pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.19321 · v1 · pith:TZ4LFQZFnew · submitted 2026-06-17 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Spectral Functions of Lorentzian Quantum Gravity

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 19:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords spectral functionsquantum gravityasymptotic safetyfunctional renormalisation groupgraviton propagatorKällén-Lehmann representationLorentzian signatureunitarity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spectral functions for graviton modes stay normalisable from infrared to ultraviolet fixed point in Lorentzian quantum gravity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a direct computational route to spectral functions of graviton modes while remaining in Lorentzian signature. It adapts functional renormalisation group methods by adding symmetry conditions that enforce underlying Ward identities, then derives and solves the flow equations inside the Källén-Lehmann representation of the propagators. Consistent, normalisable spectra emerge for both the graviton and the scalar graviton mode under several choices of renormalisation conditions, and these spectra match the expectations of effective field theory at low energies. The same framework yields the quantum effective action to quadratic order in curvature, from which graviton-induced form factors are extracted. The results bear on whether quantum gravity can be formulated in a manner compatible with unitarity without an intermediate Euclidean continuation.

Core claim

We compute spectral functions of graviton modes in Lorentzian quantum gravity, interpolating between classical general relativity and an asymptotically safe ultraviolet fixed point. Using functional renormalisation adapted for theories in Lorentzian signature, and enhanced by new symmetry conditions to account for underlying Ward identities, we derive and solve flow equations directly for the Källén-Lehmann representation of propagators. Consistent results are found for several sets of renormalisation conditions yielding normalisable spectral functions for the graviton and the scalar graviton mode, in agreement with effective theory in the infrared. We further calculate the full quantum effe

What carries the argument

Flow equations solved directly inside the Källén-Lehmann spectral representation of the propagators, closed by new symmetry conditions that implement Ward identities in Lorentzian signature.

If this is right

  • Normalisable spectral functions exist for the graviton across the entire trajectory from the infrared to the ultraviolet fixed point.
  • The scalar graviton mode likewise possesses a normalisable spectrum under the same renormalisation conditions.
  • The quantum effective action can be obtained to quadratic order in curvature, supplying explicit graviton-induced form factors.
  • These spectral functions are compatible with the infrared behaviour of classical general relativity and therefore support unitarity of the theory.
  • Multiple independent sets of renormalisation conditions produce mutually consistent results.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same direct spectral method could be applied to other fields or to matter couplings within the same truncation.
  • Form factors extracted this way could be inserted into scattering calculations to test high-energy behaviour without Wick rotation.
  • If the normalisability persists under enlargement of the truncation, it would strengthen the case that asymptotic safety preserves unitarity in Lorentzian signature.

Load-bearing premise

The added symmetry conditions are sufficient to remove all residual inconsistencies that the Lorentzian signature would otherwise introduce into the flow equations.

What would settle it

An explicit solution of the flow equations in which the spectral function for the graviton or scalar mode develops a negative residue or becomes non-normalisable at some finite scale would falsify the consistency claim.

read the original abstract

We compute spectral functions of graviton modes in Lorentzian quantum gravity, interpolating between classical general relativity and an asymptotically safe ultraviolet fixed point. Using functional renormalisation adapted for theories in Lorentzian signature, and enhanced by new symmetry conditions to account for underlying Ward identities, we derive and solve flow equations directly for the K\"all\'en-Lehmann representation of propagators. Consistent results are found for several sets of renormalisation conditions yielding normalisable spectral functions for the graviton and the scalar graviton mode, in agreement with effective theory in the infrared. We further calculate the full quantum effective action to quadratic order in curvature, extract graviton-induced form factors, and discuss implications for unitarity of quantum gravity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes spectral functions for graviton and scalar graviton modes in Lorentzian quantum gravity via an adapted functional renormalization group (FRG) approach. New symmetry conditions are introduced to enforce underlying Ward identities, allowing flow equations to be derived and solved directly in the Källén-Lehmann representation. Consistent normalisable spectra are reported across multiple renormalization-condition sets, with infrared agreement to effective field theory; the quadratic quantum effective action is also extracted to obtain graviton-induced form factors and discuss unitarity.

