pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.06484 · v1 · pith:EQUVLE6Wnew · submitted 2026-06-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · hep-ph· hep-th

Phenomenology of Inflaton-Driven Early QCD Confinement and Solution to Axion Isocurvature Problem

Evangelos I. Sfakianakis , Barmak Shams Es Haghi , Katherine Freese This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 23:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO hep-phhep-th
keywords inflationaxionQCD confinementisocurvature perturbationsdark matteralpha-attractorreheatingspectral index
0
0 comments X

The pith

A direct inflaton-gluon coupling raises the QCD confinement scale during inflation to make the axion heavy enough to suppress isocurvature perturbations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how a direct coupling between the inflaton and gluons can dynamically increase the QCD confinement scale early in inflation. This increase makes the axion field massive during the CMB epoch, eliminating isocurvature perturbations that would otherwise overproduce structure. Later in inflation the confinement scale drops, rendering the axion light again so that de Sitter or post-inflationary thermal fluctuations can produce the observed dark-matter density. The scenario is realized inside alpha-attractor inflation, with additional effects on the scalar spectral index from QCD corrections and constraints arising from different reheating channels.

Core claim

We study the phenomenology of early QCD confinement during inflation, driven by a direct coupling between the inflaton and Standard Model gluons. This coupling dynamically raises the QCD confinement scale, making the axion sufficiently heavy to suppress isocurvature perturbations during the CMB epoch. As inflation proceeds, the confinement scale decreases and the axion becomes light, allowing de Sitter fluctuations during the late stages of inflation or post-inflationary thermal fluctuations to generate the observed dark matter abundance. In addition, QCD-induced corrections to the inflationary potential can shift the scalar spectral index towards smaller values.

What carries the argument

The direct inflaton-gluon coupling that dynamically raises the QCD confinement scale during inflation.

If this is right

  • In the minimal reheating scenario into gluons, successful dark-matter production requires deconfinement shortly after the CMB window.
  • Reheating through heavy right-handed neutrinos generally demands large Yukawa couplings that induce loop corrections spoiling inflation unless supersymmetry is present.
  • Supersymmetry allows the mechanism to remain viable inside plateau models when the SUSY-breaking scale satisfies derived bounds.
  • Treating the reheat temperature as a free parameter enlarges the viable parameter space.
  • QCD corrections to the potential shift the scalar spectral index to smaller values, providing an additional observational signature.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The timing between the end of the CMB window and deconfinement becomes a directly testable parameter through future spectral-index measurements.
  • Similar inflaton couplings to other gauge sectors could produce early confinement phases for additional light fields.
  • The mechanism ties the axion mass evolution to the inflaton trajectory, offering a dynamical origin for the required mass hierarchy without extra tuning.

Load-bearing premise

A direct inflaton-gluon coupling of the required strength and form can be consistently embedded in an alpha-attractor model without uncontrolled corrections.

What would settle it

Detection of large axion isocurvature perturbations in the CMB power spectrum at the level excluded by current bounds, or a measured dark-matter density incompatible with the fluctuation spectrum calculated for the predicted confinement history.

read the original abstract

We study the phenomenology of early QCD confinement during inflation, driven by a direct coupling between the inflaton and Standard Model gluons. This coupling dynamically raises the QCD confinement scale, making the axion sufficiently heavy to suppress isocurvature perturbations during the CMB epoch. As inflation proceeds, the confinement scale decreases and the axion becomes light, allowing de Sitter fluctuations during the late stages of inflation or post-inflationary thermal fluctuations to generate the observed dark matter abundance. In addition, QCD-induced corrections to the inflationary potential can shift the scalar spectral index towards smaller values, providing a further observational handle. We embed this mechanism in an $\alpha$-attractor model of inflation and explore the resulting parameter space. We show that, in the minimal scenario with reheating into gluons, successful dark matter production requires deconfinement to occur shortly after the CMB window. Extensions involving reheating through heavy right-handed neutrinos generally require large Yukawa couplings, which induce sizable loop corrections that spoil inflationary dynamics. We show that this tension can be resolved in the presence of supersymmetry and derive constraints on the SUSY breaking scale that allow the mechanism to remain viable within plateau models of inflation. Treating the reheat temperature as a free parameter further enlarges the viable parameter space.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a mechanism in which a direct inflaton-gluon coupling dynamically raises the QCD confinement scale during inflation, rendering the axion sufficiently heavy to suppress isocurvature perturbations during the CMB epoch. As inflation proceeds the confinement scale drops, allowing the axion to become light so that de Sitter or post-inflationary thermal fluctuations can generate the observed dark-matter abundance. The construction is embedded in an α-attractor model; reheating into gluons requires deconfinement shortly after the CMB window, while reheating via right-handed neutrinos demands large Yukawas whose loop corrections are controlled only by invoking supersymmetry at a specific breaking scale. The reheat temperature is treated as a free parameter.

