pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.07287 · v1 · pith:AEERCDQCnew · submitted 2026-06-05 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph

Static Effective Hamiltonians for Molecular Systems through RPA-based downfolding

Erik Verzijl , Arno F\"orster This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 20:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph
keywords effective Hamiltoniandownfoldingconstrained RPAmolecular systemsbond dissociationdynamical correlationstrong correlationbenzene
0
0 comments X

The pith

cRPA downfolding produces static effective Hamiltonians that capture dynamical and strong correlations for benzene bond dissociation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops methods to build reduced-dimension static effective Hamiltonians for molecular systems by incorporating screening from the electronic environment via constrained random phase approximation (cRPA) and moment RPA (mRPA). Expressions are derived for the environment's energy contribution and the effective one- and two-body terms, with double-counting corrections applied to prevent overcounting. Tests on the ground-state energy of benzene and its bond dissociation curves show that cRPA-based downfolding handles both dynamical and strong correlations effectively. In contrast, mRPA and cRPA restricted to particle-hole screening fail to describe bond dissociation because a dynamical correlation term dominates. The two methods become nearly identical when restricted to the static limit.

Core claim

Downfolding using cRPA constructs static effective Hamiltonians that accurately describe both dynamical and strong correlation in benzene, including its bond dissociation curves, while mRPA and particle-hole-restricted cRPA fail due to an overdominant dynamical correlation term; in the static limit the methods are almost indistinguishable.

What carries the argument

cRPA and mRPA screening applied to generate effective one- and two-body interactions in a reduced active space, with double-counting corrections to remove environment contributions already accounted for.

If this is right

  • cRPA-derived static Hamiltonians can be diagonalized or used in subsequent calculations to obtain ground-state energies that match the full system's behavior for both equilibrium and dissociated geometries.
  • mRPA and restricted cRPA versions produce effective Hamiltonians whose dissociation curves deviate because the dynamical correlation term is not properly balanced.
  • When all frequency dependence is removed, cRPA and mRPA effective Hamiltonians yield essentially the same ground-state properties.
  • The approach separates the environment screening from the active-space problem while preserving the essential correlation physics needed for bond breaking.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be applied to larger molecules where full calculations become prohibitive, provided the active-space choice remains valid.
  • The near-identity of cRPA and mRPA in the static limit indicates that the frequency dependence retained in cRPA is responsible for its better performance on strong correlation.
  • Similar downfolding tests on other molecules with varying bond orders would reveal whether the dynamical-correlation dominance seen in mRPA is a general feature.

Load-bearing premise

That RPA-based screening together with the double-counting corrections produces an effective Hamiltonian whose ground-state properties faithfully reflect the original system's dynamical and strong correlations.

