pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.06283 · v1 · pith:PIZWVZIVnew · submitted 2026-06-04 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th· nucl-th

Diffusion of multiple conserved charges from entropy production

Samapan Bhadury , Arpan Das , Sandeep Chatterjee , Hiranmaya Mishra This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 00:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-thnucl-th
keywords relativistic hydrodynamicsdiffusion matrixconserved chargesChapman-Enskogquark-gluon plasmatransport coefficientsentropy productionheavy-ion collisions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Entropy production in a dissipative multi-charge system determines the full diffusion matrix for baryon number, electric charge and strangeness in relativistic hydrodynamics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives first- and second-order dissipative hydrodynamic equations for a system carrying three conserved charges by solving the relativistic Boltzmann equation via the Chapman-Enskog method in the relaxation-time approximation. It imposes the requirement that entropy must increase, which fixes the form of the out-of-equilibrium corrections and thereby yields explicit expressions for the shear and bulk viscosities together with the full 3-by-3 diffusion matrix κ_qq′ whose entries couple the flows of B, Q and S. These matrix elements are then evaluated for a (2+1)-flavor quark-gluon plasma as functions of temperature and chemical potentials, and their magnitude relative to shear viscosity is quantified across a range of conditions relevant to heavy-ion collisions.

Core claim

Within the kinetic-theory framework the Chapman-Enskog expansion of the distribution function, constrained by the H-theorem, produces a diffusion matrix κ_qq′ whose diagonal and off-diagonal elements are fixed once the entropy-production condition is enforced at both first and second order in gradients; the resulting matrix governs the coupled diffusion of baryon number, electric charge and strangeness and is evaluated numerically for the quark-gluon plasma.

What carries the argument

Chapman-Enskog expansion of the distribution function around local equilibrium, with the entropy-production (H-theorem) constraint fixing the transport coefficients including the diffusion matrix κ_qq′.

If this is right

  • The diffusion matrix supplies the necessary transport coefficients for hydrodynamic modeling of multi-component charge diffusion driven by initial-state baryon stopping.
  • Numerical estimates give the temperature and chemical-potential dependence of all nine elements of κ_qq′ for a (2+1)-flavor plasma.
  • The ratio κ_qq′ T / η quantifies when diffusion competes with or dominates shear viscosity in the hydrodynamic evolution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same entropy-production constraint can be applied to other collision kernels or to higher-order gradient expansions to generate consistent higher-order transport coefficients.
  • The off-diagonal elements of κ_qq′ imply that gradients in one charge density can drive currents of the other two charges, altering predictions for net-charge fluctuations and flow.
  • Embedding these matrix elements in event-by-event hydrodynamic simulations would allow quantitative tests against measured charge-dependent observables in heavy-ion data.

Load-bearing premise

The collision term is approximated by a momentum-independent relaxation time.

What would settle it

A direct lattice-QCD or experimental extraction of the diffusion matrix elements at a given temperature and chemical potential that deviates systematically from the entropy-production values obtained in the paper.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.06283 by Arpan Das, Hiranmaya Mishra, Samapan Bhadury, Sandeep Chatterjee.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Temperature dependence of the scaled diagonal (first row) and off-diagonal (second row) components of the conductivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Temperature dependence of the scaled diagonal (first row) and off-diagonal components (second row) of the conductivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Ratios of charge conductivities to shear viscosity scaled by the temperature, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Ratios of thermal conductivity to shear viscosity, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We derive dissipative relativistic hydrodynamic equations in the presence of multiple conserved charges, i.e., baryon number ($B$), electric charge ($Q$), and strangeness ($S$), using the Chapman-Enskog (CE) method within the kinetic theory approach. The relativistic Boltzmann equation is solved within the relaxation-time approximation with a momentum-independent relaxation time in the collision term. We derive both first-order (Navier-Stokes limit) and second-order dissipative hydrodynamic equations. Within the kinetic theory framework, using the Boltzmann's H-theorem, and by demanding that for a dissipative system, the entropy must be produced, we find different transport coefficients at the first-order and second-order gradient expansion of the out-of-equilibrium distribution function around the local equilibrium. Apart from the well-known transport coefficients, the shear ($\eta$) and the bulk ($\zeta$) viscosities , we also find the diffusion matrix elements ($\kappa_{qq^{\prime}}$) for the conserved charges $B$, $Q$ and $S$. The diffusion matrix elements ($\kappa_{qq^{\prime}}$) are important to model the multi-component diffusion dynamics sourced by inhomogeneous baryon stopping in the initial state of heavy-ion collisions. We estimate the temperature ($T$) and chemical potential dependence of diagonal and off-diagonal elements of the diffusion matrix elements for the (2+1) flavor quark-gluon plasma. We further estimate the ratio $\kappa_{qq^{\prime}}T/\eta$ for a wide range of temperature and chemical potentials to show the relative importance of the diffusion matrix elements compared to other transport coefficients.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives first- and second-order dissipative relativistic hydrodynamic equations for a system with three conserved charges (baryon number B, electric charge Q, strangeness S) by applying the Chapman-Enskog expansion to the relativistic Boltzmann equation in the relaxation-time approximation. The collision term uses a single momentum-independent relaxation time τ. Transport coefficients, including the shear and bulk viscosities and the full diffusion matrix κ_qq', are fixed by imposing positive entropy production via the H-theorem. Numerical estimates of the T- and μ-dependence of the diagonal and off-diagonal κ_qq' elements, together with the ratios κ_qq'T/η, are presented for a (2+1)-flavor quark-gluon plasma.

