pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12546 · v1 · pith:J44CTWN2new · submitted 2026-06-10 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Polarization Formalism for Photon-Gravitational Wave Mixing Around Magnetars

Jean-Simon C\^ot\'e , Jean-Fran\c{c}ois Fortin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 08:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th
keywords Gertsenshtein effectmagnetarsgravitational wavesstochastic backgroundphoton-graviton mixingStokes parameterspolarization formalism
0
0 comments X

The pith

The stochastic gravitational wave background from magnetar electromagnetic emission via the Gertsenshtein effect is negligible.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper solves the evolution equations for Stokes parameters that describe polarization during photon-gravitational wave mixing in magnetar magnetospheres. It shows the adiabatic approximation commonly used in the literature does not hold in general but is valid in two specific geometries chosen for analytic work. From these cases the authors obtain a lower bound on the stochastic gravitational wave background generated by conversion of magnetar emissions and an upper bound by requiring that conversion of background gravitational waves into electromagnetic radiation stays below observed magnetar X-ray fluxes. The resulting bounds demonstrate that the contribution to the high-frequency stochastic background is negligible.

Core claim

By solving the evolution equations of the associated Stokes parameters for the Gertsenshtein conversion process, the paper derives a lower bound on the stochastic gravitational wave background produced by magnetar electromagnetic emission and an upper bound from the requirement that incoming gravitational waves do not overproduce the observed X-ray flux; these bounds establish that the generated gravitational waves produce a negligible stochastic background.

What carries the argument

The evolution equations of the Stokes parameters tracking polarization changes during photon-gravitational wave mixing in strong magnetic fields.

If this is right

  • The contribution of magnetar emissions to the high-frequency stochastic gravitational wave background is negligible.
  • Magnetar X-ray observations can place upper limits on the amplitude of background gravitational waves at frequencies inaccessible to standard detectors.
  • Analytical results for the mixing process are restricted to geometries where the adiabatic approximation remains valid.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Realistic magnetar magnetospheres may require numerical integration of the Stokes equations outside the two chosen geometries.
  • The same polarization formalism could be applied to other compact objects with strong magnetic fields to check for similar conversion effects.

Load-bearing premise

The adiabatic approximation holds in the two specific geometries chosen for the analytical derivations.

