pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.00641 · v1 · pith:MTQQ6GFRnew · submitted 2026-05-30 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn · physics.comp-ph· physics.plasm-ph

Lattice Boltzmann Methods for Compressible (Magneto)hydrodynamics

Fedor Bukreev , Adrian Kummerl\"ander , Mathias J. Krause This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 18:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn physics.comp-phphysics.plasm-ph
keywords lattice boltzmann methodsmagnetohydrodynamicsstrang splittingcompressible flowskinetic methodsfluid structure interactionnumerical simulationmhd benchmarks
0
0 comments X

The pith

A lattice Boltzmann scheme decouples MHD transport into independent local operations via Strang splitting.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a class of lattice Boltzmann methods that solve coupled transport problems in magnetohydrodynamics by applying Strang splitting to conservation equations and then transporting each state variable separately using kinetic formulations. This produces fully local, decoupled operations that support high computational efficiency and scalability without additional coupling terms. The framework is applied to ideal compressible MHD and resistive incompressible MHD, which include the compressible Euler and incompressible Navier-Stokes limits. Demonstrations include benchmark validations at multiple resolutions and a simulation of a surface-resolved magnetized asteroid in supersonic solar wind flow that incorporates dynamic geometries and fluid-structure interaction.

Core claim

By exploiting the algorithmic structure of kinetic formulations to separately transport all state variables of Strang-splitted conservation equations alongside their characteristics, the authors obtain a novel class of LBM schemes that solve a wide range of transport equation systems through decoupled, fully local operations. The approach is shown to discretize ideal compressible and resistive incompressible MHD systems while reaching up to 98.9 percent of hardware roofline performance in a platform-transparent implementation.

What carries the argument

Strang splitting of conservation equations combined with independent kinetic transport of each state variable along its characteristics, which produces decoupled fully local operations.

If this is right

  • The scheme simulates both ideal compressible MHD and resistive incompressible MHD systems.
  • It recovers hydrodynamic limits including the compressible Euler and incompressible Navier-Stokes equations.
  • Implementation within a multi-physics framework reaches up to 98.9 percent of hardware roofline performance.
  • The method supports dynamic solid geometries, shifting magnetic fields, and fluid-structure interaction.
  • Validation succeeds against established incompressible and compressible MHD benchmarks at multiple resolutions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The fully local operations could reduce communication overhead in large-scale parallel simulations of MHD turbulence.
  • Similar splitting strategies might apply directly to other tightly coupled multiphysics systems such as reactive flows or plasma models.
  • The asteroid demonstration indicates the framework can handle moving boundaries and time-varying magnetic fields in a single consistent scheme.
  • Long-time conservation properties could be tested by extending the method to periodic or closed-domain MHD problems.

Load-bearing premise

Strang splitting followed by independent kinetic transport of each variable preserves the original coupled MHD physics without significant errors or extra coupling terms.

What would settle it

Compare results of the method on the Orszag-Tang vortex test case against a reference solution from a high-resolution finite-volume MHD code and check for differences in magnetic field structure or total energy conservation beyond numerical tolerance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.00641 by Adrian Kummerl\"ander, Fedor Bukreev, Mathias J. Krause.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Comparison of reference and simulated data for Brio-Wu benchmark at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Density and local Mach number distribution at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Behavior of magnetic field X at the x = 0.5 slice (top panel) and magnetic field Y in y = 0.5 slice (bottom) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Vorticity and electric current density by resolution of 2048 cells in the side length at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Electric current density j along the horizontal line at the height of y = π compared to the spectral simulation taken from [13]. The visual plots ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Density distribution in the adiabatic Orszag-Tang vortex benchmark by the resolution of 4000 cells in the side [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Validation of the gas pressure values along the horizontal lines at the heights of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Roofline analysis of both MHD dynamics on NVIDIA A5000 GPU. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Schematic overview of the 3D computational domain for simulating the interaction of an early solar wind [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Illustrative visualization and rendering [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The simulation of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flows presents a highly complex, tightly coupled transport problem that poses severe numerical and computational demands. Towards this, we propose a novel class of Lattice Boltzmann Methods (LBM) schemes capable of solving a wide range of transport equation systems with high computational efficiency and scalability. Our approach exploits the algorithmic structure of kinetic formulations to separately transport all state variables of Strang-splitted conservation equations alongside their characteristics, yielding decoupled, fully local operations. To demonstrate the capability of this framework on complex, numerically demanding multiphysics interactions, we apply it to these MHD flows. Specifically, we discretize ideal compressible and resistive incompressible MHD systems, which naturally encompass hydrodynamic limits such as the compressible Euler and incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Rigorous performance analysis of the implementation within the platform-transparent multi-physics framework OpenLB demonstrates up to 98.9\% of the hardware roofline. We validate our approach against established incompressible and compressible MHD benchmarks across multiple resolutions. Finally, we simulate a moving, surface-resolved magnetized asteroid modeled after 16 Psyche in a supersonic early solar wind flow. This showcases the framework's advanced support for dynamic solid geometries, shifting magnetic fields, and fluid-structure interaction.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a novel class of Lattice Boltzmann Methods for transport equation systems that uses Strang splitting of the conservation laws followed by independent, fully local kinetic transport of each state variable (density, momentum, energy, B) along its own characteristics. The framework is applied to ideal compressible MHD and resistive incompressible MHD (recovering Euler and Navier-Stokes limits), implemented in OpenLB with reported roofline performance up to 98.9%, validated on standard incompressible and compressible MHD benchmarks at multiple resolutions, and demonstrated on a 3D fluid-structure interaction problem involving a surface-resolved magnetized asteroid in supersonic solar wind.

