pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.03729 · v1 · pith:Z6AZF4P3new · submitted 2026-06-02 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc

Constraining Scale-Dependent Growth in f(R) Gravity with Future 21 cm Surveys

Apurba Samanta , Bhuwan Joshi , Jess Worsley , Peter Dunsby , Saikat Chakraborty This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 08:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords f(R) gravity21 cm surveysgrowth indexscale-dependent growthHI biasmodified gravitycosmic accelerationintensity mapping
0
0 comments X

The pith

Future 21 cm surveys can constrain the scale-dependent growth index in f(R) gravity models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines whether upcoming 21 cm intensity mapping surveys can measure the growth of cosmic structure in modified gravity theories known as f(R). In these models the growth rate changes with the scale of observation and with time, unlike in standard cosmology. By forecasting the precision on the growth index and on the product of neutral hydrogen bias and growth rate, the authors show that such surveys can give moderate but useful limits on f(R) scenarios that produce late-time acceleration without a separate dark energy field. This matters because recent data have hinted that dark energy may not be a simple constant, so independent tests from structure growth are needed to decide between explanations.

Core claim

In f(R) gravity the linear matter density contrast evolves in a scale-dependent way, so the growth index becomes a function of both wavenumber and redshift. Viable f(R) models reproduce LambdaCDM at high redshift yet drive acceleration at late times. Forthcoming 21 cm surveys can measure this scale-dependent growth index together with the combined HI bias and growth-rate parameter, thereby supplying moderate constraints that support these modified gravity models.

What carries the argument

The scale-dependent growth index gamma(k,z) in f(R) gravity, extracted from 21 cm power spectrum measurements of the HI bias-growth-rate product.

If this is right

  • The growth index can be measured at different scales to test for scale dependence predicted by f(R).
  • Moderate constraints on viable f(R) functional forms become possible from the data.
  • The combined HI bias and growth-rate parameter can be jointly constrained alongside the growth index.
  • 21 cm observations provide an independent probe of late-time acceleration in modified gravity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Combining 21 cm constraints with galaxy surveys such as DESI could produce tighter limits on f(R) parameters.
  • The forecasts assume a particular form for the f(R) model; relaxing that assumption would require checking whether the extraction remains stable.
  • If unmodeled systematics in the 21 cm signal prove larger than expected, the moderate support claimed for modified gravity would weaken.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the scale-dependent growth index and combined HI bias-growth-rate parameter can be extracted from 21 cm data without being dominated by unmodeled systematics or by the specific choice of f(R) functional form.

