pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.06304 · v1 · pith:E6DDX5NYnew · submitted 2026-06-04 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Eigenmodes of synthetic antiferromagnetic skyrmions

Kauser Zulfiqar , Martin Lang , Samuel J. R. Holt , Swapneel Amit Pathak , Florian Bruckner , Hans Fangohr This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 00:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords synthetic antiferromagnetic skyrmionseigenmodesmicromagnetic simulationsgyrotropic modestranslational modescollective dynamicsinterlayer couplingconfinement geometry
0
0 comments X

The pith

Antiferromagnetic interlayer coupling in skyrmion bilayers produces geometry-dependent gyrotropic and translational eigenmodes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper uses micromagnetic eigenvalue and ringdown simulations to track how antiferromagnetic coupling between two ferromagnetic layers changes the low-frequency excitation spectrum of confined skyrmions. In square geometries the coupling yields two nearly degenerate gyrotropic modes in which both layers rotate with the same sense; rectangular confinement instead produces nearly linear translational motion that arises when the layers gyrate in opposite senses. The same coupling also generates collective standing-wave modes along chains of skyrmions, including breathing oscillations in which the two layers move out of phase, and supports signal propagation along those chains at velocities comparable to single-layer cases.

Core claim

The antiferromagnetic coupling strongly modifies the low-frequency dynamics. The square geometry exhibits two nearly degenerate gyrotropic modes, where in each both layers have the same rotation sense. In rectangular geometries, we instead find nearly linear SAF skyrmion translation emerging from opposite gyration sense in the two layers. These translational modes become the characteristic low-frequency excitations of SAF skyrmion chains. For skyrmion chains, collective translational and breathing modes with standing-wave-like spatial profiles are identified, and the SAF geometry supports breathing oscillations in which the two layers oscillate out of phase, with signal propagation along ext

What carries the argument

Micromagnetic eigenvalue and ringdown simulations of synthetic antiferromagnetic bilayers that track the splitting and reordering of eigenmodes under effective interlayer exchange coupling.

If this is right

  • Square confinement preserves gyrotropic character but renders the two lowest modes nearly degenerate with identical layer rotation senses.
  • Rectangular confinement converts the lowest modes into linear translation driven by opposite gyration senses in the two layers.
  • Skyrmion chains support collective translational modes and both in-phase and out-of-phase breathing modes with standing-wave spatial profiles.
  • Signal propagation occurs along extended SAF skyrmion chains at velocities comparable to those in ferromagnetic chains.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The out-of-phase breathing mode could be selectively excited or detected with layer-resolved probes such as element-specific x-ray microscopy.
  • The geometry-controlled switch from gyration to translation may allow electrical tuning of skyrmion mobility via shape engineering alone.
  • Extending the simulations to include Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction gradients or temperature could test robustness of the translational modes.
  • Comparison of the predicted mode frequencies with broadband microwave absorption spectra on patterned SAF samples would directly test the model.

Load-bearing premise

The micromagnetic continuum model with effective interlayer exchange coupling accurately represents the real bilayer system at the length and time scales of interest without significant atomic-scale effects or defects altering the eigenmode spectrum.