Significance. If the decoupled Strang-split kinetic scheme accurately reproduces the cross-coupling terms (Lorentz force, induction) without additional operators, the approach would offer a computationally efficient and highly scalable route to large-scale MHD simulations, particularly those involving complex moving geometries. The explicit performance analysis and the dynamic-geometry demonstration are concrete strengths that would be of interest to the computational fluid dynamics community.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Discretization of MHD systems): The central claim that 'no additional coupling terms' are required rests on the assertion that independent streaming plus collision recovers the MHD cross terms (v·∇B, B·∇v, J×B). No a-priori truncation-error estimate for the Strang splitting applied to the induction and momentum equations is provided, nor is it shown how the collision operator restores the missing instantaneous couplings at the discrete level. This is load-bearing for the MHD claims because Alfvén-wave propagation and divergence preservation are sensitive to splitting lag.
  2. [§4.2] §4.2 (Validation benchmarks): While convergence against established MHD test cases is reported, the manuscript does not quantify the splitting-induced phase-speed or divergence errors (e.g., via a dedicated table of L2 errors versus splitting time-step size). Without this, it is difficult to assess whether the observed agreement is due to the kinetic formulation or to sufficiently small splitting steps.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 7] Figure 7 (asteroid simulation): the surface mesh resolution and the magnetic Reynolds number used in the run should be stated explicitly so that the fluid-structure interaction result can be reproduced.
  2. Notation: the symbol for the magnetic field is sometimes B and sometimes b; a single consistent symbol (and its units) should be used throughout.
  3. [§5] The performance roofline analysis in §5 would benefit from a brief statement of the arithmetic intensity assumed for the decoupled streaming step.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments. We address each major point below, indicating where revisions will be made to clarify the Strang-split kinetic scheme.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Discretization of MHD systems): The central claim that 'no additional coupling terms' are required rests on the assertion that independent streaming plus collision recovers the MHD cross terms (v·∇B, B·∇v, J×B). No a-priori truncation-error estimate for the Strang splitting applied to the induction and momentum equations is provided, nor is it shown how the collision operator restores the missing instantaneous couplings at the discrete level. This is load-bearing for the MHD claims because Alfvén-wave propagation and divergence preservation are sensitive to splitting lag.

    Authors: The Strang splitting is performed on the continuous conservation laws, separating advection from sources. Each resulting equation is discretized via LBM, with collision operators explicitly incorporating the local MHD sources (Lorentz force, induction contributions) at every step. This restores the cross-couplings discretely through collision rather than additional streaming. While the manuscript does not contain a formal a-priori truncation-error estimate, consistency follows from the kinetic recovery of the target equations and is supported by the reported benchmarks. We will add a short discussion of the expected splitting error order in the revised §3. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (Validation benchmarks): While convergence against established MHD test cases is reported, the manuscript does not quantify the splitting-induced phase-speed or divergence errors (e.g., via a dedicated table of L2 errors versus splitting time-step size). Without this, it is difficult to assess whether the observed agreement is due to the kinetic formulation or to sufficiently small splitting steps.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantification of splitting-induced errors would strengthen the validation. We will add results from a dedicated test (circularly polarized Alfvén wave) in which the splitting time-step size is varied, together with a table of L2 errors for phase speed and magnetic divergence. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: algorithmic proposal rests on independent structure, not self-referential reduction.

