pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05539 · v1 · pith:UGGTTUIWnew · submitted 2026-06-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Dissipative Cosmology and the Nature of Dark Energy: Insights from Bulk Viscosity with DESI DR2 observations

Shahnawaz A. Adil , Sonej Alam , Somasri Sen , J. Alberto Vazquez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 00:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords bulk viscositydark energycosmological modelsDESI DR2cosmic accelerationinteracting dark energyLambda CDM comparison
0
0 comments X

The pith

A bulk viscous fluid model for dark energy fits supernova, DESI, and CMB data better than the cosmological constant when non-minimal interactions are allowed.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether late-time cosmic acceleration can arise from dissipative effects in a bulk viscous fluid rather than a cosmological constant. It considers both minimal and non-minimal coupling to matter and fits the model to Type Ia supernovae, DESI DR2 baryon acoustic oscillations, and Planck 2018 CMB measurements. The results indicate that viscous dissipation reproduces the expansion history of dynamical dark energy and yields statistically better fits than Lambda CDM, with the strongest improvement appearing in the interacting non-minimal case. This positions dissipative fluid descriptions as a concrete alternative mechanism for the observed acceleration.

Core claim

Dark energy modeled as a bulk viscous fluid, in minimally and non-minimally coupled scenarios, successfully mimics dynamical dark energy and produces improved fits to SNe Ia, DESI DR2 BAO, and Planck 2018 CMB data compared with Lambda CDM, especially when non-minimal interactions are included.

What carries the argument

The bulk viscous fluid, whose negative pressure arises from a dissipation term proportional to the expansion rate, providing the effective equation of state needed for acceleration.

If this is right

  • Dissipative processes can replace the cosmological constant as the driver of acceleration in viable cosmological models.
  • Non-minimal coupling between the viscous fluid and matter improves agreement with current combined datasets.
  • The same viscous mechanism can be tested against future large-scale structure and supernova surveys.
  • Models without a constant dark-energy density become competitive when dissipation is allowed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Confirmation would encourage searches for microphysical sources of viscosity in dark-energy candidates.
  • Similar dissipation terms might be applied to early-universe or modified-gravity scenarios.
  • Tension between different cosmological probes could be re-examined under viscous rather than vacuum-energy assumptions.

Load-bearing premise

The bulk viscous fluid supplies a physically consistent description of dark energy whose fitted parameters remain free of unphysical values or conflicts with other observations.

What would settle it

Future data that force the viscosity coefficient to zero or produce parameter values that violate energy conditions or conflict with independent expansion-rate measurements.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.05539 by J. Alberto Vazquez, Shahnawaz A. Adil, Somasri Sen, Sonej Alam.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. 2-D posterior distributions with 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. 2-D Posteriors with 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. 2-D Posteriors with heatmap for the degeneracies with n [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. 2-D Posteriors with heatmap for the degeneracies with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. 2-D Posteriors with heatmap for the degeneracies with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We explore a cosmological model in which dark energy is described by a bulk viscous fluid, providing a dissipative mechanism for late-time cosmic acceleration. Considering both minimally and non-minimally coupled scenarios, we constrain the model using SNe Ia, DESI DR2 BAO, and Planck 2018 CMB data. We find that viscous effects can successfully mimic dynamical dark energy and yield improved fits over $\Lambda$CDM, particularly in the interacting non-minimal case. Our results demonstrate that dissipative processes offer a viable and physically motivated alternative to the cosmological constant in explaining the current accelerated expansion of the universe.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript models dark energy as a bulk viscous fluid in minimally and non-minimally coupled scenarios (including an interacting case), derives the background evolution, and performs MCMC constraints using SNe Ia, DESI DR2 BAO, and Planck 2018 CMB data. It claims that viscous effects successfully mimic dynamical dark energy and produce improved fits relative to ΛCDM, particularly for the interacting non-minimal model.

