pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.02619 · v1 · pith:5MR7DA7Onew · submitted 2026-05-27 · ⚛️ physics.ins-det · cond-mat.mes-hall

Polariton spectroscopy at the diamond K-edge via X-ray parametric down-conversion

Fridtjof Kerker , Dietrich Krebs , Xenia Brockm\"uller , Ankita Negi , Christoph J. Sahle , Blanka Detlefs , Christina Boemer This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 08:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ins-det cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords polaritonX-ray parametric down-conversiondiamond K-edgestrong couplingrefractive indexx-ray spectroscopyhybridization
0
0 comments X

The pith

X-ray parametric down-conversion at the diamond K-edge produces polariton hybridization that enters the strong-coupling regime.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that XPDC around the carbon K-shell absorption edge in diamond yields clear signatures of polaritons formed by hybridization between down-converted photons and electronic excitations. These signatures are stronger than in prior non-resonant cases and reach the strong-coupling regime, as confirmed by a polariton spectral map and theoretical modeling. The same data also yield the bulk refractive index at high spectral resolution near the edge. A reader would care because the approach supplies a new route to probe and control high-energy polaritons tied to core-level states.

Core claim

XPDC provides access to high-energy polaritons resulting from hybridization of down-converted photons with electronic excitations in a nonlinear medium. Around the K-shell absorption edge in diamond the measurements display pronounced signatures of this hybridization, visualized through a polariton spectral map and analyzed with theoretical modeling. The hybridization produces substantially higher coupling strength than previously reported for a non-resonant case and reaches well into the strong-coupling regime. The same polaritonic XPDC measurements allow extraction of the refractive index for bulk diamond at high spectral resolution around the carbon K-edge.

What carries the argument

Polariton spectral map together with theoretical modeling of the XPDC process, which isolates the hybridization signatures between down-converted photons and K-edge excitations.

Load-bearing premise

The observed spectral features arise primarily from polaritonic hybridization rather than competing nonlinear processes or absorption artifacts, and the fitting model does not reproduce the data without the polariton mechanism.

What would settle it

An experiment or calculation in which the same spectral features appear when the data are fitted with a model containing only linear absorption and no polariton term, or a measurement showing no increase in coupling strength when tuned across the K-edge.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.02619 by Ankita Negi, Blanka Detlefs, Christina Boemer, Christoph J. Sahle, Dietrich Krebs, Fridtjof Kerker, Xenia Brockm\"uller.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Emergence and detection mechanism of polaritons via XPDC: (a) The pump photon (k p) spontaneously splits into a correlated photon pair of lower energies, the signal (ks) and idler (ki). Subsequent absorption and re-emission of the EUV-idler quantum within the material forms the polariton - a hybridization of photonic and electronically excited states. The higher-energy signal photon is diffracted and carri… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Spectral features of polaritonic scattering: (a) Inelastic x-ray scattering signal measured around the Carbon K-shell ionization edge. Characteristic XPDC scattering signatures (b) directly at the carbon K-edge at 291 eV, (c) at the third spectral peak at 306 eV and (d) behind all pronounced edges at 310 eV. Selected energies are indicated by vertical dashed lines in (a). The patterns exhibit pronounced va… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: 2D polariton spectral maps: (a) Central lineouts of the experimental scattering signal (without subtracting the background) are plotted against the energy transfer (or detection energy) ωd = ωp −ωs in one dimension (vertical axis) and the effective idler momentum c|ki | rescaled to energy in the other dimension (horizontal axis). The map shows a distinct nodal line across the diagonal (black dashed line is… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of experimental (left) and simulated (right) scattering signatures for different polaritonic energies around the Carbon K-edge at (a) 291 eV, (b) 306 eV and (c) 310 eV (cf [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spectral dependence of polaritonic parameters: a) The coupling strength V extracted via the TLS model (green points with error-bars) for different detection energies ωd = ωp −ωs closely follows the scaled IXS signal (blue line). b) The measured refractive index n at the K-edge in diamond (green points with error bars) for varying detection energies ωd agrees well with simulated data from DFT calculations (… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

