Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 41 references

Towards Reliable Agentic Progressive Text-to-Visualization with Verification Rules

T0 review · 1 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Progressive multi-turn interactions with a validation agent improve text-to-visualization accuracy over one-shot methods.

desk verdict The paper shifts text-to-vis to a multi-turn agent with verification rules and ships a new benchmark, but the gains look vulnerable to how that benchmark was built. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.29692 v1 pith:2AVHFB4J submitted 2026-05-28 cs.DB

Wenxin Xu , Chen Jason Zhang , Xiaoyong Wei , Haoyang Li , Hwanhee Kim , Yuanfeng Song , Raymond Chi-Wing Wong This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.DB
keywords text-to-visualizationprogressivemulti-turnagent-basedframeworkverificationrulesPMVisBenchexecutionaccuracymulti-agentsystemReAct-styleloop
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes shifting text-to-visualization from single-round queries to a progressive multi-turn process that lets users refine their intents step by step. It introduces PMVisBench, a dataset built by simplifying visualization query languages and reconstructing natural language queries under explicit rules so each intermediate step stays valid. PMVisAgent then deploys three specialized agents in a ReAct-style loop where a Validation Agent checks outputs and repairs errors to limit accumulation across turns. Experiments show this yields higher execution accuracy than existing baselines on both single-table and multi-table cases. The approach directly targets the cognitive overload that occurs when users must specify every visualization detail at once.

What carries the argument

The Validation Agent that performs verification and repair via a ReAct-style tool-use loop with explicit interaction and verification rules.

What would settle it

Running the same evaluation protocol on logs of actual non-expert users issuing iterative visualization requests and finding no accuracy gain or a drop relative to one-shot baselines.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

PMVisAgent, built on the progressive PMVis paradigm and the PMVisBench dataset, uses a User agent, a System agent, and a Validation Agent that applies verification and repair through a ReAct-style tool-use loop with explicit interaction and verification rules; this setup produces up to 17.57 percent and 23.21 percent gains in execution accuracy for single-table and multi-table settings respectively.

Load-bearing premise

The PMVisBench dataset, built through VQL simplification and NLQ reconstruction with explicit rule constraints, accurately captures the progressive and iterative nature of real-world user queries.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Users can refine visualization requirements across multiple turns instead of specifying everything upfront.
  • Verification rules keep every intermediate visualization query valid and meaningful.
  • Error accumulation is reduced by the validation agent's repair loop across dialogue rounds.
  • Both single-table and multi-table scenarios benefit from the combined progressive interaction and clarification steps.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The multi-agent verification pattern could transfer to other iterative generation tasks such as text-to-SQL or code synthesis.
  • The dataset construction method of rule-constrained simplification and reconstruction offers a template for building progressive benchmarks in additional domains.
  • Deployment in interactive data tools might allow non-experts to explore datasets through natural back-and-forth dialogue rather than precise single queries.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes PMVis, a progressive multi-turn paradigm for text-to-visualization that refines user intents iteratively, constructs PMVisBench as the first dataset for this setting via VQL simplification and NLQ reconstruction under explicit validity rule constraints, and introduces PMVisAgent, a multi-agent framework (User, System, Validation Agent) that uses a ReAct-style tool-use loop with verification and repair rules to mitigate error accumulation. Experiments on PMVisBench report that PMVisAgent outperforms state-of-the-art one-shot text-to-vis baselines by up to 17.57% and 23.21% execution accuracy in single-table and multi-table settings, with ablations confirming the value of progressive interaction plus clarification; code is released.

Significance. If the results hold under fair evaluation, the work is significant for shifting text-to-vis research from one-shot to realistic progressive interactions, providing the first benchmark capturing iterative query refinement, and demonstrating a reliable agentic architecture with explicit verification rules. The open-sourced code is a clear strength for reproducibility.