Significance. If the quantitative fit improvements are shown to be statistically robust after penalizing for extra parameters and the model parameters remain free of unphysical consequences, the work would add to explorations of dissipative mechanisms as alternatives to the cosmological constant by incorporating the latest DESI DR2 observations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and results section] Abstract and results section: the central claim that viscous models yield 'improved fits' over ΛCDM is not supported by any reported χ² values, Δχ², AIC/BIC, or effective degrees of freedom in the provided description, despite the introduction of two additional free parameters; without these metrics the statistical preference cannot be assessed.
  2. [Methodology and discussion] Methodology and discussion: the physical viability of the bulk viscosity coefficient and non-minimal coupling as a dark energy description requires explicit checks that the best-fit parameters produce no violations of energy conditions or instabilities in the perturbation equations, as these directly affect the claim of a viable alternative.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Tables] Tables presenting MCMC posteriors should include the corresponding ΛCDM baseline values for direct comparison.
  2. [Evolution equations] Clarify the exact form of the interaction term in the non-minimal case to avoid ambiguity in the evolution equations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and will revise the paper accordingly to strengthen the statistical and physical claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and results section] Abstract and results section: the central claim that viscous models yield 'improved fits' over ΛCDM is not supported by any reported χ² values, Δχ², AIC/BIC, or effective degrees of freedom in the provided description, despite the introduction of two additional free parameters; without these metrics the statistical preference cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that explicit reporting of χ², Δχ², AIC, and BIC is required to substantiate the claim of improved fits, especially given the two extra parameters. Although the MCMC analysis was performed and likelihood comparisons underlie the stated preference, these quantitative metrics were not tabulated in the results section. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated table (or subsection) presenting the minimum χ² values for each model, the differences relative to ΛCDM, and the corresponding AIC/BIC penalties, allowing readers to assess the statistical robustness directly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methodology and discussion] Methodology and discussion: the physical viability of the bulk viscosity coefficient and non-minimal coupling as a dark energy description requires explicit checks that the best-fit parameters produce no violations of energy conditions or instabilities in the perturbation equations, as these directly affect the claim of a viable alternative.

    Authors: We concur that viability checks are essential. The current text focuses on background evolution and observational constraints but does not explicitly verify the null energy condition, dominant energy condition, or the absence of gradient instabilities/ghosts in the perturbation sector for the best-fit parameter values. In the revised version we will add a new subsection (or appendix) that evaluates these conditions at the posterior means and discusses the effective sound speed and perturbation equations for both the minimal and non-minimal cases, thereby confirming or qualifying the physical acceptability of the models. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper constrains a bulk-viscous dark-energy model via standard MCMC fits to external datasets (SNe Ia, DESI DR2 BAO, Planck 2018 CMB) and reports improved chi-squared relative to ΛCDM. No derivation step is shown to reduce by construction to a fitted input renamed as prediction, a self-definitional relation, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. The background evolution equations are conventional; the data combination is independent of the model parameters. This constitutes normal model comparison against external benchmarks rather than circular reasoning.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on fitting viscosity and coupling parameters to observations under standard cosmological assumptions; the viscous fluid itself is postulated without independent evidence.

free parameters (2)
  • bulk viscosity coefficient
    Fitted to data to produce the observed acceleration
  • non-minimal coupling strength
    Adjusted to improve fits in the interacting scenario
axioms (2)
  • standard math FLRW metric and standard Friedmann equations govern background expansion
    Invoked as the cosmological framework for all calculations
  • domain assumption Bulk viscosity can be treated as an effective fluid description of dark energy
    Core modeling choice that allows dissipative effects to replace the cosmological constant
invented entities (1)
  • bulk viscous dark energy fluid no independent evidence
    purpose: To supply a dissipative mechanism for late-time acceleration
    Postulated entity introduced to explain observations; no independent falsifiable evidence provided

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5645 in / 1407 out tokens · 44178 ms · 2026-06-28T00:29:29.854916+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

160 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    To explore the role of viscosity in the evolution of the universe, we consider two cases: minimal interaction and non-minimal interaction. A. Minimal Interaction In the minimal interaction scenario, the different com- ponents of the Universe (radiation, matter, and vis- cous dark energy), evolve independently and satisfy the standard conservation laws. Co...

    arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    A. G. R. et al., Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Con- stant, Astron. J.116, 1009 (1998), astro-ph/9805201

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [4]

    S. Alamet al.(eBOSS), Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory, Phys. Rev. D103, 083533 (2021), 2007.08991

