pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.03815 · v1 · pith:NEHAYP4Xnew · submitted 2026-06-02 · 🪐 quant-ph

A Tutorial for Characterizing Transmon Qubits

Alexandre M. Souza , Davi A. D. Chaves , Carmem M. Gilardoni , Roberto S. Sarthour , Jo\~ao P. Sinnecker , Ivan S. Oliveira This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 09:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords transmon qubitsqubit characterizationsuperconducting qubitscalibration routinesparametric amplifierflux sweet spotreadout optimizationquantum device bring-up
0
0 comments X

The pith

A step-by-step experimental workflow lets newcomers fully calibrate tunable transmon qubits from cryogenics to coupling characterization.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compiles and demonstrates a complete practical sequence for bringing up transmon-based quantum processors. It walks through cryogenic wiring, parametric amplifier tuning, flux sweet-spot finding, pulse calibration, readout optimization, and qubit-qubit coupling measurement on a commercial five-qubit device. The authors present these routines as a ready reference so that experimentalists can move from setup to multiqubit-ready qubits without assembling disparate information from many sources.

Core claim

The authors claim that following the described workflow—from initial cryogenic setup and wiring through parametric amplifier optimum operation, flux sweet-spot identification, pulse calibration, readout optimization, and qubit-qubit coupling characterization—enables efficient and reliable characterization of tunable transmon qubits, as verified on a commercial five-qubit processor.

What carries the argument

the complete workflow covering cryogenic setup, wiring, parametric amplifier tuning, flux sweet-spot identification, pulse calibration, readout optimization, and qubit-qubit coupling characterization

If this is right

  • New experimental groups can reach calibrated single-qubit and two-qubit operations without compiling information across many separate papers.
  • The same sequence can be applied to other tunable-transmon devices before any multiqubit gate work begins.
  • Parametric-amplifier and readout optimization steps become reproducible reference points rather than ad-hoc tuning.
  • Flux sweet-spot identification and pulse calibration routines can be treated as standard prerequisites for further device development.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The workflow may shorten the typical ramp-up time for new superconducting-qubit laboratories.
  • If the routines prove transferable, they could serve as a baseline for automated calibration scripts on larger processors.
  • The emphasis on pre-multiqubit steps implies that coupling characterization is the final gate before scaling to algorithms.

Load-bearing premise

The compiled routines are complete, accurate, and directly transferable to other experimental setups without requiring substantial additional expertise or modifications beyond what is described.

What would settle it

An independent lab follows every listed step on a different five-qubit transmon processor and fails to obtain stable qubit operation or accurate coupling values at the end of the sequence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.03815 by Alexandre M. Souza, Carmem M. Gilardoni, Davi A. D. Chaves, Ivan S. Oliveira, Jo\~ao P. Sinnecker, Roberto S. Sarthour.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Overview of transmon qubits. (a) Schematic view of the five qubits Soprano-D2 chip. (b) Schematics of a typical chip containing two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Bloch sphere representation of a qubit. Each point on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Representation of the experimental setup used in the exper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Calibration of traveling-wave parametric amplifier. (a) Signal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Readout probe frequency versus flux bias. The initial probe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. One-tone experiment. A drive pulse is applied to the qubit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Sweet-spot determination. (a) Qubit spectroscopy show [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Rabi oscillation of a transmon qubit. (a) Rabi oscillations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Qubit spectroscopy showing the output voltage observed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Dispersive shift. (a) Output transmission voltage measured [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Qubit anharmonicity measurements. Anharmonicity ex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Calibrating Readout pulse. Plots show [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Qubit–qubit coupling experiments. (a) Transition frequency of Q3 as a function of the applied flux bias. (b) Avoided level crossing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Error characterization showing the evolution of the proba [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Error characterization showing the evolution of the prob [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Comparison between the probability of finding the intended [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Diagram summarizing the minimal required steps for transmon qubit characterization. A schematic representation of on-chip [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_19.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Superconducting transmon qubits are a leading technology for quantum information processing, yet their reliable operation rests on meticulous calibration and characterization routines. These processes have been fine-tuned and are relatively well understood by the quantum computing community. Nevertheless, it is often challenging for newcomers to compile all the available information into a practical experimental flow. In this tutorial, we present a comprehensive walkthrough for the characterization and optimization of tunable transmon qubits, demonstrated on a commercial five-qubit processor. Moving beyond theoretical description, we detail in a straightforward manner the complete workflow, from cryogenic setup and wiring to parametric amplifier optimum operation, flux sweet-spot identification, pulse calibration, and readout optimization. We also demonstrate the characterization of qubit-qubit coupling, covering all steps before multiqubit operations. This guide serves as a reference for experimentalists seeking to efficiently bring up transmon-based quantum devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a tutorial that compiles and demonstrates standard procedures for characterizing tunable transmon qubits, covering the full experimental workflow from cryogenic setup and wiring through parametric amplifier optimization, flux sweet-spot identification, pulse calibration, readout optimization, and qubit-qubit coupling characterization, all shown on a commercial five-qubit processor.

