pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08830 · v1 · pith:V7O2Y3X6new · submitted 2026-06-07 · ✦ hep-ph · nucl-th

Nuclear parton distributions and nuclear shadowing

Petja Paakkinen , Vadim Guzey This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 17:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph nucl-th
keywords nuclear parton distribution functionsnuclear shadowingcollinear factorizationsmall-x QCDheavy-ion collisionsultraperipheral collisionsElectron-Ion Collider
0
0 comments X

The pith

Model-agnostic fits to nuclear hard-process data confirm collinear factorization and leading-twist dominance for nuclear PDFs even at small x.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews how the distributions of quarks and gluons inside nuclei differ from those in free protons, with the main effect at small momentum fraction being nuclear shadowing, a suppression of parton densities. It collects evidence from experiments on hard scattering with nuclei and shows that global analyses performed without committing to any particular shadowing model still describe the data accurately. This outcome indicates that the standard perturbative framework used for proton PDFs continues to work when nuclei are the target. The review contrasts several competing models for the origin of shadowing and sketches how upcoming measurements can tighten the constraints further.

Core claim

Model-agnostic extractions of nuclear PDFs from global data on hard processes with nuclei support the validity of collinear factorization and the dominance of leading-twist nuclear PDFs, including in the small-x region governed by nuclear shadowing.

What carries the argument

Nuclear parton distribution functions (nPDFs), which encode the momentum distributions of quarks and gluons bound inside nuclei and exhibit modifications such as shadowing relative to free-nucleon PDFs.

If this is right

  • Photonuclear processes measured in ultraperipheral heavy-ion collisions at the LHC supply independent constraints on nuclear gluon distributions at small x.
  • Lepton-nucleus deep-inelastic scattering at the future Electron-Ion Collider will extend the kinematic reach and reduce uncertainties on nuclear PDFs.
  • Improved nPDF determinations will sharpen predictions for hard probes in heavy-ion collisions used to study quark-gluon plasma properties.
  • Consistency between different hard processes strengthens the case that nuclear modifications are universal and factorizable.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the leading-twist picture holds, nuclear effects can be absorbed into modified PDFs without invoking new non-perturbative mechanisms at the scales currently accessible.
  • The same framework may then be applied to other nuclear targets or to nuclei at higher energies where small-x dynamics become more pronounced.
  • Tension could appear if saturation-based models predict effects that cannot be reproduced by any leading-twist nPDF fit once higher-precision data arrive.

Load-bearing premise

The collected experimental measurements and model comparisons are representative enough to establish that leading-twist contributions dominate over higher-twist or non-perturbative effects across the studied kinematics.

What would settle it

A global re-analysis of existing or new data that requires large, kinematics-dependent higher-twist corrections to achieve acceptable fits would undermine the claim of leading-twist dominance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08830 by Petja Paakkinen, Vadim Guzey.

Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: The structure function ratio Fig. 1 (Left) Measure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Nuclear modification factor RpPb as a function of pT for prompt D0 meson production ´ık et al., 2016) parametrisations of nuclear PDFs. Adapted from Acharya et al. (2022a) under CC BY 4.0. (Right) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this contribution, we review the physics and phenomenology of nuclear parton distribution functions (PDFs), with a particular focus on the small-x region of nuclear shadowing. We summarise experimental evidence for nuclear modifications of PDFs and discuss their theoretical explanations; in particular, we contrast different models of nuclear shadowing. We also overview model-agnostic extractions of nuclear PDFs from global data on hard processes with nuclei, emphasizing the validity of collinear factorization and the dominance of leading-twist nuclear PDFs. Finally, we discuss perspectives for present and future precision studies of nuclear PDFs and small-x QCD dynamics, including photonuclear reactions in heavy-ion ultraperipheral collisions at the Large Hadron Collider and lepton-nucleus deep inelastic scattering at the future Electron-Ion Collider.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reviews the physics and phenomenology of nuclear parton distribution functions (nPDFs), with emphasis on small-x nuclear shadowing. It summarizes experimental evidence for nuclear modifications, contrasts theoretical models of shadowing, overviews model-agnostic global extractions from hard processes in nuclei that support collinear factorization and leading-twist dominance, and outlines perspectives for LHC ultraperipheral collisions and future EIC lepton-nucleus DIS.