What would settle it

A measurement of the high-frequency stochastic gravitational wave background exceeding the derived lower bound, or an observed magnetar X-ray flux that cannot be explained without significant gravitational wave conversion, would falsify the negligibility result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12546 by Jean-Fran\c{c}ois Fortin, Jean-Simon C\^ot\'e.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Geometry for the magnetosphere of a magnetar and the electromagnetic–gravitational wave propagation. The magnetar is centered at the origin, with the magnetic field assumed to follow a dipolar configuration dictated by the magnetic moment ˆm. An electromagnetic–gravitational wave propagates along the ˆz direction with an impact parameter b, subject to a magnetic field B with transverse components Bt . eval… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Conversion probability and phase shifts induced by the Gertsenshtein effect as functions of the polar angle relative to the magnetic moment α and angular frequency ω. Green curves are obtained from the numerical integration of (3.4) and (3.7), blue curves from the exact expressions (3.5), and red curves from the analytical approximations (3.8) and (3.10). The three results nearly coincide, leaving only the… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Conversion probability and diagonal phase shift induced by the Gertsenshtein effect as functions of the dimensionless impact parameter ¯b = b/r0 and angular frequency ω. The green curves are obtained from numerical integration of (3.14) and (3.16), the red curves correspond to the analytical approximations (3.20) and (3.21) in the regime b ∼ r0, and the blue curves denote the asymptotic approximations (3.1… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Characteristic strain measured at Earth from gravitational waves produced through Gertsenshtein conversion of radially propagating X-rays in magnetars’ magnetospheres. 4.2. Upper Bounds To obtain upper bounds, we consider a HFGW from the background passing near a neutron star, where it would be partially converted into photons via the inverse Gertsenshtein effect. Assuming an unpolarized gravitational wave… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Upper bounds on the characteristic strain of the gravitational-wave background derived from Gertsenshtein conversion in magnetars’ magnetospheres. the evolution equations of the photon–graviton system and pointed out that the latter do not generally decouple into two independent systems: the adiabatic approximation is not justified due to the smallness of the inverse Planck mass. By investigating two speci… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Gertsenshtein effect can be used to probe the stochastic gravitational wave background at high frequencies, well above the range of standard cosmological sources. In this paper, we revisit the conversion between electromagnetic and gravitational waves in the magnetosphere of magnetars by solving the evolution equations of the associated Stokes parameters. In the process, we point out that the adiabatic approximation usually taken in the literature is not generally justified in the context of the Gertsenshtein effect. To derive analytical results, we focus our attention on two specific geometries where the adiabatic approximation is valid. From these, we derive a lower bound on the stochastic gravitational wave background from the conversion of magnetar electromagnetic emission into gravitational waves, and an upper bound by requiring that the conversion of background gravitational waves into electromagnetic radiation does not exceed the observed magnetar flux in the X-ray band. Our results demonstrate that gravitational waves generated through the Gertsenshtein conversion of magnetar electromagnetic emission produce a negligible stochastic background, as anticipated.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper develops a polarization formalism for photon-gravitational wave mixing in magnetar magnetospheres by solving the evolution equations for the associated Stokes parameters. It notes that the adiabatic approximation is not generally valid and restricts analytical derivations to two specific geometries where the approximation holds. From these, it obtains a lower bound on the stochastic gravitational wave background produced by conversion of magnetar electromagnetic emission into gravitational waves, and an upper bound by requiring that the reverse conversion does not exceed observed X-ray fluxes. The central conclusion is that gravitational waves generated via this mechanism produce a negligible stochastic background.

Significance. If the bounds prove robust, the work supplies a concrete constraint on high-frequency stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds from an astrophysical source, reinforcing the expectation that Gertsenshtein conversion in magnetars is subdominant. The systematic use of Stokes-parameter evolution equations offers a clear framework for tracking polarization, which is a methodological strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sections deriving the analytical bounds in the two geometries] The lower and upper bounds on the stochastic GW background rest exclusively on analytical results derived in two geometries where the adiabatic approximation is valid. Although the manuscript correctly states that the approximation does not hold in general, no quantitative metric (e.g., volume fraction of the magnetosphere satisfying the adiabatic condition or distribution of field-line curvatures) is supplied to establish that these geometries dominate typical magnetar magnetospheres. If non-adiabatic regions contribute appreciably to the integrated conversion probability, both bounds could shift by orders of magnitude, directly affecting the negligibility claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying a point that merits clarification. We address the major comment below and indicate where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Sections deriving the analytical bounds in the two geometries] The lower and upper bounds on the stochastic GW background rest exclusively on analytical results derived in two geometries where the adiabatic approximation is valid. Although the manuscript correctly states that the approximation does not hold in general, no quantitative metric (e.g., volume fraction of the magnetosphere satisfying the adiabatic condition or distribution of field-line curvatures) is supplied to establish that these geometries dominate typical magnetar magnetospheres. If non-adiabatic regions contribute appreciably to the integrated conversion probability, both bounds could shift by orders of magnitude, directly affecting the negligibility claim.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit quantitative metric, such as a volume fraction or curvature distribution, is not provided in the current text. The two geometries were selected precisely because they permit analytic solution of the Stokes-parameter equations under the adiabatic condition and yield the highest conversion probabilities; in non-adiabatic regimes the rapid variation of the propagation eigenstates produces rapid oscillations in the Stokes parameters whose time-averaged conversion probability is suppressed by the large phase mismatch. Consequently the net integrated conversion probability is dominated by the adiabatic patches, and the bounds derived there remain the most constraining. We will add a short paragraph in the revised manuscript that makes this averaging argument explicit and supplies a rough order-of-magnitude estimate of the adiabatic volume fraction based on standard magnetar dipole-field models. This addition does not change the conclusion that the resulting stochastic background is negligible. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; bounds derived from external X-ray data and specific adiabatic geometries