Significance. The tutorial compiles well-established transmon characterization methods into a single practical reference and demonstrates them end-to-end on commercial hardware; if the steps are accurately and completely described, this could lower the barrier for experimentalists new to the platform by providing a concrete, transferable workflow rather than scattered literature references.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase "tunable transmon qubits" appears in the abstract while the title refers only to "Transmon Qubits"; a brief clarification on whether fixed-frequency devices are also addressed would improve precision.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from a consolidated table (perhaps in the final section) listing typical parameter values, target metrics, and common failure modes for each calibration step to aid quick reference.
  3. Ensure consistent use of SI units and explicit definitions for any device-specific quantities (e.g., coupling strengths) on first appearance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive review and recommendation to accept the manuscript. The referee's summary correctly identifies the tutorial's scope and purpose as a practical, end-to-end guide demonstrated on commercial hardware. There are no major comments requiring response or revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely descriptive tutorial with no derivations or predictions

full rationale

The paper is explicitly a tutorial that compiles and demonstrates standard transmon characterization procedures on one commercial device. Its central claim is that the described workflow is complete enough to serve as a practical reference. No novel scientific assertion, derivation, equation, prediction, or fitted quantity is advanced anywhere in the manuscript. The abstract and full text contain only procedural descriptions with no load-bearing steps that reduce to self-definition, fitted inputs, or self-citation chains. This is the most common honest finding for reference/tutorial papers.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a tutorial paper with no mathematical derivations, fitted parameters, or new entities introduced. All content is based on established practices in the field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5703 in / 1166 out tokens · 28163 ms · 2026-06-28T09:44:18.484474+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nature , volume =

    Observation of constructive interference at the edge of quantum ergodicity , author =. Nature , volume =

  2. [2]

    IBM Quantum Roadmap , author =

  3. [3]

    Applied Physics Reviews , volume =

    A quantum engineer's guide to superconducting qubits , author =. Applied Physics Reviews , volume =

  4. [4]

    Circuit quantum electrodynamics , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 2021 , month =

    2021

  5. [5]

    Physical Review A , volume =

    Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation , author =. Physical Review A , volume =

  6. [6]

    Physical Review Letters , volume =

    Improved superconducting qubit readout by qubit-induced nonlinearities , author =. Physical Review Letters , volume =

  7. [7]

    PRX Quantum , volume =

    Practical guide for building superconducting quantum devices , author =. PRX Quantum , volume =

  8. [8]

    Searching for Dark Matter with a Superconducting Qubit , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.141302 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.141302 2021

  9. [9]

    Quantum-Enhanced Sensing of Axion Dark Matter with a Transmon-Based Single Microwave Photon Counter , author =. Phys. Rev. X , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.15.021031 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.15.021031 2025

  10. [10]

    High-dynamic-range quantum sensing of magnons and their dynamics using a superconducting qubit , author =. Phys. Rev. Appl. , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1103/6dmm-mnxd , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/6dmm-mnxd 2025

  11. [11]

    Nature Communications , volume =

    Studying phonon coherence with a quantum sensor , author =. Nature Communications , volume =

  12. [12]

    Superconducting quasiparticle-amplifying transmon: A qubit-based sensor for meV-scale phonons and single terahertz photons , author =. Phys. Rev. Appl. , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.054009 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.22.054009 2024

  13. [13]

    Physics Reports , volume =

    Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits , author =. Physics Reports , volume =

  14. [14]

    Reports on Progress in Physics , abstract =

    Wendin, G , title =. Reports on Progress in Physics , abstract =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa7e1a , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa7e1a 2017

  15. [15]

    Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2007 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042319 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.76.042319 2007

  16. [16]

    and Braumüller, Jochen and Krantz, Philip and Wang, Joel I.-J

    Kjaergaard, Morten and Schwartz, Mollie E. and Braumüller, Jochen and Krantz, Philip and Wang, Joel I.-J. and Gustavsson, Simon and Oliver, William D. Superconducting Qubits: Current State of Play. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics. 2020. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031119-050605

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031119-050605 2020

  17. [17]

    and Chuang, Isaac L

    Nielsen, Michael A. and Chuang, Isaac L. , year=. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition , publisher=