It has recently been shown that x-ray parametric down-conversion (XPDC) provides access to high-energy polaritons, resulting from the hybridization of down-converted photons with electronic excitations in a nonlinear medium. Here, we present a spectrally resolved study of this effect around the K-shell absorption edge in diamond. Our results exhibit pronounced signatures of polaritonic hybridization, which we visualize by introducing a polariton spectral map and analyze by help of theoretical modelling. We find that the hybridization at this absorption edge results in substantially higher coupling strength than previously reported for a non-resonant case and reaches well into the strong-coupling regime. In addition, we demonstrate how our measurements of polaritonic XPDC allow us to extract the refractive index for bulk diamond at high spectral resolution around the carbon K-edge.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a spectrally resolved X-ray parametric down-conversion (XPDC) experiment at the carbon K-edge in diamond. It introduces a polariton spectral map to visualize hybridization signatures between down-converted photons and electronic excitations, analyzes the data with theoretical modeling, claims substantially higher coupling strengths than prior non-resonant cases that reach the strong-coupling regime, and shows that the measurements enable high-resolution extraction of the bulk refractive index around the K-edge.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the work would establish XPDC-based polariton spectroscopy as a practical route to strong-coupling studies at core-level edges, offering a new experimental handle on X-ray polaritonics and a method for precise refractive-index determination that complements existing techniques.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theoretical modelling] Theoretical modelling section: the description of the model used to fit the polariton spectral map and extract the coupling strength does not include the explicit form of the interaction Hamiltonian, the fitting procedure, or quantitative metrics (e.g., χ² or residual comparison) showing that the polariton term is required; without this, it remains possible that phenomenological absorption or competing χ^(3) processes could reproduce the reported line shapes and apparent splitting.
  2. [Results and discussion] Results and discussion: the manuscript presents no raw spectra, error bars on the extracted coupling strengths, or tabulated fit parameters with uncertainties, so the claim that the hybridization 'reaches well into the strong-coupling regime' and exceeds prior non-resonant values cannot be quantitatively assessed from the provided data.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions for the polariton spectral map should explicitly state the normalization, energy resolution, and any background subtraction applied.
  2. [Abstract and refractive-index extraction] The abstract states that the refractive index is extracted 'at high spectral resolution,' but the main text does not specify the achieved resolution or compare it to tabulated values near the K-edge.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Theoretical modelling] Theoretical modelling section: the description of the model used to fit the polariton spectral map and extract the coupling strength does not include the explicit form of the interaction Hamiltonian, the fitting procedure, or quantitative metrics (e.g., χ² or residual comparison) showing that the polariton term is required; without this, it remains possible that phenomenological absorption or competing χ^(3) processes could reproduce the reported line shapes and apparent splitting.

    Authors: We agree that the theoretical modelling section requires additional detail to fully substantiate the analysis. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly state the interaction Hamiltonian employed for the polariton spectral map, describe the fitting procedure (including initial parameters and constraints), and supply quantitative goodness-of-fit metrics such as χ² values together with residual plots. These additions will demonstrate that the polariton term is necessary and that simpler phenomenological absorption models or competing χ^(3) processes do not reproduce the observed line shapes and apparent splitting. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results and discussion] Results and discussion: the manuscript presents no raw spectra, error bars on the extracted coupling strengths, or tabulated fit parameters with uncertainties, so the claim that the hybridization 'reaches well into the strong-coupling regime' and exceeds prior non-resonant values cannot be quantitatively assessed from the provided data.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current presentation omits raw spectra, error bars, and tabulated parameters with uncertainties. In the revision we will add the raw spectra (as supplementary material if space is limited), include error bars on all extracted coupling strengths, and provide a table of fit parameters together with their uncertainties. These changes will enable quantitative evaluation of the strong-coupling claim and direct comparison with prior non-resonant results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental data and modeling remain independent.