Significance. If the central technical step holds, the work would provide the first explicit Lorentzian spectral functions in asymptotically safe gravity, bridging the ultraviolet fixed point to classical general relativity and supplying concrete input on unitarity. The reported consistency across several renormalization-condition sets is a methodological strength that reduces sensitivity to single-choice artifacts.

major comments (2)
  1. [Method and symmetry conditions (as described in abstract)] The load-bearing claim is that the newly introduced symmetry conditions suffice to close the FRG flow equations in the Källén-Lehmann representation without residual violations of analyticity or positivity requirements special to Lorentzian signature. The abstract states that these conditions are introduced precisely for this purpose, yet the manuscript must demonstrate explicitly (e.g., in the derivation of the flow equations) that the resulting spectral measure remains positive and that branch-cut structure is preserved; otherwise the normalisability result could be an artifact of the truncation.
  2. [Renormalization conditions] The renormalization conditions are treated as free parameters, and multiple sets are selected to produce normalisable spectra. While testing several sets is positive, the procedure risks post-hoc tuning; the manuscript should quantify how much the spectral functions vary when the conditions are varied within the range allowed by the symmetry constraints, rather than only reporting the sets that succeed.
minor comments (1)
  1. The infrared agreement with effective theory is stated qualitatively; a direct overlay of the computed spectral functions against the known low-energy graviton propagator would make the comparison sharper.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. Below we address each major comment point by point, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Method and symmetry conditions (as described in abstract)] The load-bearing claim is that the newly introduced symmetry conditions suffice to close the FRG flow equations in the Källén-Lehmann representation without residual violations of analyticity or positivity requirements special to Lorentzian signature. The abstract states that these conditions are introduced precisely for this purpose, yet the manuscript must demonstrate explicitly (e.g., in the derivation of the flow equations) that the resulting spectral measure remains positive and that branch-cut structure is preserved; otherwise the normalisability result could be an artifact of the truncation.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration of positivity and branch-cut preservation is essential to substantiate the central claim. While the symmetry conditions are constructed to enforce the relevant Ward identities and thereby maintain the Källén-Lehmann structure in the flow equations, the current manuscript presents this at the level of the derivation without a dedicated verification subsection. In the revised version we will add explicit checks: we will show that the flow preserves the required analytic properties by tracking the location of the branch cut and will demonstrate positivity of the spectral measure by direct evaluation at several renormalization scales, including a proof that the symmetry conditions prevent sign changes in the measure. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Renormalization conditions] The renormalization conditions are treated as free parameters, and multiple sets are selected to produce normalisable spectra. While testing several sets is positive, the procedure risks post-hoc tuning; the manuscript should quantify how much the spectral functions vary when the conditions are varied within the range allowed by the symmetry constraints, rather than only reporting the sets that succeed.

    Authors: We acknowledge the concern regarding potential post-hoc selection. The manuscript already explores several sets that satisfy the symmetry constraints and yield normalisable spectra, but does not provide a quantitative scan of the full allowed range. In the revision we will add a systematic variation: we will parameterise the allowed window for the renormalization conditions imposed by the symmetry requirements, sample multiple points inside that window, and report both the mean spectral functions and their variation (e.g., via shaded bands or tabulated spreads) to demonstrate robustness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Renormalisation conditions filtered to produce normalisable spectra

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "Consistent results are found for several sets of renormalisation conditions yielding normalisable spectral functions for the graviton and the scalar graviton mode, in agreement with effective theory in the infrared."

