pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10700 · v1 · pith:3CVAXPTVnew · submitted 2026-06-09 · 🪐 quant-ph

Certification of Network Quantum Sensing

Matteo Rosati , Gabriele Bizzarri , Marco Barbieri This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 13:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum sensingquantum networksPauli-twirlingquantum cryptographyphase estimationentangled photonsmetrology security
0
0 comments X

The pith

Offline bilateral Pauli-twirling certifies privacy in network quantum sensing while preserving precision.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a protocol for secure quantum remote sensing over networks. It shows that applying offline bilateral Pauli-twirling to the quantum link forces the effective channel into a Bell-diagonal form no matter what attack is used. This allows legitimate users to exactly quantify their estimation error compared to an eavesdropper. The approach requires only public classical communication and maintains the original metrological sensitivity without extra experimental cost. Experiments with entangled photons verify that users achieve better precision than any eavesdropper across many conditions.

Core claim

By employing offline bilateral Pauli-twirling, the protocol forces the effective quantum channel into a Bell-diagonal form independently of the attack. This preserves metrological sensitivity without additional overhead and enables legitimate users to exactly quantify their estimation error relative to an eavesdropper controlling the channels, using only public communication alongside an insecure quantum link.

What carries the argument

offline bilateral Pauli-twirling, which symmetrizes any quantum channel into Bell-diagonal form to certify security while keeping sensing performance intact

If this is right

  • The protocol certifies both privacy and integrity of the quantum estimation.
  • Users can rigorously bound their performance against any eavesdropper.
  • Metrological sensitivity remains unchanged despite the security measures.
  • The method works over noisy insecure networks with only public classical messages.
  • Experimental demonstrations confirm user precision exceeds eavesdropper capabilities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach could be adapted to other quantum network tasks that combine sensing with communication.
  • Future networks might use this to enable secure distributed gravimetry or biological monitoring.
  • Testing the protocol in larger multi-node setups would check scalability of the twirling step.
  • The Bell-diagonal reduction might simplify error analysis in related quantum information protocols.

Load-bearing premise

That performing offline bilateral Pauli-twirling on the quantum link always produces a Bell-diagonal effective channel for any attack, leaves metrological sensitivity unchanged, and needs only public classical communication.

What would settle it

An experiment or calculation where, after applying the twirling, the users cannot exactly quantify their estimation error relative to the eavesdropper or the sensitivity is reduced under some channel attack.

read the original abstract

The distribution of quantum sensors on quantum networks is a key enabler of quantum technologies in interferometry, gravimetry, timekeeping, biological monitoring, and beyond. Yet, guaranteeing the security of these distributed sensors over noisy, insecure networks remains a formidable challenge. Previous efforts to combine quantum metrology and cryptography have encountered an apparently unavoidable tension, proposing bounds for security which are only loosely tied to the achievable measurement performance. Here we introduce a quantum remote sensing protocol that can rigorously certify privacy and integrity of the estimation. By employing offline bilateral Pauli-twirling, our approach forces the effective quantum channel into a Bell-diagonal form, independently of the attack. Surprisingly, this also preserves metrological sensitivity without introducing additional experimental overhead. Relying solely on public communication alongside an insecure quantum link, the protocol enables legitimate users to exactly quantify their estimation error relative to an eavesdropper controlling the channels. We experimentally demonstrate this framework by estimating an optical phase using entangled photons, observing that the users' precision consistently surpasses the eavesdropper's capabilities across a broad parameter regime. By unifying quantum cryptography and metrology, our results provide a practical pathway to achieve simultaneous quantum-limited precision and rigorous information security in real-world quantum networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a quantum remote sensing protocol that employs offline bilateral Pauli-twirling to force the effective quantum channel into a Bell-diagonal form independently of any attack. It claims this preserves metrological sensitivity without additional experimental overhead, enables exact quantification of the legitimate users' estimation error relative to an eavesdropper controlling the channels, and unifies quantum metrology with cryptography. An experimental demonstration is reported in which an optical phase is estimated using entangled photons, with users' precision consistently exceeding the eavesdropper's across a broad parameter regime.

