pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08582 · v1 · pith:45G7WTA7new · submitted 2026-06-07 · ✦ hep-th

Soft Algebra for {cal N}=4 SYM

Luis F. Alday , Andrew Strominger This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 18:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords scattering amplitudessoft theoremsN=4 SYMfactorizationS-algebraplanar limitIR divergencesWilson loop duality
0
0 comments X

The pith

In planar N=4 SYM a chosen all-orders factorization separates amplitudes so the hard part obeys the tree-level soft theorem with no loop corrections and represents the undeformed S-algebra.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper defines a factorization of n-particle scattering amplitudes in planar N=4 super Yang-Mills into an IR-divergent soft factor and an IR-finite hard factor that encodes all higher-loop corrections. It shows that this hard factor satisfies the same soft-gluon theorem as the tree-level amplitude, without any quantum corrections. The hard factor also supplies a representation of the tree-level S-algebra generated by a tower of soft gluons. These properties are derived from the BDS one-loop exponentiation of the splitting function together with amplitude/Wilson-loop duality. The result indicates that the soft symmetries encoded in the S-algebra survive in the hard sector at every loop order under the stated assumptions.

Core claim

Scattering amplitudes admit the factorization A_n = A_soft_n × A_hard_n, where A_soft_n is IR divergent and A_hard_n is IR finite. For planar N=4 SYM the authors specify an all-orders version of this split such that A_hard_n obeys an uncorrected tree-level soft theorem and furnishes a representation of the undeformed tree-level S-algebra generated by soft gluons. The conclusions follow from BDS one-loop exponentiation of the splitting function and amplitude/Wilson-loop duality.

What carries the argument

The all-orders soft-hard factorization of planar amplitudes, with A_hard_n carrying the IR-finite higher-loop content.

If this is right

  • The soft theorem for the hard amplitude receives no loop corrections at any order.
  • The S-algebra generated by soft gluons remains exactly the tree-level algebra when represented on A_hard_n.
  • Soft-gluon insertions continue to act on the hard amplitude exactly as they do at tree level.
  • All IR divergences are isolated in the soft factor, leaving the hard factor to obey tree-level Ward identities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same factorization can be defined in non-planar or non-supersymmetric theories, the same uncorrected soft theorems might hold there as well.
  • The algebra representation could be used to constrain higher-loop amplitudes by demanding consistency with the undeformed soft generators.
  • This separation may simplify the study of celestial operator algebras by removing IR divergences from the hard sector.

Load-bearing premise

The results rest on BDS one-loop exponentiation of the splitting function and amplitude/Wilson-loop duality.