Significance. As a review, the manuscript synthesizes current understanding of nPDFs and provides a useful reference point for the community by underscoring the empirical support for factorization from global fits. The forward-looking discussion of precision measurements at existing and planned facilities adds value for planning future work in small-x QCD and nuclear structure.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the scope clearly but does not indicate the approximate number of data sets or the kinematic range covered by the reviewed global fits; adding one sentence would improve reader orientation.
  2. Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state whether the plotted ratios are normalized to free-proton PDFs or to a specific baseline nPDF set.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, accurate summary of its scope, and recommendation to accept. No major comments were raised that require addressing.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper with no derivation chain or predictions

full rationale

This is a review summarizing experimental evidence, model contrasts, and existing extractions of nuclear PDFs. No original derivations, equations, or predictions are presented whose outputs reduce to the paper's own inputs or self-citations by construction. The central claim rests on external data and prior literature rather than any internal reduction. No load-bearing steps match any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the authors.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5646 in / 1063 out tokens · 21131 ms · 2026-06-27T17:51:38.672096+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

226 extracted references · 213 canonical work pages · 102 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Color Glass Condensate and High Energy Scattering in QCD

    Iancu, Edmond and Venugopalan, Raju. The Color glass condensate and high-energy scattering in QCD. Quark-gluon plasma 4. 2003. doi:10.1142/9789812795533_0005. arXiv:hep-ph/0303204

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/9789812795533_0005 2003

  2. [2]

    and Hashamipour, Hadi and Soleymaninia, Maryam

    Salajegheh, Maral and Khanpour, Hamzeh and Mei ner, Ulf-G. and Hashamipour, Hadi and Soleymaninia, Maryam. Determination of diffractive PDFs from a global QCD analysis of inclusive diffractive DIS and dijet cross-section measurements at HERA. Phys. Rev. D. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.094038. arXiv:2301.10284

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.094038 2023

  3. [3]

    and Hashamipour, Hadi and Soleymaninia, Maryam

    Salajegheh, Maral and Khanpour, Hamzeh and Mei ner, Ulf-G. and Hashamipour, Hadi and Soleymaninia, Maryam. Global QCD analysis of diffractive parton distribution function considering higher twist corrections within the xFitter framework. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.054012. arXiv:2206.13788

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.054012 2022

  4. [4]

    First global next-to-leading order determination of diffractive parton distribution functions and their uncertainties within the {\tt xFitter} framework

    Goharipour, Muhammad and Khanpour, Hamzeh and Guzey, Vadim. First global next-to-leading order determination of diffractive parton distribution functions and their uncertainties within the xFitter framework. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2018. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5787-z. arXiv:1802.01363

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5787-z 2018

  5. [5]

    The Hadronic Final State at HERA

    Newman, Paul and Wing, Matthew. The Hadronic Final State at HERA. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2014. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.86.1037. arXiv:1308.3368

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.1037 2014

  6. [6]

    Collider Physics at HERA

    Klein, M. and Yoshida, R. Collider Physics at HERA. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2008. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2008.05.002. arXiv:0805.3334

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2008.05.002 2008

  7. [7]

    Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier - Understanding the glue that binds us all

    Accardi, A. and others. Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier : Understanding the glue that binds us all. Eur. Phys. J. A. 2016. doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16268-9. arXiv:1212.1701

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16268-9 2016

  8. [8]

    Evidence for J/ suppression in incoherent photonuclear production

    Acharya, Shreyasi and others. Evidence for J/ suppression in incoherent photonuclear production. 2025. arXiv:2503.18708

    arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Observation of impact parameter dependent modifications of nuclear parton distributions in photonuclear Pb+Pb collisions at s_NN = 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    Aad, Georges and others. Observation of impact parameter dependent modifications of nuclear parton distributions in photonuclear Pb+Pb collisions at s_NN = 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector. 2026. arXiv:2604.20559

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  10. [10]

    New probes of nuclear gluon dynamics through photoproduction of charm in inelastic ultra-peripheral PbPb collisions with ALICE

    Nese, Sigurd. New probes of nuclear gluon dynamics through photoproduction of charm in inelastic ultra-peripheral PbPb collisions with ALICE. EPJ Web Conf. 2026. doi:10.1051/epjconf/202636413001. arXiv:2509.11814

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/202636413001 2026

  11. [11]

