pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.26377 · v1 · pith:JU3YOWP5new · submitted 2026-05-25 · 🪐 quant-ph

Single-Ensemble Multiparameter Squeezing with Qudits

Xiaoshui Lin , Chunlei Qu , Chong Zu , Chuanwei Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 21:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum metrologymultiparameter sensingquditssqueezingquantum Fisher informationtrapped ionsmagnetic field sensing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Promoting sensors from qubits to qudits allows a single ensemble to perform simultaneous multiparameter squeezing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to establish that a single collective ensemble of sensors can achieve squeezing across multiple parameters simultaneously, a capability previously restricted to single-parameter cases or requiring multiple separate ensembles. By replacing qubits with qudits of dimension d greater than 2, the authors create a framework in which the single-site quantum Fisher information matrix alone fixes the optimal product probe states, the global readout observables, and the squeezing parameters for the entire ensemble. They give an explicit minimal construction for two-parameter vector magnetic field sensing with d=3 qutrits and identify a collective twisting-like Hamiltonian that produces the required states, with numerical simulations showing metrological improvement that scales with ensemble size. A sympathetic reader cares because the result points to a simpler hardware architecture for multiparameter metrology that uses only one ensemble and global readout.

Core claim

A single ensemble of qudits supports simultaneous multiparameter squeezing, with the optimal product probe state, global readout observables, and squeezing parameters all determined from the single-site quantum Fisher information matrix. For two-parameter vector magnetic field sensing a minimal construction with local dimension d=3 is presented, together with a collective twisting-like interacting Hamiltonian that generates the states; numerical results for a trapped-ion qutrit chain with power-law interactions show up to 12 dB enhancement for N=256 sensors.

What carries the argument

The single-site quantum Fisher information matrix, which fixes the optimal product probe state, the global readout observables, and the squeezing parameters for the collective qudit ensemble.

If this is right

  • A minimal construction with local dimension d=3 enables two-parameter vector magnetic field sensing in one ensemble.
  • A collective twisting-like Hamiltonian generates the required multiparameter-squeezed states.
  • Numerical simulations demonstrate scalable metrological gain up to N=256 sensors.
  • The single-ensemble approach offers a potential advantage over distributed multi-ensemble strategies when the total number of sensors is fixed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Increasing qudit dimension beyond three may allow squeezing of more than two parameters within the same single-ensemble framework.
  • The same single-site matrix construction could be tested with interaction Hamiltonians other than power-law couplings.
  • Whether the global readout remains optimal once realistic decoherence or readout noise is added is left open for direct simulation or experiment.
  • The fixed-sensor-budget comparison with distributed architectures suggests checking whether the qudit route also reduces the number of required control lines or laser beams.

Load-bearing premise

The single-site quantum Fisher information matrix fully determines the optimal product probe state, the corresponding global readout observables, and the associated squeezing parameters for the collective ensemble of qudits.

