Noise cancellation by superposition of channels and superactivation of quantum capacity: Experimental realization by NMR

Arijit Chatterjee; Deepika Bhargava; T. S. Mahesh; Vishal Varma

arxiv: 2606.10744 · v1 · pith:OBZENLS4new · submitted 2026-06-09 · 🪐 quant-ph

Noise cancellation by superposition of channels and superactivation of quantum capacity: Experimental realization by NMR

Deepika Bhargava , Arijit Chatterjee , Vishal Varma , T. S. Mahesh This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 12:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords quantum channelsnoise cancellationStinespring dilationsuperactivationquantum capacitydephasing channeldepolarizing channelNMR experiment

0 comments

The pith

Superposing Stinespring unitaries of two zero-capacity depolarizing channels produces a channel with positive quantum capacity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that superposing the Stinespring dilations of two noisy channels can cancel their noise through destructive interference, recovering coherence from dephasing channels and activating quantum capacity from two depolarizing channels that individually have zero capacity. It derives conditions for the superposition to remain a valid quantum channel and demonstrates the effect experimentally on NMR registers. A sympathetic reader would care because this provides a coherent-control method to mitigate channel noise without extra qubits or encoding overhead. The three-qubit experiment cancels dephasing while the five-qubit experiment shows both cancellation of depolarization and the resulting positive capacity.

Core claim

Superposition of the Stinespring unitaries belonging to two zero-capacity depolarizing channels yields a channel with positive quantum capacity; the same construction cancels two dephasing channels by destructive interference, restoring coherence. The paper first states the algebraic conditions under which such a superposition defines a valid channel and then implements both cases on NMR hardware.

What carries the argument

Superposition of Stinespring dilation unitaries, which produces interference between the noise operators of the two channels.

If this is right

Two individually useless depolarizing channels can be combined to transmit quantum information.
Dephasing noise can be cancelled by destructive interference of their Stinespring unitaries.
The superposition operation must satisfy explicit algebraic conditions to remain a valid quantum channel.
The effect is realizable on small NMR registers without additional encoding.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The technique may generalize to other noise models if their Stinespring representations allow similar interference.
Channel superposition could complement existing error-correction schemes by reducing the effective noise before correction.
Testing the same superposition on photonic or ion-trap hardware would check whether the NMR implementation introduces platform-specific artifacts.

Load-bearing premise

The NMR experiments accurately implement the theoretical superposition of Stinespring unitaries without introducing uncontrolled errors that would mask the cancellation or superactivation effects.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the output state after the superposed depolarizing channels still has zero coherent information or that coherence is not recovered after the superposed dephasing channels would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10744 by Arijit Chatterjee, Deepika Bhargava, T. S. Mahesh, Vishal Varma.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: (a) Realizing superposition of channels on system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: NMR realization of superposition of two dephasing channels. (a) Pulse sequence implementing control unitaries [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Experimental realization of superposition of two depolar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Noisy quantum channels degrade quantum resources such as coherence and entanglement and hence pose challenges for realizing quantum technologies. Coherent control of noisy channels allows us to minimize their effects on the quantum system. Here we achieve the cancellation of two noisy quantum channels by superposing their corresponding Stinespring dilation unitaries. We first arrive at conditions under which superposition of channels results in a valid quantum channel. We then consider superposing two dephasing channels and observe their destructive interference, thereby effectively recovering the quantum coherence. On superposing two zero-capacity depolarizing channels, we show superactivation of quantum capacity. We experimentally realize the cancellation of two dephasing channels using a three-qubit NMR register. Furthermore, using a five-qubit NMR register, we realize the cancellation of two depolarization channels and demonstrate superactivation of quantum capacity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

NMR experiment demonstrates channel superposition for dephasing cancellation and depolarizing capacity superactivation, but fidelity to the ideal maps remains the key unaddressed detail.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this paper reports NMR experiments realizing noise cancellation by superposing Stinespring unitaries of two dephasing channels on a three-qubit register and superactivation of quantum capacity by superposing two zero-capacity depolarizing channels on a five-qubit register.

They first derive conditions under which the superposition of two channels yields another valid quantum channel. The experiments then implement the controlled superposition using an ancillary qubit to select between the two maps, producing the predicted destructive interference for dephasing and the capacity activation for depolarization.

