pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.28404 · v1 · pith:Y3HCQ27Znew · submitted 2026-05-27 · 🪐 quant-ph

On the existence of fully inseparable biseparable Gaussian states

Olga Leskovjanov\'a , Kl\'ara Baksov\'a , Jan Provazn\'ik , Ladislav Mi\v{s}ta , Jr. , Nicolai Friis This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 11:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords Gaussian statesfull inseparabilitybiseparabilitygenuine multipartite entanglementquantum entanglementmultimode systemsentanglement witnessescontinuous-variable systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

All fully inseparable Gaussian states turn out to be genuinely multipartite entangled.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines whether Gaussian states can be fully inseparable while still expressible as mixtures of states separable across different bipartite partitions. For several standard families of multimode Gaussian states, projections onto finite-dimensional subspaces combined with fully decomposable witnesses show that candidate regions for such mixed separability shrink steadily as the subspace dimension increases. This pattern leads to the conjecture that no fully inseparable biseparable Gaussian states exist, so full inseparability in the Gaussian setting always implies genuine multipartite entanglement. A sympathetic reader would care because this would simplify the resource classification of continuous-variable entanglement and rule out an entire expected class of states.

Core claim

The authors show for archetypical families of multimode Gaussian states that regions of candidate fully inseparable biseparable states shrink under projections to finite-dimensional subspaces of increasing dimension when tested with fully decomposable witnesses, and they therefore conjecture that every fully inseparable Gaussian state is genuinely multipartite entangled.

What carries the argument

Finite-dimensional subspace projections combined with fully decomposable witnesses that detect the shrinking of candidate regions for fully inseparable biseparable states.

If this is right

  • Full inseparability becomes equivalent to genuine multipartite entanglement for all Gaussian states.
  • No Gaussian state can be prepared as a convex mixture of biseparable states across different partitions while still being fully inseparable.
  • Entanglement classification for continuous-variable systems simplifies because one expected intermediate class is ruled out.
  • Witness-based detection methods for Gaussian states gain a stronger guarantee that detected full inseparability implies genuine multipartite entanglement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the conjecture holds, numerical searches for Gaussian entanglement resources can safely treat full inseparability and genuine multipartite entanglement as interchangeable labels.
  • The same projection technique might be applied to other continuous-variable state families to test whether the equivalence extends beyond Gaussians.
  • Experimental preparation of multimode Gaussian light could focus on verifying genuine multipartite entanglement once full inseparability is confirmed, without separate checks for biseparability.

Load-bearing premise

That continued shrinking of the candidate regions as the projection dimension grows implies the complete absence of fully inseparable biseparable states for the original infinite-dimensional Gaussian states.

What would settle it

An explicit multimode Gaussian covariance matrix whose entanglement properties remain fully inseparable and biseparable after the limit of increasing projection dimension is taken.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28404 by Jan Provazn\'ik, Jr., Kl\'ara Baksov\'a, Ladislav Mi\v{s}ta, Nicolai Friis, Olga Leskovjanov\'a.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Graphical representation of sets of tripartite states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Comparison of ranges of the squeezing parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison of regions where the Gaussian state with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Regions of partition separability (small white region [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Genuine multipartite entanglement and full inseparability are two inequivalent quantum resources. Even though all genuinely multipartite entangled states are also fully inseparable, not all fully inseparable states are genuinely multipartite entangled. There exist fully inseparable states that can be prepared as convex mixtures of states separable with respect to different bipartite splits. Here, we are interested in examples of Gaussian states that possess this type of entanglement, so-called fully inseparable biseparable states. We show for several archetypical families of multimode Gaussian states that fully inseparable biseparable candidate states are actually genuinely multipartite entangled. Using projections to finite-dimensional subspaces and fully decomposable witnesses, we observe a shrinking of the regions of potentially fully inseparable biseparable Gaussian states with growing dimension of the projection subspaces. We therefore conjecture that all fully inseparable Gaussian states are genuinely multipartite entangled.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper investigates whether fully inseparable biseparable Gaussian states exist among multimode continuous-variable systems. For several archetypical families, the authors apply projections to finite-dimensional subspaces combined with fully decomposable witnesses and report that candidate regions for fully inseparable biseparable states shrink as the projection dimension increases. On this basis they conjecture that all fully inseparable Gaussian states are genuinely multipartite entangled.

