pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.09491 · v1 · pith:G2ELU43Pnew · submitted 2026-06-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-ph

Spectral distortion anisotropies from photon to dark photon conversions

Sara Evangelista , Jens Chluba , Bryce Cyr This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 15:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph
keywords dark photonsspectral distortionsCMB anisotropieskinetic mixingresonant conversionsPlanck constraintsiso-curvature perturbations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Resonant photon to dark photon conversions imprint anisotropic spectral distortions on the CMB whose multipole shape is controlled by the dark photon mass.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes how resonant conversions populate an initially empty dark photon sector and produce direction-dependent spectral distortions in the CMB. It shows that the dark photon mass sets the multipole dependence of the resulting power spectra while the kinetic mixing parameter fixes their overall strength. Using the Frequency Hierarchy framework the authors generate transfer functions and cross-power spectra across the parameter space and derive Planck-based limits on the minimal dark photon model. These limits are only slightly weaker than the existing monopole bounds from COBE/FIRAS. The work also notes that high-redshift conversions can source iso-curvature-type temperature perturbations.

Core claim

We extend previous spectral distortion studies of the monopole spectrum to anisotropic spectral distortions, using the newly developed Frequency Hierarchy (FH) framework of CosmoTherm. We illustrate the physics by presenting detailed computations of the photon transfer functions and distortion cross power spectra throughout the dark photon parameter space. We find that the dark photon mass explicitly controls the shape (i.e., multipole-dependence) of the signal power spectra, while the overall amplitude of the signal is determined by the kinetic mixing parameter of the model. Using these results, we place complementary limits on the minimal dark photon model using data from Planck, finding t

What carries the argument

Frequency Hierarchy (FH) framework inside CosmoTherm, which computes photon transfer functions and distortion cross-power spectra arising from resonant photon-dark photon conversions.

If this is right

  • Dark photon mass directly sets the multipole dependence of the distortion power spectra.
  • Kinetic mixing parameter sets the overall amplitude of the anisotropic signal.
  • Planck data yield limits on the minimal dark photon model that are only marginally weaker than COBE/FIRAS monopole limits.
  • Conversions at redshifts larger than 2 million can add iso-curvature-type perturbations to the temperature field.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If high-redshift conversions indeed source measurable iso-curvature modes, they could tighten bounds in parameter regions where distortion anisotropies thermalize away.
  • The mass-dependent shape provides an orthogonal handle that could separate dark-photon signals from other sources of spectral-distortion anisotropy in future data.

Load-bearing premise

Resonant photon to dark photon conversions in an initially unpopulated dark sector are accurately modeled by the Frequency Hierarchy framework of CosmoTherm across the relevant redshifts, including the assumption that conversions at z greater than 2 million produce iso-curvature perturbations.

What would settle it

A future measurement of the multipole dependence of CMB spectral-distortion anisotropies that deviates from the mass-dependent shape predicted by the FH calculations for any given dark photon mass and mixing value.

read the original abstract

Dark photons are a gauge boson of a hypothetical dark sector, representing one of the most-studied minimal extensions of the Standard Model, with wide-ranging theoretical and observational implications. Here, we consider scenarios in which an initially unpopulated dark photon sector is populated via resonant photon to dark photon conversions. This process leads to observable spectral distortions in the cosmic microwave background (CMB), that can be used to constrain these models. We extend previous spectral distortion studies of the monopole spectrum to anisotropic spectral distortions, using the newly developed Frequency Hierarchy (FH) framework of CosmoTherm. We illustrate the physics by presenting detailed computations of the photon transfer functions and distortion cross power spectra throughout the dark photon parameter space. We find that the dark photon mass explicitly controls the shape (i.e., multipole-dependence) of the signal power spectra, while the overall amplitude of the signal is determined by the kinetic mixing parameter of the model. Using these results, we place complementary limits on the minimal dark photon model using data from Planck, finding that the constraints are only marginally weaker than those obtained with COBE/FIRAS data for the average (monopole) distortion. In addition, we compute the corrections to the standard temperature field, arguing that conversions at redshifts larger than $2\times 10^6$ may add iso-curvature type perturbations, which could lead to novel constraints in regimes where distortion anisotropies thermalize.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends spectral distortion studies of dark photon models to anisotropies by computing photon transfer functions and distortion cross-power spectra with the newly developed Frequency Hierarchy framework in CosmoTherm. It claims that dark photon mass controls the multipole dependence of the signal power spectra while the kinetic mixing parameter sets the overall amplitude, enabling Planck constraints on the minimal dark photon model that are only marginally weaker than COBE/FIRAS monopole bounds. The work also argues that conversions at z > 2×10^6 may source iso-curvature perturbations to the temperature field.

