pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.01061 · v1 · pith:WZ34XNM6new · submitted 2026-05-31 · 🌀 gr-qc

Revisiting Schwarzschild's constant density star in isotropic coordinates

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 16:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords Schwarzschild starconstant densityisotropic coordinatesperfect fluidenergy conditionsnaked singularitygeneral relativity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Schwarzschild's constant density star simplifies in isotropic coordinates where the metric uses two rational functions directly tied to central density and pressure.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that the constant density star solution becomes easier to handle when rewritten in isotropic coordinates rather than the usual area coordinates. In this form the line element consists of two simple rational functions of the radial coordinate, and the two free parameters map directly onto the central density and central pressure. Local interior quantities such as the pressure profile then take especially simple expressions. The same coordinate choice also makes several special cases transparent, including a zero-density configuration in which pressure alone produces curvature and solutions containing naked singularities that obey all but the dominant energy condition.

Core claim

In isotropic coordinates the interior geometry of Schwarzschild's constant density star is described by a line element containing two simple rational functions of the radial coordinate. The parameters appearing in these functions are directly interpretable in terms of the central density and central pressure of the star. This representation renders local interior properties such as the pressure profile remarkably simple, while also permitting explicit construction of a zero-density solution that verifies pressure gravitates even without mass-energy density and of singular solutions containing naked singularities that satisfy all but one of the standard energy conditions.

What carries the argument

The isotropic-coordinate line element for the constant-density interior, built from two rational functions of the radial coordinate whose coefficients encode central density and central pressure.

If this is right

  • The pressure profile inside the star reduces to a simple algebraic expression.
  • A zero-density solution still curves spacetime solely due to nonzero pressure.
  • Naked singularities arise that obey all energy conditions except the dominant one.
  • Quasi-local quantities such as the Misner-Sharp mass remain slightly more involved than purely local ones.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same isotropic form could simplify analysis of other constant-density or near-constant fluid models.
  • The explicit zero-density and singular cases provide clean testbeds for the separate gravitational effects of pressure.
  • The coordinate choice may ease matching calculations between interior fluids and exterior vacuum regions in classroom settings.

Load-bearing premise

A static spherically symmetric perfect fluid with exactly constant density can be matched to an exterior vacuum solution while preserving the standard energy conditions except in the explicitly constructed singular cases.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the Einstein tensor from the proposed isotropic line element that fails to yield constant density together with the stated central pressure.

read the original abstract

Herein we shall revisit the venerable 110-year-old topic of Schwarzschild's constant density star, emphasizing that for many (though not quite all) purposes it is much easier to analyze this spacetime in isotropic coordinates (\emph{versus} the more usually adopted Hilbert--Droste area coordinates). The relevant line element is particularly transparent, containing two simple rational functions of the radial coordinate, and the two physical parameters appearing in this line element are easily and readily interpretable in terms of the central density and central pressure of the star. Local properties in the stellar interior (such as the pressure profile) will be seen to be remarkably simple, though quasi-local properties like the Misner--Sharp mass are just a little bit trickier. Apart from its simplicity and clarity, the analysis is also of considerable pedagogical interest. For instance, there are a number of interesting special cases. Mathematically there is a perfectly good solution corresponding to a zero density star -- which can physically be interpreted as an explicit verification of the fact that pressure gravitates, even in the absence of mass-energy density. Additionally, there is a singular solution containing a naked singularity that satisfies all but one of the standard classical energy conditions. Furthermore you can even do both, combining zero density with a naked singularity -- so that pressure by itself can generate naked singularities -- at the cost of merely violating the dominant energy condition, the least physical of the standard energy conditions. We argue that many physically interesting features of Schwarzschild's star are very much under-appreciated.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript revisits Schwarzschild's constant-density interior solution in isotropic coordinates, claiming that the metric is expressed with two simple rational functions of the radial coordinate, with parameters directly interpretable as central density and central pressure. It discusses the simplicity of local properties such as the pressure profile, and presents special cases including a zero-density star (illustrating that pressure gravitates), a naked singularity solution satisfying most energy conditions, and their combination.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the paper offers a pedagogically valuable and transparent reformulation of a classic GR solution, highlighting under-appreciated features like the role of pressure in generating curvature and the existence of mathematically consistent but physically marginal solutions. This could facilitate better understanding of matching conditions and energy conditions in spherical symmetry.