full rationale

The manuscript proposes a new LBM class via Strang splitting of conservation laws followed by independent kinetic transport of each state variable. No equations, fitted parameters, or predictions are shown that reduce by construction to inputs (e.g., no fitted ratio renamed as prediction, no self-citation chain invoked as uniqueness theorem). The central claim is an algorithmic construction whose validity is asserted to be demonstrated by benchmarks; it does not contain the enumerated circular patterns. This is the common honest outcome for a methods paper whose derivation chain is self-contained against external validation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach relies on standard kinetic theory for LBM and the applicability of Strang splitting to MHD equations; no free parameters or new entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Strang splitting of conservation equations is valid and enables decoupled transport for MHD systems
    Invoked to yield fully local operations on state variables

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5759 in / 1205 out tokens · 31146 ms · 2026-06-28T18:32:17.470399+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A unified gas kinetic scheme for continuum and rarefied flows v: Multiscale and multi-component plasma transport.Communications in Computational Physics, 22(5):1175–1223, 2017

    Chang Liu and Kun Xu. A unified gas kinetic scheme for continuum and rarefied flows v: Multiscale and multi-component plasma transport.Communications in Computational Physics, 22(5):1175–1223, 2017

    2017

  2. [2]

    High-order upwind schemes for multidimensional magnetohydrodynam- ics.The Astrophysical Journal, 530(1):508–524, 2000

    Pasquale Londrillo and Luca Del Zanna. High-order upwind schemes for multidimensional magnetohydrodynam- ics.The Astrophysical Journal, 530(1):508–524, 2000

    2000

  3. [3]

    Astrophysical weighted particle magnetohydrodynamics.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 414(1):129–154, 2011

    Evghenii Gaburov and Keigo Nitadori. Astrophysical weighted particle magnetohydrodynamics.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 414(1):129–154, 2011

    2011

  4. [4]

    The Lattice Boltzmann Method: Principles and Practice

    Timm Krueger, Halim Kusumaatmaja, Alexandr Kuzmin, Orest Shardt, Goncalo Silva, and Erlend Magnus Viggen. The Lattice Boltzmann Method: Principles and Practice. Graduate Texts in Physics. Springer, 2016

    2016

  5. [5]

    A positive- and bound-preserving vectorial lattice boltzmann method in two dimensions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15001, 2024

    Gauthier Wissocq, Yongle Liu, and Rémi Abgrall. A positive- and bound-preserving vectorial lattice boltzmann method in two dimensions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15001, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Simulation of strong nonlinear waves with vectorial lattice Boltzmann schemes.International Journal of Modern Physics C, 25(12):1441014, 2014

    François Dubois. Simulation of strong nonlinear waves with vectorial lattice Boltzmann schemes.International Journal of Modern Physics C, 25(12):1441014, 2014. 12 pages

    2014

  7. [7]

    On the kinetic theory of rarefied gases.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2(4):331–407, 1949

    Harold Grad. On the kinetic theory of rarefied gases.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2(4):331–407, 1949

    1949

  8. [8]

    Regularization of grad’s 13 moment equations: Derivation and linear analysis.Physics of Fluids, 15(9):2668–2680, 09 2003

    Henning Struchtrup and Manuel Torrilhon. Regularization of grad’s 13 moment equations: Derivation and linear analysis.Physics of Fluids, 15(9):2668–2680, 09 2003

    2003

  9. [9]

    On the construction and comparison of difference schemes.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 5(3):506–517, 1968

    Gilbert Strang. On the construction and comparison of difference schemes.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 5(3):506–517, 1968

    1968

  10. [10]

    Lattice boltzmann for linear elastodynamics: Peri- odic problems and dirichlet boundary conditions.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 433:117469, 2025

    Oliver Boolakee, Martin Geier, and Laura De Lorenzis. Lattice boltzmann for linear elastodynamics: Peri- odic problems and dirichlet boundary conditions.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 433:117469, 2025

    2025

  11. [11]

    Modeling of nonequilibrium effects in a compressible plasma based on the lattice boltzmann method.Physics of Plasmas, 31(9):093902, 2024

    Haoyu Huang, Ke Jin, Kai Li, and Xiaojing Zheng. Modeling of nonequilibrium effects in a compressible plasma based on the lattice boltzmann method.Physics of Plasmas, 31(9):093902, 2024

    2024

  12. [12]

    Stone, Thomas A

    James M. Stone, Thomas A. Gardiner, Peter Teuben, John F. Hawley, and Jacob B. Simon. Athena: A new code for astrophysical mhd.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 178(1):137, sep 2008

    2008

  13. [13]

    Paul J. Dellar. Lattice boltzmann magnetohydrodynamics with current-dependent resistivity.Journal of Computa- tional Physics, 237:115–131, 2013

