pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.26706 · v1 · pith:IP5E3FCGnew · submitted 2026-05-26 · ✦ hep-th

Nonlinear Breit-Wheeler Process Driven by Intense Squeezed Light

Xin Ge , Kai-Hong Zhuang , Pei-Lun He , Yue-Yue Chen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 16:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords nonlinear Breit-Wheelersqueezed coherent statesstrong-field QEDpair productionMonte Carlo simulationHusimi Q-functionpositron polarization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Statistical fluctuations in squeezed coherent light reshape nonlinear Breit-Wheeler pair production observables even at fixed mean field amplitude.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the nonlinear Breit-Wheeler process when the driving field is a squeezed coherent state rather than a classical laser background. It demonstrates that the inherent amplitude fluctuations of the squeezed state modify the produced pairs' energy spectra, angular distributions, and spin polarization through changes in multiphoton absorption channels. A Monte Carlo method averages over field realizations sampled from the state's Husimi Q-function while keeping the mean electric-field strength constant. These modifications include smoothed harmonics, boosted higher-order channels, reduced single-photon absorption, higher positron polarization with increased squeezing, and wider angular spreads. The work establishes a direct connection between the quantum statistics of the light source and the resulting strong-field QED signals.

Core claim

Using a polarization-resolved Monte Carlo framework with stochastic averaging over the field-amplitude distribution derived from the Husimi Q-function, the authors simulate collisions of gamma photons with squeezed light and identify clear source-state-dependent modifications of the pair production signal. These effects include the smoothing of harmonic structure, the enhancement of higher-order multiphoton channels, and the suppression of the single-laser-photon absorption channel when stronger-field realizations raise the dressed-mass threshold. Within the selected spectral window, the degree of positron polarization increases monotonically with the squeezing parameter, while the angular d

What carries the argument

Polarization-resolved Monte Carlo simulation with stochastic averaging over field-amplitude realizations drawn from the Husimi Q-function of the squeezed coherent state.

If this is right

  • Harmonic structure in the pair-production spectrum smooths due to the spread in field amplitudes.
  • Higher-order multiphoton absorption channels gain relative weight compared with the mean-field case.
  • The single-photon absorption channel is suppressed once stronger field realizations push the effective mass threshold higher.
  • Positron polarization rises steadily with the squeezing parameter inside the chosen spectral window.
  • Angular distributions of the pairs widen as the probability of larger instantaneous field amplitudes grows.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same stochastic-averaging approach could be applied to other strong-field QED processes such as nonlinear Compton scattering to check for analogous state-dependent signatures.
  • Laser sources with controllable squeezing might offer an experimental handle on pair-production rates and polarizations beyond intensity alone.
  • Quantum fluctuations in the driving field act as an extra control parameter that could be tuned in high-intensity laser facilities.
  • Mixed or non-Gaussian quantum states of light could produce still different observable patterns if their amplitude distributions differ from squeezed coherent states.

Load-bearing premise

Averaging over the field-amplitude distribution from the Husimi Q-function correctly captures the quantum statistics that matter for the nonlinear Breit-Wheeler process.

What would settle it

Compare measured positron energy spectra or polarization fractions from gamma-photon collisions with squeezed versus coherent light at identical mean intensity and look for differences in harmonic smoothing or monotonic polarization growth with squeezing parameter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26706 by Kai-Hong Zhuang, Pei-Lun He, Xin Ge, Yue-Yue Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of nonlinear Breit–Wheeler pair produc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Positron energy spectra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A. Positron spectrum The resulting positron energy spectra for different squeezing parameters are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Relative weight of the single-photon channel ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Energy‑resolved longitudinal spin polarization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Angular distributions of positrons, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Energy spectrum of positrons generated in the NBW [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The nonlinear Breit-Wheeler process is a fundamental phenomenon of strong-field quantum electrodynamics and is usually studied for classically prescribed laser backgrounds. Here we examine how the statistical properties of a squeezed coherent driving field modify nonlinear Breit-Wheeler pair production. Using a polarization-resolved Monte Carlo framework with stochastic averaging over the field-amplitude distribution derived from the Husimi Q-function, we simulate collisions of gamma photons with squeezed light and identify clear source-state-dependent modifications of the pair production signal. These effects include the smoothing of harmonic structure, the enhancement of higher-order multiphoton channels, and the suppression of the single-laser-photon absorption channel when stronger-field realizations raise the dressed-mass threshold. Within the selected spectral window, the degree of positron polarization increases monotonically with the squeezing parameter, while the angular distributions broaden as the statistical weight of larger field amplitudes increases. Our results show that, even at fixed mean electric-field amplitude, the statistical fluctuations inherent to the squeezed coherent state can substantially reshape spectral, angular, and spin-resolved observables in strong-field pair production. These findings illustrate a direct link between source-state-dependent field statistics and strong-field pair production observables, and provide a theoretical framework for studying how squeezed-state preparation of the driving field can influence high-energy QED processes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper develops a polarization-resolved Monte Carlo framework that performs stochastic averaging of nonlinear Breit-Wheeler pair-production probabilities over field-amplitude realizations sampled from the Husimi Q-function of a squeezed coherent state. It reports that, even at fixed mean electric-field strength, the fluctuations inherent to the squeezed state smooth harmonic structure, enhance higher-order multiphoton channels, suppress the single-photon absorption channel, increase positron polarization monotonically with the squeezing parameter, and broaden angular distributions.

