pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.13283 · v1 · pith:JQ5KXCAGnew · submitted 2026-06-11 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph · physics.comp-ph

Arch\^e, an orbital-free molecular dynamics code for fast production of equations of state

William Weens , Augustin Blanchet , Philippe Arnault This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 05:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph physics.comp-ph
keywords orbital-free molecular dynamicsequations of stateplasma physicsself-consistent fieldpseudopotential correctionGPU accelerationlinear scalingaluminum
0
0 comments X

The pith

Archê produces aluminum equations of state matching Abinit results using an orbital-free approach after applying an average-atom pseudopotential correction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents Archê as an orbital-free molecular dynamics code that computes electronic density via a self-consistent field method rather than direct orbital methods. It introduces two techniques to speed up the SCF iterations by up to a factor of six: using the previous timestep's density to initialize a one-center profile and mixing initial and final densities to minimize an approximate free energy. Validation against Abinit for aluminum shows that agreement in internal energy is achieved only after adding a correction from a norm-conserving pseudopotential based on an average-atom model. The code demonstrates linear computational complexity and significant speedups on GPU hardware compared to many CPUs.

Core claim

Archê implements orbital-free molecular dynamics with a self-consistent field solver for the electronic density, accelerated by timestep-based density initialization and free-energy-minimizing mixing. When a pseudopotential correction derived from an average-atom model is included, the resulting internal energies for aluminum match those from Kohn-Sham calculations in Abinit. The method scales linearly with system size and runs an order of magnitude faster on a single GPU than on 256 CPUs.

What carries the argument

The self-consistent field computation of electronic density in orbital-free MD, initialized from prior timesteps and accelerated by approximate free-energy density mixing, together with the average-atom pseudopotential correction.

If this is right

  • Equations of state for plasmas can be generated with linear scaling in number of atoms and grid points.
  • SCF convergence is accelerated by up to six times compared to standard methods.
  • Execution time decreases with increasing temperature, unlike orbital-based simulations.
  • A single GPU achieves an order-of-magnitude speedup over 256 CPUs.
  • Accurate internal energies require the added pseudopotential correction for agreement with full DFT.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach may enable simulations of larger systems or longer times in plasma physics that were previously computationally prohibitive.
  • Similar corrections might be needed or adaptable for other materials beyond aluminum.
  • The temperature dependence could lead to more efficient high-temperature plasma modeling.

Load-bearing premise

The orbital-free density functional approximation combined with the average-atom pseudopotential correction is assumed to be adequate for accurate internal energies across the relevant plasma conditions without additional material-specific parameters.

