pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.17685 · v1 · pith:V62P6ANRnew · submitted 2026-06-16 · 🪐 quant-ph

Coherent Control of an Embedded Bound State Without a Spectral Gap

Yue Chang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 00:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords bound states in the continuumgiant atomwaveguide QEDsingle-photon memoryadiabatic controlembedded statescoherent controlopen quantum systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

A bound state in the continuum can be adiabatically controlled without a spectral gap using two temporal modulations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates how to turn a dark bound state in the continuum into a controllable single-photon memory in an open waveguide system. Frequency modulation toggles the destructive interference condition to capture and release photons on demand, while coupling modulation adjusts the atomic and photonic character of the stored state without violating the bound-state condition. The central result is that this embedded state supports adiabatic manipulation despite the missing spectral gap, with leakage probability rising linearly in the control ramp rate rather than being forbidden outright.

Core claim

In a giant atom coupled to a one-dimensional waveguide, two independent temporal controls—atomic frequency modulation and coupling strength modulation—enable coherent manipulation of a bound state in the continuum. Frequency modulation allows deterministic photon capture and release by toggling the BIC condition, while coupling modulation deforms the state's photonic and atomic weights without breaking the BIC. Despite the lack of a spectral gap, adiabatic control of this embedded state is possible, with an intrinsic leakage probability that scales linearly with the ramp rate of the controls.

What carries the argument

Two temporal control knobs on a giant atom in a 1D waveguide: frequency modulation to access the BIC radiatively and coupling modulation to preserve the BIC while deforming its composition.

If this is right

  • Deterministic capture and release of mode-matched single photons becomes possible by breaking and restoring the BIC interference condition.
  • The stored state's atomic versus photonic weights can be tuned while the bound-state condition remains intact.
  • Adiabatic deformation proceeds with leakage probability linear in ramp rate rather than exponentially suppressed.
  • Fidelity of the resulting single-photon memory is fixed by the intrinsic continuum leakage law.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The linear leakage scaling may impose a practical speed-fidelity tradeoff for any continuum-based quantum memory.
  • Similar dual-knob protocols could be tested in other open platforms such as atomic arrays or circuit QED where spectral gaps are also absent.
  • The separation of radiative access from BIC-preserving deformation offers a general template for controlling embedded states in non-Hermitian systems.

Load-bearing premise

The frequency and coupling modulations can be applied independently without introducing extra decoherence channels or unintended continuum couplings.

What would settle it

Measure the probability of photon loss during a controlled ramp of the coupling modulation and check whether it increases linearly with ramp speed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.17685 by Yue Chang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Two-knob temporal control of a giant-atom BIC. (a) A two-level giant atom couples to a one-dimensional waveguide at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Release of the BIC by detuning modulation. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Adiabatic control of the BIC. (a),(b) Normal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Bound states in the continuum (BICs) can confine photonic excitations in open systems without conventional cavities or band gaps, making them natural candidates for long-lived quantum storage and single-photon control. Their use is limited, however, by two obstacles: they are dark to incident photons, and they lack spectral-gap protection from the surrounding continuum. We overcome both limitations in a giant atom coupled to a one-dimensional waveguide using two temporal control knobs. Atomic-frequency modulation breaks and restores the destructive-interference condition, enabling deterministic capture and release of mode-matched single photons. Coupling modulation instead preserves the BIC condition while tuning the atomic and photonic weights of the stored state. A key result is that this embedded state can nevertheless be controlled adiabatically despite the absence of a spectral gap, with an intrinsic leakage probability linear in the ramp rate. By separating radiative access from BIC-preserving deformation, the protocol turns a dark BIC into a single-photon memory whose fidelity is set by the intrinsic continuum-induced leakage law, providing a route to embedded-state control in open photonic platforms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a control protocol for a bound state in the continuum (BIC) realized by a giant atom coupled to a 1D waveguide. Two independent temporal knobs are introduced: frequency modulation that breaks and restores the destructive-interference condition to enable deterministic single-photon capture and release, and coupling modulation that deforms the embedded state while preserving the BIC condition. The central theoretical result is that adiabatic control remains possible in the absence of a spectral gap, with an intrinsic leakage probability that scales linearly with the ramp rate; the resulting fidelity of the single-photon memory is therefore set by this continuum-induced leakage law.

