pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.02693 · v1 · pith:XOWNMZO4new · submitted 2026-06-01 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th· nucl-th

Stochastic Dynamics of Heavy Quarks in Strongly Coupled Plasma

Krishna Rajagopal , Bruno Scheihing-Hitschfeld , Urs Achim Wiedemann This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 13:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-thnucl-th
keywords heavy quarksKolmogorov equationstochastic dynamicsstrongly coupled plasmakinetic equilibrationN=4 SYMFokker-Planckjet quenching
0
0 comments X

The pith

Heavy quark equilibration at large momenta is delayed under Kolmogorov evolution compared to Fokker-Planck.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that the stochastic evolution of heavy quark momenta through a strongly coupled plasma follows the Kolmogorov equation rather than the usual Fokker-Planck approximation. The Kolmogorov description captures non-Gaussian momentum fluctuations and leads to slower approach to equilibrium at high momenta because rare events with little momentum loss become more probable when the distribution falls steeply. A sympathetic reader would care because heavy quarks serve as probes of the quark-gluon plasma in heavy-ion collisions, and the choice of evolution equation affects how their energy loss is interpreted. The authors map the problem in the heavy-quark limit to a Hamilton-Jacobi equation that reduces to first-order ordinary differential equations, which they solve for constant-temperature infinite plasma and spherically symmetric initial conditions. Direct comparison reveals similar behavior at low momentum but markedly slower equilibration at high momentum under Kolmogorov dynamics.

Core claim

The evolution of the momentum space distribution function can be reformulated as a Hamilton-Jacobi problem and solved via first-order ordinary differential equations. When compared with Fokker-Planck dynamics that share the same drag coefficient, Kolmogorov evolution produces qualitatively similar dynamics at small momentum but very different dynamics at large momentum; equilibration at large momentum is significantly delayed because events in which a heavy quark loses little momentum are much less unlikely than in Fokker-Planck evolution with the same mean energy loss.

What carries the argument

The Kolmogorov equation, which governs the full probability distribution of momentum changes for heavy quarks without assuming Gaussian fluctuations.

If this is right

  • Heavy quarks can be followed from the ultra-relativistic to the non-relativistic regime within a single consistent framework.
  • Equilibration at large momentum takes longer under Kolmogorov dynamics than under Fokker-Planck dynamics with identical mean energy loss.
  • At small momentum the two descriptions remain qualitatively similar.
  • The method supplies a route to including these dynamics in phenomenological models of heavy-ion collisions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Phenomenological jet-quenching calculations that rely on Fokker-Planck evolution may therefore overestimate the rate at which high-momentum heavy quarks reach equilibrium.
  • Incorporating the full Kolmogorov evolution into hydrodynamic simulations could change predictions for heavy-flavor observables at high transverse momentum.
  • Determining the actual spectrum of momentum fluctuations from microscopic calculations would test whether the reported delay persists beyond the constant-temperature infinite-plasma setup.

Load-bearing premise

The Fokker-Planck comparison uses fluctuations chosen by hand to guarantee equilibration rather than deriving them from the underlying plasma dynamics.

What would settle it

A measurement of the high-momentum tail of heavy-quark distributions in heavy-ion collisions that shows slower decay than Fokker-Planck predictions with equivalent average energy loss would support the claim.