What would settle it

Time-resolved imaging or spectroscopy that either detects the two predicted nearly degenerate same-sense gyrotropic modes in square confinement or the opposite-sense translational mode in rectangular confinement, or fails to find them, would confirm or refute the claimed effect of antiferromagnetic coupling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.06304 by Florian Bruckner, Hans Fangohr, Kauser Zulfiqar, Martin Lang, Samuel J. R. Holt, Swapneel Amit Pathak.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic of geometries and skyrmion distribution studied in this work. Colour indicates the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Power spectral density (PSD) of Néel skyrmion in xy plane for two different excitations. An in-plane excitation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Power spectral density and (b) normal modes for a SAF skyrmion (geometry as in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) PSD and (b) lowest frequency normal modes of a skyrmion in a SAF with sample dimensions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Skyrmion core trajectories for mode A of SAF skyrmion in 32 nm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Schematic of the two skyrmion system confined in a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) System geometry for the five skyrmion study. The dotted lines indicate the region where the excitation pulse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) PSD for 25 skyrmions. (b) Subset of the breathing modes in the 20 GHz band. (c) Spectrum after exciting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Phase amplitude map for the same translational mode of five skyrmions with four different visualisations. (a) hsv to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Breathing modes K to T of the five-skyrmion system discussed in Fig. 7 in the main text. The phase amplitude maps [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Eigenmodes of a single FM skyrmion in a (40 × 40 × 2) nm3 geometry. The first three modes are discussed in detail in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Eigenmodes of a single FM skyrmion in a (32 × 40 × 2) nm3 geometry. Compared to the square geometry, many of the modes show elliptical distortion, see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of the low-frequency gyrotropic and rotational modes for a FM skyrmion in (a) square geometry of size [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Eigenmodes of a single SAF skyrmion in a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Eigenmodes of a single SAF skyrmion in a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Eigenmodes of two SAF skyrmions in a (64 × 40 × 2) nm3 geometry. The two layers are marked with letters t (top) and b (bottom). The first eight modes are discussed in detail in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Eigenmodes of five SAF skyrmions in a (160 × 40 × 2) nm3 geometry. The two layers are marked with letters t (top) and b (bottom). The first 20 modes are discussed in detail in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Signal propagation in a FM strip hosting 25 skyrmions, similar to Fig. 8 in the main text. (a) PSD for 25 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Signal propagation in a FM strip hosting 25 skyrmions, similar to Fig. 8 in the main text. (a) and (b) as in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Absorbed magnetic power of the elliptical Permalloy nanodisc computed with the eigenmode method [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Volume-averaged magnetization power spectrum of the antiferromagnetically coupled bilayer hosting a Néel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the excitation modes of confined synthetic-antiferromagnetic (SAF) skyrmions using micromagnetic eigenvalue and ringdown simulations. Starting from a single skyrmion in a ferromagnetic layer, where the lowest-frequency modes are a gyrotropic and a breathing mode, we study how antiferromagnetic interlayer coupling modifies the dynamics in SAF bilayers. We consider several geometries: single SAF skyrmions in square and rectangular confinement, unequal layer thicknesses, and strips containing multiple skyrmions. The antiferromagnetic coupling strongly modifies the low-frequency dynamics. The square geometry exhibits two nearly degenerate gyrotropic modes, where in each both layers have the same rotation sense. In rectangular geometries, we instead find nearly linear SAF skyrmion translation emerging from opposite gyration sense in the two layers. These translational modes become the characteristic low-frequency excitations of SAF skyrmion chains. For skyrmion chains, we identify collective translational and breathing modes with standing-wave-like spatial profiles. Beyond ferromagnetic-like breathing modes, the SAF geometry supports breathing oscillations in which the two layers oscillate out of phase. We further demonstrate signal propagation along extended SAF skyrmion chains with propagation velocities comparable to ferromagnetic skyrmion chains. These results provide a systematic description of the collective dynamics of SAF skyrmions arising from the interplay of geometric confinement, intralayer, and interlayer coupling.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper uses micromagnetic eigenvalue and ringdown simulations to study the excitation modes of confined synthetic-antiferromagnetic (SAF) skyrmions. Starting from ferromagnetic single-layer modes (gyrotropic and breathing), it examines how antiferromagnetic interlayer coupling alters the spectrum in square and rectangular confinements, unequal-thickness bilayers, and multi-skyrmion strips. Key findings include two nearly degenerate same-sense gyrotropic modes in squares, opposite-sense translational modes in rectangles that become characteristic of SAF chains, collective standing-wave translational and breathing modes (including out-of-phase breathing), and comparable propagation velocities along chains.