    Inclusive open charm photoproduction in ultraperipheral collisions at the LHC with in the generalized photon-nucleus fixed-order next-to-leading logarithm framework

    Cacciari, Matteo and Innocenti, Gian Michele and Sta \'s to, Anna M. Inclusive open charm photoproduction in ultraperipheral collisions at the LHC with in the generalized photon-nucleus fixed-order next-to-leading logarithm framework. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/1w13-r2tr. arXiv:2506.09893

    work page doi:10.1103/1w13-r2tr 2025

  12. [12]

    Inclusive D0 photoproduction in ultraperipheral collisions

    Gimeno-Estivill, Patricia and Lappi, Tuomas and M. Inclusive D0 photoproduction in ultraperipheral collisions. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/7741-585p. arXiv:2503.16108

    work page doi:10.1103/7741-585p 2025

  13. [13]

    and Santana, Luana and Sch

    Goncalves, Victor P. and Santana, Luana and Sch. Investigating the inclusive D0 photoproduction in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at the Large Hadron Collider. Phys. Lett. B. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139859. arXiv:2506.02223

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139859 2025

  14. [14]

    Inclusive dijet photoproduction in ultraperipheral heavy-ion collisions at the CERN LHC in next-to-leading order QCD

    Guzey, V. and Klasen, M. Inclusive dijet photoproduction in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions at the CERN Large Hadron Collider in next-to-leading order QCD. Phys. Rev. C. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99.065202. arXiv:1811.10236

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.065202 2019

  15. [15]

    and Guzey, Vadim and Helenius, Ilkka and Paakkinen, Petja and Paukkunen, Hannu

    Eskola, Kari J. and Guzey, Vadim and Helenius, Ilkka and Paakkinen, Petja and Paukkunen, Hannu. Spatial resolution of dijet photoproduction in near-encounter ultraperipheral nuclear collisions. Phys. Rev. C. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.110.054906. arXiv:2404.09731

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.110.054906 2024

  16. [16]

    and Flett, Christopher A

    Eskola, Kari J. and Flett, Christopher A. and Guzey, Vadim and L. Predictions for exclusive photoproduction in ultraperipheral Pb + Pb collisions at the LHC at next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2023. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11927-8. arXiv:2303.03007

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11927-8 2023

  17. [17]

    and Flett, Christopher A

    Eskola, Kari J. and Flett, Christopher A. and Guzey, Vadim and L. Exclusive J/ photoproduction in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb collisions at the CERN Large Hadron Collider calculated at next-to-leading order perturbative QCD. Phys. Rev. C. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.106.035202. arXiv:2203.11613

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.106.035202 2022

  18. [18]

    and Flett, Christopher A

    Eskola, Kari J. and Flett, Christopher A. and Guzey, Vadim and L. Next-to-leading order perturbative QCD predictions for exclusive J/ photoproduction in oxygen-oxygen and lead-lead collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Phys. Rev. C. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.107.044912. arXiv:2210.16048

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.107.044912 2023

  19. [19]

    Nuclear geometry at high energy from exclusive vector meson production

    M. Nuclear geometry at high energy from exclusive vector meson production. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074019. arXiv:2207.03712

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.074019 2022

  20. [20]

    and Harland-Lang, L

    Dyndal, M. and Harland-Lang, L. A. A First Account of the Impact of Ion Electromagnetic Dissociation on Event Exclusivity in Ultraperipheral LHC Collisions. 2026. arXiv:2604.19879

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Accessing transverse nucleon and gluon distributions in heavy nuclei using coherent vector meson photoproduction at high energies in ion ultraperipheral collisions

    Guzey, V. and Strikman, M. and Zhalov, M. Accessing transverse nucleon and gluon distributions in heavy nuclei using coherent vector meson photoproduction at high energies in ion ultraperipheral collisions. Phys. Rev. C. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.025204. arXiv:1611.05471

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.95.025204 2017

  22. [22]

    Coherent photoproduction of J/ in nucleus-nucleus collisions in the color dipole approach. Phys. Rev. C. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99.044905. arXiv:1901.07989

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.044905 2019

  23. [23]

    Ryskin, M. G. Diffractive J / psi electroproduction in LLA QCD. Z. Phys. C. 1993. doi:10.1007/BF01555742

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01555742 1993

  24. [24]

    and Klein, Spencer R

    Bertulani, Carlos A. and Klein, Spencer R. and Nystrand, Joakim. Physics of ultra-peripheral nuclear collisions. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2005. doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.55.090704.151526. arXiv:nucl-ex/0502005