read the original abstract

We study the stochastic dynamics of heavy quarks propagating through the strongly coupled plasma of $\mathcal{N}=4$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills (SYM) theory at nonzero temperature in terms of the corresponding Kolmogorov equation, which correctly describes their kinetic equilibration and the non-Gaussian fluctuations in their momenta without having to restrict their velocity to the non-relativistic regime. Leveraging the heavy quark limit, we show that the evolution of the momentum space distribution function can be reformulated as a Hamilton-Jacobi problem, and therefore can be solved in terms of first-order ordinary differential equations. We solve these evolution equations in an infinite thermal plasma with a constant temperature for initial conditions specified by spherically symmetric heavy quark momentum distributions with a phenomenologically motivated shape that is steeply falling at large momentum. To highlight the distinctive features of the kinetic equilibration process, we compare their solutions with Fokker-Planck dynamics with the same drag coefficient and fluctuations chosen by hand to guarantee equilibration. We find qualitatively similar dynamics at small momentum, and very different dynamics at large momentum, where, much like in jet quenching phenomena, the steepness of the momentum distribution gives a larger relevance to unlikely events in which a heavy quark loses little momentum in a given time step. Such events are much less unlikely in the Kolmogorov evolution than in Fokker-Planck evolution with the same mean energy loss, meaning that equilibration at large momentum is significantly delayed. Our results provide a systematic description of heavy quarks propagating through strongly coupled plasma from the ultra-relativistic to the non-relativistic regime and point the way towards implementation in phenomenological studies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the stochastic dynamics of heavy quarks in strongly coupled N=4 SYM plasma are described by the Kolmogorov equation, which is reformulated in the heavy-quark limit as a Hamilton-Jacobi problem solvable via first-order ODEs. For steeply falling initial momentum distributions in an infinite constant-T plasma, the solutions show qualitatively similar behavior to Fokker-Planck evolution at small momentum but significantly delayed equilibration at large momentum, because rare small-momentum-loss events are less suppressed in the Kolmogorov dynamics than in FP evolution with the same mean drag but hand-chosen fluctuations.

Significance. If the central comparison holds, the work provides a systematic treatment of heavy-quark kinetic equilibration across relativistic regimes and identifies the role of non-Gaussian fluctuations in delaying large-momentum thermalization, with potential implications for jet quenching phenomenology. The reformulation of the Kolmogorov evolution into first-order ODEs is a technical strength that enables explicit solutions without velocity restrictions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (comparison paragraph): The Fokker-Planck benchmark employs fluctuations 'chosen by hand to guarantee equilibration' while matching only the drag coefficient. Because the Kolmogorov kernel is fixed by the heavy-quark limit of N=4 SYM correlators, the diffusion coefficients in the FP comparison should be derived from the same underlying dynamics; the ad-hoc choice directly controls the relative probability of rare small-loss trajectories that drive the reported delay, rendering the headline result sensitive to this modeling choice rather than a robust prediction of the SYM theory.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and the model setup: The plasma is taken to be infinite with constant temperature, eliminating any back-reaction or expansion-induced correlation between drag and diffusion. This idealization is load-bearing for the large-momentum claim, as a realistic expanding medium could alter the fluctuation spectrum and the relative weight of unlikely trajectories.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'phenomenologically motivated shape' for the initial distribution without specifying the functional form or parameters; a brief explicit definition would aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We respond to each major comment below, indicating where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (comparison paragraph): The Fokker-Planck benchmark employs fluctuations 'chosen by hand to guarantee equilibration' while matching only the drag coefficient. Because the Kolmogorov kernel is fixed by the heavy-quark limit of N=4 SYM correlators, the diffusion coefficients in the FP comparison should be derived from the same underlying dynamics; the ad-hoc choice directly controls the relative probability of rare small-loss trajectories that drive the reported delay, rendering the headline result sensitive to this modeling choice rather than a robust prediction of the SYM theory.

    Authors: The Fokker-Planck comparison is introduced to contrast the non-Gaussian momentum-loss kernel fixed by the SYM heavy-quark limit against the Gaussian approximation that is standard in the literature. The FP diffusion is chosen to enforce the correct thermal equilibrium for the matched drag coefficient, which is the conventional way to set up such a benchmark while isolating the effect of the fluctuation spectrum. We agree that a direct extraction of FP coefficients from the same SYM correlators (in the small-transfer limit) would make the comparison more tightly controlled; the current choice is not intended as a prediction from SYM but as a reference point. We will revise the abstract and the relevant methods paragraph to state explicitly that the FP diffusion is fixed by the equilibrium condition and to note the approximation involved. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and the model setup: The plasma is taken to be infinite with constant temperature, eliminating any back-reaction or expansion-induced correlation between drag and diffusion. This idealization is load-bearing for the large-momentum claim, as a realistic expanding medium could alter the fluctuation spectrum and the relative weight of unlikely trajectories.