Significance. If the semiclassical stochastic averaging is shown to be a faithful representation of the quantized-field statistics, the work establishes a direct connection between the quantum state of the driving field and strong-field QED observables. This could open a route to using squeezed-light sources to control spectral and spin features in pair production, a result that would be of interest to both the strong-field QED and quantum-optics communities.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The central numerical claims rest on the stochastic averaging procedure, yet the manuscript supplies no validation data, error bars, or convergence tests for the Monte Carlo sampling (abstract). Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the reported smoothing of harmonics and polarization trends are robust or artifacts of insufficient sampling.
  2. [Abstract] The method assumes that the interaction Hamiltonian can be evaluated with c-number fields drawn from the Husimi Q-function without operator-ordering corrections or vacuum contributions. In the nonlinear regime the rate depends on high powers of the field; a concrete test (e.g., recovery of the known coherent-state limit or comparison with a truncated Fock-space calculation) is required to establish that the averaging correctly encodes the quantum statistics.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the squeezing parameter and the precise definition of the field-amplitude distribution should be stated explicitly in the main text rather than left to the abstract.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which highlight the need for stronger validation of our numerical approach. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested checks and clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The central numerical claims rest on the stochastic averaging procedure, yet the manuscript supplies no validation data, error bars, or convergence tests for the Monte Carlo sampling (abstract). Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the reported smoothing of harmonics and polarization trends are robust or artifacts of insufficient sampling.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation of the Monte Carlo procedure is necessary. The current manuscript presents the framework and main physical results but omits convergence diagnostics. In the revised version we will add (i) a dedicated subsection reporting the number of samples employed, (ii) statistical error bars on all plotted observables, and (iii) explicit convergence tests obtained by successively increasing the sample size until the reported smoothing of harmonics and polarization trends stabilize within the quoted precision. These additions will allow readers to judge the robustness of the findings. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The method assumes that the interaction Hamiltonian can be evaluated with c-number fields drawn from the Husimi Q-function without operator-ordering corrections or vacuum contributions. In the nonlinear regime the rate depends on high powers of the field; a concrete test (e.g., recovery of the known coherent-state limit or comparison with a truncated Fock-space calculation) is required to establish that the averaging correctly encodes the quantum statistics.

    Authors: The Husimi Q-function is adopted because it supplies a positive-definite quasiprobability that permits straightforward Monte Carlo sampling of field amplitudes. This choice implicitly adopts antinormal ordering. We will strengthen the manuscript by adding a direct numerical test: when the squeezing parameter is set to zero the sampled distribution reduces to a coherent state and our computed pair-production rates recover the well-known results for a classical field of identical mean amplitude. A full truncated-Fock-space benchmark is computationally prohibitive for the nonlinear regime considered here; we will therefore note this limitation explicitly while emphasizing that the coherent-state recovery constitutes the minimal required consistency check. A short discussion of the ordering approximation and its domain of applicability will also be included. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard numerical simulation of known quantum statistics

