pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20524 · v1 · pith:5QEF3K2Pnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· gr-qc

String Axiverse Enhancement of Superradiant Dark Matter Production

Diogo S. Gorgulho , Jacob A. Litterer , Jo\~ao G. Rosa This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 16:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords string axiversesuperradianceprimordial black holesdark matterboson starsHawking radiationaxion emissionmicro-boson stars
0
0 comments X

The pith

Emission of many light axions during primordial black hole evaporation increases black hole spin and thereby boosts superradiant dark matter production.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how the large number of light axions expected in string theory constructions alters the evolution of light primordial black holes. Hawking radiation of these axions speeds up the loss of black hole mass while also raising the black hole spin. Higher spin makes the superradiant instability grow faster, so a larger fraction of the black hole mass can be converted into a cloud of axions that later collapses into a micro-boson star. The same multiplicity of axions, however, shortens the black hole lifetime, so beyond a certain number the superradiant cloud never reaches its maximum possible mass. The axions released directly by evaporation contribute negligibly to the radiation density at recombination.

Core claim

The Hawking emission of O(100-10^5) light axion species predicted in realistic string theory constructions can significantly enhance the efficiency of superradiance, given the associated increase in the PBH spin. The string axiverse thus significantly expands the parametric regions (dark matter mass and PBH mass and spin) for which a sizeable fraction of dark matter may presently be in the form of micro-boson stars, the self-gravitating remnants of superradiant dark matter clouds. Conversely, for too large a number of axion species PBHs evaporate too quickly for superradiant clouds to attain their maximum mass.

What carries the argument

The string axiverse multiplicity of light axions, which controls both the rate of PBH spin-up and the duration of the evaporation phase that sets the window for superradiant cloud growth.

If this is right

  • The viable window in dark matter mass and PBH mass-spin parameter space for forming a sizeable fraction of dark matter as micro-boson stars becomes substantially larger.
  • When the number of axion species exceeds roughly 10^5, the evaporation timescale drops below the time needed for superradiant clouds to reach maximum mass.
  • Axions emitted directly by PBH evaporation add an immeasurably small contribution to the relativistic degrees of freedom at recombination, even under the assumption that all dark matter originates from PBHs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Models of early-universe black hole populations may need to track the cumulative spin evolution induced by multiple light species rather than treating each species independently.
  • Constraints on the primordial black hole fraction derived from superradiance limits could shift once the axiverse multiplicity is included in the spin calculation.
  • Future gravitational-wave or pulsar-timing searches for boson-star mergers could be reinterpreted as indirect probes of the number of light axions present during the black hole epoch.

Load-bearing premise

The emission of many light axions during Hawking radiation increases PBH spin without other compensating effects that would cancel the spin gain.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the typical spin of evaporating primordial black holes in the relevant mass window remains low even when the number of light axions is O(100) or higher.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.20524 by Diogo S. Gorgulho, Jacob A. Litterer, Jo\~ao G. Rosa.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Interpolating functions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Maximum initial mass of PBHs that evaporate before [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Same initial spin as Fig. 3, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: , for a lower initial PBH spin. There, in the Na = 0 case the superradiant cloud is completely reabsorbed be￾fore t = 0.2 tevap. With Na = 100, for which the PBH evaporates slightly faster, less reabsorption of the super￾radiant cloud occurs within tevap. Sufficiently many axion species eliminates reabsorption entirely, but even greater Na provides less time for the superradiant cloud to build up before th… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Efficiency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Regions of mass parameter space with at least 1% [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The ratio of axion to total emissivity coefficients is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the effects of string axion emission on dark matter production by light primordial black holes (PBHs), through both evaporation and superradiance. We show, in particular, that the Hawking emission of $\mathcal{O}(100-10^5)$ light axion species predicted in realistic string theory constructions can significantly enhance the efficiency of superradiance, given the associated increase in the PBH spin. The string axiverse thus significantly expands the parametric regions (dark matter mass and PBH mass and spin) for which a sizeable fraction of dark matter may presently be in the form of ``micro-boson stars'': the self-gravitating remnants of superradiant dark matter clouds. Conversely, for too large a number of axion species PBHs evaporate too quickly for superradiant clouds to attain their maximum mass. Finally, assuming that all dark matter is produced by PBHs (through both superradiance and Hawking emission), we show that the axions emitted during PBH evaporation give an immeasurably small contribution to the relativistic degrees of freedom at recombination.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies the impact of O(100-10^5) light axion species from the string axiverse on dark matter production by light primordial black holes (PBHs) via both Hawking evaporation and superradiance. It claims that axion emission during Hawking radiation increases PBH dimensionless spin a*, thereby enhancing superradiant cloud growth and expanding the parameter space (DM mass, PBH mass, and spin) where a sizeable DM fraction can reside in micro-boson stars; excessive species cause overly rapid evaporation that prevents maximum cloud mass; and evaporated axions contribute negligibly to relativistic degrees of freedom at recombination.

