pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.25744 · v1 · pith:QVEFICQInew · submitted 2026-05-25 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · cond-mat.stat-mech

Collective deformation of anisotropic particles with internal pulsation

Luca Casagrande , Alessandro Manacorda , Etienne Fodor This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 19:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords active mattercollective deformationnematic orderhydrodynamic descriptiondeformation wavesanisotropic particlespulsationcoarse-graining
0
0 comments X

The pith

Periodic eccentricity drives on elliptical particles produce synchronized deformation waves that organize into collective patterns.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines dense assemblies of elliptical particles whose eccentricity is driven periodically to mimic anisotropic pulsation in contractile cells. Two deformation types are defined, and their interplay with nematic order is mapped in a phase diagram that reveals distinct collective states including deformation waves. A hydrodynamic description is derived by coarse-graining the microscopic dynamics and shown to reproduce the main patterns observed in simulations. This establishes how internal active deformation, when anisotropic and pulsatile, can generate self-organized waves without external forcing.

Core claim

Active anisotropic deformation, implemented as a periodic drive on particle eccentricity whose phase can be varied relative to the nematic field, yields waves that self-organize into various dynamical patterns; the coarse-grained hydrodynamic equations qualitatively capture the main collective states of the underlying particle dynamics.

What carries the argument

Coarse-graining procedure that produces a hydrodynamic description coupling nematic order to the synchronized periodic eccentricity drive.

If this is right

  • Different relative phases between the eccentricity drive and local nematic orientation produce distinct synchronized collective states.
  • The derived hydrodynamic equations reproduce the main microscopic patterns, allowing continuum-level prediction of wave emergence.
  • Active anisotropic pulsation alone is sufficient to generate self-organized deformation waves in dense assemblies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the phase of the drive can be externally controlled, the model suggests a route to steer tissue-scale wave patterns in cardiac or other contractile assemblies.
  • The hydrodynamic reduction may extend to other anisotropic active particles whose internal shape oscillates, offering a general route from microscopic pulsation to macroscopic waves.

Load-bearing premise

Eccentricity of each particle can be treated as an independent periodic drive whose phase relative to the nematic field is freely varied without constraints from particle interactions or volume conservation.

What would settle it

Run particle simulations that enforce area (or volume) conservation during eccentricity pulsation and check whether the predicted collective wave patterns and phase diagram survive or disappear.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.25744 by Alessandro Manacorda, Etienne Fodor, Luca Casagrande.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Parametrization of anisotropic deformable particles. (a) Each ellipse has four degrees of freedom: (i) the position r = (x, y) of their center that evolves in two dimensions, the orientation θ of the long axis l, and the internal degree of freedom ϕ that controls either the long or short axis, respectively l(ϕ) and s(ϕ) [Eqs. (4) and (5)]. (b-d) Elliptical deformation as a function of the internal phase ϕ … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Phase diagrams in terms of synchronisation Rϕ [Eq. (7)], nematic order Rθ [Eq. (8)], and current Υ [Eq. (9)] for squeezing and stretching deformation models (resp. top and bottom rows). Both models feature arrest, cycle, and wave states in comparable parameter regimes. Only the squeezing deformation model entails a nematic phase (Rθ ≃ 1) at a very high density. Parameters: ω = 10, λ = 0.1, L = 100, l0 = 0.… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Hydrodynamic phase diagrams for the cases of (a) squeezing and (b) stretching deformation models. Black lines delinate the regions of existence of disordered (PDNO refers to phase disorder with nematic order), arrested, and cycling (clockwise and counter-clockwise) states at ν = 0; see dashed [Eq. (28)], dotted and dash-dotted [Eq. (29)], and solid [Eq. (30)] lines. To first order in ν, the linear stabilit… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Capturing the emergence of deformation waves in contractile living tissues is a challenge that has recently been tackled with models of actively deformable particles. Inspired by the anisotropic deformation of cardiomyocytes in cardiac tissues, we examine how the pulsation of elliptical particles affects their collective properties in dense assemblies. We introduce two types of deformation where the eccentricity of each particle is subject to a periodic drive, and examine the interplay between nematic order and synchronized deformation via a systematic phase diagram. We derive a hydrodynamic description through a coarse-graining procedure, and show that it qualitatively captures the main collective states of the microscopic dynamics. Overall, our model provides key insights into how an active anisotropic deformation yields waves that self-organize into various dynamical patterns.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a model of elliptical particles whose eccentricity undergoes periodic pulsation in two distinct deformation modes. It studies the resulting collective dynamics in dense assemblies, constructs a phase diagram for the interplay between nematic order and deformation synchronization, derives hydrodynamic equations from a coarse-graining procedure, and reports that the hydrodynamic description qualitatively reproduces the main collective states seen in the microscopic dynamics, with relevance to deformation waves in contractile tissues.