What would settle it

A numerical comparison of the benzene bond-dissociation energy curve obtained from the cRPA-derived effective Hamiltonian against the curve from the full many-body calculation would directly test whether the downfolded model captures the required correlations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.07287 by Arno F\"orster, Erik Verzijl.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: −|v eff(ω = 0)−v| with a) cRPA, b) mRPA, and c) cRPAph for benzene in cc-pVDZ basis with a (6,6) active space. Only two of the eight-fold symmetry of the two-body terms is shown. The sign does not change upon screening, so absolute values are used to show the magnitude of screening. To make clear screening lowers the magnitude for each matrix element, we plot this difference as negative values. 3.00 3.20 3… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Benzene in cc-pVDZ basis with (10,10) active space. a) Tr[v eff], b) Ecorr, c) Ecorr zoomed in. The dashed vertical lines are the values for Ωs. the eigenvalues ΩR are closely together, it be￾comes very erratic. Additionally, if one were to analytically continue from a grid of imaginary frequencies, the pole-like structure would natu￾rally not emerge. This supports the restriction ω < min{ΩR}. In Fig. 2a, … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows the dissociation curves for H2 in the cc-pVTZ basis, using (Fig. 3a) HF or (Fig. 3b) PBE orbitals. Before going into de￾1 2 3 4 5 bond length [Å] 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 Etot [H a] (a) HF-orbitals HF RPA FCI CASCI BARE cRPA cRPAph mRPA 1 2 3 4 5 bond length [Å] 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 Etot [H a] (b) PBE-orbitals HF RPA FCI CASCI BARE cRPA cRPAph mRPA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Energy contributions to the total energy of H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: a/b) H6 in cc-pVDZ basis with a) (4,4) active space b) (6,6) active space. Bond length is the distance between neighboring hydrogen atoms, which is equal for all six pairs. c) N2 in cc-pVDZ basis with a (6,6) active space, composed of all 2p linear combinations. The ASCI curve is obtained with Ncore = 32.000 and Ntarget = 320.000. d) Be2 in cc-pVTZ basis with a (4,4) active space, composed of 2s and 2pz bo… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Green's function-based downfolding methods construct effective Hamiltonians of reduced dimension that capture dynamical correlations of an electronic environment through effective potentials acting on the active space only. Using methods based on the constrained random phase approximation (cRPA) and moment RPA (mRPA), we construct static effective Hamiltonians that include screening through the environment. We derive expressions for the energy contribution from the environment and for the effective one- and two-body terms, taking into account double-counting corrections. cRPA requires additional consideration due to its frequency dependence, while mRPA provides a static Hamiltonian by construction. For the ground state energy of benzene and bond dissociation curves, we discuss the differences and similarities between the different flavors of RPA-based screening. We show that downfolding using cRPA describes both dynamical and strong correlation well, while mRPA and cRPA restricted to screening the particle-hole matrix elements can fail to describe bond dissociation due to a dominating dynamical correlation term. In the static limit, these two methods are shown to be almost indistinguishable.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops static effective Hamiltonians for molecular systems via Green's function downfolding based on constrained RPA (cRPA) and moment RPA (mRPA). It derives expressions for the environment energy contribution together with effective one- and two-body terms that incorporate double-counting corrections. cRPA is treated in its static limit because of frequency dependence, while mRPA is static by construction. The methods are applied to the ground-state energy of benzene and to its bond-dissociation curves; the authors conclude that cRPA captures both dynamical and strong correlation, that mRPA and particle-hole-restricted cRPA fail because of a dominating dynamical-correlation term, and that the two approaches become nearly indistinguishable in the static limit.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the work supplies a concrete route to static effective Hamiltonians that embed environmental screening for active-space calculations on molecular systems exhibiting strong correlation. The derivations of the effective interaction and environment-energy terms are presented as parameter-free, which is a methodological strength. The comparison between cRPA and mRPA also clarifies the role of dynamical correlation in bond dissociation, a point of practical interest for downfolding techniques.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and derivation of effective terms] The central claim that the cRPA-derived static Hamiltonian reproduces the full-system bond-dissociation curve of benzene rests on the accuracy of the double-counting corrections and the environment-energy term; the manuscript supplies no independent verification (e.g., comparison against full-system benchmarks or explicit quantification of residual dynamical contamination after the static-limit projection) that these corrections have removed dynamical contributions rather than compensating through active-space choice. This verification is load-bearing for the performance distinction drawn between cRPA and mRPA.
  2. [Benzene results and discussion of dynamical correlation] The statement that mRPA (and restricted cRPA) fails because of a “dominating dynamical correlation term” is not accompanied by an explicit numerical decomposition or table showing the magnitude of that term for the benzene dissociation curve; without such data the attribution remains untested and directly affects the cross-method comparison.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by inclusion of at least one quantitative benchmark (energy difference or dissociation energy) together with a reference to the relevant figure or table.
  2. [Method section] Notation for the screened interaction and double-counting subtraction should be introduced once with an explicit equation number and then used consistently; several symbols appear without prior definition in the early sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and positive assessment of the work's significance. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional clarifications and data as outlined.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and derivation of effective terms] The central claim that the cRPA-derived static Hamiltonian reproduces the full-system bond-dissociation curve of benzene rests on the accuracy of the double-counting corrections and the environment-energy term; the manuscript supplies no independent verification (e.g., comparison against full-system benchmarks or explicit quantification of residual dynamical contamination after the static-limit projection) that these corrections have removed dynamical contributions rather than compensating through active-space choice. This verification is load-bearing for the performance distinction drawn between cRPA and mRPA.

    Authors: The bond-dissociation curves provide direct comparison to full-system results, as the effective Hamiltonian energies are benchmarked against the complete molecular calculations at each geometry. The double-counting corrections are derived from the same Green's function framework to analytically subtract active-space contributions from the environment terms. We agree, however, that an explicit quantification of any residual dynamical contamination would strengthen the distinction between methods and will add a supplementary analysis comparing static projections to frequency-dependent cRPA results at selected points along the curve. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Benzene results and discussion of dynamical correlation] The statement that mRPA (and restricted cRPA) fails because of a “dominating dynamical correlation term” is not accompanied by an explicit numerical decomposition or table showing the magnitude of that term for the benzene dissociation curve; without such data the attribution remains untested and directly affects the cross-method comparison.