    Authors: The constant-temperature, infinite-volume setup is chosen deliberately to isolate the stochastic dynamics and to permit the exact Hamilton-Jacobi reduction to first-order ODEs. This controlled environment makes the role of rare small-loss events transparent. While we recognize that hydrodynamic expansion would introduce time-dependent correlations between drag and diffusion, such effects lie outside the present scope; the reported delay is a property of the SYM-derived kernel under the stated conditions. We will add a short discussion paragraph in the conclusions that outlines how expansion could modify the relative weight of unlikely trajectories and that flags this as a direction for future work. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation and comparison are self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives the Kolmogorov equation from the heavy-quark limit of N=4 SYM, reformulates the evolution as a Hamilton-Jacobi problem solvable by ODEs, and solves it for given initial conditions. It then compares the resulting dynamics to an independently constructed Fokker-Planck model whose fluctuations are explicitly stated to be chosen by hand (not derived from the same SYM correlators). No equation reduces to its own inputs by construction, no self-citation chain is load-bearing for the central claim, and the reported difference in large-momentum equilibration follows directly from the explicit numerical comparison of the two dynamics. The ad-hoc nature of the FP fluctuations is acknowledged in the paper itself and does not create a circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach relies on the heavy quark approximation and the choice of initial conditions; no new entities postulated. Only abstract available so ledger is inferred from stated assumptions.

free parameters (2)
  • initial momentum distribution shape
    Spherically symmetric with steeply falling at large momentum, phenomenologically motivated.
  • drag coefficient
    Used in both models for comparison.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Heavy quark limit allows reformulation as Hamilton-Jacobi problem
    Stated in abstract as leveraging the heavy quark limit.
  • domain assumption N=4 SYM plasma at nonzero temperature models strongly coupled QGP
    Standard modeling choice in the field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5820 in / 1343 out tokens · 30701 ms · 2026-06-28T13:26:45.374886+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Lindbladian for holographic Brownian motion

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Derives and analyzes a Lindbladian for holographic Brownian motion in BTZ and AdS5 black brane backgrounds from the influence functional.

  2. Momentum Dependence of Heavy Quark Diffusion in a Thermal Gluonic Plasma on the Lattice

    hep-lat 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A lattice QCD method is proposed to compute the momentum dependence of heavy quark drag and diffusion coefficients in a thermal gluonic plasma.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 53 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Rapp and H

    R. Rapp and H. van Hees,Heavy Quarks in the Quark-Gluon Plasma, pp. 111–206, 2010. arXiv:0903.1096

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  2. [2]

    Andronic et al.,Heavy-flavour and quarkonium production in the LHC era: from proton–proton to heavy-ion collisions,Eur

    A. Andronic et al.,Heavy-flavour and quarkonium production in the LHC era: from proton–proton to heavy-ion collisions,Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016), no. 3 107, [arXiv:1506.03981]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    Aarts et al.,Heavy-flavor production and medium properties in high-energy nuclear collisions - What next?,Eur

    G. Aarts et al.,Heavy-flavor production and medium properties in high-energy nuclear collisions - What next?,Eur. Phys. J. A53(2017), no. 5 93, [arXiv:1612.08032]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    Prino and R

    F. Prino and R. Rapp,Open Heavy Flavor in QCD Matter and in Nuclear Collisions,J. Phys. G43(2016), no. 9 093002, [arXiv:1603.00529]. – 64 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Beraudo et al.,Extraction of Heavy-Flavor Transport Coefficients in QCD Matter,Nucl

    A. Beraudo et al.,Extraction of Heavy-Flavor Transport Coefficients in QCD Matter,Nucl. Phys. A979(2018) 21–86, [arXiv:1803.03824]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    Cao et al.,Toward the determination of heavy-quark transport coefficients in quark-gluon plasma,Phys