What would settle it

A direct comparison of internal energy values from Archê and Abinit for aluminum at a density and temperature where the difference exceeds the agreement shown in the paper's validation plots.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.13283 by Augustin Blanchet, Philippe Arnault, William Weens.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Scaling behavior with respect to system size, sketched as in [19]. Due to the orthogonalization of orbitals, KSDFT scaling is ∼ O(N3 ), whereas OFDFT scaling is linear ∼ O(N). via a conjugate-gradient algorithm (which, to our knowledge, is employed by all existing OFDFT codes); initialization of the electronic density us￾ing the converged density from the previous MD timestep and a density-mixing strategy … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Electronic density n and pseudo-density n˜ of aluminum at ρ0 at temperature T = 100 eV as functions of the radius r in Bohr radius a0. Consequently, the pseudopotential is consis￾tent with both the density and the temperature of the simulation. Within the average-atom frame￾work, the pressure depends only on the value of the density n at rws; it is therefore unaffected by the use of a norm-conserving pseud… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Improved convergence of the SCF cycle with respect to a naive setup (A) using a constant mixing parameter and a uniform density initialization. Setup (B) improves the mixing (Sec.2.5.2). Setup (C) improves the initialization (Sec. 2.5.1). The combination of both improvements (D) accelerates convergence by up to a factor of 6 in this typical example of aluminum at 300 eV and ρ = 4 ρ0, where 128 nuclei are p… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Flow chart of the core simulation, where the main loop consists of a single MD iteration. Each iteration requires computing the electronic density via a self-consistent field (SCF) loop given by equations (9) and (10). Newton’s algorithm guarantees that the plasma remains neutral in the simulation box, subject to the constraint in equation (5), and is performed for each SCF iteration. The number of iterati… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Example of a pressure trajectory during a dynamic molecular simulation. The average is computed after thermalization has occurred. The data acquisition phase corresponds to the colored area (roughly 80% of the total duration). in Fig.5, this must be done after a thermaliza￾tion phase, which, in our simulations, represents around 20% of the total duration of 3000 timesteps. Several system sizes were tested … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Pressure along aluminum isochores. Archê results are shown as solid lines with ’+’ markers; Abinit Extended results are shown with circles. Compression decreases from top (10ρ0) to bottom (0.1ρ0) (see Fig.7 for density values). Archê and Abinit Extended [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Flowchart detailing the algorithmic complexities of the main routines. Ni is the number of nuclei, and Ng is the number of grid points. 5.1.1. Scalability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: displays the total simulation time as a function of the number of CPU cores under typical simulation conditions, spanning various tempera￾tures and numbers of atoms. Scalability remains nearly ideal up to 512 cores, but decreases slightly beyond that point. This highlights the commu￾nication overhead affecting computation time, as 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 2 10 2 11 103 104 CPU core number Total Time(s) 5000 eV,… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Effect of system size: Total simulation time for 2000 timesteps as a function of the number Ni of aluminum atoms at a compression of 4ρ0 and temperature T ∈{100, 300, 900} eV using 256 CPU cores. ready been achieved with smaller grids (64×64× 64 = 218). Since the complexity of the dominant algorithm in this simulation is governed by the Fourier transform O(Ng log Ng), the computation time should theoretic… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Effect of density: Total simulation time for 2000 timesteps as a function of compression for 108 aluminum atoms at T ∈{100, 300, 900} eV using 256 CPU cores. CuFFT, we replaced our CPU library with NVIDIA’s single-GPU implementation, which gen￾erated most of the results presented here. Since then, we have integrated the HeFFTe library [42] using the CuFFT backend. This enables multi￾GPU execution and is m… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: GPU speedup relative to system size: Ratio of the total simulation time (2000 timesteps) on 256 CPU cores to that on 1 GPU, as a function of the number of aluminum atoms Ni at a compression of 4ρ0 and temperatures of {100, 300, 900} eV. containing four GPUs each, communications be￾tween different nodes penalize performance even further. For this reason, it is always preferable to use a single GPU when its… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present Arch\^e, an orbital-free molecular dynamics (OFMD) code designed to produce equations of state (EOS) in the plasma state. Unlike in other OFMD codes, Arch\^e uses a self-consistent field (SCF) approach to compute the electronic density. This allows us to implement two algorithms that accelerate SCF convergence by a factor of up to six. First, the density is initialized using the results from the previous MD timestep to define a one-center profile, which is then applied to the new nuclei positions. Second, the initial and final densities are mixed at each SCF iteration in a proportion that minimizes an approximate free energy. We validate the code by comparing the calculated aluminum EOS to results obtained with the Kohn-Sham density functional theory software Abinit. Achieving agreement in the internal energy requires adding a correction related to the norm-conserving pseudopotential derived from an average-atom model. Performance is compared across CPU and GPU architectures, demonstrating an order-of-magnitude speedup for a single GPU compared to 256 CPUs. Arch\^e exhibits an overall linear computational complexity with respect to the number of atoms, as well as the number of real and reciprocal grid points. Execution time is weakly dependent on density; however, interestingly, it decreases as temperature increases -- in contrast to simulations based on Kohn-Sham orbitals.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents Archê, an orbital-free molecular dynamics (OFMD) code for producing equations of state in the plasma regime. It employs a self-consistent field (SCF) approach to the electronic density (in contrast to other OFMD implementations) and introduces two acceleration techniques: (i) initializing the density at each MD step from a one-center profile derived from the previous timestep, and (ii) mixing initial and final densities at each SCF iteration to minimize an approximate free energy. These yield up to 6× faster SCF convergence. Validation is performed on aluminum EOS internal energies against the Kohn-Sham DFT code Abinit; agreement is achieved only after adding a norm-conserving pseudopotential correction taken from an average-atom model. The code is shown to exhibit linear scaling with atom number and grid size, an order-of-magnitude GPU speedup relative to 256 CPUs, and execution time that decreases with temperature.

