pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.28993 · v1 · pith:EOWKKUULnew · submitted 2026-05-27 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Reinterpreting Memory Effects in Nonequilibrium Systems: From Temporal Dynamics to Steady-State Signatures via NEGF

Pragya Chaudhary This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 10:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords memory effectsnon-Markovian dynamicsNEGFself-energyspectral functionnonequilibrium transportelectron-phonon coupling2D lattice systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Static disorder produces local self-energies and Markovian memory kernels while electron-phonon coupling produces nonlocal self-energies and non-Markovian behavior in nonequilibrium 2D systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper starts from a 2D tight-binding Hamiltonian and uses the Dyson expansion on the Keldysh contour together with second-order Born and self-consistent Born approximations to obtain electronic self-energies for elastic and inelastic scattering. Static disorder yields a local self-energy whose memory kernel decays rapidly, the signature of Markovian dynamics. Electron-phonon coupling instead produces temporally nonlocal self-energies that retain genuine non-Markovian character. These contrasting kernels appear directly in the spectral function, which the authors therefore propose as a steady-state diagnostic of memory effects. The same framework is then applied to Hofstadter and RKKY-coupled models, and 1PI and 2PI effective actions are examined for their coarse-graining behavior.

Core claim

Within the Schwinger-Keldysh NEGF formalism, the self-energy arising from static disorder is spatially local and generates a memory kernel that decays on short time scales, corresponding to Markovian dynamics, whereas the self-energy arising from electron-phonon coupling is temporally nonlocal and sustains non-Markovian memory; both signatures are encoded in the spectral function.

What carries the argument

The electronic self-energy obtained from the Dyson equation on the Keldysh contour under Born approximations, which directly determines the form and decay of the memory kernel.

If this is right

  • The spectral function supplies a practical, steady-state observable for distinguishing Markovian from non-Markovian memory effects without requiring explicit time-resolved measurements.
  • Application of the same NEGF treatment to the Hofstadter model and to RKKY-coupled systems shows that the choice of microscopic Hamiltonian controls whether the resulting dynamics remain Markovian or become non-Markovian.
  • Examination of 1PI and 2PI effective actions reveals how coarse-graining alters the memory content of the theory.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the spectral-function distinction survives beyond the Born level, it could be used to identify dominant scattering mechanisms in mesoscopic devices from equilibrium or steady-state spectroscopy alone.
  • The separation between local and nonlocal self-energies suggests that hybrid disorder-plus-phonon models would produce memory kernels whose long-time tail is controlled by the phonon component.

Load-bearing premise

The second-order Born and self-consistent Born approximations are sufficient to reveal the qualitative difference between Markovian and non-Markovian memory kernels for the elastic and inelastic mechanisms examined.

What would settle it

A numerical or experimental spectral function computed or measured for a 2D lattice with static disorder that fails to differ from the corresponding function obtained with electron-phonon coupling under the same Born approximations would falsify the claimed distinction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28993 by Pragya Chaudhary.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Decaying nature corresponds to the elastic scattering [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Oscillatory nature corresponds to inelastic Born ap [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Lowest-order (Born) self-energy diagram for electron– [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Heatmap comparison of the inelastic self-energy memory kernel within the Born approximation and self-consistent Born [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Transmission T(E) versus effective scattering [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Flowchart to explain NEGF methodology [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate memory effects and quantum transport in two-dimensional lattice systems within the framework of non-equilibrium Green's functions and Schwinger-Keldysh non-equilibrium quantum field theory. Starting from a 2D tight-binding Hamiltonian, we employ the Dyson expansion on the Keldysh contour and the second-order Born and self-consistent Born Approximation to derive the electronic self-energies associated with elastic and inelastic scattering mechanisms.Static disorder produces a local self-energy and a rapidly decaying memory kernel, characteristic of Markovian dynamics, whereas electron-phonon coupling generates temporally nonlocal self-energies and genuine Non-Markovian behavior. We demonstrate that these distinct memory signatures are directly reflected in the spectral function, which we propose as a diagnostic probe of non-equilibrium memory effects. Further we explore 1PI and 2PI effective actions to see their memory perspectives studying their coarse-graining behavior. Building on this theoretical framework, we further apply the conventional NEGF formalism to two paradigmatic two-dimensional models-the Hofstadter and an RKKY-coupled system to explore how different microscopic Hamiltonians influence Markovian and Non-Markovian nature. Our results provide a unified connection between scattering mechanisms, memory effects, and quantum transport in low-dimensional systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses the NEGF formalism on the Schwinger-Keldysh contour, starting from a 2D tight-binding Hamiltonian, to derive electronic self-energies via Dyson expansion and second-order Born/self-consistent Born approximations. It claims that static disorder yields a local self-energy with rapidly decaying memory kernel (Markovian), while electron-phonon coupling produces temporally nonlocal self-energies (non-Markovian); these signatures appear in the steady-state spectral function, proposed as a diagnostic for nonequilibrium memory effects. The work further examines 1PI and 2PI effective actions, their coarse-graining, and applies the framework to Hofstadter and RKKY-coupled models to illustrate how microscopic Hamiltonians affect Markovian versus non-Markovian character.

