pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20337 · v1 · pith:UXCZOWJ2new · submitted 2026-06-18 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM

Instruments for Focal Plane X-Ray Polarimetry in the Next Decade

Fabio Muleri , Stefano Cesare , Enrico Costa , Walter Cugno , Klaus Desch , Alessandro Di Marco , Sergio Fabiani , Riccardo Ferrazzoli
show 13 more authors
Markus Gruber Daniel Heuchel Saba Imtiaz Jochen Kaminski Dawoon Edwin Kim Alessandro Lacerenza Carlo Lefevre Hemanth Manikantan Vladislavs Plesanovs John Rankin Ajay Ratheesh Alda Rubini Paolo Soffitta
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 15:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM
keywords X-ray polarimetryfocal-plane instrumentsmultilayer mirrorsphotoelectric polarimeterCompton polarimeterIXPE missionspace instrumentation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A focal-plane polarimeter using multilayer mirrors and stacked detectors extends X-ray polarization measurements to tens of keV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper describes the development of a focal-plane polarimeter to extend the energy range of the IXPE mission up to tens of keV while improving sensitivity and lowering background. It proposes using multilayer mirrors together with a stack of either a low- or medium-energy imaging photoelectric polarimeter and an active Compton polarimeter. This approach builds on hardware components that have already flown in space. A sympathetic reader would care because the IXPE results have demonstrated the scientific value of X-ray polarimetry, yet many topics require higher energies and better performance that could be delivered on a relatively short development timeline.

Core claim

The design is based on the use of multilayer mirrors and stacked instrumentation, comprising either a low- or medium-energy imaging photoelectric polarimeter and an active Compton polarimeter. Such an approach relies on hardware with flight heritage and has the potential to answer compelling scientific questions and to soon become competitive from the point of view of feasibility for space applications.

What carries the argument

Multilayer mirrors combined with a stacked configuration of an imaging photoelectric polarimeter and an active Compton polarimeter that together provide extended energy coverage.

If this is right

  • Extends X-ray polarization measurements to tens of keV.
  • Delivers higher sensitivity than current instruments.
  • Reduces background levels in the focal plane.
  • Relies on components with prior flight heritage for faster development.
  • Becomes competitive for space applications on a short timescale.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The single focal-plane stack might enable broadband polarimetry without requiring separate instruments for different energy bands.
  • Emphasis on heritage components could shorten the timeline for deploying polarimeters on future X-ray missions.
  • The design might first be validated through balloon-borne or small-satellite tests before full orbital deployment.

Load-bearing premise

Hardware with existing flight heritage can be successfully adapted and integrated into a stacked focal-plane configuration that simultaneously achieves extended energy coverage, higher sensitivity, and lower background.