major comments (1)
  1. [PMVisBench construction] PMVisBench construction (abstract and dataset section): the process of simplifying existing VQLs and reconstructing NLQs under explicit rule constraints that keep every intermediate VQL valid risks systematically producing query sequences whose error patterns match exactly those targeted by the Validation Agent's repair rules. This raises the possibility that the reported 17.57%/23.21% gains reflect benchmark engineering rather than intrinsic superiority of the progressive + ReAct design over one-shot baselines.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the headline percentage improvements are stated without naming the baselines, reporting statistical significance, error bars, or the number of runs; the full experimental section should make these details explicit.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful review and for raising this important concern about potential benchmark construction artifacts. We address the comment directly below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [PMVisBench construction] PMVisBench construction (abstract and dataset section): the process of simplifying existing VQLs and reconstructing NLQs under explicit rule constraints that keep every intermediate VQL valid risks systematically producing query sequences whose error patterns match exactly those targeted by the Validation Agent's repair rules. This raises the possibility that the reported 17.57%/23.21% gains reflect benchmark engineering rather than intrinsic superiority of the progressive + ReAct design over one-shot baselines.

    Authors: The PMVisBench construction starts from real VQL queries drawn from existing datasets and applies simplification to derive multi-turn sequences. The explicit rule constraints are general VQL validity rules (schema compliance, valid column references, executable aggregations, etc.) whose sole purpose is to guarantee that every intermediate ground-truth VQL is meaningful and executable; they do not encode or inject particular error types. The Validation Agent’s ReAct-style verification and repair rules, by contrast, operate on the agent’s own reasoning trace and tool calls to detect and correct generation-time mistakes (e.g., incomplete intent, wrong tool parameters). These two rule sets address orthogonal concerns: one ensures benchmark ground truth is valid, the other mitigates error accumulation inside the agent loop. Because one-shot baselines are evaluated on the final NLQ alone, they receive no benefit from the progressive structure. Ablation results further isolate the contribution of progressive interaction and the validation component. We will add an explicit subsection clarifying the distinction between construction-time validity rules and agent-time repair rules. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's claims rest on empirical execution-accuracy gains of PMVisAgent versus baselines when evaluated on the newly constructed PMVisBench. Benchmark construction (VQL simplification + NLQ reconstruction under rule constraints) and the agent's ReAct-style verification rules are presented as separate design elements intended to model progressive queries; no equations, fitted parameters, or self-citation chains are shown that reduce the reported deltas to the inputs by construction. The evaluation is therefore self-contained against the stated baselines and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Towards Reliable Agentic Progressive Text-to-Visualization with Verification Rules." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2AVHFB4J

@misc{pith2026260529692,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Towards Reliable Agentic Progressive Text-to-Visualization with Verification Rules},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2AVHFB4J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.29692}
}
read the original abstract

Text-to-Visualization (Text-to-Vis) translates natural language queries into visualization query languages, enabling non-expert users to perform data analysis. However, most existing methods follow a one-shot paradigm that requires users to specify all visualization details in a single round, often leading to cognitive overload and incorrect visualizations. In this paper, we propose PMVis, a progressive multi-turn paradigm for text-to-vis, where users' intents are refined through multi-turn interactions. To support research in this paradigm, we construct PMVisBench, the first dataset designed to capture the progressive and iterative nature of real-world user queries. It is built through VQL simplification and NLQ reconstruction, with explicit rule constraints to ensure each intermediate VQL remains valid and meaningful. Building upon PMVis, we further introduce PMVisAgent, an agent-based framework that simulates realistic user-system dialogues. PMVisAgent consists of a User, a System, and a Validation Agent that performs verification and repair via a ReAct-style tool-use loop to mitigate error accumulation across rounds, with explicit interaction and verification rules to ensure reliability of the multi-agent system. Extensive experiments on PMVisBench demonstrate that PMVisAgent significantly outperforms state-of-the-art text-to-vis baselines. It achieves up to 17.57\% and 23.21\% improvements in execution accuracy in single-table and multi-table settings, respectively, while ablation studies confirm the importance of combining progressive interaction with clarification. The code is available at https://github.com/wxxv/PMVis.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.29692 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Pipeline of PMVisBench dataset construction. In the VQL Simplification step, original VQLs are parsed into clauses [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Dataset statistics of PMVisBench. (a) Distribution of samples across different chart types under four difficulty levels. (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The overall architecture of PMVisAgent. The pipeline simulates a progressive multi-turn text-to-vis workflow with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: An example of PMVisAgent workflow. This case shows how Validation Agent detects and repairs both schema errors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Synthesizing natural language to visualization (nl2vis) benchmarks from nl2sql benchmarks,