Significance. If the Frequency Hierarchy modeling of resonant conversions holds, the separation of mass-dependent shape from mixing-dependent amplitude offers a new handle on dark photon parameter space using existing CMB anisotropy data, providing complementary limits to monopole-only analyses and potentially opening iso-curvature channels at high redshift.

major comments (2)
  1. [Framework and Computations (referenced in abstract)] The central claims on multipole shape control by dark photon mass and the resulting Planck constraints rest on the Frequency Hierarchy framework's treatment of resonant conversions and high-redshift (z > 2×10^6) iso-curvature sourcing. No cross-validation against the standard Boltzmann hierarchy, limit-case tests, or explicit transfer-function derivations are shown to confirm that the frequency hierarchy truncation accurately captures anisotropic sourcing across the relevant redshifts.
  2. [Iso-curvature discussion (abstract)] The assertion that conversions at z > 2×10^6 add iso-curvature-type perturbations to the temperature field (abstract) is load-bearing for the novel-constraint discussion, yet the thermalization modeling and transition from distortion anisotropies to iso-curvature are not derived or quantified with explicit equations or redshift thresholds.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'detailed computations of the photon transfer functions' are presented, but without citing specific figures, equations, or tables showing the mass-dependent multipole shapes, the reader cannot directly assess the claimed parameter separation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review. The comments highlight important areas where the manuscript can be strengthened, particularly regarding validation of the Frequency Hierarchy framework and the iso-curvature discussion. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and tests.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Framework and Computations (referenced in abstract)] The central claims on multipole shape control by dark photon mass and the resulting Planck constraints rest on the Frequency Hierarchy framework's treatment of resonant conversions and high-redshift (z > 2×10^6) iso-curvature sourcing. No cross-validation against the standard Boltzmann hierarchy, limit-case tests, or explicit transfer-function derivations are shown to confirm that the frequency hierarchy truncation accurately captures anisotropic sourcing across the relevant redshifts.

    Authors: We agree that explicit cross-validation of the Frequency Hierarchy (FH) framework for anisotropic resonant conversions is not presented in the current manuscript. The FH approach and its implementation in CosmoTherm are described in the referenced companion work, but limit-case tests and direct comparisons to the standard Boltzmann hierarchy for the distortion transfer functions are indeed absent here. In the revised version, we will add a dedicated subsection (likely in Section 3) that includes (i) analytic limit-case comparisons for the photon transfer functions, (ii) tests of the FH truncation against known resonant conversion regimes, and (iii) a brief discussion of how the anisotropic sourcing is captured. These additions will directly support the claims on mass-dependent multipole shapes and the Planck constraints. We view this as a necessary improvement. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Iso-curvature discussion (abstract)] The assertion that conversions at z > 2×10^6 add iso-curvature-type perturbations to the temperature field (abstract) is load-bearing for the novel-constraint discussion, yet the thermalization modeling and transition from distortion anisotropies to iso-curvature are not derived or quantified with explicit equations or redshift thresholds.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the transition from distortion anisotropies to iso-curvature perturbations at z > 2×10^6 is asserted in the abstract and briefly mentioned in the text but is not accompanied by explicit equations or a quantified derivation. The redshift threshold follows from the standard thermalization epoch in the literature (where Compton and double-Compton processes erase spectral distortions), yet the mapping to iso-curvature modes is not derived. In revision we will expand the discussion section with a short derivation outlining how thermalized anisotropic distortions source iso-curvature perturbations to the temperature field, include the relevant equations, and specify the redshift threshold with supporting references. This will make the novel-constraint argument self-contained. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results are computational outputs from external framework