What would settle it

A measurement showing the growth index is constant with scale and matches general relativity within survey errors would falsify the claim that 21 cm data supports f(R) scenarios.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.03729 by Apurba Samanta, Bhuwan Joshi, Jess Worsley, Peter Dunsby, Saikat Chakraborty.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Evolution of the transition redshift (solid blue line) under the quasi￾static approximation, given the initial conditions in equation (13). This curve delineates the GR (blue) and 𝑓 (𝑅) gravity (light orange) regimes. At 𝑧 = 0, the transition occurs at a Fourier wave number 𝑘0 ≃ 0.031 Mpc−1 . Dotted lines highlight specific scales at 𝑘 = 0.01 Mpc−1 (grey), 0.05 Mpc−1 (green), and 0.1 Mpc−1 (red), which are… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: In these plots, we show the evolution of different modes and the variation of the growth index within the full quasi-static approximation (9) using the initial conditions discussed above. The plots also highlight the relevant modes probed by 21 cm surveys, which are important for understanding the modes responsible for galaxy formation. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 z 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 D(z) k = 0.012 Mpc 1 k = 0.034 Mpc… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: In these plots, we show the evolution of different modes and the variation of the growth index within the exact equation (8) using the initial conditions discussed above. The plots also highlight the relevant modes probed by 21 cm surveys, which are important for understanding the modes responsible for galaxy formation. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 z 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 |(D(z)e x a ct D(z)full)| × 1 0 0 k = 0.012… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Absolute percentage difference between the exact solutions and the full QS (solid) solutions for: (a) the normalised perturbation D(z), and (b) the growth index, 𝛾(𝑘, 𝑧). MNRAS 000, 1–9 (2026) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Relative percentage difference between the exact solutions and the full QS (solid) solutions for: (a) the normalised perturbation D(z), and (b) the growth index, 𝛾(𝑘, 𝑧). (21) Here the system temperature 𝑇sys is taken from Bacon et al. (2020), 𝜒 and 𝐻(𝑧) are respectively the co-moving distance and Hubble param￾eter. For SKA-Mid, which is the only SD mode survey considered in this paper, we take efficiency … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Relative error of the full QS approximation across different Fourier scales. Panels (b,c,e,f) illustrate the 𝑓 (𝑅) regime (𝑘 = 0.05 and 0.1 Mpc−1 ), where the relative error deviates significantly from the GR prediction. Panels (a,d) represent the GR-dominated regime, showing nearly identical relative errors and confirming theoretical consistency with survey expectations on these scales. These results rema… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Relative error of the Exact equation across different Fourier scales. Panels (b,c,e,f) illustrate the 𝑓 (𝑅) regime (𝑘 = 0.05 and 0.1 Mpc−1 ), where the relative error deviates significantly from the GR prediction. Panels (a,d) represent the GR-dominated regime, showing nearly identical relative errors and confirming theoretical consistency with survey expectations on these scales. These results remain cons… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent observations, particularly from DESI, have provided intriguing hints of dynamical behaviour in late-time dark energy. Modified gravity theories offer a compelling framework for interpreting such phenomena, with $f(R)$ gravity emerging as one of the most extensively studied examples. A central challenge in these models, however, lies in determining the precise functional form of $f(R)$. Nevertheless, several viable models have been proposed that successfully reproduce the standard $\Lambda$CDM cosmology at high red shifts while generating late-time cosmic acceleration without an explicit dark energy component. Within this framework, the evolution of the linear matter density contrast becomes scale dependent, leading to a growth index that varies with both scale and redshift. In this work, we explore the capability of forthcoming 21 cm observations to constrain the growth index, as well as the combined neutral hydrogen (HI) bias and growth-rate parameter. Our results indicate that future 21 cm surveys can provide meaningful, though moderate, support for these modified gravity scenarios.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript forecasts the ability of future 21 cm intensity-mapping surveys to constrain the scale-dependent growth index γ(k,z) in viable f(R) gravity models (which reproduce ΛCDM at high redshift while driving late-time acceleration) together with the combined HI bias–growth-rate parameter. It concludes that these surveys can deliver meaningful though moderate support for the modified-gravity scenarios relative to GR.

Significance. If the forecast assumptions prove robust, the work would usefully inform survey design for testing gravity on cosmological scales with intensity mapping. The identification of scale dependence in the growth index as a distinguishing feature of f(R) is correctly noted. The result remains a forecast rather than a data-driven constraint, so its significance is moderate and contingent on the realism of the covariance modeling and systematics treatment.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Fisher-matrix setup): the central claim that γ(k,z) and the HI bias–growth-rate combination can be recovered with errors small enough to yield moderate support for f(R) rests on the unquantified assumption that foreground residuals, instrumental noise, and nonlinear bias evolution remain sub-dominant at the relevant k and z; no explicit error budget or end-to-end simulation is shown to demonstrate that these systematics do not inflate the forecasted errors by the factors of 2–5 commonly reported in 21 cm literature.
  2. [§4] §4 (results and model comparison): the statement that results are insensitive to the specific f(R) functional form is not demonstrated; the growth-index parametrization is introduced as a fitted function of scale and redshift, so the claimed support for f(R) over GR may depend on the chosen parametrization and on the particular f(R) model used to generate the mock data.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the combined HI bias–growth-rate parameter is introduced without an explicit equation; adding a numbered definition would improve clarity.
  2. Figure captions should state the exact survey specifications (redshift range, k-range, noise model) used for each forecast curve.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address the two major comments point by point below, indicating the revisions that will be incorporated in the next version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Fisher-matrix setup): the central claim that γ(k,z) and the HI bias–growth-rate combination can be recovered with errors small enough to yield moderate support for f(R) rests on the unquantified assumption that foreground residuals, instrumental noise, and nonlinear bias evolution remain sub-dominant at the relevant k and z; no explicit error budget or end-to-end simulation is shown to demonstrate that these systematics do not inflate the forecasted errors by the factors of 2–5 commonly reported in 21 cm literature.

