pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08178 · v1 · pith:7AJG2KRZnew · submitted 2026-06-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

The fluid-lattice gas isomorphism with application to liquid-vapor equilibrium in physisorbed monolayers

Lev Shevchenko , Volodymyr Kulinskii This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 19:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft
keywords fluid-lattice gas isomorphismbinodal symmetryliquid-vapor equilibriumorder parameterlattice gas modelphysisorbed monolayerscritical point
0
0 comments X

The pith

An order parameter exists that restores exact symmetry to the liquid-vapor binodal over the full coexistence region, mapping any simple fluid onto the lattice gas.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a suitable order parameter symmetrizes the binodal of a molecular fluid not only near the critical point but throughout the two-phase region. This global symmetry produces a direct isomorphism between the fluid and the lattice gas, equivalent to the Ising model. The mapping is tested on two-dimensional Lennard-Jones simulation data and on experimental binodals of physisorbed molecular monolayers. If the construction holds, fluid phase equilibria become equivalent to lattice problems without additional fitting parameters. The work also supplies a theoretical expression for the slope dp/dT along the saturation curve at the critical point and sketches the reduction of the continuous fluid Hamiltonian to an effective spin lattice.

Core claim

The central discovery is the existence of an order parameter under which the liquid-gas binodal of a simple fluid becomes symmetric in the entire coexistence region. This symmetry restores the fluid-lattice gas isomorphism globally, not merely asymptotically near criticality. Validation against two-dimensional Lennard-Jones data and monolayer experiments confirms the mapping. The same construction yields an analog of the Kramers-Wannier duality and a parameter-free estimate for dp/dT on the saturation curve at the critical point.

What carries the argument

The order parameter that symmetrizes the binodal globally, allowing the fluid to be mapped onto the lattice gas (Ising) model.

If this is right

  • The fluid Hamiltonian reduces to an effective quasi-spin lattice model whose solutions apply directly to the original continuous system.
  • The derivative dp/dT along the saturation curve at the critical point follows from the lattice-gas result without additional fitting.
  • The mapping extends to two-dimensional physisorbed monolayers and yields testable predictions for their liquid-vapor equilibria.
  • An analog of the Kramers-Wannier duality transformation exists for the fluid under the symmetrizing order parameter.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same order parameter can be identified in three dimensions, the global fluid-lattice gas mapping would apply to bulk liquids as well.
  • Known exact or high-precision results for the lattice gas could then be imported to predict fluid properties far from criticality.
  • The construction might generalize to other continuous systems whose phase diagrams currently lack global symmetry restoration.

Load-bearing premise

A single order parameter can be defined for the fluid such that binodal symmetry holds exactly across the entire coexistence curve without system-specific adjustments.

What would settle it

If the densities obtained by applying the proposed order parameter to fluid coexistence data deviate systematically from the exact lattice-gas binodal at temperatures well below the critical point, the global isomorphism does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08178 by Lev Shevchenko, Volodymyr Kulinskii.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Binodal data simulations for 2D LJ fluid (left) and experimental data. Dashed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Binodal data of MC simulations for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Comparison between the experimental data from Table II the theoretical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The compressibility factor (18) along the liquid-gas coexisting curve of 2D LJ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Hypothetical KW-duality for 2D LJ fluid. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: KW-duality relation (28) in terms of temperature for 2D LJ fluid. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Liquid-gas equilibrium for a simple molecular fluid is considered in view of the existence of the order parameter, in terms of which the symmetry of the binodal is restored not only in the vicinity of the critical point (critical isomorphism) but also globally in the whole coexistence region. This leads to the mapping between fluid and lattice gas (Ising model). We test this approach against the data on the liquid-gas binodal of a two-dimensional Lennard-Jones fluid and monolayers of molecular fluids. The obtained results allow us to speculate about the analog of the Kramers-Wannier duality in such systems and provide the theoretical estimate for $dp/dT$ on the saturation curve at the critical point. The microscopic grounds of the proposed approach are also discussed, and the transition from the continuous fluid model Hamiltonian to the effective quasi-spin lattice model is outlined.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that an order parameter exists for molecular fluids such that the liquid-vapor binodal is symmetric globally (not just near criticality), enabling an exact mapping to the lattice gas/Ising model. It tests the approach on 2D Lennard-Jones fluid and physisorbed monolayer data, outlines the continuous-to-quasi-spin transition, speculates on a Kramers-Wannier duality analog, and derives a theoretical estimate for dp/dT along the saturation curve at the critical point.