major comments (1)
  1. [singular branch analysis] Abstract and singular-branch section: the claim that the naked-singularity solution 'satisfies all but one of the standard classical energy conditions' is load-bearing for the special-cases discussion, yet the manuscript provides no explicit computation of the energy-momentum tensor components (rho, p_r, p_t) or their signs on that branch; the Einstein-equation derivation alone does not automatically verify the energy-condition pattern.
minor comments (2)
  1. [metric ansatz] The two free parameters in the isotropic line element are stated to map directly onto central density and central pressure; an explicit one-line relation between those parameters and the central values of rho and p would remove any ambiguity for readers.
  2. [global properties] Quasi-local quantities (Misner-Sharp mass) are described as 'a little bit trickier'; a short comparison table of the isotropic versus curvature-coordinate expressions would clarify the claimed pedagogical advantage.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and the recommendation of minor revision. The single major comment is addressed point-by-point below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [singular branch analysis] Abstract and singular-branch section: the claim that the naked-singularity solution 'satisfies all but one of the standard classical energy conditions' is load-bearing for the special-cases discussion, yet the manuscript provides no explicit computation of the energy-momentum tensor components (rho, p_r, p_t) or their signs on that branch; the Einstein-equation derivation alone does not automatically verify the energy-condition pattern.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from an explicit verification. In the revised version we will insert a short subsection (or appendix) that computes the energy-momentum tensor components directly from the metric for the singular branch, tabulates the signs of ρ, p_r and p_t, and confirms which of the standard energy conditions hold. This will make the claim fully self-contained and transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation from Einstein equations with constant-density ansatz

full rationale

The paper starts from the Einstein field equations for a static spherically symmetric perfect fluid with exactly constant density, solves for the metric functions in isotropic coordinates, and obtains explicit rational expressions whose parameters map directly to central density and pressure. All special cases (zero-density, naked-singularity, and combined) are constructed by the same direct substitution into the field equations. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then relabeled as a prediction, no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz, and the matching to the exterior vacuum is performed by explicit junction conditions. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

Relies on standard Einstein equations for perfect fluid, spherical symmetry, and constant density; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond the classical setup.

axioms (3)
  • standard math Einstein field equations with vanishing cosmological constant for perfect fluid
    Invoked to obtain the interior solution from the metric ansatz.
  • domain assumption Static spherically symmetric line element
    Standard symmetry reduction for stellar interiors.
  • domain assumption Constant energy density throughout the stellar interior
    Defining assumption that closes the system and yields the rational functions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5809 in / 1334 out tokens · 74742 ms · 2026-06-28T16:50:09.338426+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · 32 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    ¨Uber das Gravitationsfeld einer Kugel aus inkompressibler Fl¨ ussigkeit nach der Einsteinschen Theorie

    Karl Schwarzschild, “¨Uber das Gravitationsfeld einer Kugel aus inkompressibler Fl¨ ussigkeit nach der Einsteinschen Theorie” [On the gravitational field of a ball of incompressible fluid following Einstein’s theory]. Sitzungsberichte der K¨ oniglich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften7(2016) 424–434

  2. [2]

    On the Gravitational Field of a Sphere of Incompressible Liquid, According to Einstein’s Theory (translation)

    Karl Schwarzschild, “On the Gravitational Field of a Sphere of Incompressible Liquid, According to Einstein’s Theory (translation)”. The Abraham Zelmanov Journal,1(2008) 20–32. ISSN 1654-9163; ISSN 2001-7235 Translated by Larissa Borissova and Dmitri Rabounski

  3. [3]

    Static solutions of Einstein’s field equations for spheres of fluid

    R. C. Tolman, “Static solutions of Einstein’s field equations for spheres of fluid”, Phys. Rev.55(1939), 364-373 doi:10.1103/PhysRev.55.364

  4. [4]

    Schwarzschild Interior Solution in an Isotropic Coordinate System

    Max Wyman, “Schwarzschild Interior Solution in an Isotropic Coordinate System”, Physical Review70(July 1946) 74–76 doi:10.1103/PhysRev.70.74

  5. [5]

    Radially Symmetric Distributions of Matter

    M. Wyman, “Radially Symmetric Distributions of Matter”, Phys. Rev.75(1949), 1930-1936 doi:10.1103/PhysRev.75.1930

  6. [7]