This is new as a concrete hardware demonstration on NMR. The theoretical idea of channel superposition for superactivation existed in the literature they cite, but putting it on a controllable multi-qubit system with explicit pulse sequences is the step they take.

The work is straightforward in its approach and connects the math to the hardware without obvious overclaims. NMR is a reasonable platform for testing coherent control of this kind because the internal Hamiltonian can be engineered to approximate the required unitaries.

The soft spot is exactly the one raised in the stress-test note. Liquid-state NMR sequences are vulnerable to relaxation, pulse imperfections, and residual couplings that add extra noise. Without reported process tomography or diamond-norm distances showing how close the realized effective channel comes to the ideal superposed map, it is hard to know whether the observed coherence recovery and capacity estimates survive after subtracting those errors. The abstract gives no such numbers, so the central claims rest on the assumption that the implementation is faithful enough.

This paper is for experimental quantum information groups working on channel capacities or noise mitigation techniques. A reader already thinking about coherent control or superactivation would get practical value from the register sizes and the way they set up the superpositions.

It deserves peer review. The experimental claims are specific enough that referees can check the data and methods directly, even if revisions will likely be needed for stronger error characterization.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper derives conditions under which the superposition of two quantum channels yields a valid quantum channel. It then shows theoretically that superposing two dephasing channels produces destructive interference that recovers coherence, and that superposing two zero-capacity depolarizing channels activates positive quantum capacity. These effects are experimentally realized on a three-qubit NMR register (dephasing cancellation) and a five-qubit NMR register (depolarization cancellation plus capacity superactivation).

Significance. If the NMR implementations faithfully reproduce the ideal Stinespring superpositions, the work supplies the first experimental demonstration of both channel-superposition noise cancellation and superactivation of quantum capacity. This would strengthen the experimental footing of a theoretically known but previously unrealized phenomenon and supply a concrete testbed for coherent control of noisy maps.

major comments (1)

[Experimental sections] Experimental sections: the manuscript reports coherence recovery and capacity activation but does not provide process-tomography fidelity or diamond-norm distance between the measured effective channel and the ideal superposed channel. Without this metric it is impossible to confirm that the observed effects survive subtraction of residual decoherence and pulse errors inherent to the liquid-state NMR implementation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of the work's significance and for the detailed comment on the experimental sections. We respond point-by-point below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Experimental sections: the manuscript reports coherence recovery and capacity activation but does not provide process-tomography fidelity or diamond-norm distance between the measured effective channel and the ideal superposed channel. Without this metric it is impossible to confirm that the observed effects survive subtraction of residual decoherence and pulse errors inherent to the liquid-state NMR implementation.

Authors: We agree that process-tomography fidelity and diamond-norm distance to the target superposed channel constitute stronger quantitative evidence. In the revised manuscript we will add these metrics for the three-qubit dephasing experiment, where full process tomography is experimentally tractable. For the five-qubit depolarization experiment we will include the best attainable fidelity estimates together with a rigorous error budget that bounds the deviation from the ideal superposed map; full 5-qubit process tomography remains beyond the resources of the current liquid-state NMR setup. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation and experiment are independent of self-referential fitting or self-citation chains.

full rationale

The paper derives conditions for valid superposed channels from standard quantum channel theory, then applies them to dephasing and depolarizing cases before reporting NMR realizations. No step reduces a claimed prediction or capacity value to a fitted parameter by the paper's own equations, nor does any load-bearing premise rest solely on self-citation. The experimental sections rely on external NMR measurements rather than internal consistency checks that would force the result. This is the common case of a self-contained theoretical-plus-experimental manuscript.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard quantum channel theory (Stinespring dilation, quantum capacity definitions) and the assumption that the NMR Hamiltonian implements the required unitary superpositions. No free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

standard math Stinespring dilation exists for every quantum channel and can be superposed to yield another valid channel under stated conditions.
Invoked in the derivation of superposition conditions (abstract).
domain assumption Depolarizing channels with zero quantum capacity remain zero-capacity when considered individually.
Used to frame the superactivation result.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5682 in / 1230 out tokens · 17612 ms · 2026-06-27T12:58:45.377299+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

[1]

D. K. L. Oi, Interference of quantum channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 067902 (2003)

2003
[2]