Significance. If the conjecture is correct, it would show that the two entanglement notions coincide for Gaussian states, in contrast to the general case where fully inseparable biseparable states are known to exist. The numerical evidence obtained from independent witnesses and systematic projection is suggestive for the families examined and constitutes a concrete step toward resolving the question in the Gaussian setting.

major comments (2)
  1. [abstract] Abstract (final paragraph): the conjecture that shrinking of candidate regions under finite-dimensional projections implies the non-existence of fully inseparable biseparable states in the infinite-dimensional Gaussian limit is not supported by a rigorous limit argument. The possibility remains that a state could be biseparable with respect to varying partitions only when the full infinite-dimensional space is considered, with the entanglement signature appearing outside every finite subspace.
  2. [abstract] Abstract: the numerical analysis is performed only on several archetypical families, yet the conjecture is formulated for the entire class of multimode Gaussian states. This extrapolation is load-bearing for the central claim and requires either additional analytic support or explicit qualification of the conjecture's scope.
minor comments (1)
  1. The description of the projection procedure and the precise range of subspace dimensions employed could be stated more explicitly to allow readers to assess the rate of shrinkage.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, proposing revisions to qualify the conjecture appropriately.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [abstract] Abstract (final paragraph): the conjecture that shrinking of candidate regions under finite-dimensional projections implies the non-existence of fully inseparable biseparable states in the infinite-dimensional Gaussian limit is not supported by a rigorous limit argument. The possibility remains that a state could be biseparable with respect to varying partitions only when the full infinite-dimensional space is considered, with the entanglement signature appearing outside every finite subspace.

    Authors: We agree that the observed shrinking of candidate regions under increasing projection dimension provides only numerical support and does not constitute a rigorous limit argument establishing non-existence in the infinite-dimensional case. The conjecture is presented as such, and the possibility noted by the referee cannot be excluded on the basis of our analysis. We will revise the abstract to explicitly describe the claim as a numerically motivated conjecture without a rigorous proof of the infinite-dimensional implication. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [abstract] Abstract: the numerical analysis is performed only on several archetypical families, yet the conjecture is formulated for the entire class of multimode Gaussian states. This extrapolation is load-bearing for the central claim and requires either additional analytic support or explicit qualification of the conjecture's scope.

    Authors: The numerical evidence is restricted to the archetypical families described in the manuscript. We accept that formulating the conjecture for all multimode Gaussian states requires qualification. We will revise the abstract to limit the stated conjecture to the families examined, while retaining the broader motivation for the Gaussian setting. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; numerical observations and conjecture are independent of fitted inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper's central steps consist of applying known fully decomposable witnesses and finite-dimensional projections drawn from prior independent literature to several families of multimode Gaussian states, observing contraction of candidate regions, and extrapolating to a conjecture. No equation reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, no load-bearing premise rests on a self-citation chain, and the conjecture is explicitly presented as an observational extrapolation rather than a definitional identity. The analysis is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard domain assumptions about Gaussian states and entanglement witnesses; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Gaussian states are completely characterized by their first and second moments (covariance matrix)
    Implicit in the choice of multimode Gaussian states as the object of study
  • domain assumption Fully decomposable witnesses can certify genuine multipartite entanglement when applied to projected states
    Used to observe the shrinking of candidate regions

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5696 in / 1345 out tokens · 23720 ms · 2026-06-29T11:45:37.360188+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · 48 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Stefan B¨ auml and Koji Azuma,Fundamental limitation on quantum broadcast networks,Quantum Sci. Technol. 2, 024004 (2017), arXiv:1609.03994

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  2. [2]

    Multi-partite entanglement speeds up quantum key distribution in networks

    Michael Epping, Hermann Kampermann, Chiara Mac- chiavello, and Dagmar Bruß,Multi-partite entanglement can speed up quantum key distribution in networks,New J. Phys.19, 093012 (2017), arXiv:1612.05585

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Matej Pivoluska, Marcus Huber, and Mehul Malik,Lay- ered quantum key distribution,Phys. Rev. A97, 032312 (2018), arXiv:1709.00377