  18. [18]

    2011 , publisher=

    NMR Quantum Information Processing , author=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  19. [19]

    Trapping a Single Vortex and Reducing Quasiparticles in a Superconducting Resonator , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2014 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.117002 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.117002 2014

  20. [20]

    Non-Poissonian Quantum Jumps of a Fluxonium Qubit due to Quasiparticle Excitations , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2014 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.247001 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.247001 2014

  21. [21]

    Nature Communications , volume =

    Measurement and control of quasiparticle dynamics in a superconducting qubit , author =. Nature Communications , volume =. 2014 , doi =

    2014

  22. [22]

    Learning-Based Calibration of Flux Crosstalk in Transmon Qubit Arrays , author =. Phys. Rev. Appl. , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.024070 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.20.024070 2023

  23. [23]

    Quantum limits on noise in linear amplifiers , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 1982 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.26.1817 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.26.1817 1982

  24. [24]

    Deconstructing the Traveling Wave Parametric Amplifier , year=

    Malnou, Maxime and Aumentado, José , journal=. Deconstructing the Traveling Wave Parametric Amplifier , year=

  25. [25]

    Simple pulses for elimination of leakage in weakly nonlinear qubits , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =

  26. [26]

    Analytic control methods for high-fidelity unitary operations in a weakly nonlinear oscillator , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =

  27. [27]

    NMR-like Control of a Quantum Bit Superconducting Circuit , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2004 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.157005 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.157005 2004

  28. [28]

    Jones , keywords =

    Jonathan A. Jones , keywords =. Controlling NMR spin systems for quantum computation , journal =. 2024 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnmrs.2024.02.002 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2024.02.002 2024

  29. [29]

    Liquid-state nuclear magnetic resonance as a testbed for developing quantum control methods , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2008 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.78.012328 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.78.012328 2008

  30. [30]

    Protocols for optimal readout of qubits using a continuous quantum nondemolition measurement , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2007 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.76.012325 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.76.012325 2007

  31. [31]

    Tomography via correlation of noisy measurement records , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.91.022118 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.91.022118 2015

  32. [32]

    Model-Based Optimization of Superconducting Qubit Readout , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.100603 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.100603 2024

  33. [33]

    Enhanced qubit readout via reinforcement learning , author =. Phys. Rev. Appl. , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.054057 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.23.054057 2025

  34. [34]

    Active Resonator Reset in the Nonlinear Dispersive Regime of Circuit QED , author =. Phys. Rev. Appl. , volume =. 2016 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.6.034008 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.6.034008 2016

  35. [35]

    Rapid Driven Reset of a Qubit Readout Resonator , author =. Phys. Rev. Appl. , volume =. 2016 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.5.011001 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.5.011001 2016

  36. [36]

    1986 , issn =

    Composite pulses , journal =. 1986 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6565(86)80005-X , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0079-6565(86)80005-x 1986

  37. [37]

    Alway and Jonathan A

    William G. Alway and Jonathan A. Jones , keywords =. Arbitrary precision composite pulses for NMR quantum computing , journal =. 2007 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2007.09.001 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2007.09.001 2007

  38. [38]

    Measuring and Suppressing Quantum State Leakage in a Superconducting Qubit , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2016 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.020501 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.020501 2016

  39. [39]

    Optimized driving of superconducting artificial atoms for improved single-qubit gates , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2010 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.82.040305 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.82.040305 2010

  40. [40]

    Reduced phase error through optimized control of a superconducting qubit , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2010 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.82.042339 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.82.042339 2010

  41. [41]

    and Lidar, Daniel A

    Tripathi, Vinay and Kowsari, Daria and Saurav, Kumar and Zhang, Haimeng and Levenson-Falk, Eli M. and Lidar, Daniel A. , title =. Chemical Reviews , volume =

  42. [42]

    and Álvarez, Gonzalo A

    Souza, Alexandre M. and Álvarez, Gonzalo A. and Suter, Dieter , title =. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , volume =. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0355 , url =

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0355 2012

  43. [43]

    , title =

    Souza, Alexandre M. , title =. Quantum Information Processing , volume =

  44. [44]

    Dynamical decoupling for superconducting qubits: A performance survey , author =. Phys. Rev. Appl. , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.064027 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.20.064027 2023

  45. [45]

    Probst and F

    S. Probst and F. B. Song and P. A. Bushev and A. V. Ustinov and M. Weides , title =. Review of Scientific Instruments , volume =

  46. [46]

    M. S. Khalil and M. J. A. Stoutimore and F. C. Wellstood and K. D. Osborn , title =. Journal of Applied Physics , volume =

