pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.13627 · v1 · pith:F4QWLL7Bnew · submitted 2026-06-11 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· math-ph· math.MP

A Graphical Coaction for FRW Integrals from Partial/Relative Twisted (Co)homology

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 05:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.MP
keywords FRW integralsgraphical coactiontwisted (co)homologyintersection theorycosmological observablesFeynman diagramskinematic flow
0
0 comments X

The pith

FRW integrals admit a graphical coaction derived from twisted (co)homology.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how to construct a coaction for FRW integrals that appears directly as decorations on Feynman diagrams. It relies on intersection theory within partial and relative twisted (co)homology to break the integrals, along with their discontinuities and derivatives, into simpler pieces. This approach gives a combinatorial way to handle the analytic properties of these cosmological integrals. If correct, it explains why the differential equations for FRW integrals have a specific kinematic flow as a direct result of the coaction structure. The result applies to all loop orders in the specified scalar theories.

Core claim

We construct a graphical coaction for Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) integrals at all loop orders in conformally-coupled scalar theories with non-conformal polynomial interactions. Our construction makes use of intersection theory in the context of (partial/relative) twisted (co)homology, which we use to decompose FRW integrals (and their discontinuities and derivatives) into building blocks that can be represented as decorations of the original Feynman diagram. This facilitates a purely graphical description of the coaction, up to rational prefactors that can be read off from the graph. Our construction provides a comprehensive combinatorial framework for dissecting the analytic propertie

What carries the argument

Graphical coaction from intersection theory in partial/relative twisted (co)homology, representing decompositions as diagram decorations.

If this is right

  • The coaction yields a combinatorial description of how FRW integrals and their derivatives behave.
  • The kinematic flow of the governing differential equations follows from the coaction.
  • Discontinuities of the integrals are captured by the same graphical rules.
  • A web application and Mathematica notebook implement the coaction computation for any graph.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This method may extend to other types of loop integrals in quantum field theory.
  • The graphical nature could lead to new algorithms for evaluating cosmological correlation functions.
  • Similar structures might appear in the study of other physical observables governed by differential equations.

Load-bearing premise

The intersection theory in twisted (co)homology decomposes the FRW integrals into components representable as decorations on the Feynman diagram.

What would settle it

A mismatch between the graphical coaction prediction and the computed discontinuity or differential equation for a specific two-loop FRW integral.

read the original abstract

We construct a graphical coaction for Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) integrals at all loop orders in conformally-coupled scalar theories with non-conformal polynomial interactions. Our construction makes use of intersection theory in the context of (partial/relative) twisted (co)homology, which we use to decompose FRW integrals (and their discontinuities and derivatives) into building blocks that can be represented as decorations of the original Feynman diagram. This facilitates a purely graphical description of the coaction, up to rational prefactors that can be read off from the graph. Our construction provides a comprehensive combinatorial framework for dissecting the analytic properties of cosmological observables; in particular, we demonstrate that the combinatorics of the differential equations that govern FRW integrals -- their so-called kinematic flow -- is a natural consequence of our coaction. We have also developed a user-friendly web application that computes the graphical coaction of any graph: https://frwcoaction.ca. Whenever possible, the web application also computes the differentials and discontinuities. A Mathematica notebook with the same functionality is also hosted at on a public GitHub repository.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a graphical coaction for FRW integrals at all loop orders in conformally-coupled scalar theories with non-conformal polynomial interactions. It employs intersection theory in the setting of partial/relative twisted (co)homology to decompose the integrals (and their discontinuities and derivatives) into building blocks represented as decorations on the original Feynman diagram. This yields a purely graphical description of the coaction up to rational prefactors readable from the graph. The construction supplies a combinatorial framework for the analytic properties of cosmological observables and shows that the combinatorics of the kinematic flow in the governing differential equations follows directly as a consequence of the coaction. The work is accompanied by a web application (https://frwcoaction.ca) and a public Mathematica notebook that implement the coaction, differentials, and discontinuities for arbitrary graphs.