Significance. If the central mapping from axion multiplicity to net spin-up holds, the result links string-theory axiverse predictions to observable PBH-driven DM channels and micro-boson-star phenomenology, potentially widening viable PBH parameter regions without introducing new free parameters beyond standard Hawking and superradiance formulae.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (12)] §3.2 and Eq. (12): the assertion that Hawking emission of N axion species produces a net increase in a* = J/M² rests on the ratio dJ/dM remaining favorable, yet the text applies standard greybody factors without demonstrating that the mode-sum ratio is independent of N or that no compensating spin-down channels arise; this ratio is load-bearing for the claimed expansion of the superradiance parameter space.
  2. [§4.1, Fig. 3] §4.1, Fig. 3: the parametric boundaries for micro-boson-star DM fraction are derived assuming the spin-up effect scales linearly with N up to 10^5, but no explicit integration of the coupled dM/dt and dJ/dt equations with N-dependent evaporation timescale is shown; the transition to “too rapid evaporation” at large N therefore lacks a quantitative threshold derivation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2–3] Notation for the number of axion species is introduced as N in §2 but switches to N_a in §3 without a cross-reference; consistent use would improve readability.
  2. [§5] The abstract states the contribution to g_* is “immeasurably small,” yet §5 only quotes an order-of-magnitude estimate; a brief numerical value or upper bound would strengthen the claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive major comments. We address each point below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2, Eq. (12)] §3.2 and Eq. (12): the assertion that Hawking emission of N axion species produces a net increase in a* = J/M² rests on the ratio dJ/dM remaining favorable, yet the text applies standard greybody factors without demonstrating that the mode-sum ratio is independent of N or that no compensating spin-down channels arise; this ratio is load-bearing for the claimed expansion of the superradiance parameter space.

    Authors: The ratio dJ/dM is independent of N. The energy and angular momentum emission rates for each axion species are computed from the standard greybody factors for a single massless scalar; because the species are identical and non-interacting, the totals are exactly N times the single-species rates. Consequently dJ/dM equals the single-species value and does not depend on N. Our model includes only the Hawking emission of the axiverse axions plus standard-model fields; no additional spin-down channels are present. We will add an explicit paragraph in §3.2 stating this scaling and confirming the absence of compensating channels. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.1, Fig. 3] §4.1, Fig. 3: the parametric boundaries for micro-boson-star DM fraction are derived assuming the spin-up effect scales linearly with N up to 10^5, but no explicit integration of the coupled dM/dt and dJ/dt equations with N-dependent evaporation timescale is shown; the transition to “too rapid evaporation” at large N therefore lacks a quantitative threshold derivation.

    Authors: The boundaries follow from the N-linear scaling of the evaporation timescale together with the requirement that the superradiance growth time remain shorter than the PBH lifetime. While the main text presents the resulting parametric regions, we did not display the numerical integration of the coupled equations. The transition to overly rapid evaporation is the point at which the lifetime drops below the time needed for the cloud to reach maximum mass; this occurs near N ≈ 10^5 for the masses considered. We will add a concise description of the integration procedure and the threshold derivation, either in the main text or as a short appendix. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard formulas applied to external string axiverse multiplicity

full rationale

The paper's central claim applies established Hawking emission rates and superradiance dynamics to an externally supplied O(100-10^5) axion species count from string theory. No equation or step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the axion multiplicity enters as an independent input rather than being derived from the superradiance efficiency or PBH spin evolution being computed. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks with no load-bearing self-referential steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond the standard assumption of string axiverse multiplicity; full paper would be needed to audit any additional modeling choices.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5737 in / 1217 out tokens · 16182 ms · 2026-06-26T16:42:49.518546+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    dark boson stars