S. S. Roy, A. Shukla, and T. Mahesh, Nmr implementa- tion of a quantum delayed-choice experiment, Physical Re- view A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics85, 022109 (2012)

2012
[3]

Chatterjee, H

A. Chatterjee, H. S. Karthik, T. S. Mahesh, and A. R. Usha Devi, Extreme violations of leggett-garg inequalities for a system evolving under superposition of unitaries, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 220202 (2025)

2025
[4]

Oreshkov, F

O. Oreshkov, F. Costa, and ˇC. Brukner, Quantum correlations with no causal order, Nature Communications3, 1092 (2012)

2012
[5]

Hardy, Towards quantum gravity: a framework for prob- abilistic theories with non-fixed causal structure, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical40, 3081 (2007)

L. Hardy, Towards quantum gravity: a framework for prob- abilistic theories with non-fixed causal structure, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical40, 3081 (2007)

2007
[6]

W. C. Myrvold and J. Christian, eds.,Quantum Reality, Rela- tivistic Causality, and Closing the Epistemic Circle(Springer, 2009)

2009
[7]

Chiribella, G

G. Chiribella, G. M. D’Ariano, P. Perinotti, and B. Valiron, Quantum computations without definite causal structure, Phys. Rev. A88, 022318 (2013)

2013
[8]

P. A. Gu´erin, A. Feix, M. Ara´ujo, and i. c. v. Brukner, Exponen- tial communication complexity advantage from quantum super- position of the direction of communication, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 100502 (2016)

2016
[10]

Chen, Y .-X

L. Chen, Y .-X. Yang, G.-C. Li, X.-S. Hong, S.-Q. Zhang, H.-Q. Xu, Y .-C. Liu, G. Chiribella, G. Chen, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Nonlinear enhancement of measurement precision via a hybrid quantum switch (2025), arXiv:2506.20632 [quant-ph]

arXiv 2025
[11]

Yuan, C.-G

Y .-x. Yuan, C.-G. Song, and Q.-y. Cai, Enhanced quantum metrology with entangled quantum switch and probe state, Physica Scripta100, 075108 (2025)

2025
[12]

X. Zhao, Y . Yang, and G. Chiribella, Quantum metrology with indefinite causal order, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 190503 (2020)

2020
[13]

L. M. Procopio, A. Moqanaki, M. Ara ´ujo, F. Costa, I. Alonso Calafell, E. G. Dowd, D. R. Hamel, L. A. Rozema, ˇC. Brukner, and P. Walther, Experimental superposition of or- ders of quantum gates, Nature Communications6, 7913 (2015)

2015
[14]

Goswami, C

K. Goswami, C. Giarmatzi, M. Kewming, F. Costa, C. Bran- ciard, J. Romero, and A. G. White, Indefinite causal order in a quantum switch, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 090503 (2018)

2018
[15]

Rubino, L

G. Rubino, L. A. Rozema, A. Feix, M. Ara ´ujo, J. M. Zeuner, L. M. Procopio, ˇCaslav Brukner, and P. Walther, Experimental verification of an indefinite causal order, Science Advances3, e1602589 (2017), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.1602589

work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.1602589 2017
[16]

Chiribella and H

G. Chiribella and H. Kristj ´ansson, Quantum shannon theory with superpositions of trajectories, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 475, 20180903 (2019)

2019
[17]

Lai, J.-D

P.-R. Lai, J.-D. Lin, Y .-T. Huang, H.-C. Jan, and Y .-N. Chen, Quick charging of a quantum battery with superposed trajecto- ries, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023136 (2024)

2024
[18]

Kumar, R

A. Kumar, R. Christy Rani Grace, and P. Madhu, Cross- correlations in nmr, Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy37, 191 (2000)

2000
[19]

Salhov, Q

A. Salhov, Q. Cao, J. Cai, A. Retzker, F. Jelezko, and G. Genov, Protecting quantum information via destructive interference of correlated noise, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 223601 (2024)

2024
[20]

Salzmann, K

M. Salzmann, K. Pervushin, G. Wider, H. Senn, and K. W ¨uthrich, Trosy in triple-resonance experiments: new per- spectives for sequential nmr assignment of large proteins, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences95, 13585 (1998)