Significance. If the claimed qualitative separation of memory kernels survives beyond the chosen truncation, the spectral-function diagnostic would provide a concrete, experimentally accessible link between scattering mechanisms and non-Markovian dynamics in low-dimensional nonequilibrium transport. The explicit application to Hofstadter and RKKY models supplies falsifiable predictions for specific Hamiltonians, which strengthens the framework's utility if the underlying approximations are shown to be robust.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Dyson expansion/Born approximations paragraph] Abstract and paragraph on Dyson expansion/Born approximations: the central claim that static disorder produces a strictly local, rapidly decaying kernel while electron-phonon coupling remains temporally nonlocal rests on the second-order Born and self-consistent Born truncations. No comparisons to numerically exact solvers (e.g., hierarchical equations of motion or exact diagonalization on small clusters) or higher-order diagrammatic resummations are reported; higher-order scattering or vertex corrections could generate effective time-nonlocality even for elastic disorder, undermining the proposed spectral-function diagnostic.
  2. [Spectral function discussion] Section discussing the spectral function as diagnostic: the assertion that memory-kernel signatures are 'directly reflected' in the steady-state spectral function is presented without an explicit mapping (e.g., relating kernel decay time to linewidth or sideband structure) that is independent of the same self-energy expressions used to define the memory; this leaves open the possibility of circularity between the definition of 'memory' and the calculated observable.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Methods section] Notation for the Keldysh contour components and the precise definition of the memory kernel (e.g., whether it is the full lesser/greater component or a projected quantity) should be stated explicitly in the methods section to allow direct reproduction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and paragraph on Dyson expansion/Born approximations: the central claim that static disorder produces a strictly local, rapidly decaying kernel while electron-phonon coupling remains temporally nonlocal rests on the second-order Born and self-consistent Born truncations. No comparisons to numerically exact solvers (e.g., hierarchical equations of motion or exact diagonalization on small clusters) or higher-order diagrammatic resummations are reported; higher-order scattering or vertex corrections could generate effective time-nonlocality even for elastic disorder, undermining the proposed spectral-function diagnostic.

    Authors: We agree that the reported distinction is obtained within the second-order Born and SCBA approximations. These truncations are standard for weak-to-intermediate scattering strengths in NEGF and correctly capture the instantaneous nature of elastic disorder versus the retarded phonon-mediated interaction. We acknowledge that higher-order diagrams or vertex corrections could in principle introduce effective nonlocality for disorder scattering. We will add a new paragraph in the methods and discussion sections explicitly stating the approximation level, its validity regime, and the possibility that non-perturbative effects might alter the Markovian character, thereby qualifying the proposed diagnostic. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Section discussing the spectral function as diagnostic: the assertion that memory-kernel signatures are 'directly reflected' in the steady-state spectral function is presented without an explicit mapping (e.g., relating kernel decay time to linewidth or sideband structure) that is independent of the same self-energy expressions used to define the memory; this leaves open the possibility of circularity between the definition of 'memory' and the calculated observable.