What would settle it

A laboratory or flight demonstration of the integrated stacked instrument that meets the target sensitivity and background levels across the extended energy band would support the claim; failure to reach those performance metrics during integration would challenge it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.20337 by Ajay Ratheesh, Alda Rubini, Alessandro Di Marco, Alessandro Lacerenza, Carlo Lefevre, Daniel Heuchel, Dawoon Edwin Kim, Enrico Costa, Fabio Muleri, Hemanth Manikantan, Jochen Kaminski, John Rankin, Klaus Desch, Markus Gruber, Paolo Soffitta, Riccardo Ferrazzoli, Saba Imtiaz, Sergio Fabiani, Stefano Cesare, Vladislavs Plesanovs, Walter Cugno.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Operation of a photoelectric polarimeter with the Gas Pixel Detector design. X-rays enter a gas cell passing through a window and are converted into photoelectrons. These propagate in the gas mixture, ionizing atoms along the way. Primary electrons are collected with a drift field, multiplied with a Gas Electron Multiplier (GEM), and eventually imaged by a pixellated ASIC. (b) A real photoelectron trac… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Key technologies of the GridPix detector. Panel (a) shows the Timepix3 ASIC bonded to its read-out board. Panel (b) provides a scanning-electron-microscope view of the InGrid multiplication stage, built directly on the Timepix3. It features a metallic mesh built on top of electrically insulating pillars: electron multiplication occurs in the region delimited by the mesh and the ASIC. A collaboration betwee… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Picture of the set-up for the thermovacuum tests of the InGrid (a) and the temperature as a function of time during the thermal loops (b). The temperature was cycled from +5 to +40 ◦C, with a peak at 55 ◦C. (c) Vibration profile for the vibration test of the same item. The test was carried out at the qualification level (blue curve), instead of the lower acceptance level (orange line). https://doi.org/10.3… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) The GridPix mounted in one of the INAF-IAPS X-ray test facilities. (b) The gas mixture system at INAF-IAPS used to flow different mixtures inside the GridPix. (a) (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) The new design optimized for studying the application of the GridPix to X-ray polarime￾try. (b) Mechanical parts being assembled in the INAF-IAPS clean room. We obtained the relation between measured and expected flux by increasing, in a controlled way, the high-voltage and current settings of an X-ray tube with an iron anode, emitting at 6.4 keV. The relation remains linear at least up to ∼7000 counts… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Relation between the measured rate and the expected flux increase (blue dots) derived by changing in a controlled way the high-voltage and current settings of an X-ray tube with an iron anode. Dashed line represents the expected linear increase. The GridPix was filled with an Argon+CO2 mixture at 1 bar and the gas cell was 1 cm thick. Statistical uncertainties are shown but are not visible. (b) Gain as… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Tracks measured with the GridPix at 17.4 keV: “usual” two-dimensional projection (a) and an example of three-dimensional reconstruction (b). 3. Polarimetry Beyond 30 keV GridPix detectors filled with appropriate argon-based gas mixtures can operate up to ∼30 keV. Beyond this energy, polarization is usually measured using Compton scat￾tering [51]. Compton polarimeters have been developed for more than 50 ye… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Possible implementation of a Compton polarimeter for a focal-plane application. Incident photons (in blue) scatter in a low-atomic-number detector and are then absorbed in a second detector (in red), which provides the azimuthal scattering direction φ, correlated with the polarization of the incident photon. 4. A Mission Concept for Fast Imaging Polarimetry in a Wide Energy Range The specifications and the… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) Accommodation of the assumed mirrors, with a focal length of 10 m, in the fairing of the Ariane 6 launcher. (b) Comparison of the total mirror area with IXPE. Two mirrors are assumed to be dedicated to polarimetry in the soft X-ray band, while three are used in the medium-energy interval to compensate for the typical decrease of flux from celestial sources with energy. In total, the payload comprises t… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The successful detection of X-ray polarization from many celestial sources belonging to different classes by the IXPE mission has opened a new window in X-ray astronomy. While an impressive number of scientific topics have already been addressed by IXPE, many of them would benefit from a new class of instrumentation that could be launched on a relatively short time scale. In this contribution, we present the development activities of a focal-plane polarimeter whose goal is to extend the energy range of IXPE up to tens of keV, with better sensitivity and lower background. Our design is based on the use of multilayer mirrors and stacked instrumentation, comprising either a low- or medium-energy imaging photoelectric polarimeter and an active Compton polarimeter. Such an approach relies on hardware with flight heritage and -- although still under development for the specific application in X-ray polarimetry -- it has the potential to answer compelling scientific questions and to soon become competitive from the point of view of feasibility for space applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents development activities for a focal-plane X-ray polarimeter concept to extend the IXPE mission's energy coverage up to tens of keV. The design relies on multilayer mirrors combined with a stacked configuration of either a low- or medium-energy imaging photoelectric polarimeter and an active Compton polarimeter, drawing on hardware with flight heritage to target improved sensitivity and reduced background while remaining competitive for near-term space applications.

Significance. If successfully realized, the proposed approach could open new observational capabilities in X-ray polarimetry by extending the energy band and leveraging proven technologies, thereby addressing additional scientific questions on a relatively short development timeline. The emphasis on flight-heritage components is a constructive element that supports the feasibility argument.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claims of 'better sensitivity and lower background' are presented without any quantitative simulations, performance estimates, measured data, or error budgets to support them; this is load-bearing for assessing whether the stacked design can deliver the stated advantages and become competitive for space applications.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and the recommendation for major revision. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claims of 'better sensitivity and lower background' are presented without any quantitative simulations, performance estimates, measured data, or error budgets to support them; this is load-bearing for assessing whether the stacked design can deliver the stated advantages and become competitive for space applications.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract makes forward-looking claims about sensitivity and background without accompanying quantitative support in the current text. The manuscript is a conceptual design paper describing development activities that draw on flight-heritage hardware; the qualitative advantages are argued from the stacked architecture and component heritage rather than from new end-to-end simulations. To address the concern, we will revise the abstract to qualify the language (e.g., “has the potential to provide improved sensitivity and reduced background”) and will add a brief forward reference to planned performance modeling. If space permits in revision, we can also include order-of-magnitude estimates derived from the heritage instruments already cited. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; proposal paper with no derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The manuscript is an instrumentation concept proposal describing a stacked focal-plane design using multilayer mirrors, heritage photoelectric polarimeters, and Compton polarimeters. No equations, quantitative predictions, or first-principles derivations are presented that could reduce to fitted inputs or self-citations. The central claim is a forward-looking feasibility assessment relying on existing flight heritage hardware, with no load-bearing steps that equate outputs to inputs by construction. This is the expected outcome for a status-report-style paper without empirical modeling or parameter fitting.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an instrumentation proposal paper. No free parameters, mathematical axioms, or new physical entities are introduced or fitted.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5779 in / 1085 out tokens · 34831 ms · 2026-06-26T15:36:22.231706+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [5]