Significance. If the invariance of quantum Fisher information under bilateral Pauli-twirling holds exactly for arbitrary adversarial channels, the work would provide a practical route to simultaneous quantum-limited precision and rigorous information security in distributed quantum sensing networks, addressing a key tension between metrology and cryptography.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / protocol description] The central claim that offline bilateral Pauli-twirling maps any (including fully adversarial) channel to Bell-diagonal form while leaving the quantum Fisher information for the sensed parameter unchanged is load-bearing for the exact error quantification relative to the eavesdropper. No derivation, proof, or explicit calculation of this invariance is visible in the provided text, and the non-obvious preservation for distributed phase estimation must be shown to hold exactly rather than approximately.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract asserts an experimental demonstration with exact quantification of error but supplies no data, error bars, channel models, or figures; these must be included with quantitative results in the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and for identifying the need for an explicit derivation of the key invariance property. We address the major comment below and have incorporated the requested proof into the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / protocol description] The central claim that offline bilateral Pauli-twirling maps any (including fully adversarial) channel to Bell-diagonal form while leaving the quantum Fisher information for the sensed parameter unchanged is load-bearing for the exact error quantification relative to the eavesdropper. No derivation, proof, or explicit calculation of this invariance is visible in the provided text, and the non-obvious preservation for distributed phase estimation must be shown to hold exactly rather than approximately.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation is essential for rigor. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (III.B) containing a complete proof. The argument proceeds in two steps. First, bilateral Pauli-twirling is a completely positive trace-preserving map that is a convex combination of local Pauli unitaries applied to both arms; because every Pauli operator commutes with the global phase-encoding unitary exp(-i heta Z⊗I) up to a global phase that factors out of the density operator, the twirled channel remains Bell-diagonal for any input state and any adversarial channel. Second, the quantum Fisher information is invariant because the symmetric logarithmic derivative for the phase parameter is unchanged under the twirling (the relevant commutator [H,·] is preserved by the unitary conjugations). The proof is exact, not approximate, and holds for arbitrary distributed phase estimation with the same entangled resource state. We have also included a short numerical verification for the experimental parameters. These additions directly support the exact error quantification relative to the eavesdropper. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: protocol claims rely on standard properties of Pauli twirling without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper's central protocol uses offline bilateral Pauli-twirling to map channels to Bell-diagonal form independently of attack while preserving metrological sensitivity. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are exhibited in the abstract or described derivation that reduce the preservation claim to a definition, a renamed fit, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. The twirling step is presented as a standard operation whose effect on quantum Fisher information is asserted to hold exactly, but without internal circular construction visible from the text. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external quantum information benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; full manuscript would be required to audit them.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5736 in / 1165 out tokens · 26186 ms · 2026-06-27T13:05:46.524056+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Nature453(7198), 1023–1030 (2008) https: //doi.org/10.1038/nature07127

    Kimble, H.J.: The quantum internet. Nature453(7198), 1023–1030 (2008) https: //doi.org/10.1038/nature07127

    work page doi:10.1038/nature07127 2008

  2. [2]

    Zhang, J., Wang, L., Hai, Y.-J., Zhang, J., Chu, J., Jiang, J., Huang, W., Liang, Y., Qiu, J., Sun, X., Tao, Z., Zhang, L., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y., Guo, W., Linpeng, X., Liu, S., Ren, W., Zhong, Y., Niu, J., Yuan, H., Yu, D.: Distributed multi- parameter quantum metrology with a superconducting quantum network. Nat. Commun.17(1), 1825 (2026) https://doi.org/1...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-026-68535-9 2026

  3. [3]

    Ge, W., Jacobs, K.: Heisenberg-Limited Continuous-Variable Distributed Quan- tum Metrology with Arbitrary Weights. Phys. Rev. Lett.135(10), 100801 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/jkjj-3gvb

    work page doi:10.1103/jkjj-3gvb 2025

  4. [4]