    Authors: The memory kernel is the time-domain self-energy Σ(t,t′) obtained from the Born diagrams; its Fourier transform enters the Dyson equation that yields the retarded Green’s function and hence the spectral function A(ω). Rapid temporal decay produces a nearly frequency-independent imaginary part of Σ^R(ω) (uniform broadening), while slow or oscillatory decay produces frequency-dependent structure (sidebands). This is the standard NEGF relation between time and frequency domains and is not circular. To remove any ambiguity we will insert an explicit subsection that derives the mapping analytically for model kernels (exponential decay versus damped oscillation) and shows the resulting linewidth versus sideband signatures. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • We do not perform comparisons against numerically exact solvers (HEOM, exact diagonalization) in the present work; providing such benchmarks would require new, extensive calculations outside the scope of the manuscript.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Memory kernel locality and spectral signatures reduce to the same NEGF self-energy definitions by construction

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract]
    "Static disorder produces a local self-energy and a rapidly decaying memory kernel, characteristic of Markovian dynamics, whereas electron-phonon coupling generates temporally nonlocal self-energies and genuine Non-Markovian behavior. We demonstrate that these distinct memory signatures are directly reflected in the spectral function, which we propose as a diagnostic probe of non-equilibrium memory effects."

    The memory kernel is identified with the time dependence of the self-energy Σ(t,t'); locality in time is therefore the definition of Markovian dynamics. The spectral function A(ω) = −(1/π)Im G^R(ω) is computed from the retarded Green's function that solves the Dyson equation with precisely that Σ. The claimed reflection therefore follows identically from the input expressions rather than constituting an independent result.

full rationale

The central claim equates the time-locality of the self-energy (derived under Born approximations) with Markovian vs non-Markovian memory and then states that these signatures appear in the spectral function. Because the spectral function is obtained directly from the Green's function via the Dyson equation that incorporates the identical self-energy, the demonstration is tautological within the chosen framework. No external benchmark or independent observable is invoked to break the definitional loop. No self-citations, fitted predictions, or ansatz smuggling appear in the abstract or described chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; full text unavailable. The ledger therefore records only the explicit methodological choices named in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Second-order Born and self-consistent Born approximations suffice to derive self-energies for elastic and inelastic scattering
    Abstract states these approximations are employed to obtain the self-energies.
  • standard math Schwinger-Keldysh contour and Dyson expansion on that contour correctly describe the non-equilibrium dynamics
    Framework invoked at the start of the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5745 in / 1552 out tokens · 33609 ms · 2026-06-29T10:03:24.577743+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    World Scientific, 2009

    Felix A Buot.Nonequilibrium quantum transport physics in nanosystems: foundation of computational nonequilib- rium physics in nanoscience and nanotechnology. World Scientific, 2009. 11

    2009

  2. [2]

    Cambridge University Press, 2005

    Supriyo Datta.Quantum Transport: Atom to Transistor. Cambridge University Press, 2005

    2005

  3. [3]

    Dynamics of open quantum systems ii, markovian approximation.Quantum, 6:616, 2022

    Marco Merkli. Dynamics of open quantum systems ii, markovian approximation.Quantum, 6:616, 2022

    2022

  4. [5]

    Quantum non- markovianity: Overview and recent developments.Fron- tiers in Quantum Science and Technology, 2:1134583, 2023

    U Shrikant and Prabha Mandayam. Quantum non- markovianity: Overview and recent developments.Fron- tiers in Quantum Science and Technology, 2:1134583, 2023

    2023

  5. [6]

    Introduction to nonequilibrium quantum field theory

    J¨ urgen Berges. Introduction to nonequilibrium quantum field theory. InAIP Conference Proceedings, volume 739, page 3–62. AIP, 2004. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10. 1063/1.1843591,doi:10.1063/1.1843591

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1843591 2004

  6. [7]

    Dicke model and the theory of driven and spontaneous emission.La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento (1978-1999), 9(4):1–85, 1986

    C Leonardi, Franco Persico, and G Vetri. Dicke model and the theory of driven and spontaneous emission.La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento (1978-1999), 9(4):1–85, 1986

    1978

  7. [8]

    Cambridge University Press, 2023

    Alex Kamenev.Field theory of non-equilibrium systems. Cambridge University Press, 2023

    2023

  8. [9]

    Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems.Reports on Progress in Physics, 79(9):096001, 2016

    Lukas M Sieberer, Michael Buchhold, and Sebastian Diehl. Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems.Reports on Progress in Physics, 79(9):096001, 2016

    2016

  9. [10]

    Haug and Antti-Pekka Jauho

    H. Haug and Antti-Pekka Jauho. Quantum kinetics in transport & optics of semiconductors.Quantum Kinet- ics in Transport and Optics of Semiconductors: , Solid- State Sciences, Volume 123. ISBN 978-3-540-73561-8. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2008, 123, 01 2008. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73564-9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73564-9 2008

