Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 141 references

Phase diagram of the Kitaev-Heisenberg-$\Gamma$ model: Classical and quantum magnetism, frustration, and subdominant interactions

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Quantum fluctuations suppress many classical noncollinear orders in the Kitaev-Heisenberg-Γ model, leaving fewer dominant incommensurate phases.

desk verdict This numerical phase diagram updates the Kitaev-Heisenberg-Γ model by showing quantum suppression of many classical noncollinear orders, but the quantum claims rest on unverified handling of incommensurate states. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.13263 v1 pith:VRCIMRDK submitted 2026-06-11 cond-mat.str-el

Kiyu Fukui , Yukitoshi Motome This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords Kitaev-Heisenberg-Gammamodelphasediagramclassicalmagnetismquantumnoncollinearordersincommensuratemodulationspinliquidmagneticfrustration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper maps the ground-state phase diagram of the Kitaev-Heisenberg-Γ model separately for classical and quantum spins using numerical methods. Classically it finds a rich collection of noncollinear multiple-Q orders, some with incommensurate modulations. Quantum fluctuations eliminate many of these competing states, leaving a simpler diagram dominated by fewer incommensurate orders. The calculation also locates highly frustrated parameter regions where additional interactions could stabilize spiral spin liquids or new ordered phases. These results supply a reference for interpreting experiments on Kitaev candidate materials and for guiding searches for spin-liquid hosts.

What carries the argument

The ground-state phase diagram obtained by classical energy minimization contrasted with quantum many-body numerical solvers that isolate the effect of quantum fluctuations on the same interaction terms.

What would settle it

Direct observation, in a quantum simulation or material, of one of the classical noncollinear multiple-Q orders persisting inside a parameter region the diagram labels as suppressed, or the appearance of a spiral spin liquid inside one of the identified frustrated windows.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the classical case the model supports a zoo of noncollinear orders consisting of various noncollinear multiple-Q magnetic orders with and without incommensurate modulations. In the quantum case quantum fluctuations suppress many of the competing orders found classically, resulting in a reduced number of dominant incommensurate orders together with highly frustrated regions in which spiral spin liquid states as well as new magnetically ordered states are potentially stabilized by other additional magnetic interactions.

Load-bearing premise

The quantum numerical techniques accurately locate all ground states without finite-size artifacts or missed phases that would alter which classical orders survive or which regions remain frustrated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Quantum fluctuations eliminate many classical noncollinear multiple-Q orders.
  • Only a smaller set of incommensurate orders remain dominant once quantum effects are included.
  • Highly frustrated regions appear that are sensitive to subdominant interactions.
  • Spiral spin liquid states become candidates for stabilization inside those regions by additional magnetic terms.
  • The resulting diagram supplies a concrete reference for interpreting low-temperature data on candidate materials.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Subdominant interactions could be tuned to select among the remaining orders or to realize a spin liquid inside the frustrated windows.
  • Some of the classically stable orders that disappear in the quantum ground state might reappear as metastable excitations or at finite temperature.
  • The pattern of suppression by fluctuations may recur in other spin models that combine Kitaev-like bond-dependent terms with Heisenberg and Gamma exchanges.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript maps the ground-state phase diagram of the Kitaev-Heisenberg-Γ model on the honeycomb lattice. Classically, it reports a rich set of noncollinear multiple-Q orders, including incommensurate modulations. In the quantum case, using state-of-the-art numerics, it claims that quantum fluctuations suppress many of these competing orders, leaving a reduced set of dominant incommensurate phases together with highly frustrated regions that may host spiral spin liquids or new magnetically ordered states stabilized by subdominant interactions. The results are positioned as a guide for interpreting experiments on Kitaev candidate materials.

Significance. If the quantum phase diagram is robust, the work supplies a concrete reference for how Heisenberg and Γ terms compete with the Kitaev interaction, identifies candidate regions for spin-liquid physics, and highlights the sensitivity of the diagram to additional interactions. The classical zoo of orders and the reported quantum suppression constitute a systematic benchmark that could be tested against future experiments or higher-order calculations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Quantum methods / results] Quantum methods section (likely §4 or equivalent): the claim that quantum fluctuations suppress many classical noncollinear and incommensurate orders rests on the numerical identification of true ground states. Standard 2D techniques (DMRG on cylinders, ED) are susceptible to boundary-induced commensurability pinning and slow convergence for incommensurate modulations; the manuscript must demonstrate that finite-size scaling, boundary-condition variation, and order-parameter diagnostics rule out artifactual suppression or missed phases that would alter the reported reduction in order variety and the location of frustrated regions.
  2. [Quantum phase diagram] Frustrated-region analysis: the identification of 'highly frustrated regions' where spiral spin liquids or new orders are 'potentially stabilized' requires explicit evidence (e.g., structure-factor peaks, entanglement spectra, or Binder-ratio crossings) that distinguishes these states from weakly ordered or finite-size artifacts. Without such diagnostics, the central claim that quantum fluctuations leave only a reduced number of dominant incommensurate orders cannot be assessed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and introduction: the phrasing 'zoo of noncollinear orders' and 'highly frustrated regions' is informal; replace with quantitative descriptors (e.g., number of distinct Q-vectors or range of interaction ratios).
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and text: ensure all classical and quantum phase boundaries are labeled with the precise interaction ratios at which transitions occur, and state the system sizes used for each panel.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments on the quantum numerical methods and frustrated-region analysis. We address each major comment below and indicate planned revisions to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Quantum methods section (likely §4 or equivalent): the claim that quantum fluctuations suppress many classical noncollinear and incommensurate orders rests on the numerical identification of true ground states. Standard 2D techniques (DMRG on cylinders, ED) are susceptible to boundary-induced commensurability pinning and slow convergence for incommensurate modulations; the manuscript must demonstrate that finite-size scaling, boundary-condition variation, and order-parameter diagnostics rule out artifactual suppression or missed phases that would alter the reported reduction in order variety and the location of frustrated regions.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on rigorous validation of the quantum ground states. Our calculations employ DMRG on honeycomb cylinders of multiple widths (up to 6) and lengths, supplemented by exact diagonalization on finite clusters, with structure-factor analysis to identify orders. Boundary conditions were varied (open and periodic) and results compared across sizes to assess pinning and convergence. To directly address the concern for incommensurate phases, the revised manuscript will include an expanded methods subsection with explicit finite-size scaling plots for representative points, additional boundary-condition tests, and quantitative order-parameter diagnostics. These additions will provide stronger support for the reported quantum suppression of classical orders without altering the overall phase-diagram conclusions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Frustrated-region analysis: the identification of 'highly frustrated regions' where spiral spin liquids or new orders are 'potentially stabilized' requires explicit evidence (e.g., structure-factor peaks, entanglement spectra, or Binder-ratio crossings) that distinguishes these states from weakly ordered or finite-size artifacts. Without such diagnostics, the central claim that quantum fluctuations leave only a reduced number of dominant incommensurate orders cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that more explicit diagnostics will improve the characterization of the highly frustrated regions. Our identification currently rests on the absence of sharp magnetic Bragg peaks in the structure factor together with energy comparisons across competing orders. In the revised version we will add entanglement spectra for selected points in these regions and Binder-ratio analysis (where system sizes permit) to better distinguish potential spin-liquid or weakly ordered behavior from finite-size artifacts. These enhancements will reinforce the claim of a reduced set of dominant incommensurate orders while clarifying the nature of the frustrated areas. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity in numerical phase-diagram construction.