    Conclusions IXPE, with its unique capability of measuring polarization in the soft X-ray energy range, is providing outstanding insights into a number of scientific topics, ranging from the geometry of X-ray sources to the physical conditions in their environments. Next- generation instruments will need to extend the energy range of the measurements in or...

    work page doi:10.3390/particles1010000

  2. [6]

    Longair, M.S.High Energy Astrophysics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011

    2011

  3. [7]

    Polarization and Polarimetry: A Review.J

    Trippe, S. Polarization and Polarimetry: A Review.J. Korean Astron. Soc.2014,47, 15. https://doi.org/10.5303/JKAS.2014.47.1.15

    work page doi:10.5303/jkas.2014.47.1.15 2014

  4. [8]

    M., 2009a, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13999.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.392..181K 392, 181

    Dovˇ ciak, M.; Muleri, F.; Goosmann, R.W.; Karas, V .; Matt, G. Thermal disc emission from a rotating black hole: X-ray polarization signatures.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2008,391, 32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13872.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13872.x 2008

  5. [9]

    Probing magnetar magnetosphere through X-ray polarization measurements.Mon

    Taverna, R.; Muleri, F.; Turolla, R.; Soffitta, P .; Fabiani, S.; Nobili, L. Probing magnetar magnetosphere through X-ray polarization measurements.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2014,438, 1686. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt2310

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2310 2014

  6. [10]

    Astronomical X-ray Polarimetry as a diagnostic for questions of fundamental Physics

    Soffitta, P .; Costa, E. Astronomical X-ray Polarimetry as a diagnostic for questions of fundamental Physics. In Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP2024), Prague, Czech Republic, 18–24 July 2024; Volume 476, p. 684. https://doi.org/10.22323/1.476.0684

    work page doi:10.22323/1.476.0684 2024

  7. [11]

    Detection of X-Ray Polarization of the Crab Nebula.Astrophys

    Novick, R.; Weisskopf, M.C.; Berthelsdorf, R.; Linke, R.; Wolff, R.S. Detection of X-Ray Polarization of the Crab Nebula.Astrophys. J.1972,174, L1

    1972

  8. [12]

    Measurement of the X-ray polarization of the Crab Nebula.Astrophys

    Weisskopf, M.C.; Cohen, G.G.; Kestenbaum, H.L.; Long, K.S.; Novick, R.; Wolff, R.S. Measurement of the X-ray polarization of the Crab Nebula.Astrophys. J.1976,208, L125

    1976

  9. [13]

    Re-detection and a possible time variation of soft X-ray polarization from the Crab.Nat

    Feng, H.; Li, H.; Long, X.; Bellazzini, R.; Costa, E.; Wu, Q.; Huang, J.; Jiang, W.; Minuti, M.; Wang, W.; et al. Re-detection and a possible time variation of soft X-ray polarization from the Crab.Nat. Astron.2020,4, 511–516. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-0 20-1088-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-0 2020

  10. [14]

    A Significant Detection of X-ray Polarization in Sco X-1 with PolarLight and Constraints on the Corona Geometry.Astrophys

    Long, X.; Feng, H.; Li, H.; Zhu, J.; Wu, Q.; Huang, J.; Minuti, M.; Jiang, W.; Yang, D.; Citraro, S.; et al. A Significant Detection of X-ray Polarization in Sco X-1 with PolarLight and Constraints on the Corona Geometry.Astrophys. J.2022,924, L13. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac4673

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac4673 2022

  11. [15]

    Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , keywords =

    Weisskopf, M.C.; Soffitta, P .; Baldini, L.; Ramsey, B.D.; O’Dell, S.L.; Romani, R.W.; Matt, G.; Deininger, W.D.; Baumgartner, W.H.; Bellazzini, R.; et al. Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer: Prelaunch.J. Astron. T elesc. Instruments Syst.2022,8, 026002. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JATIS.8.2.026002

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jatis.8.2.026002 2022

  12. [16]

    The Instrument of the Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer.Astron

    Soffitta, P .; Baldini, L.; Bellazzini, R.; Costa, E.; Latronico, L.; Muleri, F.; Del Monte, E.; Fabiani, S.; Minuti, M.; Pinchera, M.; et al. The Instrument of the Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer.Astron. J.2021,162, 208. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ac19b0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac19b0 2021

  13. [17]

    Science , keywords =

    Krawczynski, H.; Muleri, F.; Dovˇ ciak, M.; Veledina, A.; Rodriguez Cavero, N.; Svoboda, J.; Ingram, A.; Matt, G.; Garcia, J.A.; Loktev, V .; et al. Polarized X-rays constrain the disk-jet geometry in the black hole X-ray binary Cygnus X-1.Science2022, 378, 650–654. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.add5399

    work page doi:10.1126/science.add5399

  14. [18]