    Authors: We will add an explicit decomposition table in the revised manuscript that isolates the dynamical correlation contribution (estimated via the difference between the static effective Hamiltonian and the frequency-dependent reference) for multiple points on the benzene dissociation curve. This will allow direct numerical comparison of the term's magnitude across cRPA, mRPA, and restricted cRPA. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivations of effective terms and double-counting corrections are presented as explicit constructions from RPA screening, not reductions to inputs.

full rationale

The abstract and described claims center on deriving expressions for environment energy, effective one- and two-body terms, and double-counting corrections from cRPA/mRPA screening. These are forward constructions applied to benzene dissociation curves, with explicit comparisons between methods. No quoted step reduces a 'prediction' to a fitted parameter by construction, invokes a self-citation as the sole justification for a uniqueness claim, or renames an input as an output. The performance claims rest on numerical results rather than tautological equivalence, making the derivation chain self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Ledger constructed from abstract only; full paper likely contains additional domain assumptions about RPA validity and double-counting that are not visible here.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The random phase approximation (cRPA and mRPA) supplies a sufficiently accurate description of screening by the electronic environment.
    All downfolding expressions and performance claims rest on this standard approximation in the field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5712 in / 1268 out tokens · 21131 ms · 2026-06-27T20:24:12.740801+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

265 extracted references · 131 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    1953 , journal =

    Bohm, David and Pines, David , number =. 1953 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.92.609 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.92.609 1953

  2. [2]

    and Taylor, Peter R

    Roos, Björn O. and Taylor, Peter R. and Sigbahn, Per E.M. , number =. 1980 , journal =. doi:10.1016/0301-0104(80)80045-0 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/0301-0104(80)80045-0 1980

  3. [3]

    and Handy, Nicholas C

    Knowles, Peter J. and Handy, Nicholas C. , number =. 1989 , journal =. doi:10.1016/0010-4655(89)90033-7 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/0010-4655(89)90033-7 1989

  4. [4]

    and Lee, Joonho and Takeshita, Tyler Y

    Tubman, Norm M. and Lee, Joonho and Takeshita, Tyler Y. and Head-Gordon, Martin and Whaley, K. Birgitta , number =. 2016 , journal =. doi:10.1063/1.4955109 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4955109 2016

  5. [5]

    , number =

    Evangelista, Francesco A. , number =. 2014 , journal =. doi:10.1063/1.4890660 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4890660 2014

  6. [6]

    and Pople, John A

    Raghavachari, Krishnan and Trucks, Gary W. and Pople, John A. and Head-Gordon, Martin , number =. 1989 , journal =. doi:10.1016/S0009-2614(89)87395-6 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0009-2614(89)87395-6 1989

  7. [7]

    and Malmqvist, Per-Åke , number =

    Ghigo, Giovanni and Roos, Björn O. and Malmqvist, Per-Åke , number =. 2004 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2004.08.032 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2004.08.032 2004

  8. [8]

    and Tubman, Norm M

    Williams-Young, David B. and Tubman, Norm M. and Mejuto-Zaera, Carlos and de Jong, Wibe A. , number =. 2023 , journal =. doi:10.1063/5.0148650 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0148650 2023

  9. [9]

    2010 , journal =

    Neuscamman, Eric and Yanai, Takeshi and Chan, Garnet Kin-Lic , number =. 2010 , journal =. doi:10.1080/01442351003620540 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1080/01442351003620540 2010

  10. [10]

    and Stella, Martina and Goodpaster, Jason D

    Manby, Frederick R. and Stella, Martina and Goodpaster, Jason D. and Miller, Thomas F. , number =. 2012 , journal =. doi:10.1021/ct300544e , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/ct300544e 2012

  11. [11]

    2021 , journal =

    Yalouz, Saad and Senjean, Bruno and G. 2021 , journal =. doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abd334 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abd334 2021

  12. [12]

    Scott, Charles J. C. and Backhouse, Oliver J. and Booth, George H. , number =. 2023 , journal =. doi:10.1063/5.0143291 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0143291 2023

  13. [13]

    2018 , journal =

    Bockstedte, Michel and Sch. 2018 , journal =. doi:10.1038/s41535-018-0103-6 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-018-0103-6 2018

  14. [14]

    2018 , journal =

    Hirayama, Motoaki and Yamaji, Youhei and Misawa, Takahiro and Imada, Masatoshi , number =. 2018 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.134501 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.134501 2018