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.55.090704.151526 2005

  25. [25]

    Contreras, J. G. and Tapia Takaki, J. D. Ultra-peripheral heavy-ion collisions at the LHC. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A. 2015. doi:10.1142/S0217751X15420129

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x15420129 2015

  26. [26]

    Klein, Spencer R. and M. Imaging the nucleus with high-energy photons. Nature Rev. Phys. 2019. doi:10.1038/s42254-019-0107-6. arXiv:1910.10858

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254-019-0107-6 2019

  27. [27]

    First measurement of the t -dependence of coherent J/ photonuclear production

    Acharya, Shreyasi and others. First measurement of the t -dependence of coherent J/ photonuclear production. Phys. Lett. B. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136280. arXiv:2101.04623

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136280 2021

  28. [28]

    First Measurement of the |t| Dependence of Incoherent J/ Photonuclear Production

    Acharya, Shreyasi and others. First Measurement of the |t| Dependence of Incoherent J/ Photonuclear Production. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.162302. arXiv:2305.06169

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.162302 2024

  29. [29]

    The Color Glass Condensate

    Gelis, Francois and Iancu, Edmond and Jalilian-Marian, Jamal and Venugopalan, Raju. The Color Glass Condensate. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2010. doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.010909.083629. arXiv:1002.0333

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.010909.083629 2010

  30. [30]

    Operator expansion for high-energy scattering

    Balitsky, I. Operator expansion for high-energy scattering. Nucl. Phys. B. 1996. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00638-9. arXiv:hep-ph/9509348

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00638-9 1996

  31. [31]

    Small-x F_2 Structure Function of a Nucleus Including Multiple Pomeron Exchanges

    Kovchegov, Yuri V. Small x F(2) structure function of a nucleus including multiple pomeron exchanges. Phys. Rev. D. 1999. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.034008. arXiv:hep-ph/9901281

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.60.034008 1999

  32. [32]

    Geometric scaling in inclusive e A reactions and nonlinear perturbative QCD

    Freund, A. and Rummukainen, K. and Weigert, H. and Schafer, A. Geometric scaling in inclusive eA reactions and nonlinear perturbative QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.222002. arXiv:hep-ph/0210139

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.222002 2003

  33. [33]

    Unveiling saturation effects from nuclear structure function measurements at the EIC

    Marquet, Cyrille and Moldes, Manoel R. and Zurita, P \' a. Unveiling saturation effects from nuclear structure function measurements at the EIC. Phys. Lett. B. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.07.035. arXiv:1702.00839

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.07.035 2017

  34. [34]

    and Contreras, J

    Cepila, J. and Contreras, J. G. and Matas, M. Predictions for nuclear structure functions from the impact-parameter dependent Balitsky-Kovchegov equation. Phys. Rev. C. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.102.044318. arXiv:2002.11056

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.102.044318 2020

  35. [35]

    Coherent and incoherent $\mathrm{J/}\psi$ photonuclear production in an energy-dependent hot-spot model

    Cepila, Jan and Contreras, Jesus Guillermo and Krelina, Michal. Coherent and incoherent J/ photonuclear production in an energy-dependent hot-spot model. Phys. Rev. C. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.024901. arXiv:1711.01855

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.97.024901 2018

  36. [36]

    and Cepila, J

    Bendova, D. and Cepila, J. and Contreras, J. G. and Matas, M. Photonuclear J/ production at the LHC: Proton-based versus nuclear dipole scattering amplitudes. Phys. Lett. B. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136306. arXiv:2006.12980

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136306 2021

  37. [37]

    J/Psi production in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb and p+Pb collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider

    Lappi, T. and Mantysaari, H. J/|psi production in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb and p +Pb collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Phys. Rev. C. 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.032201. arXiv:1301.4095

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.87.032201 2013

  38. [38]

    Probing subnucleon scale fluctuations in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions

    M. Probing subnucleon scale fluctuations in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions. Phys. Lett. B. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.07.063. arXiv:1703.09256

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.07.063 2017

  39. [39]

    Gon c alves, V. P. and Machado, M. V. T. and Moreira, B. D. and Navarra, F. S. and dos Santos, G. Sampaio. Color dipole predictions for the exclusive vector meson photoproduction in pp , pPb , and PbPb collisions at run 2 LHC energies. Phys. Rev. D. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.094027. arXiv:1710.10070