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  4. [5]

    Aiola et al

    S. Aiola et al. (ACT), The Atacama Cosmology Tele- scope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters, J. Cos- mol. Astropart. Phys.2020(12), 047, 2007.07288

    arXiv 2020

  5. [8]

    Perlmutter, G

    S. Perlmutter, G. Aldering, G. Goldhaber, R. A. Knop, P. Nugent, P. G. Castro, S. Deustua, S. Fabbro, A. Goo- bar, D. E. Groom, I. M. Hook, A. G. Kim, M. Y. Kim, J. C. Lee, N. J. Nunes, R. Pain, C. R. Pennypacker, R. Quimby, C. Lidman, R. S. Ellis, M. Irwin, R. G. McMahon, P. Ruiz-Lapuente, N. Walton, B. Schaefer, B. J. Boyle, A. V. Filippenko, T. Matheso...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  6. [9]

    coincidence problem

    H. E. S. Velten, R. F. vom Marttens, and W. Zimdahl, Aspects of the cosmological “coincidence problem”, Eu- ropean Physical Journal C74, 3160 (2014), 1410.2509

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  7. [10]

    Zheng, Y

    J. Zheng, Y. Chen, T. Xu, and Z.-H. Zhu, Diagnosing the cosmic coincidence problem and its evolution with recent observations, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2107.08916 (2021), 2107.08916

    arXiv 2021

  8. [11]

    J. Sol` a Peracaula, The cosmological constant problem and running vacuum in the expanding universe, Philo- sophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A380, 20210182 (2022), 2203.13757

    arXiv 2022

  9. [12]

    I. L. Shapiro and J. Sol` a, Cosmological constant problems and the renormalization group, Journal of Physics A Mathematical General40, 6583 (2007), gr- qc/0611055

    arXiv 2007

  10. [13]

    C. D. Huang, A. G. Riess, W. Yuan, L. M. Macri, N. L. Zakamska, S. Casertano, P. A. Whitelock, S. L. Hoffmann, A. V. Filippenko, and D. Scolnic, Hubble Space Telescope Observations of Mira Variables in the SN Ia Host NGC 1559: An Alternative Candle to Mea- sure the Hubble Constant, Astrophys. J.889, 5 (2020), 1908.10883

    arXiv 2020

  11. [14]

    J. P. Blakeslee, J. B. Jensen, C.-P. Ma, P. A. Milne, and J. E. Greene, The Hubble Constant from Infrared Surface Brightness Fluctuation Distances, Astrophys. J. 911, 65 (2021), 2101.02221

    arXiv 2021

  12. [15]

    Garnavich, C

    P. Garnavich, C. M. Wood, P. Milne, J. B. Jensen, J. P. Blakeslee, P. J. Brown, D. Scolnic, B. Rose, and D. Brout, Connecting Infrared Surface Brightness Fluc- tuation Distances to Type Ia Supernova Hosts: Testing the Top Rung of the Distance Ladder, Astrophys. J. 953, 35 (2023), 2204.12060

    arXiv 2023

  13. [16]

    de Jaeger, L

    T. de Jaeger, L. Galbany, A. G. Riess, B. E. Stahl, B. J. Shappee, A. V. Filippenko, and W. Zheng, A 5 per cent measurement of the Hubble-Lemaˆ ıtre constant from Type II supernovae, MNRAS514, 4620 (2022), 2203.08974

    arXiv 2022

  14. [17]

    D. W. Pesce, J. A. Braatz, M. J. Reid, A. G. Riess, D. Scolnic, J. J. Condon, F. Gao, C. Henkel, C. M. V. Impellizzeri, C. Y. Kuo, and K. Y. Lo, The Megamaser Cosmology Project. XIII. Combined Hubble Constant Constraints, apjl891, L1 (2020), 2001.09213

    arXiv 2020

  15. [18]

    Kourkchi, R

    E. Kourkchi, R. B. Tully, G. S. Anand, H. M. Cour- tois, A. Dupuy, J. D. Neill, L. Rizzi, and M. Seibert, Cosmicflows-4: The Calibration of Optical and Infrared Tully-Fisher Relations, Astrophys. J.896, 3 (2020), 2004.14499

    arXiv 2020

  16. [19]