full rationale

The paper reports classical and quantum numerical results for the Kitaev-Heisenberg-Γ model phase diagram. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the suppression of classical orders and identification of frustrated regions are direct outputs of the simulations (DMRG, ED, etc.) rather than algebraic identities or renamed inputs. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no information on free parameters, background axioms, or new postulated entities.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Phase diagram of the Kitaev-Heisenberg-$\Gamma$ model: Classical and quantum magnetism, frustration, and subdominant interactions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VRCIMRDK

@misc{pith2026260613263,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Phase diagram of the Kitaev-Heisenberg-$\Gamma$ model: Classical and quantum magnetism, frustration, and subdominant interactions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VRCIMRDK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.13263}
}
abstract

The Kitaev spin liquid provides a rare example of exactly solvable quantum spin liquid states. Intensive research over the past two decades has identified a variety of its candidate materials. In real materials, however, the Kitaev interaction is inevitably accompanied by additional magnetic interactions such as the Heisenberg and $\Gamma$ interactions. These interactions often induce magnetic ordering at low temperatures, making it essential to clarify their effects in the search for and design of Kitaev spin liquid candidate materials. In this study, we revisit the ground-state phase diagram of the Kitaev-Heisenberg-$\Gamma$ model from both classical and quantum perspectives, using state-of-the-art numerical techniques. In the classical case, we reveal a $zoo$ $of$ $noncollinear$ $orders$, where a variety of noncollinear multiple-$Q$ magnetic orders with and without incommensurate modulations emerge. In the quantum case, we unravel that quantum fluctuations suppress many of the competing orders found in the classical case, resulting in a reduced number of dominant incommensurate orders. We further identify $highly$ $frustrated$ regions, where spiral spin liquid states as well as new magnetically ordered states are potentially stabilized by other additional magnetic interactions. Our results provide a comprehensive perspective on the Kitaev-Heisenberg-$\Gamma$ model for both classical and quantum spins and offer a valuable guide not only for interpreting experimental results on candidate materials, but also for searching and designing new materials to realize the Kitaev spin liquid.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.13263 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Ground-state phase diagrams of the Kitaev-Heisenberg- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Enlarged view of the lower quadrant of Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Second-order derivative, (b) absolute value of the total [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Critical cutoff energy scale [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Typical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Schematic illustration of the three-step optimization procedure used in the classical spin calculations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Distribution of the three eigenvalues (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

141 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    B. Zeng, X. Chen, D.-L. Zhou, and X.-G. Wen,Quantum In- formation Meets Quantum Matter(Springer New York, 2019)

    2019

  2. [2]

    Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insu- lator?, Mater

    P. Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insu- lator?, Mater. Res. Bull.8, 153 (1973)

    1973

  3. [3]

    Fazekas and P

    P. Fazekas and P. W. Anderson, On the ground state properties of the anisotropic triangular antiferromagnet, Philos. Mag.30, 423 (1974)

    1974

  4. [4]

    Jackeli and G

    G. Jackeli and G. Khaliullin, Mott Insulators in the Strong Spin-Orbit Coupling Limit: From Heisenberg to a Quantum Compass and Kitaev Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 017205 (2009)

    2009

  5. [5]

    hK/dehKTBGXCnmEeuJxpfpwQYpU=

    J. G. Rau, E. K.-H. Lee, and H.-Y . Kee, Spin-Orbit Physics Giving Rise to Novel Phases in Correlated Systems: Iridates 14 <latexit sha1_base64="hK/dehKTBGXCnmEeuJxpfpwQYpU=">AAAC1nicfVE9LwRRFD3G9/ei1IgNWYls3ioQldAoLZZN2MjMeNbE7MxkZnaDDZ2oJCpbqEgU4mdo/AGFSi1KSoUzb0eB2Dd579177rn3vjnX8GwrCIV4btKaW1rb2js6u7p7evv6EwOD64Fb9k2ZM13b9fOGHkjbcmQutEJb5j1f6iXDlhvG/m...