Significance. If the central approximations hold, the work supplies explicit kinetic-theory expressions for multi-charge diffusion coefficients that are directly relevant to modeling baryon-stopping-driven diffusion in heavy-ion collisions. The use of the entropy-production constraint to obtain distinct coefficients at first and second order is a clear methodological strength and is credited here.

major comments (2)
  1. [Chapman-Enskog expansion and collision term] The solution of the Boltzmann equation employs a momentum-independent relaxation time in the RTA collision term. Because the diffusion currents are momentum-weighted integrals over the charge carriers, this choice directly determines the deviation δf and therefore fixes all elements of the diffusion matrix κ_qq' (both diagonal and off-diagonal). No estimate or bound on the systematic error introduced by the p-independent τ is given, which is load-bearing for the reported T- and μ-dependence and for the ratios κT/η.
  2. [Results on T- and μ-dependence] The numerical estimates of the diffusion matrix elements and their comparison to η rest on the same RTA assumption without any sensitivity analysis to a momentum-dependent relaxation time (as would arise from QCD scattering rates). This leaves the quantitative claims about the relative importance of diffusion untested against the dominant source of uncertainty in the derivation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'different transport coefficients' are found at first and second order but does not indicate which coefficients (beyond the already-known viscosities) change or by how much.
  2. [Notation and definitions] Notation for the diffusion matrix κ_qq' should be cross-referenced to existing literature on multi-charge hydrodynamics to clarify the precise relation to the diffusion currents.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Chapman-Enskog expansion and collision term] The solution of the Boltzmann equation employs a momentum-independent relaxation time in the RTA collision term. Because the diffusion currents are momentum-weighted integrals over the charge carriers, this choice directly determines the deviation δf and therefore fixes all elements of the diffusion matrix κ_qq' (both diagonal and off-diagonal). No estimate or bound on the systematic error introduced by the p-independent τ is given, which is load-bearing for the reported T- and μ-dependence and for the ratios κT/η.

    Authors: We agree that the momentum-independent relaxation time constitutes a central approximation whose consequences propagate directly into the diffusion matrix. This choice is made to obtain closed analytic expressions within the Chapman-Enskog expansion, consistent with many prior RTA studies. The T- and μ-dependence of κ_qq' is nevertheless driven primarily by the equilibrium distributions and thermodynamic quantities rather than by the constant value of τ itself. We acknowledge that no quantitative error bound is supplied. In the revised manuscript we will insert a dedicated paragraph discussing the limitations of the constant-τ assumption and citing works that employ momentum-dependent relaxation times extracted from QCD matrix elements. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on T- and μ-dependence] The numerical estimates of the diffusion matrix elements and their comparison to η rest on the same RTA assumption without any sensitivity analysis to a momentum-dependent relaxation time (as would arise from QCD scattering rates). This leaves the quantitative claims about the relative importance of diffusion untested against the dominant source of uncertainty in the derivation.

    Authors: The reported numerical results are obtained strictly inside the constant-τ RTA framework described in the paper. Performing a systematic sensitivity analysis to a momentum-dependent τ would require an entirely different numerical implementation and lies outside the analytic scope of the present work. We will nevertheless revise the discussion of the ratios κ_qq'T/η to emphasize that the values are indicative within the adopted approximation and to caution that more microscopic calculations are needed for quantitative precision. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained from Boltzmann equation

full rationale

The paper solves the relativistic Boltzmann equation in the relaxation-time approximation (RTA) with momentum-independent τ via Chapman-Enskog expansion, then applies the H-theorem and entropy-production requirement to obtain first- and second-order transport coefficients including the diffusion matrix κ_qq'. These coefficients emerge as explicit integrals over the deviation δf; they are not fitted to data, not renamed known results, and not justified by self-citation chains. The ratio κT/η is computed within the same model and cancels the common τ factor. No step reduces by construction to its own inputs, and the RTA is stated as an explicit approximation rather than smuggled in via citation. The derivation is therefore independent of the target quantities.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on the relativistic Boltzmann equation, the relaxation-time approximation, and the requirement of positive entropy production; the relaxation time is an external parameter whose value is not fixed by the paper.