  10. [11]

    Brownian motion of a quantum os- cillator.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 2(3):407–432, 1961

    Julian Schwinger. Brownian motion of a quantum os- cillator.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 2(3):407–432, 1961

    1961

  11. [12]

    Diagram technique for nonequilib- rium processes

    Leonid V Keldysh. Diagram technique for nonequilib- rium processes. InSelected Papers of Leonid V Keldysh, pages 47–55. World Scientific, 2024

    2024

  12. [13]

    CRC Press, 2018

    Leo P Kadanoff.Quantum statistical mechanics. CRC Press, 2018

    2018

  13. [14]

    Non-markovian electron-phonon relax- ation.Condens

    VG Morozov. Non-markovian electron-phonon relax- ation.Condens. Matter Phys, 3:577–595, 2000

    2000

  14. [15]

    P. Kaer, T. R. Nielsen, P. Lodahl, A.-P. Jauho, and J. Mørk. Non-markovian model of photon-assisted dephasing by electron-phonon interactions in a cou- pled quantum-dot–cavity system.Phys. Rev. Lett., 104:157401, Apr 2010. URL:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.157401,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.104.157401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.157401 2010

  15. [16]

    Energy dissipa- tion and decoherence in solid-state quantum devices: Markovian versus non-markovian treatments.Entropy, 22(4):489, 2020

    Rita Claudia Iotti and Fausto Rossi. Energy dissipa- tion and decoherence in solid-state quantum devices: Markovian versus non-markovian treatments.Entropy, 22(4):489, 2020

    2020

  16. [17]

    A semiclassical nonequilibrium green’s function approach to electron transport in systems exhibiting electron-phonon couplings.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.23620, 2025

    Maicol A Ochoa. A semiclassical nonequilibrium green’s function approach to electron transport in systems exhibiting electron-phonon couplings.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.23620, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [18]

    Dy- namical emergence of markovianity in local time scheme

    J Jekni´ c-Dugi´ c, Momir Arsenijevi´ c, and M Dugi´ c. Dy- namical emergence of markovianity in local time scheme. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Phys- ical and Engineering Sciences, 472(2190), 2016

    2016

  18. [19]

    01 2015.doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24121-0

    Michael Bonitz.Quantum kinetic theory, second edition. 01 2015.doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24121-0

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24121-0 2015

  19. [20]

    Cambridge University Press, 2013

    Gianluca Stefanucci and Robert Van Leeuwen.Nonequi- librium many-body theory of quantum systems: a modern introduction. Cambridge University Press, 2013

    2013

  20. [21]

    General non- markovian dynamics of open quantum systems.Phys

    Wei-Min Zhang, Ping-Yuan Lo, Heng-Na Xiong, Ma- tisse Wei-Yuan Tu, and Franco Nori. General non- markovian dynamics of open quantum systems.Phys. Rev. Lett., 109:170402, Oct 2012. URL:https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.170402,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.170402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.170402 2012

  21. [22]

    Colloquium: Non-markovian dynam- ics in open quantum systems.Reviews of Modern Physics, 88(2):021002, 2016

    Heinz-Peter Breuer, Elsi-Mari Laine, Jyrki Piilo, and Bassano Vacchini. Colloquium: Non-markovian dynam- ics in open quantum systems.Reviews of Modern Physics, 88(2):021002, 2016

    2016

  22. [23]

    Dynamics of non- markovian open quantum systems.Reviews of Modern Physics, 89(1):015001, 2017

    In´ es De Vega and Daniel Alonso. Dynamics of non- markovian open quantum systems.Reviews of Modern Physics, 89(1):015001, 2017

    2017

  23. [24]

    Generalized quan- tum master equation from memory kernel coupling the- ory.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 2026

    Rui-Hao Bi, Wei Liu, and Wenjie Dou. Generalized quan- tum master equation from memory kernel coupling the- ory.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 2026

    2026

  24. [25]

    A review of modeling interacting transient phenomena with non-equilibrium green functions.Reports on Progress in Physics, 82, 03 2019.doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aafe5f

    Mark Hirsbrunner, Timothy Philicelli, Bora Basa, Youngseok Kim, Moon Park, and Matthew Gilbert. A review of modeling interacting transient phenomena with non-equilibrium green functions.Reports on Progress in Physics, 82, 03 2019.doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aafe5f