Significance. If the numerical results hold, the work supplies a systematic classification of how geometric confinement and interlayer coupling reshape low-frequency SAF skyrmion dynamics, including identification of translational modes and out-of-phase breathing. This is relevant for spintronic device design involving SAF textures. The dual use of eigenvalue solvers and ringdown analysis is a methodological strength that aids unambiguous mode assignment.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Methods (simulation protocol): No mesh-size convergence tests, time-step validation, or comparison against analytic limits (e.g., Thiele-equation frequencies for isolated skyrmions) are reported. This leaves the quantitative accuracy of the quoted eigenfrequencies and the claimed near-degeneracies open to question, directly affecting the central mode-identification claims.
  2. [Results (rectangular confinement)] Results on rectangular geometries: The emergence of linear translational modes from opposite-sense gyration is presented as a direct consequence of the interlayer term, yet no parameter sweep over interlayer exchange strength is shown to confirm the crossover from gyrotropic to translational character. Without this, the robustness of the geometry-dependent mode classification remains untested.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures 2-4] Figure captions and text should explicitly state the sign convention for rotation sense (clockwise/counterclockwise) when describing same-sense versus opposite-sense modes to avoid ambiguity in the square-geometry discussion.
  2. [Abstract and chain-propagation subsection] The abstract states that propagation velocities are 'comparable' to ferromagnetic chains; the main text should quantify the ratio and the relevant length/time scales used for the comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to improve the validation and robustness of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] Methods (simulation protocol): No mesh-size convergence tests, time-step validation, or comparison against analytic limits (e.g., Thiele-equation frequencies for isolated skyrmions) are reported. This leaves the quantitative accuracy of the quoted eigenfrequencies and the claimed near-degeneracies open to question, directly affecting the central mode-identification claims.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation of the numerical parameters is important for the quantitative reliability of the eigenfrequencies and mode assignments. In the revised manuscript we will add (i) mesh-size convergence tests for the reported geometries, (ii) time-step validation, and (iii) a direct comparison of the lowest eigenfrequencies obtained for an isolated skyrmion against the analytic Thiele-equation predictions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results (rectangular confinement)] Results on rectangular geometries: The emergence of linear translational modes from opposite-sense gyration is presented as a direct consequence of the interlayer term, yet no parameter sweep over interlayer exchange strength is shown to confirm the crossover from gyrotropic to translational character. Without this, the robustness of the geometry-dependent mode classification remains untested.

    Authors: We accept that a parameter sweep would strengthen the claim that the translational character is a direct and robust consequence of the antiferromagnetic interlayer coupling. We will include an additional figure (or supplementary material) that varies the interlayer exchange strength and tracks the evolution of the mode character from gyrotropic to linear translational in rectangular confinement. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results are direct numerical outputs

full rationale

The paper reports eigenmodes obtained via direct numerical solution of the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation (with added interlayer exchange term) using eigenvalue and ringdown micromagnetic simulations. No analytic derivation chain exists that reduces reported frequencies or mode characters to quantities defined by the same fit or self-citation. Mode classifications (same-sense gyrotropic pairs, opposite-sense translation) emerge as simulation outputs from the interplay of intralayer and interlayer couplings under geometric confinement; they are not forced by construction or renamed known results. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked. The derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the standard micromagnetic approximation and the effective description of interlayer coupling; no new particles or forces are introduced. Free parameters are the usual material constants and the interlayer exchange strength, all of which must be chosen to match a target material.

free parameters (2)
  • interlayer antiferromagnetic exchange strength
    Determines the strength of the coupling that splits and modifies the modes; its value is set by the modeler to represent a chosen SAF stack.
  • intralayer exchange, DMI, and anisotropy constants
    Standard micromagnetic parameters that control skyrmion stability and dynamics within each layer.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Magnetization dynamics obey the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation with Gilbert damping.
    Foundational equation of all micromagnetic simulations.
  • domain assumption Synthetic antiferromagnetic coupling can be represented by a uniform effective interlayer exchange field.
    Core modeling choice that allows the bilayer to be treated as two coupled continuum layers.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5794 in / 1539 out tokens · 34432 ms · 2026-06-28T00:01:05.177694+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    vertical

    Breathing modes Modes C and D in Fig. 3b are breathing modes, in which the skyrmion radius grows and shrinks periodically [29, 42]. The visualisations show that in mode C atfC = 20.37GHz the top and bottom layer breath in phase, whereas in mode D atf D = 34.12GHz the top and bottom layer breath out of phase. The energetic impact of out-of-phase behaviour ...

  2. [2]

    the excitation of the system with a small-amplitude applied magnetic field, and 2

    Ringdown method Starting from the equilibrium state, the ringdown method has two consecutive phase: 1. the excitation of the system with a small-amplitude applied magnetic field, and 2. the recording of the ‘ringing-down’ of the system, which is used for the time-domain Fourier analysis. In both phases, the damping is set to a much smaller value ofα= 10−3...

  3. [3]

    Eigenvalue method For the eigenvalue method we need to compute eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the linearised LLG equation for small perturbations of the equilibrium configurationm0 [51]. For this we use the eigenvalue solver built intomagnum.np, which internally uses the ARPACK implementation of the implicitly restarted Arnoldi method [52] via the SciPy ...