    Fern´ andez Arenas, E

    D. Fern´ andez Arenas, E. Terlevich, R. Terlevich, J. Mel- nick, R. Ch´ avez, F. Bresolin, E. Telles, M. Plionis, and S. Basilakos, An independent determination of the local Hubble constant, MNRAS474, 1250 (2018), 1710.05951

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [20]

    Birrer, M

    S. Birrer, M. Millon, D. Sluse, A. J. Shajib, F. Courbin, S. Erickson, L. V. E. Koopmans, S. H. Suyu, and T. Treu, Time-Delay Cosmography: Measuring the Hubble Constant and Other Cosmological Parameters with Strong Gravitational Lensing, ssr220, 48 (2024), 2210.10833

    arXiv 2024

  18. [21]

    Moresco, L

    M. Moresco, L. Amati, L. Amendola, S. Birrer, J. P. Blakeslee, M. Cantiello, A. Cimatti, J. Darling, M. Della Valle, M. Fishbach, C. Grillo, N. Hamaus, D. Holz, L. Izzo, R. Jimenez, E. Lusso, M. Meneghetti, E. Piedipalumbo, A. Pisani, A. Pourtsidou, L. Pozzetti, M. Quartin, G. Risaliti, P. Rosati, and L. Verde, Un- veiling the Universe with emerging cosmo...

    arXiv 2022

  19. [22]

    S. M. Ward, S. Thorp, K. S. Mandel, S. Dhawan, D. O. Jones, K. Taggart, R. J. Foley, G. Narayan, K. C. Cham- bers, D. A. Coulter, K. W. Davis, T. de Boer, K. de Soto, N. Earl, A. Gagliano, H. Gao, J. Hjorth, M. E. Hu- ber, L. Izzo, D. Langeroodi, E. A. Magnier, P. McGill, A. Rest, C. Rojas-Bravo, R. Wojtak, and Young Su- pernova Experiment, Relative Intri...

    arXiv 2023

  20. [23]

    R. B. Tully, E. Kourkchi, H. M. Courtois, G. S. Anand, J. P. Blakeslee, D. Brout, T. d. Jaeger, A. Dupuy, D. Guinet, C. Howlett, J. B. Jensen, D. Pomar` ede, L. Rizzi, D. Rubin, K. Said, D. Scolnic, and B. E. Stahl, Cosmicflows-4, Astrophys. J.944, 94 (2023), 2209.11238

    arXiv 2023

  21. [24]

    J. L. Sanders, The period-luminosity relation for Mira variables in the Milky Way using Gaia DR3: a fur- ther distance anchor for H 0, MNRAS523, 2369 (2023), 2304.01671

    arXiv 2023

  22. [25]

    W. L. Freedman, Measurements of the Hubble Con- stant: Tensions in Perspective, Astrophys. J.919, 16 (2021), 2106.15656

    arXiv 2021

  23. [26]

    G. S. Anand, R. B. Tully, L. Rizzi, A. G. Riess, and W. Yuan, Comparing Tip of the Red Giant Branch Distance Scales: An Independent Reduction of the Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program and the Value of the Hubble Constant, Astrophys. J.932, 15 (2022), 2108.00007

    arXiv 2022

  24. [27]

    A. J. Shajib, P. Mozumdar, G. C. F. Chen, T. Treu, M. Cappellari, S. Knabel, S. H. Suyu, V. N. Ben- nert, J. A. Frieman, D. Sluse, S. Birrer, F. Courbin, C. D. Fassnacht, L. Villafa˜ na, and P. R. Williams, TD- COSMO. XII. Improved Hubble constant measurement from lensing time delays using spatially resolved stel- lar kinematics of the lens galaxy, Astron...

    arXiv 2023

  25. [28]

    Scolnic, A

    D. Scolnic, A. G. Riess, J. Wu, S. Li, G. S. Anand, R. Beaton, S. Casertano, R. I. Anderson, S. Dhawan, and X. Ke, CATS: The Hubble Constant from Stan- dardized TRGB and Type Ia Supernova Measurements, apjl954, L31 (2023), 2304.06693

    arXiv 2023

  26. [29]