    The renormalisation conditions are not fixed a priori but are selected among tested sets precisely because they produce normalisable spectra. The reported spectral functions are therefore obtained by retaining only the inputs that enforce the desired output property, reducing the 'prediction' of normalisability to a consequence of the choice procedure.

full rationale

The central result (normalisable graviton and scalar spectral functions) is obtained after introducing new symmetry conditions and testing several sets of renormalisation conditions, with only those yielding normalisability retained. This selection step makes the reported normalisability a direct consequence of the input filtering rather than an independent output of the flow equations. The paper remains partially self-contained due to the IR agreement check and the explicit statement that multiple sets were examined, but the tuning procedure introduces moderate circularity burden. No self-citation chains or self-definitional equations were identifiable from the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the asymptotic-safety scenario for quantum gravity, the validity of the functional renormalization group truncation in Lorentzian signature, and the adequacy of the new symmetry conditions for Ward identities.

free parameters (1)
  • renormalization conditions
    Several sets of renormalization conditions are chosen to obtain normalisable spectral functions.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Functional renormalization group methods can be consistently adapted to Lorentzian signature when supplemented by symmetry conditions that enforce Ward identities.
    Invoked to justify deriving flow equations directly for the Källén-Lehmann representation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5642 in / 1336 out tokens · 31814 ms · 2026-06-26T19:42:01.701497+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

130 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The fixed-point values show some deviations: 100% for the Newton coupling, 22% and 15% for the fixed-point transverse-traceless mass parameter and anomalous dimension, respectively

    = (1.2,−0.95).(68c) This fixed point is qualitatively similar to (34), in particular, the real part of the critical exponents dif- fers by only 21%. The fixed-point values show some deviations: 100% for the Newton coupling, 22% and 15% for the fixed-point transverse-traceless mass parameter and anomalous dimension, respectively. The scalar-mode fixed-poin...

  2. [2]

    UIbkPYqcywOIzBIhbAww25oeXWE=

    Low and High Energies All transverse traceless mode spectral functions are shown in the top left panel of Fig.9. They display a uni- versal behaviour in the IR, exactly matching the one-loop result given in (41). They only differ in the crossover regime, and in the UV, where the on-shell spectral func- tion (iii) vanishes logarithmically faster than the s...

  3. [3]

    rA98DCysl+y9TstEDmNinaVf3a8=

    Positivity To identify the regions with a positive transverse- traceless spectral function, we perform the same type of scan as done previously in the decoupling limit, as shown in Fig.6. Our results from coupled systems are displayed in Fig.10. We begin with renormalisation con- ditions ( i) stated in (63). In this case, the anomalous dimensions coincide...

  4. [4]

    1− p2 Z ∞ 0 dλ λ ρTT(λ) λ2 +p 2 −1# , fR = c p2

    Coupled vs Decoupled Spectral Functions We briefly comment on new effects that arise due to the coupling between spectral functions. We remind the reader that, in the decoupled approximation, all gravi- ton modes are included, but identified with the running mode – either the transverse-traceless or the scalar one. This is resolved in the coupled approxim...

  5. [5]

    and [ 50] agree well numerically, despite differences in the underlying schemes. In the light of the preceding discussion, we believe the reason for this coincidence is that the UV scaling behaviour of the transverse-traceless spectral function observed in [ 48] agrees with the UV scaling found in [ 50], thereby resulting in a numerically comparable contr...

  6. [6]

    We display the flows in terms of Zh = ZTT = Z0 and ηh = ηTT = η0

    Flow equations form TT =m 0 andη TT =η 0 We show the flow equations in terms of the dimensionless momenta ˜p= p/mh and ˆp= p/k, where mh = mTT = m0 is the graviton mass. We display the flows in terms of Zh = ZTT = Z0 and ηh = ηTT = η0. The transverse-traceless two-point flows are ∂t(Γ(2) TT +S (2) ct, TT) tadpole = 0, ∂t(Γ(2) TT +S (2) ct, TT) 3-point (˜p...