Significance. If the linear leakage scaling and the orthogonality of the two modulation channels are rigorously established, the work supplies a concrete, model-derived route to coherent control of dark embedded states in open photonic systems. This is a notable advance for waveguide-QED quantum memory architectures that do not rely on cavities or band gaps. The explicit prediction of a linear-in-ramp-rate leakage probability constitutes a falsifiable, parameter-free scaling law that can be tested numerically or experimentally.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.1, Eq. (8)] §3.1, Eq. (8) and the subsequent derivation of the leakage probability: the claim that the two modulations act as orthogonal controls on the giant-atom Hamiltonian is load-bearing for the linear leakage law. The time-dependent interaction term contains position-dependent phase factors; simultaneous frequency and coupling modulation can generate cross terms that open additional continuum channels not included in the effective non-Hermitian or adiabatic-elimination treatment. This must be shown to be negligible or absorbed into the existing leakage coefficient.
  2. [§4.2] §4.2, the adiabatic theorem application: the absence of a spectral gap is acknowledged, yet the linear leakage scaling is derived under the assumption that the instantaneous eigenstate remains isolated from the continuum except through the controlled radiative access. A concrete bound on the non-adiabatic transition amplitude that accounts for possible cross-modulation terms is required to confirm that the leakage remains strictly linear rather than acquiring higher-order corrections.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the linear leakage result without reference to the governing equation; a parenthetical citation to the relevant derivation (e.g., Eq. (17)) would improve readability.
  2. [§2] Notation for the time-dependent detuning and coupling strengths (Ω(t), g(t)) should be introduced once in §2 and used consistently thereafter to avoid ambiguity between the two control knobs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, positive assessment of the work's significance, and constructive comments. We address each major point below. Where the comments identify opportunities for clarification or additional derivation, we will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.1, Eq. (8)] §3.1, Eq. (8) and the subsequent derivation of the leakage probability: the claim that the two modulations act as orthogonal controls on the giant-atom Hamiltonian is load-bearing for the linear leakage law. The time-dependent interaction term contains position-dependent phase factors; simultaneous frequency and coupling modulation can generate cross terms that open additional continuum channels not included in the effective non-Hermitian or adiabatic-elimination treatment. This must be shown to be negligible or absorbed into the existing leakage coefficient.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The position-dependent phases are retained throughout the derivation of the effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonian in Sec. 3.1. Frequency modulation enters solely through the atomic detuning term, while coupling modulation rescales the interaction amplitudes; the resulting cross terms generated by simultaneous modulation appear only at second order in the modulation depths. These higher-order contributions do not open new continuum channels at the leading order relevant to the leakage probability and are absorbed into the existing linear-in-ramp-rate coefficient. To make this explicit, the revised manuscript will include an expanded calculation (new Appendix) that isolates the cross terms and confirms they do not alter the linear scaling law. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2, the adiabatic theorem application: the absence of a spectral gap is acknowledged, yet the linear leakage scaling is derived under the assumption that the instantaneous eigenstate remains isolated from the continuum except through the controlled radiative access. A concrete bound on the non-adiabatic transition amplitude that accounts for possible cross-modulation terms is required to confirm that the leakage remains strictly linear rather than acquiring higher-order corrections.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit bound would strengthen the adiabatic analysis. The linear leakage follows from the continuum-induced non-adiabatic coupling, whose amplitude is proportional to the ramp rate (analogous to a gapless Landau-Zener process). We will add a derivation in Sec. 4.2 that supplies a concrete upper bound on the transition amplitude, explicitly incorporating any residual cross-modulation contributions. The bound shows that higher-order corrections remain O((ramp rate)^2) and are negligible in the slow-ramp regime, thereby confirming that the leading leakage remains strictly linear. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation chain self-contained against model assumptions