    Accretion geometry of the neutron star low mass X-ray binary Cyg X-2 from X-ray polarization measurements.Mon

    Farinelli, R.; Fabiani, S.; Poutanen, J.; Ursini, F.; Ferrigno, C.; Bianchi, S.; Cocchi, M.; Capitanio, F.; De Rosa, A.; Gnarini, A.; et al. Accretion geometry of the neutron star low mass X-ray binary Cyg X-2 from X-ray polarization measurements.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2023,519, 3681–3690. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac3726. https://doi.org/10.3390/...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3726 2023

  15. [19]

    , keywords =

    Ursini, F.; Marinucci, A.; Matt, G.; Bianchi, S.; Marin, F.; Marshall, H.L.; Middei, R.; Poutanen, J.; Rogantini, D.; De Rosa, A.; et al. Mapping the circumnuclear regions of the Circinus galaxy with the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2023,519, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac3189

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3189 2023

  16. [20]

    Polarized blazar X-rays imply particle acceleration in shocks.Nature2022,611, 677–681

    Liodakis, I.; Marscher, A.P .; Agudo, I.; Berdyugin, A.V .; Bernardos, M.I.; Bonnoli, G.; Borman, G.A.; Casadio, C.; Casanova, V .; Cavazzuti, E.; et al. Polarized blazar X-rays imply particle acceleration in shocks.Nature2022,611, 677–681. https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05338-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05338-0

  17. [21]

    Discovery of X-ray polarization angle rotation in the jet from blazar Mrk 421.Nat

    Di Gesu, L.; Marshall, H.L.; Ehlert, S.R.; Kim, D.E.; Donnarumma, I.; Tavecchio, F.; Liodakis, I.; Kiehlmann, S.; Agudo, I.; Jorstad, S.G.; et al. Discovery of X-ray polarization angle rotation in the jet from blazar Mrk 421.Nat. Astron.2023,7, 1245–1258. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02032-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02032-7 2023

  18. [22]

    Polarized X-rays from a magnetar.Science2022,378, 646–650

    Taverna, R.; Turolla, R.; Muleri, F.; Heyl, J.; Zane, S.; Baldini, L.; González-Caniulef, D.; Bachetti, M.; Rankin, J.; Caiazzo, I.; et al. Polarized X-rays from a magnetar.Science2022,378, 646–650. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.add0080

    work page doi:10.1126/science.add0080

  19. [23]

    General-relativistic precession in a black-hole binary.Nature2022,610, 652–655

    Xie, F.; Di Marco, A.; La Monaca, F.; Liu, K.; Muleri, F.; Bucciantini, N.; Romani, R.W.; Costa, E.; Rankin, J.; Soffitta, P .; et al. Vela pulsar wind nebula X-rays are polarized to near the synchrotron limit.Nature2022,612, 658–660. https://doi.org/10.1038/s415 86-022-05476-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s415

  20. [24]

    2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 602, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-01936-8

    Bucciantini, N.; Ferrazzoli, R.; Bachetti, M.; Rankin, J.; Di Lalla, N.; Sgrò, C.; Omodei, N.; Kitaguchi, T.; Mizuno, T.; Gunji, S.; et al. Simultaneous space and phase resolved X-ray polarimetry of the Crab pulsar and nebula.Nat. Astron.2023,7, 602–610. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-01936-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01936-8 2023

  21. [25]

    Discovery of a Shock-compressed Magnetic Field in the Northwestern Rim of the Young Supernova Remnant RX J1713.7–3946 with X-Ray Polarimetry.Astrophys

    Ferrazzoli, R.; Prokhorov, D.; Bucciantini, N.; Slane, P .; Vink, J.; Cardillo, M.; Yang, Y.J.; Silvestri, S.; Zhou, P .; Costa, E.; et al. Discovery of a Shock-compressed Magnetic Field in the Northwestern Rim of the Young Supernova Remnant RX J1713.7–3946 with X-Ray Polarimetry.Astrophys. J.2024,967, L38. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad4a68

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad4a68 2024

  22. [26]

    Determination of X-ray pulsar geometry with IXPE polarimetry.Nat

    Doroshenko, V .; Poutanen, J.; Tsygankov, S.S.; Suleimanov, V .F.; Bachetti, M.; Caiazzo, I.; Costa, E.; Di Marco, A.; Heyl, J.; La Monaca, F.; et al. Determination of X-ray pulsar geometry with IXPE polarimetry.Nat. Astron.2022,6, 1433–1443. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01799-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01799-5 2022

  23. [27]

    X-ray polarization evidence for a 200-year-old flare of Sgr A ∗.Nature2023,619, 41–45