  4. [4]

    Skyrme, A unified field theory of mesons and baryons, Nuclear Physics31, 556 (1962)

    T. Skyrme, A unified field theory of mesons and baryons, Nuclear Physics31, 556 (1962)

    1962

  5. [5]

    U. K. Rößler, A. N. Bogdanov, and C. Pfleiderer, Spontaneous skyrmion ground states in magnetic metals, Nature442, 797 (2006)

    2006

  6. [6]

    Nagaosa, Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions, Nature Nanotechnology8(2013)

    N. Nagaosa, Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions, Nature Nanotechnology8(2013)

    2013

  7. [7]

    Finocchio, F

    G. Finocchio, F. Büttner, R. Tomasello, M. Carpentieri, and M. Kläui, Magnetic skyrmions: From fundamental to appli- cations, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics49, 423001 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    Kong and H

    L. Kong and H. Ding, Majorana gets an iron twist, National Science Review6, 196 (2019)

    2019

  9. [9]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, K. Mee Song, T.-E. Park, J. Xia, M. Ezawa, X. Liu, W. Zhao, G. Zhao, and S. Woo, Skyrmion- electronics: Writing, deleting, reading and processing magnetic skyrmions toward spintronic applications, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter32, 143001 (2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    Zhang, Y

    H. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Z. Hou, M. Qin, X. Gao, and J. Liu, Magnetic skyrmions: Materials, manipulation, detection, and applications in spintronic devices, Materials Futures2, 032201 (2023)

    2023

  11. [11]

    K. M. Song, J.-S. Jeong, B. Pan, X. Zhang, J. Xia, S. Cha, T.-E. Park, K. Kim, S. Finizio, J. Raabe, J. Chang, Y. Zhou, W. Zhao, W. Kang, H. Ju, and S. Woo, Skyrmion-based artificial synapses for neuromorphic computing, Nature Electronics 3, 148 (2020)

    2020

  12. [12]

    H. Y. Yuan, X. Zhang, and C. J. O. Reichhardt, Editorial: Generation, detection and manipulation of skyrmions in magnetic nanostructures, Frontiers in Physics10, 964975 (2022)

    2022

  13. [13]

    S. A. Wolf, D. D. Awschalom, R. A. Buhrman, J. M. Daughton, S. Von Molnár, M. L. Roukes, A. Y. Chtchelkanova, and D. M. Treger, Spintronics: A Spin-Based Electronics Vision for the Future, Science294, 1488 (2001)

    2001

  14. [14]

    Juarez-Martinez, A

    G. Juarez-Martinez, A. Chiolerio, P. Allia, M. Poggio, C. L. Degen, L. Zhang, B. J. Nelson, L. Dong, M. Iwamoto, M. J. Buehler, G. Bratzel, F. A. Mohamed, N. Doble, A. Govil, I. Bita, E. Gusev, J.-T. Huang, K.-Y. Lee, H.-J. Hsu, P.-S. Chao, C.-Y. Lin, J. Muthuswamy, M. Okandan, D. P. Butler, Z. Celik-Butler, B. Kim, W.-T. Park, A. Baig, D. Gamzina, J. Zha...

    2012

  15. [15]

    Everschor-Sitte, J

    K. Everschor-Sitte, J. Masell, R. M. Reeve, and M. Kläui, Perspective: Magnetic skyrmions—Overview of recent progress in an active research field, Journal of Applied Physics124, 240901 (2018)

    2018

  16. [16]

    W. Liu, M. T. Bryan, and Y. Xu, Introduction to spintronics and 2D materials, inSpintronic 2D Materials(Elsevier, 2020) pp. 1–24

    2020

  17. [17]

    Hirohata, K

    A. Hirohata, K. Yamada, Y. Nakatani, I.-L. Prejbeanu, B. Diény, P. Pirro, and B. Hillebrands, Review on spintronics: Principles and device applications, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials509, 166711 (2020)

    2020

  18. [18]

    B. Chen, M. Zeng, K. H. Khoo, D. Das, X. Fong, S. Fukami, S. Li, W. Zhao, S. S. Parkin, S. Piramanayagam, and S. T. Lim, Spintronic devices for high-density memory and neuromorphic computing – A review, Materials Today70, 193 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    K. K. Mishra, A. H. Lone, S. Srinivasan, H. Fariborzi, and G. Setti, Magnetic Skyrmion: From Fundamental Physics to Pioneering Applications (2023), arXiv:2308.11811 [cond-mat]

    arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    A. Sud, A. Kumar, and M. Cubukcu, Novel Magnetic Materials for Spintronic Device Technology (2025), arXiv:2501.19087 [cond-mat]

    arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    A. Fert, V. Cros, and J. Sampaio, Skyrmions on the track, Nature Nanotechnology8, 152 (2013)

    2013

  22. [22]