    S. Cao et al.,Toward the determination of heavy-quark transport coefficients in quark-gluon plasma,Phys. Rev. C99(2019), no. 5 054907, [arXiv:1809.07894]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    Dong, Y.-J

    X. Dong, Y.-J. Lee, and R. Rapp,Open Heavy-Flavor Production in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.69(2019) 417–445, [arXiv:1903.07709]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Apolinário, Y.-J

    L. Apolinário, Y.-J. Lee, and M. Winn,Heavy quarks and jets as probes of the QGP,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.127(2022) 103990, [arXiv:2203.16352]. [9]PHENIXCollaboration, A. Adare et al.,Energy Loss and Flow of Heavy Quarks in Au+Au Collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV,Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 172301, [nucl-ex/0611018]. [10]PHENIXCollaboration, A. Adare et al....

    arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    Svetitsky,Diffusion of charmed quarks in the quark-gluon plasma,Phys

    B. Svetitsky,Diffusion of charmed quarks in the quark-gluon plasma,Phys. Rev. D37(1988) 2484–2491

    1988

  10. [10]

    G. D. Moore and D. Teaney,How much do heavy quarks thermalize in a heavy ion collision?, Phys. Rev. C71(2005) 064904, [hep-ph/0412346]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  11. [11]

    van Hees and R

    H. van Hees and R. Rapp,Thermalization of heavy quarks in the quark-gluon plasma,Phys. Rev. C71(2005) 034907, [nucl-th/0412015]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  12. [12]

    van Hees, V

    H. van Hees, V. Greco, and R. Rapp,Heavy-quark probes of the quark-gluon plasma at RHIC, Phys. Rev. C73(2006) 034913, [nucl-th/0508055]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  13. [13]

    van Hees, M

    H. van Hees, M. Mannarelli, V. Greco, and R. Rapp,Nonperturbative heavy-quark diffusion in the quark-gluon plasma,Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 192301, [arXiv:0709.2884]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  14. [14]

    Y. Xu, J. E. Bernhard, S. A. Bass, M. Nahrgang, and S. Cao,Data-driven analysis for the temperature and momentum dependence of the heavy-quark diffusion coefficient in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,Phys. Rev. C97(2018), no. 1 014907, [arXiv:1710.00807]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    M. He, R. J. Fries, and R. Rapp,Heavy-Quark Diffusion and Hadronization in Quark-Gluon Plasma,Phys. Rev. C86(2012) 014903, [arXiv:1106.6006]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  16. [16]

    Cao, G.-Y

    S. Cao, G.-Y. Qin, and S. A. Bass,Heavy-quark dynamics and hadronization in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions: Collisional versus radiative energy loss,Phys. Rev. C88(2013) 044907, [arXiv:1308.0617]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  17. [17]

    S. K. Das, F. Scardina, S. Plumari, and V. Greco,Heavy-flavor in-medium momentum evolution: Langevin versus Boltzmann approach,Phys. Rev. C90(2014) 044901, [arXiv:1312.6857]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  18. [18]

    Berrehrah, P

    H. Berrehrah, P. B. Gossiaux, J. Aichelin, W. Cassing, J. M. Torres-Rincon, and E. Bratkovskaya,Transport coefficients of heavy quarks aroundTc at finite quark chemical potential,Phys. Rev. C90(2014) 051901, [arXiv:1406.5322]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  19. [19]

    Xu et al.,Resolving discrepancies in the estimation of heavy quark transport coefficients in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,Phys

    Y. Xu et al.,Resolving discrepancies in the estimation of heavy quark transport coefficients in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,Phys. Rev. C99(2019), no. 1 014902, [arXiv:1809.10734]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    P. B. Gossiaux,Open Heavy Flavors in Nuclear Collisions: Theory Overview,Nucl. Phys. A 982(2019) 113–119, [arXiv:1901.01606]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    Andronic et al.,Comparative study of quarkonium transport in hot QCD matter,Eur