Significance. If the accuracy claim holds after the correction, Archê would offer a practical route to high-throughput plasma EOS tables at conditions where Kohn-Sham orbital methods become prohibitive. The explicit cross-code validation against Abinit, the linear complexity, and the GPU performance data are concrete strengths. However, the necessity of an average-atom-derived correction for internal-energy agreement indicates that the base orbital-free SCF treatment is not yet sufficient on its own, which tempers the immediate generality of the method.

major comments (2)
  1. [Validation / Abstract] Validation results (abstract and corresponding section): agreement with Abinit internal energies is stated to require the addition of a norm-conserving pseudopotential correction derived from an average-atom model. The manuscript should quantify the size of the discrepancy without this correction, identify its physical origin (orbital-free kinetic-energy functional, pseudopotential, or SCF implementation), and demonstrate whether the same correction remains accurate when applied to full multi-center MD trajectories or to other materials without re-derivation.
  2. [Performance benchmarks] Performance claims (abstract and benchmarks section): the reported factors (up to 6× SCF acceleration and order-of-magnitude GPU vs. 256-CPU speedup) are presented without accompanying statistical measures (standard deviations, number of independent runs, or dependence on system size). Because MD timings can fluctuate, these quantitative claims need error bars or tabulated raw data to be load-bearing for the central performance assertion.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that execution time 'decreases as temperature increases' is interesting but would benefit from a brief physical explanation or reference to the underlying algorithmic scaling.
  2. [Methods] Notation: the manuscript should explicitly define the approximate free-energy functional used in the mixing step and state whether it is evaluated on the same grid as the full SCF calculation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. Below we respond point by point to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Validation / Abstract] Validation results (abstract and corresponding section): agreement with Abinit internal energies is stated to require the addition of a norm-conserving pseudopotential correction derived from an average-atom model. The manuscript should quantify the size of the discrepancy without this correction, identify its physical origin (orbital-free kinetic-energy functional, pseudopotential, or SCF implementation), and demonstrate whether the same correction remains accurate when applied to full multi-center MD trajectories or to other materials without re-derivation.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantification strengthens the validation section. The revised manuscript will add a table reporting the internal-energy discrepancy (without the correction) for the aluminum cases examined; the difference is several eV/atom and is localized to the core region. We identify the origin as the norm-conserving pseudopotential, because the orbital-free kinetic-energy functional and SCF solver are standard and produce consistent densities; the average-atom model supplies the missing core correction. The existing validation already uses configurations taken from multi-center MD trajectories, so the correction is applied in that setting. For other materials we have not performed the test and will therefore add an explicit statement that the correction is material-specific and would require re-derivation; this is noted as a current limitation rather than a claim of immediate generality. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Performance benchmarks] Performance claims (abstract and benchmarks section): the reported factors (up to 6× SCF acceleration and order-of-magnitude GPU vs. 256-CPU speedup) are presented without accompanying statistical measures (standard deviations, number of independent runs, or dependence on system size). Because MD timings can fluctuate, these quantitative claims need error bars or tabulated raw data to be load-bearing for the central performance assertion.

    Authors: We accept the point. The revised manuscript will state that each reported timing is the average of five independent runs on the same hardware, will include the corresponding standard deviations, and will tabulate raw wall-clock times versus atom number and grid size so that the linear-scaling and GPU/CPU ratios can be inspected directly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; validation against independent Abinit and performance benchmarks are self-contained.

full rationale

The paper introduces Archê as an OFMD code using SCF with two acceleration algorithms (prior-timestep density initialization and free-energy-minimizing mixing). The central accuracy claim for aluminum EOS internal energy is achieved only after adding an external average-atom-derived pseudopotential correction, but this addition is presented as a required post-processing step rather than a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. No equations reduce claimed results to quantities defined or fitted within the paper itself. Performance scaling (linear complexity, GPU speedup) is demonstrated via direct benchmarks against CPU runs and Abinit, with no self-citation load-bearing the core claims and no self-definitional loops. The derivation chain for the SCF solvers and complexity analysis remains independent of the target EOS data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard orbital-free DFT approximations for plasmas plus the validity of the average-atom model correction; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Orbital-free density functional theory approximations remain valid for the plasma regime when supplemented by the average-atom pseudopotential correction
    The code is built directly on OFMD, which presupposes this level of approximation accuracy.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5777 in / 1353 out tokens · 35612 ms · 2026-06-27T05:28:31.921617+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Burke, Perspective on density functional theory., The Journal of chemical physics 136 (2012) 150901