    R. I. Anderson, N. W. Koblischke, and L. Eyer, Small- amplitude Red Giants Elucidate the Nature of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch as a Standard Candle, apjl 963, L43 (2024), 2303.04790

    arXiv 2024

  27. [30]

    E. A. et al., Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies, Journal 13 of High Energy Astrophysics34, 49 (2022), 2203.06142

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  28. [31]

    Perivolaropoulos and F

    L. Perivolaropoulos and F. Skara, Challenges for ΛCDM: An update, nar95, 101659 (2022), 2105.05208

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  29. [32]

    E. D. V. et al, Cosmology Intertwined II: The hub- ble constant tension, Astroparticle Physics131, 102605 (2021), 2008.11284

    arXiv 2021

  30. [33]

    Verde, T

    L. Verde, T. Treu, and A. G. Riess, Tensions between the early and late Universe, Nature Astronomy3, 891 (2019), 1907.10625

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  31. [34]

    Knox and M

    L. Knox and M. Millea, Hubble constant hunter’s guide, Phys. Rev. D101, 043533 (2020), 1908.03663

    arXiv 2020

  32. [35]

    Jedamzik, L

    K. Jedamzik, L. Pogosian, and G.-B. Zhao, Why re- ducing the cosmic sound horizon alone can not fully resolve the Hubble tension, Communications Physics4, 123 (2021), 2010.04158

    arXiv 2021

  33. [36]

    Di Valentino, O

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri, D. F. Mota, A. G. Riess, and J. Silk, In the realm of the Hubble tension-a review of so- lutions, Classical and Quantum Gravity38, 153001 (2021), 2103.01183

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  34. [37]

    P. Shah, P. Lemos, and O. Lahav, A buyer’s guide to the Hubble constant, aapr29, 9 (2021), 2109.01161

    arXiv 2021

  35. [38]

    Kamionkowski and A

    M. Kamionkowski and A. G. Riess, The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science73, 153 (2023), 2211.04492

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  36. [39]

    T. M. C. A. et al. (DES), Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing, Phys. Rev. D105, 023520 (2022), 2105.13549

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  37. [40]

    T. M. C. A. et al. (DES), Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Constraints on extensions to Λ CDM with weak lensing and galaxy clustering, Phys. Rev. D107, 083504 (2023), 2207.05766

    arXiv 2023

  38. [41]

    M. A. et al. (KiDS), KiDS-1000 cosmology: Cosmic shear constraints and comparison between two point statistics, Astron. & Astrophys.645, A104 (2021), 2007.15633

    arXiv 2021

  39. [42]

    Dvali, G

    G. Dvali, G. Gabadadze, and M. Porrati, 4D gravity on a brane in 5D Minkowski space, Physics Letters B485, 208 (2000), hep-th/0005016

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  40. [43]

    Deffayet, Cosmology on a brane in Minkowski bulk, Physics Letters B502, 199 (2001), hep-th/0010186

    C. Deffayet, Cosmology on a brane in Minkowski bulk, Physics Letters B502, 199 (2001), hep-th/0010186

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  41. [44]

    Deffayet, G

    C. Deffayet, G. Dvali, and G. Gabadadze, Accelerated universe from gravity leaking to extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D65, 044023 (2002), astro-ph/0105068

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  42. [45]

    Sahni and Y

    V. Sahni and Y. Shtanov, Braneworld models of dark en- ergy, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2003(11), 014, astro- ph/0202346

    arXiv 2003

  43. [46]

    Zhang and Z.-H

    H. Zhang and Z.-H. Zhu, Interacting Chaplygin gas, Phys. Rev. D73, 043518 (2006), astro-ph/0509895

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  44. [47]

    Li, A model of holographic dark energy, Physics Let- ters B603, 1 (2004), hep-th/0403127

    M. Li, A model of holographic dark energy, Physics Let- ters B603, 1 (2004), hep-th/0403127

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  45. [48]

    Nojiri and S

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Unifying phantom infla- tion with late-time acceleration: scalar phantom-non- phantom transition model and generalized holographic dark energy, General Relativity and Gravitation38, 1285 (2006), hep-th/0506212