    Fluid Spheres in General Relativity

    R. J. Adler, “Fluid Spheres in General Relativity”, J. Math. Phys.15(1974), 727 [erratum: J. Math. Phys.17(1976), 158] doi:10.1063/1.1666717

  7. [8]

    Physical Acceptability of Isolated, Static, Spherically Symmetric, Perfect Fluid Solutions of Einstein's Equations

    M. S. R. Delgaty and K. Lake, “Physical acceptability of isolated, static, spherically symmetric, perfect fluid solutions of Einstein’s equations”, Comput. Phys. Commun.115(1998), 395-415 doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(98)00130-1 [arXiv:gr-qc/9809013 [gr-qc]]

  8. [9]

    Spacetime geometry of static fluid spheres

    S. Rahman and M. Visser, “Space-time geometry of static fluid spheres”, Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002), 935-952 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/5/307 [arXiv:gr-qc/0103065 [gr-qc]]

  9. [10]

    All static spherically symmetric perfect fluid solutions of Einstein's Equations

    K. Lake, “All static spherically symmetric perfect fluid solutions of Einstein’s equations”, Phys. Rev. D67(2003), 104015 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.104015 [arXiv:gr-qc/0209104 [gr-qc]]

  10. [11]

    Exact solutions of Einstein’s field equations

    H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. A. H. MacCallum, C. Hoenselaers and E. Herlt, “Exact solutions of Einstein’s field equations”, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003, ISBN 978-0-521-46702-5, 978-0-511-05917-9 doi:10.1017/CBO9780511535185

  11. [12]

    Algorithmic construction of static perfect fluid spheres

    D. Martin and M. Visser, “Algorithmic construction of static perfect fluid spheres”, Phys. Rev. D69(2004), 104028 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.104028 [arXiv:gr-qc/0306109 [gr-qc]]. – 17 –

  12. [13]

    Dynamical instability of fluid spheres in the presence of a cosmological constant

    C. G. Boehmer and T. Harko, “Dynamical instability of fluid spheres in the presence of a cosmological constant”, Phys. Rev. D71(2005), 084026 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.084026 [arXiv:gr-qc/0504075 [gr-qc]]

  13. [14]

    Generating perfect fluid spheres in general relativity

    P. Boonserm, M. Visser and S. Weinfurtner, “Generating perfect fluid spheres in general relativity”, Phys. Rev. D71(2005), 124037 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.124037 [arXiv:gr-qc/0503007 [gr-qc]]

  14. [15]

    Some exact solutions in general relativity

    P. Boonserm, “Some exact solutions in general relativity”, (MSc thesis), [arXiv:gr-qc/0610149 [gr-qc]]

  15. [16]

    Solution generating theorems: perfect fluid spheres and the TOV equation

    P. Boonserm, M. Visser and S. Weinfurtner, “Solution generating theorems: Perfect fluid spheres and the TOV equation”, doi:10.1142/9789812834300 0388 [arXiv:gr-qc/0609099 [gr-qc]]

  16. [17]

    Perfect fluid spheres with cosmological constant

    C. G. Boehmer and G. Fodor, “Perfect fluid spheres with cosmological constant”, Phys. Rev. D77(2008), 064008 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.064008 [arXiv:0711.1450 [gr-qc]]

  17. [18]

    Buchdahl-like transformations for perfect fluid spheres

    P. Boonserm and M. Visser, “Buchdahl-like transformations for perfect fluid spheres”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D17(2008), 135-163 doi:10.1142/S0218271808011912 [arXiv:0707.0146 [gr-qc]]

  18. [19]

    Buchdahl-Like Transformations in General Relativity

    P. Boonserm and M. Visser, “Buchdahl-Like Transformations in General Relativity”, Thai Journal of Mathematics5(2007) no.Number 2, 209-223

  19. [20]

    Transforming the Einstein static Universe into physically acceptable static fluid spheres

    K. Lake, “Transforming the Einstein static Universe into physically acceptable static fluid spheres”, Phys. Rev. D77(2008), 127502 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.127502 [arXiv:0804.3092 [gr-qc]]

  20. [21]

    Generating Static Fluid Spheres by Conformal Transformations

    J. Loranger and K. Lake, “Generating Static Fluid Spheres by Conformal Transformations”, Phys. Rev. D78(2008), 127501 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.127501 [arXiv:0808.3515 [gr-qc]]

  21. [22]

    Transforming the Einstein static Universe into physically acceptable static fluid spheres II: A two - fold infinity of exact solutions