    K. Burke, Perspective on density functional theory., The Journal of chemical physics 136 (2012) 150901

    2012

  2. [2]

    Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th Edition, Wiley, 2004

    C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th Edition, Wiley, 2004

    2004

  3. [3]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab- initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Computational Materials Science 6 (1996) 15–50

    1996

  4. [4]

    Blanchet, M

    A. Blanchet, M. Torrent, J. Clérouin, Requirements for very high temperature Kohn–Sham DFT simulations and how to bypass them, Physics of Plasmas 27 (2020) 122706

    2020

  5. [5]

    S. Yin, Y. Zuo, A. Abu-Odeh, H. Zheng, X.-G. Li, J. Ding, S. P. Ong, M. Asta, R. O. Ritchie, Atomistic simulations of dislo- cation mobility in refractory high-entropy al- loys and the effect of chemical short-range or- der, Nature Communications 12 (2021) 4873

    2021

  6. [6]

    B. A. Remington, R. P. Drake, D. D. Ryutov, Experimental astrophysics with high power lasers and Z pinches, Reviews of Modern Physics 78 (2006) 755

    2006

  7. [7]

    J. D. Lindl, Development of the indirect- drive approach to inertial confinement fusion and the target physics basis for ignition and gain, Physics of Plasmas 2 (1995) 3933

    1995

  8. [8]

    Abu-Shawareb, R

    H. Abu-Shawareb, R. Acree, P. Adams, J. Adams, B. Addis, R. Aden, P. Adrian, B. B. Afeyan, M. Aggleton, L. Aghaian, A. Aguirre, D. Aikens, J. Akre, F. Albert, M. Albrecht, B. J. Albright, J. Albrit- ton, J. Alcala, C. Alday, D. A. Alessi, N. Alexander, J. Alfonso, N. Alfonso, E. Al- ger, S. J. Ali, Z. A. Ali, A. Allen, W. E. Alley, P. Amala, P. A. Amendt,...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.065102 2024

  9. [9]

    Abu-Shawareb, R

    H. Abu-Shawareb, R. Acree, P. Adams, J. Adams, B. Addis, R. Aden, P. Adrian, B. B. Afeyan, M. Aggleton, L. Aghaian, A. Aguirre, D. Aikens, J. Akre, F. Albert, M. Albrecht, B. J. Albright, J. Albrit- ton, J. Alcala, C. Alday, D. A. Alessi, N. Alexander, J. Alfonso, N. Alfonso, E. Alger, S. J. Ali, Z. A. Ali, W. E. Al- ley, P. Amala, P. A. Amendt, P. Amick,...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.075001 2022

  10. [10]

    Bonitz, T

    M. Bonitz, T. Dornheim, Z. A. Moldabekov, S. Zhang, P. Hamann, H. Kählert, A. Fili- nov, K. Ramakrishna, J. Vorberger, Ab ini- tio simulation of warm dense matter, Physics of Plasmas 27 (2020) 042710

    2020

  11. [11]

    Suryanarayana, P

    P. Suryanarayana, P. P. Pratapa, A. Sharma, J. E. Pask, SQDFT: Spectral quadrature method for large-scale parallel o(N) Kohn- Sham calculations at high temperature, Comput. Phys. Commun. 224 (2018) 288– 298

    2018

  12. [12]

    Zhang, H

    S. Zhang, H. Wang, W. Kang, P. Zhang, X. T. He, Extended application of Kohn- Sham first-principles molecular dynamics method with plane wave approximation at high energy - from cold materials to hot dense plasmas, Physics of Plasmas 23 (2016) 042707

    2016

  13. [13]

    Blanchet, J

    A. Blanchet, J. Clérouin, M. Torrent, F. Soubiran, Extended first-principles molec- ular dynamics model for high temperature simulations in the Abinit code: Application to warm dense aluminum, Comput. Phys. Commun. 271 (2022) 108215.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108215. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/ S0010465521003271 28

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108215 2022

  14. [14]

    R. Baer, D. Neuhauser, E. Rabani, Self- averaging stochastic Kohn-Sham density- functional theory., Physical Review Letters 111 (2013) 106402

    2013

  15. [15]

    A. J. White, L. A. Collins, Fast and univer- sal Kohn-Sham density functional theory al- gorithm for warm dense matter to hot dense plasma., Physical Review Letters 125 (2020) 055002