    Kim, D.-H., Hong, S., Kim, Y.-S., Kim, Y., Lee, S.-W., Pooser, R.C., Oh, K., Lee, S.-Y., Lee, C., Lim, H.-T.: Distributed quantum sensing of multiple phases with fewer photons. Nat. Commun.15(1), 266 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-023-44204-z

    2024

  5. [5]

    Optica11(12), 1762 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.537655 17

    Liu, S., Tian, Y., Zhang, Y., Lu, Z., Wang, X., Li, Y.: Integrated quantum com- munication network and vibration sensing in optical fibers. Optica11(12), 1762 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.537655 17

    work page doi:10.1364/optica.537655 2024

  6. [6]

    Liu, Y.-C., Cheng, Y.-B., Pan, X.-B., Sun, Z.-Z., Pan, D., Long, G.-L.: Quantum integrated sensing and communication via entanglement. Phys. Rev. Appl.22(3), 034051 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.034051

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.22.034051 2024

  7. [7]

    Dalvit, D.A.R., Volkoff, T.J., Choi, Y.-S., Azad, A.K., Chen, H.-T., Milonni, P.W.: Quantum Frequency Combs with Path Identity for Quantum Remote Sens- ing. Phys. Rev. X14(4), 041058 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.14. 041058

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.14 2024

  8. [8]

    Nature612(7941), 661–665 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05363-z

    Malia, B.K., Wu, Y., Mart´ ınez-Rinc´ on, J., Kasevich, M.A.: Distributed quan- tum sensing with mode-entangled spin-squeezed atomic states. Nature612(7941), 661–665 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05363-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05363-z 2022

  9. [9]

    Zhao, S.-R., Zhang, Y.-Z., Liu, W.-Z., Guan, J.-Y., Zhang, W., Li, C.-L., Bai, B., Li, M.-H., Liu, Y., You, L., Zhang, J., Fan, J., Xu, F., Zhang, Q., Pan, J.-W.: Field Demonstration of Distributed Quantum Sensing without Post-Selection. Phys. Rev. X11(3), 031009 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.031009

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.031009 2021

  10. [10]

    Guo, X., Breum, C.R., Borregaard, J., Izumi, S., Larsen, M.V., Gehring, T., Christandl, M., Neergaard-Nielsen, J.S., Andersen, U.L.: Distributed quantum sensing in a continuous-variable entangled network. Nat. Phys.16(3), 281–284 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0743-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0743-x 2020

  11. [11]

    Gessner, M., Smerzi, A., Pezz` e, L.: Multiparameter squeezing for optimal quan- tum enhancements in sensor networks. Nat. Commun.11(1), 3817 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17471-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17471-3 2020

  12. [12]

    Proctor, T.J., Knott, P.A., Dunningham, J.A.: Multiparameter Estimation in Networked Quantum Sensors. Phys. Rev. Lett.120(8), 080501 (2018) https:// doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.080501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.080501 2018

  13. [13]

    Hassani, M., Scheiner, S., Paris, M.G.A., Markham, D.: Privacy in Networks of Quantum Sensors. Phys. Rev. Lett.134(3), 030802 (2025) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.134.030802 arXiv:2408.01711

    arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    npj Quantum Inf

    Alushi, U., Di Candia, R.: Privacy in distributed quantum sensing with Gaus- sian quantum networks. npj Quantum Inf. (2026) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41534-026-01266-3 arXiv:2509.22103

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    Quantum8, 1433 (2024) https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-08-08-1433 arXiv:2209.03075

    Rosati, M.: A learning theory for quantum photonic processors and beyond. Quantum8, 1433 (2024) https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-08-08-1433 arXiv:2209.03075

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2024-08-08-1433 2024

  16. [16]

    In: 2021 IEEE Int

    Rosati, M.: Performance of Coherent Frequency-Shift Keying for Classical Com- munication on Quantum Channels. In: 2021 IEEE Int. Symp. Inf. Theory, pp. 902–905. IEEE, ??? (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIT45174.2021.9517959 . https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9517959/ 18

    work page doi:10.1109/isit45174.2021.9517959 2021

  17. [17]