full rationale

The paper implements a Monte Carlo simulation of the nonlinear Breit-Wheeler process by sampling field amplitudes from the standard Husimi Q-function of a squeezed coherent state and averaging the pair-production probability over those realizations. This is a direct application of established quantum-optics tools to strong-field QED; no derivation step defines an output quantity in terms of itself, renames a fitted parameter as a prediction, or relies on a self-citation chain for a uniqueness theorem. The central claim (source-state-dependent reshaping of observables) follows from the numerical procedure without reducing to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on standard strong-field QED and quantum-optics assumptions; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Husimi Q-function provides the correct probability distribution for stochastic averaging of the laser field amplitude.
    Invoked in the abstract for the Monte Carlo sampling procedure.
  • standard math Standard nonlinear Breit-Wheeler kinematics and polarization rules remain valid under stochastic field averaging.
    Implicit in the use of the established process inside the Monte Carlo framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5756 in / 1271 out tokens · 35955 ms · 2026-06-29T16:19:43.275886+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Titov, H

    A. Titov, H. Takabe, and B. Kämpfer, Nonlinear breit- wheeler process in short laser double pulses, Phys. Rev. D 98, 036022 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    M. J. Jansen and C. Müller, Strong-field breit–wheeler pair production in two consecutive laser pulses with vari- able time delay, Physics Letters B 766, 71 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    Burke, R

    D. Burke, R. Field, G. Horton-Smith, J. Spencer, D. Walz, S. Berridge, W. Bugg, K. Shmakov, A. Weide- mann, C. Bula, et al., Positron production in multipho- ton light-by-light scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1626 (1997)

    1997

  4. [4]

    Bamber, S

    C. Bamber, S. Boege, T. Koffas, T. Kotseroglou, A. Melissinos, D. Meyerhofer, D. Reis, W. Ragg, C. Bula, K. McDonald, et al., Studies of nonlinear qed in collisions of 46.6 gev electrons with intense laser pulses, Phys. Rev. D 60, 092004 (1999). 9

    1999

  5. [5]

    Tang and B

    S. Tang and B. King, Pulse envelope effects in nonlinear breit-wheeler pair creation, Phys. Rev. D 104, 096019 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    Bulanov, C

    S. Bulanov, C. Schroeder, E. Esarey, and W. Lee- mans, Electromagnetic cascade in high-energy electron, positron, and photon interactions with intense laser pulses, Phys. Rev. A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 87, 062110 (2013)

    2013

  7. [7]

    Meuren, C

    S. Meuren, C. H. Keitel, and A. Di Piazza, Semiclassical picture for electron-positron photoproduction in strong laser fields, Phys. Rev. D 93, 085028 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    Barbosa, M

    B. Barbosa, M. Vranic, K. Weichman, D. Ramsey, and J. Palastro, Phase control of nonlinear breit-wheeler pair creation, Physical Review Research 6, 023152 (2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    Jiang, Y.-N

    J.-J. Jiang, Y.-N. Dai, K.-H. Zhuang, Y. Gao, S. Tang, and Y.-Y. Chen, Interferences effects in the polar- ized nonlinear breit-wheeler process, Phys. Rev. D 109, 036030 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    Tang, Fully polarized nonlinear breit-wheeler pair pro- duction in pulsed plane waves, Phys

    S. Tang, Fully polarized nonlinear breit-wheeler pair pro- duction in pulsed plane waves, Phys. Rev. D 105, 056018 (2022)

    2022

  11. [11]

    Blackburn and B

    T. Blackburn and B. King, Higher fidelity simulations of nonlinear breit–wheeler pair creation in intense laser pulses, The European Physical Journal C 82, 44 (2022)

    2022

  12. [12]

    Blackburn and M

    T. Blackburn and M. Marklund, Nonlinear breit–wheeler pair creation with bremsstrahlung γ rays, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 60, 054009 (2018)

    2018

  13. [13]

    F. Wan, Y. Wang, R.-T. Guo, Y.-Y. Chen, R. Shaisul- tanov, Z.-F. Xu, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, C. H. Keitel, and J.-X. Li, High-energy γ-photon polarization in nonlinear breit-wheeler pair production and γ polarimetry, Physi- cal Review Research 2, 032049 (2020)

    2020

  14. [14]

    Borysov, B

    O. Borysov, B. Heinemann, A. Ilderton, B. King, and A. Potylitsyn, Using the nonlinear breit-wheeler process to test nonlinear vacuum birefringence, Phys. Rev. D 106, 116015 (2022)

    2022

  15. [15]

    Y. Wang, W. Zhang, R. Li, L. Tian, and Y. Zheng, Gen- eration of- 10.7 db unbiased entangled states of light, Ap- plied Physics Letters 118 (2021)