Significance. If the order parameter can be derived independently from the microscopic Hamiltonian without reference to binodal data, the global isomorphism would be a substantive advance for understanding coexistence in fluids and monolayers, potentially yielding falsifiable predictions such as the dp/dT estimate. The machine-checked or parameter-free aspects are not evident from the abstract.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim requires that the order parameter ρ* be defined from the fluid Hamiltonian (or controlled coarse-graining) without reference to measured/simulated coexistence densities; the abstract and skeptic note leave open whether the symmetry is enforced by construction via fitting, which would render the fluid-lattice gas mapping tautological rather than predictive.
  2. The theoretical estimate for dp/dT at the critical point is presented as derived from the mapping; the manuscript must demonstrate (in the relevant derivation section) that this quantity is independent of any parameters fitted to the binodal data, as circularity here would undermine the claim of a non-trivial isomorphism.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract mentions testing against 2D LJ and monolayer data but does not specify quantitative metrics (e.g., deviation from symmetry before/after mapping); these should be reported explicitly with error bars or goodness-of-fit measures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed reading and the constructive major comments. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity on the construction of the order parameter and the independence of the derived quantities.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim requires that the order parameter ρ* be defined from the fluid Hamiltonian (or controlled coarse-graining) without reference to measured/simulated coexistence densities; the abstract and skeptic note leave open whether the symmetry is enforced by construction via fitting, which would render the fluid-lattice gas mapping tautological rather than predictive.

    Authors: The manuscript discusses the microscopic grounds of the proposed approach and outlines the transition from the continuous fluid model Hamiltonian to the effective quasi-spin lattice model. The order parameter is introduced on the basis of symmetry restoration derived from the underlying Hamiltonian rather than by fitting to binodal data. To remove any ambiguity that may remain in the abstract or skeptic note, we will revise the relevant sections to state explicitly that ρ* is obtained from the microscopic model without reference to coexistence densities. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The theoretical estimate for dp/dT at the critical point is presented as derived from the mapping; the manuscript must demonstrate (in the relevant derivation section) that this quantity is independent of any parameters fitted to the binodal data, as circularity here would undermine the claim of a non-trivial isomorphism.

    Authors: The dp/dT estimate follows directly from the isomorphism once the order parameter has been fixed by the Hamiltonian. We will expand the derivation section to provide an explicit step-by-step argument showing that no parameters fitted to binodal data enter the calculation, thereby confirming the independence of the result. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Order parameter introduced to enforce global binodal symmetry, rendering fluid-lattice-gas mapping tautological by construction

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract]
    "Liquid-gas equilibrium for a simple molecular fluid is considered in view of the existence of the order parameter, in terms of which the symmetry of the binodal is restored not only in the vicinity of the critical point (critical isomorphism) but also globally in the whole coexistence region. This leads to the mapping between fluid and lattice gas (Ising model)."

    The order parameter is posited specifically 'in terms of which the symmetry of the binodal is restored ... globally', so the mapping to the lattice gas is obtained by construction once the variable is chosen to enforce that symmetry; no independent microscopic derivation is required or provided for the global case.

full rationale

The paper's core claim is that an order parameter exists restoring binodal symmetry globally (not just near criticality), enabling an exact fluid-to-lattice-gas mapping. This order parameter is defined precisely by the requirement that the binodal becomes symmetric in it across the full coexistence region, with the mapping then following directly. The resulting theoretical estimate for dp/dT at the critical point therefore reduces to a quantity fixed by the same symmetry-enforcing reparametrization rather than an independent derivation from the microscopic Hamiltonian. The approach is tested on 2D LJ and monolayer data, but the symmetry restoration is achieved by the choice of variable, not predicted from first principles. This matches self-definitional circularity; the central isomorphism is not load-bearing beyond the input data used to construct the order parameter.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is provided; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5676 in / 1095 out tokens · 30013 ms · 2026-06-27T19:02:07.299784+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author R. J. \ Baxter ,\ @noop title Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics \ ( publisher Dover ,\ address New York ,\ year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  2. [2]

    Wilson \ and\ author J

    author author K. Wilson \ and\ author J. Kogut ,\ http://books.google.com.ua/books?id=hanYHAAACAAJ title The Renormalization Group and the Epsilon Expansion ,\ Physics letters\ ( publisher North-Holland ,\ year 1974 ) NoStop

    1974

  3. [3]

    author author M. E. \ Fisher ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.70.653 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 70 ,\ pages 653 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.70.653 1998

  4. [4]

    author author M. E. \ Fisher \ and\ author B. Widom ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1671624 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 50 ,\ pages 3756 ( year 1969 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1671624 1969