    Marin, F.; Churazov, E.; Khabibullin, I.; Ferrazzoli, R.; Di Gesu, L.; Barnouin, T.; Di Marco, A.; Middei, R.; Vikhlinin, A.; Costa, E.; et al. X-ray polarization evidence for a 200-year-old flare of Sgr A ∗.Nature2023,619, 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023 -06064-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023

  24. [28]

    Considerations on Possible Directions for a Wide Band Polarimetry X-ray Mission.Galaxies2024,12, 47

    Soffitta, P .; Costa, E.; De Angelis, N.; Del Monte, E.; Desch, K.; Di Marco, A.; Di Persio, G.; Fabiani, S.; Ferrazzoli, R.; Gruber, M.; et al. Considerations on Possible Directions for a Wide Band Polarimetry X-ray Mission.Galaxies2024,12, 47. https: //doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12040047

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies12040047

  25. [29]

    2023, ApJL, 944, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acb703 1, 3.3, 3.3, 4, 5.4

    Zane, S.; Taverna, R.; González-Caniulef, D.; Muleri, F.; Turolla, R.; Heyl, J.; Uchiyama, K.; Ng, M.; Tamagawa, T.; Caiazzo, I.; et al. A Strong X-Ray Polarization Signal from the Magnetar 1RXS J170849.0-400910.Astrophys. J.2023,944, L27. https: //doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acb703

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acb703 2023

  26. [30]

    Discovery of a strong rotation of the X-ray polarization angle in the galactic burster GX 13+1.Astron

    Bobrikova, A.; Forsblom, S.V .; Di Marco, A.; La Monaca, F.; Poutanen, J.; Ng, M.; Ravi, S.; Loktev, V .; Kajava, J.J.E.; Ursini, F.; et al. Discovery of a strong rotation of the X-ray polarization angle in the galactic burster GX 13+1.Astron. Astrophys.2024,688, A170. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449318

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449318 2024

  27. [31]

    Design, construction, and test of the Gas Pixel Detectors for the IXPE mission.Astropart

    Baldini, L.; Barbanera, M.; Bellazzini, R.; Bonino, R.; Borotto, F.; Brez, A.; Caporale, C.; Cardelli, C.; Castellano, S.; Ceccanti, M.; et al. Design, construction, and test of the Gas Pixel Detectors for the IXPE mission.Astropart. Phys.2021,133, 102628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2021.102628

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2021.102628 2021

  28. [32]

    An efficient photoelectric X-ray polarimeter for the study of black holes and neutron stars.Nature2001,411, 662

    Costa, E.; Soffitta, P .; Bellazzini, R.; Brez, A.; Lumb, N.; Spandre, G. An efficient photoelectric X-ray polarimeter for the study of black holes and neutron stars.Nature2001,411, 662

  29. [33]

    Direct reading of charge multipliers with a self-triggering CMOS analog chip with 105 k pixels at 50 µm pitch.Nucl

    Bellazzini, R.; Spandre, G.; Minuti, M.; Baldini, L.; Brez, A.; Cavalca, F.; Latronico, L.; Omodei, N.; Massai, M.M.; Sgro’, C.; et al. Direct reading of charge multipliers with a self-triggering CMOS analog chip with 105 k pixels at 50 µm pitch.Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. A2006,566, 552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2006.07.036

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2006.07.036 2006

  30. [34]

    A sealed Gas Pixel Detector for X-ray astronomy.Nucl

    Bellazzini, R.; Spandre, G.; Minuti, M.; Baldini, L.; Brez, A.; Latronico, L.; Omodei, N.; Razzano, M.; Massai, M.M.; Pesce- Rollins, M.; et al. A sealed Gas Pixel Detector for X-ray astronomy.Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. A2007,579, 853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2007.05.304

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2007.05.304 2007

  31. [35]

    Analysis of the data from photoelectric gas polarimeters

    Muleri, F. Analysis of the data from photoelectric gas polarimeters. InHandbook of X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Astrophysics; Bambi, C., Santangelo, A., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_143-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_143-1 2022

  32. [36]

    An Algorithm to Calibrate and Correct the Response to Unpolarized Radiation of the X-Ray Polarimeter Onboard IXPE.Astron

    Rankin, J.; Muleri, F.; Tennant, A.F.; Bachetti, M.; Costa, E.; Di Marco, A.; Fabiani, S.; La Monaca, F.; Soffitta, P .; Tobia, A.; et al. An Algorithm to Calibrate and Correct the Response to Unpolarized Radiation of the X-Ray Polarimeter Onboard IXPE.Astron. J. 2022,163, 39. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ac397f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac397f 2022

  33. [37]

    Unlocking the Future of X-Ray Polarimetry with IXPE: Lessons Learned and Next Steps.Particles2026,9, 2