full rationale

The paper derives the mass-dependent shape of distortion power spectra and mixing-parameter amplitude from photon transfer functions computed in the FH framework of CosmoTherm. These are model outputs under standard cosmological assumptions rather than quantities fitted to the target data and then relabeled as predictions. No equations reduce by construction to inputs, no self-citation chain is load-bearing for the central claim, and the framework is treated as an independent computational tool. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

Central claim depends on resonant conversion mechanism and accuracy of the FH framework, both introduced as domain assumptions without independent verification in the abstract.

free parameters (2)
  • dark photon mass
    Explicitly stated to control multipole dependence of power spectra
  • kinetic mixing parameter
    Explicitly stated to set overall amplitude of the signal
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Resonant photon to dark photon conversions populate an initially unpopulated dark sector
    Core process generating the distortions
  • domain assumption Frequency Hierarchy framework of CosmoTherm correctly computes anisotropic photon transfer functions and distortion spectra
    Basis for all presented transfer functions and power spectra
invented entities (1)
  • dark photon no independent evidence
    purpose: Gauge boson of a hypothetical dark sector that mixes with photons
    Hypothetical particle whose mass and mixing are being constrained

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5789 in / 1306 out tokens · 28728 ms · 2026-06-27T15:49:36.166814+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Buckley, Sean M

    Lotty Ackerman, Matthew R. Buckley, Sean M. Carroll, and Marc Kamionkowski. Dark Matter and Dark Radiation.Phys. Rev. D, 79:023519, 2009

    2009

  2. [2]

    Adams, Jared Barron, Bryce Cyr, and Xiuyuan Zhang

    Duncan K. Adams, Jared Barron, Bryce Cyr, and Xiuyuan Zhang. CMB Spectral Distortions from Resonant Conversions in Atomic Dark Sectors. 2 2026

    2026

  3. [3]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck.Astron. Astrophys., 641:A1, 2020

    2018

  4. [4]

    Antel et al

    C. Antel et al. Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2022 Workshop Report.Eur . Phys. J. C, 83(12):1122, 2023

    2022

  5. [5]

    Dark photon constraints from CMB temperature anisotropies.JCAP, 11:049, 2024

    Andres Aramburo-Garcia, Kyrylo Bondarenko, Alexey Boyarsky, Pavlo Kashko, Josef Pradler, Anastasia Sokolenko, Roi Kugel, Matthieu Schaller, and Joop Schaye. Dark photon constraints from CMB temperature anisotropies.JCAP, 11:049, 2024

    2024

  6. [6]

    WISPy Cold Dark Matter.JCAP, 06:013, 2012

    Paola Arias, Davide Cadamuro, Mark Goodsell, Joerg Jaeckel, Javier Redondo, and Andreas Ringwald. WISPy Cold Dark Matter.JCAP, 06:013, 2012

    2012

  7. [7]

    Ruderman

    Giorgi Arsenadze, Andrea Caputo, Xucheng Gan, Hongwan Liu, and Joshua T. Ruderman. Shaping dark photon spectral distortions.JHEP, 03:018, 2025

    2025

  8. [8]

    Precision Cosmological Constraints on Atomic Dark Matter.JHEP, 10:095, 2023

    Saurabh Bansal, Jared Barron, David Curtin, and Yuhsin Tsai. Precision Cosmological Constraints on Atomic Dark Matter.JHEP, 10:095, 2023

    2023

  9. [9]

    Dror, Xucheng Gan, and Joshua T

    Asher Berlin, JeffA. Dror, Xucheng Gan, and Joshua T. Ruderman. Millicharged relics reveal massless dark photons.JHEP, 05:046, 2023