What would settle it

An explicit two-loop or higher computation of A_hard_n for a process with a soft gluon that produces a correction to the tree-level soft factor would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08582 by Andrew Strominger, Luis F. Alday.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Collinear limit of a polygonal null Wilson loop. Subleading corrections correspond to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: figure 2. We then construct a reference null Wilson loop with four sides [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The reference square splits the original polygon into a top polygon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: As τ → ∞ the lines xj,j+1 and xj+1,j+2 approach the bottom line of the reference square, becoming collinear. If we furthermore take σ → ±∞ then xj+1 approaches either xj or xj+2. As shown in [62], the collinear limit corresponds to τ → ∞; see figure 3. More precisely, as we take τ → ∞, the points xj+1 and xj+2 collapse into the bottom line of the reference square, and the lines xj,j+1 and xj+1,j+2 become c… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Physical process P1+P4 → P2+P3+P5+P6. All vectors are null, and time runs upwards. u2 → e −2πiu2, u1 → u1, u3 → u3. (2.29) The physically admissible timelike collinear limits within this configuration are either x 2 24 → 0 or x 2 15 → 0. Both correspond to u2 → 0 with u1 + u3 → 1. From this, we can then reach the physical soft limits x23 → 0, x24 → 0, etc. This corresponds precisely to the collinear expans… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Tessellation of Wn into n − 5 reference squares was partially supported by the Simons Collaboration for Celestial Holography, the Moore Foun￾dation via the Black Hole Initiative, and DOE grant DE-SC/0007870. L.F.A.’s work is partially supported by the STFC grant ST/T000864/1. For the purpose of open access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) ve… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: We take the soft limit as shown, with δ q → 0 and p (δ) n−1 → pn−1, p (δ) 1 → p1. δ is the small parameter in the soft limit. • The reference pentagon W (1) 5 formed by R1, ρ pn−2, p (δ) n−1 , δ q, p(δ) 1 , which is used in the defi￾nition of the ratio function Rˆ. • The reference hexagon W (1) 6 formed by pn−2, p (δ) n−1 , δ q, p(δ) 1 , λp2, and R2, whose cross-ratios control the WL OPE. The superscripts … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Scattering amplitudes of $n$ particles in nonabelian gauge theories admit factorizations of the general form $\mathcal{A}_n \;=\; \mathcal{A}^{\rm soft}_n \times \mathcal{A}^{\rm hard}_n$, where $\mathcal{A}^{\rm soft}_n$ is IR divergent, while $\mathcal{A}^{\rm hard}_n$ is IR finite and encodes the higher loop corrections to scattering. We specify a particular all-orders definition of this factorization for planar ${\cal N}=4$ super Yang-Mills (SYM) and argue that the resulting $\mathcal{A}_n^{\rm hard}$ obeys an uncorrected tree-level soft theorem. Moreover it furnishes a representation of the undeformed tree-level $\cal S$-algebra generated by a tower of soft gluons. The results follow from several commonly invoked assumptions for ${\cal N}=4$ SYM, including BDS one-loop exponentiation of the splitting function and amplitude/Wilson-loop duality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript specifies a particular all-orders definition of the soft-hard factorization A_n = A_soft_n × A_hard_n for planar N=4 SYM, with A_soft_n containing all IR divergences. Under the assumptions of BDS one-loop exponentiation of the splitting function and amplitude/Wilson-loop duality, it claims that the resulting IR-finite A_n^hard obeys the uncorrected tree-level soft theorem and furnishes a representation of the undeformed tree-level S-algebra generated by a tower of soft gluons.

Significance. If the derivation from the two stated assumptions is correct, the result supplies an explicit all-orders realization of the tree-level soft algebra inside the hard amplitudes. This would strengthen the connection between IR factorization and soft symmetries in maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills, providing a concrete example where higher-loop corrections do not deform the tree-level S-algebra structure.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states that the results follow from BDS exponentiation and WL duality, but the main text should include an explicit step-by-step derivation (perhaps in §3 or §4) showing how the all-orders factorization definition is constructed from these inputs and how the soft theorem for A_hard follows without corrections.
  2. Notation for the S-algebra generators and the precise definition of the 'undeformed tree-level S-algebra' should be introduced with a short review or reference to prior literature on soft algebras in gauge theory, to make the representation claim self-contained.
  3. Any explicit checks or examples (e.g., for low-point amplitudes or specific loop orders) that illustrate the uncorrected soft theorem should be highlighted, even if they are illustrative rather than exhaustive.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The work defines a specific all-orders soft-hard factorization in planar N=4 SYM under the standard assumptions of BDS exponentiation and amplitude/Wilson-loop duality, showing that the IR-finite hard amplitude satisfies the undeformed tree-level soft theorem and realizes the tree-level S-algebra.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation conditional on listed external assumptions

full rationale

The abstract explicitly states that the results (uncorrected tree-level soft theorem for A_n^hard and representation of the undeformed S-algebra) follow from commonly invoked external assumptions including BDS one-loop exponentiation of the splitting function and amplitude/Wilson-loop duality. These are independent results from other authors with no overlap indicated as load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or ansatze smuggled via citation are present in the provided claim structure. The central claim remains conditional on these inputs without internal reduction by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on two domain assumptions that are standard in N=4 SYM but are not derived inside the paper.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption BDS one-loop exponentiation of the splitting function
    Invoked to specify the all-orders factorization of the amplitude.
  • domain assumption amplitude/Wilson-loop duality
    Used to argue that the hard amplitude obeys the tree-level soft theorem and represents the S-algebra.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5692 in / 1332 out tokens · 21260 ms · 2026-06-27T18:10:58.123052+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Topics in Celestial holography: A bottom-up perspective

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted

    A review of symmetries, celestial CFT, twistor theory interplay, and AdS/CFT connections in the bottom-up search for a celestial dual to flat-space quantum gravity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 59 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Strominger,Asymptotic Symmetries of Yang-Mills Theory,JHEP07(2014) 151, [arXiv:1308.0589]