full rationale

The paper solves the Stokes parameter evolution equations for photon-gravitational wave mixing and derives analytical lower/upper bounds on the stochastic GW background only in two geometries where the adiabatic approximation holds, while correctly noting the approximation's limited validity. The upper bound is set by requiring that GW-to-EM conversion does not exceed observed magnetar X-ray fluxes (external benchmark), and the lower bound follows from EM-to-GW conversion in those geometries. No equations reduce predictions to fitted parameters by construction, no load-bearing self-citations appear, and no ansatz or uniqueness theorem is smuggled in via prior author work. The derivation remains self-contained against external observations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Relies on domain assumptions about magnetar emission and magnetic field geometries plus the validity of the adiabatic approximation in two cases; no free parameters or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Adiabatic approximation is valid in the two specific geometries selected for analytical results
    Explicitly invoked to derive the bounds

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5707 in / 1020 out tokens · 19036 ms · 2026-06-27T08:56:30.825747+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al.,“Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger”, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al.,“GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral”, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017),arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Particle production during inflation and gravitational waves de- tectable by ground-based interferometers

    J. L. Cook & L. Sorbo,“Particle production during inflation and gravitational waves de- tectable by ground-based interferometers”, Phys. Rev. D85, 023534 (2012), arXiv:1109.0022 [astro-ph.CO], [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 86, 069901 (2012)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    Probing inflation models with gravitational waves

    V. Domcke,“Probing inflation models with gravitational waves”, in“51st Rencontres de Moriond on Cosmology”

  5. [5]

    Primordial gravitational waves, precisely: The role of thermodynamics in the Standard Model

    K. Saikawa & S. Shirai,“Primordial gravitational waves, precisely: The role of thermodynamics in the Standard Model”, JCAP05, 035 (2018),arXiv:1803.01038 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    Stochastic gravitational waves from postinflationary structure formation

    B. Eggemeier, J. C. Niemeyer, K. Jedamzik & R. Easther,“Stochastic gravitational waves from postinflationary structure formation”, Phys. Rev. D107, 043503 (2023), arXiv:2212.00425 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Relic gravitational waves produced after preheating

    S. Y. Khlebnikov & I. I. Tkachev,“Relic gravitational waves produced after preheating”, Phys. Rev. D56, 653 (1997),hep-ph/9701423

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  8. [8]

    Gravitational Wave Production At The End Of Inflation

    R. Easther, J. T. Giblin, Jr. & E. A. Lim,“Gravitational Wave Production At The End Of Inflation”, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 221301 (2007),astro-ph/0612294

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  9. [9]

    Gravitational wave production from preheating: parameter dependence

    D. G. Figueroa & F. Torrenti,“Gravitational wave production from preheating: parameter dependence”, JCAP10, 057 (2017),arXiv:1707.04533 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    Gravitational wave background from Standard Model physics: Quali- tative features

    J. Ghiglieri & M. Laine,“Gravitational wave background from Standard Model physics: Quali- tative features”, JCAP07, 022 (2015),arXiv:1504.02569 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  11. [11]

    Gravitational Waves as a Big Bang Thermome- ter

    A. Ringwald, J. Sch¨ utte-Engel & C. Tamarit,“Gravitational Waves as a Big Bang Thermome- ter”, JCAP03, 054 (2021),arXiv:2011.04731 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Gravitational wave background from Stan- dard Model physics: Complete leading order

    J. Ghiglieri, G. Jackson, M. Laine & Y. Zhu,“Gravitational wave background from Stan- dard Model physics: Complete leading order”, JHEP2007, 092 (2020), arXiv:2004.11392 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    Cosmic Separation of Phases

    E. Witten,“Cosmic Separation of Phases”, Phys. Rev. D30, 272 (1984)

    1984

  14. [14]

    Gravitational radiation from cosmological phase transitions

    C. J. Hogan,“Gravitational radiation from cosmological phase transitions”, Mon. Not. Roy. As- tron. Soc.218, 629 (1986). 30

    1986

  15. [15]

    Can we observe the QCD phase transition-generated gravitational waves through pulsar timing arrays?