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    J´ er´ emy Ribeiro, Gl´ aucia Murta, and Stephanie Wehner,Fully device-independent conference key agree- ment,Phys. Rev. A97, 022307 (2018), arXiv:1708.00798

    work page arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Richard Jozsa and Noah Linden,On the Role of En- tanglement in Quantum-Computational Speed-Up,Proc. Roy. Soc. A Math. Phys.459, 2011 (2003), arXiv:quant- ph/0201143

    work page arXiv 2011

  6. [6]

    Dagmar Bruß and Chiara Macchiavello,Multipartite en- tanglement in quantum algorithms,Phys. Rev. A83, 052313 (2011), arXiv:1007.4179. 10

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  7. [7]

    Scott,Multipartite entanglement, quantum- error-correcting codes, and entangling power of quantum evolutions,Phys

    Andrew J. Scott,Multipartite entanglement, quantum- error-correcting codes, and entangling power of quantum evolutions,Phys. Rev. A69, 052330 (2004), arXiv:quant- ph/0310137

    work page arXiv 2004

  8. [8]

    Quantum computing via measurements only

    Robert Raussendorf and Hans J. Briegel,A One-Way Quantum Computer,Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 5188 (2001), arXiv:quant-ph/0010033

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  9. [9]

    Persistent entanglement in arrays of interacting particles

    Hans J. Briegel and Robert Raussendorf,Persistent En- tanglement in Arrays of Interacting Particles,Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 910 (2001), arXiv:quant-ph/0004051

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  10. [10]

    The structure of multidimensional entanglement in multipartite systems

    Marcus Huber and Julio I. de Vicente,Structure of multi- dimensional entanglement in multipartite systems,Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 030501 (2013), arXiv:1210.6876

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  11. [11]

    The maximally entangled set of multipartite quantum states

    Julio I. de Vicente, Cornelia Spee, and Barbara Kraus,Maximally Entangled Set of Multipartite Quan- tum States,Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 110502 (2013), arXiv:1305.7398

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    Entanglement manipulation of multipartite pure states with finite rounds of classical communication

    Julio I. de Vicente, Cornelia Spee, David Sauerwein, and Barbara Kraus,Entanglement manipulation of multipar- tite pure states with finite rounds of classical communica- tion,Phys. Rev. A95, 012323 (2017), arXiv:1607.05145

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  13. [13]

    Oskar S lowik, Martin Hebenstreit, Barbara Kraus, and Adam Sawicki,A link between symmetries of critical states and the structure of SLOCC classes in multipartite systems,Quantum4, 300 (2020), arXiv:1912.00099

    work page arXiv 2020

  14. [14]

    Entangled pure state transformations via local operations assisted by finitely many rounds of classical communication

    Cornelia Spee, Julio I. de Vicente, David Sauerwein, and Barbara Kraus,Entangled Pure State Transformations via Local Operations Assisted by Finitely Many Rounds of Classical Communication,Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 040503 (2017), arXiv:1606.04418

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    Simon Morelli, David Sauerwein, Michalis Skotiniotis, and Nicolai Friis,Metrology-assisted entanglement dis- tribution in noisy quantum networks,Quantum6, 722 (2022), arXiv:2110.15627

    work page arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Cornelia Spee and Tristan Kraft,Transformations in quantum networks via local operations assisted by finitely many rounds of classical communication,Quantum8, 1286 (2024), arXiv:2105.01090

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    de Vicente, and Barbara Kraus,Identifying families of multipartite states with non-trivial local en- tanglement transformations,Quantum8, 1270 (2024), arXiv:2302.03139

    Nicky Kai Hong Li, Cornelia Spee, Martin Hebenstreit, Julio I. de Vicente, and Barbara Kraus,Identifying families of multipartite states with non-trivial local en- tanglement transformations,Quantum8, 1270 (2024), arXiv:2302.03139

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    G´ eza T´ oth and Otfried G¨ uhne,Detecting Genuine Multipartite Entanglement with Two Local Measure- ments,Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 060501 (2005), arXiv:quant- ph/0405165

    work page arXiv 2005

  19. [19]

    Entanglement detection

    Otfried G¨ uhne and G´ eza T´ oth,Entanglement detection, Phys. Rep.474, 1 (2009), arXiv:0811.2803

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  20. [20]

    Criterion for k-separability in mixed multipartite systems

    Andreas Gabriel, Beatrix C. Hiesmayr, and Marcus Huber,Criterion for k-separability in mixed multipar- tite systems,Quantum Inf. Comput.10, 0829 (2010), arXiv:1002.2953