  15. [15]

    2020 , journal =

    Ohgoe, Takahiro and Hirayama, Motoaki and Misawa, Takahiro and Ido, Kota and Yamaji, Youhei and Imada, Masatoshi , number =. 2020 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.101.045124 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.045124 2020

  16. [16]

    2015 , journal =

    Shinaoka, Hiroshi and Troyer, Matthias and Werner, Philipp , number =. 2015 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.91.245156 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.245156 2015

  17. [17]

    Daniel and Sauer, Joachim , number =

    Boese, A. Daniel and Sauer, Joachim , number =. 2013 , journal =. doi:10.1039/c3cp52321g , issn =

    work page doi:10.1039/c3cp52321g 2013

  18. [18]

    and Khait, Yuriy G

    Tamukong, Patrick K. and Khait, Yuriy G. and Hoffmann, Mark R. , number =. 2017 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.6b09909 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.6b09909 2017

  19. [19]

    2025 , journal =

    Chen, Siyuan and Yu, Victor Wen-zhe and Jin, Yu and Govoni, Marco and Galli, Giulia , number =. 2025 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00559 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00559 2025

  20. [20]

    , number =

    Harrison, Robert J. , number =. 1991 , journal =. doi:10.1063/1.460537 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.460537 1991

  21. [21]

    2019 , journal =

    Bruneval, Fabien , number =. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00333 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00333 2019

  22. [22]

    2014 , journal =

    El Khatib, Muammar and Bendazzoli, Gian Luigi and Evangelisti, Stefano and Helal, Wissam and Leininger, Thierry and Tenti, Lorenzo and Angeli, Celestino , number =. 2014 , journal =. doi:10.1021/jp503145u , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/jp503145u 2014

  23. [23]

    and Bondybey, Vladimir E

    Merritt, Jeremy M. and Bondybey, Vladimir E. and Heaven, Michael C. , number =. 2009 , journal =. doi:10.1126/science.1174326 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1174326 2009

  24. [24]

    and Cramer, Christopher J

    Gaggioli, Carlo Alberto and Stoneburner, Samuel J. and Cramer, Christopher J. and Gagliardi, Laura , number =. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acscatal.9b01775 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acscatal.9b01775 2019

  25. [25]

    and Karlsson, K

    Aryasetiawan, F. and Karlsson, K. and Jepsen, O. and Sch. 2006 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.74.125106 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.125106 2006

  26. [26]

    and Henderson, Thomas M

    Bulik, Ireneusz W. and Henderson, Thomas M. and Scuseria, Gustavo E. , number =. 2015 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00422 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00422 2015

  27. [27]

    2006 , journal =

    Yanai, Takeshi and Chan, Garnet Kin-Lic , number =. 2006 , journal =. doi:10.1063/1.2196410 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2196410 2006

  28. [28]

    and Durden, Andrew S

    Levine, Benjamin G. and Durden, Andrew S. and Esch, Michael P. and Liang, Fangchun and Shu, Yinan , number =. 2021 , journal =. doi:10.1063/5.0042147 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0042147 2021

  29. [29]

    2019 , journal =

    Alessio, Maristella and Usvyat, Denis and Sauer, Joachim , number =. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01122 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01122 2019

  30. [30]

    and Zgid, Dominika , number =

    Lan, Tran Nguyen and Kananenka, Alexei A. and Zgid, Dominika , number =. 2015 , journal =. doi:10.1063/1.4938562 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4938562 2015

  31. [31]

    , number =

    Baym, Gordon and Kadanoff, Leo P. , number =. 1961 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.124.287 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.124.287 1961

  32. [32]

    and Lichtenstein, Alexander I

    Gull, Emanuel and Millis, Andrew J. and Lichtenstein, Alexander I. and Rubtsov, Alexey N. and Troyer, Matthias and Werner, Philipp , number =. 2011 , journal =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.83.349 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.349 2011

  33. [33]

    2021 , journal =

    Duchemin, Ivan and Blase, Xavier , number =. 2021 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00101 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00101 2021

  34. [34]

    2012 , journal =

    Knizia, Gerald and Chan, Garnet Kin-Lic , number =. 2012 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.186404 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.186404 2012

  35. [35]

    2013 , journal =

    Knizia, Gerald and Chan, Garnet Kin-Lic , number =. 2013 , journal =. doi:10.1021/ct301044e , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/ct301044e 2013

  36. [36]

    2021 , journal =

    Beran, Pavel and Matou. 2021 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00896 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00896 2021