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  46. [49]

    C. Gao, F. Wu, X. Chen, and Y.-G. Shen, Holographic dark energy model from Ricci scalar curvature, Phys. Rev. D79, 043511 (2009), 0712.1394

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  47. [50]

    S. M. Carroll, V. Duvvuri, M. Trodden, and M. S. Turner, Is cosmic speed-up due to new gravitational physics?, Phys. Rev. D70, 043528 (2004), astro- ph/0306438

    arXiv 2004

  48. [51]

    Hu and I

    W. Hu and I. Sawicki, Models of f(R) cosmic acceler- ation that evade solar system tests, Phys. Rev. D76, 064004 (2007), 0705.1158

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  49. [52]

    Nojiri and S

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Modified f(R) gravity con- sistent with realistic cosmology: From a matter domi- nated epoch to a dark energy universe, Phys. Rev. D 74, 086005 (2006), hep-th/0608008

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  50. [53]

    De Felice and S

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, f( R) Theories, Living Reviews in Relativity13, 3 (2010), 1002.4928

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  51. [54]

    S. Alam, S. Sen, and S. Sengupta, Absence of antisym- metric tensor fields: Clue from f(R) model of gravity, Annals Phys.489, 170420 (2026), 2403.02771

    arXiv 2026

  52. [55]

    Ratra and P

    B. Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles, Cosmological Conse- quences of a Rolling Homogeneous Scalar Field, Phys. Rev. D37, 3406 (1988)

    1988

  53. [56]

    P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, The Cosmological Con- stant and Dark Energy, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 559 (2003), astro-ph/0207347

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  54. [57]

    Kamenshchik, U

    A. Kamenshchik, U. Moschella, and V. Pasquier, An alternative to quintessence, Physics Letters B511, 265 (2001), gr-qc/0103004

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  55. [58]

    Amendola, Coupled quintessence, Phys

    L. Amendola, Coupled quintessence, Phys. Rev. D62, 043511 (2000), astro-ph/9908023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  56. [59]

    B. Wang, Y. Gong, and E. Abdalla, Transition of the dark energy equation of state in an interacting holo- graphic dark energy model, Physics Letters B624, 141 (2005), hep-th/0506069

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  57. [60]

    J. C. Fabris, S. V. B. Goncalves, and P. E. de Souza, Fitting the Supernova Type Ia Data with the Chaplygin Gas, arXiv e-prints , astro-ph/0207430 (2002), astro- ph/0207430

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  58. [61]

    Bili´ c, G

    N. Bili´ c, G. B. Tupper, and R. D. Viollier, inDark Matter in Astro- and Particle Physics, DARK 2002, edited by H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus and R. D. Vio- llier (2002) pp. 306–311, astro-ph/0207423

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  59. [62]

    M. C. Bento, O. Bertolami, and A. A. Sen, Generalized Chaplygin gas, accelerated expansion, and dark-energy- matter unification, Phys. Rev. D66, 043507 (2002), gr- qc/0202064

    arXiv 2002

  60. [63]

    H. B. Benaoum, Accelerated Universe from Modified Chaplygin Gas and Tachyonic Fluid, arXiv e-prints , hep-th/0205140 (2002), hep-th/0205140

    arXiv 2002

  61. [64]

    Deng, A Modified Generalized Chaplygin Gas as the Unified Dark Matter-Dark Energy Revisited, Brazil- ian Journal of Physics41, 333 (2011), 1110.1913

    X.-M. Deng, A Modified Generalized Chaplygin Gas as the Unified Dark Matter-Dark Energy Revisited, Brazil- ian Journal of Physics41, 333 (2011), 1110.1913

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  62. [65]

    A. G. Adameet al.(DESI), DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations, JCAP2025(02), 021, 2404.03002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  63. [66]

    G´ omez-Valent, Z

    A. G´ omez-Valent, Z. Zheng, L. Amendola, V. Pettorino, and C. Wetterich, Early dark energy in the pre- and postrecombination epochs, Phys. Rev. D104, 083536 (2021), 2107.11065

    arXiv 2021

  64. [67]