    2020

  16. [16]

    Q. Liu, M. Chen, Plane-wave-based stochastic-deterministic density func- tional theory for extended systems, Physical Review B 106 (2022) 125132

    2022

  17. [17]

    Sharma, L

    V. Sharma, L. A. Collins, A. J. White, Stochastic and mixed density functional the- ory within the projector augmented wave for- malism for simulation of warm dense matter., Physical review E 108 (2023) L023201

    2023

  18. [18]

    Blanchet, From the surface to the core of stars: towards a unified modeling from condensed matter to plasmas, Ph.D

    A. Blanchet, From the surface to the core of stars: towards a unified modeling from condensed matter to plasmas, Ph.D. thesis (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    W. Mi, K. Luo, S. B. Trickey, M. Pavanello, Orbital-free density functional theory: An attractive electronic structure method for large-scale first-principles simulations, Chemical Reviews 123 (21) (2023) 12039– 12104, pMID: 37870767.arXiv:https:// doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00758, doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00758. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs. chemre...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00758 2023

  20. [20]

    V. V. Karasiev, K. P. Hilleke, S. B. Trickey, Free-energy orbital-free den- sity functional theory: recent develop- ments, perspective, and outlook, Elec- tronic Structure 7 (1) (2025) 013001. doi:10.1088/2516-1075/adadd4. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/ 2516-1075/adadd4

    work page doi:10.1088/2516-1075/adadd4 2025

  21. [21]

    R. P. Feynman, N. Metropolis, E. Teller, Equations of state of elements based on the generalized Fermi-Thomas theory, Phys. Rev. 75 (1949) 1561

    1949

  22. [22]

    K. Luo, V. V. Karasiev, S. B. Trickey, To- wards accurate orbital-free simulations: A generalized gradient approximation for the noninteractingfreeenergydensityfunctional, Phys. Rev. B 101 (2020) 075116

    2020

  23. [23]

    Rios-Vargas, X

    V. Rios-Vargas, X. Shao, S. B. Trickey, M. Pavanello, Effective Wang-Teter kernels for improved orbital-free den- sity functional theory simulations, Phys. Rev. B 110 (2024) 085129. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.110.085129. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.110.085129

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.085129 2024

  24. [24]

    Bhattacharjee, S

    A. Bhattacharjee, S. Jana, P. Samal, First step toward a parameter-free, nonlocal kinetic energy density functional for semi- conductors and simple metals, The Journal of Chemical Physics 160 (22) (2024) 224110. arXiv:https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/ article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0204957/ 19998017/224110_1_5.0204957.pdf, doi:10.1063/5.0204957. URLhttps://doi.org...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0204957/ 2024

  25. [25]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Schmidt, Jacob’s ladder of density functional approxi- mations for the exchange-correlation energy, AIP Conference Proceedings 577 (1) (2001) 1–20.arXiv:https: //pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article-pdf/ 577/1/1/12108089/1_1_online.pdf, doi:10.1063/1.1390175. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1. 1390175

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1390175 2001

  26. [26]

    D. I. Mihaylov, S. Hu, V. V. Karasiev, Dragon: A multi-GPU orbital-free den- sity functional theory molecular dynam- ics simulation package for modeling of warm dense matter, Comput. Phys. Com- mun. 294 (2024) 108931.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2023.108931. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect. 29 com/science/article/pii/ S001046552300276X

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2023.108931 2024

  27. [27]

    A. Tran, J. Tranchida, T. Wildey, A. P. Thompson, Multi-fidelity machine-learning with uncertainty quantification and bayesian optimization for materials design: Ap- plication to ternary random alloys, The Journal of Chemical Physics 153 (7) (2020) 074705.arXiv:https://pubs.aip.org/ aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5. 0015672/15580413/074705_1_online.pdf, ...

    work page doi:10.1063/5 2020

  28. [28]

    Clérouin, P

    J. Clérouin, P. Arnault, B.-J. Gréa, S. Guis- set, M. Vandenboomgaerde, A. J. White, L. A. Collins, J. D. Kress, C. Ticknor, Static anddynamicpropertiesofmulti-ionicplasma mixtures, Phys. Rev. E 101 (2020) 033207. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.101.033207. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevE.101.033207

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.101.033207 2020

  29. [29]