full rationale

The abstract presents the linear-in-ramp-rate leakage as a derived result from the giant-atom waveguide Hamiltonian under independent frequency and coupling modulations. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are exhibited that reduce the central claim (adiabatic control without gap, fidelity set by continuum leakage law) to its inputs by construction. The separation of radiative access from BIC-preserving deformation is introduced as a modeling choice, not as a tautology or renamed known result. The protocol is described as model-derived rather than statistically forced or self-referential. This matches the default expectation of a non-circular paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; the underlying model is presumed to rest on the standard time-dependent Schrödinger equation for a modulated giant-atom Hamiltonian in a 1D waveguide, but no explicit free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or new entities are stated.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Time-dependent quantum mechanics governs the modulated giant-atom-waveguide system
    Invoked implicitly for the adiabatic control and leakage calculation

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5698 in / 1329 out tokens · 44345 ms · 2026-06-27T00:33:54.580863+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    von Neumann and E

    J. von Neumann and E. Wigner. ¨Uber merkw¨ urdige diskrete eigenwerte.Physikalische Zeitschrift, 30:465– 467, 1929. URLhttps://link.springer.com/chapter/ 10.1007/978-3-662-02781-3_19

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-662-02781-3_19 1929

  2. [2]

    Douglas Stone, John D

    Chia Wei Hsu, Bo Zhen, A. Douglas Stone, John D. Joannopoulos, and Marin Soljaˇ ci´ c. Bound states in the continuum.Nature Reviews Materials, 1:16048,

  3. [3]

    URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.48

    doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.48. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.48

    work page doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.48 2016

  4. [4]

    Almas F. Sadreev. Interference traps waves in an open system: bound states in the continuum.Re- ports on Progress in Physics, 84:055901, 2021. doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/abefb9. URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1088/1361-6633/abefb9

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/abefb9 2021

  5. [5]

    Johnson, John D

    Chia Wei Hsu, Bo Zhen, Jeongwon Lee, Song-Liang Chua, Steven G. Johnson, John D. Joannopoulos, and Marin Soljaˇ ci´ c. Observation of trapped light within the radiation continuum.Nature, 499:188–191, 2013. doi: 10.1038/nature12289. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ nature12289

    work page doi:10.1038/nature12289 2013

  6. [6]

    Dou- glas Stone, and Marin Soljaˇ ci´ c

    Bo Zhen, Chia Wei Hsu, Ling Lu, A. Dou- glas Stone, and Marin Soljaˇ ci´ c. Topological na- ture of optical bound states in the continuum. Physical Review Letters, 113:257401, 2014. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.257401. URLhttps://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.257401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.257401 2014

  7. [7]

    Critical field enhancement of asymptotic optical bound states in the continuum.Scientific Reports, 5: 18301, 2015

    Jae Woong Yoon, Seok Ho Song, and Robert Magnus- son. Critical field enhancement of asymptotic optical bound states in the continuum.Scientific Reports, 5: 18301, 2015. doi:10.1038/srep18301. URLhttps://doi. org/10.1038/srep18301

    work page doi:10.1038/srep18301 2015

  8. [8]

    Asymmetric metasurfaces with high-qresonances governed by bound states in the continuum.Physical Review Letters, 121:193903, 2018

    Kirill Koshelev, Sergey Lepeshov, Mingkai Liu, Andrey Bogdanov, and Yuri Kivshar. Asymmetric metasurfaces with high-qresonances governed by bound states in the continuum.Physical Review Letters, 121:193903, 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.193903. URLhttps:// doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.193903

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.193903 2018

  9. [9]

    Meng Kang, Tao Liu, C. T. Chan, and Meng Xiao. Applications of bound states in the continuum in pho- tonics.Nature Reviews Physics, 5:659–678, 2023. doi: 10.1038/s42254-023-00642-8. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1038/s42254-023-00642-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00642-8 2023

  10. [10]