    2016

  6. [6]

    S. M. Winter, A. A. Tsirlin, M. Daghofer, J. van den Brink, Y . Singh, P. Gegenwart, and R. Valent´ı, Models and materials for generalized Kitaev magnetism, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 493002 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    Takagi, T

    H. Takagi, T. Takayama, G. Jackeli, G. Khaliullin, and S. E. Nagler, Concept and realization of Kitaev quantum spin liq- uids, Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 264 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    Motome, R

    Y . Motome, R. Sano, S. Jang, Y . Sugita, and Y . Kato, Materi- als design of Kitaev spin liquids beyond the Jackeli-Khaliullin mechanism, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter32, 404001 (2020)

    2020

Show all 141 references
  1. [9]

    Trebst and C

    S. Trebst and C. Hickey, Kitaev materials, Phys. Rep.950, 1 (2022). 15

    2022

  2. [10]

    Kim, H.-S

    C. Kim, H.-S. Kim, and J.-G. Park, Spin-orbital entangled state and realization of Kitaev physics in3dcobalt com- pounds: a progress report, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter34, 023001 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Rousochatzakis, N

    I. Rousochatzakis, N. B. Perkins, Q. Luo, and H.-Y . Kee, Be- yond Kitaev physics in strong spin-orbit coupled magnets, Rep. Prog. Phys.87, 026502 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    V . O. Garlea and C. L. Sarkis, Review of honeycomb- based Kitaev materials with zigzag magnetic ordering, arXiv:2410.11083

  5. [13]

    Matsuda, T

    Y . Matsuda, T. Shibauchi, and H.-Y . Kee, Kitaev quantum spin liquids, Rev. Mod. Phys.97, 045003 (2025)

    2025

  6. [14]

    Ojeda-Aristizabalet al., Lessons fromα−RuCl 3 for pur- suing quantum spin liquid physics in atomically thin materials, arXiv:2511.13838

    C. Ojeda-Aristizabalet al., Lessons fromα−RuCl 3 for pur- suing quantum spin liquid physics in atomically thin materials, arXiv:2511.13838

  7. [15]

    Chaloupka, G

    J. Chaloupka, G. Jackeli, and G. Khaliullin, Kitaev- Heisenberg Model on a Honeycomb Lattice: Possible Ex- otic Phases in Iridium OxidesA 2IrO3, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 027204 (2010)

    2010

  8. [16]

    Singh and P

    Y . Singh and P. Gegenwart, Antiferromagnetic Mott insulat- ing state in single crystals of the honeycomb lattice material Na2IrO3, Phys. Rev. B82, 064412 (2010)

    2010

  9. [17]

    Singh, S

    Y . Singh, S. Manni, J. Reuther, T. Berlijn, R. Thomale, W. Ku, S. Trebst, and P. Gegenwart, Relevance of the Heisenberg- Kitaev Model for the Honeycomb Lattice IridatesA 2IrO3, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 127203 (2012)

    2012

  10. [18]

    Comin, G

    R. Comin, G. Levy, B. Ludbrook, Z.-H. Zhu, C. N. Veenstra, J. A. Rosen, Y . Singh, P. Gegenwart, D. Stricker, J. N. Han- cock, D. van der Marel, I. S. Elfimov, and A. Damascelli, Na2IrO3 as a Novel Relativistic Mott Insulator with a 340- meV Gap, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 266406 (2012)

    2012

  11. [19]

    Chaloupka, G

    J. Chaloupka, G. Jackeli, and G. Khaliullin, Zigzag Magnetic Order in the Iridium OxideNa 2IrO3, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 097204 (2013)

    2013

  12. [20]

    Foyevtsova, H

    K. Foyevtsova, H. O. Jeschke, I. I. Mazin, D. I. Khomskii, and R. Valent´ı, Ab initio analysis of the tight-binding param- eters and magnetic interactions in Na 2IrO3, Phys. Rev. B88, 035107 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    C. H. Sohn, H.-S. Kim, T. F. Qi, D. W. Jeong, H. J. Park, H. K. Yoo, H. H. Kim, J.-Y . Kim, T. D. Kang, D.-Y . Cho, G. Cao, J. Yu, S. J. Moon, and T. W. Noh, Mixing between Jeff = 1 2 and 3 2 orbitals in Na 2IrO3: A spectroscopic and density functional calculation study, Phys....

    2013

  14. [22]

    V . M. Katukuri, S. Nishimoto, V . Yushankhai, A. Stoyanova, H. Kandpal, S. Choi, R. Coldea, I. Rousochatzakis, L. Hozoi, and J. van den Brink, Kitaev interactions betweenj= 1/2 moments in honeycomb Na2IrO3 are large and ferromagnetic: insights fromab initioquantum chemistry c...

    2014

  15. [23]

    Yamaji, Y

    Y . Yamaji, Y . Nomura, M. Kurita, R. Arita, and M. Imada, First-Principles Study of the Honeycomb-Lattice Iridates Na2IrO3 in the Presence of Strong Spin-Orbit Interaction and Electron Correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 107201 (2014)

    2014

  16. [24]

    Hwan Chun, J.-W

    S. Hwan Chun, J.-W. Kim, J. Kim, H. Zheng, C. C. Stoumpos, C. D. Malliakas, J. F. Mitchell, K. Mehlawat, Y . Singh, Y . Choi, T. Gog, A. Al-Zein, M. M. Sala, M. Krisch, J. Chaloupka, G. Jackeli, G. Khaliullin, and B. J. Kim, Di- rect evidence for dominant bond-directional inte...

    2015

  17. [25]

    S. M. Winter, Y . Li, H. O. Jeschke, and R. Valent´ı, Challenges in design of Kitaev materials: Magnetic interactions from competing energy scales, Phys. Rev. B93, 214431 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    S. C. Williams, R. D. Johnson, F. Freund, S. Choi, A. Jesche, I. Kimchi, S. Manni, A. Bombardi, P. Manuel, P. Gegenwart, and R. Coldea, Incommensurate counterrotating magnetic or- der stabilized by Kitaev interactions in the layered honeycomb α−Li2IrO3, Phys. Rev. B93, 195158 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    K. W. Plumb, J. P. Clancy, L. J. Sandilands, V . V . Shankar, Y . F. Hu, K. S. Burch, H.-Y . Kee, and Y .-J. Kim,α−RuCl3: A spin-orbit assisted Mott insulator on a honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B90, 041112 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    H.-S. Kim, V . S. V ., A. Catuneanu, and H.-Y . Kee, Kitaev mag- netism in honeycomb RuCl3 with intermediate spin-orbit cou- pling, Phys. Rev. B91, 241110(R) (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    Kubota, H

    Y . Kubota, H. Tanaka, T. Ono, Y . Narumi, and K. Kindo, Suc- cessive magnetic phase transitions inα−RuCl 3: XY-like frustrated magnet on the honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B91, 094422 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    Yadav, N

    R. Yadav, N. A. Bogdanov, V . M. Katukuri, S. Nishimoto, J. van den Brink, and L. Hozoi, Kitaev exchange and field- induced quantum spin-liquid states in honeycombα-RuCl 3, Sci. Rep.6, 37925 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    Banerjee, C

    A. Banerjee, C. A. Bridges, J.-Q. Yan, A. A. Aczel, L. Li, M. B. Stone, G. E. Granroth, M. D. Lumsden, Y . Yiu, J. Knolle, S. Bhattacharjee, D. L. Kovrizhin, R. Moessner, D. A. Tennant, D. G. Mandrus, and S. E. Nagler, Proximate Kitaev quantum spin liquid behaviour in a honeyc...