    Authors: We agree that the Fisher-matrix analysis is performed under the assumption that the listed systematics remain sub-dominant and that no explicit error budget or end-to-end simulation is provided. This is a standard limitation of many forecast papers, but the referee is correct that it should be stated more explicitly. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection in §3 that (i) summarizes the dominant 21 cm systematics, (ii) cites the literature reporting typical error inflation factors, and (iii) clarifies that the quoted constraints represent the statistical floor under idealized conditions. We will also add a short paragraph in the conclusions noting that realistic systematics could degrade the forecasted precision. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (results and model comparison): the statement that results are insensitive to the specific f(R) functional form is not demonstrated; the growth-index parametrization is introduced as a fitted function of scale and redshift, so the claimed support for f(R) over GR may depend on the chosen parametrization and on the particular f(R) model used to generate the mock data.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that we did not demonstrate insensitivity to the choice of f(R) functional form or to the precise parametrization of γ(k,z). The manuscript employs one representative viable f(R) model to generate the mock data and adopts a specific scale- and redshift-dependent parametrization for γ. We will revise the text in §4 (and the abstract) to remove the claim of insensitivity, to state explicitly that the results apply to the class of viable f(R) models that produce scale-dependent growth, and to note that the scale dependence itself is the generic distinguishing feature relative to GR. This will make the interpretation of the model-comparison results more precise. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard forecast based on independent perturbation theory and survey modeling

full rationale

The paper performs a forecast of parameter constraints from future 21 cm intensity mapping on the scale-dependent growth index in f(R) models. The derivation relies on established linear perturbation equations in modified gravity (yielding scale-dependent growth) combined with standard Fisher-matrix forecasting on the HI power spectrum; neither step reduces to a self-definition, a fitted quantity renamed as a prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. The growth-index parametrization is an input modeling choice drawn from the literature, not derived from the forecast results themselves. The analysis remains self-contained against external cosmological codes, survey specifications, and independent f(R) model implementations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review prevents exhaustive extraction; the work implicitly relies on standard assumptions about linear perturbation theory in f(R) and on the functional forms of viable f(R) models that recover LambdaCDM at high redshift.

free parameters (1)
  • growth index gamma(k,z)
    Scale- and redshift-dependent growth index introduced to capture modified-gravity effects; its functional form is fitted or parametrized rather than derived from first principles.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Linear matter density contrast evolution remains valid on the scales probed by 21 cm surveys
    Standard assumption in cosmological forecasts; invoked when translating survey sensitivity into constraints on growth.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5718 in / 1223 out tokens · 18095 ms · 2026-06-28T08:30:48.296458+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

150 extracted references · 131 canonical work pages · 58 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    and others

    Ocampo, I. and others. Euclid: Forecasts on \ CDM consistency tests with growth rate data. arXiv e-prints. 2025. arXiv:2507.22780

    arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Observational Constraints on Growth Index with Cosmography

    Yin, Zhao-Yu and Wei, Hao. Observational Constraints on Growth Index with Cosmography. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2019. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7191-8. arXiv:1902.00289

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7191-8 2019

  3. [3]

    Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , number =. 2023 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2639 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2639 2023

  4. [4]

    Astrophys. J. , pages =. 1997 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1086/303939 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1086/303939 1997

  5. [5]

    Phys. Rev. D , note =. 2011 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.083005 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.083005 2011