    A. Strominger,Asymptotic Symmetries of Yang-Mills Theory,JHEP07(2014) 151, [arXiv:1308.0589]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  2. [2]

    Strominger,On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,JHEP07(2014) 152, [arXiv:1312.2229]

    A. Strominger,On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,JHEP07(2014) 152, [arXiv:1312.2229]. 33

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  3. [3]

    Costello and N

    K. Costello and N. M. Paquette,Celestial holography meets twisted holography: 4d amplitudes from chiral correlators,JHEP10(2022) 193, [arXiv:2201.02595]

    arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Guevara, E

    A. Guevara, E. Himwich, M. Pate, and A. Strominger,Holographic symmetry algebras for gauge theory and gravity,JHEP11(2021) 152, [arXiv:2103.03961]

    arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Strominger,w 1+∞ Algebra and the Celestial Sphere: Infinite Towers of Soft Graviton, Photon, and Gluon Symmetries,Phys

    A. Strominger,w 1+∞ Algebra and the Celestial Sphere: Infinite Towers of Soft Graviton, Photon, and Gluon Symmetries,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021), no. 22 221601

    2021

  6. [6]

    Freidel, D

    L. Freidel, D. Pranzetti, and A.-M. Raclariu,Higher spin dynamics in gravity andw 1+∞ celestial symmetries,arXiv:2112.15573

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    A. Kmec, L. Mason, R. Ruzziconi, and A. Sharma,S-algebra in gauge theory: twistor, spacetime and holographic perspectives,Class. Quant. Grav.42(2025), no. 19 195008, [arXiv:2506.01888]

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Elvang, C

    H. Elvang, C. R. T. Jones, and S. G. Naculich,Soft photon and graviton theorems in effective field theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.118(Jun, 2017) 231601

    2017

  9. [9]

    J. Mago, L. Ren, A. Y. Srikant, and A. Volovich,Deformedw 1+∞ Algebras in the Celestial CFT,arXiv:2111.11356

    arXiv

  10. [10]

    Bhardwaj, L

    R. Bhardwaj, L. Lippstreu, L. Ren, M. Spradlin, A. Yelleshpur Srikant, and A. Volovich, Loop-level gluon OPEs in celestial holography,JHEP11(2022) 171, [arXiv:2208.14416]

    arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Bittleston,On the associativity of 1-loop corrections to the celestial operator product in gravity,arXiv:2211.06417

    R. Bittleston,On the associativity of 1-loop corrections to the celestial operator product in gravity,arXiv:2211.06417

    arXiv

  12. [12]

    Costello and N

    K. Costello and N. M. Paquette,On the associativity of one-loop corrections to the celestial OPE,arXiv:2204.05301

    arXiv

  13. [13]

    Costello, N

    K. Costello, N. M. Paquette, and A. Sharma,Top-Down Holography in an Asymptotically Flat Spacetime,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023), no. 6 061602, [arXiv:2208.14233]

    arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Costello, N

    K. Costello, N. M. Paquette, and A. Sharma,Burns space and holography,JHEP10 (2023) 174, [arXiv:2306.00940]

    arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Sheta, A

    A. Sheta, A. Strominger, A. Tropper, and H. Wei,Soft Algebras in AdS 4 from Light Ray Operators in CFT 3,arXiv:2601.00096

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    Strominger and H

    A. Strominger and H. Wei,EVERY CFT 3 HAS ANL Λw1+∞ SYMMETRY, arXiv:2603.26459. 34

    arXiv

  17. [17]

    T. R. Taylor and B. Zhu,w1+∞Algebra with a Cosmological Constant and the Celestial Sphere,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024), no. 22 221602, [arXiv:2312.00876]

    arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Bittleston, G

    R. Bittleston, G. Bogna, S. Heuveline, A. Kmec, L. Mason, and D. Skinner,On AdS 4 deformations of celestial symmetries,JHEP07(2024) 010, [arXiv:2403.18011]

    arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    J. H. Schwarz,Simons Collaboration for Celestial Holography Kick-Off, 2023. Talk at Harvard University, October 2023

    2023

  20. [20]

    Z. Bern, S. Davies, and J. Nohle,On Loop Corrections to Subleading Soft Behavior of Gluons and Gravitons,Phys. Rev. D90(2014), no. 8 085015, [arXiv:1405.1015]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  21. [21]