    2016

  24. [32]

    S. Sinn, C. H. Kim, B. H. Kim, K. D. Lee, C. J. Won, J. S. Oh, M. Han, Y . J. Chang, N. Hur, H. Sato, B.-G. Park, C. Kim, H.-D. Kim, and T. W. Noh, Electronic Structure of the Kitaev Materialα-RuCl 3 Probed by Photoemission and Inverse Pho- toemission Spectroscopies, Sci. Rep....

    2016

  25. [33]

    S. Kim, B. Yuan, and Y .-J. Kim, ¡i¿α¡/i¿-RuCl3 and other Kitaev materials, APL Materials10(2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    M ¨oller, P

    M. M ¨oller, P. A. Maksimov, S. Jiang, S. R. White, R. Va- lent´ı, and A. L. Chernyshev, Rethinkingα−RuCl 3: Param- eters, models, and phase diagram, Phys. Rev. B112, 104403 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    Kasahara, T

    Y . Kasahara, T. Ohnishi, Y . Mizukami, O. Tanaka, S. Ma, K. Sugii, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, J. Nasu, Y . Motome, T. Shibauchi, and Y . Matsuda, Majorana quantization and half- integer thermal quantum Hall effect in a Kitaev spin liquid, Nature559, 227 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    Yamashita, J

    M. Yamashita, J. Gouchi, Y . Uwatoko, N. Kurita, and H. Tanaka, Sample dependence of half-integer quantized ther- mal Hall effect in the Kitaev spin-liquid candidateα−RuCl 3, Phys. Rev. B102, 220404(R) (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Yokoi, S

    T. Yokoi, S. Ma, Y . Kasahara, S. Kasahara, T. Shibauchi, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, J. Nasu, Y . Motome, C. Hickey, S. Trebst, and Y . Matsuda, Half-integer quantized anomalous thermal Hall effect in the Kitaev material candidateα-RuCl 3, Science373, 568 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    J. A. N. Bruin, R. R. Claus, Y . Matsumoto, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, and H. Takagi, Robustness of the thermal Hall ef- fect close to half-quantization inα-RuCl 3, Nat. Phys.18, 401 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Kasahara, S

    Y . Kasahara, S. Suetsugu, T. Asaba, S. Kasahara, T. Shibauchi, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, and Y . Matsuda, Quantized and unquan- tized thermal Hall conductance of the Kitaev spin liquid can- didateα−RuCl 3, Phys. Rev. B106, L060410 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Imamura, S

    K. Imamura, S. Suetsugu, Y . Mizukami, Y . Yoshida, K. Hashimoto, K. Ohtsuka, Y . Kasahara, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, P. Noh, J. Nasu, E.-G. Moon, Y . Matsuda, and T. Shibauchi, Majorana-fermion origin of the planar thermal Hall effect in the Kitaev magnetα-RuCl 3, Sci. Adv.10(2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Tanaka, Y

    O. Tanaka, Y . Mizukami, R. Harasawa, K. Hashimoto, 16 K. Hwang, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, S. Fujimoto, Y . Matsuda, E.-G. Moon, and T. Shibauchi, Thermodynamic evidence for a field-angle-dependent Majorana gap in a Kitaev spin liquid, Nat. Phys.18, 429 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Imamura, R

    K. Imamura, R. Namba, R. Ishioka, K. Ishihara, Y . Matsuda, S. Lee, E.-G. Moon, K. Hashimoto, and T. Shibauchi, Bulk excitations in ultracleanα−RuCl 3: Quantitative evidence for Majorana dispersions in a Kitaev quantum spin liquid, Phys. Rev. B111, 184440 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    Liu and G

    H. Liu and G. Khaliullin, Pseudospin exchange interactions ind 7 cobalt compounds: Possible realization of the Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. B97, 014407 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    R. Sano, Y . Kato, and Y . Motome, Kitaev-Heisenberg Hamil- tonian for high-spind 7 Mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B97, 014408 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    J.-Q. Yan, S. Okamoto, Y . Wu, Q. Zheng, H. D. Zhou, H. B. Cao, and M. A. McGuire, Magnetic order in single crystals of Na3Co2SbO6 with a honeycomb arrangement of3d 7 Co2+ ions, Phys. Rev. Mater.3, 074405 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    H. Liu, J. Chaloupka, and G. Khaliullin, Kitaev Spin Liquid in 3dTransition Metal Compounds, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 047201 (2020)

    2020

  39. [47]

    W. Chen, X. Li, Z. Hu, Z. Hu, L. Yue, R. Sutarto, F. He, K. Iida, K. Kamazawa, W. Yu, X. Lin, and Y . Li, Spin-orbit phase behavior ofNa 2Co2TeO6 at low temperatures, Phys. Rev. B103, L180404 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    X. Hong, M. Gillig, R. Hentrich, W. Yao, V . Kocsis, A. R. Witte, T. Schreiner, D. Baumann, N. P ´erez, A. U. B. Wolter, Y . Li, B. B ¨uchner, and C. Hess, Strongly scattered phonon heat transport of the candidate Kitaev materialNa2Co2TeO6, Phys. Rev. B104, 144426 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    G. Lin, J. Jeong, C. Kim, Y . Wang, Q. Huang, T. Masuda, S. Asai, S. Itoh, G. G ¨unther, M. Russina, Z. Lu, J. Sheng, L. Wang, J. Wang, G. Wang, Q. Ren, C. Xi, W. Tong, L. Ling, Z. Liu, L. Wu, J. Mei, Z. Qu, H. Zhou, X. Wang, J.-G. Park, Y . Wan, and J. Ma, Field-induced quant...