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.094027 2017

  40. [40]

    Finite-size effects on small-x evolution and saturation in proton and nuclear targets

    M. Finite-size effects on small-x evolution and saturation in proton and nuclear targets. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.054033. arXiv:2411.13533

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.054033 2025

  41. [41]

    The Structure Function Ratios F2(Li)/F2(D) and F2(C)/F2(D) at small x

    Arneodo, M. and others. The Structure Function ratios F2(li) / F2(D) and F2(C) / F2(D) at small x. Nucl. Phys. B. 1995. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00023-2. arXiv:hep-ex/9504002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00023-2 1995

  42. [42]

    Adams, M. R. and others. Saturation of shadowing at very low x_ BJ. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3266

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.3266 1992

  43. [43]

    Resummed QCD Power Corrections to Nuclear Shadowing

    Qiu, Jian-wei and Vitev, Ivan. Resummed QCD power corrections to nuclear shadowing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.262301. arXiv:hep-ph/0309094

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.262301 2004

  44. [44]

    Gribov, L. V. and Levin, E. M. and Ryskin, M. G. Semihard Processes in QCD. Phys. Rept. 1983. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(83)90022-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(83)90022-4 1983

  45. [45]

    and Qiu, Jian-wei

    Mueller, Alfred H. and Qiu, Jian-wei. Gluon Recombination and Shadowing at Small Values of x. Nucl. Phys. B. 1986. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90164-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90164-1 1986

  46. [46]

    Eskola, K. J. and Qiu, Jian-wei and Wang, Xin-Nian. Perturbative gluon shadowing in heavy nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1994. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.36. arXiv:nucl-th/9307025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.36 1994

  47. [47]

    Adams, M. R. and others. Shadowing in Inelastic Scattering of Muons on Carbon, Calcium and Lead at Low x_ Bj. Z. Phys. C. 1995. doi:10.1007/BF01624583. arXiv:hep-ex/9505006

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/bf01624583 1995

  48. [48]

    Charmonium and $e^+e^-$ pair photoproduction at mid-rapidity in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=2.76 TeV

    Abbas, E. and others. Charmonium and e^+e^- pair photoproduction at mid-rapidity in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at s_ NN =2.76 TeV. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2013. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2617-1. arXiv:1305.1467

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2617-1 2013

  49. [49]

    Coherent J/psi photoproduction in ultra-peripheral PbPb collisions at sqrt(s[NN]) = 2.76 TeV with the CMS experiment

    Khachatryan, Vardan and others. Coherent J/ photoproduction in ultra-peripheral PbPb collisions at s_ NN = 2.76 TeV with the CMS experiment. Phys. Lett. B. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.07.001. arXiv:1605.06966

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.07.001 2017

  50. [50]

    Coherent J/$\psi$ photoproduction in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

    Abelev, Betty and others. Coherent J/ photoproduction in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at s_ NN = 2.76 TeV. Phys. Lett. B. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.11.059. arXiv:1209.3715

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.11.059 2013

  51. [51]

    Coherent J/ and ' photoproduction at midrapidity in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at s_ NN = 5.02 TeV

    Acharya, Shreyasi and others. Coherent J/ and ' photoproduction at midrapidity in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at s_ NN = 5.02 TeV. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2021. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09437-6. arXiv:2101.04577

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09437-6 2021

  52. [52]

    Energy dependence of coherent photonuclear production of J/ mesons in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at s _ NN = 5.02 TeV

    Acharya, Shreyasi and others. Energy dependence of coherent photonuclear production of J/ mesons in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at s _ NN = 5.02 TeV. JHEP. 2023. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2023)119. arXiv:2305.19060

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2023)119 2023

  53. [53]

    Probing Small Bjorken-x Nuclear Gluonic Structure via Coherent J/ Photoproduction in Ultraperipheral Pb-Pb Collisions at sNN=5.02 \, \, TeV

    Tumasyan, Armen and others. Probing Small Bjorken-x Nuclear Gluonic Structure via Coherent J/ Photoproduction in Ultraperipheral Pb-Pb Collisions at sNN=5.02 \, \, TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.262301. arXiv:2303.16984