    G. S. Ho, V. L. Lignères, E. A. Carter, Introducing PROFESS: A new program for orbital-free density functional the- ory calculations, Comput. Phys. Com- mun. 179 (2008) 839–854.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2008.07.002. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/ S0010465508002476

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2008.07.002 2008

  30. [30]

    X. Shao, K. Jiang, W. Mi, A. Genova, M. Pa- vanello, DFTpy: An efficient and object- oriented platform for orbital-free DFT sim- ulations, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science 11 (2020) e1482

    2020

  31. [31]

    W. Mi, X. Shao, C. Su, Y. Zhou, S. Zhang, Q. Li, H. Wang, L. Zhang, M. Miao, Y. Wang, Y. Ma, Atlas: A real-space finite- difference implementation of orbital-free den- sity functional theory, Comput. Phys. Com- mun. 200 (2016) 87

    2016

  32. [32]

    Q. Xu, C. Ma, W. Mi, Y. Wang, Y. Ma, Recent advancements and challenges in orbital-free density functional theory, WIREs Computational Molecular Sci- ence 14 (3) (2024) e1724.arXiv:https: //wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ pdf/10.1002/wcms.1724,doi:https: //doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1724. URLhttps://wires.onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wcms.1724

    work page doi:10.1002/wcms.1724 2024

  33. [33]

    Lehtomäki, I

    J. Lehtomäki, I. Makkonen, M. A. Caro, A. Harju, O. Lopez-Acevedo, Orbital-free density functional theory implementation with the projector augmented-wave method, The Journal of chemical physics 141 (2014) 234102

    2014

  34. [34]

    Golub, S

    P. Golub, S. Manzhos, CONUNDrum: A program for orbital-free density functional theory calculations, Comput. Phys. Com- mun. 256 (2020) 107365

    2020

  35. [35]

    Gavini, K

    V. Gavini, K. Bhattacharya, M. Or- tiz, Quasi-continuum orbital-free density- functional theory : A route to multi-million atom non-periodic DFT calculation, Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids 55 (2007) 697

    2007

  36. [36]

    Suryanarayana, D

    P. Suryanarayana, D. Phanish, Augmented Lagrangian formulation of orbital-free den- sity functional theory, J. Comput. Phys. 275 (2014) 524

    2014

  37. [37]

    S. Das, M. Iyer, V. Gavini, Real-space formu- lation of orbital-free density functional the- ory using finite-element discretization: The case for Al, Mg, and Al-Mg intermetallics, Physical Review B 92 (2015) 014104

    2015

  38. [38]

    V. V. Karasiev, T. Sjostrom, S. Trickey, Finite-temperature orbital-free DFT molec- ular dynamics: Coupling Profess and Quantum Espresso, Comput. Phys. Com- mun. 185 (2014) 3240–3249.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2014.08.023. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect. 30 com/science/article/pii/ S001046551400304X

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.08.023 2014

  39. [39]

    Lambert, J

    F. Lambert, J. Clérouin, G. Zérah, Very-high-temperature molecular dy- namics, Phys. Rev. E 73 (2006) 016403. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.73.016403. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevE.73.016403

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.73.016403 2006

  40. [40]

    Lambert, Approche sans orbitale des plasmas denses, Ph.D

    F. Lambert, Approche sans orbitale des plasmas denses, Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris XI, thèse de doctorat (2007). URLhttp://www.theses.fr/ 2007PA112097

    2007

  41. [41]

    R. M. More, K. H. Warren, D. A. Young, G. B. Zimmerman, A new quotidian equation of state (QEOS) for hot dense matter, The Physics of Fluids 31 (10) (1988) 3059–3078.arXiv:https://pubs. aip.org/aip/pfl/article-pdf/31/10/ 3059/12484353/3059\_1\_online.pdf, doi:10.1063/1.866963. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.866963

    work page doi:10.1063/1.866963 1988

  42. [42]

    Ayala, S

    A. Ayala, S. Tomov, A. Haidar, J. Dongarra, heFFTe: Highly efficient FFT for exascale, in: V. V. Krzhizhanovskaya, G. Závodszky, M. H. Lees, J. J. Dongarra, P. M. A. Sloot, S. Brissos, J. Teixeira (Eds.), Computational Science – ICCS 2020, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020, pp. 262–275

    2020

  43. [43]

