pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.27357 · v1 · pith:2LO4QOLPnew · submitted 2026-05-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-ph· hep-th

Gaussian Process Reconstruction of Cosmological Parameters with Gravitational Wave Sirens using Machine Learning

Gourab Nandi , Anish Ghoshal , David F. Mota This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 15:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords gravitational wave standard sirensGaussian process regressioncosmological model discriminationexpansion history reconstructionLISAEinstein Telescopedark energy models
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gaussian process regression on gravitational wave standard sirens recovers expansion histories but requires derivative diagnostics to separate models at specific redshifts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies Gaussian Process Regression to mock catalogues from LISA and the Einstein Telescope to reconstruct the comoving distance and its derivatives in a model-independent way. This is tested on six fiducial backgrounds including Lambda CDM, CPL, interacting dark matter and energy models, and axion-inspired early dark energy. Reconstructions match the input histories when the full covariance including derivative terms is propagated to quantities such as H(z), q(z), Om(z), w_total(z) and kappa(z). Pointwise statistical comparisons show that distance data alone cannot decisively separate the models. Derivative-sensitive diagnostics instead isolate narrow redshift intervals where separation power peaks.

Core claim

While GW bright standard sirens faithfully recover fiducial expansion histories, background measurements alone do not provide decisive statistical separation among models; derivative sensitive diagnostics pinpoint specific redshift windows (e.g., z approximately 1.6-1.8 for ET and z approximately 2.6-2.9 for LISA) where future catalogues will maximize their discriminatory power.

What carries the argument

Gaussian Process Regression with full covariance propagation, including derivative cross-covariances, applied to gravitational wave standard siren distance data to compute multiple expansion diagnostics.

If this is right

  • Reconstructions of H(z), q(z), Om(z), w_total(z) and kappa(z) become feasible from future GW data without assuming a parametric cosmological form.
  • Background distance measurements will not suffice for model separation, so analysis must emphasize derivative quantities.
  • Future catalogues will deliver maximum discriminatory power in narrow redshift windows rather than uniformly across all redshifts.
  • Nonparametric methods can locate the redshift ranges containing the most useful information for distinguishing viable cosmologies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Observation strategies for LISA and ET could be optimized by prioritizing events in the identified redshift windows to improve model discrimination efficiency.
  • The GPR approach might be applied to other distance indicators such as supernovae to identify complementary redshift ranges where data are most informative.
  • If the mock catalogues prove representative, this framework suggests that high-redshift GW events will be particularly valuable for certain derivative diagnostics.

Load-bearing premise

The mock LISA and ET catalogues accurately capture the statistical properties and selection effects of real future data, including the full covariance structure needed for derivative propagation.

What would settle it

Real LISA or ET observations that produce derivative diagnostics showing no enhanced model separation in the predicted redshift windows, or that reveal mock catalogues misrepresent actual selection effects or covariances.

read the original abstract

Future gravitational wave (GW) standard siren catalogues will probe the late-time expansion history of the Universe across redshift ranges largely inaccessible to traditional electromagnetic observations. To determine how effectively this background distance information can distinguish between viable cosmological models, we introduce a model-independent reconstruction framework utilizing Gaussian Process Regression (GPR). Analyzing mock LISA and Einstein Telescope (ET) catalogues across six fiducial cosmological backgrounds-$\Lambda$CDM, CPL, CPL+$\Lambda$, interacting dark matter, interacting dark energy and axion inspired early dark energy. We reconstruct the comoving distance and its derivatives. Crucially, we propagated the full GP covariance, including derivative cross-covariances, to robustly evaluate the Hubble parameter $H(z)$ and other diagnostics such as $q(z)$, $\mathcal{O}_{m}(z)$ $w_{\rm total}(z)$ and $\kappa(z)$. While our analysis demonstrates that GW bright standard sirens faithfully recover fiducial expansion histories, applying pointwise marginal Hellinger distance reveals that background measurements alone do not provide decisive statistical separation among models. Instead, derivative sensitive diagnostics pinpoint specific redshift windows (e.g., $z\simeq1.6-1.8$ for ET and $z\simeq2.6-2.9$ for LISA) where future catalogues will maximize their discriminatory power. As machine learning methodologies become increasingly integral to astrophysics and cosmology, this Bayesian GPR pipeline offers a principled, nonparametric approach to precisely identifying where the most valuable cosmological information lies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) framework to reconstruct the comoving distance and its derivatives from mock LISA and Einstein Telescope (ET) gravitational wave standard siren catalogues. It analyzes six fiducial models (λ CDM, CPL, CPL+λ, interacting dark matter, interacting dark energy, axion-inspired early dark energy), propagates the full GP covariance (including derivative cross terms) to obtain H(z) and diagnostics q(z), Om(z), w_tot(z), κ(z), and uses pointwise marginal Hellinger distance to assess model separation. The central claim is that background distance measurements alone yield no decisive separation, while derivative-sensitive diagnostics isolate specific redshift windows (z≈1.6-1.8 for ET; z≈2.6-2.9 for LISA) where future data maximize discriminatory power.

Significance. If the mock catalogues accurately capture selection effects, redshift errors, and the joint covariance structure, the nonparametric GPR pipeline offers a principled way to locate the most informative redshift ranges for model discrimination with future GW sirens. The explicit propagation of derivative covariances is a technical strength that supports the diagnostics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The central claim that derivative diagnostics isolate specific redshift windows for model separation rests entirely on the statistical fidelity of the simulated LISA and ET catalogues (selection functions, host-galaxy bias, luminosity-distance errors, and full GP covariance including cross terms between f and f'). No external validation of these mocks against detailed population-synthesis simulations or existing GW constraints is described, which directly affects the recovered H(z) and the Hellinger distances.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states that six fiducial models were analyzed with mock catalogues, but without reported checks on whether post-hoc choices in the GPR kernel, hyperparameter optimization, or redshift binning influence the identified windows (z≈1.6-1.8 and z≈2.6-2.9), it is unclear whether these intervals are robust or sensitive to analysis details.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the diagnostics (q(z), Om(z), w_total(z), κ(z)) should be defined explicitly on first use with their exact functional forms in terms of the reconstructed distance and derivatives.
  2. The abstract mentions 'machine learning methodologies' but the method is standard GPR; clarifying the specific kernel and mean function choices would aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and describe the revisions we will undertake.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The central claim that derivative diagnostics isolate specific redshift windows for model separation rests entirely on the statistical fidelity of the simulated LISA and ET catalogues (selection functions, host-galaxy bias, luminosity-distance errors, and full GP covariance including cross terms between f and f'). No external validation of these mocks against detailed population-synthesis simulations or existing GW constraints is described, which directly affects the recovered H(z) and the Hellinger distances.

    Authors: We agree that the accuracy of the mock catalogues is fundamental to our conclusions. The catalogues were generated using standard prescriptions for selection effects, host-galaxy bias, and luminosity-distance errors as commonly used in the GW cosmology literature. While we did not include a direct comparison to population-synthesis simulations or existing constraints in this work, we will revise the manuscript to provide a more detailed description of the mock generation procedure and to explicitly discuss the assumptions and potential limitations. This will allow readers to better evaluate the robustness of the reported redshift windows. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The abstract states that six fiducial models were analyzed with mock catalogues, but without reported checks on whether post-hoc choices in the GPR kernel, hyperparameter optimization, or redshift binning influence the identified windows (z≈1.6-1.8 and z≈2.6-2.9), it is unclear whether these intervals are robust or sensitive to analysis details.

    Authors: We appreciate this point regarding the sensitivity of our results to analysis choices. Although we selected the GPR kernel and optimized hyperparameters following standard procedures for such reconstructions, we did not report explicit robustness tests in the original submission. In the revised manuscript, we will include additional checks by varying the kernel hyperparameters within reasonable ranges and testing alternative binning schemes. We will demonstrate that the identified redshift windows remain consistent, thereby confirming the robustness of our findings. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: data-driven GP reconstruction from external mock catalogues

full rationale

The derivation reconstructs comoving distance and derivatives via GPR applied to mock LISA/ET catalogues generated from six fiducial models, then evaluates pointwise Hellinger distances on the recovered H(z), q(z), Om(z), w_tot(z) and kappa(z) using the full propagated GP covariance. These steps are driven by the input mock data and standard nonparametric regression; the claimed lack of decisive separation from background distances alone, versus windows identified by derivative diagnostics, follows from the computed distances on the reconstructed functions rather than reducing to any fitted parameter or self-defined quantity by construction. No self-citation load-bearing steps, fitted-input-as-prediction, or ansatz smuggling are present in the described chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review prevents enumeration of specific free parameters or axioms; typical GPR work would involve kernel hyperparameters and mock catalogue assumptions not visible here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5817 in / 1101 out tokens · 25293 ms · 2026-06-29T15:19:15.353170+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · 17 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Abbott et al.,Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys

    B.P. Abbott et al.,Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 061102

    2016

  2. [2]

    Abbott et al.,GW170817: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral,Phys

    B.P. Abbott et al.,GW170817: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 161101

    2017

  3. [3]

    Abbott et al.,Multi-messenger observations of a binary neutron star merger, Astrophys

    B.P. Abbott et al.,Multi-messenger observations of a binary neutron star merger, Astrophys. J. Lett.848(2017) L12

    2017

  4. [4]

    Schutz,Determining the Hubble constant from gravitational wave observations,Nature323 (1986) 310

    B.F. Schutz,Determining the Hubble constant from gravitational wave observations,Nature323 (1986) 310

    1986

  5. [5]

    Holz and S.A

    D.E. Holz and S.A. Hughes,Using gravitational-wave standard sirens,Astrophys. J.629(2005) 15

    2005

  6. [6]

    Abbott et al.,A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant, Nature551(2017) 85

    B.P. Abbott et al.,A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant, Nature551(2017) 85

    2017

  7. [7]

    H.-Y. Chen, M. Fishbach and D.E. Holz,A two per cent Hubble constant measurement from standard sirens within five years,Nature562(2018) 545

    2018

  8. [8]

    Borhanian, A

    S. Borhanian, A. Dhani, A. Gupta, K.G. Arun and B.S. Sathyaprakash,Dark sirens to resolve the Hubble–Lemaˆ ıtre tension,Astrophys. J. Lett.905(2020) L28

    2020

  9. [9]

    A standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant from GW170817 without the electromagnetic counterpart

    M. Fishbach et al.,A standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant from GW170817 without the electromagnetic counterpart,Astrophys. J. Lett.871(2019) L13 [1807.05667]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    M. Soares-Santos et al.,First measurement of the Hubble constant from a dark standard siren using the Dark Energy Survey galaxies and the LIGO/Virgo binary–black-hole merger GW170814, Astrophys. J. Lett.876(2019) L7 [1901.01540]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    Abbott et al.,A gravitational-wave measurement of the Hubble constant following the second observing run of advanced LIGO and Virgo,Astrophys

    B.P. Abbott et al.,A gravitational-wave measurement of the Hubble constant following the second observing run of advanced LIGO and Virgo,Astrophys. J.909(2021) 218 [1908.06060]. – 43 –

    work page arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Abbott et al.,Constraints on the cosmic expansion history from GWTC-3,Astrophys

    R. Abbott et al.,Constraints on the cosmic expansion history from GWTC-3,Astrophys. J.949 (2023) 76 [2111.03604]

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    W.M. Farr, M. Fishbach, J. Ye and D.E. Holz,A future percent-level measurement of the Hubble expansion at redshift 0.8 with advanced LIGO,Astrophys. J. Lett.883(2019) L42 [ 1908.09084]

    work page arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    Riess et al.,A comprehensive measurement of the local value of the Hubble constant with 1 km s−1mpc−1uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES team, Astrophys

    A.G. Riess et al.,A comprehensive measurement of the local value of the Hubble constant with 1 km s−1mpc−1uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES team, Astrophys. J. Lett.934(2022) L7

    2022

  15. [15]

    Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6

    2018

  16. [16]

    Heymans et al.,KiDS-1000 cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints,Astron

    C. Heymans et al.,KiDS-1000 cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints,Astron. Astrophys.646(2021) A140

    2021

  17. [17]

    Abbott et al.,Dark energy survey year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing,Phys

    T.M.C. Abbott et al.,Dark energy survey year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 023520

    2022

  18. [18]

    DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

    DESI Collaboration, A.G. Adame et al.,DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations,arXiv e-prints(2024) [2404.03002]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Di Valentino, O

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan et al.,In the realm of the Hubble tension — a review of solutions,Class. Quantum Grav.38(2021) 153001

    2021

  20. [20]

    Maggiore et al.,Science case for the Einstein Telescope,J

    M. Maggiore et al.,Science case for the Einstein Telescope,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2020 (2020) 050

    2020

  21. [21]

    Sathyaprakash, B.F

    B.S. Sathyaprakash, B.F. Schutz and C. Van Den Broeck,Cosmography with the Einstein Telescope,Class. Quantum Grav.27(2010) 215006

    2010

  22. [22]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    P. Amaro-Seoane et al.,Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,arXiv e-prints(2017) [1702.00786]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  23. [23]

    Klein et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA: Supermassive black hole binaries,Phys

    A. Klein et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA: Supermassive black hole binaries,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 024003

    2016

  24. [24]

    Tamanini, C

    N. Tamanini, C. Caprini, E. Barausse et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA: Supermassive black hole binaries as standard sirens,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2016(2016) 002

    2016

  25. [25]

    Measuring a cosmological distance-redshift relationship using only gravitational wave observations of binary neutron star coalescences

    C. Messenger and J. Read,Measuring a cosmological distance–redshift relationship using only gravitational wave observations of binary neutron star coalescences,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 091101 [1107.5725]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  26. [26]

    Prospects for resolving the Hubble constant tension with standard sirens

    S.M. Feeney, H.V. Peiris, A.R. Williamson, S.M. Nissanke, D.J. Mortlock, J. Alsing et al., Prospects for resolving the Hubble constant tension with standard sirens,Phys. Rev. Lett.122 (2019) 061105 [1802.03404]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    Mukherjee, B.D

    S. Mukherjee, B.D. Wandelt, S.M. Nissanke and A. Silvestri,Accurate precision cosmology with redshift unknown gravitational wave sources,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 043520 [2007.02943]

    work page arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Cigarr´ an D´ ıaz and S

    C. Cigarr´ an D´ ıaz and S. Mukherjee,Mapping the cosmic expansion history from LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA in synergy with DESI and SPHEREx,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.511 (2022) 2782 [2107.12787]

    work page arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    Jin, S.-S

    S.-J. Jin, S.-S. Xing, Y. Shao, J.-F. Zhang and X. Zhang,Joint constraints on cosmological parameters using future multi-band gravitational wave standard siren observations,Chinese Phys. C47(2023) 065104 [2301.06722]

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Afroz, S

    S. Afroz, S. Mukherjee and G. Tasinato,Illuminating dark energy with bright standard sirens from future detectors,arXiv e-prints(2025) [2507.06340]. – 44 –

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Afroz and S

    S. Afroz and S. Mukherjee,Prospect of precision cosmology and testing general relativity using binary black holes–galaxies cross-correlation,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.534(2024) 1283 [2407.09262]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    R. Shah, A. Bhaumik, P. Mukherjee and S. Pal,A thorough investigation of the prospects of eLISA in addressing the Hubble tension: Fisher forecast, MCMC and machine learning, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2023(2023) 038 [2301.12708]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Mukherjee, R

    P. Mukherjee, R. Shah, A. Bhaumik and S. Pal,Reconstructing the Hubble parameter with future gravitational wave missions using machine learning,Astrophys. J.960(2024) 61 [2303.05169]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Seikel, C

    M. Seikel, C. Clarkson and M. Smith,Reconstruction of dark energy and expansion dynamics using Gaussian processes,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2012(2012) 036

    2012

  35. [35]

    Holsclaw, U

    T. Holsclaw, U. Alam, B. Sans´ o, H. Lee, K. Heitmann, S. Habib et al.,Nonparametric dark energy reconstruction from supernova data,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 241302

    2010

  36. [36]

    Busti, C

    V.C. Busti, C. Clarkson and M. Seikel,Evidence for a lower value forH 0 from cosmic chronometers data?,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.441(2014) L11

    2014

  37. [37]

    Yahya, M

    S. Yahya, M. Seikel, C. Clarkson, R. Maartens and M. Smith,Null tests of the cosmological constant using supernovae,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 023503

    2014

  38. [38]

    Shafieloo, A.G

    A. Shafieloo, A.G. Kim and E.V. Linder,Gaussian Process Cosmography,Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 123530

    2012

  39. [39]

    Holsclaw, U

    T. Holsclaw, U. Alam, B. Sanso et al.,Nonparametric reconstruction of the dark energy equation of state,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 083501

    2011

  40. [40]

    We do not live in the R_h = c t universe

    M. Bilicki and M. Seikel,We do not live in the rh =ct universe,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.425 (2012) 1664 [1206.5130]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  41. [41]

    $H_0$ from cosmic chronometers and Type Ia supernovae, with Gaussian Processes and the novel Weighted Polynomial Regression method

    A. G´ omez-Valent and L. Amendola,H0 from cosmic chronometers and type Ia supernovae, with Gaussian processes and the novel weighted polynomial regression method, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2018(2018) 051 [1802.01505]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    Hubble parameter reconstruction from a principal component analysis: minimizing the bias

    E.E.O. Ishida and R.S. de Souza,Hubble parameter reconstruction from a principal component analysis: minimizing the bias,Astron. Astrophys.527(2011) A49 [1012.5335]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  43. [43]

    Arjona and S

    R. Arjona and S. Nesseris,What can machine learning tell us about the background expansion of the universe?,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 123525 [1910.01529]

    work page arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Ghaleb, A

    A. Ghaleb, A. Malhotra, G. Tasinato and I. Zavala,Bayesian reconstruction of primordial perturbations from induced gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 123538 [2505.22534]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Mukherjee and A

    Ruchika, P. Mukherjee and A. Favale,Revisiting Gaussian process reconstruction for cosmological inference: The generalised GP (Gen GP) framework,arXiv e-prints(2025) [2510.03742]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Chevallier and D

    M. Chevallier and D. Polarski,Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D10(2001) 213

    2001

  47. [47]

    Linder,Exploring the expansion history of the universe,Phys

    E.V. Linder,Exploring the expansion history of the universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.90(2003) 091301

    2003

  48. [48]

    Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A5

    2018

  49. [49]

    Brout et al.,The Pantheon+ analysis: Cosmological constraints,Astrophys

    D. Brout et al.,The Pantheon+ analysis: Cosmological constraints,Astrophys. J.938(2022) 110

    2022

  50. [50]

    The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview

    J. Lesgourgues,The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) i: Overview,arXiv e-prints(2011) [1104.2932]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  51. [51]

    D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues and T. Tram,The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) ii: Approximation schemes,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2011(2011) 034

    2011

  52. [52]

    AxiCLASS: a version of CLASS for axion-like particles

    V. Poulin, T.L. Smith and T. Karwal, “AxiCLASS: a version of CLASS for axion-like particles. ” GitHub repository, accessed 26 May 2026: github.com/PoulinV/AxiCLASS, 2026. – 45 –

    2026

  53. [53]

    Smith, V

    T.L. Smith, V. Poulin and M.A. Amin,Oscillating scalar fields and the Hubble tension: A resolution with novel signatures,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 063523 [1908.06995]

    work page arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    Foreman-Mackey, D.W

    D. Foreman-Mackey, D.W. Hogg, D. Lang and J. Goodman,emcee: The MCMC hammer, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.125(2013) 306

    2013

  55. [55]

    Coupled Quintessence

    L. Amendola,Coupled quintessence,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 043511 [astro-ph/9908023]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  56. [56]

    B. Wang, E. Abdalla, F. Atrio-Barandela and D. Pav´ on,Dark matter and dark energy interactions: Theoretical challenges, cosmological implications and observational signatures, Rep. Prog. Phys.79(2016) 096901 [1603.08299]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  57. [57]

    S. Pan, W. Yang, E. Di Valentino, E.N. Saridakis and S. Chakraborty,Interacting scenarios with dynamical dark energy: Observational constraints and alleviation of theH 0 tension, Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 103520

    2019

  58. [58]

    Notari, M

    A. Notari, M. Redi and A. Tesi,Consistent theories for the DESI dark energy fit, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2024(2024) 025 [2406.08459]

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension

    V. Poulin, T.L. Smith, T. Karwal and M. Kamionkowski,Early dark energy can resolve the Hubble tension,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 221301 [1811.04083]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Bogdanovi´ c, M.C

    T. Bogdanovi´ c, M.C. Miller and L. Blecha,Electromagnetic counterparts to massive black-hole mergers,Living Rev. Relativ.25(2022) 3 [2109.03262]

    work page arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    Tamanini,Late time cosmology with LISA: probing the cosmic expansion with massive black hole binary mergers as standard sirens,J

    N. Tamanini,Late time cosmology with LISA: probing the cosmic expansion with massive black hole binary mergers as standard sirens,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.840(2017) 012029

    2017

  62. [62]

    Speri, N

    L. Speri, N. Tamanini, R.R. Caldwell, J.R. Gair and B. Wang,Testing the Hubble law with LISA standard sirens,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 083526

    2021

  63. [63]

    Marsat, J.G

    S. Marsat, J.G. Baker and T. Dal Canton,Exploring the Bayesian parameter estimation of binary black holes with LISA,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 083011