What would settle it

An experiment realizing the proposed twisting Hamiltonian on a chain of qutrits and measuring no metrological gain above the single-parameter limit for two-parameter vector field sensing would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26377 by Chong Zu, Chuanwei Zhang, Chunlei Qu, Xiaoshui Lin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of qudits and their phase space formed by the collective traceless SU( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) (b) Dynamics of measurement operators [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum-enhanced multiparameter sensing is often associated with distributed architectures or 2-anticoherent states, whereas squeezing in a single collective ensemble is typically limited to single-parameter metrology. Here, we show that a single ensemble can support simultaneous multiparameter squeezing when each sensor is promoted from a qubit to a qudit (i.e., spin with $d$ energy levels). We develop a general framework in which the optimal product probe state, the corresponding global readout observables, and the associated squeezing parameters are all determined from the single-site quantum Fisher information matrix. We then present a minimal qudit construction for two-parameter vector magnetic field sensing with local dimension $d=3$. We further identify a collective twisting-like interacting Hamiltonian that generates such multiparameter-squeezed states and numerically demonstrate scalable metrological gain. In particular, for a trapped-ion qutrit chain with power-law interactions, we obtain up to 12 dB enhancement in two-parameter sensing for $N=256$ sensors. Our results establish qudit-enabled multiparameter squeezing in a single ensemble as a distinct route to multiparameter quantum metrology with global readout, and highlight its potential advantage over distributed multi-ensemble strategies in the fixed-sensor-budget regime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that promoting sensors from qubits to qudits enables simultaneous multiparameter squeezing within a single collective ensemble, in contrast to typical single-parameter limits or distributed architectures. It develops a general framework in which the single-site quantum Fisher information matrix determines the optimal product probe state, the corresponding global readout observables, and the associated squeezing parameters. A minimal d=3 construction is given for two-parameter vector magnetic field sensing, together with a collective twisting-like Hamiltonian that generates the states; numerical results for a trapped-ion qutrit chain with power-law interactions report up to 12 dB metrological gain for N=256 sensors.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work identifies a distinct route to multiparameter quantum metrology that retains global readout and a single ensemble, with potential practical advantage in the fixed-sensor-budget regime over distributed multi-ensemble strategies. The numerical demonstration at N=256 constitutes a concrete strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [general framework (as stated in abstract and introduction)] The general framework (abstract and main text): the assertion that the single-site quantum Fisher information matrix fully determines the optimal global readout observables and squeezing parameters for the collective ensemble is load-bearing for the central claim. Multiparameter generators generally fail to commute; while the collective QFIM equals N times the single-site matrix for product states, the optimality of the global observables under the twisting Hamiltonian and the achievable variances may require additional commutation relations or many-body corrections not encoded in the single-site matrix. No explicit verification is supplied for the d=3 vector-field construction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [general framework (as stated in abstract and introduction)] The general framework (abstract and main text): the assertion that the single-site quantum Fisher information matrix fully determines the optimal global readout observables and squeezing parameters for the collective ensemble is load-bearing for the central claim. Multiparameter generators generally fail to commute; while the collective QFIM equals N times the single-site matrix for product states, the optimality of the global observables under the twisting Hamiltonian and the achievable variances may require additional commutation relations or many-body corrections not encoded in the single-site matrix. No explicit verification is supplied for the d=3 vector-field construction.

    Authors: We agree that non-commuting generators pose a challenge in multiparameter metrology and that the collective QFIM being N times the single-site QFIM for product states is a starting point rather than a complete guarantee of optimality. In the framework, the single-site QFIM is used to identify the optimal local probe state (via its eigenvectors and eigenvalues) and to define the corresponding local generators; the global readout observables are then the collective sums of these local operators, whose variances for product states are directly determined by the single-site quantities without additional many-body corrections. The twisting Hamiltonian is constructed to generate squeezing precisely along the directions selected by the QFIM, respecting the commutation relations of the chosen generators for the d=3 case. The d=3 vector-field construction is derived explicitly in the main text, with the resulting QFIM and squeezing parameters shown to saturate the bound for the chosen state. To address the concern directly, we will add a new subsection providing explicit verification that the global observables achieve the QFIM-predicted variances under the twisting dynamics for the d=3 construction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: framework derives from single-site QFIM properties without reduction to inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper constructs its general framework directly from the single-site quantum Fisher information matrix to determine product probe states, global readout observables, and squeezing parameters for qudit ensembles. The abstract and provided text contain no self-citations, no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, no ansatz smuggled via prior work, and no self-definitional loops where outputs are presupposed in the inputs. The d=3 construction, twisting Hamiltonian, and numerical results for N=256 are presented as consequences of the QFIM-based framework rather than tautological restatements. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external quantum metrology benchmarks, with no load-bearing steps reducing by construction to the paper's own fitted values or citations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that the single-site QFIM extends directly to determine collective optimal states and observables for multiparameter squeezing; no free parameters or invented entities are identified from the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The single-site quantum Fisher information matrix determines the optimal product probe state, global readout observables, and squeezing parameters for the collective qudit ensemble.
    This is the foundational step of the general framework presented in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5753 in / 1299 out tokens · 39066 ms · 2026-06-29T21:09:40.861355+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  2. [2]