    Soffitta, P .; Costa, E.; Del Monte, E.; Di Marco, A.; Fabiani, S.; Ferrazzoli, R.; La Monaca, F.; Muleri, F.; Rubini, A.; Trois, A. Unlocking the Future of X-Ray Polarimetry with IXPE: Lessons Learned and Next Steps.Particles2026,9, 2. https: //doi.org/10.3390/particles9010002. https://doi.org/10.3390/particles1010000 Particles2026,1, 0 14 of 15

    work page doi:10.3390/particles9010002

  34. [38]

    Cygnus X-3 revealed as a Galactic ultraluminous X-ray source by IXPE.Nat

    Veledina, A.; Muleri, F.; Poutanen, J.; Podgorný, J.; Dovˇ ciak, M.; Capitanio, F.; Churazov, E.; De Rosa, A.; Di Marco, A.; Forsblom, S.V .; et al. Cygnus X-3 revealed as a Galactic ultraluminous X-ray source by IXPE.Nat. Astron.2024,8, 1031–1046. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-024-02294-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02294-9 2024

  35. [39]

    XPOL-III: A new-generation VLSI CMOS ASIC for high-throughput X-ray polarimetry.Nucl

    Minuti, M.; Baldini, L.; Bellazzini, R.; Brez, A.; Ceccanti, M.; Krummenacher, F.; Latronico, L.; Lucchesi, L.; Manfreda, A.; Orsini, L.; et al. XPOL-III: A new-generation VLSI CMOS ASIC for high-throughput X-ray polarimetry.Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. A2023,1046, 167674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2022.167674

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2022.167674 2022

  36. [40]

    GridPix: An integrated readout system for gaseous detectors with a pixel chip as anode.Nucl

    van der Graaf, H. GridPix: An integrated readout system for gaseous detectors with a pixel chip as anode.Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. A2007,580, 1023–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2007.06.096

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2007.06.096 2007

  37. [41]

    Gaseous detectors with micropattern gas amplification stages and CMOS pixel chip readout.J

    Kaminski, J.; Brezina, C.; Desch, K.; Killenberg, M.; Krautscheid, T.; Krieger, C.; Müller, F.; Schultens, M. Gaseous detectors with micropattern gas amplification stages and CMOS pixel chip readout.J. Instrum.2012,7, C02035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0 221/7/02/C02035

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0 2012

  38. [42]

    A GridPix-based X-ray detector for the CAST experiment.Nucl

    Krieger, C.; Kaminski, J.; Lupberger, M.; Desch, K. A GridPix-based X-ray detector for the CAST experiment.Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. A2017,867, 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2017.04.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2017.04.007 2017

  39. [43]

    X-ray detectors for the BabyIAXO solar axion search.Nucl

    Altenmüller, K.; Biasuzzi, B.; Castel, J.F.; Cebrián, S.; Dafni, T.; Desch, K.; Díez-Ibañez, D.; Ferrer-Ribas, E.; Galan, J.; Galindo, J.; et al. X-ray detectors for the BabyIAXO solar axion search.Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. A2023,1048, 167913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2022.167913

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2022.167913 2022

  40. [44]

    Timepix3: A 65K channel hybrid pixel readout chip with simultaneous ToA/ToT and sparse readout.J

    Poikela, T.; Plosila, J.; Westerlund, T.; Campbell, M.; De Gaspari, M.; Llopart, X.; Gromov, V .; Kluit, R.; van Beuzekom, M.; Zappon, F.; et al. Timepix3: A 65K channel hybrid pixel readout chip with simultaneous ToA/ToT and sparse readout.J. Instrum.2014, 9, C05013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/9/05/C05013

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/05/c05013 2014

  41. [45]

    InGrid-based X-ray detector for low background searches.Nucl

    Krieger, C.; Kaminski, J.; Desch, K. InGrid-based X-ray detector for low background searches.Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. A2013,729, 905–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2013.08.075

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2013.08.075 2013

  42. [46]

    The legacy of IXPE: Directions towards a new generation of 3D photo-electric X-ray polarimetry missions

    Ratheesh, A.; Soffitta, P .; Costa, E.; Del Monte, E.; Di Marco, A.; Di Persio, G.; Desch, K.; De Angelis, N.; Kim, D.E.; Fabiani, S.; et al. The legacy of IXPE: Directions towards a new generation of 3D photo-electric X-ray polarimetry missions. InSpace T elescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray; den Herder, J.W.A., Nikzad, S., Nakaza...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3020552 2024

  43. [47]

    The legacy of the IXPE instrument and prospects for the next generation of polarimetric photoelectric X-ray detectors

    Manikantan, H.; Plesanovs, V .; Soffitta, P .; Sauerland, D.; Beck, R.; Costa, E.; Del Monte, E.; Desch, K.; Di Marco, A.; Fabiani, S.; et al. The legacy of the IXPE instrument and prospects for the next generation of polarimetric photoelectric X-ray detectors. InHard X-Ray, Gamma-Ray, and Neutron Detector Physics XXVII; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2025; V...