1998
[21]

A. A. Abbott, J. Wechs, D. Horsman, M. Mhalla, and C. Bran- ciard, Communication through coherent control of quantum channels, Quantum4, 333 (2020)

2020
[22]

Chiribella, M

G. Chiribella, M. Banik, S. S. Bhattacharya, T. Guha, M. Al- imuddin, A. Roy, S. Saha, S. Agrawal, and G. Kar, Indefinite causal order enables perfect quantum communication with zero capacity channels, New Journal of Physics23, 033039 (2021)

2021
[23]

Saha and U

S. Saha and U. Sen, Interference between lossy quantum evolu- tions activates information backflow (2025), arXiv:2507.22150 [quant-ph]

arXiv 2025
[24]

Nathanson and M

M. Nathanson and M. B. Ruskai, Pauli diagonal channels con- stant on axes, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoret- ical40, 8171 (2007)

2007
[25]

Siudzi ´nska, Geometry of pauli maps and pauli channels, Phys

K. Siudzi ´nska, Geometry of pauli maps and pauli channels, Phys. Rev. A100, 062331 (2019)

2019
[26]

M. R. Geller and Z. Zhou, Efficient error models for fault- tolerant architectures and the pauli twirling approximation, 9 Phys. Rev. A88, 012314 (2013)

2013
[27]

Horodecki, P

M. Horodecki, P. W. Shor, and M. B. Ruskai, Entanglement breaking channels, Reviews in Mathematical Physics15, 629 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129055X03001709

work page doi:10.1142/s0129055x03001709 2003
[28]

M. B. Ruskai, Qubit entanglement breaking chan- nels, Reviews in Mathematical Physics15, 643 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129055X03001710

work page doi:10.1142/s0129055x03001710 2003
[29]

X. Yuan, Y . Liu, Q. Zhao, B. Regula, J. Thompson, and M. Gu, Universal and operational benchmarking of quantum memories, npj Quantum Information7, 108 (2021)

2021
[30]

Rosset, F

D. Rosset, F. Buscemi, and Y .-C. Liang, Resource theory of quantum memories and their faithful verification with minimal assumptions, Phys. Rev. X8, 021033 (2018)

2018
[31]

L. B. Vieira, H.-Y . Ku, and C. Budroni, Entanglement- breaking channels are a quantum memory resource (2024), arXiv:2402.16789 [quant-ph]

arXiv 2024
[32]

S. Hao, H. Shi, W. Li, J. H. Shapiro, Q. Zhuang, and Z. Zhang, Entanglement-assisted communication surpassing the ultimate classical capacity, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 250501 (2021)

2021
[33]

Pereg, Communication over entanglement-breaking chan- nels with unreliable entanglement assistance, Phys

U. Pereg, Communication over entanglement-breaking chan- nels with unreliable entanglement assistance, Phys. Rev. A108, 042616 (2023)

2023
[34]

M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

2010
[35]

W. F. Stinespring, Positive functions on c*-algebras, Proceed- ings of the American Mathematical Society6, 211–216 (1955)

1955
[36]

Xie, Hyb error: A hybrid metric combining absolute and rel- ative errors (2024), arXiv:2403.07492 [math.NA]

P. Xie, Hyb error: A hybrid metric combining absolute and rel- ative errors (2024), arXiv:2403.07492 [math.NA]

arXiv 2024
[37]

J. R. Samal, A. K. Pati, and A. Kumar, Experimental test of the quantum no-hiding theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 080401 (2011)

2011
[38]

Sakaguchi, H

U. Sakaguchi, H. Ozawa, and T. Fukumi, Method for effective pure states with any number of spins, Phys. Rev. A61, 042313 (2000)

2000
[39]

A. S. Holevo, Quantum coding theorems, Russ. Math. Surv.53, 1295 (1998)

1998
[40]

Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex ma- trices, Linear Algebra and its Applications10, 285 (1975)

M.-D. Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex ma- trices, Linear Algebra and its Applications10, 285 (1975)

1975
[41]

Jamiołkowski, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Reports on Mathe- matical Physics3, 275 (1972)

A. Jamiołkowski, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Reports on Mathe- matical Physics3, 275 (1972)

1972
[42]

Horodecki, P

M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions, Physics Letters A223, 1 (1996)