free parameters (1)
  • relaxation time τ
    Momentum-independent relaxation time appearing in the collision term; its value or functional dependence is not specified in the abstract but controls the magnitude of all transport coefficients.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The system is described by the relativistic Boltzmann equation
    Starting point for the kinetic-theory derivation of hydrodynamics.
  • domain assumption Boltzmann's H-theorem determines the sign of entropy production in the dissipative case
    Invoked to constrain the form of the transport coefficients.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5818 in / 1426 out tokens · 40001 ms · 2026-06-28T00:32:28.427067+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 46 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    P. F. Kolb, P. Huovinen, U. W. Heinz, and H. Heiselberg, Phys. Lett. B500, 232 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0012137. 20

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  2. [2]

    Ollitrault, Eur

    J.-Y. Ollitrault, Eur. J. Phys.29, 275 (2008), arXiv:0708.2433 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  3. [3]

    Schenke, S

    B. Schenke, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 042301 (2011), arXiv:1009.3244 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  4. [4]

    Romatschke, Int

    P. Romatschke, Int. J. Mod. Phys.E19, 1 (2010), arXiv:0902.3663 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  5. [5]

    Huovinen and P

    P. Huovinen and P. Petreczky, J. Phys. G38, 124103 (2011), arXiv:1106.6227 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  6. [6]

    Jaiswal and V

    A. Jaiswal and V. Roy, Adv. High Energy Phys.2016, 9623034 (2016), arXiv:1605.08694 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Florkowski, M

    W. Florkowski, M. P. Heller, and M. Spalinski, Rept. Prog. Phys.81, 046001 (2018), arXiv:1707.02282 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Romatschke and U

    P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke,Relativistic Fluid Dynamics In and Out of Equilibrium, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2019) arXiv:1712.05815 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    J. A. Fotakis, M. Greif, C. Greiner, G. S. Denicol, and H. Niemi, Phys. Rev. D101, 076007 (2020), arXiv:1912.09103 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    R. S. Bhalerao, Eur. Phys. J. ST230, 635 (2021), arXiv:2009.09586 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    A. M. Halasz, A. D. Jackson, R. E. Shrock, M. A. Stephanov, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, Phys. Rev. D58, 096007 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9804290

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  12. [12]

    Y. Aoki, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and K. K. Szabo, Nature443, 675 (2006), arXiv:hep-lat/0611014

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  13. [13]

    Borsanyi, Z

    S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo (Wuppertal-Budapest), JHEP09, 073 (2010), arXiv:1005.3508 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  14. [14]

    Bazavovet al., Phys

    A. Bazavovet al., Phys. Rev. D85, 054503 (2012), arXiv:1111.1710 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  15. [15]

    Fukushima and C

    K. Fukushima and C. Sasaki, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.72, 99 (2013), arXiv:1301.6377 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  16. [16]

    Fukushima and T

    K. Fukushima and T. Hatsuda, Rept. Prog. Phys.74, 014001 (2011), arXiv:1005.4814 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  17. [17]

    M. A. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal, and E. V. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 4816 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9806219

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  18. [18]

    M. A. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal, and E. V. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. D60, 114028 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9903292

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  19. [19]

    M. M. Aggarwalet al.(STAR), arXiv1007.2613

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Mohanty (STAR), J

    B. Mohanty (STAR), J. Phys. G38, 124023 (2011), arXiv:1106.5902 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  21. [21]

    J. T. Mitchell (PHENIX), Nucl. Phys. A904-905, 903c (2013), arXiv:1211.6139 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2013

  22. [22]

    Rajagopal, G

    K. Rajagopal, G. Ridgway, R. Weller, and Y. Yin, Phys. Rev. D102, 094025 (2020), arXiv:1908.08539 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Martinez, T

    M. Martinez, T. Sch¨ afer, and V. Skokov, Phys. Rev. D100, 074017 (2019), arXiv:1906.11306 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    T. Dore, J. Noronha-Hostler, and E. McLaughlin, Phys. Rev. D102, 074017 (2020), arXiv:2007.15083 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Grefa, M