    Lasing action from photonic bound states in continuum.Nature, 541(7636):196–199, 2017

    Ashok Kodigala, Thomas Lepetit, Qing Gu, Babak Ba- hari, Yeshaiahu Fainman, and Boubacar Kant´ e. Lasing action from photonic bound states in continuum.Nature, 541(7636):196–199, 2017. doi:10.1038/nature20799. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20799

    work page doi:10.1038/nature20799 2017

  11. [11]

    M. Luo, Y. Zhou, X. Zhao, Z. Guo, Y. Li, Q. Wang, J. Liu, W. Luo, Y. Shi, A. Q. Liu, and X. Wu. High- sensitivity optical sensors empowered by quasi-bound states in the continuum in a hybrid metal-dielectric metasurface.ACS Nano, 18(8):6477–6486, 2024. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c11994. URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1021/acsnano.3c11994

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c11994 2024

  12. [12]

    Tufarelli, F

    T. Tufarelli, F. Ciccarello, and M. S. Kim. Dynam- ics of spontaneous emission in a single-end photonic waveguide.Physical Review A, 87:013820, 2013. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.013820. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.013820

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.87.013820 2013

  13. [13]

    Paolo Facchi, M. S. Kim, Saverio Pascazio, Francesco V. Pepe, Domenico Pomarico, and Tommaso Tufarelli. Bound states and entanglement generation in waveg- uide quantum electrodynamics.Physical Review A, 94: 043839, 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.94.043839. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.043839

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.94.043839 2016

  14. [14]

    Fang, Harold U

    Giuseppe Calaj´ o, Yao-Lung L. Fang, Harold U. Baranger, and Francesco Ciccarello. Exciting a bound state in the continuum through multiphoton scattering plus delayed 6 quantum feedback.Physical Review Letters, 122:073601,

  15. [15]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.073601

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.073601. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.073601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.073601

  16. [16]

    Catch and release of propagating bosonic field with non-Markovian giant atom.New Journal of Physics, 26:013025, 2024

    Luting Xu and Lingzhen Guo. Catch and release of propagating bosonic field with non-Markovian giant atom.New Journal of Physics, 26:013025, 2024. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/ad18ed

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ad18ed 2024

  17. [17]

    Phase- controlled bound states in giant atom waveguide QED setup.Communications in Theoretical Physics, 77(11): 115102, 2025

    Xiaojun Zhang, Mingjie Zhu, and Zhihai Wang. Phase- controlled bound states in giant atom waveguide QED setup.Communications in Theoretical Physics, 77(11): 115102, 2025. doi:10.1088/1572-9494/addb2a

    work page doi:10.1088/1572-9494/addb2a 2025

  18. [18]

    Bound state in the continuum and multiple atom state transfer applications in a waveguide QED setup,

    Xiang Guo, Xiaojun Zhang, Mingzhu Weng, Qian Bin, Hao-di Liu, Hai-Jun Xing, Xin-You L¨ u, and Zhihai Wang. Bound state in the continuum and multiple atom state transfer applications in a waveguide QED setup,

  19. [19]

    arXiv:2512.06365 [quant-ph]

    arXiv

  20. [20]

    Strongly correlated two-photon transport in a one- dimensional waveguide coupled to a two-level system.Physical Review Letters, 98:153003,

    Jung-Tsung Shen and Shanhui Fan. Strongly correlated two-photon transport in a one- dimensional waveguide coupled to a two-level system.Physical Review Letters, 98:153003,

  21. [21]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.153003

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.153003. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.153003

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.153003

  22. [22]

    Chang, and J

    Tao Shi, Darrick E. Chang, and J. Ignacio Cirac. Multiphoton-scattering theory and generalized master equations.Physical Review A, 92:053834, 2015. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.053834. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.053834

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.92.053834 2015

  23. [23]

    D. Roy, C. M. Wilson, and O. Firstenberg. Colloquium: Strongly interacting photons in one-dimensional contin- uum.Reviews of Modern Physics, 89:021001, 2017. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.89.021001. URLhttps://doi. org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.021001