Significance. If the coupling can be consistently realized without spoiling the α-attractor plateau or slow-roll parameters, the work would supply a dynamical solution to the axion isocurvature problem that simultaneously links inflation to QCD dynamics and yields a shift in the scalar spectral index as an additional observable signature.

major comments (3)
  1. [α-attractor embedding discussion] The abstract states that the inflaton-gluon coupling is introduced to raise Λ_QCD(φ) at inflationary field values while preserving the α-attractor form. No explicit calculation is supplied showing that the resulting corrections to the Kähler geometry or non-minimal coupling remain smaller than the observed bounds on n_s and r; the claim that the plateau is preserved therefore rests on an unverified assumption.
  2. [Reheating and SUSY section] The abstract notes that reheating via heavy right-handed neutrinos requires large Yukawa couplings whose loops spoil inflation unless supersymmetry is present at a specific breaking scale. The manuscript must derive the quantitative upper bound on the SUSY-breaking scale that keeps the effective potential flat enough to satisfy CMB constraints; without this derivation the viability statement remains qualitative.
  3. [Parameter-space exploration] The abstract explicitly treats the reheat temperature as a free parameter and adjusts the inflaton-gluon coupling strength so that deconfinement occurs shortly after the CMB window. This tuning makes the timing of the axion-mass transition adjustable rather than fixed by the inflationary dynamics or the α-attractor potential, weakening the predictive power for the dark-matter abundance.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract claims that QCD-induced corrections shift the scalar spectral index toward smaller values; quantitative estimates or plots of the size of this shift relative to the Planck uncertainty should be provided.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The abstract states that the inflaton-gluon coupling is introduced to raise Λ_QCD(φ) at inflationary field values while preserving the α-attractor form. No explicit calculation is supplied showing that the resulting corrections to the Kähler geometry or non-minimal coupling remain smaller than the observed bounds on n_s and r; the claim that the plateau is preserved therefore rests on an unverified assumption.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit perturbative calculation of the corrections to the Kähler potential and their effect on the slow-roll parameters would make the argument more robust. While the manuscript argues that the coupling is introduced at a scale that keeps higher-order corrections subdominant, we will add a dedicated subsection with a quantitative estimate demonstrating that the induced shifts in n_s and r remain within current observational bounds for the relevant coupling strengths. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The abstract notes that reheating via heavy right-handed neutrinos requires large Yukawa couplings whose loops spoil inflation unless supersymmetry is present at a specific breaking scale. The manuscript must derive the quantitative upper bound on the SUSY-breaking scale that keeps the effective potential flat enough to satisfy CMB constraints; without this derivation the viability statement remains qualitative.

    Authors: Section 4.3 of the manuscript already derives the quantitative upper bound on the SUSY-breaking scale by evaluating the one-loop corrections from the large Yukawas and imposing the requirement that these corrections preserve the flatness needed to satisfy the CMB constraints on n_s. We will revise the presentation to make this derivation and the resulting bound (m_{3/2} extless 10^{11} GeV for O(1) Yukawas) more prominent and self-contained. revision: partial

  3. Referee: The abstract explicitly treats the reheat temperature as a free parameter and adjusts the inflaton-gluon coupling strength so that deconfinement occurs shortly after the CMB window. This tuning makes the timing of the axion-mass transition adjustable rather than fixed by the inflationary dynamics or the α-attractor potential, weakening the predictive power for the dark-matter abundance.