  7. [7]

    For this we expand the flow equations in δm = mTT −m 0, and retain the information from which diagram they originate

    Cancellations in the limitm TT →m 0 We present the explicit cancellations that take place in the mTT →m 0 and lead to flows that respect the KL spectral representation as displayed in Fig.7. For this we expand the flow equations in δm = mTT −m 0, and retain the information from which diagram they originate. We label all terms following the numbering in Fi...

  8. [8]

    Newton coupling We extract the fully coupled Newton coupling beta function from the flow of the Euclidean graviton three-point function using a Litim cutoff, ∂tg= (3η TT + 2)g+g 2 " 53ηc −50 190π + 2 (η0 −8) 19π(µ 0 + 1) 3 − −46η0 (µ0 + 1) + 460µ0 + 505 38475π(µ 0 + 1) 5 + 547 (η0 −6) 1026π(µ 0 + 1) 2 + 1325 (ηTT −6) 1026π(µ TT + 1) 2 − 31 (ηTT −8) 54π(µ ...

  9. [9]

    The subleading IR behaviour is described by a logarithm in the propagator corresponding to a constant part in the spectral function

    IR scaling In the IR, the leading behaviour of the propagator is given by the classical 1 /p2 behaviour, corresponding to a delta-peak at λ = 0 in the spectral function. The subleading IR behaviour is described by a logarithm in the propagator corresponding to a constant part in the spectral function. The ratio between the leading and subleading behaviour...

  10. [10]

    either p = 0 or p2 = −m2 h

    UV scaling In this subsection, we derive the asymptotic UV scaling of spectral functions analytically, depending on the BPHZ subtraction points studied in this paper, i.e. either p = 0 or p2 = −m2 h. This covers all four systems in which we compute spectral functions, since the decoupled and coupled (i, ii) systems use p = 0 renormalisation. On the other ...

  11. [11]

    Weinberg,Ultraviolet divergences in quantum theories of gravitation, pp

    S. Weinberg,Ultraviolet divergences in quantum theories of gravitation, pp. 790–831. 1980

  12. [12]

    Reuter,Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity,Phys

    M. Reuter,Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 971 [hep-th/9605030]

  13. [13]

    D. F. Litim,Renormalisation group and the Planck scale,Phil.Trans.Roy.Soc.Lond.A369(2011) 2759 [1102.4624]

  14. [14]

    Wetterich,Exact evolution equation for the effective potential,Phys

    C. Wetterich,Exact evolution equation for the effective potential,Phys. Lett. B301(1993) 90 [1710.05815]

  15. [15]

    Reichert,Lecture notes: Functional Renormalisation Group and Asymptotically Safe Quantum Gravity,PoS 384(2020) 005

    M. Reichert,Lecture notes: Functional Renormalisation Group and Asymptotically Safe Quantum Gravity,PoS 384(2020) 005

  16. [16]

    Souma,Nontrivial ultraviolet fixed point in quantum gravity,Prog.Theor.Phys.102(1999) 181 [hep-th/9907027]

    W. Souma,Nontrivial ultraviolet fixed point in quantum gravity,Prog.Theor.Phys.102(1999) 181 [hep-th/9907027]

  17. [17]

    Reuter and F

    M. Reuter and F. Saueressig,Renormalization group flow of quantum gravity in the Einstein-Hilbert truncation,Phys. Rev.D65(2002) 065016 [hep-th/0110054]

  18. [18]

    Lauscher and M

    O. Lauscher and M. Reuter,Ultraviolet fixed point and generalized flow equation of quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 025013 [hep-th/0108040]

  19. [19]

    D. F. Litim,Fixed points of quantum gravity, Phys.Rev.Lett.92(2004) 201301 [hep-th/0312114]

  20. [20]

    Fischer and D

    P. Fischer and D. F. Litim,Fixed points of quantum gravity in extra dimensions,Phys.Lett.B638(2006) 497 [hep-th/0602203]

  21. [21]