Significance. If the result holds, the work provides a significant combinatorial and graphical framework for dissecting analytic properties of FRW integrals at all loops, with direct implications for cosmological observables. The explicit supply of reproducible computational tools (web app and notebook) is a clear strength, enabling direct verification and application of the coaction to user-specified graphs. The derivation of kinematic flow equations as a combinatorial consequence of the coaction is a notable feature that strengthens the utility of the construction.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states that the GitHub repository is 'hosted at on a public GitHub repository' but does not provide the URL; include the explicit repository link in both the abstract and the main text for completeness.
  2. §1 (Introduction): the transition from the general twisted (co)homology setup to the specific partial/relative case for FRW integrals would benefit from a short schematic diagram or table summarizing the relevant (co)homology groups and their intersection pairings.
  3. The web application is described as computing 'whenever possible' the differentials and discontinuities; clarify in the manuscript the precise conditions under which these computations are supported or omitted.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, including the summary of our construction, the significance evaluation, and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were listed in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper applies external intersection theory from partial/relative twisted (co)homology to decompose FRW integrals into graph decorations, yielding a graphical coaction whose combinatorial consequences (including kinematic flow) follow directly. No step reduces the result to a self-definition, a fitted input renamed as prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation chain; the construction is grounded in independent homology methods with explicit implementations for external verification.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract invokes standard tools from twisted (co)homology and intersection theory without introducing new free parameters or invented entities; the central claim rests on the applicability of these existing mathematical structures to FRW integrals.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Intersection theory in partial/relative twisted (co)homology applies to FRW integrals and their discontinuities/derivatives in the specified scalar theories
    Invoked in the abstract as the basis for decomposing integrals into graph decorations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5743 in / 1328 out tokens · 20331 ms · 2026-06-27T05:48:37.902471+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 37 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    R. J. Eden, P. V. Landshoff, D. I. Olive, and J. C. Polkinghorne,The Analytic S-Matrix. Cambridge University Press, 1966

  2. [2]

    D. J. Broadhurst,Massive three - loop Feynman diagrams reducible to SC* primitives of algebras of the sixth root of unity,Eur. Phys. J. C8(1999) 311–333, [hep-th/9803091]

  3. [3]

    Bogner and S

    C. Bogner and S. Weinzierl,Periods and Feynman integrals,J. Math. Phys.50(2009) 042302, [arXiv:0711.4863]

  4. [4]

    J. L. Bourjaily et al.,Functions Beyond Multiple Polylogarithms for Precision Collider Physics, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022.arXiv:2203.07088

  5. [5]

    Landau,On analytic properties of vertex parts in quantum field theory,Nucl

    L. Landau,On analytic properties of vertex parts in quantum field theory,Nucl. Phys.13 (1960), no. 1 181–192

  6. [6]

    Steinmann, ¨Uber den Zusammenhang Zwischen den Wightmanfunktionen und der Retardierten Kommutatoren,Helv

    O. Steinmann, ¨Uber den Zusammenhang Zwischen den Wightmanfunktionen und der Retardierten Kommutatoren,Helv. Physica Acta33(1960) 257

  7. [7]

    Steinmann,Wightman-Funktionen und Retardierte Kommutatoren

    O. Steinmann,Wightman-Funktionen und Retardierte Kommutatoren. II,Helv. Physica Acta 33(1960) 347.www.e-periodica.ch/cntmng?pid=hpa-001:1960:33::1079

  8. [8]

    Pham,Singularit´ es des processus de diffusion multiple,Annales de l’I.H.P

    F. Pham,Singularit´ es des processus de diffusion multiple,Annales de l’I.H.P. Physique th´ eorique6(1967), no. 2 89–204

  9. [9]

    H. S. Hannesdottir, L. Lippstreu, A. J. McLeod, and M. Polackova,Minimal Cuts and Genealogical Constraints on Feynman Integrals,arXiv:2406.05943

  10. [10]