    0.5 0.99 0 1 10 100 103 104 105 1060 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Na eT,a /eT FIG. 9. The ratio of axion to total emissivity coefficients is independent ofa 0 for low initial spins,a 0 ≲0.1. In the large Na limit, evaporation is dominated by axion emission. that for low spins, withN a ∼ O(100), axions already comprise 60%−90% of Hawking emission. Combining Eqs. (2...

    work page doi:10.54499/uid/04564/2025 2025

  2. [2]

    B. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda and J. Yokoyama, Rept. Prog. Phys.84, no.11, 116902 (2021) [arXiv:2002.12778 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    Bernal, Y

    N. Bernal, Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez and Y. Xu, Phys. Rev. D106, no.1, 015020 (2022) [arXiv:2205.11522 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    March-Russell and J

    J. March-Russell and J. G. Rosa, Phys. Rev. D113, no.10, L101304 (2026) [arXiv:2205.15277 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    Lennon, J

    O. Lennon, J. March-Russell, R. Petrossian-Byrne and H. Tillim, JCAP04, 009 (2018) [arXiv:1712.07664 [hep- ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    Allahverdi, J

    R. Allahverdi, J. Dent and J. Osinski, Phys. Rev. D97, no.5, 055013 (2018) [arXiv:1711.10511 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    Hooper, G

    D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic and S. D. McDermott, JHEP08, 001 (2019) [arXiv:1905.01301 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Bernal and ´O

    N. Bernal and ´O. Zapata, JCAP03, 015 (2021) [arXiv:2011.12306 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    Bernal and ´O

    N. Bernal and ´O. Zapata, Phys. Lett. B815, 136129 (2021) [arXiv:2011.02510 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Masina, Eur

    I. Masina, Eur. Phys. J. Plus135, no.7, 552 (2020) [arXiv:2004.04740 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Baldes, Q

    I. Baldes, Q. Decant, D. C. Hooper and L. Lopez- Honorez, JCAP08, 045 (2020) [arXiv:2004.14773 [astro- ph.CO]]

    arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Gondolo, P

    P. Gondolo, P. Sandick and B. Shams Es Haghi, Phys. Rev. D102, no.9, 095018 (2020) [arXiv:2009.02424 [hep- ph]]

    arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    Cheek, L

    A. Cheek, L. Heurtier, Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez and J. Turner, Phys. Rev. D105, no.1, 015022 (2022) [arXiv:2107.00013 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    Cheek, L

    A. Cheek, L. Heurtier, Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez and J. Turner, Phys. Rev. D105, no.1, 015023 (2022) [arXiv:2107.00016 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Chiba and S

    T. Chiba and S. Yokoyama, PTEP2017, no.8, 083E01 (2017) [arXiv:1704.06573 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    Mirbabayi, A

    M. Mirbabayi, A. Gruzinov and J. Nore˜ na, JCAP03, 017 (2020) [arXiv:1901.05963 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    De Luca, V

    V. De Luca, V. Desjacques, G. Franciolini, A. Malhotra and A. Riotto, JCAP05, 018 (2019) [arXiv:1903.01179 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    Harada, C

    T. Harada, C. M. Yoo, K. Kohri and K. I. Nakao, Phys. Rev. D96, no.8, 083517 (2017) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 99, no.6, 069904 (2019)] [arXiv:1707.03595 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    M. M. Flores and A. Kusenko, Phys. Rev. D104, no.6, 063008 (2021) [arXiv:2106.03237 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Saito, T

    D. Saito, T. Harada, Y. Koga and C. M. Yoo, JCAP07, 030 (2023) [arXiv:2305.13830 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Saito, T

    D. Saito, T. Harada, Y. Koga and C. M. Yoo, JCAP11, 064 (2024) [arXiv:2409.00435 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Neves and J