    A. Andronic et al.,Comparative study of quarkonium transport in hot QCD matter,Eur. Phys. J. A60(2024), no. 4 88, [arXiv:2402.04366]

    arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Krishna, R

    T. Krishna, R. Rapp, Y. Fu, S. A. Bass, and W. Ke,Nonperturbative heavy-flavor transport approach for hot QCD matter,Phys. Lett. B871(2025) 139999, [arXiv:2509.13881]

    arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Beraudo, J

    A. Beraudo, J. F. Du Plessis, D. Pablos, and K. Rajagopal,Heavy Quark Energy Loss in the Hybrid Model,arXiv:2510.24847

    arXiv

  24. [24]

    Burnier, M

    Y. Burnier, M. Laine, J. Langelage, and L. Mether,Colour-electric spectral function at next-to-leading order,JHEP08(2010) 094, [arXiv:1006.0867]. – 67 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  25. [25]

    A. M. Eller, J. Ghiglieri, and G. D. Moore,Thermal Heavy Quark Self-Energy from Euclidean Correlators,Phys. Rev. D99(2019), no. 9 094042, [arXiv:1903.08064]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 102, 039901 (2020)]

    arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    Scheihing-Hitschfeld and X

    B. Scheihing-Hitschfeld and X. Yao,Gauge Invariance of Non-Abelian Field Strength Correlators: The Axial Gauge Puzzle,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023), no. 5 052302, [arXiv:2205.04477]

    arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Scheihing-Hitschfeld and X

    B. Scheihing-Hitschfeld and X. Yao,Real time quarkonium transport coefficients in open quantum systems from Euclidean QCD,Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 5 054024, [arXiv:2306.13127]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 109, 099902 (2024)]

    arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    de la Cruz, A

    D. de la Cruz, A. M. Eller, and G. D. Moore,QCD field-strength correlators on a Polyakov loop with gradient flow at next-to-leading order,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 9 094057, [arXiv:2410.01578]

    arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Caron-Huot and G

    S. Caron-Huot and G. D. Moore,Heavy quark diffusion in perturbative QCD at next-to-leading order,Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 052301, [arXiv:0708.4232]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  30. [30]

    Caron-Huot and G

    S. Caron-Huot and G. D. Moore,Heavy quark diffusion in QCD and N=4 SYM at next-to-leading order,JHEP02(2008) 081, [arXiv:0801.2173]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  31. [31]

    Petreczky and D

    P. Petreczky and D. Teaney,Heavy quark diffusion from the lattice,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 014508, [hep-ph/0507318]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  32. [32]

    Caron-Huot, M

    S. Caron-Huot, M. Laine, and G. D. Moore,A Way to estimate the heavy quark thermalization rate from the lattice,JHEP04(2009) 053, [arXiv:0901.1195]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  33. [33]

    H. B. Meyer,Transport Properties of the Quark-Gluon Plasma: A Lattice QCD Perspective, Eur. Phys. J. A47(2011) 86, [arXiv:1104.3708]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  34. [34]

    Banerjee, S

    D. Banerjee, S. Datta, R. Gavai, and P. Majumdar,Heavy Quark Momentum Diffusion Coefficient from Lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 014510, [arXiv:1109.5738]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  35. [35]

    Francis, O

    A. Francis, O. Kaczmarek, M. Laine, T. Neuhaus, and H. Ohno,Nonperturbative estimate of the heavy quark momentum diffusion coefficient,Phys. Rev. D92(2015), no. 11 116003, [arXiv:1508.04543]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  36. [36]

    Brambilla, V

    N. Brambilla, V. Leino, P. Petreczky, and A. Vairo,Lattice QCD constraints on the heavy quark diffusion coefficient,Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 7 074503, [arXiv:2007.10078]. [64]TUMQCDCollaboration, N. Brambilla, V. Leino, J. Mayer-Steudte, and P. Petreczky,Heavy quark diffusion coefficient with gradient flow,Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 5 054508, [arXiv:220...

    arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Casalderrey-Solana and D

    J. Casalderrey-Solana and D. Teaney,Heavy quark diffusion in strongly coupled N=4 Yang-Mills,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 085012, [hep-ph/0605199]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  38. [38]