    Caron-Huot, L

    S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, F. Dulat, M. Von Hippel, A. J. McLeod, and G. Papathanasiou, The Cosmic Galois Group and Extended Steinmann Relations for PlanarN= 4SYM Amplitudes,JHEP09(2019) 061, [arXiv:1906.07116]

  11. [11]

    Arkani-Hamed, J

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, A. B. Goncharov, A. Postnikov, and J. Trnka, Grassmannian Geometry of Scattering Amplitudes. Cambridge University Press, 4, 2016

  12. [12]

    Schlotterer and S

    O. Schlotterer and S. Stieberger,Motivic Multiple Zeta Values and Superstring Amplitudes,J. Phys.A46(2013) 475401, [arXiv:1205.1516]

  13. [13]

    Brown,Feynman amplitudes, coaction principle, and cosmic Galois group,Commun

    F. Brown,Feynman amplitudes, coaction principle, and cosmic Galois group,Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.11(2017) 453–556, [arXiv:1512.06409]

  14. [14]

    Panzer and O

    E. Panzer and O. Schnetz,The Galois coaction onϕ 4 periods,Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.11 (2017) 657–705, [arXiv:1603.04289]

  15. [15]

    Schnetz,The Galois coaction on the electron anomalous magnetic moment,Commun

    O. Schnetz,The Galois coaction on the electron anomalous magnetic moment,Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.12(2018) 335–354, [arXiv:1711.05118]

  16. [16]

    G¨ urdo˘ gan,From integrability to the Galois coaction on Feynman periods,Phys

    O. G¨ urdo˘ gan,From integrability to the Galois coaction on Feynman periods,Phys. Rev. D103 (2021), no. 8 L081703, [arXiv:2011.04781]

  17. [17]

    L. J. Dixon, O. Gurdogan, A. J. McLeod, and M. Wilhelm,Folding Amplitudes into Form Factors: An Antipodal Duality,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022), no. 11 111602, [arXiv:2112.06243]

  18. [18]

    L. J. Dixon, O. G¨ urdo˘ gan, Y.-T. Liu, A. J. McLeod, and M. Wilhelm,Antipodal Self-Duality for a Four-Particle Form Factor,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023), no. 11 111601, [arXiv:2212.02410]. – 63 –

  19. [19]

    A. B. Goncharov,Multiple polylogarithms and mixed Tate motives,math/0103059

  20. [20]

    F. C. Brown,Multiple zeta values and periods of moduli spaces M0,n(R),Annales Sci.Ecole Norm.Sup.42(2009) 371, [math/0606419]

  21. [21]

    Brown,Notes on Motivic Periods,arXiv:1512.06410

    F. Brown,Notes on Motivic Periods,arXiv:1512.06410

  22. [22]

    Caron-Huot, L

    S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, M. von Hippel, A. J. McLeod, and G. Papathanasiou,The Double Pentaladder Integral to All Orders,JHEP07(2018) 170, [arXiv:1806.01361]

  23. [23]

    L. J. Dixon, O. Gurdogan, A. J. McLeod, and M. Wilhelm,Bootstrapping a stress-tensor form factor through eight loops,JHEP07(2022) 153, [arXiv:2204.11901]

  24. [24]

    L. J. Dixon and Y.-T. Liu,An eight loop amplitude via antipodal duality,JHEP09(2023) 098, [arXiv:2308.08199]

  25. [25]

    Basso, L

    B. Basso, L. J. Dixon, and A. G. Tumanov,The three-point form factor of Trϕ 3 to six loops, JHEP02(2025) 034, [arXiv:2410.22402]

  26. [26]

    S. He, X. Jiang, X. Li, and J. Liu,Heptagon Symbols at Five Loops and All-Loop Sequences, arXiv:2511.09669

  27. [27]

    Chen,Iterated path integrals,Bull

    K.-T. Chen,Iterated path integrals,Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.83(1977), no. 5 831–879

  28. [28]

    A. B. Goncharov,Geometry of configurations, polylogarithms, and motivic cohomology,Adv. Math.114(1995), no. 2 197–318

  29. [29]