    Pezz` e, A

    L. Pezz` e, A. Smerzi, M. K. Oberthaler, R. Schmied, and P. Treutlein, Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 035005 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    DeMille, N

    D. DeMille, N. R. Hutzler, A. M. Rey, and T. Zelevinsky, Quantum sensing and metrology for fundamental physics with molecules, Nat. Phys.20, 741 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    Montenegro, C

    V. Montenegro, C. Mukhopadhyay, R. Yousefjani, S. Sarkar, U. Mishra, M. G. Paris, and A. Bayat, Re- view: Quantum metrology and sensing with many-body systems, Phys. Rep.1134, 1 (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    Kitazawa, Y

    S. Kitazawa, Y. Matsuzaki, S. Saijo, K. Kakuyanagi, S. Saito, and J. Ishi-Hayase, Vector-magnetic-field sens- ing via multifrequency control of nitrogen-vacancy cen- ters in diamond, Phys. Rev. A96, 042115 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    Weggler, C

    T. Weggler, C. Ganslmayer, F. Frank, T. Eilert, F. Jelezko, and J. Michaelis, Determination of the three- dimensional magnetic field vector orientation with nitro- gen vacany centers in diamond, Nano Letters20, 2980 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Lamba, A

    P. Lamba, A. Rana, S. Halder, S. Dhomkar, D. Suter, and R. K. Kamineni, Vector detection of ac magnetic fields by nitrogen vacancy centers of single orientation in diamond, Phys. Rev. B109, 195424 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    Y. Wang, H. Shen, Z. Liu, Y. Yu, S. Du, C. Zu, and C. Zhang, Simultaneous determination of local magnetic fields and sensor orientation with nitrogen-vacancy cen- ters in nanodiamond (2025), arXiv:2507.05366 [quant- ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Zhang, T

    J. Zhang, T. Chen, C. Wei, Z. Ou, H. Yue, and Y. Liu, Single-beam three-axis serf atomic magnetometer based on coordinate system rotation, Opt. Express32, 17165 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    Pradhan, Three axis vector atomic magnetometer utilizing polarimetric technique, Rev

    S. Pradhan, Three axis vector atomic magnetometer utilizing polarimetric technique, Rev. Sci. Instrum.87, 093105 (2016)

    2016

  11. [11]

    X. Meng, Y. Zhang, X. Zhang, S. Jin, T. Wang, L. Jiang, L. Xiao, S. Jia, and Y. Xiao, Machine learning assisted vector atomic magnetometry, Nat. Commun.14, 6105 (2023)

    2023

  12. [12]

    T. Wang, W. Lee, M. Limes, T. Kornack, E. Foley, and M. Romalis, Pulsed vector atomic magnetometer using an alternating fast-rotating field, Nat. Commun.16, 1374 6 (2025)

    2025

  13. [13]

    Kolenderski and R

    P. Kolenderski and R. Demkowicz-Dobrzanski, Optimal state for keeping reference frames aligned and the pla- tonic solids, Phys. Rev. A78, 052333 (2008)

    2008

  14. [14]

    Baumgratz and A

    T. Baumgratz and A. Datta, Quantum enhanced estima- tion of a multidimensional field, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 030801 (2016)

    2016

  15. [15]

    Albarelli, J

    F. Albarelli, J. F. Friel, and A. Datta, Evaluating the holevo cram´ er-rao bound for multiparameter quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 200503 (2019)

    2019

  16. [16]

    Z. Hou, Z. Zhang, G.-Y. Xiang, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, H. Chen, L. Liu, and H. Yuan, Minimal tradeoff and ul- timate precision limit of multiparameter quantum mag- netometry under the parallel scheme, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 020501 (2020)

    2020

  17. [18]

    Pezz` e, M

    L. Pezz` e, M. A. Ciampini, N. Spagnolo, P. C. Humphreys, A. Datta, I. A. Walmsley, M. Barbieri, F. Sciarrino, and A. Smerzi, Optimal measurements for simultaneous quantum estimation of multiple phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 130504 (2017)