Significance. If the coarse-graining derivation is internally consistent and the hydrodynamic equations capture the microscopic states without circular parameter fitting, the work would supply a useful continuum framework for active anisotropic systems and could inform models of cardiac tissue mechanics. The systematic exploration of phase space is a constructive element, but the validity of the reported patterns rests on the independence of the prescribed deformation drive.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and phase-diagram section] Abstract (paragraph describing the two types of deformation) and phase-diagram section: the central claim that the coarse-grained hydrodynamic equations qualitatively capture the microscopic collective states hinges on treating each particle's eccentricity as an externally prescribed periodic function whose phase can be varied independently relative to the nematic director. In a dense assembly this modeling choice decouples the drive from both area (volume) conservation per particle and from steric/hydrodynamic interactions that would correlate neighboring phases. If these couplings are present, the nematic-deformation coupling terms change and the reported phase diagram and wave patterns may not survive. The manuscript must either justify the independence assumption with explicit checks or incorporate the missing constraints into the microscopic model and re-derive the hydrodynamics.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states that the hydrodynamic description 'qualitatively captures' the states but does not specify which observables (e.g., wave speed, synchronization order parameter, or defect density) were compared; a table or figure quantifying the level of agreement would strengthen the claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments. We address the major concern regarding the prescribed deformation drive below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and phase-diagram section] Abstract (paragraph describing the two types of deformation) and phase-diagram section: the central claim that the coarse-grained hydrodynamic equations qualitatively capture the microscopic collective states hinges on treating each particle's eccentricity as an externally prescribed periodic function whose phase can be varied independently relative to the nematic director. In a dense assembly this modeling choice decouples the drive from both area (volume) conservation per particle and from steric/hydrodynamic interactions that would correlate neighboring phases. If these couplings are present, the nematic-deformation coupling terms change and the reported phase diagram and wave patterns may not survive. The manuscript must either justify the independence assumption with explicit checks or incorporate the missing constraints into the microscopic mode

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that the eccentricity is an externally prescribed periodic function whose phase is set independently of particle interactions. This is an intentional modeling choice in our minimal phenomenological model, intended to capture the internally driven, active pulsation of anisotropic cells (e.g., cardiomyocytes regulated by biochemical signals) while isolating the effects of anisotropic deformation on collective dynamics. The synchronization of deformation phases and the resulting wave patterns emerge dynamically from the nematic ordering and interparticle forces in the simulations, even with fixed drive frequency. We agree that a fully coupled model including area conservation and interaction-induced phase correlations would alter the coupling terms; however, our approach enables a systematic phase diagram and a consistent coarse-graining procedure. In the revised manuscript we will expand the model description and add a dedicated paragraph justifying the independence assumption with references to biological literature on autonomous cell contraction cycles. We will also explicitly state the limitations of the prescribed-drive approximation and its implications for the hydrodynamic equations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: hydrodynamic derivation is independent of microscopic data