    A. B. Goncharov,Multiple polylogarithms, cyclotomy and modular complexes,Math. Res. Lett. 5(1998) 497–516, [arXiv:1105.2076]

  30. [30]

    Remiddi and J

    E. Remiddi and J. Vermaseren,Harmonic polylogarithms,Int.J.Mod.Phys.A15(2000) 725–754, [hep-ph/9905237]

  31. [31]

    J. M. Borwein, D. M. Bradley, D. J. Broadhurst, and P. Lisonek,Special values of multiple polylogarithms,Trans. Am. Math. Soc.353(2001) 907–941, [math/9910045]

  32. [32]

    S. Moch, P. Uwer, and S. Weinzierl,Nested sums, expansion of transcendental functions and multiscale multiloop integrals,J.Math.Phys.43(2002) 3363–3386, [hep-ph/0110083]

  33. [33]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, and V. A. Smirnov,An Analytic Result for the Two-Loop Hexagon Wilson Loop in N = 4 SYM,JHEP03(2010) 099, [arXiv:0911.5332]

  34. [34]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, and V. A. Smirnov,The Two-Loop Hexagon Wilson Loop in N = 4 SYM,JHEP05(2010) 084, [arXiv:1003.1702]

  35. [35]

    A. B. Goncharov,Galois symmetries of fundamental groupoids and noncommutative geometry, Duke Math. J.128(06, 2005) 209–284, [math/0208144]

  36. [36]

    A. B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu, and A. Volovich,Classical Polylogarithms for Amplitudes and Wilson Loops,Phys.Rev.Lett.105(2010) 151605, [arXiv:1006.5703]

  37. [37]

    Brown,On the decomposition of motivic multiple zeta values,Adv

    F. Brown,On the decomposition of motivic multiple zeta values,Adv. Studies in Pure Math.63 (2012) 31–58, [arXiv:1102.1310]

  38. [38]

    Brown,Mixed Tate motives overZ,Ann

    F. Brown,Mixed Tate motives overZ,Ann. of Math. (2)175(2012), no. 2 949–976, [arXiv:1102.1312]. – 64 –

  39. [39]

    Frost, M

    H. Frost, M. Hidding, D. Kamlesh, C. Rodriguez, O. Schlotterer, and B. Verbeek,Motivic coaction and single-valued map of polylogarithms from zeta generators,J. Phys. A57(2024), no. 31 31LT01, [arXiv:2312.00697]

  40. [40]

    Frost, M

    H. Frost, M. Hidding, D. Kamlesh, C. Rodriguez, O. Schlotterer, and B. Verbeek,Deriving motivic coactions and single-valued maps at genus zero from zeta generators, arXiv:2503.02096

  41. [41]

    Broedel, C

    J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, B. Penante, and L. Tancredi,Elliptic symbol calculus: from elliptic polylogarithms to iterated integrals of Eisenstein series,JHEP08(2018) 014, [arXiv:1803.10256]

  42. [42]

    Tapuˇ skovi´ c,The cosmic Galois group, the sunrise Feynman integral, and the relative completion ofΓ 1(6),arXiv:2303.17534

    M. Tapuˇ skovi´ c,The cosmic Galois group, the sunrise Feynman integral, and the relative completion ofΓ 1(6),arXiv:2303.17534

  43. [43]

    Brown and A

    F. Brown and A. Levin,Multiple elliptic polylogarithms,arXiv preprint arXiv:1110.6917(2011)

  44. [44]

    Brown and C

    F. Brown and C. Dupont,Lauricella Hypergeometric Functions, Unipotent Fundamental Groups of the Punctured Riemann Sphere, and Their Motivic Coactions,Nagoya Math. J.249(2023) 148–220, [arXiv:1907.06603]

  45. [45]

    Abreu, R

    S. Abreu, R. Britto, C. Duhr, E. Gardi, and J. Matthew,From positive geometries to a coaction on hypergeometric functions,JHEP02(2020) 122, [arXiv:1910.08358]