  47. [47]

    and Johnson, Blake R

    Ryan, Colm A. and Johnson, Blake R. and Ristè, Diego and Donovan, Brian and Ohki, Thomas A. , title =. Review of Scientific Instruments , volume =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.5006525 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5006525 2017

  48. [48]

    Jens Hedegaard Nielsen and Mikhail Astafev and William H. P. Nielsen and Dominik Vogel and Harshit Lakhotia and Alex Johnson and others , title =. 2026 , publisher =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.16941936 , url =

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.16941936 2026

  49. [49]

    M. A. Rol and C. Dickel and S. Asaad and N. K. Langford and C. C. Bultink and R. Sagastizabal and G. de Lange and X. Fu and S. R. de Jong and F. Luthi and W. Vlothuizen and M. Serrao Moreira , title =. 2019 , publisher =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3574563 , url =

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.3574563 2019

  50. [50]

    2024 , howpublished =

    2024

  51. [51]

    2026 , howpublished =

    2026

  52. [52]

    La Rose , title =

    R. La Rose , title =. Quantum , volume =

  53. [53]

    Chong and Diana Franklin and Margaret Martonosi , title =

    Frederic T. Chong and Diana Franklin and Margaret Martonosi , title =. Nature , volume =

  54. [54]

    2024 , eprint=

    Low-temperature benchmarking of qubit control wires by primary electron thermometry , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  55. [55]

    Stasino and P

    V. Stasino and P. Mastrovito and C. Cosenza and A. Levochkina and M. Esposito and D. Montemurro and G. P. Pepe and A. Bruno and F. Tafuri and D. Massarotti and H. G. Ahmad , title =. Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism , volume =

  56. [56]

    Multimode mediated qubit-qubit coupling and dark-state symmetries in circuit quantum electrodynamics , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2011 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.83.063827 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.83.063827 2011

  57. [57]

    Quantum-information processing with circuit quantum electrodynamics , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2007 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.75.032329 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.75.032329 2007

  58. [58]

    Nature , volume =

    Coupling superconducting qubits via a cavity bus , author =. Nature , volume =. 2007 , doi =

    2007

  59. [59]

    Colloquium: Protecting quantum information against environmental noise , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 2016 , month =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.041001 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.041001 2016

  60. [60]

    Robust Dynamical Decoupling for Quantum Computing and Quantum Memory , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2011 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.240501 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.240501 2011

  61. [61]

    Demonstration of Fidelity Improvement Using Dynamical Decoupling with Superconducting Qubits , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.220502 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.220502 2018

  62. [62]

    Suppression of Crosstalk in Superconducting Qubits Using Dynamical Decoupling , author =. Phys. Rev. Appl. , volume =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.024068 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.18.024068 2022

  63. [63]

    Demonstration of Algorithmic Quantum Speedup , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.210602 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.210602 2023

  64. [64]

    Robust Decoupling Techniques to Extend Quantum Coherence in Diamond , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2010 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.200402 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.200402 2010

  65. [65]

    High-fidelity gate operations for quantum computing beyond dephasing time limits , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.92.062332 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.92.062332 2015

  66. [66]

    Science Advances , volume =

    Zi-Jie Chen and Hongwei Huang and Lida Sun and Qing-Xuan Jie and Jie Zhou and Ziyue Hua and Yifang Xu and Weiting Wang and Guang-Can Guo and Chang-Ling Zou and Luyan Sun and Xu-Bo Zou , title =. Science Advances , volume =. 2025 , doi =. https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.adr0875 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adr0875 2025

  67. [67]

    Noise tailoring for scalable quantum computation via randomized compiling , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2016 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.94.052325 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.94.052325 2016

  68. [68]

    Model-free readout-error mitigation for quantum expectation values , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.105.032620 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.105.032620 2022

  69. [69]

    Zaletel and Kristan Temme and Abhinav Kandala , title =

    Youngseok Kim and Andrew Eddins and Sajant Anand and Ken Xuan Wei and Ewout van den Berg and Sami Rosenblatt and Hasan Nayfeh and Yantao Wu and Michael P. Zaletel and Kristan Temme and Abhinav Kandala , title =. Nature , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  70. [70]

    arXiv:2411.10406 , archivePrefix=

    How to Build a Quantum Supercomputer: Scaling from Hundreds to Millions of Qubits , author=. arXiv:2411.10406 , archivePrefix=. 2026 , eprint=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  71. [71]

    Experimental protection of quantum gates against decoherence and control errors , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.86.050301 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.86.050301 2012