    Parkin and S.-H

    S. Parkin and S.-H. Yang, Memory on the racetrack, Nature Nanotechnology10, 195 (2015)

    2015

  23. [23]

    Lemesh, M.-A

    S.Woo, K.Litzius, B.Krüger, M.-Y.Im, L.Caretta, K.Richter, M.Mann, A.Krone, R.M.Reeve, M.Weigand, P.Agrawal, I. Lemesh, M.-A. Mawass, P. Fischer, M. Kläui, and G. S. D. Beach, Observation of room-temperature magnetic skyrmions and their current-driven dynamics in ultrathin metallic ferromagnets, Nature Materials15, 501 (2016)

    2016

  24. [24]

    A. V. Chumak, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnonic crystals for data processing, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics50, 244001 (2017)

    2017

  25. [25]

    Chen and F

    Z. Chen and F. Ma, Skyrmion based magnonic crystals, Journal of Applied Physics130, 090901 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    S. Luo, M. Song, X. Li, Y. Zhang, J. Hong, X. Yang, X. Zou, N. Xu, and L. You, Reconfigurable skyrmion logic gates, Nano Letters18, 1180 (2018), pMID: 29350935, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04722

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04722 2018

  27. [27]

    Z. Yan, Y. Liu, Y. Guang, K. Yue, J. Feng, R. Lake, G. Yu, and X. Han, Skyrmion-based programmable logic device with 17 complete boolean logic functions, Phys. Rev. Appl.15, 064004 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    Büttner, C

    F. Büttner, C. Moutafis, M. Schneider, B. Krüger, C. M. Günther, J. Geilhufe, C. v. K. Schmising, J. Mohanty, B. Pfau, S. Schaffert, A. Bisig, M. Foerster, T. Schulz, C. a. F. Vaz, J. H. Franken, H. J. M. Swagten, M. Kläui, and S. Eisebitt, Dynamics and inertia of skyrmionic spin structures, Nature Physics11, 225 (2015)

    2015

  29. [29]

    K. Y. Guslienko and Z. V. Gareeva, Gyrotropic Skyrmion Modes in Ultrathin Magnetic Circular Dots, IEEE Magnetics Letters8, 1 (2017)

    2017

  30. [30]

    S. Woo, K. M. Song, H.-S. Han, M.-S. Jung, M.-Y. Im, K.-S. Lee, K. S. Song, P. Fischer, J.-I. Hong, J. W. Choi, B.-C. Min, H. C. Koo, and J. Chang, Spin-orbit torque-driven skyrmion dynamics revealed by time-resolved X-ray microscopy, Nature Communications8, 15573 (2017)

    2017

  31. [31]

    D. A. Garanin, R. Jaafar, and E. M. Chudnovsky, Breathing mode of a skyrmion on a lattice, Physical Review B101, 014418 (2020)

    2020

  32. [32]

    J. Kim, J. Yang, Y.-J. Cho, B. Kim, and S.-K. Kim, Coupled gyration modes in one-dimensional skyrmion arrays in thin-film nanostrips as new type of information carrier, Scientific Reports7, 45185 (2017)

    2017

  33. [33]

    J. Kim, J. Yang, Y.-J. Cho, B. Kim, and S.-K. Kim, Coupled breathing modes in one-dimensional Skyrmion lattices, Journal of Applied Physics123, 053903 (2018)

    2018

  34. [34]

    Garst, J

    M. Garst, J. Waizner, and D. Grundler, Collective spin excitations of helices and magnetic skyrmions: review and per- spectives of magnonics in non-centrosymmetric magnets, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics50, 293002 (2017)

    2017

  35. [35]

    F.Büttner, I.Lemesh,andG.S.D.Beach,Theoryofisolatedmagneticskyrmions: Fromfundamentalstoroomtemperature applications, Scientific Reports8, 4464 (2018)

    2018

  36. [36]

    Bernand-Mantel, L

    A. Bernand-Mantel, L. Camosi, A. Wartelle, N. Rougemaille, M. Darques, and L. Ranno, The skyrmion-bubble transition in a ferromagnetic thin film, SciPost Physics4, 027 (2018)

    2018

  37. [37]

    Moreau-Luchaire, C

    C. Moreau-Luchaire, C. Moutafis, N. Reyren, J. Sampaio, C. a. F. Vaz, N. Van Horne, K. Bouzehouane, K. Garcia, C. Deranlot, P. Warnicke, P. Wohlhüter, J.-M. George, M. Weigand, J. Raabe, V. Cros, and A. Fert, Additive interfacial chiralinteractioninmultilayersforstabilizationofsmallindividualskyrmionsatroomtemperature,NatureNanotechnology 11, 444 (2016)