    Y . Luo, N. Tang, G. Li, C. Chai, W. Li, and X. Qin, “Synthesizing natural language to visualization (nl2vis) benchmarks from nl2sql benchmarks,” inProceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 2021, pp. 1235–1247

    2021

  2. [2]

    Aurora: Data-driven construction of visual graph query interfaces for graph databases,

    S. S. Bhowmick, K. Huang, H. E. Chua, Z. Yuan, B. Choi, and S. Zhou, “Aurora: Data-driven construction of visual graph query interfaces for graph databases,” inProceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGMOD Interna- tional Conference on Management of Data, 2020, pp. 2689–2692

    2020

  3. [3]

    Multivis-agent: A multi- agent framework with logic rules for reliable and comprehensive cross- modal data visualization,

    J. Lu, Y . Song, C. Zhang, and R. C.-W. Wong, “Multivis-agent: A multi- agent framework with logic rules for reliable and comprehensive cross- modal data visualization,” vol. 4, no. 1. ACM, feb 2026

    2026

  4. [4]

    Haichart: Human and ai paired visualization system,

    Y . Xie, Y . Luo, G. Li, and N. Tang, “Haichart: Human and ai paired visualization system,”Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 3178–3191, 2024

    2024

  5. [5]

    Navigating data repositories: Utilizing line charts to discover relevant datasets,

    D. Ji, H. Luo, Z. Bao, and S. Culpepper, “Navigating data repositories: Utilizing line charts to discover relevant datasets,”Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 4289–4292, 2024

    2024

  6. [6]

    Seedb: Efficient data-driven visualization recommendations to support visual analytics,

    M. Vartak, S. Rahman, S. Madden, A. Parameswaran, and N. Polyzotis, “Seedb: Efficient data-driven visualization recommendations to support visual analytics,” inProceedings of the VLDB Endowment International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, vol. 8, no. 13, 2015, p. 2182

    2015

  7. [7]

    Crowdchart: Crowdsourced data extraction from visualization charts,

    C. Chai, G. Li, J. Fan, and Y . Luo, “Crowdchart: Crowdsourced data extraction from visualization charts,”IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 3537–3549, 2020

    2020

  8. [8]

    Steerable self- driving data visualization,

    Y . Luo, X. Qin, C. Chai, N. Tang, G. Li, and W. Li, “Steerable self- driving data visualization,”IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 475–490, 2020

    2020

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Natural language interfaces for tabular data querying and visualization: A survey,

    W. Zhang, Y . Wang, Y . Song, V . J. Wei, Y . Tian, Y . Qi, J. H. Chan, R. C.- W. Wong, and H. Yang, “Natural language interfaces for tabular data querying and visualization: A survey,”IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 6699–6718, 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Visualization recommendation through visual relation learning and visual preference learning,

    D. Ji, H. Luo, and Z. Bao, “Visualization recommendation through visual relation learning and visual preference learning,” in2023 IEEE 39th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1860–1873

    2023

  3. [11]

    Towards robustness of text-to-visualization translation against lexical and phrasal variability,

    J. Lu, Y . Song, H. Zhang, C. J. Zhang, K. Wu, and R. C.-W. Wong, “Towards robustness of text-to-visualization translation against lexical and phrasal variability,” in2025 IEEE 41st International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE Computer Society, 2025, pp. 793–806

    2025

  4. [12]

    Datavist5: A pre-trained language model for jointly understanding text and data visualization,

    Z. Wan, Y . Song, S. Li, C. J. Zhang, and R. C.-W. Wong, “Datavist5: A pre-trained language model for jointly understanding text and data visualization,” in2025 IEEE 41st International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE, 2025, pp. 1704–1717

    2025

  5. [13]

    Vega- lite: A grammar of interactive graphics,

    A. Satyanarayan, D. Moritz, K. Wongsuphasawat, and J. Heer, “Vega- lite: A grammar of interactive graphics,”IEEE transactions on visual- ization and computer graphics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 341–350, 2016

    2016

  6. [14]

    ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis,

    R. A. M. Villanueva and Z. J. Chen, “ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis,” 2019

    2019

  7. [15]

    Natural language to visualization by neural machine translation,

    Y . Luo, N. Tang, G. Li, J. Tang, C. Chai, and X. Qin, “Natural language to visualization by neural machine translation,”IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 217–226, 2021

    2021

  8. [16]

    nvbench 2.0: Resolving ambiguity in text-to-visualization through stepwise reasoning,

    T. Luo, C. Huang, L. Shen, B. Li, S. Shen, W. Zeng, N. Tang, and Y . Luo, “nvbench 2.0: Resolving ambiguity in text-to-visualization through stepwise reasoning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.12880, 2025

    2025

  9. [17]

    Viseval: A benchmark for data visualization in the era of large language models,

    N. Chen, Y . Zhang, J. Xu, K. Ren, and Y . Yang, “Viseval: A benchmark for data visualization in the era of large language models,”IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2024

    2024

  10. [18]

    Interactive text-to- visualization: Refining visualization outputs through natural language user feedback,

    X. Xiong, R. C.-W. Wong, and Y . Song, “Interactive text-to- visualization: Refining visualization outputs through natural language user feedback,” inProceedings of the 34th ACM International Confer- ence on Information and Knowledge Management, 2025, pp. 3571–3581

    2025

  11. [19]

    Marrying dialogue systems with data visualization: Interactive data visualization generation from natural language conversations,

    Y . Song, X. Zhao, and R. C.-W. Wong, “Marrying dialogue systems with data visualization: Interactive data visualization generation from natural language conversations,” inProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2024, pp. 2733– 2744

    2024

  12. [20]

    Rgvisnet: A hybrid retrieval-generation neural framework towards automatic data visualiza- tion generation,

    Y . Song, X. Zhao, R. C.-W. Wong, and D. Jiang, “Rgvisnet: A hybrid retrieval-generation neural framework towards automatic data visualiza- tion generation,” inProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2022, pp. 1646–1655

    2022

  13. [21]

    Automated data visualization from natural language via large language models: An exploratory study,

    Y . Wu, Y . Wan, H. Zhang, Y . Sui, W. Wei, W. Zhao, G. Xu, and H. Jin, “Automated data visualization from natural language via large language models: An exploratory study,”Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–28, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    nvAgent: Automated data visualization from natural language via collaborative agent workflow,

    G. Ouyang, J. Chen, Z. Nie, Y . Gui, Y . Wan, H. Zhang, and D. Chen, “nvAgent: Automated data visualization from natural language via collaborative agent workflow,” inProceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers...

    2025

  15. [23]

    Automatic data visualization generation from chinese natural language questions,

    Y . Ge, V . J. Wei, Y . Song, J. C. Zhang, and R. C.-W. Wong, “Automatic data visualization generation from chinese natural language questions,” inProceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computa- tional Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COL...

    2024

  16. [24]

    Learning to recommend visualizations from data,

    X. Qian, R. A. Rossi, F. Du, S. Kim, E. Koh, S. Malik, T. Y . Lee, and J. Chan, “Learning to recommend visualizations from data,” inProceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery & data mining, 2021, pp. 1359–1369

    2021

  17. [25]

    Sevi: Speech-to- visualization through neural machine translation,

    J. Tang, Y . Luo, M. Ouzzani, G. Li, and H. Chen, “Sevi: Speech-to- visualization through neural machine translation,” inProceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 2022, pp. 2353–2356

    2022

  18. [26]

    Datatone: Managing ambiguity in natural language interfaces for data visual- ization,

    T. Gao, M. Dontcheva, E. Adar, Z. Liu, and K. G. Karahalios, “Datatone: Managing ambiguity in natural language interfaces for data visual- ization,” inProceedings of the 28th annual acm symposium on user interface software & technology, 2015, pp. 489–500

    2015

  19. [27]

    Applying pragmatics principles for interaction with visual analytics,

    E. Hoque, V . Setlur, M. Tory, and I. Dykeman, “Applying pragmatics principles for interaction with visual analytics,”IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 309–318, 2017. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, AUGUST 2021 14

    2017

  20. [28]

    Flowsense: A natural language interface for visual data exploration within a dataflow system,