    2017

  18. [19]

    Y. Yang, V. Montenegro, and A. Bayat, Overcoming quantum metrology singularity through sequential mea- surements, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 010401 (2025)

    2025

  19. [20]

    Komar, E

    P. Komar, E. M. Kessler, M. Bishof, L. Jiang, A. S. Sørensen, J. Ye, and M. D. Lukin, A quantum network of clocks, Nat. Phys.10, 582 (2014)

    2014

  20. [21]

    T. J. Proctor, P. A. Knott, and J. A. Dunningham, Mul- tiparameter estimation in networked quantum sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 080501 (2018)

    2018

  21. [22]

    Gessner, A

    M. Gessner, A. Smerzi, and L. Pezz` e, Multiparameter squeezing for optimal quantum enhancements in sensor networks, Nat. Commun.11, 3817 (2020)

    2020

  22. [23]

    Y. Li, L. Joosten, Y. Baamara, P. Colciaghi, A. Sinatra, P. Treutlein, and T. Zibold, Multiparameter estimation with an array of entangled atomic sensors, Science391, 374 (2026)

    2026

  23. [24]

    Zhang, L

    J. Zhang, L. Wang, Y.-J. Hai, J. Zhang, J. Chu, J. Jiang, W. Huang, Y. Liang, J. Qiu, X. Sun,et al., Distributed multi-parameter quantum metrology with a superconducting quantum network, Nat. Commun.17, 1825 (2026)

    2026

  24. [25]

    Pezz` e and A

    L. Pezz` e and A. Smerzi, Distributed quantum multi- parameter estimation with optimal local measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 260805 (2025)

    2025

  25. [26]

    Mamaev, M

    M. Mamaev, M. Koppenh¨ ofer, A. Pocklington, and A. A. Clerk, Non-gaussian generalized two-mode squeezing: Applications to two-ensemble spin squeezing and beyond, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 073603 (2025)

    2025

  26. [27]

    Collins, N

    D. Collins, N. Gisin, N. Linden, S. Massar, and S. Popescu, Bell inequalities for arbitrarily high- dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 040404 (2002)

    2002

  27. [28]

    Luo, H.-S

    Y.-H. Luo, H.-S. Zhong, M. Erhard, X.-L. Wang, L.-C. Peng, M. Krenn, X. Jiang, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, C.-Y. Lu, A. Zeilinger, and J.-W. Pan, Quantum teleportation in high dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 070505 (2019)

    2019

  28. [29]

    Y. Wang, Z. Hu, B. C. Sanders, and S. Kais, Qudits and high-dimensional quantum computing, Front. Phys. 8, 589504 (2020)

    2020

  29. [30]

    D. J. Wineland, J. J. Bollinger, W. M. Itano, F. L. Moore, and D. J. Heinzen, Spin squeezing and reduced quantum noise in spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. A46, R6797 (1992)

    1992

  30. [31]

    D. J. Wineland, J. J. Bollinger, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Heinzen, Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. A50, 67 (1994)

    1994

  31. [32]

    Kitagawa and M

    M. Kitagawa and M. Ueda, Squeezed spin states, Phys. Rev. A47, 5138 (1993)

    1993

  32. [33]

    J. Ma, X. Wang, C. Sun, and F. Nori, Quantum spin squeezing, Phys. Rep.509, 89 (2011)

    2011

  33. [34]

    J. T. Young, E. Chaparro, A. Pi˜ neiro Orioli, J. K. Thompson, and A. M. Rey, Engineering one axis twist- ing via a dissipative berry phase using strong symmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 040801 (2025)

    2025

  34. [35]

    W. Wu, E. J. Davis, L. B. Hughes, B. Ye, Z. Wang, D. Kufel, T. Ono, S. A. Meynell, M. Block, C. Liu,et al., Spin squeezing in an ensemble of nitrogen–vacancy cen- tres in diamond, Nature646, 74 (2025)

    2025

  35. [36]

    Szczykulska, T

    M. Szczykulska, T. Baumgratz, and A. Datta, Multi- parameter quantum metrology, Adv. Phys.: X1, 621 (2016)

    2016

  36. [37]

