Ye. Decomposed diffusion sampler for acceler- ating large-scale inverse problems. InICLR, pages 1–28, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Solving inverse problems using data-driven models in medical imaging.Acta Numerica, 28:1–174, 2019

    Simon Arridge, Peter Maass, Ozan Öktem, and Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb. Solving inverse problems using data-driven models in medical imaging.Acta Numerica, 28:1–174, 2019. 10

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Gravita- tionally lensed black hole emission tomography

    Aviad Levis, Pratul P Srinivasan, Andrew A Chael, Ren Ng, and Katherine L Bouman. Gravita- tionally lensed black hole emission tomography. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Deep learning in remote sensing: A comprehensive review and list of resources

    XiaoXiangZhu,DevisTuia,LichaoMou,Gui-SongXia,LiangpeiZhang,FengXu,andFriedrich Fraundorfer. Deep learning in remote sensing: A comprehensive review and list of resources. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 5(4):8–36, 2017

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Dmplug: A plug-inmethodforsolvinginverseproblemswithdiffusionmodels

    Hengkang Wang, Xu Zhang, Taihui Li, Yuxiang Wan, Tiancong Chen, and Ju Sun. Dmplug: A plug-inmethodforsolvinginverseproblemswithdiffusionmodels. InTheThirty-eighthAnnual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Beyond a gaussian denoiser: Residual learning of deep cnn for image denoising.IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 26(7):3142–3155, 2017

    Kai Zhang, Wangmeng Zuo, Yunjin Chen, Deyu Meng, and Lei Zhang. Beyond a gaussian denoiser: Residual learning of deep cnn for image denoising.IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 26(7):3142–3155, 2017

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Engl, Martin Hanke, and Andreas Neubauer.Regularization of Inverse Problems

    Heinz W. Engl, Martin Hanke, and Andreas Neubauer.Regularization of Inverse Problems. Springer, 1996

    work page 1996

  8. [8]

    Convolutional neural networks for inverse problems in imaging: A review.IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 34(6):85–95, 2017

    Michael T McCann, Kyong Hwan Jin, and Michael Unser. Convolutional neural networks for inverse problems in imaging: A review.IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 34(6):85–95, 2017

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Institute of Physics Publishing, 1998

    Mario Bertero and Patrizia Boccacci.Introduction to Inverse Problems in Imaging. Institute of Physics Publishing, 1998

    work page 1998

  10. [10]

    Recurrent variational network: A deep learning inverse problem solver applied to the task of accelerated mri recon- struction

    George Yiasemis, Jan-Jakob Sonke, Clarisa Sánchez, and Jonas Teuwen. Recurrent variational network: A deep learning inverse problem solver applied to the task of accelerated mri recon- struction. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 732–741, June 2022

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Rare: Image reconstruction using deep priors learned without groundtruth.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 14(6):1088–1099, 2020

    Jiaming Liu, Yu Sun, Cihat Eldeniz, Weijie Gan, Hongyu An, and Ulugbek S Kamilov. Rare: Image reconstruction using deep priors learned without groundtruth.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 14(6):1088–1099, 2020

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.01975 , year=

    Hyungjin Chung, Jeongsol Kim, and Jong Chul Ye. Diffusion models for inverse problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.01975, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Where do we stand with implicit neural representations? a technical and performance survey.Transactions on Machine Learning Research

    Amer Essakine, Yanqi Cheng, Chun-Wun Cheng, Lipei Zhang, Zhongying Deng, Lei Zhu, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb, and Angelica I Aviles-Rivero. Where do we stand with implicit neural representations? a technical and performance survey.Transactions on Machine Learning Research

    work page

  14. [14]

    Deep image prior

    Dmitry Ulyanov, Andrea Vedaldi, and Victor Lempitsky. Deep image prior. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 9446–9454, 2018

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Nerp: Implicit neural representation learning with prior embedding for sparsely sampled image reconstruction.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2022

    Liyue Shen, John Pauly, and Lei Xing. Nerp: Implicit neural representation learning with prior embedding for sparsely sampled image reconstruction.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2022

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Learning transferable features for implicit neural represen- tations

    Kushal Vyas, Ahmed Imtiaz Humayun, Aniket Dashpute, Richard G Baraniuk, Ashok Veer- araghavan, and Guha Balakrishnan. Learning transferable features for implicit neural represen- tations. 2025

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Luca De Luigi, Adriano Cardace, Riccardo Spezialetti, Pierluigi Zama Ramirez, Samuele Salti, and Luigi Di Stefano

    Luca De Luigi, Adriano Cardace, Riccardo Spezialetti, Pierluigi Zama Ramirez, Samuele Salti, and Luigi Di Stefano. Deep learning on implicit neural representations of shapes.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.05438, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Ad- vances in neural rendering