    C. Grenon, P. J. Elahi and K. Lake, “Transforming the Einstein static Universe into physically acceptable static fluid spheres. 2. A Two - fold infinity of exact solutions”, Phys. Rev. D78(2008), 044028 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.044028 [arXiv:0805.3329 [gr-qc]]

  22. [23]

    Exact Space-Times in Einstein’s General Relativity

    J. B. Griffiths and J. Podolsky, “Exact Space-Times in Einstein’s General Relativity”, Cambridge University Press, 2009, ISBN 978-1-139-48116-8 doi:10.1017/CBO9780511635397

  23. [24]

    Quasinormal modes of perfect fluid spheres

    P. Boonserm, K. Sansook and T. Ngampitipan, “Quasinormal modes of perfect fluid spheres”, AIP Conf. Proc.2423(2021), 020007 doi:10.1063/5.0075377 – 18 –

  24. [25]

    Ultracompact horizonless objects in order-reduced semiclassical gravity

    J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, R. Carballo-Rubio and L. J. Garay, “Ultracompact horizonless objects in order-reduced semiclassical gravity”, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) no.10, 104056 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.104056 [arXiv:2310.12668 [gr-qc]]

  25. [26]

    The Spacetime Geodesy of Perfect Fluid Spheres

    C. Simmonds and M. Visser, “The Spacetime Geodesy of Perfect Fluid Spheres”, Symmetry17(2025) no.12, 2043 doi:10.3390/sym17122043 [arXiv:2510.17159 [gr-qc]]

  26. [27]

    The field of a single centre in Einstein’s theory of gravitation, and the motion of a particle in that field

    Johannes Droste, “The field of a single centre in Einstein’s theory of gravitation, and the motion of a particle in that field”, Proceedings of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Science.19 # 1(1917) 197—215. (Submitted 27 May 1916.)

  27. [28]

    Golden Oldie: The field of a single centre in Einstein’s theory of gravitation, and the motion of a particle in that field

    Johannes Droste, “Golden Oldie: The field of a single centre in Einstein’s theory of gravitation, and the motion of a particle in that field”, General Relativity and Gravitation34(2002) 1545–1563. doi:10.1023/A:1020747322668

  28. [29]

    Editor’s note: The field of a single centre in Einstein’s theory of gravitation, and the motion of a particle in that field

    Johannes Droste, “Editor’s note: The field of a single centre in Einstein’s theory of gravitation, and the motion of a particle in that field”, General Relativity and Gravitation34(2002) 1541–1543. doi:10.1023/A:1020795205829

  29. [30]

    Die Grundlagen der Physik

    David Hilbert, “Die Grundlagen der Physik”, [The foundations of Physics], Nachr. Ges. Wiss. G¨ ottingen, Math. Phys. Kl. (1917) 53. (Submitted 23 December 1916.)

  30. [31]

    ¨Uber das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie

    Karl Schwarzschild, “¨Uber das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie”. [On the gravitational field of a point mass following Einstein’s theory]. Sitzungsberichte der K¨ oniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften7(1916) 189—196

  31. [32]

    On the gravitational field of a point mass following Einstein’s theory (translation)

    Karl Schwarzschild, “On the gravitational field of a point mass following Einstein’s theory (translation)”. The Abraham Zelmanov Journal,1(2008) 10–19. ISSN 1654-9163 Translated by Larissa Borissova and Dmitri Rabounski

  32. [33]

    K. A. Bronnikov and S. G. Rubin,Black Holes, Cosmology and Extra Dimensions, World Scientific, Singapore (2013)

  33. [34]

    Novel black-bounce spacetimes: wormholes, regularity, energy conditions, and causal structure

    F. S. N. Lobo, M. E. Rodrigues, M. V. de Sousa Silva, A. Simpson and M. Visser, “Novel black-bounce spacetimes: wormholes, regularity, energy conditions, and causal structure”, Phys. Rev. D103(2021) no.8, 084052 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.084052 [arXiv:2009.12057 [gr-qc]]. – 19 –

  34. [35]

    Quantized matter fields and the avoidance of singularities in general relativity

    L. Parker and S. A. Fulling, “Quantized matter fields and the avoidance of singularities in general relativity”, Phys. Rev. D7(1973), 2357-2374 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2357

  35. [36]

    Energy conditions and spacetime singularities

    F. J. Tipler, “Energy conditions and spacetime singularities”, Phys. Rev. D17(1978), 2521-2528 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.17.2521

  36. [37]

    Stellar collapse without singularities?