    2016

  38. [38]

    Boulle, J

    O. Boulle, J. Vogel, H. Yang, S. Pizzini, D. de Souza Chaves, A. Locatelli, T. O. Menteş, A. Sala, L. D. Buda-Prejbeanu, O. Klein, M. Belmeguenai, Y. Roussigné, A. Stashkevich, S. M. Chérif, L. Aballe, M. Foerster, M. Chshiev, S. Auffret, I. M. Miron, and G. Gaudin, Room-temperature chiral magnetic skyrmions in ultrathin magnetic nanostructures, Nature Na...

    2016

  39. [39]

    M. Beg, M. Albert, M.-A. Bisotti, D. Cortés-Ortuño, W. Wang, R. Carey, M. Vousden, O. Hovorka, C. Ciccarelli, C. S. Spencer, C. H. Marrows, and H. Fangohr, Dynamics of skyrmionic states in confined helimagnetic nanostructures, Physical Review B95, 014433 (2017)

    2017

  40. [40]

    Y. Zhao, S. Yang, K. Wu, S. Li, Y. Gao, H. Hao, X. Zhang, S. Wang, Q. Liu, S. Zhang, Z. Chu, J. Åkerman, and Y. Zhou, Identifying and Exploring Synthetic Antiferromagnetic Skyrmions, Advanced Functional Materials33, 2303133 (2023)

    2023

  41. [41]

    R. A. Duine, K.-J. Lee, S. S. P. Parkin, and M. D. Stiles, Synthetic antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nature Physics14, 217 (2018)

    2018

  42. [42]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, and M. Ezawa, Magnetic bilayer-skyrmions without skyrmion Hall effect, Nature Communications7, 10293 (2016)

    2016

  43. [43]

    Legrand, D

    W. Legrand, D. Maccariello, F. Ajejas, S. Collin, A. Vecchiola, K. Bouzehouane, N. Reyren, V. Cros, and A. Fert, Room- temperature stabilization of antiferromagnetic skyrmions in synthetic antiferromagnets, Nature Materials19, 34 (2020)

    2020

  44. [44]

    L. Xing, D. Hua, and W. Wang, Magnetic excitations of skyrmions in antiferromagnetic-exchange coupled disks, Journal of Applied Physics124, 123904 (2018)

    2018

  45. [45]

    Lonsky and A

    M. Lonsky and A. Hoffmann, Coupled skyrmion breathing modes in synthetic ferri- and antiferromagnets, Physical Review B102, 104403 (2020)

    2020

  46. [46]

    C. E. A. Barker, E. Haltz, Thomas. A. Moore, and C. H. Marrows, Breathing modes of skyrmion strings in a synthetic antiferromagnet multilayer, Journal of Applied Physics133, 113901 (2023)

    2023

  47. [47]

    J.-V. Kim, F. Garcia-Sanchez, J. Sampaio, C. Moreau-Luchaire, V. Cros, and A. Fert, Breathing modes of confined skyrmions in ultrathin magnetic dots, Physical Review B90, 064410 (2014)

    2014

  48. [48]

    Mruczkiewicz, P

    M. Mruczkiewicz, P. Gruszecki, M. Zelent, and M. Krawczyk, Collective dynamical skyrmion excitations in a magnonic crystal, Phys. Rev. B93, 174429 (2016)

    2016

  49. [49]

    K. Y. Guslienko, Gauge and emergent electromagnetic fields for moving magnetic topological solitons, EPL (Europhysics Letters)113, 67002 (2016)

    2016

  50. [50]

    Bruckner, S

    F. Bruckner, S. Koraltan, C. Abert, and D. Suess, Magnum.np: A PyTorch based GPU enhanced finite difference micro- magnetic simulation framework for high level development and inverse design, Scientific Reports13, 12054 (2023)

    2023

  51. [51]

    M. A. Ruderman and C. Kittel, Indirect Exchange Coupling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments by Conduction Electrons, Physical Review96, 99 (1954)

    1954

  52. [52]

    Paszke, S

    A. Paszke, S. Gross, F. Massa, A. Lerer, J. Bradbury, G. Chanan, T. Killeen, Z. Lin, N. Gimelshein, L. Antiga, A. Des- maison, A. Köpf, E. Yang, Z. DeVito, M. Raison, A. Tejani, S. Chilamkurthy, B. Steiner, L. Fang, J. Bai, and S. Chintala, Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library, inProceedings of the 33rd International Confer...