    Donkin and J

    I. Donkin and J. M. Pawlowski,The phase diagram of quantum gravity from diffeomorphism-invariant RG-flows,1203.4207

  22. [22]

    Litim and A

    D. Litim and A. Satz,Limit cycles and quantum gravity, 1205.4218

  23. [23]

    Falls,Critical scaling in quantum gravity from the renormalisation group,1503.06233

    K. Falls,Critical scaling in quantum gravity from the renormalisation group,1503.06233

  24. [24]

    Falls,Renormalization of Newton’s constant,Phys

    K. Falls,Renormalization of Newton’s constant,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 124057 [1501.05331]

  25. [25]

    Falls,Physical renormalization schemes and asymptotic safety in quantum gravity,Phys

    K. Falls,Physical renormalization schemes and asymptotic safety in quantum gravity,Phys. Rev.D96 (2017) 126016 [1702.03577]

  26. [26]

    Baldazzi and K

    A. Baldazzi and K. Falls,Essential Quantum Einstein Gravity,Universe7(2021) 294 [2107.00671]

  27. [27]

    Kluth,Fixed points of quantum gravity from dimensional regularization,Phys

    Y. Kluth,Fixed points of quantum gravity from dimensional regularization,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 106010 [2409.09252]

  28. [28]

    Falls and R

    K. Falls and R. Ferrero,Asymptotic safety within on-shell perturbation theory,JHEP08(2025) 173 [2411.00938]

  29. [29]

    Lauscher and M

    O. Lauscher and M. Reuter,Is quantum Einstein gravity nonperturbatively renormalizable?,Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 483 [hep-th/0110021]

  30. [30]

    Codello, R

    A. Codello, R. Percacci and C. Rahmede,Ultraviolet properties of f(R)-gravity,Int. J. Mod. Phys.A23 (2008) 143 [0705.1769]

  31. [31]

    P. F. Machado and F. Saueressig,On the renormalization group flow of f(R)-gravity,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 124045 [0712.0445]

  32. [32]

    M. R. Niedermaier,Gravitational Fixed Points from Perturbation Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.103(2009) 101303

  33. [33]

    K. Groh, S. Rechenberger, F. Saueressig and O. Zanusso,Higher Derivative Gravity from the Universal Renormalization Group Machine,PoS EPS-HEP2011(2011) 124 [1111.1743]

  34. [34]

    Hindmarsh, D

    M. Hindmarsh, D. Litim and C. Rahmede, Asymptotically Safe Cosmology,JCAP07(2011) 019 [1101.5401]

  35. [35]

    Hindmarsh and I

    M. Hindmarsh and I. D. Saltas,f(R) Gravity from the renormalisation group,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 064029 [1203.3957]

  36. [36]

    Falls, D

    K. Falls, D. Litim, K. Nikolakopoulos and C. Rahmede, A bootstrap towards asymptotic safety,1301.4191

  37. [37]

    Falls, D

    K. Falls, D. F. Litim, K. Nikolakopoulos and C. Rahmede,Further evidence for asymptotic safety of quantum gravity,Phys. Rev.D93(2016) 104022 [1410.4815]

  38. [38]

    H. Gies, B. Knorr, S. Lippoldt and F. Saueressig, Gravitational Two-Loop Counterterm Is Asymptotically Safe,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 211302 [1601.01800]

  39. [39]

    Falls, D

    K. Falls, D. F. Litim, K. Nikolakopoulos and C. Rahmede,On de Sitter solutions in asymptotically safef(R)theories,Class. Quant. Grav.35(2018) 135006 [1607.04962]

  40. [40]

    Falls, C

    K. Falls, C. R. King, D. F. Litim, K. Nikolakopoulos and C. Rahmede,Asymptotic safety of quantum gravity beyond Ricci scalars,Phys. Rev.D97(2018) 086006 [1801.00162]

  41. [41]

    K. G. Falls, D. F. Litim and J. Schr¨ oder,Aspects of asymptotic safety for quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 126015 [1810.08550]. 28