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aafe5f 2019

  25. [26]

    Non-markovian dynam- ics of a two-level system in a bosonic bath and a gaus- sian fluctuating environment with finite correlation time

    VA Mikhailov and NV Troshkin. Non-markovian dynam- ics of a two-level system in a bosonic bath and a gaus- sian fluctuating environment with finite correlation time. Physical Review A, 103(1):012208, 2021

    2021

  26. [27]

    Uni- fied framework for open quantum dynamics with mem- ory.Nature Communications, 15(1):8087, 2024

    Felix Ivander, Lachlan P Lindoy, and Joonho Lee. Uni- fied framework for open quantum dynamics with mem- ory.Nature Communications, 15(1):8087, 2024

    2024

  27. [28]

    Spectral signatures of the markovian to non-markovian transition in open quantum systems.APL quantum, 2(2), 2025

    Zeng-Zhao Li, Chi-Hang Lam, Cho-Tung Yip, and Bo Li. Spectral signatures of the markovian to non-markovian transition in open quantum systems.APL quantum, 2(2), 2025

    2025

  28. [29]

    Quantifying spectral signatures of non-markovianity be- yond the born-redfield master equation.Quantum, 9:1863, 2025

    Andrew Keefe, Nishant Agarwal, and Archana Kamal. Quantifying spectral signatures of non-markovianity be- yond the born-redfield master equation.Quantum, 9:1863, 2025

    2025

  29. [30]

    Time- dependent markovian quantum master equation.Physi- cal Review A, 98(5):052129, 2018

    Roie Dann, Amikam Levy, and Ronnie Kosloff. Time- dependent markovian quantum master equation.Physi- cal Review A, 98(5):052129, 2018

    2018

  30. [31]

    Non-markovian decoherence dynamics of strong-coupling hybrid quan- tum systems: A master equation approach.Physical Re- view A, 103(1):013714, 2021

    Kai-Ting Chiang and Wei-Min Zhang. Non-markovian decoherence dynamics of strong-coupling hybrid quan- tum systems: A master equation approach.Physical Re- view A, 103(1):013714, 2021

    2021

  31. [32]

    Spectral theory of non-markovian dissipative phase tran- sitions.Physical Review A, 110(4):042201, 2024

    Baptiste Debecker, John Martin, and Fran¸ cois Damanet. Spectral theory of non-markovian dissipative phase tran- sitions.Physical Review A, 110(4):042201, 2024

    2024

  32. [33]

    Non-markovian theories based on a decomposition of the spectral density.The Journal of chemical physics, 121(6):2505–2514, 2004

    Ulrich Kleinekath¨ ofer. Non-markovian theories based on a decomposition of the spectral density.The Journal of chemical physics, 121(6):2505–2514, 2004

    2004

  33. [34]

    Springer Sci- ence & Business Media, 2013

    Gerald D Mahan.Many-particle physics. Springer Sci- ence & Business Media, 2013

    2013

  34. [35]

    Quantum field theory of non- equilibrium states, cambridge university press.New York, 2007

    Jørgen Rammer. Quantum field theory of non- equilibrium states, cambridge university press.New York, 2007

    2007

  35. [36]

    OUP Oxford, 2002

    Heinz-Peter Breuer and Francesco Petruccione.The the- ory of open quantum systems. OUP Oxford, 2002

    2002

  36. [37]

    Ultrafast dynamics of strongly correlated fermions—nonequilibrium green functions and selfenergy approximations.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 32(10):103001, 2020

    Niclas Schl¨ unzen, Sebastian Hermanns, Miriam Scharnke, and Michael Bonitz. Ultrafast dynamics of strongly correlated fermions—nonequilibrium green functions and selfenergy approximations.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 32(10):103001, 2020

    2020

  37. [38]

    Exam- ining electron-boson coupling using time-resolved spec- troscopy.Physical Review X, 12 2012.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevX.3.041033

    Michael Sentef, Alexander Kemper, Brian Moritz, James 12 Freericks, Zhi-Xun Shen, and Thomas Devereaux. Exam- ining electron-boson coupling using time-resolved spec- troscopy.Physical Review X, 12 2012.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevX.3.041033

    2012

  38. [39]