full rationale

The paper performs a standard coarse-graining from an explicit microscopic model of pulsating elliptical particles to a hydrodynamic description, then compares the two. No equations or sections are quoted that reduce a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter, a self-definition, or a load-bearing self-citation. The central claim (qualitative capture of collective states) rests on the coarse-graining procedure itself rather than on any input that is redefined as output. The modeling choice of independent eccentricity drives is an assumption, not a circular step. This is the normal non-circular outcome for a derivation that remains self-contained against its own microscopic benchmark.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central claim rests on the unstated modeling choice that eccentricity can be driven independently and periodically.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5646 in / 1117 out tokens · 29900 ms · 2026-06-29T19:29:10.192839+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Marchetti M C, Joanny J F, Ramaswamy S, Liverpool T B, Prost J, Rao M and Simha R A 2013 Rev. Mod. Phys.851143

    2013

  2. [2]

    Fodor E and Marchetti M C 2018Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl504106

  3. [3]

    Helbing D, Farkas I and Vicsek T 2000Nature407487

  4. [4]

    Gu F, Guiselin B, Bain N, Zuriguel I and Bartolo D 2025Nature638112–119

  5. [5]

    Leonardo R D, Angelani L, Dell’Arciprete D, Ruocco G, Iebba V, Schippa S, Conte M P, Mecarini F, Angelis F D and Fabrizio E D 2010Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1079541–9545

  6. [6]

    Commun.44190

    Dell’Arciprete D, Blow M L and Brown A T 2018Nat. Commun.44190

  7. [7]

    Aranson I S 2022Rep. Prog. Phys.85076601

  8. [8]

    Bi D, X Yang M C M and Manning M L 2016Phys. Rev. X6021011

  9. [9]

    Phys.111074

    Bi D, Lopez J H, Schwarz J M and Manning M L 2015Nat. Phys.111074

  10. [10]

    Czajkowski M, Bi D, Manning M L and Marchetti M C 2018Soft Matter145628–5642

  11. [11]

    Vicsek T, Czirok A, Ben-Jacop E, Cohen I and Shochet O 1995Phys. Rev. Lett.751226

  12. [12]

    Toner J and Tu Y 1995Phys. Rev. Lett.754326

  13. [13]

    Cates M E and Tailleur J 2015Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.6219

  14. [14]

    Heisenberg C P and Bella¨ ıche Y 2013Cell153948

  15. [15]

    Myers K M and Elad D 2017WIREs Syst. Biol. Med.91388

  16. [16]

    Karma A 2013Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.4313

  17. [17]

    Christoph J, Chebbok M, Richter C, Schr¨ oder-Schetelig J, Bittihn P, Stein S, Uzelac I, Fenton F H, Hasenfuß G, Jr R F G and Luther S 2018Nature555667

  18. [18]

    Gray R A and Jalife J 1996Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos6415

  19. [19]

    Petrolli V, Goff M L, Tadrous M, Martens K, Allier C, Mandula O, Herv´ e L, Henkes S, Sknepnek R, Boudou T, Cappello G and Balland M 2019Phys. Rev. Lett.122168101

  20. [20]

    Blanchard G B, Murugesu S, Adams R J, Martinez-Arias A and Gorfinkiel N 2010Development 1372743

  21. [21]

    Kruse K and Riveline D 2011Curr. Top. Dev. Biol.9567

  22. [22]

    Tjhung E and Berthier L 2017Phys. Rev. E96050601 Collective deformation of anisotropic particles with internal pulsation17

  23. [23]

    Tjhung E and Kawasaki T 2017Soft Matter13111

  24. [24]

    Brito C, Lerner E and Wyart M 2018Phys. Rev. X8031050

  25. [25]

    Hadjifrangiskou I, Ruske L J and Yeomans J M 2023Soft Matter196664–6670

  26. [26]

    Nejad M R and Yeomans J M 2025Phys. Rev. Res.7043070

  27. [27]