  42. [42]

    Kluth and D

    Y. Kluth and D. F. Litim,Heat kernel coefficients on the sphere in any dimension,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 269 [1910.00543]

  43. [43]

    Kluth and D

    Y. Kluth and D. F. Litim,Fixed points of quantum gravity and the dimensionality of the UV critical surface,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 026005 [2008.09181]

  44. [44]

    Falls, N

    K. Falls, N. Ohta and R. Percacci,Towards the determination of the dimension of the critical surface in asymptotically safe gravity,Phys. Lett. B810(2020) 135773 [2004.04126]

  45. [45]

    Knorr,The derivative expansion in asymptotically safe quantum gravity: general setup and quartic order, SciPost Phys

    B. Knorr,The derivative expansion in asymptotically safe quantum gravity: general setup and quartic order, SciPost Phys. Core4(2021) 020 [2104.11336]

  46. [46]

    Kluth and D

    Y. Kluth and D. F. Litim,Functional renormalization for f(R µνρσ) quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 106022 [2202.10436]

  47. [47]

    T. R. Morris and D. Stulga,The Functional f(R) Approximation, inHandbook of Quantum Gravity, (Singapore), pp. 1–33, Springer Nature Singapore, (2023),2210.11356, DOI

  48. [48]

    Baldazzi, K

    A. Baldazzi, K. Falls, Y. Kluth and B. Knorr, Robustness of the derivative expansion in asymptotic safety,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 026005 [2312.03831]

  49. [49]

    Christiansen, D

    N. Christiansen, D. F. Litim, J. M. Pawlowski and A. Rodigast,Fixed points and infrared completion of quantum gravity,Phys. Lett. B728(2014) 114 [1209.4038]

  50. [50]

    Christiansen, B

    N. Christiansen, B. Knorr, J. M. Pawlowski and A. Rodigast,Global Flows in Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 044036 [1403.1232]

  51. [51]

    Christiansen, B

    N. Christiansen, B. Knorr, J. Meibohm, J. M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert,Local Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 121501 [1506.07016]

  52. [52]

    T. Denz, J. M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert,Towards apparent convergence in asymptotically safe quantum gravity,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 336 [1612.07315]

  53. [53]

    Christiansen, K

    N. Christiansen, K. Falls, J. M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert,Curvature dependence of quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 046007 [1711.09259]

  54. [54]

    Eichhorn, P

    A. Eichhorn, P. Labus, J. M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert,Effective universality in quantum gravity, SciPost Phys.5(2018) 031 [1804.00012]

  55. [55]

    Eichhorn, S

    A. Eichhorn, S. Lippoldt, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Reichert and M. Schiffer,How perturbative is quantum gravity?, Phys. Lett. B792(2019) 310 [1810.02828]

  56. [56]

    J. M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert,Quantum Gravity: A Fluctuating Point of View,Front. in Phys.8(2021) 551848 [2007.10353]

  57. [57]

    Knorr and M

    B. Knorr and M. Schiffer,Non-Perturbative Propagators in Quantum Gravity,Universe7(2021) 216 [2105.04566]

  58. [58]

    Bonanno, T

    A. Bonanno, T. Denz, J. M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert,Reconstructing the graviton,SciPost Phys. 12(2022) 001 [2102.02217]

  59. [59]

    J. M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert,Quantum Gravity from dynamical metric fluctuations, inHandbook of Quantum Gravity, (Singapore), Springer Nature Singapore, (9, 2023),2309.10785, DOI

  60. [60]

    Fehre, D

    J. Fehre, D. F. Litim, J. M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert, Lorentzian Quantum Gravity and the Graviton Spectral Function,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 081501 [2111.13232]

  61. [61]

    Braun et al.,Renormalised spectral flows,SciPost Phys

    J. Braun et al.,Renormalised spectral flows,SciPost Phys. Core6(2023) 061 [2206.10232]

  62. [62]