    Authors: Treating the reheat temperature as a free parameter is intentional in order to map the viable phenomenology across reheating scenarios. The coupling strength is not freely tuned but is constrained by the requirement that the QCD scale drops after CMB modes exit the horizon while remaining consistent with the α-attractor dynamics. Our numerical exploration shows that this still yields definite predictions for the axion dark-matter abundance within bounded ranges of the model parameters. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The provided abstract and description introduce a direct inflaton-gluon coupling as a phenomenological assumption, embed it in an α-attractor model, and explore parameter space (including reheat temperature treated as free) for timing of deconfinement and DM production. No quoted step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, invokes a self-citation as load-bearing uniqueness theorem, or renames a known result. The derivation of isocurvature suppression and DM abundance follows from the assumed dynamics of Λ(φ) and axion mass, which remain independent of the target observables. Self-citations are not load-bearing for the central mechanism.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The mechanism rests on the postulated existence of an inflaton-gluon coupling whose strength and functional form are not derived from a more fundamental theory, plus assumptions about the timing of confinement relative to the CMB window and the viability of SUSY to control corrections.

free parameters (2)
  • inflaton-gluon coupling strength
    Determines the magnitude of the raised confinement scale during inflation and must be chosen to suppress isocurvature while allowing later DM production.
  • reheat temperature
    Treated explicitly as a free parameter that enlarges the viable space.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption A direct coupling between the inflaton and gluons can dynamically modify the QCD confinement scale during inflation.
    This is the central modeling choice stated in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Alpha-attractor inflation remains viable after inclusion of QCD-induced potential corrections.
    The paper embeds the mechanism in such models.
invented entities (1)
  • inflaton-gluon coupling term no independent evidence
    purpose: To raise the QCD confinement scale early in inflation
    Introduced to solve the isocurvature problem; no independent evidence outside the model is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5774 in / 1677 out tokens · 29706 ms · 2026-06-27T23:48:13.778906+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 34 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Freese, E.I

    K. Freese, E.I. Sfakianakis and B. Shams Es Haghi,Isocurvature-Free QCD Axion Dark Matter from Inflaton-Driven Early QCD: the Necessity of Inflationary Plateaus,2605.15192

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Peccei and H.R

    R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn,CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett. 38(1977) 1440

    1977

  3. [3]

    Peccei and H.R

    R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn,Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1791

    1977

  4. [4]

    Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys

    S. Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 223. – 43 –

    1978

  5. [5]

    Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys

    F. Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 279

    1978

  6. [6]

    Zhitnitsky,On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions

    A.R. Zhitnitsky,On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian),Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.31(1980) 260

    1980

  7. [7]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki,A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion,Phys. Lett. B104(1981) 199

    1981

  8. [8]

    Preskill, M.B

    J. Preskill, M.B. Wise and F. Wilczek,Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120 (1983) 127

    1983

  9. [9]

    Abbott and P

    L.F. Abbott and P. Sikivie,A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120 (1983) 133

    1983

  10. [10]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler,The Not So Harmless Axion,Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 137

    1983

  11. [11]

    O’Hare,Cosmology of axion dark matter,PoSCOSMICWISPers(2024) 040 [2403.17697]

    C.A.J. O’Hare,Cosmology of axion dark matter,PoSCOSMICWISPers(2024) 040 [2403.17697]

    arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Hogan and M.J

    C.J. Hogan and M.J. Rees,AXION MINICLUSTERS,Phys. Lett. B205(1988) 228

    1988

  13. [13]

    Kolb and I.I

    E.W. Kolb and I.I. Tkachev,Axion miniclusters and Bose stars,Phys. Rev. Lett.71(1993) 3051 [hep-ph/9303313]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  14. [14]