  37. [37]

    , number =

    White, Steven R. , number =. 1993 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.48.10345 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.48.10345 1993

  38. [38]

    and Niquet, Y.-M

    Fuchs, M. and Niquet, Y.-M. and Gonze, X. and Burke, K. , number =. 2005 , journal =. doi:10.1063/1.1858371 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1858371 2005

  39. [39]

    2008 , journal =

    Furche, Filipp , number =. 2008 , journal =. doi:10.1063/1.2977789 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2977789 2008

  40. [40]

    2024 , journal =

    Gao, Hong and Imamura, Satoshi and Kasagi, Akihiko and Yoshida, Eiji , number =. 2024 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01190 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01190 2024

  41. [41]

    Chang, Yueqing and van Loon, Erik G. C. P. and Eskridge, Brandon and Busemeyer, Brian and Morales, Miguel A. and Dreyer, Cyrus E. and Millis, Andrew J. and Zhang, Shiwei and Wehling, Tim O. and Wagner, Lucas K. and R. 2024 , journal =. doi:10.1038/s41524-024-01314-6 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-024-01314-6 2024

  42. [42]

    2023 , journal =

    Park, Jae Woo , number =. 2023 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00688 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00688 2023

  43. [43]

    2019 , journal =

    Dvorak, Marc and Rinke, Patrick , number =. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.99.115134 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.115134 2019

  44. [44]

    2023 , journal =

    Romanova, Mariya and Weng, Guorong and Apelian, Arsineh and Vl. 2023 , journal =. doi:10.1038/s41524-023-01078-5 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-023-01078-5 2023

  45. [45]

    , number =

    Turkowski, Volodymyr and Kabir, Alamgir and Nayyar, Neha and Rahman, Talat S. , number =. 2012 , journal =. doi:10.1063/1.3692613 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3692613 2012

  46. [46]

    Lin, Nan and Marianetti, C. A. and Millis, Andrew J. and Reichman, David R. , number =. 2011 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.096402 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.096402 2011

  47. [47]

    2011 , journal =

    Zgid, Dominika and Chan, Garnet Kin-Lic , number =. 2011 , journal =. doi:10.1063/1.3556707 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3556707 2011

  48. [48]

    , number =

    Georges, Antoine and Kotliar, Gabriel and Krauth, Werner and Rozenberg, Marcelo J. , number =. 1996 , journal =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.68.13 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.68.13 1996

  49. [49]

    2015 , journal =

    Werner, Philipp and Sakuma, Rei and Nilsson, Fredrik and Aryasetiawan, Ferdi , number =. 2015 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.91.125142 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.125142 2015

  50. [50]

    and Karlsson, K

    Nilsson, F. and Karlsson, K. and Aryasetiawan, F. , number =. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.99.075135 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.075135 2019

  51. [51]

    2019 , journal =

    Hirayama, Motoaki and Misawa, Takahiro and Ohgoe, Takahiro and Yamaji, Youhei and Imada, Masatoshi , number =. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.99.245155 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.245155 2019

  52. [52]

    and Savrasov, S

    Kotliar, G. and Savrasov, S. Y. and Haule, K. and Oudovenko, V. S. and Parcollet, O. and Marianetti, C. A. , number =. 2006 , journal =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.78.865 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.78.865 2006

  53. [53]

    1999 , journal =

    Kaledin, L.A and Kaledin, A.L and Heaven, M.C and Bondybey, V.E , month =. 1999 , journal =. doi:10.1016/S0166-1280(98)00425-4 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0166-1280(98)00425-4 1999

  54. [54]

    , number =

    Libisch, Florian and Huang, Chen and Carter, Emily A. , number =. 2014 , journal =. doi:10.1021/ar500086h , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/ar500086h 2014

  55. [55]

    Scott, Charles J. C. and Booth, George H. , number =. 2021 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.245114 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.245114 2021

  56. [56]

    and Aryasetiawan, F

    Biermann, S. and Aryasetiawan, F. and Georges, A. , number =. 2003 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.086402 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.086402 2003

  57. [57]

    and Imada, M

    Aryasetiawan, F. and Imada, M. and Georges, A. and Kotliar, G. and Biermann, S. and Lichtenstein, A. I. , number =. 2004 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.70.195104 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.70.195104 2004

  58. [58]

    1993 , journal =

    Wesolowski, Tomasz Adam and Warshel, Arieh , number =. 1993 , journal =. doi:10.1021/j100132a040 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/j100132a040 1993