    Bonocore, E

    D. Bonocore, E. Laenen, L. Magnea, S. Melville, L. Vernazza, and C. D. White,A factorization approach to next-to-leading-power threshold logarithms,JHEP06(2015) 008, [arXiv:1503.05156]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  22. [22]

    Brandhuber, E

    A. Brandhuber, E. Hughes, B. Spence, and G. Travaglini,One-Loop Soft Theorems via Dual Superconformal Symmetry,JHEP03(2016) 084, [arXiv:1511.06716]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    Del Duca,High-energy Bremsstrahlung Theorems for Soft Photons,Nucl

    V. Del Duca,High-energy Bremsstrahlung Theorems for Soft Photons,Nucl. Phys. B345 (1990) 369–388

    1990

  24. [24]

    Magnea,Non-abelian infrared divergences on the celestial sphere,JHEP05(2021) 282, [arXiv:2104.10254]

    L. Magnea,Non-abelian infrared divergences on the celestial sphere,JHEP05(2021) 282, [arXiv:2104.10254]

    arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    H. A. Gonz´ alez and F. Rojas,The structure of IR divergences in celestial gluon amplitudes,JHEP2021(2021), no. 06 171, [arXiv:2104.12979]

    arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Magnea and E

    L. Magnea and E. Zunino,Non-abelian soft radiation data for a celestial theory, arXiv:2512.22104

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    V. E. Fernandez,One-loop corrections to the celestial chiral algebra from Koszul Duality, arXiv:2302.14292

    arXiv

  28. [28]

    Beisert, J

    N. Beisert, J. Henn, T. McLoughlin, and J. Plefka,One-Loop Superconformal and Yangian Symmetries of Scattering Amplitudes in N=4 Super Yang-Mills,JHEP04(2010) 085, [arXiv:1002.1733]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  29. [29]

    A. J. Larkoski,Conformal Invariance of the Subleading Soft Theorem in Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. D90(2014), no. 8 087701, [arXiv:1405.2346]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  30. [30]

    Anastasiou, Z

    C. Anastasiou, Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, and D. A. Kosower,Planar amplitudes in maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.91(2003) 251602, [hep-th/0309040]. 35

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  31. [31]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, and V. A. Smirnov,Iteration of planar amplitudes in maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory at three loops and beyond,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 085001, [hep-th/0505205]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  32. [32]

    L. F. Alday and J. M. Maldacena,Gluon scattering amplitudes at strong coupling,JHEP 06(2007) 064, [arXiv:0705.0303]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  33. [33]

    J. M. Drummond, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev,Conformal properties of four-gluon planar amplitudes and Wilson loops,Nucl. Phys. B795(2008) 385–408, [arXiv:0707.0243]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  34. [34]

    Brandhuber, P

    A. Brandhuber, P. Heslop, and G. Travaglini,MHV amplitudes in N=4 super Yang-Mills and Wilson loops,Nucl. Phys. B794(2008) 231–243, [arXiv:0707.1153]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  35. [35]

    J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev,Conformal Ward identities for Wilson loops and a test of the duality with gluon amplitudes,Nucl. Phys. B 826(2010) 337–364, [arXiv:0712.1223]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  36. [36]

    Arkani-Hamed, J

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, S. Caron-Huot, and J. Trnka,The All-Loop Integrand For Scattering Amplitudes in Planar N=4 SYM,JHEP01(2011) 041, [arXiv:1008.2958]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  37. [37]

    Arkani-Hamed, L

    N. Arkani-Hamed, L. J. Dixon, A. J. McLeod, M. Spradlin, J. Trnka, and A. Volovich, Solving Scattering inN= 4 Super-Yang-Mills Theory,arXiv:2207.10636

    arXiv

  38. [38]

    Bianchi, S

    M. Bianchi, S. He, Y.-t. Huang, and C. Wen,More on Soft Theorems: Trees, Loops and Strings,Phys. Rev. D92(2015), no. 6 065022, [arXiv:1406.5155]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  39. [39]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar, and D. A. Kosower,One loop n point gauge theory amplitudes, unitarity and collinear limits,Nucl. Phys. B425(1994) 217–260, [hep-ph/9403226]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  40. [40]

    Basso, A

    B. Basso, A. Sever, and P. Vieira,Spacetime and Flux Tube S-Matrices at Finite Coupling for N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.111(2013), no. 9 091602, [arXiv:1303.1396]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  41. [41]