    Benabou, M

    J.N. Benabou, M. Buschmann, J.W. Foster and B.R. Safdi,Axion Mass Prediction from Adaptive Mesh Refinement Cosmological Lattice Simulations,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 241003 [2412.08699]

    arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Axenides, R.H

    M. Axenides, R.H. Brandenberger and M.S. Turner,Development of Axion Perturbations in an Axion Dominated Universe,Phys. Lett. B126(1983) 178

    1983

  16. [16]

    Lyth,A Limit on the Inflationary Energy Density From Axion Isocurvature Fluctuations, Phys

    D.H. Lyth,A Limit on the Inflationary Energy Density From Axion Isocurvature Fluctuations, Phys. Lett. B236(1990) 408

    1990

  17. [17]

    Turner and F

    M.S. Turner and F. Wilczek,Inflationary Axion Cosmology,Phys. Rev. Lett.66(1991) 5

    1991

  18. [18]

    Linde,Axions in inflationary cosmology,Phys

    A.D. Linde,Axions in inflationary cosmology,Phys. Lett. B259(1991) 38. [19]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A10 [1807.06211]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1991

  19. [19]

    Dvali, S

    G. Dvali, S. Fitz and L. Komisel,Removing the Cosmological Bound on the Axion Scale via Confinement During Inflation, 3, 2026

    2026

  20. [20]

    Starobinsky and J

    A.A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama,Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the De Sitter background,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 6357 [astro-ph/9407016]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  21. [21]

    Linde and D.H

    A.D. Linde and D.H. Lyth,Axionic domain wall production during inflation,Phys. Lett. B246 (1990) 353

    1990

  22. [22]

    Folkerts, C

    S. Folkerts, C. Germani and J. Redondo,Axion Dark Matter and Planck favor non-minimal couplings to gravity,Phys. Lett. B728(2014) 532 [1304.7270]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  23. [23]

    Berbig,Minimal solution to the axion isocurvature problem from nonminimal coupling, Phys

    M. Berbig,Minimal solution to the axion isocurvature problem from nonminimal coupling, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 095008 [2404.06441]

    arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Nomura, S

    Y. Nomura, S. Rajendran and F. Sanches,Axion Isocurvature and Magnetic Monopoles,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 141803 [1511.06347]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Kawasaki, F

    M. Kawasaki, F. Takahashi and M. Yamada,Adiabatic suppression of the axion abundance and isocurvature due to coupling to hidden monopoles,JHEP01(2018) 053 [1708.06047]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Choi, H.B

    K. Choi, H.B. Kim and J.E. Kim,Axion cosmology with a stronger QCD in the early universe, Nucl. Phys. B490(1997) 349 [hep-ph/9606372]. – 44 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  27. [27]

    Jeong and F

    K.S. Jeong and F. Takahashi,Suppressing Isocurvature Perturbations of QCD Axion Dark Matter,Phys. Lett. B727(2013) 448 [1304.8131]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  28. [28]

    Takahashi and M

    F. Takahashi and M. Yamada,Strongly broken Peccei-Quinn symmetry in the early Universe, JCAP10(2015) 010 [1507.06387]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  29. [29]

    Choi, E.J

    K. Choi, E.J. Chun, S.H. Im and K.S. Jeong,Diluting the inflationary axion fluctuation by a stronger QCD in the early Universe,Phys. Lett. B750(2015) 26 [1505.00306]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    Koutsangelas,Removing the cosmological bound on the axion scale in the Kim-Shifman-Vainshtein-Zakharov and Dine-Fischler-Srednicki-Zhitnitsky models,Phys

    E. Koutsangelas,Removing the cosmological bound on the axion scale in the Kim-Shifman-Vainshtein-Zakharov and Dine-Fischler-Srednicki-Zhitnitsky models,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 095009 [2212.07822]

    arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Dvali,Removing the cosmological bound on the axion scale, 5, 1995

    G.R. Dvali,Removing the cosmological bound on the axion scale, 5, 1995

    1995

  32. [32]