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.262301 2023

  54. [54]

    and others

    Aaij, R. and others. Study of exclusive photoproduction of charmonium in ultra-peripheral lead-lead collisions. JHEP. 2023. doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2023)146. arXiv:2206.08221

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2023)146 2023

  55. [55]

    Measurement of coherent exclusive $J/\psi\to\mu^+\mu^-$ production in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\textrm{NN}}}=5.36$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

    Aad, Georges and others. Measurement of coherent exclusive J/ ^ + ^ - production in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb collisions at s_ NN =5.36 TeV with the ATLAS detector. JHEP. 2026. doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2026)020. arXiv:2509.04135

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2026)020 2026

  56. [56]

    Observation of nuclear suppression in coherent Y(1S) photoproduction off heavy nuclei at the LHC

    Belyaev, Andrey and others. Observation of nuclear suppression in coherent Y(1S) photoproduction off heavy nuclei at the LHC. 2026. arXiv:2604.05814

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    Photoproduction of J/psi and of high mass e+e- in ultra-peripheral Au+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV

    Afanasiev, S. and others. Photoproduction of J/psi and of high mass e+e- in ultra-peripheral Au+Au collisions at s**(1/2) = 200-GeV. Phys. Lett. B. 2009. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.07.061. arXiv:0903.2041

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.07.061 2009

  58. [58]

    Abdulhamid, M. I. and others. Exclusive J/ , (2s), and e+e - pair production in Au+Au ultraperipheral collisions at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider. Phys. Rev. C. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.110.014911. arXiv:2311.13632

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.110.014911 2024

  59. [59]

    Abdulhamid, M. I. and others. Observation of Strong Nuclear Suppression in Exclusive J/ Photoproduction in Au+Au Ultraperipheral Collisions at RHIC. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.052301. arXiv:2311.13637

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.052301 2024

  60. [60]

    Probing the Gluonic Structure of the Deuteron with J/ Photoproduction in d+Au Ultraperipheral Collisions

    Abdallah, Mohamed and others. Probing the Gluonic Structure of the Deuteron with J/ Photoproduction in d+Au Ultraperipheral Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.122303. arXiv:2109.07625

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.122303 2022

  61. [61]

    Measurement of photonuclear jet production in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02 \, \, TeV with the ATLAS detector

    Aad, Georges and others. Measurement of photonuclear jet production in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02 \, \, TeV with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.052006. arXiv:2409.11060

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.052006 2025

  62. [62]

    Measurement of D$^0$ meson photoproduction in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions

    Chekhovsky, Vladimir and others. Measurement of D0 Meson Photoproduction in Ultraperipheral Heavy Ion Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2026. doi:10.1103/lckg-sdh9. arXiv:2509.08626

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/lckg-sdh9 2026

  63. [63]

    Aschenauer, E. C. and Fazio, S. and Lee, J. H. and Mantysaari, H. and Page, B. S. and Schenke, B. and Ullrich, T. and Venugopalan, R. and Zurita, P. The electron ion collider: assessing the energy dependence of key measurements. Rept. Prog. Phys. 2019. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aaf216. arXiv:1708.01527

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aaf216 2019

  64. [64]

    Kopeliovich, B. Z. and Krelina, M. and Nemchik, J. and Potashnikova, I. K. Ultraperipheral nuclear collisions as a source of heavy quarkonia. Phys. Rev. D. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054005. arXiv:2008.05116

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.054005 2023

  65. [65]

    Gluon shadowing in nuclei and the role of the cc g state in the coherent photoproduction of J/ in nucleus-nucleus collisions. Phys. Lett. B. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138917. arXiv:2406.10371

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138917 2024

  66. [66]

    Nuclear Shadowing and Coherence Length for Longitudinal and Transverse Photons

    Kopeliovich, Boris Z. and Raufeisen, Jorg and Tarasov, Alexander V. Nuclear shadowing and coherence length for longitudinal and transverse photons. Phys. Rev. C. 2000. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.62.035204. arXiv:hep-ph/0003136

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.62.035204 2000

  67. [67]

    An Impact Parameter Dipole Saturation Model

    Kowalski, Henri and Teaney, Derek. An Impact parameter dipole saturation model. Phys. Rev. D. 2003. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.114005. arXiv:hep-ph/0304189

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.68.114005 2003

  68. [68]