    2023

  10. [10]

    Reviving MeV-GeV Indirect Detection with Inelastic Dark Matter.Phys

    Asher Berlin, Gordan Krnjaic, and Elena Pinetti. Reviving MeV-GeV Indirect Detection with Inelastic Dark Matter.Phys. Rev. D, 110(3):035015, 2024

    2024

  11. [11]

    Bianchini and G

    F. Bianchini and G. Fabbian. CMB spectral distortions revisited: A new take onµdistortions and primordial non-Gaussianities from FIRAS data.Physical Review D, 106(6):063527, September 2022

    2022

  12. [12]

    Burigana, L

    C. Burigana, L. Danese, and G. de Zotti. Formation and evolution of early distortions of the microwave background spectrum - A numerical study.Astronomy&Astrophysics, 246:49–58, June 1991

    1991

  13. [13]

    Camphuis, W

    E. Camphuis, W. Quan, L. Balkenhol, A. R. Khalife, F. Ge, F. Guidi, N. Huang, G. P. Lynch, Y . Omori, C. Trendafilova, A. J. Anderson, B. Ansarinejad, M. Archipley, P. S. Barry, K. Benabed, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, F. R. Bouchet, L. Bryant, M. G. Campitiello, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, P. Chaubal, P. M. Chichura, A. Choksh...

    2019

  14. [14]

    The Dark Photon: a 2026 Perspective

    Andrea Caputo and Rouven Essig. The Dark Photon: a 2026 Perspective. 2026. Contribution to Encyclopedia of Particle Physics

    2026

  15. [15]

    Ruderman

    Andrea Caputo, Hongwan Liu, Siddharth Mishra-Sharma, and Joshua T. Ruderman. Dark Photon Oscillations in Our Inhomogeneous Universe.Phys. Rev. Lett., 125(22):221303, 2020

    2020

  16. [16]

    Millar, Ciaran A

    Andrea Caputo, Alexander J. Millar, Ciaran A. J. O’Hare, and Edoardo Vitagliano. Dark photon limits: A handbook.Phys. Rev. D, 104(9):095029, 2021

    2021

  17. [17]

    The Heavy Dark Photon Handbook: Cosmological and Astrophysical Bounds.Phys

    Andrea Caputo, Jaeyoung Park, and Seokhoon Yun. The Heavy Dark Photon Handbook: Cosmological and Astrophysical Bounds.Phys. Rev. D, 2026. in press

    2026

  18. [18]

    J. Chluba. Green’s function of the cosmological thermalization problem.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 434:352–357, September 2013

    2013

  19. [19]

    J. Chluba. The Cosmic Microwave Background: Spectral Distortions. 1 2025

    2025

  20. [20]

    Chluba and D

    J. Chluba and D. Jeong. Teasing bits of information out of the CMB energy spectrum.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 438:2065–2082, March 2014

    2065

  21. [21]

    Chluba and R

    J. Chluba and R. A. Sunyaev. The evolution of CMB spectral distortions in the early Universe.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 419:1294–1314, January 2012

    2012

  22. [22]

    Chluba and R

    J. Chluba and R. M. Thomas. Towards a complete treatment of the cosmological recombination problem.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 412:748–764, April 2011

    2011

  23. [23]

    Chluba, G

    J. Chluba, G. M. Vasil, and L. J. Dursi. Recombinations to the Rydberg states of hydrogen and their effect during the cosmological recombination epoch.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 407:599–612, September 2010

    2010

  24. [24]

    Green’s function of the cosmological thermalization problem - II

    Jens Chluba. Green’s function of the cosmological thermalization problem - II. Effect of photon injection and constraints.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 454(4):4182–4196, December 2015

    2015

  25. [25]

    Jens Chluba, Bryce Cyr, and Matthew C. Johnson. Revisiting dark photon constraints from CMB spectral distortions.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 535(2):1874–1887, December 2024