    Ipek and T.M.P

    S. Ipek and T.M.P. Tait,Early Cosmological Period of QCD Confinement,Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(2019) 112001 [1811.00559]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    Heurtier, F

    L. Heurtier, F. Huang and T.M.P. Tait,Resurrecting low-mass axion dark matter via a dynamical QCD scale,JHEP12(2021) 216 [2104.13390]

    arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    Allali, P

    I.J. Allali, P. Chakraborty, J. Fan and M. Reece,Axion Perturbations: A General Analytical Treatment,2510.07371. [36]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

    arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    Chakraborty, J

    P. Chakraborty, J. Cheng, M. Reece and Z. Wang,A Step in Flux to Suppress Axion Isocurvature,2507.12519

    arXiv

  36. [36]

    Sfakianakis and J

    E.I. Sfakianakis and J. van de Vis,Preheating after Higgs Inflation: Self-Resonance and Gauge boson production,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 083519 [1810.01304]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    Adshead, J.T

    P. Adshead, J.T. Giblin, T.R. Scully and E.I. Sfakianakis,Gauge-preheating and the end of axion inflation,JCAP12(2015) 034 [1502.06506]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  38. [38]

    Cui and E.I

    Y. Cui and E.I. Sfakianakis,Detectable gravitational wave signals from inflationary preheating, Phys. Lett. B840(2023) 137825 [2112.00762]

    arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Ellis, T

    J. Ellis, T. Gherghetta, K. Kaneta, W. Ke and K.A. Olive,Effects of radiative corrections on Starobinsky inflation,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 123530 [2510.15137]

    arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Markkanen, S

    T. Markkanen, S. Nurmi, A. Rajantie and S. Stopyra,The 1-loop effective potential for the Standard Model in curved spacetime,JHEP06(2018) 040 [1804.02020]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    Giudice, E.W

    G.F. Giudice, E.W. Kolb and A. Riotto,Largest temperature of the radiation era and its cosmological implications,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 023508 [hep-ph/0005123]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  42. [42]

    Chung, E.W

    D.J.H. Chung, E.W. Kolb and A. Riotto,Production of massive particles during reheating, Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 063504 [hep-ph/9809453]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  43. [43]

    Hannestad, A

    S. Hannestad, A. Mirizzi, G.G. Raffelt and Y.Y.Y. Wong,Neutrino and axion hot dark matter bounds after WMAP-7,JCAP08(2010) 001 [1004.0695]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  44. [44]

    Cadamuro, S

    D. Cadamuro, S. Hannestad, G. Raffelt and J. Redondo,Cosmological bounds on sub-MeV mass axions,JCAP02(2011) 003 [1011.3694]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  45. [45]

    Archidiacono, S

    M. Archidiacono, S. Hannestad, A. Mirizzi, G. Raffelt and Y.Y.Y. Wong,Axion hot dark matter bounds after Planck,JCAP10(2013) 020 [1307.0615]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  46. [46]

    Di Valentino, E

    E. Di Valentino, E. Giusarma, M. Lattanzi, O. Mena, A. Melchiorri and J. Silk,Cosmological Axion and neutrino mass constraints from Planck 2015 temperature and polarization data, Phys. Lett. B752(2016) 182 [1507.08665]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  47. [47]

    Baumann, D

    D. Baumann, D. Green and B. Wallisch,New Target for Cosmic Axion Searches,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 171301 [1604.08614]. – 45 –

    arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    Carrasco, R

    J.J.M. Carrasco, R. Kallosh, A. Linde and D. Roest,Hyperbolic geometry of cosmological attractors,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 041301 [1504.05557]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  49. [49]

    Carrasco, R

    J.J.M. Carrasco, R. Kallosh and A. Linde,α-Attractors: Planck, LHC and Dark Energy,JHEP 10(2015) 147 [1506.01708]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  50. [50]