    Ayush Tewari, Justus Thies, Ben Mildenhall, Pratul Srinivasan, Edgar Tretschk, Wang Yifan, Christoph Lassner, Vincent Sitzmann, Ricardo Martin-Brualla, Stephen Lombardi, et al. Ad- vances in neural rendering. InComputer Graphics Forum, volume 41, pages 703–735. Wiley Online Library, 2022. 11

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Implicit neural representation in medical imaging: A comparative survey

    Amirali Molaei, Amirhossein Aminimehr, Armin Tavakoli, Amirhossein Kazerouni, Bobby Azad, Reza Azad, and Dorit Merhof. Implicit neural representation in medical imaging: A comparative survey. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 2381–2391, 2023

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Deepdecoder: Conciseimagerepresentationsfromuntrainednon-convolutional networks

    RHeckeletal. Deepdecoder: Conciseimagerepresentationsfromuntrainednon-convolutional networks. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, page 2736–2750, 2019

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Deep image prior for medical image denoising, a study about parameter initialization.Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 8:995225, 2022

    Davide Sapienza, Giorgia Franchini, Elena Govi, Marko Bertogna, and Marco Prato. Deep image prior for medical image denoising, a study about parameter initialization.Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 8:995225, 2022

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    A baseline method for removing invisible image watermarks using deep image prior.Transactions on Machine Learning Research (TMLR), 2025

    Hengyue Liang, Taihui Li, and Ju Sun. A baseline method for removing invisible image watermarks using deep image prior.Transactions on Machine Learning Research (TMLR), 2025

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Deep random projector: Accelerated deep image prior

    Taihui Li, Hengkang Wang, Zhong Zhuang, and Ju Sun. Deep random projector: Accelerated deep image prior. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18176–18185, 2023

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Image reconstruction via autoencoding sequential deep image prior

    IsmailAlkhouri,ShijunLiang,EvanBell,QingQu,RongrongWang,andSaiprasadRavishankar. Image reconstruction via autoencoding sequential deep image prior. InAdvances in neural information processing systems (NeurIPS), 2024

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Early stoppingfordeepimageprior.TransactionsonMachineLearningResearch,pages1–40,2023

    Hengkang Wang, Taihui Li, Zhong Zhuang, Tiancong Chen, Hengyue Liang, and Ju Sun. Early stoppingfordeepimageprior.TransactionsonMachineLearningResearch,pages1–40,2023. ISSN 2835-8856. URLhttps://openreview.net/forum?id=231ZzrLC8X

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Understanding untrained deep models for inverse problems: Algorithms and theory.IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2025

    Ismail Alkhouri, Evan Bell, Avrajit Ghosh, Shijun Liang, Rongrong Wang, and Saiprasad Ravishankar. Understanding untrained deep models for inverse problems: Algorithms and theory.IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2025

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Analysis of deep image prior and exploiting self-guidance for image reconstruction.IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, 2025

    Shijun Liang, Evan Bell, Qing Qu, Rongrong Wang, and Saiprasad Ravishankar. Analysis of deep image prior and exploiting self-guidance for image reconstruction.IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, 2025

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Image restoration using total variation regularized deep image prior

    Jiaming Liu, Yu Sun, Xiaojian Xu, and Ulugbek S Kamilov. Image restoration using total variation regularized deep image prior. InICASSP 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 7715–7719. Ieee, 2019

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    MH r log(T /δ) m +σ 2 log(T /δ) m # , where MH :=σsup 1≤t≤T p RH(t) +σ 2. Consequently, if ˆt∈arg min t V mask t , t ⋆ H ∈arg min t RH(t), then RH(ˆt)≤R H(t⋆ H) + 2C

    Dominique Fourdrinier, William E Strawderman, and Martin T Wells.Shrinkage estimation. Springer, 2018. 12 Appendix A. Reference Validation Theory This appendix formalizes the validation principle used in Section 2. Throughout this section, the DIP trajectory{ˆxt(y1)}T t=1 is trained only on y1 =x+η 1, and the reference image is y2 =x+η 2, whereη 2 is inde...

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    The corresponding WMV-ES and MR-ES curves are also given

    We show the noisy image, the reconstruction selected by WMV-ES, the reconstruction selected by MR-ES, and the oracle reconstruction. The corresponding WMV-ES and MR-ES curves are also given. The selected iteration of MR-ES is closer to the oracle iteration. Moreover, we also present the comparison of different training methods among the original DIP, the ...

    work page 2026

This paper was first reviewed by grok-4.3 on June 30, 2026.