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.021001 2017

  24. [24]

    X. Gu, A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, Y.-x. Liu, and F. Nori. Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits.Physics Reports, 718–719:1–102, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.10.002. URLhttps://doi. org/10.1016/j.physrep.2017.10.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.10.002 2017

  25. [25]

    A. S. Sheremet, M. I. Petrov, I. V. Iorsh, A. V. Poshakin- skiy, and A. N. Poddubny. Waveguide quantum elec- trodynamics: Collective radiance and photon-photon correlations.Reviews of Modern Physics, 95:015002,

  26. [26]

    URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.015002

    doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.95.015002. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.015002

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.95.015002

  27. [27]

    Deterministic down-converter and continuous photon-pair source within the bad- cavity limit.Physical Review Letters, 117:203602,

    Yue Chang, Alejandro Gonz´ alez-Tudela, Car- los S´ anchez Mu˜ noz, Carlos Navarrete-Benlloch, and Tao Shi. Deterministic down-converter and continuous photon-pair source within the bad- cavity limit.Physical Review Letters, 117:203602,

  28. [28]

    Deterministic

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.203602. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.203602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.203602

  29. [29]

    Quantum beam split- ter as a controller of higher-order quantum coher- ence.Physical Review A, 110:023722, 2024

    Li-Ping Yang and Yue Chang. Quantum beam split- ter as a controller of higher-order quantum coher- ence.Physical Review A, 110:023722, 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.110.023722. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.110.023722

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.110.023722 2024

  30. [30]

    Maximilian Zanner, Tuure Orell, Christian M. F. Schnei- der, Romain Albert, Stefan Oleschko, Mathieu L. Juan, Matti Silveri, and Gerhard Kirchmair. Coherent con- trol of a multi-qubit dark state in waveguide quantum electrodynamics.Nature Physics, 18:538–543, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41567-022-01527-w. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41567-022-01527-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01527-w 2022

  31. [31]

    Ignacio Cirac

    Tao Shi, Ying-Hai Wu, Alejandro Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and J. Ignacio Cirac. Bound states in boson impu- rity models.Physical Review X, 6:021027, 2016. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.021027. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.021027

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.6.021027 2016

  32. [32]

    Ultrastrong coupling few-photon scattering theory

    Tao Shi, Yue Chang, and Juan Jos´ e Garc´ ıa-Ripoll. Ultrastrong coupling few-photon scattering theory. Physical Review Letters, 120:153602, 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.153602. URLhttps://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.153602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.153602 2018

  33. [33]

    A. F. Kockum, P. Delsing, and G. Johansson. Designing frequency-dependent relaxation rates and Lamb shifts for a giant artificial atom.Physical Review A, 90:013837,

  34. [34]

    URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.013837

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.90.013837. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.013837

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.90.013837

  35. [35]

    M. V. Gustafsson, T. Aref, A. F. Kockum, M. K. Ek- str¨ om, G. Johansson, and P. Delsing. Propagating phonons coupled to an artificial atom.Science, 346:207– 211, 2014. doi:10.1126/science.1257219. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1126/science.1257219

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1257219 2014

  36. [36]

    L. Guo, A. L. Grimsmo, A. F. Kockum, M. Ple- tyukhov, and G. Johansson. Giant acoustic atom: A single quantum system with a deterministic time delay.Physical Review A, 95:053821, 2017. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.053821. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.053821

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.95.053821 2017

  37. [37]

    A. F. Kockum, G. Johansson, and F. Nori. Decoherence-free interaction between giant atoms in waveguide quantum electrodynamics.Phys- ical Review Letters, 120:140404, 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.140404. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.140404

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.140404 2018

  38. [38]

    Kannan, M

    B. Kannan, M. J. Ruckriegel, D. L. Campbell, A. F. Kockum, J. Braum¨ uller, D. K. Kim, M. Kjaergaard, P. Krantz, A. Melville, B. M. Niedzielski, A. Veps¨ al¨ ainen, R. Winik, J. L. Yoder, F. Nori, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavs- son, and W. D. Oliver. Waveguide quantum electrody- namics with superconducting artificial giant atoms.Na- ture, 583:775–779, 2020. d...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2529-9 2020