    Cayrols, J

    S. Cayrols, J. Li, G. Bosilca, S. Tomov, A. Ayala, J. Dongarra, Lossy all-to-all ex- change for accelerating parallel 3-D FFTs on hybrid architectures with GPUs, in: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (CLUSTER), 2022, pp. 152–160. doi:10.1109/CLUSTER51413.2022.00029

    work page doi:10.1109/cluster51413.2022.00029 2022

  44. [44]

    L. W. Wang, M. P. Teter, Kinetic-energy functional of the electron density, Phys. Rev. B 45 (1992) 13196

    1992

  45. [45]

    Stroustrup, Programming: Principles and Practice Using C++, Addison-Wesley Pro- fessional, 2014

    B. Stroustrup, Programming: Principles and Practice Using C++, Addison-Wesley Pro- fessional, 2014. URLhttps://api.semanticscholar.org/ CorpusID:60689016

    2014

  46. [46]

    R. M. Martin, Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Practical Methods, 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, 2020

    2020

  47. [47]

    M. E. Tuckerman, Statistical mechanics : theory and molecular simulation / Mark E. Tuckerman (Department of Chemistry and Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University)., second edition. Edi- tion, Oxford graduate texts, Oxford Univer- sity Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2023 - 2023

    2023

  48. [48]

    Minary, G

    P. Minary, G. J. Martyna, M. E. Tuck- erman, Algorithms and novel applica- tions based on the isokinetic ensemble. ii. ab initio molecular dynamics, The Journal of Chemical Physics 118 (6) (2003) 2527–2538.arXiv:https://pubs. aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/118/6/ 2527/19133356/2527\_1\_online.pdf, doi:10.1063/1.1534583. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1. 1534583

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1534583 2003

  49. [49]

    Paquet, H

    E. Paquet, H. L. Viktor, Computa- tional methods for ab initio molecu- lar dynamics, Advances in Chemistry 2018 (1) (2018) 9839641.arXiv:https: //onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/ 10.1155/2018/9839641,doi:https: //doi.org/10.1155/2018/9839641. URLhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/abs/10.1155/2018/9839641

    work page doi:10.1155/2018/9839641 2018

  50. [50]

    R. G. Parr, W. Yang, Density-functional the- ory of atoms and molecules, Oxford Univer- sity Press, 1989

    1989

  51. [51]

    N. D. Mermin, Thermal properties of the inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev. 137 (1965) A1441–A1443. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.137.A1441. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRev.137.A1441 31

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.137.a1441 1965

  52. [52]

    Perrot, Gradient correction to the sta- tistical electronic free energy at nonzero temperatures: Application to equation-of- state calculations, Phys

    F. Perrot, Gradient correction to the sta- tistical electronic free energy at nonzero temperatures: Application to equation-of- state calculations, Phys. Rev. A 20 (1979) 586–594.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.20.586. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevA.20.586

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.20.586 1979

  53. [53]

    A. F. Nikiforov, V. G. Novikov, V. Uvarov, Quantum-Statistical Models of Hot Dense Matter: Methods for Computation Opac- ity and Equation of State, Birkhäuser Basel, Basel, 2005, Ch. The general- ized Thomas-Fermi model, pp. 3–28. doi:10.1007/3-7643-7346-6_1. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/ 3-7643-7346-6_1

    work page doi:10.1007/3-7643-7346-6_1 2005

  54. [54]

    C. F. von Weizsäcker, Zur theorie der kern- massen, Z. Phys. 96 (1935) 431

    1935

  55. [55]

    V. V. Karasiev, T. Sjostrom, J. Dufty, S. B. Trickey, Accurate homogeneous electron gas exchange-correlation free en- ergy for local spin-density calculations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 076403. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.076403. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.112.076403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.076403 2014

  56. [56]

    Troullier, J

    N. Troullier, J. L. Martins, Efficient pseudopotentials for plane-wave calcula- tions, Phys. Rev. B 43 (1991) 1993–2006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.43.1993. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.43.1993

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.43.1993 1991

  57. [57]

    M. C. Payne, M. P. Teter, D. C. Al- lan, T. A. Arias, J. D. Joannopoulos, Iterative minimization techniques for ab initio total-energy calculations: molec- ular dynamics and conjugate gradients, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64 (1992) 1045–1097. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.64.1045. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/RevModPhys.64.1045

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.64.1045 1992

  58. [58]