    Nonequilibrium dy- namical mean-field calculations based on the noncrossing approximation and its generalizations.Physical Review B, 82(11), September 2010

    Martin Eckstein and Philipp Werner. Nonequilibrium dy- namical mean-field calculations based on the noncrossing approximation and its generalizations.Physical Review B, 82(11), September 2010. URL:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.115115,doi:10.1103/physrevb. 82.115115

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.115115 2010

  39. [40]

    Wingreen

    Yigal Meir and Ned S. Wingreen. Landauer for- mula for the current through an interacting elec- tron region.Phys. Rev. Lett., 68:2512–2515, Apr

  40. [41]

    URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.68.2512,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.68. 2512

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68

  41. [42]

    The non-equilibrium green function (negf) method

    Kerem C ¸ amsarı, Shuvro Chowdhury, and Supriyo Datta. The non-equilibrium green function (negf) method. 08 2020.doi:10.48550/arXiv.2008.01275

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.01275 2020

  42. [43]

    Control of noisy quantum systems: Field theory approach to error mitigation

    Rafael Hipolito and Paul Goldbart. Control of noisy quantum systems: Field theory approach to error mit- igation, 12 2015.doi:10.48550/arXiv.1512.05477

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.05477 2015

  43. [44]

    Quantum theory of nonequilib- rium processes, i.Annals of Physics, 152(2):239– 304, 1984

    P Danielewicz. Quantum theory of nonequilib- rium processes, i.Annals of Physics, 152(2):239– 304, 1984. URL:https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/0003491684900927,doi:10. 1016/0003-4916(84)90092-7

    work page arXiv 1984

  44. [45]

    Roussel, A

    Arend G. Dijkstra and Yoshitaka Tanimura. Non- markovian entanglement dynamics in the presence of system-bath coherence.Phys. Rev. Lett., 104:250401, Jun 2010. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.104.250401,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 104.250401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2010

  45. [46]

    Adaptive numerical solution of kadanoff-baym equations.SciPost Physics Core, 5(2):030, 2022

    Francisco Meirinhos, Michael Kajan, Johann Kroha, and Tim Bode. Adaptive numerical solution of kadanoff-baym equations.SciPost Physics Core, 5(2):030, 2022

    2022

  46. [47]

    An Introduction to the Nonperturbative Renormalization Group

    Bertrand Delamotte. An Introduction to the nonper- turbative renormalization group.Lect. Notes Phys., 852:49–132, 2012.arXiv:cond-mat/0702365,doi:10. 1007/978-3-642-27320-9_2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  47. [48]

    Non-markovian out-of-equilibrium dynamics: A general numerical procedure to construct time-dependent memory kernels for coarse-grained observables,

    Hugues Meyer, Philipp Pelagejcev, and Tanja Schilling. Non-markovian out-of-equilibrium dynamics: A general numerical procedure to construct time-dependent memory kernels for coarse-grained observables,

  48. [49]

    URL:https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11753, arXiv:1905.11753

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1905

  49. [50]

    A tutorial on the negf method for electron transport in devices and defec- tive materials.The European Physical Journal B, 96, 08 2023.doi:10.1140/epjb/s10051-023-00580-5

    Akansha Thakur and Niladri Sarkar. A tutorial on the negf method for electron transport in devices and defec- tive materials.The European Physical Journal B, 96, 08 2023.doi:10.1140/epjb/s10051-023-00580-5

    work page doi:10.1140/epjb/s10051-023-00580-5 2023

  50. [51]

    Cambridge Studies in Semiconductor Physics and Microelectronic Engineering

    Supriyo Datta.Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Sys- tems. Cambridge Studies in Semiconductor Physics and Microelectronic Engineering. Cambridge University Press, 1995

    1995

  51. [52]

    Quantum transport with spin dephasing: A nonequlibrium green’s function approach.Phys

    Ahmet Ali Yanik, Gerhard Klimeck, and Supriyo Datta. Quantum transport with spin dephasing: A nonequlibrium green’s function approach.Phys. Rev. B, 76:045213, Jul 2007. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.045213,doi:10.1103/PhysRevB. 76.045213

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.045213 2007

  52. [53]

    Deciphering or- bital and spin-resolved transmission spectra via the negf formalism.EPJ Web Conf., 356:01007, 2026.doi: 10.1051/epjconf/202635601007