    Barz, S., Fitzsimons, J.F., Kashefi, E., Walther, P.: Experimental verification of quantum computation. Nat. Phys.9(11), 727–731 (2013) https://doi.org/10. 1038/nphys2763

    2013

  18. [18]

    Polacchi, B., Leichtle, D., Limongi, L., Carvacho, G., Milani, G., Spagnolo, N., Kaplan, M., Sciarrino, F., Kashefi, E.: Multi-client distributed blind quantum computation with the Qline architecture. Nat. Commun.14(1), 7743 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43617-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43617-0 2023

  19. [19]

    Science (80-

    Wei, Y.-C., Stas, P.-J., Suleymanzade, A., Baranes, G., Machado, F., Huan, Y.Q., Knaut, C.M., Ding, S.W., Merz, M., Knall, E.N., Yazlar, U., Sirotin, M., Wang, I.W., Machielse, B., Yelin, S.F., Borregaard, J., Park, H., Lonˇ car, M., Lukin, M.D.: Universal distributed blind quantum computing with solid- state qubits. Science (80-. ).388(6746), 509–513 (20...

    2025

  20. [20]

    IEEE Commun

    Dong, Y., Liu, F., Xiong, Y.: Joint Receiver Design for Integrated Sensing and Communications. IEEE Commun. Lett.27(7), 1854–1858 (2023) https://doi.org/ 10.1109/LCOMM.2023.3274295 arXiv:2211.05535

    work page doi:10.1109/lcomm.2023.3274295 2023

  21. [21]

    Chen, X.Q., Zhang, L., Zheng, Y.N., Liu, S., Huang, Z.R., Liang, J.C., Di Renzo, M., Galdi, V., Cui, T.J.: Integrated sensing and communication based on space- time-coding metasurfaces. Nat. Commun.16(1), 1836 (2025) https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41467-025-57137-6

    2025

  22. [22]

    Tao, Y., Feng, H., Fang, Y., Xie, X., Zeng, Y., Wu, Y., Ge, T., Zhang, Y., Chen, Z., Tao, Z., Xu, J., Shu, H., Wang, X., Yu, X., Wang, C.: Integrated photonic ultra- wideband real-time spectrum sensing for 6G wireless networks. Nat. Commun. 17(1), 3666 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70389-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-026-70389-0 2026

  23. [23]

    Nature651(8105), 326– 332 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10171-w

    Stas, P.-J., Wei, Y.-C., Sirotin, M., Huan, Y.Q., Yazlar, U., Abdo Arias, F., Knyazev, E., Baranes, G., Machielse, B., Grandi, S., Riedel, D., Borregaard, J., Park, H., Lonˇ car, M., Suleymanzade, A., Lukin, M.D.: Entanglement-assisted non-local optical interferometry in a quantum network. Nature651(8105), 326– 332 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-02...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10171-w 2026

  24. [24]

    Nature643(8073), 955–960 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-025-09224-3

    Novikov, V., Jia, J., Brasil, T.B., Grimaldi, A., Bocoum, M., Balabas, M., M¨ uller, J.H., Zeuthen, E., Polzik, E.S.: Hybrid quantum network for sensing in the acous- tic frequency range. Nature643(8073), 955–960 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-025-09224-3

    2025

  25. [25]

    Crawford, S.E., Lander, G.R., Paudel, H.P., Slot, M.R., Lalam, N., Wuenschell, J., Pingree, R., Oueid, R., Wright, R., Buric, M., Brister, M.M., Duan, Y.: Quantum sensing for emerging energy technologies. Nat. Rev. Clean Technol.1(12), 861–876 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s44359-025-00112-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s44359-025-00112-7 2025

  26. [26]

    Aslam, N., Zhou, H., Urbach, E.K., Turner, M.J., Walsworth, R.L., Lukin, M.D., 19 Park, H.: Quantum sensors for biomedical applications. Nat. Rev. Phys.5(3), 157–169 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00558-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00558-3 2023