    2024

  26. [26]

    Jens Chluba, Bryce Cyr, and Matthew C. Johnson. Revisiting Dark Photon Constraints from CMB Spectral Distortions, September 2024. arXiv:2409.12115 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Analytic approximations for the distortion transfer functions.in prep., August 2026

    Jens Chluba, Sara Evangelista, and Byrce Cyr. Analytic approximations for the distortion transfer functions.in prep., August 2026

    2026

  28. [28]

    Improved frequency hierarchy treatment for anisotropic spectral distortions.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2602.14963, February 2026

    Jens Chluba, Sara Evangelista, Tom Daman, and GeoffVasil. Improved frequency hierarchy treatment for anisotropic spectral distortions.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2602.14963, February 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Spectro-spatial evolution of the CMB

    Jens Chluba, Thomas Kite, and Andrea Ravenni. Spectro-spatial evolution of the CMB. Part I. Discretisation of the thermalisation Green’s function.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2023(11):026, November 2023. – 31 –

    2023

  30. [30]

    Spectro-spatial evolution of the CMB

    Jens Chluba, Andrea Ravenni, and Thomas Kite. Spectro-spatial evolution of the CMB. Part II. Generalised Boltzmann hierarchy.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2023(11):027, November 2023

    2023

  31. [31]

    Cline, Zuowei Liu, and Wei Xue

    James M. Cline, Zuowei Liu, and Wei Xue. Millicharged Atomic Dark Matter.Phys. Rev. D, 85:101302, 2012

    2012

  32. [32]

    Revisiting Constraints on Resonant Axion-Photon Conversions from CMB Spectral Distortions.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2411.13701, November 2024

    Bryce Cyr, Jens Chluba, and Pranav Bharadwaj Gangrekalve Manoj. Revisiting Constraints on Resonant Axion-Photon Conversions from CMB Spectral Distortions.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2411.13701, November 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    The Cosmology of Atomic Dark Matter.Phys

    Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine and Kris Sigurdson. The Cosmology of Atomic Dark Matter.Phys. Rev. D, 87:103515, 2013

    2013

  34. [34]

    Updated bounds on millicharged particles.JHEP, 05:003, 2000

    Sacha Davidson, Steen Hannestad, and Georg Raffelt. Updated bounds on millicharged particles.JHEP, 05:003, 2000

    2000

  35. [35]

    Sacha Davidson and Michael E. Peskin. Astrophysical bounds on millicharged particles in models with a paraphoton.Phys. Rev. D, 49:2114–2117, 1994

    1994

  36. [36]

    The late-time heating Green’s function and improvements to distortion frequency hierarchy treatment.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 539(2):1640–1650, May 2025

    Sara Evangelista, Jens Chluba, and Francesco Pace. The late-time heating Green’s function and improvements to distortion frequency hierarchy treatment.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 539(2):1640–1650, May 2025

    2025

  37. [37]

    Fitzpatrick, Hongwan Liu, Tracy R

    Patrick J. Fitzpatrick, Hongwan Liu, Tracy R. Slatyer, and Yu-Dai Tsai. New Thermal Relic Targets for Inelastic Vector-Portal Dark Matter.Phys. Rev. D, 106(8):083507, 2022

    2022

  38. [38]

    D. J. Fixsen, E. S. Cheng, J. M. Gales, J. C. Mather, R. A. Shafer, and E. L. Wright. The Cosmic Microwave Background Spectrum from the Full COBE FIRAS Data Set.The Astrophysical Journal, 473:576–+, December 1996

    1996

  39. [39]

    Two Z’s or Not Two Z’s?Phys

    Peter Galison and Aneesh Manohar. Two Z’s or Not Two Z’s?Phys. Lett. B, 136:279–283, 1984

    1984

  40. [40]

    Ginsparg, and S

    Howard Georgi, Paul H. Ginsparg, and S. L. Glashow. Photon Oscillations and the Cosmic Background Radiation.Nature, 306:765–766, 1983