    Chaudhary Pragya and Sarkar Niladri. Deciphering or- bital and spin-resolved transmission spectra via the negf formalism.EPJ Web Conf., 356:01007, 2026.doi: 10.1051/epjconf/202635601007

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/202635601007 2026

  53. [54]

    Quantum simu- lation of hofstadter butterfly with synthetic gauge fields on two-dimensional superconducting-qubit lattices.Fron- tiers of Physics, 18(6):61302, 2023

    Wei Feng, Dexi Shao, Guo-Qiang Zhang, Qi-Ping Su, Jun-Xiang Zhang, and Chui-Ping Yang. Quantum simu- lation of hofstadter butterfly with synthetic gauge fields on two-dimensional superconducting-qubit lattices.Fron- tiers of Physics, 18(6):61302, 2023

    2023

  54. [55]

    Rkky in half-filled bipartite lattices: Graphene as an example.Phys

    Saeed Saremi. Rkky in half-filled bipartite lattices: Graphene as an example.Phys. Rev. B, 76:184430, Nov 2007. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.76.184430,doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.76. 184430

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.76 2007

  55. [56]

    Hofstadter

    Douglas R. Hofstadter. Energy levels and wave func- tions of bloch electrons in rational and irrational mag- netic fields.Phys. Rev. B, 14:2239–2249, 1976.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.14.2239

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.14.2239 1976

  56. [57]

    Functional renormalization group and 2pi effective action formalism.Annals of Physics, 431:168549, 2021

    Jean-Paul Blaizot, Jan M Pawlowski, and Urko Reinosa. Functional renormalization group and 2pi effective action formalism.Annals of Physics, 431:168549, 2021

    2021

  57. [58]

    Generic transport formula for a system driven by marko- vian reservoirs.Phys

    Tony Jin, Michele Filippone, and Thierry Giamarchi. Generic transport formula for a system driven by marko- vian reservoirs.Phys. Rev. B, 102:205131, Nov 2020. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB. 102.205131,doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.102.205131

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb 2020

  58. [59]

    Kalvov´ a

    Vaclav Spicka, Bedˇ rich Velick´ y, and A. Kalvov´ a. Re- lation between full negf, non-markovian and marko- vian transport equations.The European Physical Jour- nal Special Topics, 230, 04 2021.doi:10.1140/epjs/ s11734-021-00109-w. VIII. APPENDIX (A) A. construction of Kadanoff-Baym equation Begin from the exact operator identity on the Keldysh contour[5...

    work page doi:10.1140/epjs/ 2021

  59. [60]

    Second-Order Expansion The lowest non-vanishing contribution from the inter- action arises at second order ing q (Born approximation), exp −i Z C dt Hinel(t) ≈1− 1 2 Z C dt3dt4 TCHinel(t3)Hinel(t4).(86) Substituting this into the definition ofG(1,2) yields the second-order correction δG(1,2) = (−i) 2 Z C dt3dt4 D TC ψ(1)ψ †(2) Hinel(t3)Hinel(t4) E conn ,(...

  60. [61]

    Insertion of the Interaction Hamiltonian Inserting the explicit form ofH inel gives δG(1,2) = X q |gq|2 Z C dt3dt4 D TC ψ(1)ψ †(2) ψ†ψ(bq +b † q) t3 ψ†ψ(bq +b † q) t4 E .(88)

  61. [62]

    The phonon contraction yields the phonon Green’s function TC (bq +b † q)t3(bq +b † q)t4 =−i D q(3,4),(89) whereD q is the contour-ordered phonon propagator

    Wick Contractions Since the phonons are harmonic and the initial den- sity matrix factorizes into electronic and phononic parts, 14 Wick’s theorem applies separately to electrons and phonons. The phonon contraction yields the phonon Green’s function TC (bq +b † q)t3(bq +b † q)t4 =−i D q(3,4),(89) whereD q is the contour-ordered phonon propagator. The conn...

  62. [63]

    APPENDIX C A

    Identification of the Self-Energy Collecting all contributions, the second-order correc- tion to the Green’s function takes the form δG(1,2) = Z C d3d4G(1,3) Σ(3,4)G(4,2),(91) which allows us to identify the electron–phonon self- energy as Σ(3,4) =i X q |gq|2 G(3,4)D q(3,4).(92) X. APPENDIX C A. Coarse-graining and effective theories The renormalization g...