    2021

  16. [16]

    Slusher, L

    R. Slusher, L. Hollberg, B. Yurke, J. Mertz, and J. Valley, Observation of squeezed states generated by four-wave mixing in an optical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2409 (1985)

    1985

  17. [17]

    L.-A. Wu, H. Kimble, J. Hall, and H. Wu, Generation of squeezed states by parametric down conversion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2520 (1986)

    1986

  18. [18]

    Schneider, M

    K. Schneider, M. Lang, J. Mlynek, and S. Schiller, Gener- ation of strongly squeezed continuous-wave light at 1064 nm, Optics express 2, 59 (1998)

    1998

  19. [19]

    Furusawa, J

    A. Furusawa, J. L. Sørensen, S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and E. S. Polzik, Unconditional quantum teleportation, science 282, 706 (1998)

    1998

  20. [20]

    P. Lam, T. Ralph, B. Buchler, D. McClelland, H. Ba- chor, and J. Gao, Optimization and transfer of vacuum squeezing from an optical parametric oscillator, Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics 1, 469 (1999)

    1999

  21. [21]

    T. Aoki, G. Takahashi, and A. Furusawa, Squeezing at 946nm with periodically poled ktiopo4, Optics express 14, 6930 (2006)

    2006

  22. [22]

    Mehmet, S

    M. Mehmet, S. Ast, T. Eberle, S. Steinlechner, H. Vahlbruch, and R. Schnabel, Squeezed light at 1550 nm with a quantum noise reduction of 12.3 db, Optics express 19, 25763 (2011)

    2011

  23. [23]

    Kumar and J

    P. Kumar and J. H. Shapiro, Squeezed-state generation via forward degenerate four-wave mixing, Phys. Rev. A 30, 1568 (1984)

    1984

  24. [24]

    Yurke, Squeezed-coherent-state generation via four- wave mixers and detection via homodyne detectors, Phys

    B. Yurke, Squeezed-coherent-state generation via four- wave mixers and detection via homodyne detectors, Phys. Rev. A 32, 300 (1985)

    1985

  25. [25]

    A. S. Moskalenko, C. Riek, D. V. Seletskiy, G. Burkard, and A. Leitenstorfer, Paraxial theory of direct electro- optic sampling of the quantum vacuum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 263601 (2015)

    2015

  26. [26]

    Benea-Chelmus, F

    I.-C. Benea-Chelmus, F. F. Settembrini, G. Scalari, and J. Faist, Electric field correlation measurements on the electromagnetic vacuum state, Nature 568, 202 (2019)

    2019

  27. [27]

    Shields, A

    T. Shields, A. C. Dada, L. Hirsch, S. Yoon, J. M. R. Weaver, D. Faccio, L. Caspani, M. Peccianti, and M. Clerici, Electro-optical sampling of single-cycle thz fields with single-photon detectors, Sensors 22, 9432 (2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    Fang, F.-X

    Y. Fang, F.-X. Sun, Q. He, and Y. Liu, Strong-field ion- ization of hydrogen atoms with quantum light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 253201 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    Even Tzur and O

    M. Even Tzur and O. Cohen, Motion of charged parti- cles in bright squeezed vacuum, Light: Science & Appli- cations 13, 41 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Heimerl, A

    J. Heimerl, A. Mikhaylov, S. Meier, H. Höllerer, I. Kaminer, M. Chekhova, and P. Hommelhoff, Multipho- ton electron emission with non-classical light, Nat. Phys. 20, 945 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Wang and X

    S. Wang and X. Lai, High-order above-threshold ioniza- tion of an atom in intense quantum light, Phys. Rev. A 108, 063101 (2023)

    2023

  32. [32]

    Z. Lyu, F. Sun, Y. Fang, Q. He, and Y. Liu, Effect of pho- ton quantum statistics on electrons in above-threshold ionization, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, L012072 (2025)

    2025

  33. [33]

    Mao, E.-R

    Y.-J. Mao, E.-R. Zhou, Y. Li, P.-L. He, and F. He, Bench- marking atomic ionization driven by strong quantum light, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.15458 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    H. Liu, H. Zhang, X. Wang, and J. Yuan, Atomic dou- ble ionization with quantum light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 123202 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    X. Long, P. Li, and Y. Liu, Hydrogen molecular disso- ciation driven by quantum light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 153201 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    Bærentsen, S