    D. Neves and J. G. Rosa, [arXiv:2512.03155 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  23. [23]

    Hardy, R

    E. Hardy, R. Lasenby, J. March-Russell and S. M. West, JHEP07, 133 (2015) [arXiv:1504.05419 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2015

  24. [24]

    S. V. Fallon, J. Halverson, L. McAllister and Y. Zhu, [arXiv:2511.20458 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  25. [25]

    Svrcek and E

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten, JHEP06, 051 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0605206 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  26. [26]

    Arvanitaki, S

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper and J. March-Russell, Phys. Rev. D81, 123530 (2010) [arXiv:0905.4720 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  27. [27]

    Arvanitaki and S

    A. Arvanitaki and S. Dubovsky, Phys. Rev. D83, 044026 (2011) [arXiv:1004.3558 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  28. [28]

    Gendler, D

    N. Gendler, D. J. E. Marsh, L. McAllister and J. Moritz, JCAP09, 071 (2024) [arXiv:2309.13145 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Calz` a, J

    M. Calz` a, J. March-Russell and J. G. Rosa, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, no.26, 261003 (2024) [arXiv:2110.13602 [astro- ph.CO]]

    arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Calz` a, J

    M. Calz` a, J. G. Rosa and F. Serrano, JHEP05, 140 (2024) [arXiv:2306.09430 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    D. J. E. Marsh, Phys. Rept.643, 1-79 (2016) [arXiv:1510.07633 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  32. [32]

    C. A. J. O’Hare, PoSCOSMICWISPers, 040 (2024) [arXiv:2403.17697 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    P. Chen, Y. C. Ong and D. h. Yeom, Phys. Rept.603, 1-45 (2015) [arXiv:1412.8366 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  34. [34]

    Baryakhtar, M

    M. Baryakhtar, M. Galanis, R. Lasenby and O. Simon, Phys. Rev. D103, no.9, 095019 (2021) [arXiv:2011.11646 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    N. P. Branco, R. Z. Ferreira and J. G. Rosa, JCAP04, 003 (2023) [arXiv:2301.01780 [hep-ph]]. 12

    arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    Xie and F

    N. Xie and F. P. Huang, Phys. Rev. D112, no.5, 055028 (2025) [arXiv:2503.10347 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys.43, 199-220 (1975) [erratum: Commun. Math. Phys.46, 206 (1976)]

    1975

  38. [38]

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D13, 2188- 2203 (1976)

    1976

  39. [39]

    A. A. Starobinskii, Sov. Phys. JETP37, no.1, 28-32 (1973)

    1973

  40. [40]

    Cardoso, O

    V. Cardoso, O. J. C. Dias, J. P. S. Lemos and S. Yoshida, Phys. Rev. D70, 044039 (2004) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 70, 049903 (2004)] [arXiv:hep-th/0404096 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  41. [41]

    P. Pani, V. Cardoso, L. Gualtieri, E. Berti and A. Ishibashi, Phys. Rev. D86, 104017 (2012) [arXiv:1209.0773 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  42. [42]

    J. G. Rosa, JHEP02, 014 (2013) [arXiv:1209.4211 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  43. [43]

    P. Pani, V. Cardoso, L. Gualtieri, E. Berti and A. Ishibashi, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 131102 (2012) [arXiv:1209.0465 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  44. [44]

    Witek, V

    H. Witek, V. Cardoso, A. Ishibashi and U. Sperhake, Phys. Rev. D87, no.4, 043513 (2013) [arXiv:1212.0551 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  45. [45]

    Brito, V

    R. Brito, V. Cardoso and P. Pani, Class. Quant. Grav. 32, no.13, 134001 (2015) [arXiv:1411.0686 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  46. [46]

    Arvanitaki, M

    A. Arvanitaki, M. Baryakhtar and X. Huang, Phys. Rev. D91, no.8, 084011 (2015) [arXiv:1411.2263 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  47. [47]

    Brito, V

    R. Brito, V. Cardoso and P. Pani, Physics,” Lect. Notes Phys.906, pp.1-237 (2015) 2020, ISBN 978-3- 319-18999-4, 978-3-319-19000-6, 978-3-030-46621-3, 978- 3-030-46622-0 [arXiv:1501.06570 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  48. [48]