    Hadjifrangiskou I, Thampi S P and Valani R N 2025Phys. Rev. Lett.135068101

  28. [28]

    Manning M L 2023Phys. Rev. Lett.130130002

  29. [29]

    Tjhung E and Berthier L 2017Phys. Rev. E96050601(R)

  30. [30]

    Lett.12840003

    Koyano Y, Kitahata H and Mikhailov A S 2020Europhys. Lett.12840003

  31. [31]

    Togashi Y 2019J. Phys. Chem. B1231481

  32. [32]

    Rep.139455

    Parisi D R, Wiebke L E, Mandl J N and Textor J 2023Sci. Rep.139455

  33. [33]

    Li Z Q, Lei Q L and Ma Y Q 2025Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.122e2421518122

  34. [34]

    Zhang Y and Fodor E 2023Phys. Rev. Lett.131238302

  35. [35]

    Phys.26023017

    hua Liu W, jing Zhu W and quan Ai B 2024New J. Phys.26023017

  36. [36]

    Pi˜ neros W D and Fodor E 2025Phys. Rev. Lett.134038301

  37. [37]

    Banerjee T, Desaleux T, Ranft J and ´Etienne Fodor 2024 arXiv:2407.19955

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Banerjee T, Desaleux T, Ranft J and ´Etienne Fodor 2025 arXiv:2509.19024

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Phys.865

    G¨ oth N and Dzubiella J 2025Commun. Phys.865

  40. [40]

    Zhu W j, Jiang X k, Li J j and Ai B q 2025Phys. Rev. E111044123

  41. [41]

    Li X l and Zhu W j 2025Phys. Rev. E112064407

  42. [42]

    Chiou K K, Rocks J W, Chen C Y, Cho S, Merkus K E, Rajaratnam A, Robison P, Tewari M, Vogel K, Majkut S F, Prosser B L, Discher D E and Liu A J 2016Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1138939–8944

  43. [43]

    Ishihara S, Marcq P and Sugimura K 2017Phys. Rev. E96022418

  44. [44]

    Oyama N, Kawasaki T, Mizuno H and Ikeda A 2019Phys. Rev. Res.1032038(R)

  45. [45]

    Biol.181–21

    Staddon M F, Munro E M and Banerjee S 2022PLoS Comput. Biol.181–21

  46. [46]

    Boocock D, Hirashima T and Hannezo E 2023PRX Life1013001

  47. [47]

    Phys.7167

    P´ erez-Verdugo F, Banks S and Banerjee S 2024Commun. Phys.7167

  48. [48]

    Tang W, Nejad M R, Pegoraro A F, Mahadevan L and Guo M 2025 arXiv:2507.16772

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Koehler L, Sandaltzopoulou E, J¨ ulicher F and Brugu´ es J 2026 arXiv:2601.05907

    work page arXiv 2026

  50. [50]

    Phys.12472

    I Nitsan S D, Lewis Y E, Cohen S and Tzlil S 2016Nat. Phys.12472

  51. [51]

    De Gennes P G and Prost J 1993The physics of liquid crystals(Oxford university press)

  52. [52]

    Commun.93246

    Doostmohammadi A, Ign´ es-Mullol J, Yeomans J M and Sagu´ es F 2018Nat. Commun.93246

  53. [53]

    Gay J G and Berne B J 1981J. Chem. Phys.743316

  54. [54]

    Cleaver D J, Care C M, Allen M P and Neal M P 1996Phys. Rev. E54559

  55. [55]

    Manacorda A and Fodor E 2025Phys. Rev. E111L053401

  56. [56]

    Dean D S 1996J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.29

  57. [57]

    Bertin E, Droz M and Gr´ egoire G 2009J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.42445001

  58. [58]

    Horn R and Johnson C 1990Matrix Analysis(CUP)

  59. [59]

    Stewart G W and Sun J G 1990Matrix Perturbation Theory(AP)