    T. A. Roman and P. G. Bergmann, “Stellar collapse without singularities?”, Phys. Rev. D28(1983), 1265-1277 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.28.1265

  37. [38]

    Geodesic focusing, energy conditions and singularities

    A. Borde, “Geodesic focusing, energy conditions and singularities”, Class. Quant. Grav.4(1987), 343-356 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/4/2/015

  38. [39]

    Energy conditions for an imperfect fluid

    D. Tsoubelis, N. O. Santos and C. A. Kolassis, “Energy conditions for an imperfect fluid”, Class. Quant. Grav.5(1988) no.10, 1329 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/5/10/011

  39. [40]

    Does quantum field theory enforce the averaged weak energy condition?

    U. Yurtsever, “Does quantum field theory enforce the averaged weak energy condition?”, Class. Quant. Grav.7(1990), L251-L258 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/7/11/005

  40. [41]

    Averaged Energy Conditions and Quantum Inequalities

    L. H. Ford and T. A. Roman, “Averaged energy conditions and quantum inequalities”, Phys. Rev. D51(1995), 4277-4286 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.4277 [arXiv:gr-qc/9410043 [gr-qc]]

  41. [42]

    Energy conditions in the epoch of galaxy formation

    M. Visser, “Energy conditions in the epoch of galaxy formation”, Science276(1997), 88-90 doi:10.1126/science.276.5309.88 [arXiv:1501.01619 [gr-qc]]

  42. [43]

    General Relativistic Energy Conditions: The Hubble expansion in the epoch of galaxy formation

    M. Visser, “General relativistic energy conditions: The Hubble expansion in the epoch of galaxy formation”, Phys. Rev. D56(1997), 7578-7587 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.56.7578 [arXiv:gr-qc/9705070 [gr-qc]]

  43. [44]

    Energy conditions and their cosmological implications

    M. Visser and C. Barcel´ o, “Energy conditions and their cosmological implications”, doi:10.1142/9789812792129 0014 [arXiv:gr-qc/0001099 [gr-qc]]

  44. [45]

    Twilight for the energy conditions?

    C. Barcel´ o and M. Visser, “Twilight for the energy conditions?”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D11(2002), 1553-1560. doi:10.1142/S0218271802002888 [arXiv:gr-qc/0205066 [gr-qc]]

  45. [46]

    Some Thoughts on Energy Conditions and Wormholes

    T. A. Roman, “Some thoughts on energy conditions and wormholes”, doi:10.1142/9789812704030 0236 [arXiv:gr-qc/0409090 [gr-qc]]

  46. [47]

    Singularity theorems from weakened energy conditions

    C. J. Fewster and G. J. Galloway, “Singularity theorems from weakened energy conditions”, Class. Quant. Grav.28(2011), 125009 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/12/125009 [arXiv:1012.6038 [gr-qc]]

  47. [48]

    Classical and quantum flux energy conditions for quantum vacuum states

    P. Mart´ ın-Moruno and M. Visser, “Classical and quantum flux energy conditions for quantum vacuum states”, Phys. Rev. D88(2013) no.6, 061701 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.061701 [arXiv:1305.1993 [gr-qc]]. – 20 –

  48. [49]

    Semiclassical energy conditions for quantum vacuum states

    P. Mart´ ın-Moruno and M. Visser, “Semiclassical energy conditions for quantum vacuum states”, JHEP09(2013), 050 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2013)050 [arXiv:1306.2076 [gr-qc]]

  49. [50]

    A Primer on Energy Conditions

    E. Curiel, “A Primer on Energy Conditions”, Einstein Stud.13(2017), 43-104. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3210-8 3 [arXiv:1405.0403 [physics.hist-ph]]

  50. [52]

    Wormholes, Warp Drives and Energy Conditions

    F. S. N. Lobo, “Wormholes, Warp Drives and Energy Conditions”, Fundam. Theor. Phys.189(2017), pp.-279 Springer, 2017, ISBN 978-3-319-55181-4, 978-3-319-85588-2, 978-3-319-55182-1 doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55182-1 [arXiv:2103.05610 [gr-qc]]

  51. [53]