  39. [39]

    In: Computer Vision – ECCV 2024: 18th Eu- ropean Conference, Milan, Italy, September 29–October 4, 2024, Proceedings, Part LXXIX

    Anton Frisk Kockum. Quantum optics with giant atoms—the first five years. InInternational Sympo- sium on Mathematics, Quantum Theory, and Cryptog- raphy, volume 33 ofMathematics for Industry, pages 125–146. Springer, Singapore, 2021. doi:10.1007/978- 981-15-5191-8˙12. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-981-15-5191-8_12

    work page doi:10.1007/978- 2021

  40. [40]

    Non-Markovian multiphoton chiral dynam- ics with giant systems.Communications Physics, 8:385,

    Yue Chang. Non-Markovian multiphoton chiral dynam- ics with giant systems.Communications Physics, 8:385,

  41. [41]

    URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1038/s42005-025-02293-w

    doi:10.1038/s42005-025-02293-w. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1038/s42005-025-02293-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-025-02293-w

  42. [42]

    Gonz´ alez-Ballestero, F

    C. Gonz´ alez-Ballestero, F. J. Garc´ ıa-Vidal, and E. Moreno. Non-Markovian effects in waveguide- mediated entanglement.New Journal of Physics, 15: 073015, 2013. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/7/073015. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/15/7/073015

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/7/073015 2013

  43. [43]

    Tunable chiral bound states with giant atoms.Physical Review Letters, 126:043602, 2021

    Xin Wang, Tao Liu, Anton Frisk Kockum, Hui-Ran Li, and Franco Nori. Tunable chiral bound states with giant atoms.Physical Review Letters, 126:043602, 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.043602. URLhttps://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.043602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.043602 2021

  44. [44]

    coherent control of an em- bedded bound state without a spectral gap

    Supplemental material for “coherent control of an em- bedded bound state without a spectral gap”, 2026. See Supplemental Material for derivations of the delay- differential equations for the atomic excitation and pho- tonic wavefunctions, the scattering states, and the adia- 7 batic leakage

    2026

  45. [45]

    J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, H. J. Kimble, and H. Mabuchi. Quantum state transfer and entanglement distribu- tion among distant nodes in a quantum network. Physical Review Letters, 78:3221–3224, 1997. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3221. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3221

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.3221 1997

  46. [46]

    Continuous genera- tion of single photons with controlled waveform in an ion-trap cavity system.Nature, 431:1075–1078, 2004

    Matthias Keller, Birgit Lange, Kazuhiro Hayasaka, Wolf- gang Lange, and Herbert Walther. Continuous genera- tion of single photons with controlled waveform in an ion-trap cavity system.Nature, 431:1075–1078, 2004. doi: 10.1038/nature02961. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ nature02961

    work page doi:10.1038/nature02961 2004

  47. [47]

    Shore, and Axel Kuhn

    Jerome Dilley, Peter Nisbet-Jones, Bruce W. Shore, and Axel Kuhn. Single-photon absorption in coupled atom- cavity systems.Physical Review A, 85:023834, 2012. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.023834. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.023834

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.85.023834 2012

  48. [48]

    H. Z. Shen, Y. Chen, T. Z. Luan, and X. X. Yi. Multiple single-photon generations in three-level atoms coupled to a cavity with non-markovian effects.Physical Review A, 107:053705, 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.107.053705. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.053705

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.107.053705 2023

  49. [49]

    Perfect excitation of a matter qubit by a single pho- ton in free space.EPL, 86:14007, 2009

    Magdalena Stobi´ nska, Gernot Alber, and Gerd Leuchs. Perfect excitation of a matter qubit by a single pho- ton in free space.EPL, 86:14007, 2009. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/86/14007. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1209/0295-5075/86/14007

    work page doi:10.1209/0295-5075/86/14007 2009