1996
[43]

M. M. Wilde,Quantum Information Theory, 2nd ed. (Cam- bridge University Press, 2017)

2017
[44]

King, The capacity of the quantum depolarizing channel (2002), arXiv:quant-ph/0204172 [quant-ph]

C. King, The capacity of the quantum depolarizing channel (2002), arXiv:quant-ph/0204172 [quant-ph]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[45]

Fanizza, F

M. Fanizza, F. Kianvash, and V . Giovannetti, Quantum flags and new bounds on the quantum capacity of the depolarizing channel, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 020503 (2020)

2020
[46]

Sutter, V

D. Sutter, V . B. Scholz, A. Winter, and R. Renner, Approximate degradable quantum channels, IEEE Transactions on Informa- tion Theory63, 7832 (2017)

2017
[47]

Leditzky, N

F. Leditzky, N. Datta, and G. Smith, Useful states and entangle- ment distillation, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory64, 4689 (2018)

2018
[48]

Smith and J

G. Smith and J. Yard, Quantum communication with zero-capacity channels, Science321, 1812 (2008), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1162242

work page doi:10.1126/science.1162242 2008
[49]

B. M. Fung, Use of pairs of pseudopure states for nmr quantum computing, Phys. Rev. A63, 022304 (2001)

2001
[50]

Toˇsner, T

Z. Toˇsner, T. V osegaard, C. Kehlet, N. Khaneja, S. J. Glaser, and N. C. Nielsen, Optimal control in nmr spectroscopy: Numeri- cal implementation in simpson, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 197, 120 (2009)

2009
[51]

Khaneja, T

N. Khaneja, T. Reiss, C. Kehlet, T. Schulte-Herbr ¨uggen, and S. J. Glaser, Optimal control of coupled spin dynamics: design of nmr pulse sequences by gradient ascent algorithms, Journal of Magnetic Resonance172, 296 (2005)

2005

[1] [1]

D. K. L. Oi, Interference of quantum channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 067902 (2003)

2003

[2] [2]

S. S. Roy, A. Shukla, and T. Mahesh, Nmr implementa- tion of a quantum delayed-choice experiment, Physical Re- view A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics85, 022109 (2012)

2012

[3] [3]

Chatterjee, H

A. Chatterjee, H. S. Karthik, T. S. Mahesh, and A. R. Usha Devi, Extreme violations of leggett-garg inequalities for a system evolving under superposition of unitaries, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 220202 (2025)

2025

[4] [4]

Oreshkov, F

O. Oreshkov, F. Costa, and ˇC. Brukner, Quantum correlations with no causal order, Nature Communications3, 1092 (2012)

2012

[5] [5]

Hardy, Towards quantum gravity: a framework for prob- abilistic theories with non-fixed causal structure, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical40, 3081 (2007)

L. Hardy, Towards quantum gravity: a framework for prob- abilistic theories with non-fixed causal structure, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical40, 3081 (2007)

2007

[6] [6]

W. C. Myrvold and J. Christian, eds.,Quantum Reality, Rela- tivistic Causality, and Closing the Epistemic Circle(Springer, 2009)

2009

[7] [7]

Chiribella, G

G. Chiribella, G. M. D’Ariano, P. Perinotti, and B. Valiron, Quantum computations without definite causal structure, Phys. Rev. A88, 022318 (2013)

2013

[8] [8]

P. A. Gu´erin, A. Feix, M. Ara´ujo, and i. c. v. Brukner, Exponen- tial communication complexity advantage from quantum super- position of the direction of communication, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 100502 (2016)

2016

[9] [10]

Chen, Y .-X

L. Chen, Y .-X. Yang, G.-C. Li, X.-S. Hong, S.-Q. Zhang, H.-Q. Xu, Y .-C. Liu, G. Chiribella, G. Chen, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Nonlinear enhancement of measurement precision via a hybrid quantum switch (2025), arXiv:2506.20632 [quant-ph]

arXiv 2025

[10] [11]

Yuan, C.-G

Y .-x. Yuan, C.-G. Song, and Q.-y. Cai, Enhanced quantum metrology with entangled quantum switch and probe state, Physica Scripta100, 075108 (2025)

2025

[11] [12]