    2019

  53. [54]

    d’Aquino, C

    M. d’Aquino, C. Serpico, G. Miano, and C. Forestiere, A novel formulation for the numerical computation of magnetization modes in complex micromagnetic systems, Journal of Computational Physics228, 6130 (2009)

    2009

  54. [55]

    K. J. Maschho and D. C. Sorensen, inLecture Notes in Computer Science(Springer, New York, 2005) pp. 478–486. 18

    2005

  55. [56]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, S. J. van der Walt, M. Brett, J. Wilson, K. J. Millman, N. Mayorov, A. R. J. Nelson, E. Jones, R. Kern, E. Larson, C. J. Carey, I. Polat, Y. Feng, E. W. Moore, J. VanderPlas, D. Laxalde, J. Perktold, R. Cimrman, I. Henriksen, ...

    2020

  56. [58]

    hsv” colormap does not fulfil this requirement and introduces artifacts. We instead use the “husl

    C. Schütte, J. Iwasaki, A. Rosch, and N. Nagaosa, Inertia, diffusion, and dynamics of a driven skyrmion, Physical Review B90, 174434 (2014). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Guido Meier for fruitful discussion. This work is supported by the European Union’s Horizon research and innovation program under MaMMoS No. 101135546, Marie Skłodowska Curie grant agreement...

    work page doi:10.55776/pat3864023 2014

  57. [59]

    Without Dampingα= 0 Settingα= 0in Eqn. (2) leads to the following Hermitian generalized eigenvalue problem A0⊥ [˜φk] =ω k B0 [˜φk],(3) where ˜φk andω k represent the undamped eigenmodes and eigenfrequencies, respectively. Both operatorsA0⊥ and B0 are Hermitian, which allows using the Lanczos algorithm for the solution of the eigenvalue problem, resulting ...

  58. [60]

    Perturbation analysis for dampingα >0 Starting from Eqn. (2) allowing for small dampingα >0and assuming perturbed quantities ˜φ′ k = ˜φk +δ ˜φk, ω′ k =ω k +i δω k, andB ′ 0 =B 0 +i δBresults in the following perturbated eigenvalue problem A0⊥ [˜φk +δ ˜φk] = (ωk +i δω k) (B0 +i δB) [ ˜φk +δ ˜φk],(7) with the perturbed operatorδB=−α1. Direct solution of the...

  59. [61]

    Harmonic Excitation Adding ˜h a as a source term to the unperturbed Eqn. (3) yields ωB 0 δ ˜m=A 0⊥ δ ˜m−γP 0 ˜h a (11) In order to utilise the orthogonality relation (6), the excited solutionδ˜mis expressed by the unperturbed eigen- vectors δ ˜m(x, ω) = X k ˜ak(ω) ˜φk(x)(12) 13 Scalar multiplying both sides of equation (11) with˜φh and utilizing the ortho...

  60. [62]

    (22) of Ref

    Power Spectrum of Magnetization Thevolume-averagedpowerspectrumofthemagnetizationdrivenbyaharmonicexcitation ˜h a isdefinedas(compare Eqn. (22) of Ref. [13]) ˜p(ω) = 1 2V Z M2 s |δ ˜m(x, ω)|2 dx(15) = 1 2 ∥Msδ ˜m(x, ω)∥2,(16) withδ ˜mbeing the harmonic magnetization response driven by˜h a . Inserting the modal expansion (14) yields ˜p(ω) =γ2 2 X k,h ωkωh ...

  61. [63]

    (25) of Ref

    Absorbed Magnetic Power The average power absorbed by the magnetic systemPabs(ω)driven by a harmonic excitation˜h a can be defined as the real part of the complex absorbed powerˆPabs(ω)(compare Eq. (25) of Ref. [13]) ˆPabs(ω) = µ0 2V Z iω Ms(x)δ ˜m(x, ω)· ˜h a∗ (x) dx(20) = µ0 2 iω⟨ ˜h a , M s δ ˜m⟩.(21) Inserting the modal expansion (14) and defining the...

  62. [64]

    The elliptical shape is defined by masking cells outside the ellipse boundary

    Elliptical nanodisc (run_carlotti.py) The eigenmode method is first applied to an elliptical Permalloy nanodisc with dimensions200 nm×100 nm×5 nm, discretized on a200×100×1finite-difference grid with a cell size of1 nm×1 nm×5 nm. The elliptical shape is defined by masking cells outside the ellipse boundary. The material parameters areMs = 800 kA/m,A= 13 p...