    Basso, A

    B. Basso, A. Sever, and P. Vieira,Space-time S-matrix and Flux tube S-matrix II. Extracting and Matching Data,JHEP01(2014) 008, [arXiv:1306.2058]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  42. [42]

    Basso, A

    B. Basso, A. Sever, and P. Vieira,Space-time S-matrix and Flux-tube S-matrix III. The two-particle contributions,JHEP08(2014) 085, [arXiv:1402.3307]. 36

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  43. [43]

    Basso, S

    B. Basso, S. Caron-Huot, and A. Sever,Adjoint BFKL at finite coupling: a short-cut from the collinear limit,JHEP01(2015) 027, [arXiv:1407.3766]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  44. [44]

    J. M. Drummond and G. Papathanasiou,Hexagon OPE Resummation and Multi-Regge Kinematics,JHEP02(2016) 185, [arXiv:1507.08982]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  45. [45]

    Arkani-Hamed, M

    N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Pate, A.-M. Raclariu, and A. Strominger,Celestial amplitudes from UV to IR,JHEP08(2021) 062, [arXiv:2012.04208]

    arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    Kapec, M

    D. Kapec, M. Perry, A.-M. Raclariu, and A. Strominger,Infrared Divergences in QED, Revisited,Phys. Rev. D96(2017), no. 8 085002, [arXiv:1705.04311]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  47. [47]

    S. Choi, U. Kol, and R. Akhoury,Asymptotic Dynamics in Perturbative Quantum Gravity and BMS Supertranslations,JHEP01(2018) 142, [arXiv:1708.05717]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  48. [48]

    Choi and R

    S. Choi and R. Akhoury,BMS Supertranslation Symmetry Implies Faddeev-Kulish Amplitudes,JHEP02(2018) 171, [arXiv:1712.04551]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    Nande, M

    A. Nande, M. Pate, and A. Strominger,Soft Factorization in QED from 2D Kac-Moody Symmetry,JHEP02(2018) 079, [arXiv:1705.00608]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    Magnea and G

    L. Magnea and G. F. Sterman,Analytic continuation of the Sudakov form-factor in QCD, Phys. Rev. D42(1990) 4222–4227

    1990

  51. [51]

    G. F. Sterman and M. E. Tejeda-Yeomans,Multiloop amplitudes and resummation,Phys. Lett. B552(2003) 48–56, [hep-ph/0210130]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  52. [52]

    J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev,On planar gluon amplitudes/Wilson loops duality,Nucl. Phys. B795(2008) 52–68, [arXiv:0709.2368]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  53. [53]

    J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev,Hexagon Wilson loop = six-gluon MHV amplitude,Nucl. Phys. B815(2009) 142–173, [arXiv:0803.1466]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  54. [54]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. A. Kosower, R. Roiban, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu, and A. Volovich, The Two-Loop Six-Gluon MHV Amplitude in Maximally Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 045007, [arXiv:0803.1465]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  55. [55]

    L. J. Mason and D. Skinner,The Complete Planar S-matrix of N=4 SYM as a Wilson Loop in Twistor Space,JHEP12(2010) 018, [arXiv:1009.2225]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  56. [56]

    Caron-Huot,Notes on the scattering amplitude / Wilson loop duality,JHEP07(2011) 058, [arXiv:1010.1167]

    S. Caron-Huot,Notes on the scattering amplitude / Wilson loop duality,JHEP07(2011) 058, [arXiv:1010.1167]. 37

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  57. [57]

    J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, V. A. Smirnov, and E. Sokatchev,Magic identities for conformal four-point integrals,JHEP01(2007) 064, [hep-th/0607160]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  58. [58]

    J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev,Dual superconformal symmetry of scattering amplitudes in N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory,Nucl. Phys. B828 (2010) 317–374, [arXiv:0807.1095]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  59. [59]

    Berkovits and J

    N. Berkovits and J. Maldacena,Fermionic T-Duality, Dual Superconformal Symmetry, and the Amplitude/Wilson Loop Connection,JHEP09(2008) 062, [arXiv:0807.3196]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  60. [60]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, and D. A. Kosower,Two-loop g —>gg splitting amplitudes in QCD, JHEP08(2004) 012, [hep-ph/0404293]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  61. [61]