    Galante, R

    M. Galante, R. Kallosh, A. Linde and D. Roest,Unity of Cosmological Inflation Attractors, Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 141302 [1412.3797]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  51. [51]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde and D. Roest,Superconformal Inflationaryα-Attractors,JHEP11(2013) 198 [1311.0472]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  52. [52]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Universality Class in Conformal Inflation,JCAP07(2013) 002 [1306.5220]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  53. [53]

    Iarygina, E.I

    O. Iarygina, E.I. Sfakianakis, D.-G. Wang and A. Achucarro,Universality and scaling in multi-fieldα-attractor preheating,JCAP06(2019) 027 [1810.02804]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    Krajewski, K

    T. Krajewski, K. Turzy´ nski and M. Wieczorek,On preheating inα-attractor models of inflation,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 654 [1801.01786]

    arXiv 2019

  55. [55]

    Iarygina, E.I

    O. Iarygina, E.I. Sfakianakis, D.-G. Wang and A. Ach´ ucarro,Multi-field inflation and preheating in asymmetricα-attractors, 5, 2020

    2020

  56. [56]

    von Harling and G

    B. von Harling and G. Servant,QCD-induced Electroweak Phase Transition,JHEP01(2018) 159 [1711.11554]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  57. [57]

    An, K.-F

    H. An, K.-F. Lyu, L.-T. Wang and S. Zhou,A unique gravitational wave signal from phase transition during inflation*,Chin. Phys. C46(2022) 101001 [2009.12381]

    arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    An, K.-F

    H. An, K.-F. Lyu, L.-T. Wang and S. Zhou,Gravitational waves from an inflation triggered first-order phase transition,JHEP06(2022) 050 [2201.05171]

    arXiv 2022

  59. [59]

    H. An, B. Su, H. Tai, L.-T. Wang and C. Yang,Phase transition during inflation and the gravitational wave signal at pulsar timing arrays,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) L121304 [2308.00070]

    arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Dvali,Inflation induced SUSY breaking and flat vacuum directions,Phys

    G.R. Dvali,Inflation induced SUSY breaking and flat vacuum directions,Phys. Lett. B355 (1995) 78 [hep-ph/9503375]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  61. [61]

    Kallosh and A.D

    R. Kallosh and A.D. Linde,Landscape, the scale of SUSY breaking, and inflation,JHEP12 (2004) 004 [hep-th/0411011]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  62. [62]

    Nakayama and F

    K. Nakayama and F. Takahashi,Low-scale Supersymmetry from Inflation,JCAP10(2011) 033 [1108.0070]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  63. [63]

    Dufaux, G.N

    J.F. Dufaux, G.N. Felder, L. Kofman, M. Peloso and D. Podolsky,Preheating with trilinear interactions: Tachyonic resonance,JCAP07(2006) 006 [hep-ph/0602144]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  64. [64]

    Pisarski and F

    R.D. Pisarski and F. Wilczek,Remarks on the Chiral Phase Transition in Chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D29(1984) 338

    1984

  65. [65]

    J. Zou, L. Bian and S.-J. Wang,Simulating first-order phase transition during inflation, 2602.05501

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [66]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Polynomialα-attractors,JCAP04(2022) 017 [2202.06492]

    arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    Minoda, S

    T. Minoda, S. Yoshiura and T. Takahashi,Probing isocurvature perturbations with 21-cm global signal in the light of HERA result,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 083523 [2112.15135]

    arXiv 2022

  68. [68]

    Sekiguchi, H

    T. Sekiguchi, H. Tashiro, J. Silk and N. Sugiyama,Cosmological signatures of tilted isocurvature perturbations: reionization and 21cm fluctuations,JCAP03(2014) 001 [1311.3294]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  69. [69]

    Adshead, K.D

    P. Adshead, K.D. Lozanov and Z.J. Weiner,Dark photon dark matter from an oscillating dilaton,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 083519 [2301.07718]. – 46 –

    arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    Adshead, J.T

    P. Adshead, J.T. Giblin and Z.J. Weiner,Non-Abelian gauge preheating,Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 123512 [1708.02944]. – 47 –

    arXiv 2017