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental XPDC spectra around the diamond K-edge, introduces a polariton spectral map as a visualization tool, and applies separate theoretical modeling to extract coupling strengths and refractive index values. No quoted derivation step reduces the reported hybridization signatures, coupling strength, or extracted index to a fitted input or self-citation by construction; the central claims rest on measured spectral features analyzed against an external model rather than tautological redefinition. This is the expected outcome for an experimental spectroscopy study with independent fitting.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The work implicitly assumes standard nonlinear optics and polariton theory without detailing any ad-hoc additions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5692 in / 1037 out tokens · 27002 ms · 2026-06-29T08:59:26.187861+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A., Fadeev, V

    Akhmanov, S. A., Fadeev, V . V ., Khokhlov, R. V . & Chunaev, O. N. Quantum Noise in Parametric Light Amplifiers. ZhETF Pisma Redaktsiiu6, 575 (1967)

    1967

  2. [2]

    E., Oshman, M

    Harris, S. E., Oshman, M. K. & Byer, R. L. Observation of Tunable Optical Parametric Fluorescence.Phys. Rev. Lett.18, 732–734, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.18.732 (1967)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.18.732 1967

  3. [3]

    & Chunaev, O

    Akhmanov, S., Fadeev, V ., Khokhlov, R. & Chunaev, O. Quantum noise in parametric light amplifiers.JETP Lett6(1967)

    1967

  4. [4]

    & Mahr, H

    Magde, D. & Mahr, H. Study in Ammonium Dihydrogen Phosphate of Spontaneous Parametric Interaction Tunable from 4400 to 16 000 Å.Phys. Rev. Lett.18, 905–907, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.18.905 (1967)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.18.905 1967

  5. [5]

    Giordmaine, J. A. & Miller, R. C. Tunable Coherent Parametric Oscillation in LiNb O 3 at Optical Frequencies.Phys. Rev. Lett.14, 973–976, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.973 (1965)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.14.973 1965

  6. [6]

    A., Kovrigin, A., Piskarskas, A., Fadeev, V

    Akhmanov, S. A., Kovrigin, A., Piskarskas, A., Fadeev, V . & Khokhlov, R. Observation of parametric amplification in the optical range.JETP Lett2, 191 (1965). 9.Menzel, R.Photonics: linear and nonlinear interactions of laser light and matter(Springer, Berlin, 2007), 2nd ed edn

    1965

  7. [7]

    Li, B.et al.Down-converted photon pairs in a high-Q silicon nitride microresonator.Nature639, 922–927, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-08662-3 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08662-3 2025

  8. [8]

    J.et al.NIF final optics system: frequency conversion and beam conditioning

    Wegner, P. J.et al.NIF final optics system: frequency conversion and beam conditioning. 180, DOI: 10.1117/12.538481 (San Jose, Ca, 2004)

    work page doi:10.1117/12.538481 2004

  9. [9]

    Zhang, S.et al.Recent advances in nonlinear optics for bio-imaging applications.Opto-Electronic Adv.3, 200003–200003, DOI: 10.29026/oea.2020.200003 (2020)

    work page doi:10.29026/oea.2020.200003 2020

  10. [10]

    M., Peacock, A

    Dudley, J. M., Peacock, A. C., Stiller, B. & Tissoni, G. Nonlinear optics and its applications 2024. InProc. of SPIE V ol, vol. 13004, 1300401–1 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    G.et al.New High-Intensity Source of Polarization-Entangled Photon Pairs.Phys

    Kwiat, P. G.et al.New High-Intensity Source of Polarization-Entangled Photon Pairs.Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 4337–4341, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4337 (1995)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.4337 1995

  12. [12]

    H., Klyshko, D

    Rubin, M. H., Klyshko, D. N., Shih, Y . H. & Sergienko, A. V . Theory of two-photon entanglement in type-II optical parametric down-conversion.Phys. Rev. A50, 5122–5133, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.50.5122 (1994)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.50.5122 1994

  13. [13]

    H.et al.A large-scale reconfigurable multiplexed quantum photonic network.Nat

    Valencia, N. H.et al.A large-scale reconfigurable multiplexed quantum photonic network.Nat. PhotonicsDOI: 10.1038/s41566-025-01806-x (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-025-01806-x 2025

  14. [14]

    Commun.16, 9616, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-64620-7 (2025)

    Lu, Z.et al.Counter-propagating entangled photon pairs from monolayer GaSe.Nat. Commun.16, 9616, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-64620-7 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64620-7 2025

  15. [15]

    Chakraborty, T.et al.Towards a spectrally multiplexed quantum repeater.npj Quantum Inf.11, 3, DOI: 10.1038/ s41534-024-00946-2 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    Commun.16, 1899, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56436-2 (2025)