    Wormholes, energy conditions and time machines

    F. S. N. Lobo and D. Rubiera-Garcia, “Wormholes, energy conditions and time machines”, doi:10.1142/9789811258251 0074 [arXiv:2008.09902 [gr-qc]]

  52. [54]

    Energy conditions in general relativity and quantum field theory

    E. A. Kontou and K. Sanders, “Energy conditions in general relativity and quantum field theory”, Class. Quant. Grav.37(2020) no.19, 193001 doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab8fcf [arXiv:2003.01815 [gr-qc]]

  53. [55]

    Penrose inequality for integral energy conditions

    E. Hafemann and E. A. Kontou, “Penrose inequality for integral energy conditions”, Class. Quant. Grav.42(2025) no.19, 195016 doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ae0405 [arXiv:2504.19794 [gr-qc]]

  54. [56]

    The sufficiently trapped surface

    E. A. Kontou, “The sufficiently trapped surface”, [arXiv:2605.14798 [gr-qc]]

  55. [57]

    Energy conditions in static, spherically symmetric spacetimes and effective geometries

    Z. L. Wang and E. Battista, “Energy conditions in static, spherically symmetric spacetimes and effective geometries”, [arXiv:2604.16545 [gr-qc]]

  56. [58]

    Families of regular spacetimes and energy conditions

    Z. L. Wang and E. Battista, “Families of regular spacetimes and energy conditions”, [arXiv:2605.03428 [gr-qc]]

  57. [59]

    Modave lectures on energy conditions in quantum field theory and semi-classical gravity

    J. R. Fliss, “Modave lectures on energy conditions in quantum field theory and semi-classical gravity”, [arXiv:2605.18964 [hep-th]]

  58. [60]

    Gravitational vacuum polarization I: Energy conditions in the Hartle--Hawking vacuum

    M. Visser, “Gravitational vacuum polarization. 1: Energy conditions in the Hartle-Hawking vacuum”, Phys. Rev. D54(1996), 5103-5115 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.54.5103 [arXiv:gr-qc/9604007 [gr-qc]]

  59. [61]

    Gravitational vacuum polarization II: Energy conditions in the Boulware vacuum

    M. Visser, “Gravitational vacuum polarization. 2: Energy conditions in the Boulware vacuum”, Phys. Rev. D54(1996), 5116-5122 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.54.5116 [arXiv:gr-qc/9604008 [gr-qc]]

  60. [62]

    Gravitational vacuum polarization III: Energy conditions in the (1+1) Schwarzschild spacetime

    M. Visser, “Gravitational vacuum polarization. 3: Energy conditions in the (1+1) Schwarzschild space-time”, Phys. Rev. D54(1996), 5123-5128 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.54.5123 [arXiv:gr-qc/9604009 [gr-qc]]. – 21 –

  61. [63]

    Gravitational vacuum polarization IV: Energy conditions in the Unruh vacuum

    M. Visser, “Gravitational vacuum polarization. 4: Energy conditions in the Unruh vacuum”, Phys. Rev. D56(1997), 936-952 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.56.936 [arXiv:gr-qc/9703001 [gr-qc]]

  62. [64]

    Gravitational vacuum polarization

    M. Visser, “Gravitational vacuum polarization”, 8th Marcel Grossmann Meeting (MG8), Jerusalem, June 1997, [arXiv:gr-qc/9710034 [gr-qc]]

  63. [65]

    Relativistic equations for adiabatic, spherically symmetric gravitational collapse

    C. W. Misner and D. H. Sharp, “Relativistic equations for adiabatic, spherically symmetric gravitational collapse”, Phys. Rev.136(1964), B571-B576 doi:10.1103/PhysRev.136.B571

  64. [66]

    Observer Time as a Coordinate in Relativistic Spherical Hydrodynamics

    W. C. Hernandez and C. W. Misner, “Observer Time as a Coordinate in Relativistic Spherical Hydrodynamics”, Astrophys. J.143(1966), 452 doi:10.1086/148525

  65. [67]

    General Relativistic Fluid Spheres

    H. A. Buchdahl, “General Relativistic Fluid Spheres”, Phys. Rev. 116, 1027 (1959). doi:10.1103/PhysRev.116.1027

  66. [68]

    Massive spheres in general relativity

    H. Bondi, “Massive spheres in general relativity”. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 282, 303?317 (1964). doi:10.1098/rspa.1964.0234

  67. [69]