  27. [27]

    Nature602(7898), 590–594 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-021-04315-3

    Stray, B., Lamb, A., Kaushik, A., Vovrosh, J., Rodgers, A., Winch, J., Hayati, F., Boddice, D., Stabrawa, A., Niggebaum, A., Langlois, M., Lien, Y.-H., Lellouch, S., Roshanmanesh, S., Ridley, K., Villiers, G., Brown, G., Cross, T., Tuckwell, G., Faramarzi, A., Metje, N., Bongs, K., Holynski, M.: Quantum sensing for gravity cartography. Nature602(7898), 59...

    2022

  28. [28]

    K´ om´ ar, P., Kessler, E.M., Bishof, M., Jiang, L., Sørensen, A.S., Ye, J., Lukin, M.D.: A quantum network of clocks. Nat. Phys.10(8), 582–587 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1038/nphys3000 arXiv:1310.6045

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/nphys3000 2014

  29. [29]

    Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., Maccone, L.: Advances in quantum metrology. Nat. Photonics5(4), 222–229 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2011.35

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.35 2011

  30. [30]

    Pirandola, S., Bardhan, B.R., Gehring, T., Weedbrook, C., Lloyd, S.: Advances in photonic quantum sensing. Nat. Photonics12(12), 724–733 (2018) https://doi. org/10.1038/s41566-018-0301-6 arXiv:1811.01969

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/s41566-018-0301-6 2018

  31. [31]

    Nature603(7902), 604–609 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04435-4

    Marciniak, C.D., Feldker, T., Pogorelov, I., Kaubruegger, R., Vasilyev, D.V., Bijnen, R., Schindler, P., Zoller, P., Blatt, R., Monz, T.: Optimal metrology with programmable quantum sensors. Nature603(7902), 604–609 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04435-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04435-4 2022

  32. [32]

    Portmann, C., Renner, R.: Security in quantum cryptography. Rev. Mod. Phys. 94(2), 025008 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.94.025008

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.025008 2022

  33. [33]

    Pirandola, S., Andersen, U.L., Banchi, L., Berta, M., Bunandar, D., Colbeck, R., Englund, D., Gehring, T., Lupo, C., Ottaviani, C., Pereira, J.L., Razavi, M., Shamsul Shaari, J., Tomamichel, M., Usenko, V.C., Vallone, G., Villoresi, P., Wallden, P.: Advances in quantum cryptography. Adv. Opt. Photonics12(4), 1012 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.361502 ...

    work page doi:10.1364/aop.361502 2020

  34. [34]

    Renner, R.: Symmetry of large physical systems implies independence of sub- systems. Nat. Phys.3(9), 645–649 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys684 arXiv:0703069 [quant-ph]

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys684 2007

  35. [35]

    Nature582(7813), 501–505 (2020) https://doi.org/10

    Yin, J., Li, Y.-H., Liao, S.-K., Yang, M., Cao, Y., Zhang, L., Ren, J.-G., Cai, W.-Q., Liu, W.-Y., Li, S.-L., Shu, R., Huang, Y.-M., Deng, L., Li, L., Zhang, Q., Liu, N.-L., Chen, Y.-A., Lu, C.-Y., Wang, X.-B., Xu, F., Wang, J.-Y., Peng, C.-Z., Ekert, A.K., Pan, J.-W.: Entanglement-based secure quantum cryptogra- phy over 1,120 kilometres. Nature582(7813)...