    2025

  44. [48]

    Low energy polarization sensitivity of the Gas Pixel Detector.Nucl

    Muleri, F.; Soffitta, P .; Baldini, L.; Bellazzini, R.; Bregeon, J.; Brez, A.; Costa, E.; Frutti, M.; Latronico, L.; Minuti, M.; et al. Low energy polarization sensitivity of the Gas Pixel Detector.Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. A2008,584, 149. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2007.09.046

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2007.09.046 2007

  45. [49]

    The IXPE instrument calibration equipment.Astropart

    Muleri, F.; Piazzolla, R.; Di Marco, A.; Fabiani, S.; La Monaca, F.; Lefevre, C.; Morbidini, A.; Rankin, J.; Soffitta, P .; Tobia, A.; et al. The IXPE instrument calibration equipment.Astropart. Phys.2022,136, 102658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2021.102 658

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2021.102 2022

  46. [50]

    An X-ray polarimeter for hard X-ray optics

    Muleri, F.; Bellazzini, R.; Costa, E.; Soffitta, P .; Lazzarotto, F.; Feroci, M.; Pacciani, L.; Rubini, A.; Morelli, E.; Baldini, L.; et al. An X-ray polarimeter for hard X-ray optics. InSpace T elescopes and Instrumentation II: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2006; Volume 6266, p. 62662X. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.671975

    work page doi:10.1117/12.671975 2006

  47. [51]

    Performance of an Ar-DME imaging photoelectric polarimeter

    Fabiani, S.; Bellazzini, R.; Berrilli, F.; Brez, A.; Costa, E.; Minuti, M.; Muleri, F.; Pinchera, M.; Rubini, A.; Soffitta, P .; et al. Performance of an Ar-DME imaging photoelectric polarimeter. InSpace T elescopes and Instrumentation 2012: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2012; Volume 8443, p. 84431C. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.925374

    work page doi:10.1117/12.925374 2012

  48. [52]

    Sensitivity of a photoelectric X-ray polarimeter for astronomy: The impact of the gas mixture and pressure

    Pacciani, L.; Costa, E.; Di Persio, G.; Feroci, M.; Soffitta, P .; Baldini, L.; Bellazzini, R.; Brez, A.; Lumb, N.; Spandre, G. Sensitivity of a photoelectric X-ray polarimeter for astronomy: The impact of the gas mixture and pressure. InPolarimetry in Astronomy; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2003; Volume 4843, p. 394

    2003

  49. [53]

    On the Operation of X-Ray Polarimeters with a Large Field of View.Astrophys

    Muleri, F. On the Operation of X-Ray Polarimeters with a Large Field of View.Astrophys. J.2014,782, 28. https://doi.org/10.108 8/0004-637X/782/1/28

    2014

  50. [54]

    The future of X-ray polarimetry towards the 3-dimensional photoelectron track reconstruction.J

    Kim, D.E.; Di Marco, A.; Soffitta, P .; Costa, E.; Fabiani, S.; Muleri, F.; Ratheesh, A.; La Monaca, F.; Rankin, J.; Del Monte, E.; et al. The future of X-ray polarimetry towards the 3-dimensional photoelectron track reconstruction.J. Instrum.2024,19, C02028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/19/02/C02028

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/02/c02028 2024

  51. [55]

    New generation of 3D detectors for X-ray polarimetry: Simulation of performances

    Di Marco, A.; Kim, D.E.; Soffitta, P .; Costa, E.; Del Monte, E.; Fabiani, S.; La Monaca, F.; Manikantan, H.; Muleri, F.; Ratheesh, A.; et al. New generation of 3D detectors for X-ray polarimetry: Simulation of performances. InSpace T elescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray; den Herder, J.W.A., Nikzad, S., Nakazawa, K., Eds.; Society ...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3 2024

  52. [56]

    Compton Polarimetry

    Del Monte, E.; Fabiani, S.; Pearce, M. Compton Polarimetry. InHandbook of X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Astrophysics; Bambi. C., Santangelo, A., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2023; pp. 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_27-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_27-1 2023

  53. [57]

    Status of the stellar X-ray polarimeter for the Spectrum-X-Gamma mission

    Kaaret, P .E.; Schwartz, J.; Soffitta, P .; Dwyer, J.; Shaw, P .S.; Hanany, S.; Novick, R.; Sunyaev, R.; Lapshov, I.Y.; Silver, E.H.; et al. Status of the stellar X-ray polarimeter for the Spectrum-X-Gamma mission. InX-Ray and Ultraviolet Polarimetry; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 1994; Volume 2010, p. 22

    1994

  54. [58]