    Breaking Buchdahl: Ultracompact stars in semiclassical gravity

    J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, R. Carballo-Rubio and L. J. Garay, “Breaking Buchdahl: Ultracompact stars in semiclassical gravity”, doi:10.1142/9789811269776 0208 [arXiv::2110.15680 [gr-qc]]

  68. [70]

    Beyond Buchdahl’s limit: Bilayered stars and thin-shell configurations

    J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, G. Garc´ ıa-Moreno and J. Polo-G´ omez, “Beyond Buchdahl’s limit: Bilayered stars and thin-shell configurations”, Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.12, 12 doi:10.1103/dqbd-9z5f [arXiv:2411.14018 [gr-qc]]

  69. [71]

    Buchdahl limits in theories with regular black holes

    P. Bueno, R. A. Hennigar, ´A. J. Murcia and A. Vicente-Cano, “Buchdahl limits in theories with regular black holes”. Phys. Rev. D113(2026) no.8, 084008 doi:10.1103/mcrq-6fl3 [arXiv:2512.19796 [gr-qc]]

  70. [72]

    Causality as a guiding principle for physics beyond General Relativity

    G. Garc´ ıa-Moreno, “Causality as a guiding principle for physics beyond General Relativity”, [arXiv:2510.18419 [gr-qc]]

  71. [73]

    Gravastars must have anisotropic pressures

    C. Cattoen, T. Faber and M. Visser, “Gravastars must have anisotropic pressures”, Class. Quant. Grav.22(2005), 4189-4202 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/22/20/002 [arXiv:gr-qc/0505137 [gr-qc]]

  72. [74]

    Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity

    W. Israel, “Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity”, Nuovo Cim. B44S10(1966), 1 [erratum: Nuovo Cim. B48(1967), 463] doi:10.1007/BF02710419

  73. [75]

    Fl¨ achenhafte Verteilung der Materie in der Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie

    K. Lanczos, “Fl¨ achenhafte Verteilung der Materie in der Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie”, Annalen Phys.379(1924) no.14, 518-540 doi:10.1002/andp.19243791403 – 22 –

  74. [76]

    ¨Uber die Grenzbedingungen des Schwerefeldes an Unstetigkeitsfl¨ achen

    Nikhilranjan Sen, “¨Uber die Grenzbedingungen des Schwerefeldes an Unstetigkeitsfl¨ achen”, Annalen Phys.378(1924) no.5-6, 365-396 doi:10.1002/andp.19243780505

  75. [77]

    Moduli fields and brane tensions: generalizing the junction conditions

    C. Barcel´ o and M. Visser, “Moduli fields and brane tensions: Generalizing the junction conditions”, Phys. Rev. D63(2001), 024004 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.024004 [arXiv:gr-qc/0008008 [gr-qc]]

  76. [78]

    General solutions of Einstein's spherically symmetric gravitational equations with junction conditions

    A. Das, A. DeBenedictis and N. Tariq, “General solutions of Einstein’s spherically symmetric gravitational equations with junction conditions”, J. Math. Phys.44 (2003), 5637-5655 doi:10.1063/1.1621056 [arXiv:gr-qc/0307009 [gr-qc]]

  77. [79]

    Linearized stability analysis of thin-shell wormholes with a cosmological constant

    F. S. N. Lobo and P. Crawford, “Linearized stability analysis of thin shell wormholes with a cosmological constant”, Class. Quant. Grav.21(2004), 391-404 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/2/004 [arXiv:gr-qc/0311002 [gr-qc]]

  78. [80]

    Surface stresses on a thin shell surrounding a traversable wormhole

    F. S. N. Lobo, “Surface stresses on a thin shell surrounding a traversable wormhole”, Class. Quant. Grav.21(2004), 4811-4832 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/21/005 [arXiv:gr-qc/0409018 [gr-qc]]

  79. [81]

    Energy Conditions and Junction Conditions

    D. Marolf and S. Yaida, “Energy conditions and junction conditions”, Phys. Rev. D72(2005), 044016 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.044016 [arXiv:gr-qc/0505048 [gr-qc]]

  80. [82]

    Generalized Darmois–Israel Junction Conditions

    C. S. Chu and H. S. Tan, “Generalized Darmois–Israel Junction Conditions”, Universe8(2022) no.5, 250 doi:10.3390/universe8050250 [arXiv:2103.06314 [hep-th]]

Showing first 80 references.