  5. [5]

    Xu , author P

    author author L. Xu , author P. Kumar , author S. V. \ Buldyrev , author S. H. \ Chen , author P. H. \ Poole , author F. Sciortino ,\ and\ author H. E. \ Stanley ,\ https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507870102 journal journal Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. \ volume 102 ,\ pages 16558 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.0507870102 2005

  6. [6]

    Gorelli , author M

    author author F. Gorelli , author M. Santoro , author T. Scopigno , author M. Krisch ,\ and\ author G. Ruocco ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.245702 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 97 ,\ pages 245702 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.245702 2006

  7. [7]

    author author G. G. \ Simeoni , author T. Bryk , author F. A. \ Gorelli , author M. Krisch , author G. Ruocco , author M. Santoro ,\ and\ author T. Scopigno ,\ http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys1683 journal journal Nat Phys \ volume 6 ,\ pages 503 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys1683 2010

  8. [8]

    author author V. V. \ Brazhkin , author Y. D. \ Fomin , author A. G. \ Lyapin , author V. N. \ Ryzhov ,\ and\ author K. Trachenko ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.85.031203 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 85 ,\ pages 031203 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.85.031203 2012

  9. [9]

    author author J. J. \ Rehr \ and\ author N. D. \ Mermin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.8.472 journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 8 ,\ pages 472 ( year 1973 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.8.472 1973

  10. [10]

    Kulinskii \ and\ author N

    author author V. Kulinskii \ and\ author N. Malomuzh ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2008.11.014 journal journal Physica A \ volume 388 ,\ pages 621 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2008.11.014 2008

  11. [11]

    author author M. A. \ Anisimov \ and\ author J. Wang ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.025703 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 97 ,\ pages 025703 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.025703 2006

  12. [12]

    Sak \ and\ author C

    author author J. Sak \ and\ author C. Vause ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/13/6/011 journal journal J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. \ volume 13 ,\ pages L217 ( year 1980 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/13/6/011 1980

  13. [13]

    Cailletet \ and\ author E

    author author L. Cailletet \ and\ author E. Mathias ,\ https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphystap:018860050054900 journal journal C.R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. \ volume 102 ,\ pages 1202 ( year 1886 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1051/jphystap:018860050054900

  14. [14]

    Apfelbaum , author V

    author author E. Apfelbaum , author V. Vorob'ev ,\ and\ author G. A. \ Martynov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/jp057327c journal journal J. Phys. Chem. B \ volume 110 ,\ pages 8474 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/jp057327c 2006

  15. [15]

    Kulinskii ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/jp911897k journal journal J

    author author V. Kulinskii ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/jp911897k journal journal J. Phys. Chem. B \ volume 114 ,\ pages 2852 ( year 2010 a ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/jp911897k 2010

  16. [16]

    author author A. Z. \ Patashinskii \ and\ author V. L. \ Pokrovsky ,\ @noop title Fluctuation theory of critical phenomena \ ( publisher Pergamon ,\ address Oxford ,\ year 1979 ) NoStop

    1979

  17. [17]

    author author I. C. \ Sanchez , author S. O'Keefe ,\ and\ author J. F. \ Xu ,\ http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b01364 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry B \ volume 120 ,\ pages 3705 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b01364 2016

  18. [18]

    author author L. A. \ Bulavin , author V. L. \ Kulinskyi , author A. M. \ Katts ,\ and\ author A. M. \ Maslechko ,\ https://doi.org/10.5488/cmp.28.23603 journal journal Condensed Matter Physics \ volume 28 ,\ pages 23603 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.5488/cmp.28.23603 2025

  19. [19]

    Kulinskii ,\ https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4891806 journal journal J

    author author V. Kulinskii ,\ https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4891806 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 141 ,\ eid 054503 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4891806 2014

  20. [20]

    author author R. R. \ Singh , author K. S. \ Pitzer , author J. J. \ de Pablo ,\ and\ author J. M. \ Prausnitz ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.458524 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 92 ,\ pages 5463 ( year 1990 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.458524 1990

  21. [21]

    Smit \ and\ author D

    author author B. Smit \ and\ author D. Frenkel ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.460477 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 94 ,\ pages 5663 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.460477 1991

  22. [22]

    Jiang \ and\ author K

    author author S. Jiang \ and\ author K. E. \ Gubbins ,\ https://doi.org/10.1080/00268979500102221 journal journal Mol. Phys. \ volume 86 ,\ pages 599 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1080/00268979500102221 1995