  6. [6]

    2021 , bdsk-url-1 =

    JCAP , pages =. 2021 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/039 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/039 2021

  7. [7]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

    Astron. Astrophys. , pages =. 2020 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833887 , eprint =

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833887 2020

  8. [8]

    Phys. Rev. D , number =. 2014 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.023002 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.023002 2014

  9. [9]

    Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , pages =. 2004 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07907.x , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07907.x 2004

  10. [10]

    The anisotropic power spectrum and bispectrum in the f(phi) F^2 mechanism

    Bartolo, Nicola and Matarrese, Sabino and Peloso, Marco and Ricciardone, Angelo. Anisotropic power spectrum and bispectrum in the f( )F^2 mechanism. Phys. Rev. D. 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.023504. arXiv:1210.3257

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.023504 2013

  11. [11]

    Asymmetric Sky from the Long Mode Modulations

    Abolhasani, Ali Akbar and Baghram, Shant and Firouzjahi, Hassan and Namjoo, Mohammad Hossein. Asymmetric Sky from the Long Mode Modulations. Phys. Rev. D. 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.063511. arXiv:1306.6932

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.063511 2014

  12. [12]

    The CMB asymmetry from inflation

    Lyth, David H. The CMB modulation from inflation. JCAP. 2013. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/08/007. arXiv:1304.1270

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/08/007 2013

  13. [13]

    2022 , bdsk-url-1 =

    JCAP , pages =. 2022 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/11/003 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/11/003 2022

  14. [15]

    Cosmology , year =

    Weinberg, Steven , date-added =. Cosmology , year =

  15. [16]

    21 cm cosmology in the 21st century , url =

    Jonathan R Pritchard and Abraham Loeb , date-added =. 21 cm cosmology in the 21st century , url =. 2012 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/8/086901 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/8/086901 2012

  16. [17]

    Constraining statistical isotropy using 21 cm power spectrum and bispectrum

    Joshi, Bhuwan and Kothari, Rahul. Constraining statistical isotropy using 21 cm power spectrum and bispectrum. JCAP. 2025. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/08/047. arXiv:2502.10717

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/08/047 2025

  17. [18]

    Constraints on growth index parameters from current and future observations

    Dossett, Jason and Ishak, Mustapha and Moldenhauer, Jacob and Gong, Yungui and Wang, Anzhong and Gong, Yungui. Constraints on growth index parameters from current and future observations. JCAP. 2010. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/04/022. arXiv:1004.3086

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/04/022 2010

  18. [19]

    The 21cm angular-power spectrum from the dark ages , volume =. Phys. Rev. D , pages =. 2007 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.083005 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.083005 2007

  19. [20]

    doi:10.1088/2514-3433/ab4a73 , adsurl =

    The Cosmic 21-cm Revolution , url =. 2019 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1088/2514-3433/ab4a73 , editor =

    work page doi:10.1088/2514-3433/ab4a73 2019

  20. [21]

    Cosmological Reconstruction From Galaxy Light: Neural Network Based Light-Matter Connection

    Modi, Chirag and Feng, Yu and Seljak, Uros. Cosmological Reconstruction From Galaxy Light: Neural Network Based Light-Matter Connection. JCAP. 2018. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/028. arXiv:1805.02247

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/028 2018

  21. [22]

    Towards optimal extraction of cosmological information from nonlinear data

    Seljak, Uros and Aslanyan, Grigor and Feng, Yu and Modi, Chirag. Towards optimal extraction of cosmological information from nonlinear data. JCAP. 2017. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/12/009. arXiv:1706.06645

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/12/009 2017

  22. [23]

    Wang, Huiyuan and Mo, H. J. and Yang, Xiaohu and Zhang, Youcai and Shi, JingJing and Jing, Y. P. and Liu, Chengze and Li, Shijie and Kang, Xi and Gao, Yang. ELUCID - Exploring the Local Universe with reConstructed Initial Density field III: Constrained Simulation in the SDSS Volume. Astrophys. J. 2016. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/164. arXiv:1608.01763