    2013

  14. [14]

    Krause, Adrian Kummerländer, Samuel J

    Mathias J. Krause, Adrian Kummerländer, Samuel J. Avis, Halim Kusumaatmaja, Davide Dapelo, Fabian Klemens, Maximilian Gaedtke, Nicolas Hafen, Albert Mink, Robin Trunk, Jan E. Marquardt, Marie Luise Maier, Marc Haussmann, and Stephan Simonis. Openlb—open source lattice boltzmann code.Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 81:258–288, 2021

    2021

  15. [15]

    Adrian Kummerländer, Márcio Dorn, Martin Frank, and Mathias J. Krause. Implicit propagation of directly addressed grids in Lattice Boltzmann Methods.Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 35(8):e7509, 2023

    2023

  16. [16]

    Adrian Kummerländer, Fedor Bukreev, Leonardo Dorneles, Marcio Dorn, Shota Ito, and Mathias J. Krause. A hardware abstraction for exascale lattice boltzmann simulations: Rotor-resolved wind farms on aurora and lumi, 2026

    2026

  17. [17]

    Adrian Kummerländer, Fedor Bukreev, Dennis Teutscher, Márcio Dorn, and Mathias J. Krause. Optimization of single node load balancing for Lattice Boltzmann Method on heterogeneous high performance computers.Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 206, 2025

    2025

  18. [18]

    P. L. Bhatnagar, E. P. Gross, and M. Krook. A model for collision processes in gases. i. small amplitude processes in charged and neutral one-component systems.Phys. Rev., 94:511–525, May 1954

    1954

  19. [19]

    Lattice boltzmann method with regularized pre-collision distribution functions

    Jonas Latt and Bastien Chopard. Lattice boltzmann method with regularized pre-collision distribution functions. Math. Comput. Simul., 72(2–6):165–168, September 2006

    2006

  20. [20]

    Ginzburg, D

    I. Ginzburg, D. d’Humières, and A. Kuzmin. Two-relaxation-time lattice boltzmann scheme: About parametriza- tion, velocity, pressure and mixed boundary conditions.Communications in Computational Physics, 3(2):427–478, Mar. 2018

    2018

  21. [21]

    P. V . Coveney, S. Succi, Dominique d’Humières, Irina Ginzburg, Manfred Krafczyk, Pierre Lallemand, and Li-Shi Luo. Multiple–relaxation–time lattice boltzmann models in three dimensions.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 360(1792):437–451, 03 2002. 16 APREPRINT- JUNE2, 2026

    2002

  22. [22]

    Discrete lattice effects on the forcing term in the lattice boltzmann method.Phys

    Zhaoli Guo, Chuguang Zheng, and Baochang Shi. Discrete lattice effects on the forcing term in the lattice boltzmann method.Phys. Rev. E, 65:046308, Apr 2002

    2002

  23. [23]

    Zhenhua Chai and T. S. Zhao. Lattice boltzmann model for the convection-diffusion equation.Phys. Rev. E, 87:063309, Jun 2013

    2013

  24. [24]

    Megala Anandan and S. V . Raghurama Rao. On lattice boltzmann methods based on vector-kinetic models for hyperbolic partial differential equations.Computers & Fluids, 280:106348, 2024

    2024

  25. [25]

    Stability analysis of the vectorial lattice-boltzmann method, 2024

    Kévin Guillon, Romane Hélie, and Philippe Helluy. Stability analysis of the vectorial lattice-boltzmann method, 2024

    2024

  26. [26]

    Powell, Philip L

    Kenneth G. Powell, Philip L. Roe, Timur J. Linde, Tamas I. Gombosi, and Darren L. De Zeeuw. A solution- adaptive upwind scheme for ideal magnetohydrodynamics.Journal of Computational Physics, 154(2):284–309, 1999

    1999

  27. [27]

    Krause, Fabian Klemens, Thomas Henn, Robin Trunk, and Hermann Nirschl

    Mathias J. Krause, Fabian Klemens, Thomas Henn, Robin Trunk, and Hermann Nirschl. Particle flow simulations with homogenised lattice boltzmann methods.Particuology, 34:1–13, 2017

    2017

  28. [28]

    Adrian Kummerländer, B. Tur, M. Haase, Fedor Bukreev, M. Döllinger, Mathias J. Krause, and S. Kniesburges. Efficient fluid structure interaction simulation of vocal fold oscillations using a homogenized Lattice Boltzmann Method.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 457:119009, 2026

    2026

  29. [29]