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  21. [21]

    Observation of Entangled States of a Fully Controlled 20-Qubit System

    Nicolai Friis, Oliver Marty, Christine Maier, Cornelius Hempel, Milan Holz¨ apfel, Petar Jurcevic, Martin B. Ple- nio, Marcus Huber, Christian Roos, Rainer Blatt, and Ben Lanyon,Observation of Entangled States of a Fully Controlled 20-Qubit System,Phys. Rev. X8, 021012 (2018), arXiv:1711.11092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Nicolai Friis, Giuseppe Vitagliano, Mehul Malik, and Marcus Huber,Entanglement Certification From The- ory to Experiment,Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 72 (2019), arXiv:1906.10929

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    Mu˜ noz-Arias, Kevin Reuer, Marcus Huber, and Nicolai Friis,Detecting genuine multipartite entanglement in multi-qubit devices with restricted measurements,Nat

    Nicky Kai Hong Li, Xi Dai, Manuel H. Mu˜ noz-Arias, Kevin Reuer, Marcus Huber, and Nicolai Friis,Detecting genuine multipartite entanglement in multi-qubit devices with restricted measurements,Nat. Commun.17, 1707 (2026), arXiv:2504.21076

    work page arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    Quantum information with continuous variables

    Samuel L. Braunstein and Peter van Loock,Quantum information with continuous variables,Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513 (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0410100

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  25. [25]

    Gaussian Quantum Information

    Christian Weedbrook, Stefano Pirandola, Ra´ ul Garc´ ıa- Patr´ on, Nicolas J. Cerf, Timothy C. Ralph, Jeffrey H. Shapiro, and Seth Lloyd,Gaussian quantum informa- tion,Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 621 (2012), arXiv:1110.3234

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  26. [26]

    Continuous variable quantum information: Gaussian states and beyond

    Gerardo Adesso, Sammy Ragy, and Antony R. Lee,Con- tinuous Variable Quantum Information: Gaussian States and Beyond,Open Syst. Inf. Dyn.21, 1440001 (2014), arXiv:1401.4679

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  27. [27]

    Geza Giedke, Barbara Kraus, Maciej Lewenstein, and Juan Ignacio Cirac,Separability properties of three- mode Gaussian states,Phys. Rev. A64, 052303 (2001), arXiv:quant-ph/0103137

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  28. [28]

    Gerardo Adesso, Alessio Serafini, and Fabrizio Illu- minati,Multipartite entanglement in three-mode Gaus- sian states of continuous variable systems: Quantifica- tion, sharing structure and decoherence,Phys. Rev. A 73, 032345 (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0512124

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  29. [29]

    Tohya Hiroshima, Gerardo Adesso, and Fabrizio Il- luminati,Monogamy Inequality for Distributed Gaus- sian Entanglement,Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 050503 (2007), arXiv:quant-ph/0605021

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  30. [30]

    Criteria for genuine N-partite continuous variable entanglement and Einstein-Podolsky_Rosen steering

    Run Yan Teh and Margaret D. Reid,Criteria for genuine n-partite continuous-variable entanglement and einstein- podolsky-rosen steering,Phys. Rev. A90, 062337 (2014), arXiv:1310.2690

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  31. [31]

    Kl´ ara Baksov´ a, Olga Leskovjanov´ a, Ladislav Miˇ sta Jr., Elizabeth Agudelo, and Nicolai Friis,Multi-copy activation of genuine multipartite entanglement in continuous-variable systems,Quantum9, 1699 (2025), arXiv:2312.16570

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Philipp Hyllus and Jens Eisert,Optimal entanglement witnesses for continuous-variable systems,New J. Phys. 8, 51 (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0510077

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  33. [33]

    Multipartite entanglement for continuous variables: A quantum teleportation network

    Peter van Loock and Samuel L. Braunstein,Multipar- tite Entanglement for Continuous Variables: A Quantum Teleportation Network,Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 3482 (2000), arXiv:quant-ph/9906021

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  34. [34]

    Bastian Jungnitsch, Tobias Moroder, and Otfried G¨ uhne,Taming Multiparticle Entanglement,Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 190502 (2011), arXiv:1010.6049

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  35. [35]