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/0004-637x/831/2/164 2016

  23. [24]

    Wang, Huiyuan and Mo, H. J. and Yang, Xiaohu and Jing, Y. P. and Lin, W. P. ELUCID - Exploring the Local Universe with reConstructed Initial Density field I: Hamiltonian Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method with Particle Mesh Dynamics. Astrophys. J. 2014. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/794/1/94. arXiv:1407.3451

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/794/1/94 2014

  24. [25]

    The Initial Conditions of the Universe from Constrained Simulations

    Kitaura, Francisco-Shu. The Initial Conditions of the Universe from Constrained Simulations. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2013. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sls029. arXiv:1203.4184

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sls029 2013

  25. [26]

    2010, MNRAS, 408, 2115, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17291.x

    Jasche, J. and Kitaura, F. S. Fast Hamiltonian sampling for large scale structure inference. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2010. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16897.x. arXiv:0911.2496

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16897.x 2010

  26. [28]

    K.\ 2011, , 415, 2920, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18906.x

    Liu, Adrian and Tegmark, Max , year=. How well can we measure and understand foregrounds with 21-cm experiments?: Measuring and understanding 21-cm foregrounds , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19989.x , number=

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19989.x 2011

  27. [29]

    A method for 21-cm power spectrum estimation in the presence of foregrounds , volume=

    Liu, Adrian and Tegmark, Max , year=. A method for 21-cm power spectrum estimation in the presence of foregrounds , volume=. Physical Review D , publisher=. doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.103006 , number=

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.103006

  28. [30]

    Phys. Rept. , pages =. 2006 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.08.002 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.08.002 2006

  29. [31]

    21 Centimeter Fluctuations from Cosmic Gas at High Redshifts

    Zaldarriaga, Matias and Furlanetto, Steven R. and Hernquist, Lars. 21 Centimeter fluctuations from cosmic gas at high redshifts. Astrophys. J. 2004. doi:10.1086/386327. arXiv:astro-ph/0311514

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/386327 2004

  30. [32]

    The Fast Fourier Transform Telescope

    Tegmark, Max and Zaldarriaga, Matias. The Fast Fourier Transform Telescope. Phys. Rev. D. 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.083530. arXiv:0805.4414

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.083530 2009

  31. [33]

    Dodelson, Scott , date-added =

  32. [34]

    The foreground wedge and 21 cm BAO surveys

    Seo, Hee-Jong and Hirata, Christopher M. The foreground wedge and 21 cm BAO surveys. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2016. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2806. arXiv:1508.06503

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2806 2016

  33. [35]

    What Next-Generation 21 cm Power Spectrum Measurements Can Teach Us About the Epoch of Reionization

    Pober, Jonathan C. and others. What Next-Generation 21 cm Power Spectrum Measurements Can Teach Us About the Epoch of Reionization. Astrophys. J. 2014. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/66. arXiv:1310.7031

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/782/2/66 2014

  34. [36]

    A Per-Baseline, Delay-Spectrum Technique for Accessing the 21cm Cosmic Reionization Signature

    Parsons, Aaron R. and Pober, Jonathan C. and Aguirre, James E. and Carilli, Christopher L. and Jacobs, Daniel C. and Moore, David F. A Per-Baseline, Delay-Spectrum Technique for Accessing the 21cm Cosmic Reionization Signature. Astrophys. J. 2012. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/165. arXiv:1204.4749

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/756/2/165 2012

  35. [37]

    Statistical Methods Lecture Notes , url =

    Luca Amendola , date-added =. Statistical Methods Lecture Notes , url =. 2024 , bdsk-url-1 =

    2024

  36. [38]

    A wide-angle formulation of foreground filters for HI intensity mapping

    Kothari, Rahul and Maartens, Roy. A wide-angle formulation of foreground filters for HI intensity mapping. JCAP. 2024. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/089. arXiv:2308.03462