    A. Brandenburg, E. Clarke, Y. He & T. Kahniashvili,“Can we observe the QCD phase transition-generated gravitational waves through pulsar timing arrays?”, Phys. Rev. D104, 043513 (2021),arXiv:2102.12428 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Probing Beyond the Standard Model with Gravitational Waves from Phase Transi- tions

    C. Caprini,“Probing Beyond the Standard Model with Gravitational Waves from Phase Transi- tions”, HiHEP1, 22 (2025),arXiv:2602.02861 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Stochastic gravitational wave background from smoothed cosmic string loops

    J. J. Blanco-Pillado & K. D. Olum,“Stochastic gravitational wave background from smoothed cosmic string loops”, Phys. Rev. D96, 104046 (2017),arXiv:1709.02693 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  18. [18]

    Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA

    P. Auclair et al.,“Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA”, JCAP04, 034 (2020),arXiv:1909.00819 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Ultrahigh frequency primordial gravitational waves beyond the kHz: The case of cosmic strings

    G. Servant & P. Simakachorn,“Ultrahigh frequency primordial gravitational waves beyond the kHz: The case of cosmic strings”, Phys. Rev. D109, 103538 (2024), arXiv:2312.09281 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Exploring properties of high-density matter through remnants of neutron-star mergers

    A. Bauswein, N. Stergioulas & H.-T. Janka,“Exploring properties of high-density matter through remnants of neutron-star mergers”, Eur. Phys. J. A52, 56 (2016), arXiv:1508.05493 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  21. [21]

    Gravitational waves from coalescing black hole MACHO binaries

    T. Nakamura, M. Sasaki, T. Tanaka & K. S. Thorne,“Gravitational waves from coalescing black hole MACHO binaries”, Astrophys. J. Lett.487, L139 (1997),astro-ph/9708060

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  22. [22]

    Primordial Black Hole Scenario for the Gravitational-Wave Event GW150914

    M. Sasaki, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka & S. Yokoyama,“Primordial Black Hole Scenario for the Gravitational-Wave Event GW150914”, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 061101 (2016), arXiv:1603.08338 [astro-ph.CO], [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 059901 (2018)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    Prospective constraints on the primordial black hole abundance from the stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds produced by coalescing events and curvature perturbations

    S. Wang, T. Terada & K. Kohri,“Prospective constraints on the primordial black hole abundance from the stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds produced by coalescing events and curvature perturbations”, Phys. Rev. D99, 103531 (2019), arXiv:1903.05924 [astro-ph.CO] , [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 101, 069901 (2020)]

    arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    Compact stars made of fermionic dark matter

    G. Narain, J. Schaffner-Bielich & I. N. Mishustin,“Compact stars made of fermionic dark matter”, Phys. Rev. D74, 063003 (2006),astro-ph/0605724

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  25. [25]

    Hunting for Dark Particles with Gravitational Waves

    G. F. Giudice, M. McCullough & A. Urbano,“Hunting for Dark Particles with Gravitational Waves”, JCAP10, 001 (2016),arXiv:1605.01209 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  26. [26]

    Moduli Stars

    S. Krippendorf, F. Muia & F. Quevedo,“Moduli Stars”, JHEP1808, 070 (2018), arXiv:1806.04690 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    Discovering the QCD Axion with Black Holes and Gravitational Waves

    A. Arvanitaki, M. Baryakhtar & X. Huang,“Discovering the QCD Axion with Black Holes and Gravitational Waves”, Phys. Rev. D91, 084011 (2015),arXiv:1411.2263 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  28. [28]

    Gravitational waves from superradiant cloud level transition

    S.-T. Peng & J. Zhang,“Gravitational waves from superradiant cloud level transition”, Phys. Rev. D113, 064038 (2026),arXiv:2504.00728 [gr-qc]. 31