    J. Grefa, M. Hippert, J. Noronha, J. Noronha-Hostler, I. Portillo, C. Ratti, and R. Rougemont, Phys. Rev. D106, 034024 (2022), arXiv:2203.00139 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Jeon and L

    S. Jeon and L. G. Yaffe, Phys. Rev. D53, 5799 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9512263

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  27. [27]

    G. S. Denicol, W. Florkowski, R. Ryblewski, and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev.C90, 044905 (2014), arXiv:1407.4767 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  28. [28]

    Jaiswal, R

    A. Jaiswal, R. Ryblewski, and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. C90, 044908 (2014), arXiv:1407.7231 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  29. [29]

    Florkowski, B

    W. Florkowski, B. Friman, A. Jaiswal, and E. Speranza, Phys. Rev. C97, 041901 (2018), arXiv:1705.00587 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    Mykhaylova, M

    V. Mykhaylova, M. Bluhm, K. Redlich, and C. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D100, 034002 (2019), arXiv:1906.01697 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    Plumberget al., Phys

    C. Plumberget al., Phys. Rev. C111, 044905 (2025), arXiv:2405.09648 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Jaiswal, B

    A. Jaiswal, B. Friman, and K. Redlich, Phys. Lett. B751, 548 (2015), arXiv:1507.02849 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  33. [33]

    G. S. Denicol, C. Gale, S. Jeon, A. Monnai, B. Schenke, and C. Shen, Phys. Rev. C98, 034916 (2018), arXiv:1804.10557 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    M. A. Stephanov, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.153, 139 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0402115

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  35. [35]

    Kapusta, B

    J. Kapusta, B. Muller, and M. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. C85, 054906 (2012), arXiv:1112.6405 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  36. [36]

    Young, J

    C. Young, J. I. Kapusta, C. Gale, S. Jeon, and B. Schenke, Phys. Rev. C91, 044901 (2015), arXiv:1407.1077 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  37. [37]

    Nonaka and M

    C. Nonaka and M. Asakawa, Phys. Rev. C71, 044904 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0410078

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  38. [38]

    Paech and A

    K. Paech and A. Dumitru, Phys. Lett. B623, 200 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0504003

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  39. [39]

    Herold, M

    C. Herold, M. Nahrgang, I. Mishustin, and M. Bleicher, Phys. Rev. C87, 014907 (2013), arXiv:1301.1214 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  40. [40]

    Mukherjee, R

    S. Mukherjee, R. Venugopalan, and Y. Yin, Phys. Rev. C92, 034912 (2015), arXiv:1506.00645 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  41. [41]

    Schenke, S

    B. Schenke, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. C82, 014903 (2010), arXiv:1004.1408 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  42. [42]

    Du and U

    L. Du and U. Heinz, Comput. Phys. Commun.251, 107090 (2020), arXiv:1906.11181 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    Sch¨ afer, I

    A. Sch¨ afer, I. Karpenko, X.-Y. Wu, J. Hammelmann, and H. Elfner (SMASH), Eur. Phys. J. A58, 230 (2022), arXiv:2112.08724 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    L. Du, X. An, and U. Heinz, Phys. Rev. C104, 064904 (2021), arXiv:2107.02302 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    Almaalol, T

    D. Almaalol, T. Dore, and J. Noronha-Hostler, arXiv2209.11210

    arXiv

  46. [46]

    Monnai, B

    A. Monnai, B. Schenke, and C. Shen, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A36, 2130007 (2021), arXiv:2101.11591 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    Monnai, B

    A. Monnai, B. Schenke, and C. Shen, Phys. Rev. C100, 024907 (2019), arXiv:1902.05095 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2019

  48. [48]

    Asakawa and M

    M. Asakawa and M. Kitazawa, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.90, 299 (2016), arXiv:1512.05038 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  49. [49]

    Asakawa, U

    M. Asakawa, U. W. Heinz, and B. Muller, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 2072 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0003169

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2072

  50. [50]

    Martinez, M

    M. Martinez, M. D. Sievert, D. E. Wertepny, and J. Noronha-Hostler, arXiv1911.10272

    arXiv

  51. [51]

    Carzon, M

    P. Carzon, M. Martinez, M. D. Sievert, D. E. Wertepny, and J. Noronha-Hostler, Phys. Rev. C105, 034908 (2022), arXiv:1911.12454 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    Rougemont, J

    R. Rougemont, J. Noronha, and J. Noronha-Hostler, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 202301 (2015), arXiv:1507.06972 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  53. [53]