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/089 2024

  37. [39]

    Astrophys

    Astron. Astrophys. , pages =. 2022 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141707 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141707 2022

  38. [40]

    Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , number =. 2021 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3064 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3064 2021

  39. [41]

    All-Sky Interferometry with Spherical Harmonic Transit Telescopes

    Shaw, J. Richard and Sigurdson, Kris and Pen, Ue-Li and Stebbins, Albert and Sitwell, Michael. All-Sky Interferometry with Spherical Harmonic Transit Telescopes. Astrophys. J. 2014. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/781/2/57. arXiv:1302.0327

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/781/2/57 2014

  40. [42]

    Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , number =. 2016 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1039 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1039 2016

  41. [43]

    Relating the inhomogeneous power spectrum to the CMB hemispherical anisotropy

    Rath, Pranati K. and Aluri, Pavan K. and Jain, Pankaj. Relating the inhomogeneous power spectrum to the CMB hemispherical anisotropy. Phys. Rev. D. 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.023515. arXiv:1403.2567

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.023515 2015

  42. [44]

    Phys. Rev. D , number =. 2016 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.063531 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.063531 2016

  43. [45]

    Phys. Rev. D , pages =. 2007 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.103529 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.103529 2007

  44. [46]

    Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , number =. 2021 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab027 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab027 2021

  45. [47]

    Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , number =. 2015 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2575 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2575 2015

  46. [48]

    Phys. Rev. D , number =. 2017 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.043515 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.043515 2017

  47. [49]

    2020 , bdsk-url-1 =

    JCAP , pages =. 2020 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/11/052 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/11/052 2020

  48. [50]

    Constraints on cosmic hemispherical power anomalies from quasars

    Hirata, Christopher M. Constraints on cosmic hemispherical power anomalies from quasars. JCAP. 2009. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/09/011. arXiv:0907.0703

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/09/011 2009

  49. [51]

    Newburgh, L. B. and others. HIRAX: A Probe of Dark Energy and Radio Transients. Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 2016. doi:10.1117/12.2234286. arXiv:1607.02059

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1117/12.2234286 2016

  50. [52]

    Hydrogen Intensity and Real-Time Analysis Experiment: 256-element array status and overview

    Crichton, Devin and others. Hydrogen Intensity and Real-Time Analysis Experiment: 256-element array status and overview. J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst. 2022. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.8.1.011019. arXiv:2109.13755

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jatis.8.1.011019 2022

  51. [53]

    Inflation and Early Dark Energy with a Stage II Hydrogen Intensity Mapping experiment

    Ansari, R \'e za and others. Inflation and Early Dark Energy with a Stage II Hydrogen Intensity Mapping experiment. arXiv e-prints. 2018. arXiv:1810.09572

    arXiv 2018

  52. [54]

    Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. , number =. 2020 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab5bfd , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab5bfd 2020

  53. [56]

    Phys. Rev. D , number =. 2015 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.083514 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.083514 2015

  54. [57]

    Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , pages =. 2015 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2474 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2474 2015

  55. [58]

    Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , number =. 2019 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1916 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1916 2019

  56. [59]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2343 , eprint =

    2021 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2343 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2343 2021

  57. [60]

    and others

    Bacon, David J. and others. Cosmology with Phase 1 of the Square Kilometre Array: Red Book 2018: Technical specifications and performance forecasts. Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral. 2020. doi:10.1017/pasa.2019.51. arXiv:1811.02743

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2019.51 2018

  58. [61]

    2019 , bdsk-url-1 =

    JCAP , pages =. 2019 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/04/053 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/04/053 2019

  59. [62]

    2016 , bdsk-url-1 =

    JCAP , pages =. 2016 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/01/016 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/01/016 2016

  60. [63]

    Phys. Rev. D , pages =. 2001 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.083005 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.64.083005 2001

  61. [64]

    Class. Quant. Grav. , number =. 2021 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abf1c1 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abf1c1 2021

  62. [65]