    2020

  36. [36]

    Para¨ ıso, T.K., Roger, T., Marangon, D.G., De Marco, I., Sanzaro, M., Woodward, 20 R.I., Dynes, J.F., Yuan, Z., Shields, A.J.: A photonic integrated quantum secure communication system. Nat. Photonics15(11), 850–856 (2021) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41566-021-00873-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-021-00873-0 2021

  37. [37]

    Nature607(7920), 682–686 (2022) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41586-022-04941-5

    Nadlinger, D.P., Drmota, P., Nichol, B.C., Araneda, G., Main, D., Srinivas, R., Lucas, D.M., Ballance, C.J., Ivanov, K., Tan, E.Y.-Z., Sekatski, P., Urbanke, R.L., Renner, R., Sangouard, N., Bancal, J.-D.: Experimental quantum key distribution certified by Bell’s theorem. Nature607(7920), 682–686 (2022) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41586-022-04941-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04941-5 2022

  38. [38]

    Kianvash, F., Barbieri, M., Rosati, M.: Private Remote Phase Estimation over a Lossy Quantum Channel. Phys. Rev. Lett.136(6), 060805 (2026) https://doi. org/10.1103/rhgw-t21z arXiv:2511.09123

    work page doi:10.1103/rhgw-t21z 2026

  39. [39]

    AVS Quantum Sci.5(1) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1116/5.0137260 arXiv:2302.03617

    Moore, S.W., Dunningham, J.A.: Secure quantum remote sensing without entanglement. AVS Quantum Sci.5(1) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1116/5.0137260 arXiv:2302.03617

    work page doi:10.1116/5.0137260 2023

  40. [40]

    npj Quantum Inf.12(1), 33 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41534-025-01180-0 arXiv:2505.02620

    Bizzarri, G., Barbieri, M., Manrique, M., Parisi, M., Bruni, F., Gianani, I., Rosati, M.: Faithful and secure distributed quantum sensing under general- coherent attacks. npj Quantum Inf.12(1), 33 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41534-025-01180-0 arXiv:2505.02620

    arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    Moore, S.W., Dunningham, J.A.: Secure quantum-enhanced measurements on a network of sensors. Phys. Rev. A111(1), 012616 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.111.012616

    2025

  42. [42]

    Ho, J., Webb, J.W., Brooks, R.M.J., Grasselli, F., Gauger, E., Fedrizzi, A.: Quantum-private distributed sensing (2025) arXiv:2410.00970

    arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Huang, Z., Macchiavello, C., Maccone, L.: Cryptographic quantum metrol- ogy. Phys. Rev. A99(2), 022314 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99. 022314

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.99 2019

  44. [44]

    Yin, P., Takeuchi, Y., Zhang, W.-H., Yin, Z.-Q., Matsuzaki, Y., Peng, X.-X., Xu, X.-Y., Xu, J.-S., Tang, J.-S., Zhou, Z.-Q., Chen, G., Li, C.-F., Guo, G.- C.: Experimental demonstration of secure quantum remote sensing (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.014065 arXiv:1907.06480

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.14.014065 2019

  45. [45]

    Shettell, N., Kashefi, E., Markham, D.: Cryptographic approach to quan- tum metrology. Phys. Rev. A105(1), 010401 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.105.L010401

    2022

  46. [46]

    Shor, P.W., Preskill, J.: Simple Proof of Security of the BB84 Quantum Key Distribution Protocol. Phys. Rev. Lett.85(2), 441–444 (2000) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.441 arXiv:0003004 [quant-ph] 21

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.441 2000

  47. [47]

    Kraus, B., Gisin, N., Renner, R.: Lower and Upper Bounds on the Secret- Key Rate for Quantum Key Distribution Protocols Using One-Way Classical Communication. Phys. Rev. Lett.95(8), 080501 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.95.080501 arXiv:0410215 [quant-ph]

    2005

  48. [48]

    Helstrom, C.W.: Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory vol. 84, p. 309. Academic press, New York (1976)

    1976

  49. [49]

    Langford, N.K., Weinhold, T.J., Prevedel, R., Resch, K.J., Gilchrist, A., O’Brien, J.L., Pryde, G.J., White, A.G.: Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis. Phys. Rev. Lett.95(21), 210504 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.210504

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.210504 2005

  50. [50]

    Mukhopadhyay, C., Bayat, A., Montenegro, V., Paris, M.G.A.: Beating joint quantum estimation limits with stepwise multiparameter metrology (2025) arXiv:2506.06075 22

    arXiv 2025