    2021

  42. [50]

    A. M. Samarakoon, Q. Chen, H. Zhou, and V . O. Garlea, Static and dynamic magnetic properties of honeycomb lattice anti- ferromagnetsNa 2M2TeO6,M= Coand Ni, Phys. Rev. B 104, 184415 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    C. Kim, J. Jeong, G. Lin, P. Park, T. Masuda, S. Asai, S. Itoh, H.-S. Kim, H. Zhou, J. Ma, and J.-G. Park, Antiferromagnetic Kitaev interaction inJ eff = 1/2cobalt honeycomb materials Na3Co2SbO6 and Na 2Co2TeO6, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 34, 045802 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    X. Li, Y . Gu, Y . Chen, V . O. Garlea, K. Iida, K. Kamazawa, Y . Li, G. Deng, Q. Xiao, X. Zheng, Z. Ye, Y . Peng, I. A. Za- liznyak, J. M. Tranquada, and Y . Li, Giant Magnetic In-Plane Anisotropy and Competing Instabilities inNa 3Co2SbO6, Phys. Rev. X12, 041024 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y . Xu, T. Halloran, R. Zhong, C. Broholm, R. J. Cava, N. Drichko, and N. P. Armitage, A magnetic continuum in the cobalt-based honeycomb magnet BaCo 2(AsO4)2, Nat. Mater.22, 58 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    Halloran, F

    T. Halloran, F. Desrochers, E. Z. Zhang, T. Chen, L. E. Chern, Z. Xu, B. Winn, M. Graves-Brook, M. B. Stone, A. I. Kolesnikov, Y . Qiu, R. Zhong, R. Cava, Y . B. Kim, and C. Bro- holm, Geometrical frustration versus Kitaev interactions in BaCo2(AsO4)2, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.120(2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    X. Xu, L. Wu, Y . Zhu, and R. J. Cava,K2Co2TeO6: A layered magnet with aS= 1 2 Co2+ honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B 108, 174432 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    W. Yao, Y . Zhao, Y . Qiu, C. Balz, J. R. Stewart, J. W. Lynn, and Y . Li, Magnetic ground state of the KitaevNa2Co2TeO6 spin liquid candidate, Phys. Rev. Res.5, L022045 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    Haraguchi, Y

    Y . Haraguchi, Y . Yoshida, A. Matsuo, K. Kindo, and H. A. Katori,CaCo 2TeO6: A topochemically prepared3d 7 honey- comb Kitaev magnet, Phys. Rev. B110, 184411 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    P. A. Maksimov, S. Jiang, L. P. Regnault, and A. L. Cherny- shev, Strong Kitaev Interaction in BaCo2(AsO4)2, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 066703 (2025)

    2025

  51. [59]

    Haraguchi, C

    Y . Haraguchi, C. Michioka, A. Matsuo, K. Kindo, H. Ueda, and K. Yoshimura, Magnetic ordering with an XY-like anisotropy in the honeycomb lattice iridatesZnIrO 3 and MgIrO3 synthesized via a metathesis reaction, Phys. Rev. Mater.2, 054411 (2018)

    2018

  52. [60]

    Haraguchi and H

    Y . Haraguchi and H. A. Katori, Strong antiferromagnetic in- teraction owing to a large trigonal distortion in the spin-orbit- coupled honeycomb lattice iridateCdIrO 3, Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 044401 (2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    Jang and Y

    S.-H. Jang and Y . Motome, Electronic and magnetic properties of iridium ilmenitesAIrO 3 (A= Mg,Zn, andMn), Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 104409 (2021)

    2021

  54. [62]

    S.-H. Jang, R. Sano, Y . Kato, and Y . Motome, Antiferromag- netic Kitaev interaction inf-electron based honeycomb mag- nets, Phys. Rev. B99, 241106 (2019)

    2019

  55. [63]

    S.-H. Jang, R. Sano, Y . Kato, and Y . Motome, Computational design off-electron Kitaev magnets: Honeycomb and hyper- honeycomb compoundsA 2PrO3 (A=alkali metals), Phys. Rev. Mater.4, 104420 (2020)

    2020

  56. [64]

    J. Xing, E. Feng, Y . Liu, E. Emmanouilidou, C. Hu, J. Liu, D. Graf, A. P. Ramirez, G. Chen, H. Cao, and N. Ni, N ´eel- type antiferromagnetic order and magnetic field–temperature phase diagram in the spin- 1 2 rare-earth honeycomb compound YbCl3, Phys. Rev. B102, 014427 (2020)

    2020

  57. [65]

    Ramanathan, J

    A. Ramanathan, J. E. Leisen, and H. S. La Pierre, In-Plane Cation Ordering and Sodium Displacements in Layered Hon- eycomb Oxides with Tetravalent Lanthanides: Na2LnO3 (Ln = Ce, Pr, and Tb), Inorg. Chem.60, 1398 (2021)

    2021

  58. [66]

    M. J. Daum, A. Ramanathan, A. I. Kolesnikov, S. Calder, M. Mourigal, and H. S. La Pierre, Collective excitations in the tetravalent lanthanide honeycomb antiferromagnetNa 2PrO3, Phys. Rev. B103, L121109 (2021)

    2021

  59. [67]

    Ishikawa, R

    H. Ishikawa, R. Kurihara, T. Yajima, D. Nishio-Hamane, Y . Shimizu, T. Sakakibara, A. Matsuo, and K. Kindo, SmI3 : 4f 5 honeycomb magnet with spin-orbital entangled Γ7 Kramers doublet, Phys. Rev. Mater.6, 064405 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    Jang and Y

    S.-H. Jang and Y . Motome, Exploring rare-earth Kitaev magnets by massive-scale computational analysis, Commun. Mater.5(2024)

    2024

  61. [69]

    Okuma, K

    R. Okuma, K. MacFarquharson, and R. Coldea, Selective Syn- thesis and Crystal Chemistry of Candidate Rare-Earth Kitaev Materials: Honeycomb and Hyperhoneycomb Na 2PrO3, In- org. Chem.63, 15941 (2024)

    2024

  62. [70]

    Salavati, N

    M. Salavati, N. Alajlan, and T. Rabczuk, Super-stretchability in two-dimensional RuCl 3 and RuBr 3 confirmed by first- principles simulations, Physica E: Low Dimens. Syst. Nanos- truct.113, 79 (2019)

    2019

  63. [71]

    D. Ni, X. Gui, K. M. Powderly, and R. J. Cava, Honeycomb- Structure RuI 3, A New Quantum Material Related toα- RuCl3, Advanced Materials34, 2106831 (2022)

    2022

  64. [72]

    K. Nawa, Y . Imai, Y . Yamaji, H. Fujihara, W. Yamada, R. Takahashi, T. Hiraoka, M. Hagihala, S. Torii, T. Aoyama, T. Ohashi, Y . Shimizu, H. Gotou, M. Itoh, K. Ohgushi, and T. J. Sato, Strongly Electron-Correlated Semimetal RuI3 with a Layered Honeycomb Structure, J. Phys. So...