  46. [46]

    Kleinschmidt, F

    A. Kleinschmidt, F. Porkert, and O. Schlotterer,Towards Motivic Coactions at Genus One from Zeta Generators,arXiv:2508.02800

  47. [47]

    Abreu, R

    S. Abreu, R. Britto, C. Duhr, and E. Gardi,Algebraic Structure of Cut Feynman Integrals and the Diagrammatic Coaction,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017), no. 5 051601, [arXiv:1703.05064]

  48. [48]

    Abreu, R

    S. Abreu, R. Britto, C. Duhr, and E. Gardi,Diagrammatic Hopf algebra of cut Feynman integrals: the one-loop case,JHEP12(2017) 090, [arXiv:1704.07931]

  49. [49]

    Abreu, R

    S. Abreu, R. Britto, C. Duhr, E. Gardi, and J. Matthew,The diagrammatic coaction beyond one loop,JHEP10(2021) 131, [arXiv:2106.01280]

  50. [50]

    De and A

    S. De and A. Pokraka,Cosmology meets cohomology,JHEP03(2024) 156, [arXiv:2308.03753]

  51. [51]

    Arkani-Hamed, D

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, A. Hillman, A. Joyce, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel,Differential Equations for Cosmological Correlators,arXiv:2312.05303

  52. [52]

    Arkani-Hamed, P

    N. Arkani-Hamed, P. Benincasa, and A. Postnikov,Cosmological Polytopes and the Wavefunction of the Universe,arXiv:1709.02813

  53. [53]

    Glew and A

    R. Glew and A. Pokraka,Kinematic flow from the flow of cuts,arXiv:2508.11568

  54. [54]

    Baumann, H

    D. Baumann, H. Goodhew, A. Joyce, H. Lee, G. L. Pimentel, and T. Westerdijk,Geometry of Kinematic Flow,arXiv:2504.14890

  55. [55]

    S. He, X. Jiang, J. Liu, Q. Yang, and Y.-Q. Zhang,Differential equations and recursive solutions for cosmological amplitudes,arXiv:2407.17715

  56. [56]

    Duhr,Hopf algebras, coproducts and symbols: an application to Higgs boson amplitudes, JHEP1208(2012) 043, [arXiv:1203.0454]

    C. Duhr,Hopf algebras, coproducts and symbols: an application to Higgs boson amplitudes, JHEP1208(2012) 043, [arXiv:1203.0454]

  57. [57]

    C. Duhr, H. Gangl, and J. R. Rhodes,From polygons and symbols to polylogarithmic functions, JHEP10(2012) 075, [arXiv:1110.0458]. – 65 –

  58. [58]

    C. Duhr,Mathematical aspects of scattering amplitudes, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Journeys Through the Precision Frontier: Amplitudes for Colliders, pp. 419–476, 2015.arXiv:1411.7538

  59. [59]

    Abreu, R

    S. Abreu, R. Britto, C. Duhr, and E. Gardi,From multiple unitarity cuts to the coproduct of Feynman integrals,JHEP10(2014) 125, [arXiv:1401.3546]

  60. [60]

    Abreu, R

    S. Abreu, R. Britto, C. Duhr, and E. Gardi,Cuts from residues: the one-loop case,JHEP06 (2017) 114, [arXiv:1702.03163]

  61. [61]

    Abreu, R

    S. Abreu, R. Britto, C. Duhr, E. Gardi, and J. Matthew,Generalized hypergeometric functions and intersection theory for Feynman integrals,PoS(2019), no. RACOR2019 067, [arXiv:1912.03205]

  62. [62]

    Gardi, S

    E. Gardi, S. Abreu, R. Britto, C. Duhr, and J. Matthew,The diagrammatic coaction,PoS LL2022(2022) 015, [arXiv:2207.07843]

  63. [63]