    Hayata Yamasaki, Simon Morelli, Markus Miethlinger, Jessica Bavaresco, Nicolai Friis, and Marcus Huber,Ac- tivation of genuine multipartite entanglement: beyond the single-copy paradigm of entanglement characterisa- tion,Quantum6, 695 (2022), arXiv:2106.01372

    work page arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    de Vicente,Gen- uine multipartite entanglement of quantum states in the multiple-copy scenario,Quantum6, 735 (2022), arXiv:2201.08694

    Carlos Palazuelos and Julio I. de Vicente,Gen- uine multipartite entanglement of quantum states in the multiple-copy scenario,Quantum6, 735 (2022), arXiv:2201.08694

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Robert St´ arek, Tim Gollerthan, Olga Leskovjanov´ a, Michael Meth, Peter Tirler, Nicolai Friis, Martin Ring- bauer, and Ladislav Miˇ sta Jr.,Experimental Verifi- cation of Multicopy Activation of Genuine Multipartite Entanglement,Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 160201 (2026), arXiv:2510.12457

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    Rui Zhang, Yue-Yang Fei, Zhenhuan Liu, Xingjian Zhang, Xu-Fei Yin, Yingqiu Mao, Li Li, Nai-Le Liu, Ot- 11 fried G¨ uhne, Xiongfeng Ma, Yu-Ao Chen, and Jian-Wei Pan,Entanglement Superactivation in Multiphoton Dis- tillation Networks,arXiv:2510.26290 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    Wigner,On the Quantum Correction For Thermodynamic Equilibrium,Phys

    Eugene P. Wigner,On the Quantum Correction For Thermodynamic Equilibrium,Phys. Rev.40, 749 (1932)

    1932

  40. [40]

    Simon, N

    R. Simon, N. Mukunda, and Biswadeb Dutta,Quantum- noise matrix for multimode systems: U(n) invariance, squeezing, and normal forms,Phys. Rev. A49, 1567 (1994)

    1994

  41. [41]

    Rajiah Simon,Peres-Horodecki Separability Criterion for Continuous Variable Systems,Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 2726 (2000), arXiv:quant-ph/9909044

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  42. [42]

    Werner,Quantum states with Einstein- Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model,Phys

    Reinhard F. Werner,Quantum states with Einstein- Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model,Phys. Rev. A40, 4277 (1989)

    1989

  43. [43]

    Ryszard Horodecki, Pawe l Horodecki, Micha l Horodecki, and Karol Horodecki,Quantum entanglement,Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 865 (2009), arXiv:quant-ph/0702225

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  44. [44]

    Jean-Daniel Bancal, Nicolas Gisin, Yeong-Cherng Liang, and Stefano Pironio,Device-Independent Witnesses of Genuine Multipartite Entanglement,Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 250404 (2011), arXiv:1102.0197

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  45. [45]

    Bertlmann and Nicolai Friis,Modern Quan- tum Theory – From Quantum Mechanics to Entan- glement and Quantum Information(Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K., 2023)

    Reinhold A. Bertlmann and Nicolai Friis,Modern Quan- tum Theory – From Quantum Mechanics to Entan- glement and Quantum Information(Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K., 2023)

    2023

  46. [46]

    Micha l Horodecki, Pawe l Horodecki, and Ryszard Horodecki,Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions,Phys. Lett. A223, 25 (1996), arXiv:quant-ph/9605038

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  47. [47]

    Asher Peres,Separability Criterion for Density Matri- ces,Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 1413 (1996), arXiv:quant- ph/9604005

    work page arXiv 1996

  48. [48]

    Bound entangled Gaussian states

    Reinhard F. Werner and Michael M. Wolf,Bound Entan- gled Gaussian States,Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 3658 (2001), arXiv:quant-ph/0009118

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  49. [49]

    Nicolai Friis, Marcus Huber, Ivette Fuentes, and David Edward Bruschi,Quantum gates and multi- partite entanglement resonances realized by nonuni- form cavity motion,Phys. Rev. D86, 105003 (2012), arXiv:1207.1827

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  50. [50]

    G´ eza T´ oth and Otfried G¨ uhne,Entanglement detection in the stabilizer formalism,Phys. Rev. A72, 022340 (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0501020

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  51. [51]

    Koenraad M. R. Audenaert and Martin B. Plenio,En- tanglement on mixed stabilizer states: normal forms and reduction procedures,New J. Phys.7, 170 (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0505036

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  52. [52]