    2021

  65. [73]

    Y . Imai, K. Nawa, Y . Shimizu, W. Yamada, H. Fujihara, T. Aoyama, R. Takahashi, D. Okuyama, T. Ohashi, M. Hag- ihala, S. Torii, D. Morikawa, M. Terauchi, T. Kawamata, M. Kato, H. Gotou, M. Itoh, T. J. Sato, and K. Ohgushi, Zigzag magnetic order in the Kitaev spin-liquid candi...

    2022

  66. [74]

    Samanta, D

    S. Samanta, D. Hong, and H.-S. Kim, Electronic Structures of Kitaev Magnet Candidates RuCl3 and RuI3, Nanomater.14, 9 (2023)

    2023

  67. [75]

    Zhanget al., High Quality Single Crystal of Kitaev Spin Liquid Candidate Material RuBr3 Synthesized under High Pressure, arXiv:2502.11479

    B. Zhanget al., High Quality Single Crystal of Kitaev Spin Liquid Candidate Material RuBr3 Synthesized under High Pressure, arXiv:2502.11479

  68. [76]

    K. Nawa, Y . Imai, M. Kofu, R. Mole, H. Fujihara, T. Hiraoka, R. Murasaki, P. Piyawongwatthana, D. Okuyama, H. Gotou, K. Ohgushi, and T. J. Sato, Magnetic excitations of the Kitaev model candidate RuBr3, npj Quantum Mater.11(2026)

    2026

  69. [77]

    Gretarssonet al., Three-dimensional zigzag correlations in the van der Waals Kitaev magnet RuBr3, arXiv:2604.05346

    H. Gretarssonet al., Three-dimensional zigzag correlations in the van der Waals Kitaev magnet RuBr3, arXiv:2604.05346

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    P. P. Stavropoulos, D. Pereira, and H.-Y . Kee, Microscopic Mechanism for a Higher-Spin Kitaev Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 037203 (2019)

    2019

  71. [79]

    M. Kim, P. Kumaravadivel, J. Birkbeck, W. Kuang, S. G. Xu, D. G. Hopkinson, J. Knolle, P. A. McClarty, A. I. Berdyugin, M. Ben Shalom, R. V . Gorbachev, S. J. Haigh, S. Liu, J. H. Edgar, K. S. Novoselov, I. V . Grigorieva, and A. K. Geim, Micromagnetometry of two-dimensional f...

    2019

  72. [80]

    C. Xu, J. Feng, H. Xiang, and L. Bellaiche, Interplay be- tween Kitaev interaction and single ion anisotropy in ferro- magnetic CrI3 and CrGeTe3 monolayers, npj Comput. Mater. 4, 57 (2018)

    2018

  73. [81]

    I. Lee, F. G. Utermohlen, D. Weber, K. Hwang, C. Zhang, J. van Tol, J. E. Goldberger, N. Trivedi, and P. C. Ham- mel, Fundamental Spin Interactions Underlying the Magnetic Anisotropy in the Kitaev Ferromagnet CrI 3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 017201 (2020)

    2020

  74. [82]

    P. P. Stavropoulos, X. Liu, and H.-Y . Kee, Magnetic anisotropy in spin-3/2 with heavy ligand in honeycomb Mott insulators: Application toCrI 3, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 013216 (2021)

    2021

  75. [83]

    C. Xu, J. Feng, M. Kawamura, Y . Yamaji, Y . Nahas, S. Prokhorenko, Y . Qi, H. Xiang, and L. Bellaiche, Possi- ble Kitaev Quantum Spin Liquid State in 2D Materials with S= 3/2, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 087205 (2020)

    2020

  76. [84]

    Fukui, Y

    K. Fukui, Y . Kato, J. Nasu, and Y . Motome, Ground-state phase diagram of spin-SKitaev-Heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. B106, 174416 (2022)

    2022

  77. [85]

    J. G. Rau, E. K.-H. Lee, and H.-Y . Kee, Generic Spin Model for the Honeycomb Iridates beyond the Kitaev Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 077204 (2014)

    2014

  78. [86]

    J. G. Rau and H.-Y . Kee, Trigonal distortion in the honeycomb iridates: Proximity of zigzag and spiral phases in Na 2IrO3, arXiv:1408.4811

    arXiv

  79. [87]

    J. Lou, L. Liang, Y . Yu, and Y . Chen, Global Phase Diagram of the Extended Kitaev-Heisenberg Model on Honeycomb Lat- tice, arXiv:1501.06990

    arXiv

  80. [88]

    Rusna ˇcko, D

    J. Rusna ˇcko, D. Gotfryd, and J. Chaloupka, Kitaev-like honey- comb magnets: Global phase behavior and emergent effective models, Phys. Rev. B99, 064425 (2019)

    2019

  81. [89]

    Pohle, N

    R. Pohle, N. Shannon, and Y . Motome, Spin nematics meet spin liquids: Exotic quantum phases in the spin-1 bilinear- biquadratic model with Kitaev interactions, Phys. Rev. B107, L140403 (2023)

    2023

  82. [90]

    Pohle, N

    R. Pohle, N. Shannon, and Y . Motome, Eight-color chiral spin liquid in theS= 1bilinear-biquadratic model with Kitaev interactions, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033077 (2024)

    2024

  83. [91]