    B. Yu and C. T. Silva, “Flowsense: A natural language interface for visual data exploration within a dataflow system,”IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2019

    2019

  21. [29]

    Data2vis: Automatic generation of data visualizations using sequence-to-sequence recurrent neural networks,

    V . Dibia and C ¸ . Demiralp, “Data2vis: Automatic generation of data visualizations using sequence-to-sequence recurrent neural networks,” IEEE computer graphics and applications, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 33–46, 2019

    2019

  22. [30]

    Chat2vis: Generating data visualizations via natural language using chatgpt, codex and gpt-3 large language models,

    P. Maddigan and T. Susnjak, “Chat2vis: Generating data visualizations via natural language using chatgpt, codex and gpt-3 large language models,”Ieee Access, vol. 11, pp. 45 181–45 193, 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    prompt4vis: prompting large language models with example mining for tabular data visualization,

    S. Li, X. Chen, Y . Song, Y . Song, C. J. Zhang, F. Hao, and L. Chen, “prompt4vis: prompting large language models with example mining for tabular data visualization,”The VLDB Journal, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1–26, 2025

    2025

  24. [32]

    The design and implementation of xiaoice, an empathetic social chatbot,

    L. Zhou, J. Gao, D. Li, and H.-Y . Shum, “The design and implementation of xiaoice, an empathetic social chatbot,”Computational Linguistics, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 53–93, 2020

    2020

  25. [33]

    Towards a human- like open-domain chatbot,

    D. Adiwardana, M.-T. Luong, D. R. So, J. Hall, N. Fiedel, R. Thoppilan, Z. Yang, A. Kulshreshtha, G. Nemade, Y . Luet al., “Towards a human- like open-domain chatbot,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.09977, 2020

    2001

  26. [34]

    Blenderbot 3: a deployed con- versational agent that continually learns to responsibly engage,

    K. Shuster, J. Xu, M. Komeili, D. Ju, E. M. Smith, S. Roller, M. Ung, M. Chen, K. Arora, J. Laneet al., “Blenderbot 3: a deployed con- versational agent that continually learns to responsibly engage,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.03188, 2022

    2022

  27. [35]

    Dialogue act recognition via crf-attentive structured network,

    Z. Chen, R. Yang, Z. Zhao, D. Cai, and X. He, “Dialogue act recognition via crf-attentive structured network,” inThe 41st international acm sigir conference on research & development in information retrieval, 2018, pp. 225–234

    2018

  28. [36]

    Recent advances and challenges in task-oriented dialog systems,

    Z. Zhang, R. Takanobu, Q. Zhu, M. Huang, and X. Zhu, “Recent advances and challenges in task-oriented dialog systems,”Science China Technological Sciences, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 2011–2027, 2020

    2011

  29. [37]

    Recent neural methods on dialogue state tracking for task-oriented dialogue systems: A survey,

    V . Balaraman, S. Sheikhalishahi, and B. Magnini, “Recent neural methods on dialogue state tracking for task-oriented dialogue systems: A survey,” inProceedings of the 22nd annual meeting of the special interest group on discourse and dialogue, 2021, pp. 239–251

    2021

  30. [38]

    End-to-end task-completion neural dialogue systems,

    X. Li, Y .-N. Chen, L. Li, J. Gao, and A. Celikyilmaz, “End-to-end task-completion neural dialogue systems,” inProceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), 2017, pp. 733–743

    2017

  31. [39]

    A network-based end-to-end trainable task-oriented dialogue system,

    T.-H. Wen, D. Vandyke, N. Mrk ˇsi´c, M. Gasic, L. M. R. Barahona, P.- H. Su, S. Ultes, and S. Young, “A network-based end-to-end trainable task-oriented dialogue system,” inProceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguist...

    2017

  32. [40]

    Ubar: Towards fully end-to-end task- oriented dialog system with gpt-2,

    Y . Yang, Y . Li, and X. Quan, “Ubar: Towards fully end-to-end task- oriented dialog system with gpt-2,” inProceedings of the AAAI confer- ence on artificial intelligence, vol. 35, no. 16, 2021, pp. 14 230–14 238

    2021

  33. [41]

    Attention is all you need,

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.