    Graeme Smith and Debbie Leung,Typical entanglement of stabilizer states,Phys. Rev. A74, 062314 (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0510232

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  53. [53]

    Briegel,Entanglement in graph states and its appli- cations,Proceedings of the International School of Physics ”Enrico Fermi”162, 115 (2005), arXiv:quant- ph/0602096

    Marc Hein, Wolfgang D¨ ur, Jens Eisert, Robert Raussendorf, Maarten Van den Nest, and Hans J. Briegel,Entanglement in graph states and its appli- cations,Proceedings of the International School of Physics ”Enrico Fermi”162, 115 (2005), arXiv:quant- ph/0602096

    work page arXiv 2005

  54. [54]

    Bastian Jungnitsch, Tobias Moroder, and Otfried G¨ uhne,Entanglement witnesses for graph states: Gen- eral theory and examples,Phys. Rev. A84, 032310 (2011), arXiv:1106.1114

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  55. [55]

    You Zhou, Qi Zhao, Xiao Yuan, and Xiongfeng Ma,Detecting multipartite entanglement structure with minimal resources,npj Quantum Inf.5, 83 (2019), arXiv:1904.05001

    work page arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    Otfried G¨ uhne and Michael Seevinck,Separability crite- ria for genuine multiparticle entanglement,New J. Phys. 12, 053002 (2010), arXiv:0905.1349

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  57. [57]

    Detection of high-dimensional genuine multi-partite entanglement of mixed states

    Marcus Huber, Florian Mintert, Andreas Gabriel, and Beatrix C. Hiesmayr,Detection of High-Dimensional Genuine Multipartite Entanglement of Mixed States, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 210501 (2010), arXiv:0912.1870

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  58. [58]

    Marcel Bergmann and Otfried G¨ uhne,Entanglement cri- teria for Dicke states,J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.46, 385304 (2013), arXiv:1305.2818

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  59. [59]

    G´ eza T´ oth and Otfried G¨ uhne,Entanglement and Per- mutational Symmetry,Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 170503 (2009), arXiv:0812.4453

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  60. [60]

    Marius Paraschiv, Nikolai Miklin, Tobias Moroder, and Otfried G¨ uhne,Proving genuine multiparticle entangle- ment from separable nearest-neighbor marginals,Phys. Rev. A98, 062102 (2018), arXiv:1705.02696

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  61. [61]

    Lanyon,Gen- eration of multipartite photonic entanglement using a trapped-ion quantum processing node,arXiv:2510.15693 (2025)

    Marco Canteri, James Bate, Ida Mishra, Nicolai Friis, Victor Krutyanskiy, and Benjamin P. Lanyon,Gen- eration of multipartite photonic entanglement using a trapped-ion quantum processing node,arXiv:2510.15693 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    The entropy vector formalism and the structure of multidimensional entanglement in multipartite systems

    Marcus Huber, Mart´ ı Perarnau-Llobet, and Julio I. de Vicente,The entropy vector formalism and the structure of multidimensional entanglement in multi- partite systems,Phys. Rev. A88, 042328 (2013), arXiv:1307.3541

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  63. [63]

    Shuheng Liu, Qiongyi He, Marcus Huber, and Giuseppe Vitagliano,Characterizing high-dimensional multipartite entanglement beyond Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger fideli- ties,Quantum10, 1995 (2026), arXiv:2405.03261

    work page arXiv 1995

  64. [64]

    Jan Provazn´ ık,witnessmess,https://github.com/ jan-provaznik/witnessmess

  65. [65]

    Evgeny Shchukin and Peter van Loock,General- ized conditions for genuine multipartite continuous- variable entanglement,Phys. Rev. A92, 042328 (2015), arXiv:1503.05001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  66. [66]

    Systematic Construction of Genuine Multipartite Entanglement Criteria using Uncertainty Relations

    Fabricio Toscano, A. Saboia, Ardiley T. Avelar, and Stephen Patrick Walborn,Systematic construc- tion of genuine-multipartite-entanglement criteria in continuous-variable systems using uncertainty relations, Phys. Rev. A92, 052316 (2015), arXiv:1407.7248

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  67. [67]

    Evgeny Shchukin and Peter van Loock,Tripartite separa- bility conditions exponentially violated by gaussian states, Phys. Rev. A90, 012334 (2014), arXiv:1402.1701

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  68. [68]