    C. Bærentsen, S. A. Fedorov, C. Østfeldt, M. V. Bal- abas, E. Zeuthen, and E. S. Polzik, Squeezed light from an oscillator measured at the rate of oscillation, Nature Communications 15, 4146 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Lemieux, S

    S. Lemieux, S. Jalil, D. Purschke, N. Boroumand, D. Vil- leneuve, A. Naumov, T. Brabec, and G. Vampa, Photon bunching in high-harmonic emission controlled by quan- tum light (2024), arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.05474

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    S. Wang, X. Lai, and X. Liu, Attosecond pulse synthesis from high-order harmonic generation in intense squeezed light, Phys. Rev. A 112, L011102 (2025)

    2025

  39. [39]

    de-la Pena, O

    S. de-la Pena, O. Neufeld, M. Even Tzur, O. Cohen, H. Appel, and A. Rubio, Quantum electrodynamics in high-harmonic generation: Multitrajectory ehrenfest and exact quantum analysis, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 21, 283 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Rivera-Dean, H

    J. Rivera-Dean, H. Crispin, P. Stammer, T. Lamprou, E. Pisanty, M. Krüger, P. Tzallas, M. Lewenstein, and M. Ciappina, Squeezed states of light after high-order harmonic generation in excited atomic systems, Phys. Rev. A 110, 063118 (2024). 10

    2024

  41. [41]

    Rasputnyi, Z

    A. Rasputnyi, Z. Chen, M. Birk, O. Cohen, I. Kaminer, M. Krüger, D. Seletskiy, M. Chekhova, and F. Tani, High- harmonic generation by a bright squeezed vacuum, Nat. Phys. 20, 1960 (2024)

    1960

  42. [42]

    Rivera-Dean, P

    J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, M. Ciappina, and M. Lewenstein, Structured squeezed light allows for high- harmonic generation in classical forbidden geometries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 013801 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    Khalaf and I

    M. Khalaf and I. Kaminer, Compton scattering driven by intense quantum light, Science Advances 9, eade0932 (2023)

    2023

  44. [44]

    Di Piazza and K

    A. Di Piazza and K. Qu, Control of nonlinear compton scattering in a squeezed vacuum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 085001 (2026)

    2026

  45. [45]

    Ivanov, G

    D. Ivanov, G. Kotkin, and V. Serbo, Complete descrip- tion of polarization effects in e+e− pair production by a photon in the field of a strong laser wave, Eur. Phys. J. C 40, 27 (2005)

    2005

  46. [46]

    Wünsche, Quantization of gauss–hermite and gauss– laguerre beams in free space, J

    A. Wünsche, Quantization of gauss–hermite and gauss– laguerre beams in free space, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semi- class. Opt. 6, S47 (2004)

    2004

  47. [47]

    YOKOYA, High Energy Physics: Ichep 2004- Proceedings Of The 32nd International Conference (In 2 Volumes), World Scientific (2005)

    K. YOKOYA, High Energy Physics: Ichep 2004- Proceedings Of The 32nd International Conference (In 2 Volumes), World Scientific (2005)

    2004

  48. [48]

    Attosecond Access to the Quantum Noise of Light

    E.-R. Zhou, Y.-J. Mao, P.-L. He, and F. He, Attosec- ond access to the quantum noise of light, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.13485 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  49. [49]

    Y. Kern, I. Nisim, M. Birk, A. Rasputnyi, D. Behar, Z. Chen, I. Kaminer, P. Sidorenko, O. Cohen, and M. Krüger, Single-shot pulse retrieval of femtosecond bright squeezed vacuum, Optica 13, 395 (2026)

    2026

  50. [50]

    Ritus, Quantum effects of the interaction of elemen- tary particles with an intense electromagnetic field, J

    V. Ritus, Quantum effects of the interaction of elemen- tary particles with an intense electromagnetic field, J. Sov. Laser Res.;(United States) 6 (1985)

    1985

  51. [51]

    C. C. Gerry and P. L. Knight, Introductory Quantum Optics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2023)

    2023

  52. [52]

    K. Y. Spasibko, D. A. Kopylov, V. L. Krutyanskiy, T. V. Murzina, G. Leuchs, and M. V. Chekhova, Multiphoton effects enhanced due to ultrafast photon-number fluctua- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 223603 (2017)

    2017