    G´ omez-Valent, Z

    A. G´ omez-Valent, Z. Zheng, L. Amendola, C. Wetterich, and V. Pettorino, Coupled and uncoupled early dark en- ergy, massive neutrinos, and the cosmological tensions, Phys. Rev. D106, 103522 (2022), 2207.14487

    arXiv 2022

  65. [68]

    Giar` e, M

    W. Giar` e, M. A. Sabogal, R. C. Nunes, and E. Di Valentino, Interacting Dark Energy after DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 251003 (2024), 2404.15232

    arXiv 2024

  66. [69]

    K. V. Berghaus, J. A. Kable, and V. Miranda, Quanti- fying scalar field dynamics with DESI 2024 Y1 BAO measurements, Phys. Rev. D110, 103524 (2024), 2404.14341. 14

    arXiv 2024

  67. [70]

    W. J. Wolf, C. Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa, and P. G. Ferreira, Ro- bustness of dark energy phenomenology across different parameterizations, JCAP2025(05), 034, 2502.04929

    arXiv

  68. [71]

    D. H. Lee, W. Yang, E. Di Valentino, S. Pan, and C. van de Bruck, The Shape of Dark Energy: Con- straining Its Evolution with a General Parametrization (2025), 2507.11432

    arXiv 2025

  69. [72]

    Zhong and B

    K. Zhong and B. Jain, Tests of Evolving Dark En- ergy with Geometric Probes of the Late-Time Universe (2025), 2509.26480

    arXiv 2025

  70. [73]

    Z. Yao, G. Ye, and A. Silvestri, A General Model for Dark Energy Crossing the Phantom Divide (2025), 2508.01378

    arXiv 2025

  71. [74]

    F. J. Qu, K. M. Surrao, B. Bolliet, J. C. Hill, B. D. Sher- win, H. T. Jense, and A. La Posta, Accelerated inference on accelerated cosmic expansion: New constraints on axionlike early dark energy with DESI BAO and ACT DR6 CMB lensing, Phys. Rev. D111, 123507 (2025), 2404.16805

    arXiv 2025

  72. [75]

    Wang and Y.-S

    H. Wang and Y.-S. Piao, Dark energy in light of recent DESI BAO and Hubble tension (2024), 2404.18579

    arXiv 2024

  73. [76]

    Giar` e, M

    W. Giar` e, M. Najafi, S. Pan, E. Di Valentino, and J. T. Firouzjaee, Robust preference for Dynamical Dark En- ergy in DESI BAO and SN measurements, JCAP2024 (10), 035, 2407.16689

    arXiv

  74. [77]

    I. D. Gialamas, G. H¨ utsi, K. Kannike, A. Racioppi, M. Raidal, M. Vasar, and H. Veerm¨ ae, Interpreting DESI 2024 BAO: Late-time dynamical dark energy or a local effect?, Phys. Rev. D111, 043540 (2025), 2406.07533

    arXiv 2024

  75. [78]

    Shlivko and P

    D. Shlivko and P. J. Steinhardt, Assessing observational constraints on dark energy, Phys. Lett. B855, 138826 (2024), 2405.03933

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  76. [79]

    G. Ye, M. Martinelli, B. Hu, and A. Silvestri, Hints of Nonminimally Coupled Gravity in DESI 2024 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 181002 (2025), 2407.15832

    arXiv 2024

  77. [80]

    Akthar and M

    S. Akthar and M. W. Hossain, General parametriza- tion for energy density of quintessence field, JCAP2025 (04), 024, 2411.15892

    arXiv

  78. [81]

    Park and B

    C.-G. Park and B. Ratra, Is excess smoothing of Planck CMB ansiotropy data partially responsible for evi- dence for dark energy dynamics in otherw(z)CDM parametrizations? (2025), 2501.03480

    arXiv 2025

  79. [82]

    A. G. Ferrari, M. Ballardini, F. Finelli, and D. Paoletti, Scalar-tensor gravity and DESI 2024 BAO data, Phys. Rev. D111, 083523 (2025), 2501.15298

    arXiv 2024

  80. [83]

    Sohail, S

    S. Sohail, S. Alam, S. Akthar, and M. W. Hossain, Quintessential early dark energy, Phys. Dark Univ.48, 101948 (2025), 2408.03229

    arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.