    Caron-Huot, L

    S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond, F. Dulat, J. Foster, ¨O. G¨ urdo˘ gan, M. von Hippel, A. J. McLeod, and G. Papathanasiou,The Steinmann Cluster Bootstrap forN= 4 Super Yang-Mills Amplitudes,PoSCORFU2019(2020) 003, [arXiv:2005.06735]

  64. [64]

    Abreu, R

    S. Abreu, R. Britto, C. Duhr, and E. Gardi,The diagrammatic coaction and the algebraic structure of cut Feynman integrals,PoSRADCOR2017(2018) 002, [arXiv:1803.05894]

  65. [65]

    Glew,Correlators from Amplitubes,arXiv:2507.07199

    R. Glew,Correlators from Amplitubes,arXiv:2507.07199

  66. [66]

    Caron-Huot and A

    S. Caron-Huot and A. Pokraka,Duals of Feynman Integrals. Part II. Generalized unitarity, JHEP04(2022) 078, [arXiv:2112.00055]

  67. [67]

    Caron-Huot and A

    S. Caron-Huot and A. Pokraka,Duals of Feynman integrals. Part I. Differential equations, JHEP12(2021) 045, [arXiv:2104.06898]

  68. [68]

    Matsumoto,Relative twisted homology and cohomology groups associated with lauricella’sf d, arXiv:1804.00366

    K. Matsumoto,Relative twisted homology and cohomology groups associated with lauricella’sf d, arXiv:1804.00366

  69. [69]

    R. C. Hwa and V. L. Teplitz,Homology and Feynman integrals,Nucl. Phys. A98(1967), no. 3

  70. [70]

    Brown and C

    F. Brown and C. Dupont,Positive Geometries and Canonical Forms via Mixed Hodge Theory, Commun. Math. Phys.406(2025), no. 11 267, [arXiv:2501.03202]

  71. [71]

    Arkani-Hamed, Y

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y. Bai, and T. Lam,Positive Geometries and Canonical Forms,JHEP11 (2017) 039, [arXiv:1703.04541]

  72. [72]

    Pham,Singularities of integrals: Homology, hyperfunctions and microlocal analysis

    F. Pham,Singularities of integrals: Homology, hyperfunctions and microlocal analysis. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011

  73. [73]

    R. E. Cutkosky,Singularities and discontinuities of feynman amplitudes,Journal of Mathematical Physics1(09, 1960) 429–433

  74. [74]

    H. S. Hannesdottir, A. J. McLeod, M. D. Schwartz, and C. Vergu,Constraints on sequential discontinuities from the geometry of on-shell spaces,JHEP07(2023) 236, [arXiv:2211.07633]

  75. [75]

    Vergu,Cutkosky representation and direct integration,JHEP05(2024) 302, [arXiv:2311.16069]

    C. Vergu,Cutkosky representation and direct integration,JHEP05(2024) 302, [arXiv:2311.16069]

  76. [76]

    Caron-Huot, L

    S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, A. McLeod, and M. von Hippel,Bootstrapping a Five-Loop – 66 – Amplitude Using Steinmann Relations,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016), no. 24 241601, [arXiv:1609.00669]

  77. [77]

    Benincasa, A

    P. Benincasa, A. J. McLeod, and C. Vergu,Steinmann Relations and the Wavefunction of the Universe,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 125004, [arXiv:2009.03047]

  78. [78]

    J. L. Bourjaily, H. Hannesdottir, A. J. McLeod, M. D. Schwartz, and C. Vergu,Sequential Discontinuities of Feynman Integrals and the Monodromy Group,JHEP01(2021) 205, [arXiv:2007.13747]

  79. [79]

    H. S. Hannesdottir, L. Lippstreu, A. J. McLeod, and M. Polackova,Steinmann Violation and Minimal Cuts,arXiv:2512.24010

  80. [80]

    Boyling,A homological approach to parametric Feynman integrals,Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)53(1968), no

    J. Boyling,A homological approach to parametric Feynman integrals,Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)53(1968), no. 2 351–375

Showing first 80 references.