    J. G. Rosa and T. W. Kephart, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, no.23, 231102 (2018) [arXiv:1709.06581 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    Cardoso, ´O

    V. Cardoso, ´O. J. C. Dias, G. S. Hartnett, M. Middle- ton, P. Pani and J. E. Santos, JCAP03, 043 (2018) [arXiv:1801.01420 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    Baumann, H

    D. Baumann, H. S. Chia and R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. D 99, no.4, 044001 (2019) [arXiv:1804.03208 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    Baumann, H

    D. Baumann, H. S. Chia, J. Stout and L. ter Haar, JCAP 12, 006 (2019) [arXiv:1908.10370 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2019

  52. [52]

    D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. D14, 3260-3273 (1976)

    1976

  53. [53]

    C. M. Chambers, W. A. Hiscock and B. Taylor, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 3249-3251 (1997) [arXiv:gr-qc/9703018 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  54. [54]

    B. E. Taylor, C. M. Chambers and W. A. Hiscock, Phys. Rev. D58, 044012 (1998) [arXiv:gr-qc/9801044 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  55. [55]

    L. A. Kofman, Phys. Lett. A87, 281-284 (1982)

    1982

  56. [56]

    L. Fu, H. Omiya, T. Tanaka, X. Tong, Y. Wang and H. Y. Zhu, [arXiv:2512.06790 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  57. [57]

    Aghanimet al.[Planck], Astron

    N. Aghanimet al.[Planck], Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020) [erratum: Astron. Astrophys.652, C4 (2021)] [arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    Hooper, G

    D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic, J. March-Russell, S. D. McDer- mott and R. Petrossian-Byrne, [arXiv:2004.00618 [astro- ph.CO]]

    arXiv 2004

  59. [59]

    Arbey, J

    A. Arbey, J. Auffinger, P. Sandick, B. Shams Es Haghi and K. Sinha, Phys. Rev. D103, no.12, 123549 (2021) [arXiv:2104.04051 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    Franciolini and D

    G. Franciolini and D. Racco, Phys. Rev. D113, no.12, 123505 (2026) [arXiv:2603.02322 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv 2026

  61. [61]

    N. Jia, C. Zhang and X. Zhang, [arXiv:2603.29790 [astro- ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  62. [62]

    Goldstein and J

    S. Goldstein and J. C. Hill, [arXiv:2603.13226 [astro- ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  63. [63]

    Baumann, D

    D. Baumann, D. Green and B. Wallisch, JCAP08, 029 (2018) [arXiv:1712.08067 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [64]

    Hananyet al.[NASA PICO], [arXiv:1902.10541 [astro- ph.IM]]

    S. Hananyet al.[NASA PICO], [arXiv:1902.10541 [astro- ph.IM]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1902

  65. [65]

    Sehgal, S

    N. Sehgal, S. Aiola, Y. Akrami, K. Basu, M. Boylan- Kolchin, S. Bryan, S. Clesse, F. Y. Cyr-Racine, L. Di Mascolo and S. Dicker,et al.Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, no.7, 1-23 (2019) [arXiv:1906.10134 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv 2019

  66. [66]

    Sanchis-Gual, F

    N. Sanchis-Gual, F. Di Giovanni, M. Zilh˜ ao, C. Herdeiro, P. Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, J. A. Font and E. Radu, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, no.22, 221101 (2019) [arXiv:1907.12565 [gr- qc]]

    arXiv 2019

  67. [67]

    Di Giovanni, N

    F. Di Giovanni, N. Sanchis-Gual, P. Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, M. Zilh˜ ao, C. Herdeiro, J. A. Font and E. Radu, Phys. Rev. D102, no.12, 124009 (2020) [arXiv:2010.05845 [gr- qc]]

    arXiv 2020

  68. [68]

    A. S. Dmitriev, D. G. Levkov, A. G. Panin, E. K. Push- naya and I. I. Tkachev, Phys. Rev. D104, no.2, 023504 (2021) [arXiv:2104.00962 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Dessert, S

    C. Dessert, S. Kumar and J. T. Ruderman, [arXiv:2511.09631 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  70. [70]

    Baryakhtar, D

    M. Baryakhtar, D. Cyncynates and E. Henry, [arXiv:2602.23424 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv