The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2605.28126 · v1 · pith:GXV3LSQM · submitted 2026-05-27 · quant-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.stat-mech

Quantum Spin Squeezing Enhanced by Critical Exceptional Points

Yuma Nakanishi This is my paper

Reviewed by Pith2026-06-29 11:31 UTCgrok-4.3pith:GXV3LSQMopen to challenge →

classification quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords quantum spin squeezingcritical exceptional pointsdissipative spin systemscollective spinnonequilibrium criticalitysteady-state fluctuationsopen quantum systemsstability matrix
0
0 comments X

The pith

Critical exceptional points in dissipative spin systems make optimally squeezed variance scale linearly with the order parameter while anti-squeezed variance diverges inversely.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that open collective-spin systems possessing critical exceptional points reach a steady state with parametrically stronger quantum spin squeezing than would occur away from the point. Near the CEP the squeezed quadrature variance shrinks proportionally to the absolute value of the dimensionless order parameter Z, while the orthogonal anti-squeezed variance grows as the reciprocal of |Z|. The direction of the diverging fluctuations asymptotically coincides with the defective eigenvector of the stability matrix, and the scaling survives dephasing generated by spin components orthogonal to the critical mode. A reader would care because the result supplies a concrete mechanism for producing steady-state anisotropic quantum correlations in driven-dissipative platforms without additional control fields.

Core claim

Dissipative collective-spin systems that host critical exceptional points exhibit parametrically enhanced steady-state quantum spin squeezing. Close to the CEP the optimally squeezed variance scales as |Z|, the anti-squeezed variance diverges as |Z|^{-1}, and the anti-squeezed fluctuation axis aligns with the coalescing eigenvector of the stability matrix; these scalings remain intact against dephasing channels produced by spin components orthogonal to the coalesced critical mode.

What carries the argument

The critical exceptional point (CEP), the nonequilibrium point at which multiple collective excitation modes coalesce and the stability matrix becomes defective, whose eigenvector structure sets the scaling of steady-state quantum fluctuations.

If this is right

  • Steady-state squeezing is obtained directly from the dissipative dynamics without external feedback.
  • The squeezing is intrinsically anisotropic because the anti-squeezed quadrature locks to the coalescing eigenvector.
  • Dephasing from modes orthogonal to the critical collective mode does not destroy the scaling.
  • CEPs therefore constitute a design principle for engineering steady-state quantum correlations in driven-dissipative spin ensembles.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same defective-eigenvector mechanism could be tested in other open many-body platforms such as coupled resonators or Rydberg atoms.
  • Because the anti-squeezed direction is fixed by the CEP eigenvector, the squeezed quadrature may be aligned with a desired measurement axis by choice of driving phase.
  • If the scaling survives finite-size effects, the approach may improve steady-state metrology beyond the standard quantum limit in driven-dissipative sensors.

Load-bearing premise

The open system settles into a unique steady state whose quantum fluctuations are governed by the eigenvalue structure of a stability matrix evaluated at the CEP.

What would settle it

Measure the steady-state spin variances as the drive strength is tuned toward the CEP and check whether the squeezed variance decreases linearly with |Z| while the anti-squeezed variance increases as 1/|Z|.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28126 by Yuma Nakanishi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Top: schematic of collective excitation modes for the control parameter δ. The two linear collective modes (ar￾rows) approach each other and coalesce at the CEP (pink) into a single defective direction. Bottom: schematic illustration of the steady-state spin distribution on the Bloch sphere. Near the CEP, the distribution becomes strongly anisotropic and elon￾gated along the defective direction, whereas aw… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Numerical calculation of the dissipative collective spin model (10). (a) Order parameter ⟨mz⟩ and (b) Kitagawa Ueda spin-squeezing parameter ξ 2 S as functions of δ := (κ − κc)/ω in the steady-state, with g/ω = 2 . Colored solid lines are finite-S numerics, while the black dotted curve shows the large-S prediction. The pink marker indicates the CEP. (c-1)–(c-3) Husimi Q function of the steady state on the … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Critical exceptional points (CEPs) are nonequilibrium critical points in open many-body systems at which multiple collective excitation modes coalesce. CEPs are known to amplify classical fluctuations, but their effect on genuinely \textit{quantum} fluctuations remains unclear. Here, we show that dissipative collective-spin systems hosting CEPs exhibit parametrically enhanced steady-state \textit{quantum} spin squeezing. Close to the CEP, the optimally squeezed variance scales as $|Z|$, whereas the anti-squeezed variance diverges as $|Z|^{-1}$, with $Z$ the dimensionless order parameter. Importantly, the anti-squeezed fluctuation direction asymptotically aligns with the coalescing eigenvector of the stability matrix, reflecting the defective nature of the CEP dynamics. These scalings are robust against dephasing channels generated by spin components orthogonal to the coalesced critical collective mode. Our results identify CEPs as a route to engineering steady-state anisotropic quantum fluctuations and correlations in driven-dissipative platforms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that critical exceptional points (CEPs) in dissipative collective-spin systems produce parametrically enhanced steady-state quantum spin squeezing. Near the CEP the optimally squeezed variance scales linearly with |Z| (Z the dimensionless order parameter), the anti-squeezed variance diverges as |Z|^{-1}, and the anti-squeezed quadrature asymptotically aligns with the coalescing eigenvector of the stability matrix; the scalings remain robust against dephasing generated by spin components orthogonal to the critical mode.

Significance. If the stability-matrix derivation and scaling arguments hold, the work supplies a concrete mechanism by which CEPs can be used to engineer anisotropic quantum fluctuations in open many-body systems, with potential relevance to steady-state metrology and correlation engineering in driven-dissipative platforms. The explicit linkage between the defective eigenvalue structure and the direction of maximal anti-squeezing is a clear technical contribution.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the anti-squeezed fluctuation direction 'asymptotically aligns' with the coalescing eigenvector; a brief statement in the main text clarifying whether this alignment is exact at the CEP or only in the |Z| o 0 limit would remove ambiguity.
  2. The robustness claim is made with respect to 'dephasing channels generated by spin components orthogonal to the coalesced critical collective mode.' A short paragraph or appendix itemizing the explicit Lindblad operators considered would make the scope of this robustness immediately verifiable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work on quantum spin squeezing enhanced by critical exceptional points, including the accurate summary of the variance scalings and the linkage to the defective eigenvalue structure. The recommendation for minor revision is noted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation self-contained via stability matrix

full rationale

The abstract presents scalings of quantum spin squeezing variances near CEPs as following from the defective eigenvalue structure of a stability matrix in dissipative collective-spin systems. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are visible that would reduce any prediction to an input by construction. The claims rest on an independent analysis of steady-state fluctuations and robustness to orthogonal dephasing, with no load-bearing self-referential steps detectable. This is the expected outcome for a paper whose central derivation does not collapse to its own definitions or prior self-citations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete; the listed items are the minimal domain assumptions required to reach the stated claim from standard open-system theory.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The dynamics are captured by a Lindblad master equation for collective spin operators whose linearization yields a stability matrix with a defective eigenvalue at the CEP.
    Standard modeling choice for driven-dissipative spin systems; invoked implicitly when the paper refers to the stability matrix and coalescing eigenvectors.
  • domain assumption Dephasing channels act only through spin components orthogonal to the critical collective mode.
    Explicitly stated as the condition under which the scalings remain robust.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5697 in / 1433 out tokens · 44380 ms · 2026-06-29T11:31:17.955838+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Diehl, A

    S. Diehl, A. Micheli, A. Kantian, B. Kraus, H. P. B¨ uchler, and P. Zoller, Quantum states and phases in driven open quantum systems with cold atoms, Nature Physics4, 878 (2008)

    2008

  2. [2]

    L. M. Sieberer, S. D. Huber, E. Altman, and S. Diehl, Dy- namical critical phenomena in driven-dissipative systems, Physical Review Letters110, 195301 (2013)

    2013

  3. [3]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems, Reports on Progress in Physics79, 096001 (2016)

    2016

  4. [4]

    Minganti, A

    F. Minganti, A. Biella, N. Bartolo, and C. Ciuti, Spec- tral theory of Liouvillians for dissipative phase transitions, Physical Review A98, 042118 (2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    E. G. Dalla Torre, E. Demler, T. Giamarchi, and E. Alt- man, Quantum critical states and phase transitions in the presence of non-equilibrium noise, Nature Physics6, 806 (2010)

    2010

  6. [6]

    Marcuzzi, M

    M. Marcuzzi, M. Buchhold, S. Diehl, and I. Lesanovsky, Absorbing state phase transition with competing quantum and classical fluctuations, Physical Review Letters116, 245701 (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    Buchhold, B

    M. Buchhold, B. Everest, M. Marcuzzi, I. Lesanovsky, and S. Diehl, Nonequilibrium effective field theory for absorbing state phase transitions in driven open quantum spin systems, Physical Review B95, 014308 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    Marino and S

    J. Marino and S. Diehl, Driven markovian quantum criti- cality, Physical Review Letters116, 070407 (2016)

    2016

  9. [9]

    Marino and S

    J. Marino and S. Diehl, Quantum dynamical field theory for nonequilibrium phase transitions in driven open systems, Physical Review B94, 085150 (2016)

    2016

  10. [10]

    Russo and T

    F. Russo and T. Pohl, Quantum dissipative continuous time crystals, Physical Review Letters135, 110404 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, Clas- sics in Mathematics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1995)

    T. Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, Clas- sics in Mathematics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1995)

    1995

  12. [12]

    W. D. Heiss, The physics of exceptional points, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical45, 444016 (2012)

    2012

  13. [13]

    Ashida, Z

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-hermitian physics, Advances in Physics69, 249 (2020)

    2020

  14. [14]

    L. Feng, Z. J. Wong, R.-M. Ma, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Single-mode laser by parity-time symmetry breaking, Sci- ence346, 972 (2014)

    2014

  15. [15]

    Hodaei, M.-A

    H. Hodaei, M.-A. Miri, M. Heinrich, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Parity-time– symmetric microring lasers, Science346, 975 (2014)

    2014

  16. [16]

    A. Guo, G. J. Salamo, D. Duchesne, R. Morandotti, M. Volatier-Ravat, V. Aimez, G. A. Siviloglou, and D. N. Christodoulides, Observation of pt-symmetry breaking in complex optical potentials, Physical Review Letters103, 093902 (2009)

    2009

  17. [17]

    Zhang, W

    M. Zhang, W. Sweeney, C. W. Hsu, L. Yang, A. Stone, and L. Jiang, Quantum noise theory of exceptional point amplifying sensors, Physical Review Letters123, 180501 (2019)

    2019

  18. [18]

    Hodaei, A

    H. Hodaei, A. U. Hassan, S. Wittek, H. Garcia-Gracia, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Kha- javikhan, Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points, Nature548, 187 (2017)

    2017

  19. [19]

    S. Wang, B. Hou, W. Lu, Y. Chen, Z. Zhang, and C. T. 6 Chan, Arbitrary order exceptional point induced by pho- tonic spin–orbit interaction in coupled resonators, Nature Communications10, 832 (2019)

    2019

  20. [20]

    Ashida, S

    Y. Ashida, S. Furukawa, and M. Ueda, Parity-time- symmetric quantum critical phenomena, Nature Commu- nications8, 15791 (2017)

    2017

  21. [21]

    Hanai, A

    R. Hanai, A. Edelman, Y. Ohashi, and P. B. Littlewood, Non-hermitian phase transition from a polariton bose- einstein condensate to a photon laser, Physical Review Letters122, 185301 (2019)

    2019

  22. [22]

    Fruchart, R

    M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and V. Vitelli, Non-reciprocal phase transitions, Nature592, 363 (2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    Hanai and P

    R. Hanai and P. B. Littlewood, Critical fluctuations at a many-body exceptional point, Physical Review Research 2, 033018 (2020)

    2020

  24. [24]

    Belyansky, C

    R. Belyansky, C. Weis, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and A. A. Clerk, Phase transitions in nonreciprocal driven- dissipative condensates, Physical Review Letters135, 123401 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    Nakanishi, R

    Y. Nakanishi, R. Hanai, and T. Sasamoto, Continuous time crystals as a PT symmetric state and the emergence of critical exceptional points (2024), arXiv:2406.09018

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    C. P. Zelle, R. Daviet, A. Rosch, and S. Diehl, Universal phenomenology at critical exceptional points of nonequi- librium O(n) models, Physical Review X14, 021052 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    Suchanek, K

    T. Suchanek, K. Kroy, and S. A. M. Loos, Irreversible mesoscale fluctuations herald the emergence of dynamical phases, Physical Review Letters131, 258302 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    Suchanek, K

    T. Suchanek, K. Kroy, and S. A. M. Loos, Entropy pro- duction in the nonreciprocal cahn-hilliard model, Physical Review E108, 064610 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    Z. You, A. Baskaran, and M. C. Marchetti, Nonreciprocity as a generic route to traveling states, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117, 19767 (2020)

    2020

  30. [30]

    Nakanishi and T

    Y. Nakanishi and T. Sasamoto, Lindbladian PT phase tran- sitions (2025), arXiv:2512.24981 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    D. J. Wineland, J. J. Bollinger, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Heinzen, Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy, Physical Review A50, 67 (1994)

    1994

  32. [32]

    A. S. Sørensen and K. Mølmer, Entanglement and extreme spin squeezing, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 4431 (2001)

    2001

  33. [33]

    Pezz `e, A

    L. Pezz `e, A. Smerzi, M. K. Oberthaler, R. Schmied, and P. Treutlein, Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles, Reviews of Modern Physics90, 035005 (2018)

    2018

  34. [34]

    Est `eve, C

    J. Est `eve, C. Gross, A. Weller, S. Giovanazzi, and M. K. Oberthaler, Squeezing and entanglement in a bose-einstein condensate, Nature455, 1216 (2008)

    2008

  35. [35]

    Gross, T

    C. Gross, T. Zibold, E. Nicklas, J. Est `eve, and M. K. Oberthaler, Nonlinear atom interferometer surpasses clas- sical precision limit, Nature464, 1165 (2010)

    2010

  36. [36]

    M. F. Riedel, P. B¨ohi, Y. Li, T. W. H¨ansch, A. Sinatra, and P. Treutlein, Atom-chip-based generation of entanglement for quantum metrology, Nature464, 1170 (2010)

    2010

  37. [37]

    M¨ ussel, H

    W. M¨ ussel, H. Strobel, D. Linnemann, D. B. Hume, and M. K. Oberthaler, Scalable spin squeezing for quantum- enhanced magnetometry with bose-einstein condensates, Physical Review Letters113, 103004 (2014)

    2014

  38. [38]

    I. D. Leroux, M. H. Schleier-Smith, and V. Vuleti´c, Imple- mentation of cavity squeezing of a collective atomic spin, Physical Review Letters104, 073602 (2010)

    2010

  39. [39]

    Hosten, N

    O. Hosten, N. J. Engelsen, R. Krishnakumar, and M. A. Kasevich, Measurement noise 100 times lower than the quantum-projection limit using entangled atoms, Nature 529, 505 (2016)

    2016

  40. [40]

    R. J. Sewell, M. Koschorreck, M. Napolitano, B. Dubost, N. Behbood, and M. W. Mitchell, Magnetic sensitivity be- yond the projection noise limit by spin squeezing, Physical Review Letters109, 253605 (2012)

    2012

  41. [41]

    J. G. Bohnet, B. C. Sawyer, J. W. Britton, M. L. Wall, A. M. Rey, M. Foss-Feig, and J. J. Bollinger, Quantum spin dynamics and entanglement generation with hundreds of trapped ions, Science352, 1297 (2016)

    2016

  42. [42]

    Bornet, G

    G. Bornet, G. Emperauger, C. Chen, B. Ye, M. Block, M. Bintz, J. A. Boyd, D. Barredo, T. Comparin, F. Mezza- capo, T. Roscilde, T. Lahaye, N. Y. Yao, and A. Browaeys, Scalable spin squeezing in a dipolar rydberg atom array, Nature621, 728 (2023)

    2023

  43. [43]

    J. A. Hines, S. V. Rajagopal, G. L. Moreau, M. D. Wahrman, N. A. Lewis, O. Markovi ´c, and M. Schleier- Smith, Spin squeezing by rydberg dressing in an array of atomic ensembles, Physical Review Letters131, 063401 (2023)

    2023

  44. [44]

    Pedrozo-Pe ˜nafiel, S

    E. Pedrozo-Pe ˜nafiel, S. Colombo, C. Shu, A. F. Adiy- atullin, Z. Li, E. Mendez, B. Braverman, A. Kawasaki, D. Akamatsu, Y. Xiao, and V. Vuleti´c, Entanglement on an optical atomic-clock transition, Nature588, 414 (2020)

    2020

  45. [45]

    W. J. Eckner, N. Darkwah Oppong, A. Cao, A. W. Young, W. R. Milner, J. M. Robinson, J. Ye, and A. M. Kaufman, Realizing spin squeezing with rydberg interactions in an optical clock, Nature621, 734 (2023)

    2023

  46. [46]

    J. M. Robinson, M. Miklos, Y. M. Tso, C. J. Kennedy, T. Bothwell, D. Kedar, J. K. Thompson, and J. Ye, Direct comparison of two spin-squeezed optical clock ensembles at the 10−17 level, Nature Physics20, 208 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    W. Wu, E. J. Davis, L. B. Hughes, B. Ye, Z. Wang, D. Kufel, T. Ono, S. A. Meynell, M. Block, C. Liu, H. Yang, A. C. Bleszynski Jayich, and N. Y. Yao, Spin squeezing in an ensemble of nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond, Nature 646, 74 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    Gorini, A

    V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Com- pletely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems, Journal of Mathematical Physics17, 821 (1976)

    1976

  49. [49]

    Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics48, 119 (1976)

    G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics48, 119 (1976)

    1976

  50. [50]

    Carollo and I

    F. Carollo and I. Lesanovsky, Applicability of mean-field theory for time-dependent open quantum systems with infinite-range interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 150401 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    Dubois, U

    J. Dubois, U. Saalmann, and J. M. Rost, Semi-classical lindblad master equation for spin dynamics, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.54, 235201 (2021)

    2021

  52. [52]

    Fiorelli, Quantum fluctuation dynamics of open quan- tum systems with collective operator-valued rates, and applications to hopfield-like networks, J

    E. Fiorelli, Quantum fluctuation dynamics of open quan- tum systems with collective operator-valued rates, and applications to hopfield-like networks, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.57, 325003 (2024)

    2024

  53. [53]

    Kitagawa and M

    M. Kitagawa and M. Ueda, Squeezed spin states, Phys. Rev. A47, 5138 (1993)

    1993

  54. [54]

    Huber, P

    J. Huber, P. Kirton, and P. Rabl, Nonequilibrium magnetic phases in spin lattices with gain and loss, Physical Review A102, 012219 (2020)

    2020

  55. [55]

    Huber, P

    J. Huber, P. Kirton, S. Rotter, and P. Rabl, Emergence of 7 PT-symmetry breaking in open quantum systems, SciPost Phys.9, 052 (2020)

    2020

  56. [56]

    Nakanishi and T

    Y. Nakanishi and T. Sasamoto, PT phase transition in open quantum systems with lindblad dynamics, Phys. Rev. A 105, 022219 (2022)

    2022

  57. [57]

    Nakanishi and T

    Y. Nakanishi and T. Sasamoto, Dissipative time crystals originating from parity-time symmetry, Phys. Rev. A107, L010201 (2023)

    2023

  58. [58]

    Since ˜Tis anti-linear, i→ −i, the n-PT covariance offbecomesg( ˜P ˜TM)= − ˜P ˜Tg(M)

    The minus sign is a consequence of the conventioni ˙M= f(M)withf:=igand ˙M=g(M). Since ˜Tis anti-linear, i→ −i, the n-PT covariance offbecomesg( ˜P ˜TM)= − ˜P ˜Tg(M)

  59. [59]

    See Supplemental Material for details

  60. [60]

    Piccitto, M

    G. Piccitto, M. Wauters, F. Nori, and N. Shammah, Sym- metries and conserved quantities of boundary time crystals in generalized spin models, Physical Review B104, 014307 (2021)

    2021

  61. [61]

    (9) sur- vives [76, 77]

    Even atω=0, the same squeezing scaling in Eq. (9) sur- vives [76, 77]. At this point, however, the projected2×2 tangent-plane dynamics no longer exhibits an exceptional point, although the full3×3linearized matrix remains at a CEP. Thus, what fails atω=0is only the tangent-plane geometric interpretation, not the squeezing scaling itself

  62. [62]

    D. J. Wineland, J. J. Bollinger, W. M. Itano, F. L. Moore, and D. J. Heinzen, Spin squeezing and reduced quantum noise in spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. A46, R6797 (1992)

    1992

  63. [63]

    Pezz `e and A

    L. Pezz `e and A. Smerzi, Entanglement, nonlinear dynam- ics, and the heisenberg limit, Physical Review Letters102, 100401 (2009)

    2009

  64. [64]

    Hyllus, W

    P. Hyllus, W. Laskowski, R. Krischek, C. Schwemmer, W. Wieczorek, H. Weinfurter, L. Pezz `e, and A. Smerzi, Fisher information and multiparticle entanglement, Phys. Rev. A85, 022321 (2012)

    2012

  65. [65]

    T ´oth, Multipartite entanglement and high-precision metrology, Phys

    G. T ´oth, Multipartite entanglement and high-precision metrology, Phys. Rev. A85, 022322 (2012)

    2012

  66. [66]

    In addition, each stable PT-broken fixed point is nondegenerate and has a finite excitation gap [30]

    For the class (3), a gapped steady state admits an asymptoti- cally exact semiclassical mean-field description in the ther- modynamic limit [78]. In addition, each stable PT-broken fixed point is nondegenerate and has a finite excitation gap [30]. Therefore, when the dynamics selects a single stable PT-broken branch, the corresponding steady state is expe...

  67. [67]

    P. A. Rikvold, B. M. Gorman, and M. A. Novotny, Crit- ical finite-range scaling in scalar-field theories and ising models, Physical Review E47, 1474 (1993)

    1993

  68. [68]

    Colonna-Romano, H

    L. Colonna-Romano, H. Gould, and W. Klein, Anomalous mean-field behavior of the fully connected ising model, Physical Review E90, 042111 (2014)

    2014

  69. [69]

    Somech and E

    O. Somech and E. Shahmoon, Quantum entangled states of a classically radiating macroscopic spin, PRX Quantum 5, 010349 (2024)

    2024

  70. [70]

    Critical Steady States of All-to-All Driven-Dissipative Models:

    D. Barberena and A. M. Rey, Critical steady states of all-to-all squeezed and driven superradiance: An analytic approach, Phys. Rev. A109, 013709 (2024), arXiv:2307.05115 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    E. Y. Song, D. Barberena, D. J. Young, E. Chaparro, A. Chu, S. Agarwal, Z. Niu, J. T. Young, A. M. Rey, and J. K. Thompson, A dissipation-induced superradiant transition in a strontium cavity-QED system, Science Ad- vances11, eadu5799 (2025)

    2025

  72. [72]

    Groszkowski, M

    P. Groszkowski, M. Koppenh ¨ofer, H.-K. Lau, and A. A. Clerk, Reservoir-engineered spin squeezing: macroscopic even-odd effects and hybrid-systems implementations, Phys. Rev. X12, 011015 (2022)

    2022

  73. [73]

    E. G. Dalla Torre, J. Otterbach, E. Demler, V. Vuleti ´c, and M. D. Lukin, Dissipative preparation of spin squeezed atomic ensembles in a steady state, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 120402 (2013)

    2013

  74. [74]

    T. E. Lee, F. Reiter, and N. Moiseyev, Entanglement and spin squeezing in non-hermitian phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 250401 (2014)

    2014

  75. [75]

    A similar nilpotent matrix can appear in the semiclas- sical phase-space description of an isolated Hamiltonian collective-spin system, or in the bosonic Bogoliubov dy- namical matrix of a Hermitian quadratic Hamiltonian [79– 81]. This reflects zero-frequency softening of a Hermitian system in an effective first-order dynamical representation, not an exce...

  76. [76]

    Carollo and I

    F. Carollo and I. Lesanovsky, Exact solution of a bound- ary time-crystal phase transition: Time-translation sym- metry breaking and non-markovian dynamics of correla- tions, Physical Review A105, L040202 (2022)

    2022

  77. [77]

    Buonaiuto, F

    G. Buonaiuto, F. Carollo, B. Olmos, and I. Lesanovsky, Dynamical phases and quantum correlations in an emitter- waveguide system with feedback, Physical Review Letters 127, 133601 (2021)

    2021

  78. [78]

    da Silva Souza, L

    L. da Silva Souza, L. F. Dos Prazeres, and F. Iemini, Suf- ficient condition for gapless spin-boson Lindbladians, and its connection to dissipative time crystals, Physical Review Letters130, 180401 (2023)

    2023

  79. [79]

    V. P. Flynn, E. Cobanera, and L. Viola, Decon- structing effective non-hermitian dynamics in quadratic bosonic hamiltonians, New J. Phys.22, 083004 (2020), arXiv:2003.03405 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  80. [80]

    D. Xie, C. Xu, and A. M. Wang, Quantum phases transition revealed by the exceptional point in hopfield- bogoliubov matrix, Physical Review A104, 062418 (2021), arXiv:2109.06553 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.