    Saturation and BFKL dynamics in the HERA data at small x

    Iancu, E. and Itakura, K. and Munier, S. Saturation and BFKL dynamics in the HERA data at small x. Phys. Lett. B. 2004. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.02.040. arXiv:hep-ph/0310338

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.02.040 2004

  69. [69]

    Exclusive diffractive processes at HERA within the dipole picture

    Kowalski, H. and Motyka, L. and Watt, G. Exclusive diffractive processes at HERA within the dipole picture. Phys. Rev. D. 2006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.074016. arXiv:hep-ph/0606272

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.074016 2006

  70. [70]

    Nuclear enhancement of universal dynamics of high parton densities

    Kowalski, H. and Lappi, T. and Venugopalan, R. Nuclear enhancement of universal dynamics of high parton densities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.022303. arXiv:0705.3047

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.022303 2008

  71. [71]

    Saturation Effects in Deep Inelastic Scattering at low $Q^2$ and its Implications on Diffraction

    Golec-Biernat, Krzysztof J. and Wusthoff, M. Saturation effects in deep inelastic scattering at low Q**2 and its implications on diffraction. Phys. Rev. D. 1998. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.014017. arXiv:hep-ph/9807513

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.014017 1998

  72. [72]

    Soft gluons in the infinite momentum wave function and the BFKL pomeron

    Mueller, Alfred H. Soft gluons in the infinite momentum wave function and the BFKL pomeron. Nucl. Phys. B. 1994. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90116-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90116-3 1994

  73. [73]

    A simple model for nuclear structure functions at small $x$ in the dipole picture

    Armesto, N. A Simple model for nuclear structure functions at small x in the dipole picture. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2002. doi:10.1007/s10052-002-1021-z. arXiv:hep-ph/0206017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s10052-002-1021-z 2002

  74. [74]

    Kopeliovich, B. Z. and Nemchik, J. and Potashnikova, I. K. and Schmidt, I. Gluon Shadowing in DIS off Nuclei. J. Phys. G. 2008. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/35/11/115010. arXiv:0805.4613

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0954-3899/35/11/115010 2008

  75. [75]

    Interplay of Soft and Hard Interactions in Nuclear Shadowing at High $Q^2$ and Low x

    Kopeliovich, Boris and Povh, Bogdan. Interplay of soft and hard interactions in nuclear shadowing at high q**2 and low x. Z. Phys. A. 1997. doi:10.1007/s002180050202. arXiv:nucl-th/9607035

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s002180050202 1997

  76. [76]

    Evidence for nuclear gluon shadowing from the ALICE measurements of PbPb ultraperipheral exclusive J/{\psi} production

    Guzey, V. and Kryshen, E. and Strikman, M. and Zhalov, M. Evidence for nuclear gluon shadowing from the ALICE measurements of PbPb ultraperipheral exclusive J/ production. Phys. Lett. B. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.08.043. arXiv:1305.1724

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.08.043 2013

  77. [77]

    Exclusive J/{\psi} production in ultraperipheral collisions at the LHC: constrains on the gluon distributions in the proton and nuclei

    Guzey, V. and Zhalov, M. Exclusive J/ production in ultraperipheral collisions at the LHC: constrains on the gluon distributions in the proton and nuclei. JHEP. 2013. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2013)207. arXiv:1307.4526

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2013)207 2013

  78. [78]

    and Strikman, M

    Guzey, V. and Strikman, M. Nuclear suppression of coherent J/ photoproduction in heavy-ion ultraperipheral collisions and leading twist nuclear shadowing. Phys. Rev. C. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.110.045201. arXiv:2404.17476

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.110.045201 2024

  79. [79]

    Nuclear shadowing in deep inelastic scattering on nuclei: leading twist versus eikonal approaches

    Frankfurt, L. and Guzey, V. and McDermott, M. and Strikman, M. Nuclear shadowing in deep inelastic scattering on nuclei: Leading twist versus eikonal approaches. JHEP. 2002. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/02/027. arXiv:hep-ph/0201230

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/02/027 2002

  80. [80]

    Nuclear shadowing in Glauber-Gribov theory with Q2-evolution

    Armesto, Nestor and Kaidalov, Alexei B. and Salgado, Carlos A. and Tywoniuk, Konrad. Nuclear shadowing in Glauber-Gribov theory with Q2-evolution. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2010. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1360-0. arXiv:1003.2947

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1360-0 2010

Showing first 80 references.