  23. [23]

    Kulinskii ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3499857 journal journal J

    author author V. Kulinskii ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3499857 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 133 ,\ eid 131102 ( year 2010 b ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.3499857/15429633/131102\_1\_online.pdf https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.3499857/15429633/131102\_1\_online.pdf NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3499857 2010

  24. [24]

    author author H. K. \ Kim , author Q. M. \ Zhang ,\ and\ author M. H. W. \ Chan ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.34.4699 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 34 ,\ pages 4699 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.34.4699 1986

  25. [25]

    Patrykiejew ,\ https://doi.org/10.5488/CMP.15.23601 journal journal Condensed Matter Physics \ volume 15 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    author author A. Patrykiejew ,\ https://doi.org/10.5488/CMP.15.23601 journal journal Condensed Matter Physics \ volume 15 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.5488/cmp.15.23601 2012

  26. [26]

    Thomy , author X

    author author A. Thomy , author X. Duval ,\ and\ author J. Regnier ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5729(81)90004-2 journal journal Surface Science Reports \ volume 1 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/0167-5729(81)90004-2 1981

  27. [27]

    author author L. W. \ Bruch , author R. D. \ Diehl ,\ and\ author J. A. \ Venables ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.79.1381 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 79 ,\ pages 1381 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.1381 2007

  28. [28]

    Linstrom \ and\ editor W

    editor P. Linstrom \ and\ editor W. Mallard ,\ eds.,\ http://webbook.nist.gov title NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database 69 \ ( publisher National Institute of Standards and Technology ,\ address Gaithersburg MD ,\ year 2004 )\ p.\ pages 20899 NoStop

    2004

  29. [29]

    Larher \ and\ author B

    author author Y. Larher \ and\ author B. Gilquin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.20.1599 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 20 ,\ pages 1599 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.20.1599 1979

  30. [30]

    author author S. M. \ Maiga \ and\ author S. M. \ Gatica ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2017.11.020 journal journal Chemical Physics \ volume 501 ,\ pages 46 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chemphys.2017.11.020 2017

  31. [31]

    author author E. D. \ Glandt \ and\ author D. D. \ Fitts ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.433702 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 66 ,\ pages 4503 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.433702 1977

  32. [32]

    Reddy \ and\ author S

    author author M. Reddy \ and\ author S. O'Shea ,\ @noop journal journal Canadian Journal of Physics \ volume 64 ,\ pages 677 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    1986

  33. [33]

    author author V. M. \ Trejos , author A. Santos ,\ and\ author F. Gámez ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5029375 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 148 ,\ pages 194505 ( year 2018 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.5029375/13657455/194505\_1\_online.pdf https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-p...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5029375 2018

  34. [34]

    author author H. A. \ Kramers \ and\ author G. H. \ Wannier ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.60.252 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 60 ,\ pages 252 ( year 1941 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.60.252 1941

  35. [35]

    Batschinski ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19063240205 journal journal Ann

    author author A. Batschinski ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19063240205 journal journal Ann. Phys. \ volume 324 ,\ pages 307 ( year 1906 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.19063240205 1906

  36. [36]

    Ben-Amotz \ and\ author D

    author author D. Ben-Amotz \ and\ author D. R. \ Herschbach ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.199000007 journal journal Isr. J. Chem. \ volume 30 ,\ pages 59 ( year 1990 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1002/ijch.199000007 1990

  37. [37]

    Apfelbaum \ and\ author V

    author author E. Apfelbaum \ and\ author V. Vorob'ev ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/jp808817p journal journal J. Phys. Chem. B \ volume 113 ,\ pages 3521 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/jp808817p 2009

  38. [38]

    author author I. R. \ Yukhnovsky \ and\ author M. F. \ Holovko ,\ @noop title Statistical mechanics of the classical equilibrium systems \ ( publisher Naukova Dumka ,\ address Kyiv ,\ year 1980 ) NoStop

    1980

  39. [39]

    Kac ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1724399 journal journal The Physics of Fluids \ volume 2 ,\ pages 8 ( year 1959 ) NoStop

    author author M. Kac ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1724399 journal journal The Physics of Fluids \ volume 2 ,\ pages 8 ( year 1959 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1724399 1959

  40. [40]

    Nishimori ,\ https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.66.1169 journal journal Progress of Theoretical Physics \ volume 66 ,\ pages 1169 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

    author author H. Nishimori ,\ https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.66.1169 journal journal Progress of Theoretical Physics \ volume 66 ,\ pages 1169 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp.66.1169 1981