  59. [59]

    Dunning, Thom. H. , number =. 1971 , journal =. doi:10.1063/1.1676139 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1676139 1971

  60. [60]

    and Burke, Kieron and Ernzerhof, Matthias , number =

    Perdew, John P. and Burke, Kieron and Ernzerhof, Matthias , number =. 1996 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 1996

  61. [61]

    2025 , journal =

    Wang, Yuqi and Fang, Wei-Hai and Li, Zhendong , number =. 2025 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c00258 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c00258 2025

  62. [62]

    2017 , journal =

    Lan, Tran Nguyen and Zgid, Dominika , number =. 2017 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00689 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00689 2017

  63. [63]

    2022 , journal =

    Sheng, Nan and Vorwerk, Christian and Govoni, Marco and Galli, Giulia , number =. 2022 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00240 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00240 2022

  64. [64]

    2002 , journal =

    Chan, Garnet Kin-Lic and Head-Gordon, Martin , number =. 2002 , journal =. doi:10.1063/1.1449459 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1449459 2002

  65. [65]

    2019 , journal =

    Bruneval, Fabien , number =. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.99.041118 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.041118 2019

  66. [66]

    and Kohn, W

    Hohenberg, P. and Kohn, W. , number =. 1964 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.136.b864 1964

  67. [67]

    and Cimiraglia, R

    Angeli, C. and Cimiraglia, R. and Evangelisti, S. and Leininger, T. and Malrieu, J.-P. , number =. 2001 , journal =. doi:10.1063/1.1361246 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1361246 2001

  68. [68]

    and Malrieu, J

    Huron, B. and Malrieu, J. P. and Rancurel, P. , number =. 1973 , journal =. doi:10.1063/1.1679199 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1679199 1973

  69. [69]

    and Werner, Philipp , number =

    Honerkamp, Carsten and Shinaoka, Hiroshi and Assaad, Fakher F. and Werner, Philipp , number =. 2018 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.235151 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.235151 2018

  70. [70]

    2014 , journal =

    Kaltak, Merzuk and Klime. 2014 , journal =. doi:10.1021/ct5001268 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/ct5001268 2014

  71. [71]

    2017 , journal =

    Hirayama, Motoaki and Miyake, Takashi and Imada, Masatoshi and Biermann, Silke , number =. 2017 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.075102 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.075102 2017

  72. [72]

    2020 , journal =

    F. 2020 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00693 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00693 2020

  73. [73]

    , number =

    Yeh, Chia-Nan and Morales, Miguel A. , number =. 2023 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00615 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00615 2023

  74. [74]

    and Freeman, C

    Tubman, Norm M. and Freeman, C. Daniel and Levine, Daniel S. and Hait, Diptarka and Head-Gordon, Martin and Whaley, K. Birgitta , number =. 2020 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00536 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00536 2020

  75. [75]

    and Shao, Meiyue and Yang, Chao and Neaton, Jeffrey B

    Bruneval, Fabien and Rangel, Tonatiuh and Hamed, Samia M. and Shao, Meiyue and Yang, Chao and Neaton, Jeffrey B. , month =. 2016 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2016.06.019 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2016.06.019 2016

  76. [76]

    and Luo, Sijie and Ma, Dongxia and Olsen, Jeppe and Truhlar, Donald G

    Li Manni, Giovanni and Carlson, Rebecca K. and Luo, Sijie and Ma, Dongxia and Olsen, Jeppe and Truhlar, Donald G. and Gagliardi, Laura , number =. 2014 , journal =. doi:10.1021/ct500483t , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/ct500483t 2014

  77. [77]

    and Musia

    Lyakh, Dmitry I. and Musia. 2012 , journal =. doi:10.1021/cr2001417 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/cr2001417 2012

  78. [78]

    2023 , journal =

    Zhai, Huanchen and Lee, Seunghoon and Cui, Zhi-Hao and Cao, Lili and Ryde, Ulf and Chan, Garnet Kin-Lic , number =. 2023 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.3c06142 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.3c06142 2023

  79. [79]

    , number =

    Li, Chenyang and Evangelista, Francesco A. , number =. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-042018-052416 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-042018-052416 2019

  80. [80]

    and Hu, Weifeng and Sun, Qiming and Chan, Garnet Kin-Lic , number =

    Guo, Sheng and Watson, Mark A. and Hu, Weifeng and Sun, Qiming and Chan, Garnet Kin-Lic , number =. 2016 , journal =. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b01225 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b01225 2016

Showing first 80 references.