    1983

  41. [41]

    Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts.Phys

    Bob Holdom. Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts.Phys. Lett. B, 166:196–198, 1986

    1986

  42. [42]

    No cosmological constraints on dark photon dark matter from resonant conversion: Impact of nonlinear plasma dynamics

    Anson Hook, Junwu Huang, and Mohamad Shalaby. No cosmological constraints on dark photon dark matter from resonant conversion: Impact of nonlinear plasma dynamics. 10 2025

    2025

  43. [43]

    Hu and J

    W. Hu and J. Silk. Thermalization and spectral distortions of the cosmic background radiation.Physical Review D, 48:485–502, July 1993

    1993

  44. [44]

    Hu and M

    W. Hu and M. White. CMB anisotropies: Total angular momentum method.Physical Review D, 56:596–615, July 1997

    1997

  45. [45]

    Kaplan, Gordan Z

    David E. Kaplan, Gordan Z. Krnjaic, Keith R. Rehermann, and Christopher M. Wells. Atomic Dark Matter.JCAP, 05:021, 2010

    2010

  46. [46]

    Khatri and B

    R. Khatri and B. D. Wandelt. Crinkles in the last scattering surface: Non-Gaussianity from inhomogeneous recombination.Physical Review D, 79(2):023501, January 2009

    2009

  47. [47]

    Spectro-spatial evolution of the CMB

    Thomas Kite, Andrea Ravenni, and Jens Chluba. Spectro-spatial evolution of the CMB. Part III. Transfer functions, power spectra and Fisher forecasts.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2023(11):028, November 2023

    2023

  48. [48]

    Kogut, J

    A. Kogut, J. Chluba, D. J. Fixsen, S. Meyer, and D. Spergel. The Primordial Inflation Explorer (PIXIE). InSPIE Conference Series, volume 9904 ofProc.SPIE, page 99040W, July 2016

    2016

  49. [49]

    Kogut, D

    A. Kogut, D. J. Fixsen, D. T. Chuss, J. Dotson, E. Dwek, M. Halpern, G. F. Hinshaw, S. M. Meyer, S. H. Moseley, M. D. Seiffert, D. N. Spergel, and E. J. Wollack. The Primordial Inflation Explorer (PIXIE): a nulling polarimeter for cosmic microwave background observations.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 7:25–+, July 2011. – 32 –

    2011

  50. [50]

    Kogut, Dale Fixsen, Nabila Aghanim, Jens Chluba, David T

    A. Kogut, Dale Fixsen, Nabila Aghanim, Jens Chluba, David T. Chuss, Jacques Delabrouille, Brandon S. Hensley, J. Colin Hill, Bruno Maffei, Anthony R. Pullen, Additya Rotti, Eric R. Switzer, Edward J. Woillack, and Ioana Zelko. Systematic error mitigation for the PIXIE Fourier transform spectrometer.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2023(7):0...

    2023

  51. [51]

    Schlafly, and Martin White

    Alex Krolewski, Simone Ferraro, Edward F. Schlafly, and Martin White. unWISE tomography of Planck CMB lensing.JCAP, 05:047, 2020

    2020

  52. [52]

    The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview

    J. Lesgourgues. The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview. ArXiv:1104.2932, April 2011

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  53. [53]

    Lewis, A

    A. Lewis, A. Challinor, and A. Lasenby. Efficient Computation of Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies in Closed Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Models.The Astrophysical Journal, 538:473–476, August 2000

    2000

  54. [54]

    Jense, Irene Abril-Cabezas, Graeme E

    Thibaut Louis, Adrien La Posta, Zachary Atkins, Hidde T. Jense, Irene Abril-Cabezas, Graeme E. Addison, Peter A. R. Ade, Simone Aiola, Tommy Alford, David Alonso, Mandana Amiri, Rui An, Jason E. Austermann, Eleonora Barbavara, Nicholas Battaglia, Elia Stefano Battistelli, James A. Beall, Rachel Bean, Ali Beheshti, Benjamin Beringue, Tanay Bhandarkar, Emil...