    Lyu, X.et al.A tunable entangled photon-pair source based on a Van der Waals insulator.Nat. Commun.16, 1899, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56436-2 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-56436-2 2025

  17. [17]

    Hopfield, J. J. Theory of the Contribution of Excitons to the Complex Dielectric Constant of Crystals.Phys. Rev.112, 1555–1567, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.112.1555 (1958)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.112.1555 1958

  18. [18]

    N., Asenjo-Garcia, A., Schuck, P

    Basov, D. N., Asenjo-Garcia, A., Schuck, P. J., Zhu, X. & Rubio, A. Polariton panorama.Nanophotonics10, 549–577, DOI: 10.1515/nanoph-2020-0449 (2020). 22.Klyshko, D. N. Scattering of light in a medium with nonlinear polarizability.JETP28(1968)

    work page doi:10.1515/nanoph-2020-0449 2020

  19. [19]

    Commun.16, DOI: 10.1038/ s41467-025-60845-8 (2025)

    Krebs, D.et al.X-ray parametric down-conversion reveals EUV-polariton.Nat. Commun.16, DOI: 10.1038/ s41467-025-60845-8 (2025). Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 10/12

    2025

  20. [20]

    Coffinet, J. P. & De Martini, F. Coherent Excitation of Polaritons in Gallium Phosphide.Phys. Rev. Lett.22, 60–64, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.22.60 (1969)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.22.60 1969

  21. [21]

    A., Polivanov, Y

    Kulevsky, L. A., Polivanov, Y . N. & Poluektov, S. N. Light scattering by polaritons in LiIO3.J. Raman Spectrosc.3, 239–254, DOI: 10.1002/jrs.1250030213 (1975)

    work page doi:10.1002/jrs.1250030213 1975

  22. [22]

    & Panin, A

    Aktsipetrov, A., Ivanov, V . & Panin, A. Frequency-angle spectrum of light scattering by polaritons and interference of susceptibilities of different orders.Zh. Eksp. Teor . Fiz78, 2309–2315 (1980)

    1980

  23. [23]

    Chekhova, M. V . & Penin, A. N. Study of second-order excitations in α-iodic acid crystal by means of polaritonk -spectroscopy.J. Raman Spectrosc.24, 581–584, DOI: 10.1002/jrs.1250240904 (1993)

    work page doi:10.1002/jrs.1250240904 1993

  24. [24]

    Synchrotron Radiat.24, 521–530, DOI: 10.1107/S1600577516020579 (2017)

    Huotari, S.et al.A large-solid-angle X-ray Raman scattering spectrometer at ID20 of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility.J. Synchrotron Radiat.24, 521–530, DOI: 10.1107/S1600577516020579 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1107/s1600577516020579 2017

  25. [25]

    Henry, C. H. & Hopfield, J. J. Raman Scattering by Polaritons.Phys. Rev. Lett.15, 964–966, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 15.964 (1965)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 1965

  26. [26]

    J.et al.Planning, performing and analyzing X-ray Raman scattering experiments.J

    Sahle, C. J.et al.Planning, performing and analyzing X-ray Raman scattering experiments.J. Synchrotron Radiat.22, 400–409, DOI: 10.1107/S1600577514027581 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1107/s1600577514027581 2015

  27. [27]

    A., Nygård, K., Huotari, S

    Galambosi, S., Soininen, J. A., Nygård, K., Huotari, S. & Hämäläinen, K. Symmetry of the 1 s core exciton in diamond studied using x-ray Raman scattering.Phys. Rev. B76, 195112, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.195112 (2007)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.195112 2007

  28. [28]

    F., Himpsel, F

    Morar, J. F., Himpsel, F. J., Hollinger, G., Hughes, G. & Jordan, J. L. Observation of a C- 1 s Core Exciton in Diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett.54, 1960–1963, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1960 (1985)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.54.1960 1960

  29. [29]

    Effects of Configuration Interaction on Intensities and Phase Shifts.Phys

    Fano, U. Effects of Configuration Interaction on Intensities and Phase Shifts.Phys. Rev.124, 1866–1878, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.124.1866 (1961)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.124.1866 1961

  30. [30]