    L. J. Dixon and Y.-T. Liu,Lifting Heptagon Symbols to Functions,JHEP10(2020) 031, [arXiv:2007.12966]

    arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto, J. Maldacena, A. Sever, and P. Vieira,An Operator Product Expansion for Polygonal null Wilson Loops,JHEP04(2011) 088, [arXiv:1006.2788]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  63. [63]

    Gaiotto, J

    D. Gaiotto, J. Maldacena, A. Sever, and P. Vieira,Pulling the straps of polygons,JHEP12 (2011) 011, [arXiv:1102.0062]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  64. [64]

    Caron-Huot and S

    S. Caron-Huot and S. He,Jumpstarting the All-Loop S-Matrix of Planar N=4 Super Yang-Mills,JHEP07(2012) 174, [arXiv:1112.1060]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  65. [65]

    Bartels, L

    J. Bartels, L. N. Lipatov, and A. Sabio Vera,BFKL Pomeron, Reggeized gluons and Bern-Dixon-Smirnov amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 045002, [arXiv:0802.2065]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  66. [66]

    Hatsuda,Wilson loop OPE, analytic continuation and multi-Regge limit,JHEP10 (2014) 038, [arXiv:1404.6506]

    Y. Hatsuda,Wilson loop OPE, analytic continuation and multi-Regge limit,JHEP10 (2014) 038, [arXiv:1404.6506]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  67. [67]

    L. J. Dixon and I. Esterlis,All orders results for self-crossing Wilson loops mimicking double parton scattering,JHEP07(2016) 116, [arXiv:1602.02107]. [Erratum: JHEP 08, 131 (2016)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  68. [68]

    Bargheer, V

    T. Bargheer, V. Chestnov, and V. Schomerus,The Multi-Regge Limit from the Wilson Loop OPE,JHEP05(2020) 002, [arXiv:1906.00990]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  69. [69]

    A. B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu, and A. Volovich,Classical Polylogarithms for Amplitudes and Wilson Loops,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 151605, [arXiv:1006.5703]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  70. [70]

    Arkani-Hamed, F

    N. Arkani-Hamed, F. Cachazo, and J. Kaplan,What is the Simplest Quantum Field Theory?,JHEP09(2010) 016, [arXiv:0808.1446]. 38

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  71. [71]

    Basso,Exciting the GKP string at any coupling,Nucl

    B. Basso,Exciting the GKP string at any coupling,Nucl. Phys. B857(2012) 254–334, [arXiv:1010.5237]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  72. [72]

    V. P. Nair,A current algebra for some gauge theory amplitudes,Physics Letters B214 (1988), no. 2 215–218

    1988

  73. [73]

    Georgiou, E

    G. Georgiou, E. W. N. Glover, and V. V. Khoze,Non-MHV tree amplitudes in gauge theory,JHEP07(2004) 048, [hep-th/0407027]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  74. [74]

    G. P. Korchemsky and E. Sokatchev,Symmetries and analytic properties of scattering amplitudes in N=4 SYM theory,Nucl. Phys. B832(2010) 1–51, [arXiv:0906.1737]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  75. [75]

    J. M. Drummond and J. M. Henn,All tree-level amplitudes in N=4 SYM,JHEP04(2009) 018, [arXiv:0808.2475]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  76. [76]

    Sever, P

    A. Sever, P. Vieira, and T. Wang,OPE for Super Loops,JHEP11(2011) 051, [arXiv:1108.1575]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  77. [77]

    L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond, and J. M. Henn,Analytic result for the two-loop six-point NMHV amplitude in N=4 super Yang-Mills theory,JHEP01(2012) 024, [arXiv:1111.1704]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  78. [78]

    L. J. Dixon and M. von Hippel,Bootstrapping an NMHV amplitude through three loops, JHEP10(2014) 065, [arXiv:1408.1505]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  79. [79]

    Hodges,Eliminating spurious poles from gauge-theoretic amplitudes,JHEP05(2013) 135, [arXiv:0905.1473]

    A. Hodges,Eliminating spurious poles from gauge-theoretic amplitudes,JHEP05(2013) 135, [arXiv:0905.1473]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  80. [80]

    L. J. Mason and D. Skinner,Dual Superconformal Invariance, Momentum Twistors and Grassmannians,JHEP11(2009) 045, [arXiv:0909.0250]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

Showing first 80 references.