    2025

  55. [55]

    Ma and E

    C.-P. Ma and E. Bertschinger. Cosmological Perturbation Theory in the Synchronous and Conformal Newtonian Gauges.The Astrophysical Journal, 455:7–+, December 1995

    1995

  56. [56]

    Maffei, M

    B. Maffei, M. H. Abitbol, N. Aghanim, J. Aumont, E. Battistelli, J. Chluba, X. Coulon, P. De Bernardis, M. Douspis, J. Grain, S. Gervasoni, J. C. Hill, A. Kogut, S. Masi, T. Matsumura, C. O Sullivan, L. Pagano, G. Pisano, M. Remazeilles, A. Ritacco, A. Rotti, V . Sauvage, G. Savini, S. L. Stever, A. Tartari, L. Thiele, and N. Trappe. BISOU: a balloon proj...

    work page arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    S. Masi, E. Battistelli, P. de Bernardis, A. Coppolecchia, F. Columbro, G. D’Alessandro, M. De Petris, L. Lamagna, E. Marchitelli, L. Mele, A. Paiella, F. Piacentini, G. Pisano, M. Bersanelli, C. Franceschet, E. Manzan, D. Mennella, S. Realini, S. Cibella, F. Martini, G. Pettinari, G. Coppi, M. Gervasi, A. Limonta, M. Zannoni, L. Piccirillo, and C. Tucker...

    work page arXiv 2021

  58. [58]

    J. C. Mather, E. S. Cheng, D. A. Cottingham, R. E. Eplee, Jr., D. J. Fixsen, T. Hewagama, R. B. Isaacman, K. A. Jensen, S. S. Meyer, P. D. Noerdlinger, S. M. Read, and L. P. Rosen. Measurement of the cosmic microwave background spectrum by the COBE FIRAS instrument.The Astrophysical Journal, 420:439–444, January 1994

    1994

  59. [59]

    Colin Hill, Junwu Huang, Matthew C

    Fiona McCarthy, Dalila Pirvu, J. Colin Hill, Junwu Huang, Matthew C. Johnson, and Keir K. Rogers. Dark Photon Limits from Patchy Dark Screening of the Cosmic Microwave Background.Phys. Rev. Lett., 133(14):141003, 2024

    2024

  60. [60]

    McDermott and Samuel J

    Samuel D. McDermott and Samuel J. Witte. Cosmological evolution of light dark photon dark matter. Physical Review D, 101(6):063030, March 2020

    2020

  61. [61]

    Microwave Background Constraints on Mixing of Photons with Hidden Photons.JCAP, 03:026, 2009

    Alessandro Mirizzi, Javier Redondo, and Gunter Sigl. Microwave Background Constraints on Mixing of Photons with Hidden Photons.JCAP, 03:026, 2009

    2009

  62. [62]

    Novosyadlyj

    B. Novosyadlyj. Perturbations of ionization fractions at the cosmological recombination epoch.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 370:1771–1782, August 2006

    2006

  63. [63]

    L. B. Okun. Limits of electrodynamics: paraphotons?Sov. Phys. JETP, 56:502, 1982. [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.83, 892 (1982)]

    1982

  64. [64]

    Dalila Pirvu, Junwu Huang, and Matthew C. Johnson. Patchy screening of the CMB from dark photons. JCAP, 01:019, 2024

    2024

  65. [65]

    Aghanim, Y

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y . Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, R. Battye, K. Benabed, J. P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boulanger, M. Bucher, C. Burigana, R. C. Butler, E. Calabrese, J. F. Cardoso, J. Car...