    Weinhardt, L.et al.Resonant inelastic soft x-ray scattering of CdS: A two-dimensional electronic structure map approach. Phys. Rev. B79, 165305, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.165305 (2009)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.79.165305 2009

  31. [31]

    Generalized two-dimensional correlation method applicable to infrared, raman, and other types of spectroscopy

    Noda, I. Generalized two-dimensional correlation method applicable to infrared, raman, and other types of spectroscopy. Appl. Spectrosc.47, 1329–1336, DOI: 10.1366/0003702934067694 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1366/0003702934067694

    work page doi:10.1366/0003702934067694 1993

  32. [32]

    Lattice Vibrations and Optical Waves in Ionic Crystals.Nature167, 779–780, DOI: 10.1038/167779b0 (1951)

    Huang, K. Lattice Vibrations and Optical Waves in Ionic Crystals.Nature167, 779–780, DOI: 10.1038/167779b0 (1951)

    work page doi:10.1038/167779b0 1951

  33. [33]

    Rev.123, 9786–9879, DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00855 (2023)

    Mandal, A.et al.Theoretical Advances in Polariton Chemistry and Molecular Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics.Chem. Rev.123, 9786–9879, DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00855 (2023). 38.Törmä, P. & Barnes, W. L. Strong coupling between surface plasmon polaritons and emitters: a review.Reports on Prog. Phys.78, 013901, DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/78/1/013901 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00855 2023

  34. [34]

    Ebbesen, T. W. Hybrid Light–Matter States in a Molecular and Material Science Perspective.Accounts Chem. Res.49, 2403–2412, DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00295 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00295 2016

  35. [35]

    & Collini, E

    Toffoletti, F. & Collini, E. Coherent phenomena in exciton–polariton systems.J. Physics: Mater.8, 022002, DOI: 10.1088/2515-7639/adcbd6 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1088/2515-7639/adcbd6 2025

  36. [36]

    G., Wersäll, M., Cuadra, J., Antosiewicz, T

    Baranov, D. G., Wersäll, M., Cuadra, J., Antosiewicz, T. J. & Shegai, T. Novel Nanostructures and Materials for Strong Light–Matter Interactions.ACS Photonics5, 24–42, DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00674 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00674 2018

  37. [37]

    & V olz, J

    Blaha, M., Johnson, A., Rauschenbeutel, A. & V olz, J. Beyond the Tavis-Cummings model: Revisiting cavity QED with ensembles of quantum emitters.Phys. Rev. A105, 013719, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.013719 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.105.013719 2022

  38. [38]

    Schülke, W.Electron dynamics by inelastic X-ray scattering. No. 7 in Oxford series on synchrotron radiation (Oxford University Press, Oxford ; New York, 2007). OCLC: ocm85862430

    2007

  39. [39]

    Boemer, C.et al.Towards novel probes for valence chargesviaX-ray optical wave mixing.Faraday Discuss.228, 451–469, DOI: 10.1039/D0FD00130A (2021)

    work page doi:10.1039/d0fd00130a 2021

  40. [40]

    S., Ellis, D

    Painter, G. S., Ellis, D. E. & Lubinsky, A. R. Ab initio calculation of the electronic structure and optical properties of diamond using the discrete variational method.Phys. Rev. B4, 3610–3622, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.4.3610 (1971)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.4.3610 1971

  41. [41]

    & Ishikawa, T

    Tamasaku, K., Sawada, K. & Ishikawa, T. Determining X-Ray Nonlinear Susceptibility of Diamond by the Optical Fano Effect.Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 254801, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.254801 (2009)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.254801 2009

  42. [42]

    J., Ciuti, C

    Garcia-Vidal, F. J., Ciuti, C. & Ebbesen, T. W. Manipulating matter by strong coupling to vacuum fields.Science373, eabd0336, DOI: 10.1126/science.abd0336 (2021). 11/12

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abd0336 2021

  43. [43]

    I., Feist, J

    Sánchez-Barquilla, M., Fernández-Domínguez, A. I., Feist, J. & García-Vidal, F. J. A Theoretical Perspective on Molecular Polaritonics.ACS Photonics9, 1830–1841, DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c00048 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.2c00048 2022

  44. [44]