    S. S. Gubser,Momentum fluctuations of heavy quarks in the gauge-string duality,Nucl. Phys. B790(2008) 175–199, [hep-th/0612143]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  39. [39]

    Casalderrey-Solana and D

    J. Casalderrey-Solana and D. Teaney,Transverse Momentum Broadening of a Fast Quark in a N=4 Yang Mills Plasma,JHEP04(2007) 039, [hep-th/0701123]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  40. [40]

    Casalderrey-Solana, H

    J. Casalderrey-Solana, H. Liu, D. Mateos, K. Rajagopal, and U. Achim Wiedemann, Gauge/String Duality, Hot QCD and Heavy Ion Collisions. Cambridge University Press, 2014

    2014

  41. [41]

    Rajagopal, B

    K. Rajagopal, B. Scheihing-Hitschfeld, and U. A. Wiedemann,Dynamics of heavy quarks in strongly coupledN= 4 SYM plasma,JHEP07(2025) 013, [arXiv:2501.06289]

    arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Rajagopal, B

    K. Rajagopal, B. Scheihing-Hitschfeld, and U. A. Wiedemann,Universal Equilibration Condition for Heavy Quarks,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025), no. 24 242301, [arXiv:2504.21139]

    arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Akamatsu, T

    Y. Akamatsu, T. Hatsuda, and T. Hirano,Heavy Quark Diffusion with Relativistic Langevin Dynamics in the Quark-Gluon Fluid,Phys. Rev. C79(2009) 054907, [arXiv:0809.1499]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  44. [44]

    Beraudo, A

    A. Beraudo, A. De Pace, W. M. Alberico, and A. Molinari,Transport properties and Langevin dynamics of heavy quarks and quarkonia in the Quark Gluon Plasma,Nucl. Phys. A831 (2009) 59–90, [arXiv:0902.0741]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  45. [45]

    M. He, H. van Hees, P. B. Gossiaux, R. J. Fries, and R. Rapp,Relativistic Langevin Dynamics in Expanding Media,Phys. Rev. E88(2013) 032138, [arXiv:1305.1425]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  46. [46]

    J. F. Du Plessis and B. Scheihing-Hitschfeld,Heavy Quark Transport is Non-Gaussian Beyond Leading Log,arXiv:2604.21895

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    P. B. Gossiaux and J. Aichelin,Towards an understanding of the RHIC single electron data, Phys. Rev. C78(2008) 014904, [arXiv:0802.2525]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  48. [48]

    Uphoff, O

    J. Uphoff, O. Fochler, Z. Xu, and C. Greiner,Elastic and radiative heavy quark interactions in ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions,J. Phys. G42(2015), no. 11 115106, [arXiv:1408.2964]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  49. [49]

    S. Cao, T. Luo, G.-Y. Qin, and X.-N. Wang,Linearized Boltzmann transport model for jet propagation in the quark-gluon plasma: Heavy quark evolution,Phys. Rev. C94(2016), no. 1 014909, [arXiv:1605.06447]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    S. Li, C. Wang, R. Wan, and J. Liao,Probing the transport properties of Quark-Gluon Plasma via heavy-flavor Boltzmann and Langevin dynamics,Phys. Rev. C99(2019), no. 5 054909, [arXiv:1901.04600]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    Liu, W.-J

    F.-L. Liu, W.-J. Xing, X.-Y. Wu, G.-Y. Qin, S. Cao, and X.-N. Wang,QLBT: a linear Boltzmann transport model for heavy quarks in a quark-gluon plasma of quasi-particles,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022), no. 4 350, [arXiv:2107.11713]

    arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    H. Liu, K. Rajagopal, and U. A. Wiedemann,Wilson loops in heavy ion collisions and their calculation in AdS/CFT,JHEP03(2007) 066, [hep-ph/0612168]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  53. [53]

    Bitaghsir Fadafan, H

    K. Bitaghsir Fadafan, H. Liu, K. Rajagopal, and U. A. Wiedemann,Stirring Strongly Coupled Plasma,Eur. Phys. J. C61(2009) 553–567, [arXiv:0809.2869]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  54. [54]