    Ikegami, K

    S. Ikegami, K. Fukui, R. Pohle, and Y . Motome, Kitaev meets Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki: Competing quantum disorder in spin-3/2 honeycomb systems, Phys. Rev. B113, 144433 (2026)

    2026

  84. [92]

    Reuther and P

    J. Reuther and P. W ¨olfle,J 1−J2 frustrated two-dimensional heisenberg model: Random phase approximation and func- tional renormalization group, Phys. Rev. B81, 144410 (2010)

    2010

  85. [93]

    F. L. Buessen, V . Noculak, S. Trebst, and J. Reuther, Func- tional renormalization group for frustrated magnets with non- diagonal spin interactions, Phys. Rev. B100, 125164 (2019)

    2019

  86. [94]

    M ¨uller, D

    T. M ¨uller, D. Kiese, N. Niggemann, B. Sbierski, J. Reuther, S. Trebst, R. Thomale, and Y . Iqbal, Pseudo-fermion func- tional renormalization group for spin models, Rep. Prog. Phys. 87, 036501 (2024)

    2024

  87. [95]

    Chaloupka and G

    J. Chaloupka and G. Khaliullin, Hidden symmetries of the extended Kitaev-Heisenberg model: Implications for the honeycomb-lattice iridatesA 2IrO3, Phys. Rev. B92, 024413 (2015)

    2015

  88. [96]

    Kimchi and Y .-Z

    I. Kimchi and Y .-Z. You, Kitaev-heisenberg-J2-J3 model for the iridatesA 2iro3, Phys. Rev. B84, 180407(R) (2011)

    2011

  89. [97]

    Sizyuk, C

    Y . Sizyuk, C. Price, P. W¨olfle, and N. B. Perkins, Importance of anisotropic exchange interactions in honeycomb iridates: Minimal model for zigzag antiferromagnetic order inna2iro3, Phys. Rev. B90, 155126 (2014)

    2014

  90. [98]

    C. C. Price and N. B. Perkins, Critical Properties of the Kitaev- Heisenberg Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 187201 (2012)

    2012

  91. [99]

    Price and N

    C. Price and N. B. Perkins, Finite-temperature phase diagram of the classical Kitaev-Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. B88, 024410 (2013)

    2013

  92. [100]

    Jiang, Z.-c

    H.-c. Jiang, Z.-c. Gu, X.-l. Qi, and S. Trebst, Possible prox- imity of the Mott insulating iridate Na 2IrO3 to a topological phase: Phase diagram of the Heisenberg-Kitaev model in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B83, 245104 (2011)

    2011

  93. [101]

    Schaffer, S

    R. Schaffer, S. Bhattacharjee, and Y . B. Kim, Quantum phase transition in Heisenberg-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. B86, 224417 (2012)

    2012

  94. [102]

    Osorio Iregui, P

    J. Osorio Iregui, P. Corboz, and M. Troyer, Probing the stabil- ity of the spin-liquid phases in the Kitaev-Heisenberg model using tensor network algorithms, Phys. Rev. B90, 195102 (2014)

    2014

  95. [103]

    Gotfryd, J

    D. Gotfryd, J. Rusna ˇcko, K. Wohlfeld, G. Jackeli, J. Chaloupka, and A. M. Ole´s, Phase diagram and spin correla- tions of the Kitaev-Heisenberg model: Importance of quantum effects, Phys. Rev. B95, 024426 (2017)

    2017

  96. [104]

    R. R. P. Singh and J. Oitmaa, High-temperature thermody- namics of the honeycomb-lattice Kitaev-Heisenberg model: A high-temperature series expansion study, Phys. Rev. B96, 144414 (2017)

    2017

  97. [105]

    Sato and F

    T. Sato and F. F. Assaad, Quantum Monte Carlo simulation of generalized Kitaev models, Phys. Rev. B104, L081106 (2021)

    2021

  98. [106]

    Reuther, R

    J. Reuther, R. Thomale, and S. Trebst, Finite-temperature phase diagram of the Heisenberg-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. B 84, 100406(R) (2011)

    2011

  99. [107]

    L. E. Chern, R. Kaneko, H.-Y . Lee, and Y . B. Kim, Magnetic field induced competing phases in spin-orbital entangled Ki- taev magnets, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013014 (2020)

    2020

  100. [108]

    K. Liu, N. Sadoune, N. Rao, J. Greitemann, and L. Pollet, Revealing the phase diagram of Kitaev materials by machine learning: Cooperation and competition between spin liquids, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023016 (2021). 18

    2021

  101. [109]

    Rayyan, Q

    A. Rayyan, Q. Luo, and H.-Y . Kee, Extent of frustration in the classical Kitaev-Γmodel via bond anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B 104, 094431 (2021)

    2021

  102. [110]

    K. Chen, Q. Luo, Z. Zhou, S. He, B. Xi, C. Jia, H.-G. Luo, and J. Zhao, Triple-meron crystal in high-spin Kitaev magnets, New J. Phys.25, 023006 (2023)

    2023

  103. [111]

    P. P. Stavropoulos, Y . Yang, I. Rousochatzakis, and N. B. Perkins, Complex orders and chirality in the classical Kitaev- Γmodel, Phys. Rev. B110, 214406 (2024)

    2024

  104. [112]

    Yamada, T

    T. Yamada, T. Suzuki, and S.-i. Suga, Ground-state properties of theK−Γmodel on a honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B102, 024415 (2020)

    2020

  105. [113]

    I. Rousochatzakis, The spin-1/2 K-ΓHoneycomb Model: Semiclassical, strong coupling and exact diagonalization re- sults, KITP Program: Correlated Systems with Multicompo- nent Local Hilbert Spaces (2020)

    2020

  106. [114]

    Gohlke, G

    M. Gohlke, G. Wachtel, Y . Yamaji, F. Pollmann, and Y . B. Kim, Quantum spin liquid signatures in Kitaev-like frustrated magnets, Phys. Rev. B97, 075126 (2018)

    2018

  107. [115]

    J. S. Gordon, A. Catuneanu, E. S. Sørensen, and H.-Y . Kee, Theory of the field-revealed Kitaev spin liquid, Nature Com- munications10, 10.1038/s41467-019-10405-8 (2019)