    J. Liu, H. Yuan, X.-M. Lu, and X. Wang, Quantum fisher information matrix and multiparameter estimation, J. Phys. A: Math. and Theor.53, 023001 (2020)

    2020

  37. [38]

    Gessner, L

    M. Gessner, L. Pezz` e, and A. Smerzi, Sensitivity bounds for multiparameter quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 130503 (2018)

    2018

  38. [39]

    J. S. Sidhu, Y. Ouyang, E. T. Campbell, and P. Kok, Tight bounds on the simultaneous estimation of incom- patible parameters, Phys. Rev. X11, 011028 (2021)

    2021

  39. [40]

    Matsumoto, A new approach to the cram´ er-rao-type bound of the pure-state model, J

    K. Matsumoto, A new approach to the cram´ er-rao-type bound of the pure-state model, J. Phys. A: Math. and Gen.35, 3111 (2002)

    2002

  40. [41]

    S. Ragy, M. Jarzyna, and R. Demkowicz-Dobrza´ nski, Compatibility in multiparameter quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. A94, 052108 (2016)

    2016

  41. [42]

    M. D. Vidrighin, G. Donati, M. G. Genoni, X.-M. Jin, W. S. Kolthammer, M. Kim, A. Datta, M. Barbieri, and I. A. Walmsley, Joint estimation of phase and phase dif- fusion for quantum metrology, Nat. Commun.5, 3532 (2014)

    2014

  42. [43]

    S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3439 (1994)

    1994

  43. [44]

    Yuan, A brief introduction to povm measurement in quantum communications (2022), arXiv:2201.07968 [quant-ph]

    R. Yuan, A brief introduction to povm measurement in quantum communications (2022), arXiv:2201.07968 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  44. [45]

    J. M. Renes, R. Blume-Kohout, A. J. Scott, and C. M. Caves, Symmetric informationally complete quantum measurements, J. Math. Phys.45, 2171 (2004)

    2004

  45. [46]

    I. J. Geng, K. Golubeva, and G. Gour, What are the minimal conditions required to define a symmetric in- formationally complete generalized measurement?, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 100401 (2021)

    2021

  46. [47]

    J. R. Taylor,An introduction to error analysis: the study of uncertainties in physical measurements(MIT Press, 2022)

    2022

  47. [48]

    Optimization of the single-site quan- tum Fisher information matrix of a qudit

    Please read the supplementary material for further de- tails, including: (I) Definition of the generalized Gell- Mann matrices (II). Optimization of the single-site quan- tum Fisher information matrix of a qudit. (III). Con- servation of the weak commutativity of the interacting Hamiltonian. (IV). Single-POVM construction for simul- taneous estimation ofL...

  48. [49]

    Polkovnikov, Phase space representation of quantum dynamics, Annals of Physics325, 1790 (2010)

    A. Polkovnikov, Phase space representation of quantum dynamics, Annals of Physics325, 1790 (2010)

    2010

  49. [50]

    Hosseinabadi, O

    H. Hosseinabadi, O. Chelpanova, and J. Marino, User- 7 friendly truncated wigner approximation for dissipative spin dynamics, PRX Quantum6, 030344 (2025)

    2025

  50. [51]

    Vitagliano, P

    G. Vitagliano, P. Hyllus, I. n. L. Egusquiza, and G. T´ oth, Spin squeezing inequalities for arbitrary spin, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 240502 (2011)

    2011

  51. [52]

    Vitagliano, I

    G. Vitagliano, I. Apellaniz, I. n. L. Egusquiza, and G. T´ oth, Spin squeezing and entanglement for an arbi- trary spin, Phys. Rev. A89, 032307 (2014)

    2014

  52. [53]

    W. Wu, E. J. Davis, L. B. Hughes, B. Ye, Z. Wang, D. Kufel, T. Ono, S. A. Meynell, M. Block, C. Liu, H. Yang, A. C. Bleszynski Jayich, and N. Y. Yao, Spin squeezing in an ensemble of nitrogen–vacancy centres in diamond, Nature646, 74 (2025)