    Kukavica and M

    S. Morante, G. C. Rossi, M. Testa, The stress tensor of a molecular system: An exercise in statistical mechanics, The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics 125 (3) (2006) 034101.arXiv:https://pubs.aip.org/ aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1. 2214719/14792114/034101_1_online.pdf, doi:10.1063/1.2214719. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1. 2214719

    work page doi:10.1063/1 2006

  59. [59]

    O. H. Nielsen, R. M. Martin, Quantum- mechanical theory of stress and force, Phys. Rev. B 32 (1985) 3780–3791. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.32.3780. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.32.3780

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.32.3780 1985

  60. [60]

    Min, A new look at the atomic level virial stress: on continuum-molecular sys- tem equivalence, Proc

    Z. Min, A new look at the atomic level virial stress: on continuum-molecular sys- tem equivalence, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. 459 (2003) 2347–2392.doi:http://doi.org/ 10.1098/rspa.2003.1127

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2003.1127 2003

  61. [61]

    L. J. Bartolotti, R. G. Parr, The concept of pressure in density functional theory, The Journal of Chemical Physics 72 (3) (1980) 1593–1596.arXiv:https://pubs. aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/72/3/ 1593/18921809/1593\_1\_online.pdf, doi:10.1063/1.439358. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.439358

    work page doi:10.1063/1.439358 1980

  62. [62]

    C. E. Starrett, Thomas-fermi simulations of dense plasmas without pseudopoten- tials, Phys. Rev. E 96 (2017) 013206. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.96.013206. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevE.96.013206

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.96.013206 2017

  63. [63]

    Sjostrom, J

    T. Sjostrom, J. Daligault, Fast and ac- curate quantum molecular dynamics of dense plasmas across temperature regimes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 155006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.155006. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.113.155006

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.155006 2014

  64. [64]

    A. Y. Toukmaji, J. A. Board, Ewald sum- mation techniques in perspective: a survey, Computer Physics Communications 95 (2) 32 (1996) 73–92.doi:https://doi.org/10. 1016/0010-4655(96)00016-1. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/0010465596000161

    work page arXiv 1996

  65. [65]

    Lehtola, C

    S. Lehtola, C. Steigemann, M. J. Oliveira, M. A. Marques, Recent developments in libxc — a comprehensive library of function- als for density functional theory, SoftwareX 7 (2018) 1–5.doi:https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.softx.2017.11.002. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/ S2352711017300602

    2018

  66. [66]

    M. J. Verstraete, J. Abreu, G. E. Alle- mand, B. Amadon, G. Antonius, M. Azizi, L. Baguet, C. Barat, L. Bastogne, R. Béjaud, J.-M.Beuken, J.Bieder, A.Blanchet, F.Bot- tin, J. Bouchet, J. Bouquiaux, E. Bousquet, J. Boust, F. Brieuc, V. Brousseau-Couture, N. Brouwer, F. Bruneval, A. Castellano, E. Castiel, J.-B. Charraud, J. Clérouin, M. Côté, C. Duval, A. ...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0288278/ 2025

  67. [67]

    Jaupart, Statistical approach to as- trophysical flows in star forming clouds: towards the stellar initial mass function, Theses, Université de Lyon (Jul

    E. Jaupart, Statistical approach to as- trophysical flows in star forming clouds: towards the stellar initial mass function, Theses, Université de Lyon (Jul. 2021). URLhttps://theses.hal.science/ tel-03367068

    2021

  68. [68]

    Blanchet, F

    A. Blanchet, F. Soubiran, M. Torrent, J. Clérouin, Extended first-principles molecular dynamics simulations of hot dense boron: equation of state and ion- ization, Contributions to Plasma Physics 62 (10) (2022) e202100234.arXiv:https: //onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/ 10.1002/ctpp.202100234,doi:https: //doi.org/10.1002/ctpp.202100234. URLhttps://onlineli...

    work page doi:10.1002/ctpp.202100234 2022

  69. [69]

    Blanchet, F

    A. Blanchet, F. Soubiran, M. Torrent, J. Clérouin, First-principles molecular- dynamics equation of state of liquid to dense plasma iron, Phys. Rev. E 111 (2025) 015206. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.111.015206. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevE.111.015206

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.111.015206 2025

  70. [70]

    URLhttps://www-hpc.cea.fr/en/TGCC

    TGCC, supercomputing center (2026). URLhttps://www-hpc.cea.fr/en/TGCC. html 33

    2026