    2019 doi

  108. [116]

    Gohlke, L

    M. Gohlke, L. E. Chern, H.-Y . Kee, and Y . B. Kim, Emer- gence of nematic paramagnet via quantum order-by-disorder and pseudo-Goldstone modes in Kitaev magnets, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043023 (2020)

    2020

  109. [117]

    H.-Y . Lee, R. Kaneko, L. E. Chern, T. Okubo, Y . Yamaji, N. Kawashima, and Y . B. Kim, Magnetic field induced quan- tum phases in a tensor network study of Kitaev magnets, Nat. Commun.11(2020)

    2020

  110. [118]

    F. L. Buessen and Y . B. Kim, Functional renormalization group study of the Kitaev-Γmodel on the honeycomb lattice and emergent incommensurate magnetic correlations, Phys. Rev. B103, 184407 (2021)

    2021

  111. [119]

    J. M. Luttinger and L. Tisza, Theory of Dipole Interaction in Crystals, Phys. Rev.70, 954 (1946)

    1946

  112. [120]

    D. B. Litvin, The Luttinger-Tisza method, Physica77, 205 (1974)

    1974

  113. [121]

    J. Wang, B. Normand, and Z.-X. Liu, One Proximate Kitaev Spin Liquid in theK−J−ΓModel on the Honeycomb Lat- tice, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 197201 (2019)

    2019

  114. [122]

    Bradbury, R

    J. Bradbury, R. Frostig, P. Hawkins, M. J. Johnson, Y . Katariya, C. Leary, D. Maclaurin, G. Necula, A. Paszke, J. VanderPlas, S. Wanderman-Milne, and Q. Zhang, JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs (2018)

    2018

  115. [123]

    Babuschkin, K

    DeepMind, I. Babuschkin, K. Baumli, A. Bell, S. Bhupatiraju, J. Bruce, P. Buchlovsky, D. Budden, T. Cai, A. Clark, I. Dani- helka, A. Dedieu, C. Fantacci, J. Godwin, C. Jones, R. Hems- ley, T. Hennigan, M. Hessel, S. Hou, S. Kapturowski, T. Keck, I. Kemaev, M. King, M. Kunesch...

    2020

  116. [124]

    D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, Adam: A Method for Stochastic Op- timization, International Conference on Learning Representa- tions, arXiv:2206.08946

  117. [125]

    A. A. Abrikosov, Electron scattering on magnetic impurities in metals and anomalous resistivity effects, Phys. Phys. Fiz.2, 5 (1965)

    1965

  118. [126]

    V . N. Popov and S. A. Fedotov, The functional integration method and diagram technique for spin systems, Sov. Phys. JETP67, 535 (1988)

    1988

  119. [127]

    Salmhofer,Renormalization(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999)

    M. Salmhofer,Renormalization(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999)

    1999

  120. [128]

    Salmhofer and C

    M. Salmhofer and C. Honerkamp, Fermionic Renormalization Group Flows: Technique and Theory, Prog. Theor. Phys.105, 1 (2001)

    2001

  121. [129]

    Kopietz, L

    P. Kopietz, L. Bartosch, and F. Sch ¨utz,Introduction to the Functional Renormalization Group(Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, 2010)

    2010

  122. [130]

    Metzner, M

    W. Metzner, M. Salmhofer, C. Honerkamp, V . Meden, and K. Sch¨onhammer, Functional renormalization group approach to correlated fermion systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 299 (2012)

    2012

  123. [131]

    A. A. Katanin, Fulfillment of Ward identities in the functional renormalization group approach, Phys. Rev. B70, 115109 (2004)

    2004

  124. [132]

    Iqbal, R

    Y . Iqbal, R. Thomale, F. Parisen Toldin, S. Rachel, and J. Reuther, Functional renormalization group for three- dimensional quantum magnetism, Phys. Rev. B94, 140408(R) (2016)

    2016

  125. [133]

    F. L. Buessen and S. Trebst, Competing magnetic orders and spin liquids in two- and three-dimensional kagome systems: Pseudofermion functional renormalization group perspective, Phys. Rev. B94, 235138 (2016)

    2016

  126. [134]

    S. R. Sklan and C. L. Henley, Nonplanar ground states of frus- trated antiferromagnets on an octahedral lattice, Phys. Rev. B 88, 024407 (2013)

    2013

  127. [135]

    Rousochatzakis and N

    I. Rousochatzakis and N. B. Perkins, Classical Spin Liquid Instability Driven By Off-Diagonal Exchange in Strong Spin- Orbit Magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 147204 (2017)

    2017

  128. [136]

    Bergman, J

    D. Bergman, J. Alicea, E. Gull, S. Trebst, and L. Ba- lents, Order-by-disorder and spiral spin-liquid in frustrated diamond-lattice antiferromagnets, Nat. Phys.3, 487 (2007)

    2007

  129. [137]

    X.-P. Yao, J. Q. Liu, C.-J. Huang, X. Wang, and G. Chen, Generic spiral spin liquids, Front. Phys.16(2021)

    2021

  130. [138]

    S. Gao, M. A. McGuire, Y . Liu, D. L. Abernathy, C. d. Cruz, M. Frontzek, M. B. Stone, and A. D. Christianson, Spiral Spin Liquid on a Honeycomb Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 227201 (2022)

    2022

  131. [139]

    Okumura, H

    S. Okumura, H. Kawamura, T. Okubo, and Y . Motome, Novel Spin-Liquid States in the Frustrated Heisenberg Antiferro- magnet on the Honeycomb Lattice, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.79, 114705 (2010)

    2010

  132. [140]

    M. L. Baez and J. Reuther, Numerical treatment of spin sys- tems with unrestricted spin length S : A functional renormal- ization group study, Phys. Rev. B96, 045144 (2017)

    2017

  133. [141]

    Y . Gu, X. Li, Y . Chen, K. Iida, A. Nakao, K. Munakata, V . O. Garlea, Y . Li, G. Deng, I. A. Zaliznyak, J. M. Tran- quada, and Y . Li, In-plane multi-qmagnetic ground state of Na3Co2SbO6, Phys. Rev. B109, L060410 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.