    Da Zhang, David Barral, Yanpeng Zhang, Min Xiao, and Kamel Bencheikh,Genuine Tripartite Non-Gaussian Entanglement,Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 093602 (2023), arXiv:2205.11940

    work page arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    Henning Vahlbruch, Moritz Mehmet, Karsten Danz- mann, and Roman Schnabel,Detection of 15 db squeezed states of light and their application for the absolute cal- ibration of photoelectric quantum efficiency,Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 110801 (2016)

    2016

  70. [70]

    Henry Teicher,On the Mixture of Distributions,Ann. Math. Statist.31, 55–73 (1960)

    1960

  71. [71]

    Henry Teicher,Identifiability of Finite Mixtures,Ann. Math. Statist.34, 1265–1269 (1963)

    1963

  72. [72]

    Ultra-Large-Scale Continuous-Variable Cluster States Multiplexed in the Time Domain

    Shota Yokoyama, Ryuji Ukai, Seiji C. Armstrong, Chanond Sornphiphatphong, Toshiyuki Kaji, Shigenari Suzuki, Jun-ichi Yoshikawa, Hidehiro Yonezawa, Nico- las C. Menicucci, and Akira Furusawa,Ultra-large-scale continuous-variable cluster states multiplexed in the time 12 domain,Nat. Photonics7, 982 (2013), arXiv:1306.3366

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  73. [73]

    Experimental realization of multipartite entanglement of 60 modes of a quantum optical frequency comb

    Moran Chen, Nicolas C. Menicucci, and Olivier Pfister, Experimental Realization of Multipartite Entanglement of 60 Modes of a Quantum Optical Frequency Comb, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 120505 (2014), arXiv:1311.2957

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  74. [74]

    Stefan Gerke, Jan Sperling, Werner Vogel, Yin Cai, Jonathan Roslund, Nicolas Treps, and Claude Fabre,Full Multipartite Entanglement of Frequency- Comb Gaussian States,Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 050501 (2015), arXiv:1409.5692

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  75. [75]

    Jun-ichi Yoshikawa, Shota Yokoyama, Toshiyuki Kaji, Chanond Sornphiphatphong, Yu Shiozawa, Kenzo Makino, and Akira Furusawa,Invited article: Gen- eration of one-million-mode continuous-variable cluster state by unlimited time-domain multiplexing,APL Pho- tonics1(2016), arXiv:1606.06688

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  76. [76]

    MOSEK ApS,MOSEK Optimizer API for Python 11.2.0 (2026)

    2026

  77. [77]

    Harris, K

    Charles R. Harris, K. Jarrod Millman, St´ efan J. van der Walt, Ralf Gommers, Pauli Virtanen, David Cour- napeau, Eric Wieser, Julian Taylor, Sebastian Berg, Nathaniel J. Smith, Robert Kern, Matti Picus, Stephan Hoyer, Marten H. van Kerkwijk, Matthew Brett, Al- lan Haldane, Jaime Fern´ andez del R´ ıo, Mark Wiebe, Pearu Peterson, Pierre G´ erard-Marchant,...

    2020

  78. [78]

    Oliphant, Matt Haberland, Tyler Reddy, David Cournapeau, Evgeni Burovski, Pearu Peterson, Warren Weckesser, Jonathan Bright, St´ efan J

    Pauli Virtanen, Ralf Gommers, Travis E. Oliphant, Matt Haberland, Tyler Reddy, David Cournapeau, Evgeni Burovski, Pearu Peterson, Warren Weckesser, Jonathan Bright, St´ efan J. van der Walt, Matthew Brett, Joshua Wilson, K. Jarrod Millman, Nikolay Mayorov, Andrew R. J. Nelson, Eric Jones, Robert Kern, Eric Larson, C J Carey, ˙Ilhan Polat, Yu Feng, Eric W....

    2020

  79. [79]

    Fang,mpi4py: Sta- tus update after 12 years of development,Computing in Science & Engineering23, 47 (2021)

    Lisandro Dalcin and Yao-Lung L. Fang,mpi4py: Sta- tus update after 12 years of development,Computing in Science & Engineering23, 47 (2021)

    2021

  80. [80]

    Guillaume Sagnol and Maximilian Stahlberg,PICOS: A Python interface to conic optimization solvers,Journal of Open Source Software7, 3915 (2022)

    2022

Showing first 80 references.