    2020 , bdsk-url-1 =

    JCAP , pages =. 2020 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/12/003 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/12/003 2020

  63. [66]

    Testing the scale-dependent hemispherical asymmetry with the 21-cm power spectrum from the epoch of reionization

    Li, Botao and Chen, Zhaoting and Cai, Yi-Fu and Mao, Yi. Testing the scale-dependent hemispherical asymmetry with the 21-cm power spectrum from the epoch of reionization. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2019. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1619. arXiv:1904.04683

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1619 2019

  64. [67]

    The OH line contamination of 21 cm intensity fluctuation measurements for z=1~4

    Gong, Yan and Chen, Xuelei and Silva, Marta and Cooray, Asantha and Santos, Mario G. The OH line contamination of 21 cm intensity fluctuation measurements for z=1 4. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2011. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/740/1/L20. arXiv:1108.0947

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/2041-8205/740/1/l20 2011

  65. [68]

    Is the observable Universe consistent with the cosmological principle?

    Aluri, Pavan Kumar and others. Is the observable Universe consistent with the cosmological principle?. Class. Quant. Grav. 2023. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/acbefc. arXiv:2207.05765

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/acbefc 2023

  66. [70]

    Phys. Rev. D , pages =. 2005 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.083508 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.083508 2005

  67. [71]

    Astrophys. J. , pages =. 2007 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1086/510511 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1086/510511 2007

  68. [72]

    Phys. Rev. D , pages =. 2005 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.103002 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.72.103002 2005

  69. [73]

    Astrophys

    Astron. Astrophys. , pages =. 2020 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935201 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935201 2020

  70. [74]

    Cosmology with a SKA HI intensity mapping survey

    Santos, Mario G. and others. Cosmology from a SKA HI intensity mapping survey. PoS. 2015. doi:10.22323/1.215.0019. arXiv:1501.03989

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.22323/1.215.0019 2015

  71. [75]

    Ade, P. A. R. and others. Planck 2015 results. XVI. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB. Astron. Astrophys. 2016. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526681. arXiv:1506.07135

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526681 2015

  72. [76]

    Ade, P. A. R. and others. Planck 2013 results. XXIII. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB. Astron. Astrophys. 2014. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321534. arXiv:1303.5083

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321534 2013

  73. [77]

    Astrophys. J. Lett. , pages =. 2007 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1086/518091 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1086/518091 2007

  74. [78]

    Astrophys. J. , pages =. 2009 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/985 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/699/2/985 2009

  75. [79]

    Astrophys. J. , note =. 2004 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1086/382267 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1086/382267 2004

  76. [80]

    Phys. Rev. D , number =. 2016 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.103506 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.103506 2016

  77. [81]

    Could dark energy be vector-like?

    Armendariz-Picon, Christian. Could dark energy be vector-like?. JCAP. 2004. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2004/07/007. arXiv:astro-ph/0405267

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2004/07/007 2004

  78. [82]

    Scoccimarro, Roman and Couchman, H. M. P. and Frieman, Joshua A. The Bispectrum as a Signature of Gravitational Instability in Redshift-Space. Astrophys. J. 1999. doi:10.1086/307220. arXiv:astro-ph/9808305

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/307220 1999

  79. [83]

    Large-Scale Structure of the Universe and Cosmological Perturbation Theory

    Bernardeau, F. and Colombi, S. and Gaztanaga, E. and Scoccimarro, R. Large scale structure of the universe and cosmological perturbation theory. Phys. Rept. 2002. doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00135-7. arXiv:astro-ph/0112551

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(02)00135-7 2002

  80. [84]

    Evidence for Quadratic Tidal Tensor Bias from the Halo Bispectrum

    Baldauf, Tobias and Seljak, Uros and Desjacques, Vincent and McDonald, Patrick. Evidence for Quadratic Tidal Tensor Bias from the Halo Bispectrum. Phys. Rev. D. 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.083540. arXiv:1201.4827

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.083540 2012

Showing first 80 references.