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Cosmological backgrounds of gravitational waves

    C. Caprini & D. G. Figueroa,“Cosmological backgrounds of gravitational waves”, Classi- cal and Quantum Gravity35, 163001 (2018)

    2018

  30. [30]

    Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies

    N. Aggarwal et al.,“Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies”, Living Rev. Rel.24, 4 (2021),arXiv:2011.12414 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Stochastic Gravitational- Wave Backgrounds: Current Detection Efforts and Future Prospects

    A. I. Renzini, B. Goncharov, A. C. Jenkins & P. M. Meyers,“Stochastic Gravitational- Wave Backgrounds: Current Detection Efforts and Future Prospects”, Galaxies10, 34 (2022), arXiv:2202.00178 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Gravitational wave scattering on magnetic fields

    V. Domcke, C. Garcia-Cely & S. M. Lee,“Gravitational wave scattering on magnetic fields”, JCAP11, 016 (2025),arXiv:2507.16609 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    The McGill Magnetar Catalog

    S. A. Olausen & V. M. Kaspi,“The McGill Magnetar Catalog”, Astrophys. J. Suppl.212, 6 (2014),arXiv:1309.4167 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  34. [34]

    Magnetars

    V. M. Kaspi & A. Beloborodov,“Magnetars”, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.55, 261 (2017), arXiv:1703.00068 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  35. [35]

    The First Day in the Life of a Magnetar: Evolution of the Inclination Angle, Magnetic Dipole Moment, and Braking Index of Millisecond Magnetars during Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows

    S. S ¸a¸ smaz Mu¸ s, S.C ¸ıkınto˘ glu, U. Ayg¨ un, I. C. Anda¸ c & K. Y. Ek¸ si,“The First Day in the Life of a Magnetar: Evolution of the Inclination Angle, Magnetic Dipole Moment, and Braking Index of Millisecond Magnetars during Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows”, The Astrophysical Journal 886, 5 (2019),https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:119309172

    2019

  36. [36]

    Consequences of Dirac’s theory of positrons

    W. Heisenberg & H. Euler,“Consequences of Dirac’s theory of positrons”, Z. Phys.98, 714 (1936),physics/0605038

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1936

  37. [37]

    Resonant conversion of gravitational waves in neutron star magnetospheres

    J. I. McDonald & S. A. R. Ellis,“Resonant conversion of gravitational waves in neutron star magnetospheres”, Phys. Rev. D110, 103003 (2024),arXiv:2406.18634 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Mixing of the Photon with Low Mass Particles

    G. Raffelt & L. Stodolsky,“Mixing of the Photon with Low Mass Particles”, Phys. Rev. D37, 1237 (1988)

    1988

  39. [39]

    Probing axions with radiation from magnetic stars

    D. Lai & J. Heyl,“Probing axions with radiation from magnetic stars”, Phys. Rev. D74, 123003 (2006),https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.123003

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.123003 2006

  40. [40]

    Photon-dark photon conversions in extreme background electromag- netic fields

    J.-F. Fortin & K. Sinha,“Photon-dark photon conversions in extreme background electromag- netic fields”, JCAP11, 020 (2019),arXiv:1904.08968 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Electromagnetic polarization in partially ionized plasmas with strong magnetic fields and neutron star atmosphere models

    A. Y. Potekhin, D. Lai, G. Chabrier & W. C. G. Ho,“Electromagnetic polarization in partially ionized plasmas with strong magnetic fields and neutron star atmosphere models”, Astrophys. J. 612, 1034 (2004),astro-ph/0405383

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  42. [42]

    Graviton-photon conversion in stochastic magnetic fields

    W. Chiba, R. Jinno & K. Nomura,“Graviton-photon conversion in stochastic magnetic fields”, Phys. Rev. D112, 083539 (2025),arXiv:2505.10926 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Graviton-photon mixing