X. Zhao, Y . Yang, and G. Chiribella, Quantum metrology with indefinite causal order, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 190503 (2020)

2020

[12] [13]

L. M. Procopio, A. Moqanaki, M. Ara ´ujo, F. Costa, I. Alonso Calafell, E. G. Dowd, D. R. Hamel, L. A. Rozema, ˇC. Brukner, and P. Walther, Experimental superposition of or- ders of quantum gates, Nature Communications6, 7913 (2015)

2015

[13] [14]

Goswami, C

K. Goswami, C. Giarmatzi, M. Kewming, F. Costa, C. Bran- ciard, J. Romero, and A. G. White, Indefinite causal order in a quantum switch, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 090503 (2018)

2018

[14] [15]

Rubino, L

G. Rubino, L. A. Rozema, A. Feix, M. Ara ´ujo, J. M. Zeuner, L. M. Procopio, ˇCaslav Brukner, and P. Walther, Experimental verification of an indefinite causal order, Science Advances3, e1602589 (2017), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.1602589

work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.1602589 2017

[15] [16]

Chiribella and H

G. Chiribella and H. Kristj ´ansson, Quantum shannon theory with superpositions of trajectories, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 475, 20180903 (2019)

2019

[16] [17]

Lai, J.-D

P.-R. Lai, J.-D. Lin, Y .-T. Huang, H.-C. Jan, and Y .-N. Chen, Quick charging of a quantum battery with superposed trajecto- ries, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023136 (2024)

2024

[17] [18]

Kumar, R

A. Kumar, R. Christy Rani Grace, and P. Madhu, Cross- correlations in nmr, Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy37, 191 (2000)

2000

[18] [19]

Salhov, Q

A. Salhov, Q. Cao, J. Cai, A. Retzker, F. Jelezko, and G. Genov, Protecting quantum information via destructive interference of correlated noise, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 223601 (2024)

2024

[19] [20]

Salzmann, K

M. Salzmann, K. Pervushin, G. Wider, H. Senn, and K. W ¨uthrich, Trosy in triple-resonance experiments: new per- spectives for sequential nmr assignment of large proteins, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences95, 13585 (1998)

1998

[20] [21]

A. A. Abbott, J. Wechs, D. Horsman, M. Mhalla, and C. Bran- ciard, Communication through coherent control of quantum channels, Quantum4, 333 (2020)

2020

[21] [22]

Chiribella, M

G. Chiribella, M. Banik, S. S. Bhattacharya, T. Guha, M. Al- imuddin, A. Roy, S. Saha, S. Agrawal, and G. Kar, Indefinite causal order enables perfect quantum communication with zero capacity channels, New Journal of Physics23, 033039 (2021)

2021

[22] [23]

Saha and U

S. Saha and U. Sen, Interference between lossy quantum evolu- tions activates information backflow (2025), arXiv:2507.22150 [quant-ph]

arXiv 2025

[23] [24]

Nathanson and M

M. Nathanson and M. B. Ruskai, Pauli diagonal channels con- stant on axes, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoret- ical40, 8171 (2007)

2007

[24] [25]

Siudzi ´nska, Geometry of pauli maps and pauli channels, Phys

K. Siudzi ´nska, Geometry of pauli maps and pauli channels, Phys. Rev. A100, 062331 (2019)

2019

[25] [26]

M. R. Geller and Z. Zhou, Efficient error models for fault- tolerant architectures and the pauli twirling approximation, 9 Phys. Rev. A88, 012314 (2013)

2013

[26] [27]

Horodecki, P

M. Horodecki, P. W. Shor, and M. B. Ruskai, Entanglement breaking channels, Reviews in Mathematical Physics15, 629 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129055X03001709

work page doi:10.1142/s0129055x03001709 2003

[27] [28]

M. B. Ruskai, Qubit entanglement breaking chan- nels, Reviews in Mathematical Physics15, 643 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129055X03001710

work page doi:10.1142/s0129055x03001710 2003

[28] [29]

X. Yuan, Y . Liu, Q. Zhao, B. Regula, J. Thompson, and M. Gu, Universal and operational benchmarking of quantum memories, npj Quantum Information7, 108 (2021)

2021

[29] [30]