    D’Angelo and K

    E. D’Angelo and K. Rejzner,A Lorentzian Renormalization Group Equation for Gauge Theories, Annales Henri Poincare26(2025) 4411 [2303.01479]

  63. [63]

    D’Angelo,Asymptotic safety in Lorentzian quantum gravity,Phys

    E. D’Angelo,Asymptotic safety in Lorentzian quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 066012 [2310.20603]

  64. [64]

    Pastor-Guti´ errez, J

    A. Pastor-Guti´ errez, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Reichert and G. Ruisi,e+e-→µ+µ- in the asymptotically safe standard model,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 106005 [2412.13800]

  65. [65]

    V. Kher, B. King, D. F. Litim and M. Reichert,Matter Spectral Functions from Quantum Gravity,2507.17862

  66. [66]

    J. M. Pawlowski, M. Reichert and J. Wessely, Self-consistent graviton spectral function in Lorentzian quantum gravity,2507.22169

  67. [67]

    Saueressig and J

    F. Saueressig and J. Wang,Foliated asymptotically safe gravity: Lorentzian signature fluctuations from the Wick rotation,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 106007 [ 2501.03752]

  68. [68]

    D’Angelo, R

    E. D’Angelo, R. Ferrero and M. B. Fr¨ ob,De Sitter quantum gravity within the covariant Lorentzian approach to asymptotic safety,Class. Quant. Grav.42 (2025) 125008 [2502.05135]

  69. [69]

    A. P. Chiesa, J. M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert, Towards Two-to-Two Scattering of Scalars in Asymptotically Safe Quantum Gravity,2603.10168

  70. [70]

    Knorr,Asymptotically (un)safe scattering amplitudes from scratch: a deep dive into the IR jungle, 2602.21285

    B. Knorr,Asymptotically (un)safe scattering amplitudes from scratch: a deep dive into the IR jungle, 2602.21285

  71. [71]

    D. F. Litim and T. Plehn,Signatures of gravitational fixed points at the LHC,Phys.Rev.Lett.100(2008) 131301 [0707.3983]

  72. [72]

    Shaposhnikov and C

    M. Shaposhnikov and C. Wetterich,Asymptotic safety of gravity and the Higgs boson mass,Phys. Lett. B683 (2010) 196 [0912.0208]

  73. [73]

    Gerwick, D

    E. Gerwick, D. Litim and T. Plehn,Asymptotic safety and Kaluza-Klein gravitons at the LHC,Phys.Rev.D83 (2011) 084048 [1101.5548]

  74. [74]

    Folkerts, D

    S. Folkerts, D. F. Litim and J. M. Pawlowski, Asymptotic freedom of Yang-Mills theory with gravity, Phys. Lett. B709(2012) 234 [1101.5552]

  75. [75]

    Don` a, A

    P. Don` a, A. Eichhorn and R. Percacci,Matter matters in asymptotically safe quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D 89(2014) 084035 [1311.2898]

  76. [76]

    Meibohm, J

    J. Meibohm, J. M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert, Asymptotic safety of gravity-matter systems,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 084035 [1510.07018]

  77. [77]

    Eichhorn, S

    A. Eichhorn, S. Lippoldt and V. Skrinjar,Nonminimal hints for asymptotic safety,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 026002 [1710.03005]

  78. [78]

    Eichhorn, A

    A. Eichhorn, A. Held and J. M. Pawlowski, Quantum-gravity effects on a Higgs-Yukawa model, Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 104027 [1604.02041]

  79. [79]

    Christiansen and A

    N. Christiansen and A. Eichhorn,An asymptotically safe solution to the U(1) triviality problem,Phys. Lett. B770(2017) 154 [1702.07724]

  80. [80]

    Eichhorn and A

    A. Eichhorn and A. Held,Top mass from asymptotic safety,Phys. Lett. B777(2018) 217 [1707.01107]

Showing first 80 references.