    2025

  53. [54]

    J. F. Barry, J. M. Schloss, E. Bauch, M. J. Turner, C. A. Hart, L. M. Pham, and R. L. Walsworth, Sensitivity optimization for nv-diamond magnetometry, Rev. Mod. Phys.92, 015004 (2020)

    2020

  54. [55]

    M¨ ogerle, K

    J. M¨ ogerle, K. Brechtelsbauer, A. Gea-Caballero, J. Prior, G. Emperauger, G. Bornet, C. Chen, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, and H. B¨ uchler, Spin-1 haldane phase in a chain of rydberg atoms, PRX Quantum6, 020332 (2025)

    2025

  55. [56]

    R. M. W. van Bijnen and T. Pohl, Quantum magnetism and topological ordering via rydberg dressing near f¨ orster resonances, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 243002 (2015)

    2015

  56. [57]

    M. Qiao, G. Emperauger, C. Chen, L. Homeier, S. Hol- lerith, G. Bornet, R. Martin, B. G´ ely, L. Klein, D. Barredo, S. Geier, N.-C. Chiu, F. Grusdt, A. Bohrdt, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Realization of a doped quantum antiferromagnet in a Rydberg tweezer array, Nature644, 889 (2025)

    2025

  57. [58]

    Champion, Z

    E. Champion, Z. Wang, R. W. Parker, and M. S. Blok, Efficient control of a transmon qudit using effective spin- 7/2 rotations, Phys. Rev. X15, 021096 (2025)

    2025

  58. [59]

    Neeley, M

    M. Neeley, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, M. Hofheinz, E. Lucero, A. D. O’Connell, D. Sank, H. Wang, J. Wen- ner, A. N. Cleland,et al., Emulation of a quantum spin with a superconducting phase qudit, Science325, 722 (2009)

    2009

  59. [60]

    Schachenmayer, A

    J. Schachenmayer, A. Pikovski, and A. M. Rey, Many- body quantum spin dynamics with monte carlo trajecto- ries on a discrete phase space, Phys. Rev. X5, 011022 (2015)

    2015

  60. [61]

    B. Zhu, A. M. Rey, and J. Schachenmayer, A generalized phase space approach for solving quantum spin dynamics, New J. Phys.21, 082001 (2019)

    2019

  61. [62]

    M. A. Perlin, C. Qu, and A. M. Rey, Spin squeezing with short-range spin-exchange interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 223401 (2020)

    2020

  62. [63]

    Entanglement and spin-squeezing without infinite-range interactions

    M. Foss-Feig, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, and C. W. Clark, Entanglement and spin-squeezing with- out infinite-range interactions (2016), arXiv:1612.07805 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  63. [64]

    Block, B

    M. Block, B. Ye, B. Roberts, S. Chern, W. Wu, Z. Wang, L. Pollet, E. J. Davis, B. I. Halperin, and N. Y. Yao, Scal- able spin squeezing from finite-temperature easy-plane magnetism, Nat. Phys.20, 1575 (2024)

    2024

  64. [65]

    Kaplan-Lipkin, P

    A. Kaplan-Lipkin, P. J. D. Crowley, J. N. Hall´ en, Z. Wang, W. Wu, S. Chern, C. R. Laumann, L. Pollet, and N. Y. Yao, Theory of scalable spin squeezing with disordered quantum dipoles (2025), arXiv:2512.19781 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [66]

    Single-Ensemble Multiparameter Squeezing with Qudits

    S. E. Begg, B. K. Ghosh, C. Zu, C. Zhang, and M. Kolo- drubetz, Scalable spin squeezing in power-law interact- ing xxz models with disorder (2026), arXiv:2601.10703 [quant-ph]. Supplementary Information of “Single-Ensemble Multiparameter Squeezing with Qudits” Xiaoshui Lin, 1 Chunlei Qu, 2, 3 Chong Zu, 1, 4 and Chuanwei Zhang 1, 4,∗ 1Department of Physics...

    work page arXiv 2026