Rosset, F

D. Rosset, F. Buscemi, and Y .-C. Liang, Resource theory of quantum memories and their faithful verification with minimal assumptions, Phys. Rev. X8, 021033 (2018)

2018

[30] [31]

L. B. Vieira, H.-Y . Ku, and C. Budroni, Entanglement- breaking channels are a quantum memory resource (2024), arXiv:2402.16789 [quant-ph]

arXiv 2024

[31] [32]

S. Hao, H. Shi, W. Li, J. H. Shapiro, Q. Zhuang, and Z. Zhang, Entanglement-assisted communication surpassing the ultimate classical capacity, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 250501 (2021)

2021

[32] [33]

Pereg, Communication over entanglement-breaking chan- nels with unreliable entanglement assistance, Phys

U. Pereg, Communication over entanglement-breaking chan- nels with unreliable entanglement assistance, Phys. Rev. A108, 042616 (2023)

2023

[33] [34]

M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

2010

[34] [35]

W. F. Stinespring, Positive functions on c*-algebras, Proceed- ings of the American Mathematical Society6, 211–216 (1955)

1955

[35] [36]

Xie, Hyb error: A hybrid metric combining absolute and rel- ative errors (2024), arXiv:2403.07492 [math.NA]

P. Xie, Hyb error: A hybrid metric combining absolute and rel- ative errors (2024), arXiv:2403.07492 [math.NA]

arXiv 2024

[36] [37]

J. R. Samal, A. K. Pati, and A. Kumar, Experimental test of the quantum no-hiding theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 080401 (2011)

2011

[37] [38]

Sakaguchi, H

U. Sakaguchi, H. Ozawa, and T. Fukumi, Method for effective pure states with any number of spins, Phys. Rev. A61, 042313 (2000)

2000

[38] [39]

A. S. Holevo, Quantum coding theorems, Russ. Math. Surv.53, 1295 (1998)

1998

[39] [40]

Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex ma- trices, Linear Algebra and its Applications10, 285 (1975)

M.-D. Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex ma- trices, Linear Algebra and its Applications10, 285 (1975)

1975

[40] [41]

Jamiołkowski, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Reports on Mathe- matical Physics3, 275 (1972)

A. Jamiołkowski, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Reports on Mathe- matical Physics3, 275 (1972)

1972

[41] [42]

Horodecki, P

M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions, Physics Letters A223, 1 (1996)

1996

[42] [43]

M. M. Wilde,Quantum Information Theory, 2nd ed. (Cam- bridge University Press, 2017)

2017

[43] [44]

King, The capacity of the quantum depolarizing channel (2002), arXiv:quant-ph/0204172 [quant-ph]

C. King, The capacity of the quantum depolarizing channel (2002), arXiv:quant-ph/0204172 [quant-ph]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

[44] [45]

Fanizza, F

M. Fanizza, F. Kianvash, and V . Giovannetti, Quantum flags and new bounds on the quantum capacity of the depolarizing channel, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 020503 (2020)

2020

[45] [46]

Sutter, V

D. Sutter, V . B. Scholz, A. Winter, and R. Renner, Approximate degradable quantum channels, IEEE Transactions on Informa- tion Theory63, 7832 (2017)

2017

[46] [47]

Leditzky, N

F. Leditzky, N. Datta, and G. Smith, Useful states and entangle- ment distillation, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory64, 4689 (2018)

2018

[47] [48]

Smith and J

G. Smith and J. Yard, Quantum communication with zero-capacity channels, Science321, 1812 (2008), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1162242

work page doi:10.1126/science.1162242 2008

[48] [49]

B. M. Fung, Use of pairs of pseudopure states for nmr quantum computing, Phys. Rev. A63, 022304 (2001)

2001

[49] [50]

Toˇsner, T

Z. Toˇsner, T. V osegaard, C. Kehlet, N. Khaneja, S. J. Glaser, and N. C. Nielsen, Optimal control in nmr spectroscopy: Numeri- cal implementation in simpson, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 197, 120 (2009)

2009

[50] [51]

Khaneja, T

N. Khaneja, T. Reiss, C. Kehlet, T. Schulte-Herbr ¨uggen, and S. J. Glaser, Optimal control of coupled spin dynamics: design of nmr pulse sequences by gradient ascent algorithms, Journal of Magnetic Resonance172, 296 (2005)

2005