    2018

  66. [66]

    Remazeilles and J

    M. Remazeilles and J. Chluba. Extracting foreground-obscuredµ-distortion anisotropies to constrain – 34 – primordial non-Gaussianity.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 478(1):807–824, July 2018

    2018

  67. [67]

    Aditya Rotti and Jens Chluba. Combining ILC and moment expansion techniques for extracting average-sky signals and CMB anisotropies.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 500(1):976–985, January 2021

    2021

  68. [68]

    Non-Gaussianity constraints with anisotropicµ distortion measurements from Planck.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 515(4):5847–5868, October 2022

    Aditya Rotti, Andrea Ravenni, and Jens Chluba. Non-Gaussianity constraints with anisotropicµ distortion measurements from Planck.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 515(4):5847–5868, October 2022

    2022

  69. [69]

    Dark Photon mediated Inelastic Dark Matter in Cosmology, Astrophysics and Colliders

    Abhishek Roy, Prasenjit Sanyal, and Stefano Scopel. Dark Photon mediated Inelastic Dark Matter in Cosmology, Astrophysics and Colliders. 2026

    2026

  70. [70]

    Hoyland, Marta Aguiar-González, Javier De Miguel-Hernández, Ricardo T

    José Alberto Rubiño Martín, Paz Alonso Arias, Roger J. Hoyland, Marta Aguiar-González, Javier De Miguel-Hernández, Ricardo T. Génova-Santos, Maria F. Gomez-Reñasco, Federica Guidi, Patricia Fernández-Izquierdo, Mateo Fernández-Torreiro, Pablo A. Fuerte-Rodriguez, Carlos Hernandez-Monteagudo, Carlos H. López-Caraballo, Angeles Perez-de-Taoro, Michael W. Pe...

    2020

  71. [71]

    Colin Hill, and Federico Bianchini

    Alina Sabyr, Giulio Fabbian, J. Colin Hill, and Federico Bianchini. A new constraint on they-distortion with FIRAS: robustness of component separation methods.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2508.04593, August 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Seljak and M

    U. Seljak and M. Zaldarriaga. A Line-of-Sight Integration Approach to Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies.The Astrophysical Journal, 469:437–+, October 1996

    1996

  73. [73]

    A Line-of-Sight Integration Approach to Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies.The Astrophysical Journal, 469:437, October 1996

    Uros Seljak and Matias Zaldarriaga. A Line-of-Sight Integration Approach to Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies.The Astrophysical Journal, 469:437, October 1996

    1996

  74. [74]

    Senatore, S

    L. Senatore, S. Tassev, and M. Zaldarriaga. Non-gaussianities from perturbing recombination.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 9:38, September 2009

    2009

  75. [75]

    R. A. Sunyaev and Y . B. Zeldovich. The interaction of matter and radiation in the hot model of the Universe, II.Astrophysics and Space Science, 7:20–30, April 1970

    1970

  76. [76]

    Inelastic Dark Matter.Phys

    David Tucker-Smith and Neal Weiner. Inelastic Dark Matter.Phys. Rev. D, 64:043502, 2001

    2001

  77. [77]

    Richard Bond, Jens Chluba, Thomas Crawford, Giulio Fabbian, Vera Gluscevic, Daniel Grin, J

    David Zegeye, Federico Bianchini, J. Richard Bond, Jens Chluba, Thomas Crawford, Giulio Fabbian, Vera Gluscevic, Daniel Grin, J. Colin Hill, P. Daniel Meerburg, Giorgio Orlando, Bruce Partridge, Christian L. Reichardt, Mathieu Remazeilles, Douglas Scott, Edward J. Wollack, and CMB-S4 Collaboration. CMB-S4 forecasts for constraints on f NL throughµ-distort...

    2023

  78. [78]

    Square Kilometer Array as a cosmic microwave background experiment.Physical Review D, 111(6):063517, March 2025

    David Zegeye, Thomas Crawford, Jens Chluba, Mathieu Remazeilles, and Keith Grainge. Square Kilometer Array as a cosmic microwave background experiment.Physical Review D, 111(6):063517, March 2025. – 35 – A Relation between the energy release and the conversion parameter We have seen throughout the paper that for simulations, it is often more convenient to...

    2025