    D. Ejlli & V. R. Thandlam,“Graviton-photon mixing”, Phys. Rev. D99, 044022 (2019), arXiv:1807.00171 [gr-qc]. 32

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  44. [44]

    High-Frequency Gravitational Wave Constraints from Graviton-Photon Conversion in the M87 Galaxy

    A. Gupta, P. Majumdar, S. Roy & P. Sarkar,“High-Frequency Gravitational Wave Constraints from Graviton-Photon Conversion in the M87 Galaxy”,arXiv:2604.01290 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  45. [45]

    Limits on High-Frequency Gravitational Waves in Planetary Magnetospheres

    T. Liu, J. Ren & C. Zhang,“Limits on High-Frequency Gravitational Waves in Planetary Magnetospheres”, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 131402 (2024),arXiv:2305.01832 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    High Frequency Gravitational Wave bounds from galactic neutron stars

    V. Dandoy, T. Bert´ olez-Mart´ ınez & F. Costa,“High Frequency Gravitational Wave bounds from galactic neutron stars”, JCAP12, 023 (2024),arXiv:2402.14092 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Polarization formalism for ALP-induced X-ray emission from magnetars

    J.-F. Fortin & K. Sinha,“Polarization formalism for ALP-induced X-ray emission from magnetars”, JCAP08, 042 (2023),arXiv:2303.17641 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    X-ray Signatures of Axion Conversion in Magnetic White Dwarf Stars

    C. Dessert, A. J. Long & B. R. Safdi,“X-ray Signatures of Axion Conversion in Magnetic White Dwarf Stars”, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 061104 (2019),arXiv:1903.05088 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    X-Ray Polarization Signals from Magnetars with Axion-Like- Particles

    J.-F. Fortin & K. Sinha,“X-Ray Polarization Signals from Magnetars with Axion-Like- Particles”, JHEP1901, 163 (2019),arXiv:1807.10773 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    Probing high frequency gravitational waves with pulsars

    A. Ito, K. Kohri & K. Nakayama,“Probing high frequency gravitational waves with pulsars”, Phys. Rev. D109, 063026 (2024),arXiv:2305.13984 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Fitting Pulsar Wind Tori. II. Error Analysis and Applications

    C.-Y. Ng & R. Romani,“Fitting Pulsar Wind Tori. II. Error Analysis and Applications”, The Astrophysical Journal673, 411 (2008)

    2008

  52. [52]

    Shimmering gravitons in the gamma-ray sky

    S. Ramazanov, R. Samanta, G. Trenkler & F. Urban,“Shimmering gravitons in the gamma-ray sky”, Publisher: IOP Publishing,https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2023/06/019

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/06/019 2023

  53. [53]

    Magnetars and axion-like particles: probes with the hard X-ray spectrum

    J.-F. Fortin, H.-K. Guo, S. P. Harris, E. Sheridan & K. Sinha,“Magnetars and axion-like particles: probes with the hard X-ray spectrum”, JCAP06, 036 (2021), arXiv:2101.05302 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Gravitational wave experiments and early universe cosmology

    M. Maggiore,“Gravitational wave experiments and early universe cosmology”, Phys. Rept. 331, 283 (2000),gr-qc/9909001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  55. [55]

    Asymptotic Expansions of Integrals

    N. Bleistein & R. Handelsman,“Asymptotic Expansions of Integrals”, Dover Publications (1986)

    1986

  56. [56]

    The discovery of a new hard X- ray source in the Norma region by INTEGRAL: IGR J16293-4603

    L. Kuiper, P. G. Jonker, M. A. P. Torres, A. Rest & S. Keek,“The discovery of a new hard X- ray source in the Norma region by INTEGRAL: IGR J16293-4603”, The Astronomer’s Telegram 1774, 1 (2008)

    2008

  57. [57]

    Kuiper, W

    L. Kuiper, W. Hermsen, P. den Hartog & J. Urama,“TEMPORAL AND SPECTRAL EVO- LUTION IN X- AND γ-RAYS OF MAGNETAR 1E 1547.0–5408 SINCE ITS 2008 OCTOBER OUTBURST: THE DISCOVERY OF A TRANSIENT HARD PULSED COMPONENT AFTER ITS 2009 JANUARY OUTBURST”, The Astrophysical Journal748, 133 (2012)