  63. [65]

    Each layer occupies one cell along thez-direction

    Antiferromagnetically coupled bilayer (run_bilayer.py) The second example considers an antiferromagnetically coupled bilayer with dimensions120 nm×120 nm×10 nm, discretized on a24×24×2grid (cell size5 nm×5 nm×5 nm). Each layer occupies one cell along thez-direction. The material parameters areMs = 800 kA/m,A= 13 pJ/m, interfacial DMID i =−3 mJ/m 2, uniaxi...

  64. [66]

    Scholz, T

    W. Scholz, T. Schrefl, and J. Fidler, Micromagnetic simulation of thermally activated switching in fine particles, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials233, 296 (2001)

    2001

  65. [67]

    Bruckner, M

    F. Bruckner, M. d’Aquino, C. Serpico, C. Abert, C. Vogler, and D. Suess, Large scale finite-element simulation of micro- magnetic thermal noise, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials468, 65 (2019)

    2019

  66. [68]

    Baker, M

    A. Baker, M. Beg, G. Ashton, M. Albert, D. Chernyshenko, W. Wang, S. Zhang, M.-A. Bisotti, M. Franchin, C. L. Hu, et al., Proposal of a micromagnetic standard problem for ferromagnetic resonance simulations, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials421, 428 (2017)

    2017

  67. [69]

    G.Carlotti, G.Gubbiotti, M.Madami, S.Tacchi,andR.Stamps,Exchange-dominatedeigenmodesinsub-100nmpermalloy dots: A micromagnetic study at finite temperature, Journal of Applied Physics115, 17D119 (2014)

    2014

  68. [70]

    H. N. Bertram, V. L. Safonov, and Z. Jin, Thermal magnetization noise, damping fundamentals, and mode analysis: application to a thin film GMR sensor, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics38, 2514 (2002)

    2002

  69. [71]

    Z. Jin, H. Bertram, and V. Safonov, Quasi-analytical calculation of thermal magnetization fluctuation noise in giant magnetoresistive sensors, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics40, 1712 (2004)

    2004

  70. [72]

    Grimsditch, L

    M. Grimsditch, L. Giovannini, F. Montoncello, F. Nizzoli, G. K. Leaf, and H. G. Kaper, Magnetic normal modes in ferromagnetic nanoparticles: A dynamical matrix approach, Physical Review B70, 054409 (2004)

    2004

  71. [73]

    R. D. McMichael and M. D. Stiles, Magnetic normal modes of nanoelements, Journal of Applied Physics97, 10J901 (2005)

    2005

  72. [74]

    d’Aquino, C

    M. d’Aquino, C. Serpico, G. Miano, and G. Bertotti, Computation of Resonant Modes and Frequencies for Saturated Ferromagnetic Nanoparticles, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics44, 3141 (2008)

    2008

  73. [75]

    d’Aquino, C

    M. d’Aquino, C. Serpico, G. Miano, and C. Forestiere, A novel formulation for the numerical computation of magnetization modes in complex micromagnetic systems, Journal of Computational Physics228, 6130 (2009). 16

    2009

  74. [76]

    Forestiere, M

    C. Forestiere, M. d’Aquino, G. Miano, and C. Serpico, Finite element computations of resonant modes for small magnetic particles, Journal of Applied Physics105, 07D312 (2009)

    2009

  75. [77]

    R. B. Lehoucq, D. C. Sorensen, and C. Yang,ARPACK users’ guide: solution of large-scale eigenvalue problems with implicitly restarted Arnoldi methods, Vol. 6 (SIAM, 1998)

    1998

  76. [78]

    d’Aquino and R

    M. d’Aquino and R. Hertel, Micromagnetic frequency-domain simulation methods for magnonic systems, Journal of Applied Physics133, 033902 (2023)

    2023

  77. [79]

    Perna, F

    S. Perna, F. Bruckner, C. Serpico, D. Suess, and M. d’Aquino, Computational micromagnetics based on normal modes: Bridging the gap between macrospin and full spatial discretization, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials546, 168683 (2022)

    2022

  78. [80]

    Bruckner, S

    F. Bruckner, S. Koraltan, C. Abert, and D. Suess, magnum.np: a PyTorch based GPU enhanced finite difference micro- magnetic simulation framework for high level development and inverse design, Scientific Reports13, 12054 (2023)

    2023