    E., Cui, B., Subotnik, J

    Li, T. E., Cui, B., Subotnik, J. E. & Nitzan, A. Molecular Polaritonics: Chemical Dynamics Under Strong Light–Matter Coupling.Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.73, 43–71, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-090519-042621 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-090519-042621 2022

  45. [45]

    & Rife, J

    Nithianandam, J. & Rife, J. C. Synchrotron x-ray optical properties of natural diamond.Phys. Rev. B47, 3517–3521, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.3517 (1993)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.47.3517 1993

  46. [46]

    Blum, V .et al.Ab initio molecular simulations with numeric atom-centered orbitals.Comput. Phys. Commun.180, 2175–2196, DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2009.06.022 (2009)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2009.06.022 2009

  47. [47]

    Phys.14, 053020, DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/14/5/053020 (2012)

    Ren, X.et al.Resolution-of-identity approach to Hartree–Fock, hybrid density functionals, RPA, MP2 andGWwith numeric atom-centered orbital basis functions.New J. Phys.14, 053020, DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/14/5/053020 (2012)

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/5/053020 2012

  48. [48]

    Heyd, J., Scuseria, G. E. & Ernzerhof, M. Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential.The J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207–8215, DOI: 10.1063/1.1564060 (2003)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1564060 2003

  49. [49]

    & Berthold, A

    Schülke, W., Bonse, U., Nagasawa, H., Kaprolat, A. & Berthold, A. Interband transitions and core excitation in highly oriented pyrolytic graphite studied by inelastic synchrotron x-ray scattering: Band-structure information.Phys. Rev. B38, 2112–2123, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.2112 (1988)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.38.2112 1988

  50. [50]

    L., Nicholls, R

    McDougall, N. L., Nicholls, R. J., Partridge, J. G. & McCulloch, D. G. The Near Edge Structure of Hexagonal Boron Nitride.Microsc. Microanal.20, 1053–1059, DOI: 10.1017/S1431927614000737 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1017/s1431927614000737 2014

  51. [51]

    & Gullikson, E

    Soufli, R. & Gullikson, E. M. Reflectance measurements on clean surfaces for the determination of optical constants of silicon in the extreme ultraviolet–soft-x-ray region.Appl. Opt.36, 5499, DOI: 10.1364/AO.36.005499 (1997)

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.36.005499 1997

  52. [52]

    M.et al.Actinic inspection of the extreme ultraviolet optical parameters of lithographic materials enabled by a table-top, coherent extreme ultraviolet source.J

    Dorney, K. M.et al.Actinic inspection of the extreme ultraviolet optical parameters of lithographic materials enabled by a table-top, coherent extreme ultraviolet source.J. Micro/Nanopatterning, Materials, Metrol.23, DOI: 10.1117/1.JMM.23.4. 041406 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jmm.23.4 2024

  53. [53]

    & Pert, G

    Tallents, G., Wagenaars, E. & Pert, G. Lithography at EUV wavelengths.Nat. Photonics4, 809–811, DOI: 10.1038/ nphoton.2010.277 (2010). 59.Wagner, C. & Harned, N. Lithography gets extreme.Nat. Photonics4, 24–26, DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.251 (2010)

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.251 2010

  54. [54]

    Opt.61, 2060, DOI: 10.1364/AO

    Ciesielski, R.et al.Determination of optical constants of thin films in the EUV.Appl. Opt.61, 2060, DOI: 10.1364/AO. 447152 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1364/ao 2060

  55. [55]

    90481I, DOI: 10.1117/12

    Tarrio, C.et al.Improved measurement capabilities at the NIST EUV reflectometry facility. 90481I, DOI: 10.1117/12. 2046290 (San Jose, California, United States, 2014)

    work page doi:10.1117/12 2014

  56. [56]

    Sokolov, A.et al.At-wavelength metrology facility for soft X-ray reflection optics.Rev. Sci. Instruments87, 052005, DOI: 10.1063/1.4950731 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4950731 2016

  57. [57]

    & Scholze, F

    Laubis, C., Haase, A., Soltwisch, V . & Scholze, F. Characterization of optical material parameters for EUV Lithography applications at PTB. 96610W, DOI: 10.1117/12.2195009 (Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2015). Acknowledgements We acknowledge the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) for provision of synchrotron radiation facilities under proposal numb...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2195009 2015