    Krause, and Fedor Bukreev

    Adrian Kummerländer, Shota Ito, Maximilian Schecher, Davide Dapelo, Stephan Simonis, Mathias J. Krause, and Fedor Bukreev. Efficient wall-modelled large eddy simulation of rotors using homogenized Lattice Boltzmann Methods.International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, 2026

    2026

  30. [30]

    A penalization method to take into account obstacles in incompressible viscous flows.Numerische Mathematik, 81(4):497–520, February 1999

    Philippe Angot, Charles-Henri Bruneau, and Pierre Fabrie. A penalization method to take into account obstacles in incompressible viscous flows.Numerische Mathematik, 81(4):497–520, February 1999

    1999

  31. [31]

    An upwind differencing scheme for the equations of ideal magnetohydrodynamics.Journal of Computational Physics, 75(2):400–422, 1988

    M Brio and C.C Wu. An upwind differencing scheme for the equations of ideal magnetohydrodynamics.Journal of Computational Physics, 75(2):400–422, 1988

    1988

  32. [32]

    Krause, Adrian Kummerländer, Samuel J

    Mathias J. Krause, Adrian Kummerländer, Samuel J. Avis, Halim Kusumaatmaja, Davide Dapelo, Fabian Klemens, Maximilian Gaedtke, Nicolas Hafen, Albert Mink, Robin Trunk, Jan E. Marquardt, Marie-Luise Maier, Marc Haussmann, and Stephan Simonis. Openlb—open source lattice boltzmann code.Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 2021

    2021

  33. [33]

    Smith, Mateusz Paprocki, Ondˇrej ˇCertík, Sergey B

    Aaron Meurer, Christopher P. Smith, Mateusz Paprocki, Ondˇrej ˇCertík, Sergey B. Kirpichev, Matthew Rocklin, AMiT Kumar, Sergiu Ivanov, Jason K. Moore, Sartaj Singh, Thilina Rathnayake, Sean Vig, Brian E. Granger, Richard P. Muller, Francesco Bonazzi, Harsh Gupta, Shivam Vats, Fredrik Johansson, Fabian Pedregosa, Matthew J. Curry, Andy R. Terrel, Štˇepán ...

    2017

  34. [34]

    Shepard, Katherine De Kleer, Saverio Cambioni, Patrick A

    Michael K. Shepard, Katherine De Kleer, Saverio Cambioni, Patrick A. Taylor, Anne K. Virkki, Edgard G. Rívera-Valentin, Carolina Rodriguez Sanchez-Vahamonde, Luisa Fernanda Zambrano-Marin, Christopher Magri, David Dunham, John Moore, and Maria Camarca. Asteroid 16 Psyche: Shape, Features, and Global Map.The Planetary Science Journal, 2(4):125, August 2021

    2021

  35. [35]

    Asteroid Psyche 3D Model and Geometry

    NASA Science. Asteroid Psyche 3D Model and Geometry. https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/ asteroids/16-psyche/, 2025. Accessed: 2026-05-28

    2025

  36. [36]

    Joachim Müller, Sven Simon, Uwe Motschmann, Josef Schüle, Karl-Heinz Glassmeier, and Gavin J. Pringle. A.I.K.E.F.: Adaptive hybrid model for space plasma simulations.Computer Physics Communications, 182(4):946– 966, April 2011

    2011

  37. [37]

    Mejnertsen, J

    L. Mejnertsen, J. P. Eastwood, H. Hietala, S. J. Schwartz, and J. P. Chittenden. Global MHD Simulations of the Earth’s Bow Shock Shape and Motion Under Variable Solar Wind Conditions.Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 123(1):259–271, January 2018

    2018

  38. [38]

    Exner, D

    W. Exner, D. Heyner, L. Liuzzo, U. Motschmann, D. Shiota, K. Kusano, and T. Shibayama. Coronal mass ejection hits mercury: A.I.K.E.F. hybrid-code results compared to MESSENGER data.Planetary and Space Science, 153:89–99, April 2018

    2018

  39. [39]

    Koenders, K

    C. Koenders, K. H. Glassmeier, I. Richter, H. Ranocha, and U. Motschmann. Dynamical features and spatial structures of the plasma interaction region of 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko and the solar wind.Planetary and Space Science, 105:101–116, January 2015

    2015

  40. [40]

    Baptiste, Cristobal Rodero, Steven E

    José Marín, Tiffany M.G. Baptiste, Cristobal Rodero, Steven E. Williams, Steven A. Niederer, and Ignacio García-Fernández. Sciblend: Advanced data visualization workflows within blender.Computers & Graphics, 130:104264, 2025. 17

    2025