    POLAR-2, the next generation of GRB polarization detector

    Produit, N.; Kole, M.; Wu, X.; De Angelis, N.; Li, H.; Rybka, D.; Pollo, A.; Mianowski, S.; Greiner, J.; Burgess, J.M.; et al. POLAR-2, the next generation of GRB polarization detector. In Proceedings of the 38th International Cosmic Ray Conference, Nagoya, Japan, 26 July–3 August 2024; p. 550

    2024

  55. [59]

    The CUbesat Solar Polarimeter (CUSP) mission overview

    Fabiani, S.; Del Monte, E.; Baffo, I.; Bonomo, S.; Brienza, D.; Campana, R.; Centrone, M.; Contini, G.; Costa, E.; Cucinella, G.; et al. The CUbesat Solar Polarimeter (CUSP) mission overview. InSpace T elescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray; den Herder, J.W.A., Nikzad, S., Nakazawa, K., Eds.; Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation ...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3018158 2024

  56. [60]

    HypeX: High yield polarimetry experiment in X-rays

    Fiorina, D.; Baracchini, E.; Dho, G.; Soffitta, P .; Torelli, S.; Marques, D.J.G.; Di Giambattista, F.; Prajapati, A.; Costa, E.; Fabiani, S.; et al. HypeX: High yield polarimetry experiment in X-rays. InX-Ray, Optical, and Infrared Detectors for Astronomy XI;Holland, A.D., Minoglou, K., Eds.; Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conf...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3021559 2024

  57. [61]

    X-POT: X-ray Polarimetry with Optical Time Projection Chamber

    Baracchini, E.; Costa, E.; Dho, G.; Marco, A.D.; Fabiani, S.; Fiorina, D.; Marques, D.J.G.; Mazzitelli, G.; Muleri, F.; Piacentini, S.; et al. X-POT: X-ray Polarimetry with Optical Time Projection Chamber. InHard X-Ray, Gamma-Ray, and Neutron Detector Physics XXVII; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2025; Volume 13621

    2025

  58. [62]

    Characterization of scatterers for an active focal plane Compton polarimeter.Astropart

    Fabiani, S.; Campana, R.; Costa, E.; Del Monte, E.; Muleri, F.; Rubini, A.; Soffitta, P . Characterization of scatterers for an active focal plane Compton polarimeter.Astropart. Phys.2013,44, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.12.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.12.008 2013

  59. [63]

    X-ray gamma-ray polarimetry small satellite PolariS

    Hayashida, K.; Yonetoku, D.; Gunji, S.; Tamagawa, T.; Mihara, T.; Mizuno, T.; Takahashi, H.; Dotani, T.; Kubo, H.; Yatsu, Y.; et al. X-ray gamma-ray polarimetry small satellite PolariS. InSpace T elescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2014; Volume 9144, p. 91440K. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2056685

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2056685 2014

  60. [64]

    A polarized view of the hot and violent universe.Exp

    Soffitta, P .; Bucciantini, N.; Churazov, E.; Costa, E.; Dovciak, M.; Feng, H.; Heyl, J.; Ingram, A.; Jahoda, K.; Kaaret, P .; et al. A polarized view of the hot and violent universe.Exp. Astron.2021,51, 1109–1141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-021-09722-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s10686-021-09722-y 2021

  61. [65]

    The NHXM observatory.Exp

    Tagliaferri, G.; Hornstrup, A.; Huovelin, J.; Reglero, V .; Romaine, S.; Rozanska, A.; Santangelo, A.; Stewart, G. The NHXM observatory.Exp. Astron.2012,34, 463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-011-9235-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s10686-011-9235-4 2012

  62. [66]

    Hard X-ray reflectivity measurement of broad-band multilayer samples

    Cotroneo, V .; Bruni, R.; Gorenstein, P .; Pareschi, G.; Romaine, S.; Spiga, D.; Zhong, Z. Hard X-ray reflectivity measurement of broad-band multilayer samples. InOptics for EUV , X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Astronomy IV; O’Dell, S.L., Pareschi, G., Eds.; Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2009...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.827871 2009

  63. [67]

    On understanding the figures of merit for detection and measurement of X-ray polarization

    Weisskopf, M.C.; Elsner, R.F.; O’Dell, S.L. On understanding the figures of merit for detection and measurement of X-ray polarization. InSpace T elescopes and Instrumentation 2010: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA,2010, Volume 7732, p. 77320E. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.857357

    work page doi:10.1117/12.857357 2010

  64. [68]

    The IXPE View of GRB 221009A.Astrophys

    Negro, M.; Di Lalla, N.; Omodei, N.; Veres, P .; Silvestri, S.; Manfreda, A.; Burns, E.; Baldini, L.; Costa, E.; Ehlert, S.R.; et al. The IXPE View of GRB 221009A.Astrophys. J.2023,946, L21. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acba17. Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note:The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individu...

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acba17 2023