    Chernicoff and A

    M. Chernicoff and A. Guijosa,Acceleration, Energy Loss and Screening in Strongly-Coupled Gauge Theories,JHEP06(2008) 005, [arXiv:0803.3070]. – 69 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  55. [55]

    C. P. Herzog, A. Karch, P. Kovtun, C. Kozcaz, and L. G. Yaffe,Energy loss of a heavy quark moving through N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma,JHEP07(2006) 013, [hep-th/0605158]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  56. [56]

    S. S. Gubser,Drag force in AdS/CFT,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 126005, [hep-th/0605182]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  57. [57]

    Georgi,An Effective Field Theory for Heavy Quarks at Low-energies,Phys

    H. Georgi,An Effective Field Theory for Heavy Quarks at Low-energies,Phys. Lett. B240 (1990) 447–450

    1990

  58. [58]

    P. M. Chesler and K. Rajagopal,Jet quenching in strongly coupled plasma,Phys. Rev. D90 (2014), no. 2 025033, [arXiv:1402.6756]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  59. [59]

    P. M. Chesler and K. Rajagopal,On the Evolution of Jet Energy and Opening Angle in Strongly Coupled Plasma,JHEP05(2016) 098, [arXiv:1511.07567]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  60. [60]

    Baier, Y

    R. Baier, Y. L. Dokshitzer, A. H. Mueller, and D. Schiff,Quenching of hadron spectra in media,JHEP09(2001) 033, [hep-ph/0106347]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  61. [61]

    W. A. Horowitz,Fluctuating heavy quark energy loss in a strongly coupled quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D91(2015), no. 8 085019, [arXiv:1501.04693]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  62. [62]

    Mateos, R

    D. Mateos, R. C. Myers, and R. M. Thomson,Thermodynamics of the brane,JHEP05(2007) 067, [hep-th/0701132]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  63. [63]

    Mikhailov,Nonlinear waves in AdS / CFT correspondence,hep-th/0305196

    A. Mikhailov,Nonlinear waves in AdS / CFT correspondence,hep-th/0305196

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    Cacciari, M

    M. Cacciari, M. Greco, and P. Nason,ThepT spectrum in heavy-flavour hadroproduction., JHEP05(1998) 007, [hep-ph/9803400]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  65. [65]

    Cacciari, S

    M. Cacciari, S. Frixione, and P. Nason,The p(T) spectrum in heavy flavor photoproduction, JHEP03(2001) 006, [hep-ph/0102134]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  66. [66]

    Cacciari, S

    M. Cacciari, S. Frixione, N. Houdeau, M. L. Mangano, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi,Theoretical predictions for charm and bottom production at the LHC,JHEP10(2012) 137, [arXiv:1205.6344]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  67. [67]

    Cacciari, M

    M. Cacciari, M. L. Mangano, and P. Nason,Gluon PDF constraints from the ratio of forward heavy-quark production at the LHC at √ S= 7and 13 TeV,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015), no. 12 610, [arXiv:1507.06197]. [98]NNPDFCollaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions for the LHC Run II,JHEP04 (2015) 040, [arXiv:1410.8849]. [99]ALICECollaboration, S. Acharya et...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  68. [68]

    Casalderrey-Solana, D

    J. Casalderrey-Solana, D. C. Gulhan, J. G. Milhano, D. Pablos, and K. Rajagopal,A Hybrid Strong/Weak Coupling Approach to Jet Quenching,JHEP10(2014) 019, [arXiv:1405.3864]. [Erratum: JHEP 09, 175 (2015)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  69. [69]

    Casalderrey-Solana, Z

    J. Casalderrey-Solana, Z. Hulcher, G. Milhano, D. Pablos, and K. Rajagopal,Simultaneous description of hadron and jet suppression in heavy-ion collisions,Phys. Rev. C99(2019), no. 5 051901, [arXiv:1808.07386]. – 70 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019