    2008

  58. [58]

    The long-term enhanced brightness of the magnetar 1E 1547.0–5408

    F. Coti Zelati, A. Borghese, N. Rea, D. Vigan` o, T. Enoto, P. Esposito, J. A. Pons, S. Cam- pana & G. L. Israel,“The long-term enhanced brightness of the magnetar 1E 1547.0–5408”, Astronomy & amp; Astrophysics633, A31 (2020). 33

    2020

  59. [59]

    Discovery of hard non-thermal pulsed X-ray emis- sion from the anomalous X-ray pulsar 1E 1841–045

    L. Kuiper, W. Hermsen & M. Mendez,“Discovery of hard non-thermal pulsed X-ray emis- sion from the anomalous X-ray pulsar 1E 1841–045”, Astrophys. J.613, 1173 (2004), astro-ph/0404582

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  60. [60]

    Suzaku Observation of the Anomalous X-Ray Pulsar 1E 1841– 045

    M. Morii, S. Kitamoto, N. Shibazaki, N. Kawai, M. Arimoto, M. Ueno, T. Kohmura, Y. Terada, S. Yamauchi & H. Takahashi,“Suzaku Observation of the Anomalous X-Ray Pulsar 1E 1841– 045”, Publications- Astronomical Society of Japan62, 1249 (2010)

    2010

  61. [61]

    Magnetar Broadband X-ray Spectra Correlated with Magnetic Fields: Suzaku Archive of SGRs and AXPs Combined with NuSTAR, Swift, and RXTE

    T. Enoto, S. Shibata, T. Kitaguchi, Y. Suwa, T. Uchide, H. Nishioka, S. Kisaka, T. Nakano, H. Murakami & K. Makishima,“Magnetar Broadband X-ray Spectra Correlated with Magnetic Fields: Suzaku Archive of SGRs and AXPs Combined with NuSTAR, Swift, and RXTE”, Astrophys. J. Suppl.231, 8 (2017),arXiv:1704.07018 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  62. [62]

    Soft and Hard X-Ray Emissions from the Anomalous X-Ray Pulsar 4U 0142+61 Observed with Suzaku

    T. Enoto, K. Makishima, K. Nakazawa, M. Kokubun, M. Kawaharada, J. Kotoku & N. Shibazaki,“Soft and Hard X-Ray Emissions from the Anomalous X-Ray Pulsar 4U 0142+61 Observed with Suzaku”, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan63, 387 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/63.2.387

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/63.2.387 2011

  63. [63]

    Hard X-ray emission cutoff in the anomalous X-ray pulsar 4U 0142+61 detected by INTEGRAL

    W. Wang, H. Tong & Y. Guo,“Hard X-ray emission cutoff in the anomalous X-ray pulsar 4U 0142+61 detected by INTEGRAL”, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics14, 673 (2013), https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:119125586

    2013

  64. [64]

    The Sleeping Monster: NuSTAR Observations of SGR 1806–20, 11 Years After the Giant Flare

    G. Younes, M. Baring, C. Kouveliotou, A. Harding, S. Donovan, E. G¨ o˘ g¨ u¸ s, V. Kaspi & J. Granot,“The Sleeping Monster: NuSTAR Observations of SGR 1806–20, 11 Years After the Giant Flare”, The Astrophysical Journal851, 17 (2017)

    2017

  65. [65]

    A downward revision to the distance of the 1806-20 cluster and associated magnetar from Gemini Near-Infrared Spec- troscopy

    J. L. Bibby, P. A. Crowther, J. P. Furness & J. S. Clark,“A downward revision to the distance of the 1806-20 cluster and associated magnetar from Gemini Near-Infrared Spec- troscopy”, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters386, 23 (2008), https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:14466990. 34

    2008