    Rougemont, R

    R. Rougemont, R. Critelli, J. Noronha-Hostler, J. Noronha, and C. Ratti, Phys. Rev. D96, 014032 (2017), arXiv:1704.05558 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  54. [54]

    T. Dore, J. M. Karthein, I. Long, D. Mroczek, J. Noronha-Hostler, P. Parotto, C. Ratti, and Y. Yamauchi, Phys. Rev. D 106, 094024 (2022), arXiv:2207.04086 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2022

  55. [55]

    Hu and S

    J. Hu and S. Shi, (2022), arXiv:2204.10100 [hep-ph]. 21

    arXiv 2022

  56. [56]

    Greif, J

    M. Greif, J. A. Fotakis, G. S. Denicol, and C. Greiner, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 242301 (2018), arXiv:1711.08680 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  57. [57]

    J.-B. Rose, M. Greif, J. Hammelmann, J. A. Fotakis, G. S. Denicol, H. Elfner, and C. Greiner, Phys. Rev. D101, 114028 (2020), arXiv:2001.10606 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    J. A. Fotakis, O. Soloveva, C. Greiner, O. Kaczmarek, and E. Bratkovskaya, Phys. Rev. D104, 034014 (2021), arXiv:2102.08140 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  59. [59]

    J. A. Fotakis, E. Moln´ ar, H. Niemi, C. Greiner, and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D106, 036009 (2022), arXiv:2203.11549 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2022

  60. [60]

    J. A. Fotakis, J. E. Lohr, and C. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C110, 025204 (2024), arXiv:2402.16552 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Harutyunyan and A

    A. Harutyunyan and A. Sedrakian, Symmetry15, 494 (2023), arXiv:2302.09596 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    S. Dey, A. Jaiswal, and H. Mishra, JHEP12, 192 (2024), arXiv:2404.18718 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    Jain, JHEP03, 101 (2010), arXiv:0912.2228 [hep-th]

    S. Jain, JHEP03, 101 (2010), arXiv:0912.2228 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  64. [64]

    Gladden, V

    L. Gladden, V. Ivo, P. K. Kovtun, and A. O. Starinets, JHEP12, 173 (2025), arXiv:2507.21346 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Cordeiro, F

    I. Cordeiro, F. S. Bemfica, E. Speranza, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D113, 045024 (2026), arXiv:2507.20064 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2026

  66. [66]

    G. S. Denicol, H. Niemi, E. Molnar, and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D85, 114047 (2012), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 91, 039902 (2015)], arXiv:1202.4551 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  67. [67]

    Kushwah, G

    K. Kushwah, G. S. Denicol, and C. V. P. de Brito, Phys. Rev. D113, 036021 (2026), arXiv:2511.14787 [physics.plasm-ph]

    arXiv 2026

  68. [68]

    Jaiswal, Phys

    A. Jaiswal, Phys. Rev.C87, 051901 (2013), arXiv:1302.6311 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  69. [69]

    S. R. De Groot,Relativistic Kinetic Theory. Principles and Applications, edited by W. A. Van Leeuwen and C. G. Van Weert (1980)

    1980

  70. [70]

    Romatschke and U

    P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 172301 (2007), arXiv:0706.1522 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  71. [71]

    A. Das, H. Mishra, and R. K. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D106, 014013 (2022), arXiv:2109.01543 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2022

  72. [72]

    Bhadury, W

    S. Bhadury, W. Florkowski, A. Jaiswal, and R. Ryblewski, Phys. Rev. C102, 064910 (2020), arXiv:2006.14252 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  73. [73]

    Jaiswal, R

    A. Jaiswal, R. S. Bhalerao, and S. Pal, Phys. Rev. C87, 021901 (2013), arXiv:1302.0666 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  74. [74]

    W. A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Annals Phys.151, 466 (1983)

    1983

  75. [75]

    W. A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Phys.Rev.D31, 725 (1985)

    1985

  76. [76]

    W. A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Phys. Rev. D35, 3723 (1987)

    1987

  77. [77]

    Israel and J

    W. Israel and J. M. Stewart, Annals Phys.118, 341 (1979)

    1979

  78. [78]

    Koide, G

    T. Koide, G. S. Denicol, P. Mota, and T. Kodama, Phys. Rev. C75, 034909 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0609117

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  79. [79]

    Baier, P

    R. Baier, P. Romatschke, D. T. Son, A. O. Starinets, and M. A. Stephanov, JHEP0804, 100 (2008), arXiv:0712.2451 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  80. [80]

    A. El, Z. Xu, and C. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C81, 041901 (2010), arXiv:0907.4500 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

Showing first 80 references.