    2021

  64. [64]

    Ferreira, T

    J. Ferreira, T. Barreiro, J. Mimoso and N.J. Nunes,Forecastingf(q)cosmology withλcdm background using standard sirens,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 123531 [2203.13788]

    work page arXiv 2022

  65. [65]

    Hirata, D.E

    C.M. Hirata, D.E. Holz and C. Cutler,Reducing the weak lensing noise for the gravitational wave Hubble diagram using the non-Gaussian lens reconstruction,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 124046

    2010

  66. [66]

    Shapiro, D.J

    C. Shapiro, D.J. Bacon, M. Hendry and B. Hoyle,Delensing gravitational wave standard sirens with shear and flexion maps,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.404(2010) 858

    2010

  67. [67]

    Vaskonen,Weak lensing of bright standard sirens: prospects for σ8,Mon

    V. Vaskonen,Weak lensing of bright standard sirens: prospects for σ8,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 547(2026) stag353 [2601.06023]

    work page arXiv 2026

  68. [68]

    Kocsis, Z

    B. Kocsis, Z. Frei, Z. Haiman and K. Menou,Finding the electromagnetic counterparts of cosmological standard sirens,Astrophys. J.637(2006) 27

    2006

  69. [69]

    Dahlen et al.,A critical assessment of photometric redshift methods: A CANDELS investigation,Astrophys

    T. Dahlen et al.,A critical assessment of photometric redshift methods: A CANDELS investigation,Astrophys. J.775(2013) 93

    2013

  70. [70]

    Mass assembly in quiescent and star-forming galaxies since z=4 from UltraVISTA

    O. Ilbert et al.,Mass assembly in quiescent and star-forming galaxies sincez≃4from UltraVISTA,Astron. Astrophys.556(2013) A55 [1301.3157]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  71. [71]

    Gray et al.,Cosmological inference using gravitational wave standard sirens: A mock data analysis,Phys

    R. Gray et al.,Cosmological inference using gravitational wave standard sirens: A mock data analysis,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 122001

    2020

  72. [72]

    Gray et al.,Joint cosmological and gravitational-wave population inference using dark sirens and galaxy catalogues,J

    R. Gray et al.,Joint cosmological and gravitational-wave population inference using dark sirens and galaxy catalogues,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2023(2023) 023 [2308.02281]

    work page arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    Beyond the classical distance-redshift test: cross-correlating redshift-free standard candles and sirens with redshift surveys

    S. Mukherjee and B.D. Wandelt,Beyond the classical distance–redshift test: cross-correlating redshift-free standard candles and sirens with redshift surveys,arXiv e-prints(2018) [1808.06615]. – 46 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  74. [74]

    Schneider, V

    R. Schneider, V. Ferrari, S. Matarrese and S.F. Portegies Zwart,Low-frequency gravitational waves from massive black hole binaries: predictions for LISA and pulsar timing arrays, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.324(2001) 797

    2001

  75. [75]

    W. Zhao, C. Van Den Broeck, D. Baskaran and T.G.F. Li,Determination of dark energy by the Einstein Telescope: Comparing with CMB, BAO, and SNIa observations,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 023005

    2011

  76. [76]

    Belgacem, Y

    E. Belgacem, Y. Dirian, S. Foffa, E.J. Howell, M. Maggiore and T. Regimbau,Cosmology and dark energy from joint gravitational wave-GRB observations,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2019 (2019) 015 [1907.01487]

    work page arXiv 2019

  77. [77]

    Afroz and S

    S. Afroz and S. Mukherjee,The phase space of low-mass binary compact objects from LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA catalogue: hints on the chances of different formation scenarios, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.544(2025) 4689 [2505.22739]

    work page arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    THESEUS: a key space mission concept for Multi-Messenger Astrophysics

    L. Amati et al.,THESEUS: a key space mission concept for multi-messenger astrophysics, Adv. Space Res.62(2018) 191 [1712.08153]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  79. [79]

    Piro et al.,Athena synergies in the multi-messenger and transient universe,Exp

    L. Piro et al.,Athena synergies in the multi-messenger and transient universe,Exp. Astron.54 (2022) 23 [2110.15677]

    work page arXiv 2022

  80. [80]

    Bhalerao, S

    V. Bhalerao, S. Vadawale, S. Tendulkar et al.,Daksha: On alert for high energy transients, Exp. Astron.57(2024) 24 [2211.12055]

    work page arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.